This sounds great! I think everybody should consider getting one of these.
@ericksonmontalbo7995 Жыл бұрын
this cessna having parachute must implement around the world for the safety of owner and passenger.
@jcmecatronica Жыл бұрын
Congratulations...parachute although being only a slice of the overall safety have made my mind to join GA. My compliments from Brazil.. cheers.
@BrianOgilvie794 ай бұрын
Wow. Great video! Perfect explanations easy to digest and understand and not any extra fluff that was not needed. Refreshing! Thanks Doug for the excellent video!
@terrancestodolka48295 ай бұрын
Great video explanations on the installation and what you do, to the aircraft, and that can be done simultaneously. So then you can fix and upgrade worn parts while working with some upgrading while you're working on the installation of BRS systems on aircraft. Good idea.
@larryblanks67659 ай бұрын
I didn't know they had a BRS system for Cessna!
@jasonscaggs22204 ай бұрын
Great video, is the system for the 206 still in development?
@DougGoodrich3 ай бұрын
Unfortunately, no. BRS scrapped that project a few years ago.
@alecb846Ай бұрын
If Textron had any sales brains they would make it standard equipment and maybe then they could better compete with a Cirrus.
@jstan7311 Жыл бұрын
Excellent description of insulation of a BRS system. Didn’t know that option was out there. Are there videos of the system being deployed on a 182?
@DougGoodrich Жыл бұрын
Lots of Cirrus deployment videos but I have never seen one for a Cessna 182 or 172.
@alienxyt10 ай бұрын
@@DougGoodrich How do you know it works?
@karldunnegan26897 ай бұрын
In principle it should work the same way it does on the Cirrus. But if you're looking for guaranteed safety your in life, piloting a small plane probably shouldn't be on your list of things to do.
@JorgeGomez-lw9xo5 ай бұрын
How much baggage space do you lose?
@maxtaylor5568 Жыл бұрын
could you put one of these in a 180 or 185 taildragger?
@j.r.777 Жыл бұрын
Do these mount in any GA airplane such as a Diamond DA-62 or a Kitfox experimental?
@DougGoodrich Жыл бұрын
Not in the DA-62 but you can get a system for a Kitfox.
@j.r.777 Жыл бұрын
@@DougGoodrich is this the same system in a Cirrus? I like both the DA-62 and the Cirrus SR-22T but am leaning towards the Cirrus over the Diamond simply for the parachute. With the Kitfox, I want to get a Series 7 STI and would also like a parachute in it too. After I get my license and the Kitfox purchased, I’ll be in touch. The planes and the GA license will be my retirement gift to me.
@DougGoodrich Жыл бұрын
@@j.r.777 It's the same basic system by BRS Aerospace. Variations are to chute size (based on gross weight) and attachments.
@user-ik3mk5vi8m4 ай бұрын
DA62 is not experimental
@lifeontheroad_2 ай бұрын
What is cost for this piece of mind?
@NeilBiswasT902 ай бұрын
$13k approx
@roflopoulos16337 ай бұрын
I wish it was mandatory to have these installed on every small aircraft. Would save a lot of lives.
@kilopapa14497 ай бұрын
That's likely true. But at 10,000 to 15,000 dollars to replace, a flight school with several trainers would be out a big pile of money when it came time to replace them. And a few days down time.
@roflopoulos16337 ай бұрын
@@kilopapa1449 I agree. Someday when I own my own Cessna this will be first upgrade I get ♥️
@frankrosenbloom5 ай бұрын
I own a Cessna 182. I can slow it down and land it at about 46 knots. It's true that there are places I've been that a parachute would have been safer than and attempted landing. However, when flying over the mountains a couple of times I realized that if you pull a parachute you have absolutely no control over where you land. You can be put down on the edge of a cliff which would put you in a worse position than trying to land the plane in a valley. I have contemplated installing one in my 182. It would decrease useful load, increase my stall speed, and perhaps induce me to take chances that I otherwise wouldn't. Additionally there have been failures of these devices and if you plan on them and there is a failure it's probably a lot worse than trying to land. Cirrus aircraft have a higher stall speed than high wing Cessnas. If you train well I'm not sure how much more safety this system affords in a Cessna 182. I am willing to be proven wrong however.
@user-ik3mk5vi8m4 ай бұрын
The problem is the majority of crashes are not at high altitude, but taking off, or landing, or what they call CFIT controlled flight into terrain, due to bad weather, were you cannot use it in anyway, but yes if you flying at altitude, then it does make sense, considering the high costs involved for installation
@frankrosenbloom4 ай бұрын
Not in favor of any more mandatory safety regulations. Don't need the government to protect me more.
@RayhanAhmed-qr3vz4 ай бұрын
Ok If a pilot is flying over mountain Area’s and needs the parachute then What ? Please answer this question
@user-ik3mk5vi8m4 ай бұрын
I'll answer the question your impact is still going to be much less than with out 😂
@DougGoodrich3 ай бұрын
Pull the chute and impact the ground safely.
@eprohoda Жыл бұрын
Custom.wow~well vide-owork,=)
@FlyingNDriving4 ай бұрын
Can the 182rg get the BRS?
@user-ik3mk5vi8m4 ай бұрын
This is a 182 😮
@DougGoodrich3 ай бұрын
It's not for any Cessna retracts.
@DaveNorthWest Жыл бұрын
Are there any planes that come manufactured with the parachute already equipped? I don't like that part where someone has to use there back and a latter to get slack out of the wing at 12:19
@alienxyt10 ай бұрын
What's the CG range on a 182?
@user-ik3mk5vi8m4 ай бұрын
Don't think this effect the Cof G more like effect the amount of luggage you can carry
@user-ik3mk5vi8m4 ай бұрын
C of G DEPENDS COULD DIFFER ON TWO OF THE SAME AIRCRAFT, DEPENDING ON WHAT Has BEEN INSTALLED AND WOULD BE WORKED OUT AFTERWARDS NORMALLY
@user-ik3mk5vi8m3 ай бұрын
C of G is calculated on and aircraft, and is not fixed
@apennameandthata20172 ай бұрын
Huge
@apennameandthata20172 ай бұрын
The parachute will help the C of G. 182s are nose heavy.
@SkylaneGuy Жыл бұрын
He's right - it's all for peace of mind. The benefit is 99% in your head. If it gets more people into GA flying, I'm all for it. But in reality, it won't be of any use in 95% of accidents.
@DougGoodrich Жыл бұрын
As Aviators there are so many things we buy, procedures we follow, and things we think about just in case the unexpected happens. But that is why flying is so safe.
@billjones3071 Жыл бұрын
Correct, it’s nothing but false sense of security, spend your time and money on training and plane maintenance, just look at real statistics
@user-ev2qo1hj1g Жыл бұрын
@@billjones3071 So flying over mountainous terrain with nothing but boulders and trees and nowhere to land. Training only and hope you have a miracle happen, or pull the handle when your engine goes out.
@neilsingh5311 Жыл бұрын
@@billjones3071My biggest worry is always an engine out. Seems like a great option to me compared to randomly hoping I have a safe emergency landing spot.
@wayneschenk5512 Жыл бұрын
Assume with a 182 you don’t have speed limits.
@user-ik3mk5vi8m4 ай бұрын
Speed limits for employing the shoot or ?
@stevewilson5546 Жыл бұрын
Your most likely accident will be a stall/spin on base to final. You will be too low for the parachute to be of any help. The parachute will just give you a false sense of security and you will relax your airmanship. Skip the chute and focus on flying the plane.
@fergusonvancouver9921 Жыл бұрын
@@alexp.6406 i agree. How often does it need servicing/repacking?
@steven21457 ай бұрын
Maybe your most likely accident is stall/spin base to final! This addresses engine issues that are not the result of poor pilot procedure execution. The rest is up to the pilot.
@user-ik3mk5vi8m3 ай бұрын
And on take off
@stevewilson55463 ай бұрын
@@user-ik3mk5vi8m The use of a parachute is considerably more complicated than it appears. AVweb posted an article 5 years ago titled "Are planes with parachutes really safer?" It is really worth reading, and you can easily find it by searching KZbin. My own advice is to get some time in an old taildragger and practise stalls and spins (above 5000 ft). This will help you develop the muscle memory needed to recognise incipient stalls, and prevent going onto a spin. Remember, flight depends on airflow remaining in conact with the upper surface of the wing. Once you have stalled the wing, the airflow is no longer in contact with the wing, and you cannot control the plane with the aerolons (sp?). You need to pracise to recognize the mushy feeling of the controls, and to immediately point the nose down and increase power to avoid going into a stall/spin accident. These are usually fatal for everyone on board.