Cessna TTX - Cessna Can Be Fun? Review, History & Specs

[@ronarnott1801]

In 2006 I tried out Mooney, Cirrus, and Columbia 400. By far the Columbia 400 got my nod. I owned one for 7 years. It gave way to a TBM 850. But it's a great plane and better than the others in its class IMHO

[@markusanderson1517]

Couldn't agree more. For me it was a 350 (didn't need the turbo for my mission). It's built like a tank and what an amazing handling plane.

[@TamasLaszlo-83]

A superb video again! 😊Beautiful plane. But honestly: If I think of Cessna, that reminds me the 150,152, 172...etc. But not the TTx... It hasn't got a typical "Cessna-shape" for me🤔

[@Rgrannell]

Beautiful plane, a shame Cessna wasn’t successful with it as it was a better aircraft than a SR22.

[@sadie63]

The two 14 inch screens are not touch screens only the smaller screen between the seats is touch screen.

[@northernandyboy]

What an aircraft shows on the speedometer and what you can actually get out of it are two different things. Cessna 172 aircraft don’t go much over 110 indicated.

[@Shilgi]

Nice video, thank you.but showing a turboprop equipped Lancair when talking about the Continental engine is a little out of place…

[@bigmetalbirds]

haha man I knew that someone will spot a turboprop I left there! nice catch! Well, thats a sign for me that you actually watched the vid closely, and I appreciate that!

[@northernandyboy]

Aren’t those running an IO550?

[@rafaelvelazquez6867]

The resemblance to the Cirrus SR 22 is striking. Who copied whom?

[@c.j.morrison1386]

Lancair released the IV in 1991, the basis for the Columbia. I’d say it was the Columbia with the og design