Hindutva and Hinduism - J Nandakumar -

[@vijayashreeramesh8907]

I am glad to have met him and had the privilege of an interaction with him ....always talks with clarity, crispness, directness, clearly leaving no stones unturned ....

[@hemantbohra4740]

Tremendous speech,

[@vidyasurve6758]

Thank you sir for clearing meaning of Hinduism and Hindutva 🙏🙏

[@jyotivyas9286]

Shri J Nandkumar Guru jee Pranaam 🙏🌻🕉️🏹🔥💯

[@guleriab]

Hinduness; good definition. Actual problem is adopting English language for Indic Dharmic terms. Sanskrit non-translatables by Rajiv Malhotra.

[@refiner2317]

Great video on Hindutva. Hindutva=Hinduism.

[@kaushalidatta6128]

ism is bad suffix.

[@tsnisanth]

Great speech

[@satyamshivam6729]

सर हिंदी में वीडियो बनाया करें कृपया करके

[@dheerajpimoli9539]

Can you provide references where communist praised savarkar

[@vinayak6309]

EMS , M N Roy..

[@jayakrishnanm7838]

Namaste

[@sanatanbharat6407]

Let not others distort and defame the meaning of the word Hindu.

[@mashreqofficemachines]

well said sir

[@KannadaDictionaryWithEnglish]

What is Hindutva? India as a Nation was not born on August 15, 1947, India is a continuing civilization with a Milleniea old Continuity of more than a few thousand years of lived civilizational experience. The primary philosophical thought of India was all-inclusive, all-accepting, it was never exclusivist and most importantly it never negated the existence of any other philosophical, Spiritual, or Religious thought. However when the philosophies of this land came in contact with Semitic Religions, which inherently are exclusivist, Which inherently exclusivist are conflicting, predatory, and proselytizing there needed to be a response by a non-exclusive, inclusive faith which can be called Commonwealth of Hindu Spiritual traditions, to therefore respond to the aggression, predation, and proselytizing attempts made by Abrahamic faiths which came to Indian soil, A response was made by Hindus at that time, and that in later context was called Hindutva. If Hinduism is the potential inclusivity of the commonwealth of indigenous thought, Then Hindutva can be a kinetic effect, which primarily is to defend the Hindu philosophy, culture against Abrahamic-Semitic faiths which is not primarily inclusive, predatory, and proselytizing. Hindutva by nature cannot be aggressive. Because the very response of Hindutva emanated to be defensive. Hindutva is an intellectual, political, socio response of the Hindus to prevent itself and themselves against aggression. Therefore Hindutva cannot be dominating, because Hinduism is a victim of Aggression. Hindutva by its very nature cannot be aggressive, because the very response to Hindutva emanated to be defensive. Unless we examine and scrutinize the Abrahamic Semitic faiths which by their very nature are proselytizing & predatory & which by their very nature go to the extent of negating other faiths as false faiths, then we must ask questions, should Hindus, should not come up with Intellectual, Political - Socio response to preserve and perpetuate the long-lasting way of life. We can't accept the false equivalences drew between two entities. 1. "La Ilah Illa Allah" "There is no God but Allah " 2. "Jai Shree Raam" "Victory to Raam" "La Ilah Illa Allah" is a negation of the existence of my God, However, we won't negate other belief systems. Sir Sayyed Ahmed Khan in 1926, Hindus and Muslims are different Nations. "It is a shame to both the Hindus & Muslamaans that the Hindus should have to run away from their homes as they have done, it is the shame for the Muslims because it is out of the fear of the Muslims that the Hindus have to run away from their homes, why Should a Human being inspire fear on other Human, My own experience but confirms the opinion that the Musalmaan, as a rule, is a bully and the Hindu, as a rule, is a coward" Mahatma Gandhi after Noakhali Massacre. Writing Thoughts on Pakistan - Dr. B.R.Ambedkar. The Hindus and the Hindutva leaders whose primary ideology is a defensive reaction towards aggression have been put in the witness boxes as perpetrators of aggression. That has to change for always and for good times to come, we must be asking questions to those followers and leaders of Abrahamic faiths and we must put them to the same kind of scrutiny as put to the Hindu leaders. Does not your Religion at the very fundamental belief believe in dividing the World between believers and nonbelievers? Is that not exclusivist? Unless we have the intellectual strength to ask these fundamental questions we will be continuing to draw false equivalences and we will be treating the symptoms and not the disease itself. PS: As long as proselytizing Religions continue their existence as Proselytising Religions Hindutva should be there to protect itself and not just protect itself but also protect the values that the Hindu society has perpetually held as sacred & sacrosanct & those values are in consonance to the modern secular values that Indian constitution so dearly upholds..

[@sifr-in]

Can you tell what is "islam"

[@justynjedraszewski6094]

I love India and Santana Dharma, but to be faithfull to it I must add one corretion: Copernicus was not killed, being himself doctor of canon law & catholic priest he was silent, waiting till the last year of his life to publish his discovery.

[@practicewithkrishna6952]

Hindi me banaye

[@sifr-in]

Can you tell, if Hinduism is older than Islam, why did it came up?

[@sujayraomandavilli4732]

Time to usher in a post-Hindutva age. Please be familiar with my work.

[@shafi.j]

First veda Then thoohra Next injil( bible) Lastly Quran First one followed by the period before thoorha came and next followed by bible at last Quran This is the last version Without updating nothing is here in the world We are educated generation We should not be like animals We should see the difference and truth

[@theintolerablemissileanti-5725]

m.kzbin.info/door/wWxqV_yhO_JwVQio_hMWrwvideos Hindu ki ekta

[@ജിഹാദിരാജ്യദ്രോഹി-ഡ7ജ]

Great speech