Cataclysm of Rome, Part 1: The Council of Nicaea

[@superfluity-of-naughtiness777]

Top notch information...i am becoming more and more convinced that shortly after the scriptures were completed and especially after 70 ad, Christianity became more and more co-opted by philosophical power structures and urban influences...I am really glad that there seems to be a return to more pure and unadulterated interpretation and understanding...May God and Christ bring forth some more of this through willing folks like you !

[@haleyaudiss]

Well done brother !👏🙌

[@BibleScribe]

Thank you!

[@LittleSeasonist]

Just found you by your appearance on JT's show. Really solid stuff brother. May God bless & keep you Blessings Shalom fam 🫀

[@kupambazua1579]

Just finished your epic 4 part series and am starting from part one again, because I feel it’s that important! Thank you for reminding that there is nothing to fear but THE FATHER OF JESUS CHRIST HIS ONLY BEGOTTEN SON 😇

[@BenPat88]

Finding you was amazing, thanks JT! Excellent info man, this stuff I have been thinking about for over a decade but thought I would be ostracized so kept it to myself…it’s amazing finding a group that thinks critically and bases Scripture as the foundation of it all!

[@LittleSeasonist]

Amen!

[@juliathomas3380]

Excellent! Looking forward to more! Thank you for all your hard work!

[@stacialogue6095]

Great start! Looking forward to the sequels.

[@rickbowser129]

Wow, you didn't hold back on this one! I've watched it twice now, excellent work! Very controversial and very true. I can't wait for parts 2 & 3! Stay strong, you're gonna get a lot of blowback on this!

[@karenmorgan296]

Excellent 🎉 this was not over my head! I studied this when I was leaving the Catholic Church you put this together beautifully! Looking forward to more🙌🏻Thankful🙏

[@JulieRohloff]

Thank you for this teaching! I am getting ready to watch it again. SO MUCH to take in! I am SO grateful to you!

[@selini86]

Wow that was so enlightening! I'll have to watch it a couple more times, there is so much information. Your work is really appreciated, thank you!

[@BoSS-dw1on]

Hey David - I’m rewatching parts 1 and 2 getting ready for part 3…. Can’t wait!

[@lauramassoud1633]

Great work! I am learning so much. Thank you!

[@chrislucastheprotestantview]

The level of research and time you must have put into this is rather surprising. It is like professional youtuber level. Sadly, most professional youtubers don't do this quality or videos this interesting.

[@brisay1844]

I thank you so much for these videos you are producing.❤

[@debramiller9160]

I really appreciate all your hard work!!

[@sambigg4620]

God bless you David, and thank you for all your hard work. You're literally the only guy I know, that speaks about the 5500 year prophecy. God bless you and yours. ❤️🙏

[@redrider8036]

Absolutely phenomenal presentation and information! Looking forward to the next two installments.

[@paulaherzog7945]

Sooo thankful to have find you!! The Lord has taken me in many different places from the beginning of my journey with Him of 20 plus years. I’ve been doing research in a book called “ a general chronological history of the air, weather, seasons,meteors, & c” It’s so fascinating and talks much about the blood rains, and huge earthquakes, and famines and signs in the heavens.. And talks a few times if battles seen fought in the air And so much more! Thank you for all your research into ancient texts and explanations! Gosh!!! So so helpful! I too have read and still and will always read and read God’s word over and over. It is my source of truth. And he keep showing me little mysteries… so grateful! He is so good and so kind! We must all repent and submit to him and be obedient! Pray and listen to what he has to say! He is our only stronghold!!! Thank You again Can’t wait to dig into your work!

[@kupambazua1579]

This creator, I believe is constantly referring to the history of comets and earthquakes from an old book that you might be talking about youtube.com/@staticintheattic1984?si=T0MJy4dexCwDcQw6

[@shalomshalom4035]

Thank you, great information. So much history we don’t know about.

[@Jobby_Jose]

BEAUTIFUL WORK, Thank you so much👍

[@hilink7]

Really good and so interesting!! Thank for all the research!!

[@dutchd3619]

found your channel a couple months ago, really good stuff !!! I never knew about any of the cataclysms in Rome back then, amazing !!

[@juliathomas3380]

Yay! It has begun!

[@sharyno]

I’m with ya, Brother. I’m actually a Lutheran pastor’s wife and I have been given much revelation about this ….bless and keep you❤️🙏❤️ (I don’t make a very good Pastor’s wife😮)

[@raynawaddell6834]

WOW! So much info there! Great job on this.

[@BibleScribe]

Thank you Rayna. I tried to boil it all down. The last video in the series will show it all in a timeline.

[@raynawaddell6834]

@BibleScribe I'm so thankful you're into this kind of research. History as a subject never interested me. And now, I realize just how important our History is.

[@chrislucastheprotestantview]

Wow, I have only watched the first 3 minutes and the intro is already making me very interested to hear. I have been coming to similar sounding conclusions.

[@lynsinclair7772]

Dear Bible Scribe, have watched all 4 & found them very informative. Just have a few comments re the 2 charts you put up of Arius' beliefs - 1. Jesus was not created, John 1:1 says clearly that he was there 'in the beginning with God'. 2. Yes, he gained life from the Father as he was begotten. 3. Jesus is eternal. I do not think that we, as we are stuck in time, can possibly understand the workings of the eternal outside of time, we just have to accept by faith that Jesus, the Holy Spirit & God have always existed and are One. You've helped me a lot with preterism too, for that I'm extremely grateful.

[@johnk4451]

Not to mention Yashua states in Revelation he is Alpha and Omega the beginning and the end. And when He expressed to the disciple have I been with you this long and you do not know me. Inferring he is the father.

[@IntheL1ght]

@uconspiracy you need to see this video. It lays out the history quite interestingly. Thanks you sir for all your hard work and dedicated research. This was highly enlightening, and I mean in the wisdom way of Jesus not the false enlightenment that Satan has usherred in.

[@johnk4451]

Sorry who or what are you recommending to watch. Which yiutube site or website?

[@IntheL1ght]

@@johnk4451 I'm trying to tag Paul at Understanding conspiracy to watch this video as he has been uniting many people looking into the past Milenium Kingdom, the information in this video is amazing and will help many try to figure out where and when tribulation occurs and the fall of Rome. We have questions about the timeliness between 70 AD and 500 AD. BIBLESCRIBE does a great job in this series putting the information together.

[@johngent1416]

Really Really Good Stuff. I remember thinking when I was going through catechism, what a plot twist it was to have Rome a partner in the greatest crime of all time , end up the motherland of a "Christ based religion?". I was a young but participating as a Roman Catholic and the biblical knowledge was almost like automatic in animals we refer to it as innate. Thanks

[@rachaelrose2970]

Would love to see you and Jimmy Akin talk about this

[@natm.7073]

Nice!!!! 👏👏👏👏thank you

[@kims1912]

When I read what Jesus said to his disciples with fresh eyes, I knew He was speaking directly to them and not to some generation 1000 or 2000 years in the future. My eyes were opened that indeed Jesus came back in his disciples lifetime, as He said He would. The 1000 year dark ages are the 1000 year reign. This is just what Satan's minions would do, invert the 1000 year reign.

[@anopinion9830]

I agree so much

[@sambigg4620]

In 541, John of Asia, also known as John of Ephesus. He was the church father there and he wrote and recorded everything he scene. Heard and done. It is absolutely amazing. It's not easy to find, but it's out there. And you could read it for free

[@BibleScribe]

Thank you... I looked up and will be reading this! syri.ac/johnofephesus#Ecc3.1Text

[@silverhazs4]

I follow you on tiktok 😁

[@sambigg4620]

@@silverhazs4 ❤️🙏

[@GoddessofChaos79]

Part way through your video and it’s really great! Truly appreciate you reading all this information because I really have such bad reading comprehension anymore, if I’m not keeping my hands busy with menial tasks like dishes or laundry etc I can’t seem to focus on information. I had a quick question, you got to the part about Jesus being the begotten son, I always assumed it was through the conception with Mary through the Holy Spirit and not a time before not sure if I’m confusing what you are meaning. Like was Jesus begot in heaven? Second, you say Jesus or the son was never mentioned before the New Testament in scriptures like the Old Testament, however I have heard some pastors and other people make a distinction between The Angel of The LORD in OT and an angel of The LORD saying that The Angel is referring to the spirit of Jesus or Jesus himself. Is it presumption on my part to make the jump that The Angel became The Son in the flesh of Jesus? I apologize if you cover this, I just had to stop and comment and get my thoughts out incase you don’t touch in this I will forget. 😂 Please pray the demons of distraction off of me 😉🤷🏻‍♀️🙏🏻🤦🏻‍♀️

[@makestraightthewayofthelor664]

To the only wise God our Saviour, be glory and majesty, dominion and power, both now and ever. Amen.

[@patriciabicking1628]

Thank you. 😊

[@makestraightthewayofthelor664]

Come unto me, all ye that labour and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest. 29 Take my yoke upon you, and learn of me; for I am meek and lowly in heart: and ye shall find rest unto your souls.

[@makestraightthewayofthelor664]

But take heed to yourselves, lest your hearts be weighed down with [h]carousing, drunkenness, and cares of this life, and that Day come on you unexpectedly. 35 For it will come as a snare on all those who dwell on the face of the whole earth. 36 Watch therefore, and pray always that you may [i]be counted worthy to escape all these things that will come to pass, and to stand before the Son of Man.”

[@kims1912]

As LA Marzulli says, history has been obfuscated.

[@pauldeceglie6914]

You should look into Jay Dyer’s apologetic for the Orthodox Trinity

[@pauldeceglie6914]

- if Christ was not fully human and not also fully God, then how can we be redeemed thru him? I think in the paradox lies the nature of divinity…beyond our rational understanding.

[@andrewmiles2370]

Very enjoyable presentation, much to commend, and I learned much. But i think you may not come to a fully satisfying understanding if you continue to frame this as trinitarian vs Arian. I say "I think" because I'm still also working through this same timeline. Berbers vs Rome, there's a huge thing there. Christ fulfilling many prophecies to do with after His parousia, and exercising judgement, amen.

[@BibleScribe]

Thanks. I appreciate your comments. I tried to respond. In a way, I think the Trinity/Arian controversy was "used" by Rome/Constantine to split the church along the lines of State-control vs. distributed apostolicism.

[@andrewmiles2370]

​@@BibleScribe I agree about the schism being used by Papal Rome. As you somewhat mentioned, Constantine really seemed to favoured Arianism. Personally I think his aims with the council backfired under the sovereignty of God. Arius has also certainly been dealt with unkindly by much of posterity. There's a fascinating letter in a councils, creeds and controversies book (highly recommended series) digging into homousia etc which establishes that supposed doctrinal differences between three factions were simply linguistic, and the theological truth was actually agreed upon.

[@ezrajeremiah8631]

You would like David Bercots work. A different non-preterist view on the Two Kingdoms that takes account for Jesus still reigning.

[@makestraightthewayofthelor664]

Matthew chpt.4 17FROM THAT TIME JESUS BEGAN TO PREACH AND TO SAY,REPENT:FOR THE KINGDOM OF HEAVEN IS AT HAND

[@paulinekingston7479]

Where does the Anglican Church stand in this? Really the same as the Roman Catholics, just without the rosary beads and worship of Mary?

[@HellNoKamala]

They don't have any Pope over them. I'm not endorsing any man-made dogma at all.

[@WashYourWorld]

Pompei was still standing in 1632 (or Anno Domini 632 of the Millenial Reign) Several videos show maps proving this, and in Italy, there is still a stone monument showing Pompei as one of the cities destroyed in the eruption of 1633. So Pompei was not destroyed in 79AD. Also, Pompei murals depict pineapples, which were not available in 79AD. So I think this part is erroneous.

[@ahammer7000]

Your conclusions are true..

[@chrislucastheprotestantview]

I did a few shows recently discussing quartodecimanism, and how those who practiced it probably were truer to the original Christianity that we find in the New Testament. Whereas the Roman Church seems to have these New Traditions that you can't find in the Bible. And I wonder also since all the quartodeciman writings were destroyed that maybe they also had a truer view of how to interpret Daniel and revelation. Seems odd the writings we have of early commentary is mostly what looks like guess work. Surely someone knew the proper interpretation. My guess is, the quartodecimans knew

[@BibleScribe]

I agree with you!

[@chrislucastheprotestantview]

@@BibleScribe your video was kind of exciting for me to hear because it made me feel like I'm not on an island. especially your comment that you just gave

[@makestraightthewayofthelor664]

68But Simon Peter answered Him, “Lord, to whom shall we go? You have the words of eternal life. 69Also we have come to believe and know that You are the [q]Christ, the Son of the living God.”

[@charlissmurph2129]

The Apostles had the true doctrine, they even say if anyone preaches any other doctrine than what we have preached let them be accursed, even an angel from heaven, what did the Apostles preach? What di d Jesus tell them to preach to every creature, Mark 16:16, you can follow the Apostles in Acts.

[@vcbrittney4072]

The declaration that you speak of was not made by the apostles to the Jews in Matthew. It was made by Paul, the apostle to Christian church in Galatians 1 which is the gospel by which we are saved ‘by faith through grace in belief of the death, burial, and resurrection of Christ’ I Corinthians 1-5.

[@makestraightthewayofthelor664]

13 If ye then, being evil, know how to give good gifts unto your children: how much more shall your heavenly Father give the Holy Spirit to them that ask him

[@ClayA.Reynolds]

I though Rome was the iron legs, not the feet of iron and clay. The toes tell another period of time in Daniel that takes place after the feet representing multiple nations that are equal in their strengths and weaknesses, but their strength lies in their marriages/treaties and trade deals. Legs of iron being the longest and strongest reigning empire. The feet continue with a remnant of what preceded it which too will persist into the toes.

[@johnjones8112]

You may disagree with every view I have if we ever met... but be encouraged and let the following words of the NT communitybof acts encourage you: "But the ways of the spirit of falsehood are these: greed, and slackness in the search for righteousness, wickedness and lies,haughtiness and pride, falseness and deceit"

[@makestraightthewayofthelor664]

3Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who has blessed us with every spiritual blessing in the heavenly places in Christ, 4just as He chose us in Him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and without blame before Him in love, 5having predestined us to adoption as sons by Jesus Christ to Himself, according to the good pleasure of His will, 6to the praise of the glory of His grace, by which He [a]made us accepted in the Beloved.

[@NeverAloneNeverAfraid]

Would explain why in general, people of a darker skin color/black are made fun of, looked down upon and treated as less than if this Berber Aryan theory is correct.

[@makestraightthewayofthelor664]

38Then Peter said to them, “Repent, and let every one of you be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the [k]remission of sins; and you shall receive the gift of the Holy Spirit. 39For the promise is to you and to your children, and to all who are afar off, as many as the Lord our God will call.”

[@ppd343]

Undoubtedly the Catholic church usurped Christianity. This is great information. Also, which do you fall under? I believe in the Godhead or Trinity as one, and Jesus was not created. It is the Word of the Father.

[@HellNoKamala]

Likewise. The Word is Jesus. So you can't add anything as these bishops did

[@1stlast290]

The Trinity: One nature. Three persons. One God. John 14 Jesus Christ: One divine person the Word Two natures - Divine and Human John 1:1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was ‘with’ God and the Word ‘was’ God.

[@superfluity-of-naughtiness777]

where exactly does the scripture state "one nature,three persons, one god" or "Jesus Christ:one divine person the word, two nature-devine and human" ???...sounds like extrabiblical magik, outside the logic of scripture...

[@HellNoKamala]

In the non-denominational church of Christ they use this. In the beginning was the Word and the Word was with God and the Word was God. That's saying Jesus is the Word they said. We are to stay silent when it's silent.

[@karenwashburn4279]

Very interesting..o often wonder where true Christians where. But rome rose again and catholics are strong..where are the truth teachings now?

[@BibleScribe]

In the Bible and the most ancient Christian writings.

[@martin2289]

Hard to take any of this seriously given the highly motivated reasoning that is plainly evident in your frankly ludicrous theorizing.

[@superfluity-of-naughtiness777]

Which parts exactly are ludicrous?

[@deanray35]

I hope you explain the "millennium " time frame, the synagogue of the satan saying they are Jews and the angel finishing the spread of the Gospel message to all the earth.

[@paulgundrum9059]

Very interesting, but I must confess that some points of your argument seem weak. While I agree with a historical fulfillment of Matt. 24, your pointing out all the wars, famines, disasters of the Roman Empire is somewhat disingenuous as these were constant throughout the history of the Roman Empire going back to it's founding in the mid-700's BC. Additionally, going by that logic, it would seem Trinitarianism is correct because the Eastern Roman Empire (Byzantium) was around nearly 1000 years after the collapse of Rome. You may also wish to read St Augustine's "City of God" where he deals in a personal way with watching the destruction of Rome and defends against the idea that Christianity brought about the collapse. You point at Churches you claim to be Arian, but fail to point out that several of the Trinitarian Bishops at the Council of Nicaea were from these regions (St Nicholas, St Spyridon, St Hypatius just off the top my head were all from modern day Turkey). Additionally, the fallacy that the "majority is always correct" proves only that many were in error, and it took time to correct the error (through teaching and future Councils). The same thing happened during the Iconoclast era, The Church ultimately had victory over heresy. Numbers and Geography don't equal Truth. There were five major Patriarchates during that time period, not three. You forgot to mention Jerusalem and Constantinople. The overwhelming majority of Bishops voted in favor of the Council's rulings on the Creed and Trinitarianism. Even given the names you mention in this video that were against it, they were the tiny minority. I say that, not to fall into the "majority is right" fallacy, but to say the Bishops are the leaders of The Church and Christianity and their decision is/was binding for The Church. Where were all those Bishops from your red dots? You site an Arian missionary's creed, as though it holds any weight close to equal to a Council of Bishops called by an Emperor. That's your evangelical mindset talking there. You site that those who didn't agree were exiled (and/or excommunicated), though Athanasius himself was later exiled after Constantine's son took the throne (his son was Arian). The term "Homoousius" was used to describe the Council's definition of the Trinity's relation, just as "Trinity" was created by Tertullian to describe Father, Son & Holy Spirit and the "Essence/Energy Distinction" used by St. Gregory Palamas to describe the workings of the Trinity. All of the Councils dealt in some way with Christ's nature/person in defending The Truth against heretical teachings of the times, and so they needed to come up with terms, etc. to clarify. The verbiage used by both sides was nuanced, deep and confusing to the laymen and uneducated, which is why it can still be confusing or seemingly saying the same thing or close to same thing when we read it. What we must remember is that they were speaking a different language that was very nuanced (which our translations don't really pick up on), so their decision and ultimately The Creed is also very nuanced though kept simple for the sake of the Believers. Ultimately, The Roman Catholic Church would come to "rule" the west and were Trinitarian. So the "might makes right" fallacy concerning the Arian Nations ends up being false as they were ultimately defeated, as were the Arians of the East since Byzantium would continue into the mid-1400's practicing Trinitarian Christianity. You can say it's propaganda, but would be hard pressed to prove it given the "dark ages" where the Arian Nations had rule and could have stamped it out in the west. Your theory, though interesting on an intellectual level, seems to be riddled with assumptions.

[@kathycushman6326]

Look into don k Preston's book "who is this babylon

[@BibleScribe]

I do not regard Don Preston's work highly at all. I have found him to be incorrect on many things.

[@sambigg4620]

👏🙏❤️​@@BibleScribe

[@kathycushman6326]

When Jesus said ALL these things will take place in your (disciples) generation what does that mean?

[@BibleScribe]

It means that it occurred in their lifetimes. I agree with that. @@kathycushman6326

[@WareWolf831]

It would have been 45 minutes if you talked at a regular speed not super slow

[@BibleScribe]

Perhaps I could have sped things up. It is a lot of information to absorb for most people. And I do not like channels/videos that present really fast. I believe the information is worth the 1-hour investment. You can always run at double-speed in YT.

[@Casmige]

@WareWolf831 You are free to increase the playback speed up to 1.25, 1.50, 1.75 & even DOUBLE 2.00… So how about you learn something before tapping your flappers??.

[@WareWolf831]

@@Casmige you think your the only one who knows about playback speed 🤦🏽‍♂️🤯🤯. I’m sorry if I process things a little faster than you. I’ll use my kindergarten voice next time I address you

[@andrewmiles2370]

How do you reckon the trinitarian conception to be a paradox? Clearly in Athanasius and modern Trinitarianism, the way in which God is one, is different to the way in which we may identify the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost. Is it more or paradoxical seeming to our minds than the concept of eternity?

[@BibleScribe]

Due to rational thinking, if "A" excludes "B" then "A" and "B" cannot be true at the same time, in the same place. God is perfection. Not chaos. The Athanasian Creed asserts irrationality with almost every sentence.

[@BibleScribe]

Where do you see the word "eternity" in the Bible? I challenge you to find a Hebrew or Greek word that means "eternity".

[@andrewmiles2370]

​@@BibleScribere. Eternity, did I reference the bible? 😁 there are a couple koine Greek words which have that meaning. The Hebrew used in "eternal covenant" really means "beyond sight" as you are aware

[@andrewmiles2370]

​@@BibleScribewhat are you classing as A, and what would be B?

[@BibleScribe]

This is a way of describing rational arguments. You cannot state two things that are opposites and have them be true at the same time. It is irrational, and against nature. A rock cannot be a tree, by its nature. God cannot be 3 people and 1 person, it is a paradox. The Trinitarian argument is, of course, "well, it's God! He can do anything!" But this is exactly what Arius and the rest of the apostolic churches were fighting against. Also, they were mainly disagreeing with the dogmatism of the word "homoousian" which is not in the Bible and should not, therefore, be used to argue the nature of God. @@andrewmiles2370

[@r.lizarraga693]

"Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God: because many false prophets are gone out into the world. Hereby know ye the Spirit of God: Every spirit that confesseth that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is of God: And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God: and this is that spirit of antichrist, whereof ye have heard that it should come; and even now already is it in the world." - 1 John 4:1-3

[@jamessikes6700]

Dear Brother, My question is do you know Christianity is not taught in the Bible but was the Religion of Rome where it has it's Start. Have you ever wondered why neither the Apostles Paul or John never use the word Christian in any of there writing's. Fact is that the Word Christian is used only 3 times: twice in Act's and once by Peter and it is well known the New Covenant Disciples never called them self Christians but followers of the New Covenant Way. The word Saint's meaning Sanctified Ones is the bible word used to describe the Ekklesia Assembly of the Called Out People of God. Brother it is amazing to me how so many truth seeker's do not know what the Bible Word Christ means and how important knowing Christ is not a Person but a Title meaning a Anointed Person who has been Anointed With Godly Consciousness thru and because of Circumcision of the inward Heart. The Sign of Manifesting Godly Character thru the Power of being Anointed by God the Father with the Spirit Of Jesus who is sent to Teach, Guide and give comfort as Promised in Jeremiah and Ezekiah and Gospel of John. Christ in reality is the Great Cosmic Intelligence at the Root of All Life in the Universe. Christ is the Incarnate Christic Life Force Energy that Holds together All Things created that is or will every be. Did you know the Bible teaches the New Covenant contains only One Doctrine which is the single Doctrine Of the Christ Anointing and if a person does not receive and abide in this Doctrine they are not of God. The Roman Church of the first 4 centuries as you have said did nothing but Fight over the Many Man Made Doctrines that still exist today in modern Church Insanity. To verify Read 2nd John 7-11 Just a Few thought that hopefully will make a difference in Knowing Truth

[@harvey_weenstain8857]

Christ means messiah; saviour. Of which there is only one. Christian was originally a derogatory term in antioch, as far as i know. But it referred to followers of Christ. Jesus, _the_ messiah, pointed to the father. Guess im not sure what you're saying here cause it almost sounds like some gnostic junk. Forgive me if im wrong

[@cyranosaurus1423]

It wasn't Christ who conquered rome..it was Germanic tribes (mostly former Roman mercenaries), and it broke apart because of political instabilities and constant civil wars, and Rome kept existing, .it just stopped being an empire because most of its provinces became independent. But East Rome was still an empire...and the idea that Jesus reigned after the fall of Rome...is ridiculous because it was actually a period of unrest, constant military conflicts between different war-lords, conquests, and loads of misery. And we also know the follow up empires that came after rome..and not all of them where Christian. So guess it wasn't Jesus. And why would Jesus even need to conquer anything? According to Christian lore he should be able to take out any army with a snap of his finger.

[@Tom-D-V]

Jesus was born from his Mother: the Goddess, who is the female Wisdom speaking in the Old Testament.

[@boardwalkbw7130]

Jesus is God manifest in the flesh...the Lord in omnipresent and can be both in the body of Jesus and on the throne at the same time. There is one name under Heaven given amoung men by which we must be saved Acts 4:12...Hear O Israel there is One Lord...One Lord One Faith One Baptism in the NAME/SINGULAR of Jesus and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost with evidence of speaking in tongues. Test Acts 2:38 for yourselves and see.

[@beethankfull]

@BibleScribe Where did the true, organic, and basically unnamed followers of Yeshua Messiah, first split and and become two?...or a better question might be, Rather; When did the true followers of Yeshua become so obscure (Perhaps the saints were already in the millennial reign at that time, and we don't have access to good records of it?) and another thinly veiled reproduction of the religious Pharisees come into play complete with the nametag of "The Church"?.. I wouldn't think the "true followers of Yeshua" would give the usurpers any place at all, that would cause people to misinterpret and therefore, believe that these "new religious ones" are of the same "Vine" as they....that Vine being Yeshua the Messiah!

[@BibleScribe]

Ahhhh! They didn't "become obscure"... you will see in the upcoming Parts of this series.

[@beethankfull]

@@BibleScribe Thank you! I'm looking forward to it! Yes...I apologize, I was excited and didn't listen to all first which I know I should have. I hope we can discover more about the Berbers! And thank you again, especially for all your hard work!

[@TheCountofToulouse]

There are statements is scripture such as "Before Abraham was, I AM" and The LORDS statement about being SENT DOWN by the father. GOD states this "they will listen to MY SON". It's really clear that the SON is IN the father and the FATHER is IN the son, the carnal mind cannot recon this nor can the quasi 'spiritual' engaged in errant practices, it will confuse them and leave them apostate and bitter. It's simple and it's ALL in the scriptures. JESUS is the KING OF Mt. ZION, his blood is the ONLY way to the FATHER, his NAME is above every name and there is NO other way to heaven except through him. "No man comes to the FATHER except through ME". While the LORD was with us, the father spoke APART from him "this is my beloved son, in whom I am well pleased" and also THROUGH his son, being the WORD of GOD in the flesh, EMANUEL.

[@ashm3697]

The fact that you know Jesus returned quickly to the same generation and yet you still accept secular history and the “early church fathers “ , shows you are 100% a shill

[@BibleScribe]

Funny. Thanks Pot.

[@makestraightthewayofthelor664]

68But Simon Peter answered Him, “Lord, to whom shall we go? You have the words of eternal life. 69Also we have come to believe and know that You are the [q]Christ, the Son of the living God.”