🚩 The first 1,000 people to use this link will get a 1 month free trial of Skillshare: skl.sh/historymarche12201
@Human.Being233 жыл бұрын
Yaaayyy!
@KiranSingh-zr8jr3 жыл бұрын
Love your videos
@emmanuelfernandez043 жыл бұрын
Any updates on Hannibal?
@generichomosapien46663 жыл бұрын
darn
@saratmodugu27213 жыл бұрын
The avar khanate still had Slavic vassals at the borders of the khazars and as far as north Poland. You map is wrong
@Mr_M_History3 жыл бұрын
The quality of your maps is insane. Makes a huge difference in gaining a detailed understanding!
@onetwothreefourfive123453 жыл бұрын
So true
@ramichahin23 жыл бұрын
its a lie to call roman catholicism ''The True Christian Faith'' because the romans paganised The True Faith beyond recognition.
@aSm8full3 жыл бұрын
and the lack of jokes are a great plus too as they kind of break the immersion imho
@DenUitvreter3 жыл бұрын
Indeed, even the Netherlands shore line and inner waters, which have changed a lot over the centuries, are period correct.
@iowastate3583 жыл бұрын
A racist that didn't open his land to Muslims and Africans
@kaspernielsen91493 жыл бұрын
I love geography and I admire your sense of detail in these maps. e.g the Netherlands have their actual correct size for the time, and not the reclaimed area they have now. maybe people miss these small details, but when u see them done right it is oh so satisfying to look at. :)
@HistoryMarche3 жыл бұрын
Glad you noticed. Thank you for the nice words.
@Matthew109503 жыл бұрын
@@HistoryMarche I can only hear any reply or posted comment from HistoryMarche in the narrators voice. I know it isn't right, but I can't help it!
@HistoryMarche3 жыл бұрын
@@Matthew10950 The commander ordered the men to drink a cup of milk and then to charge forward! As the two armies clashed they began tickling each other to death. Many men fell, but it was a lot of fun and a lot of laughter!
@Matthew109503 жыл бұрын
@@HistoryMarche lol, undoubtedly a quote from the upcoming series "Hugh Hefner, and the siege of the Playboy Mansion"
@dingliedangliedoodle92613 жыл бұрын
Liam Neeson and his "very particular set of skills" caught me offguard lmao
@Michael_______3 жыл бұрын
Made me laugh. I love that very much.
@iowastate3583 жыл бұрын
A true racist that didn't open up the land to mass Muslim and African migration 😭
@iowastate3583 жыл бұрын
No LGBTQ++ community 😭
@andrewharper31653 жыл бұрын
@@iowastate358 take that nonsense somewhere else, you're ruining an otherwise brilliant channel with your narrow minded blinkered self.
@BStial2233 жыл бұрын
@@iowastate358 what African immigration are you talking about ? Learn your 8th century history, because you are talking bs
@metalpsyche823 жыл бұрын
The partition in chapters and the quotes of historians really give an edge to your videos
@andersonolb17933 жыл бұрын
One of my favorite medieval characters. Not only by his influence and important role in medieval history, but for all he achieved during his lifetime. I can't wait for the next episode of the series, and congratulations to HistoryMarche for another great production.
@joachimverbruggen60623 жыл бұрын
Yes but the much important groundwork was laid by his father Pepin, I don't think you can't talk about charlemagne and dismiss Pepin so easy.
@andersonolb17933 жыл бұрын
@@joachimverbruggen6062 You're right my friend. Pepin set the basis from which the carolingian dinasty could grow its influence throughout most of Europe, especially the close ties established with Church, from which they gained the necessary legitimicy to rule.
@MikhailTabigay3 жыл бұрын
One of Napoleon Bonaparte’s heroes
@Nomadicenjoyerplus3 жыл бұрын
Others are Julius Caesar, Hannibal Barca, Alexander the Great, Nader Shah though 🤨
@ru45823 жыл бұрын
Literally every European monarch after Charlemagne were in some way trying to replicate his career.
@angelostriandos66593 жыл бұрын
That is why even Napoleon went to the Pope for his coronation. Legitimacy is always the question.
@MikhailTabigay3 жыл бұрын
@@ru4582 yeah, and Charlemagne wasn’t the first man in Europe to conquer different lands?
@AlexC-ou4ju3 жыл бұрын
@@MikhailTabigay Rome?
@nervachadikus3 жыл бұрын
Me: This day can't be better HistoryMarche: Hey there
@mihkeltroost87693 жыл бұрын
for real I have been waiting for a video about Charlemagne for a loong time
@edishasora52003 жыл бұрын
For real! It just their viewers isnt as massive as KnG. I think HM need to work on their thumbnail more. The content are way way better than the thumbnail. It could be more tempting to click. Hope HM team see this and working more on the thumbnail
@nervachadikus3 жыл бұрын
@@edishasora5200 True, I will remember the animation from the fall of the west for the rest of my life
@CelticSaint3 жыл бұрын
Bad day for me. Diagnosed with an inoperable cancer. I have 6 months at most. But I'll be watching these videos to my last breath.
@edishasora52003 жыл бұрын
@@nervachadikus yea it was lit. For me its battle of Ain Jalut, Mongol defeated near jerussalem. Feels like watching a movie. The narration and the struggle it was spot on
@hashirmuhammad47313 жыл бұрын
I am still PATIENTLY awaiting the Hannibal series so please HistoryMarche make my wish come true
@drlca66013 жыл бұрын
bruh we just got Charlemagne, this is a victory... patience
@bahaataleb77253 жыл бұрын
they already did it
@53yearsago563 жыл бұрын
@@bahaataleb7725he never covered the battle of Zama so I hope they will continue the series.
@midoelshafaey80263 жыл бұрын
R u kidding me !? It’s their biggest series .. they already did it
@ElderGod43 жыл бұрын
@@midoelshafaey8026 nah its just started
@fergusmallon13372 жыл бұрын
Clean, concise, Informative. This is the best video on Charlemagne. He laid the groundwork for modern Europe.
@NR-rv8rz3 жыл бұрын
At 13:58 it states that the Pope believes he has implicit superiority over the emperor. But this is not the case. The understanding was that the Pope had supremacy over spiritual matters and the Emperor had supremacy over earthly matters. That is why, if I am not mistaken, the Emperor kneels before the Pope to be crowned but after he is crowned the Pope bows to him.
@nathanscarlett47723 жыл бұрын
Interesting, I did not know this. Thank you.
@justinian-the-great3 жыл бұрын
Ah Charlemagne, truly the greatest medieval European ruler.......well, at least bedsides us TRUE Romans.
@sijanshamsulalam42433 жыл бұрын
Very rare of you praising the barbarians of the west my liege.
@nonnayerbusiness77043 жыл бұрын
Too bad you left your own empire an over-extended, bankrupt and depopulated shadow of its former self.
@chrissantos10123 жыл бұрын
You’re not even Roman bro
@justinian-the-great3 жыл бұрын
@@sijanshamsulalam4243 Well, the credit should be given where it is due. Sure, Charlemagne is a barbarian and a wicked one (he stole the one and all title of the Roman Emperor), but there was never a greater barbarian in the medieval Europe.....that is, as much "great" as barbarians can achieve greatness.
@justinian-the-great3 жыл бұрын
@@nonnayerbusiness7704 Or perhaps famine, dozens of dammed earthquakes and, you know, a FRICKING SECOND WORST PANDEMIC OF PLAGUE IN THE ENTIRE HISTORY did that, huh? Also, I didn't really left my Empire bankrupt, since I managed to recover the economy in 550's, so I don't know from whom you heard that story of bankruptcy? At least my Empire existed for another 9 centuries, while Charlemagne's fell apart just 29 years after his death.
@cidmatrix96433 жыл бұрын
The maps just keep getting mappier. Love it!
@jeffagain7516 Жыл бұрын
Thanks very much once again HistoryMarche for an outstanding vid! Just wanted to take a moment to mention that I am extremely happy to see your use of some of the most noteworthy paintings history has provided us, no more so than that of The Coronation of Charlemagne, at the T.S. 8:50 mark. I once saw a film that explained in great detail (forgive me, I forget the name of it) why the great artists drew what they drew. In essence, every person in these frescoes are there for a reason and in fact their individual gestures, expressions, actions, dress, etc has strong reason for being the way they are in the painting. An absolutely fascinating revelation to me back then and I've since tried to discover the hidden meanings portrayed in all the great artworks, since. Folks may wish to do the same, as it reveals FAR MORE to a painting than we ever actually imagined!
@HistoryMarche Жыл бұрын
Thank you so much for the positive feedback. Truly appreciated!
@Austin_Schulz3 жыл бұрын
Leo III is actually considered a saint in the Catholic Church, probably for being one of the most based dudes of the Middle Ages.
@rmp7400 Жыл бұрын
@Austin Based dudes?
@oboroth51 Жыл бұрын
Papist schismatic🤢
@younes24153 жыл бұрын
He was truly great, to put into perspective, all of West Europe was broken in pieces, no unity but all of that changed with his hard work!!
@thhseeking3 жыл бұрын
And then fell apart gain after his death.
@younes24153 жыл бұрын
@@thhseeking he left a basis for a state in Germany and France, to put into perspective again, there was no unity in what we call France now or Germany, he unified these towns and their economies.
@Billswiftgti3 ай бұрын
No unity after him either. False achievements, false emperor.
@groundzero5708Ай бұрын
@@Billswiftgti only a fool like you will think like this
@vladtarniceru3943 жыл бұрын
Great video and great editing! Just something I would love to have: the current year should always be displayed in the top-left side of the screen (it would be very nice to see how the years pass by as I observe the teritorial changes) and also to have the current age of each character displayed near/inside their flag. Anyways, thanks again for the great work & content, I learn a lot from it!
@GabrielBelmont47273 жыл бұрын
One of the best channels. So detailed and vivid. The quality is bombastic. Thanks for making these amazing videos!
@ryanrogers94573 жыл бұрын
The illustrations are so good!
@HistoryMarche3 жыл бұрын
Thank you sir.
@zacjie15513 жыл бұрын
😀
@jezm78283 жыл бұрын
The character details are very challenging.
@zacjie15513 жыл бұрын
@@jezm7828 :}
@arabian93723 жыл бұрын
Oh how long have i wated! This is the kind of channels that deserve the most support in KZbin, not the silly ones, thank you 🌹
@AeneasGemini3 жыл бұрын
what's wrong with silly channels? Plenty of room for both to be appreciated!
@arabian93723 жыл бұрын
@@AeneasGemini hungry for argument much? watch jake paul and the likes of him, if there is room for them in your time, but not mine dear aeneas, not mine
@talleyhoe8462 жыл бұрын
I wish superb content like this was available when I was studying history. Brings it to life thereby greatly facilitating comprehension and retention.
@ArabianRazumZar3 жыл бұрын
Charlemagne was one of the most influential figures in Christianity can’t wait for part 2 Will there be a battle ?
@kolerick3 жыл бұрын
well, there are few that documented further than the result... the one that would be documented would be a defeat, in Ronceveau...
@almightydummy2 жыл бұрын
true, every European colonizers execute natives that worships other Gods. Good old days.
@zahirhussain59132 жыл бұрын
What did Charlemagne ? Destroying the places of worship was also used as an alternative method of conversion when peaceful means of persuasion ( preaching , miracles , etc. ) or social factors ( rewards , etc. ) seemed insufficient ". ARTICLE : Christian Attitude towards Pagan Monuments in Late Antiquity and Their Legacy in Later Byzantine Centuries page - 49 AUTHOR : Helen Saradi - Mendelovici SOURCE : Dumbarton Oaks Papers , Vol. 44 ( 1990 ) , pp. 47-61
@zahirhussain59132 жыл бұрын
Christianity spread by sword: Charlemagne conducted his first campaign against Saxons in 772 AD .His forces advanced rapidly to the castle of Eresburg and destroyed the major Saxon shrine called the " Irminsul " The Royal Frankish Annals for 772 triumphantly claimed that huge amounts of treasure , consisting of gold and silver had fallen into Charlemagne's hands , plunder that may have been pagan sacrificial offerings ; this booty also seemed to fire the enthusiasm of the king's retinue for waging war . BOOK : CHARLEMAGNE . Author : Johannes Fried . Translated by Peter Lewis . Edition 2016 page - 99 .
@zahirhussain59132 жыл бұрын
Under Charlemagne rule : " Many people died in infancy , some in maturity and others in old age " . " Many of the poor found themselves forced by sheer poverty to kill their infant offspring , above all , girls . Many other babies were exposed and left to die- archetypes for the fairy tale of Hansel and Gretel . It was just a fact of life then that some times people found it impossible to feed their children . People lived in their respective world's , rich or poor , sated or hungry , and not a few of them in desperate need . " BOOK : CHARLEMAGNE . Author : Johannes Fried . Translated by Peter Lewis . Edition 2016 page - 57 .
@Remiball12215 ай бұрын
One of the best presentation I’ve ever seen , amazing narration guys. Show off!!!!!!
@LewisPulsipher3 жыл бұрын
I've not studied Charlemagne's military campaigns specifically, but my understanding was that he conquered by superior numbers, logistics, and organization, not by big battles. A BIG battle was a chancy affair, and he wisely avoided them most of the time. E.g. he caused the Avars to disappear from history, without any big battle.
@Dave_Sisson3 жыл бұрын
I've always wondered what race / linguistic group the Avars belonged to. Were they Germanic, Magyar, Turkic, Slavic or something else?
@faramund98652 жыл бұрын
C is pronounced K in Odoacer. And the A is 'soft' like in the word 'bar'. And the emphasis is, as always in Germanic words, on the first letter. >O
@ragingsage39733 жыл бұрын
I really wish that the 769 AD start date would be on CK3 but oh well.
@williamtheconqueror78073 жыл бұрын
Mhm.
@niccolocaramori72883 жыл бұрын
Play CK2 then or use a mod
@TheMops143 жыл бұрын
Don't worry, you'll get it in a DLC for 20$. That's Paradox for you.
@impaugjuldivmax3 жыл бұрын
@@TheMops14 20$ just for maps, without skins of units
@mariano98ify3 жыл бұрын
@@TheMops14 and not problem for me if the content of the expansions or vanilla game is good. What it is your problem? do you prefer that paradox focus in release sequels each X years???
@jeffreese18283 жыл бұрын
I read a book on Charlemagne , once , I think by Lamb , his accomplishments were absolutely phenomenal . Great vid , thanks !
@kylebell7879 Жыл бұрын
You’re way better than KingsAndGenerals ❤
@dawarrior953 жыл бұрын
Thank you History Marche for doing what you do. My favorite History Channel on the tube. You may not release videos at the rate that the other channels do, but the ones you do release are of the upmost quality. It only gets better and better, to the point of being cinematic. You are doing heavenly work for us history nerds. Thank you.
@ThisisBarris3 жыл бұрын
Brilliant video Mago! Can't wait for part 2.
@HistoryMarche3 жыл бұрын
Coming soon!
@arandomwalk3 жыл бұрын
You have inspired me to create a video! Will be coming out soon. No self promo, just appreciation to y’all
@KHK0013 жыл бұрын
Did not expect video this soon! Thank u HM
@luukkievit88923 жыл бұрын
Man, John Julius Norwich could write very well. Extremely rich description that explains the concepts very clearly and concise. Simultaneously it is written as if it is a narration.
@CivilWarWeekByWeek3 жыл бұрын
So glad for this story
@Countinzeroeseveridai3 ай бұрын
always a pleasure
@unclesam52303 жыл бұрын
Charlemagne is one of the greatest statesmen of middle age Europe who restored a portion of the Western Roman Empire.
@alvarojaviervargasuriza23403 жыл бұрын
I'm really greatful for the making of these videos, thank you.
@charlemagne66443 жыл бұрын
The spread of Christianity, was not just for a Cultural Unity. In the Cloisters, they could form a new Educated Upper Class. Reading and Writing helps alot for gaining Knowlege of all Kinds.
@Leptospirosi3 жыл бұрын
Except the most ancient cloisters which started hosting valuable books, were built by the Lombard in Italy and by the Visigoth in southern France, both of which, by the VIII were fully converted to Catholic Christianity. Most of the new monastry came from Ireland to the mainlad, on which Charles had little to do with. Fact is that spreading of Christianity had little to do with Charles politics except to enforce control. As all of Germany was already catholic christian, the only "spread" Charles did of Christianity was over Saxony, a very small part of Germany, using faith as a tool to submit the tribes he had not completely genocided or deported.
@krzkam7792 Жыл бұрын
love those videos
@trentondamm1943 жыл бұрын
Once I saw empress Irene and the Byzantine Empire I cant stop watching this!! and can you guys please do the rise and battles of basil II or the rain of Empress Irene !:)
@ΘΕΟΦΑΝΩΚΟΜΝΗΝΟΣ3 жыл бұрын
Basil the Hellenic sator!
@trentondamm1943 жыл бұрын
@@ΘΕΟΦΑΝΩΚΟΜΝΗΝΟΣ More like Basil the Bulgar Slayer!
@jonathancummings64002 жыл бұрын
Had they had this sort of presentation of his greatness, they wouldn't have balked at embracing him and joining him to restore the Roman Empire in it's full ancient glory.
@MrGordonSims3 жыл бұрын
The commercial at the beginning is one of the most engaging I’ve seen. Very well presented sales pitch. Also, these videos are incredibly well done.
@evilinside63273 жыл бұрын
It's the first time I learn about Charlemagne. Impressive individual.
@papazataklaattiranimam3 жыл бұрын
The Abbasid caliphate reached its apogee under his rule, which was characterized by relative peace, prosperity, and unity of the Islamic community. Corresponded with and sent a diplomatic mission to the Holy Roman Emperor, Charlemagne, opening a period of technological and economic exchange with the West. Established a hostel for Christian pilgrims in Jerusalem. Set up the first hospital and observatory in Baghdad, which served as models for later rulers.
@shahsaud26253 жыл бұрын
Well, medieval Islamic world was way better. It's now that the Muslim world is a mess
@ru45823 жыл бұрын
@@shahsaud2625 industrialization definitely brought many more sources of division into the Muslim world than the previous millennia. The abbasids didn’t have to deal with imperialism and weird borders and had a relatively united caliphate under their governance. Hell, they had an actual caliphate to work with, whereas the position has been vacant nowadays ever since the dissolution of the Ottomans.
@Artur_M.3 жыл бұрын
If I'm not mistaken, they sent a living elephant in this mission, as one of the gifts.
@shaynebiggs88312 жыл бұрын
You guys and kings and generals are the best I've found.thank you
@f.e.gviper16013 жыл бұрын
This is very convenient I’m taking AP ero this year and we had to learn the time period of 750 to 1450 over the summer.
@faizananjum363 жыл бұрын
The best Channel for War History and is never biased, great job. Do make a Documentary about Ghazva Khandak !
@zaidbayaty38653 жыл бұрын
Great work 👏 👍 I would like to suggest a series to cover the second crusade both the Eastern and western parts which not yet covered by any historical channel
@markfiedler94153 жыл бұрын
Thanks for doing a Charlemagne video! I feel like despite how influential his reign was I know comparatively little about it and the broader geopolitics and culture of the period.
@xenotypos3 жыл бұрын
It wasn't the "holy" roman empire yet, it was just called the roman empire. The HRE is an entity that is indeed derived from Charlemagne's empire, but noticeably different as well, and not just in name. The HRE as we know it will be created later, in a more germanic-centric context.
@wy20412 жыл бұрын
Actually that would be the germanic Holy Roman Empire, not the same thing as the Holy Roman Empire
@johnnyboy34102 жыл бұрын
the actual Holy Roman Empire is the one Otto The Great created i guess but it wasn’t called Holy until Fredreich Barbossa one of the greatest if not greatest Holy Roman emperors, he was the one who named it holy
@sebe22552 жыл бұрын
I would say a more German context. The Frankish Empire definitely had a Germanic character, given that the Franks themselves were and still are Germanic.
@xenotypos2 жыл бұрын
@@sebe2255 It doesn't have much to do with the differences between the Carolingian empire and the HRE. But since you're mentioning it, I'd argue that the early Franks didn't that much to do with the later Franks. During Charlemagne time, "frank" had been a term designing the people in a lot of places including modern day France for centuries. And there are a lot of Germanic ancestry in the northern half of France. French itself was influenced by germanic dialects even if it's a latin language.
@sebe22552 жыл бұрын
@@xenotypos Not really. Frank became a general term to refer to people from western Europe because of the success of the Frankish Empire. Other cultures labeling a very broad region of western europe as Frankish has little relevance to determining who the Franks were ath that point. When you say early Franks were little like later Franks, that is true and untrue. In the sense that later Franks were more organized christians, they were little like early Franks. But they still spoke their language and continued many cultural practices. Of course over hundreds of years cultures change, but that applies to every culture, and in that way, no culture is like it was 1000 years ago. Neither Franks, nor French of Germans or anyone beyond those regions. As for the Germanic heritage in northern France, of course there is some, but it is limited to the very north and the Alsace. And not all of them are Frankish in nature, the Alsace for one is/was Allemanic.
@onetwothreefourfive123453 жыл бұрын
Another fantastic vid from one of my top 3 history channels :)
@zhugeliang21213 жыл бұрын
Thank you for providing us with more valuable videos translated into Arabic💜
@HistoryMarche3 жыл бұрын
My pleasure 😊 Arabic subtitles added.
@zhugeliang21213 жыл бұрын
@@HistoryMarche We have benefited a lot from the history of your channel and I hope all your historical videos are from all over the world Chinese and European to translate into Arabic
@darkovia1116 ай бұрын
Charlamagne is an ancestor of mine. I have a ton of nobility in my family lines and i can trace both of my parents lines at least as far back as Charlamagne and further. Its actually really cool seeing how far back it goes on charts.
@rosshugecaulk3 ай бұрын
That's like any Asian guy saying he's related to Gengis Khan lmao
@historyforyou33273 жыл бұрын
Don't forget to share the interaction of Charlemagne with Muslim sultan Haroon Al Rasheed
@wyattforbess75043 жыл бұрын
Best channel ever, I swear
@JawsOfHistory3 жыл бұрын
I find it equally fascinating that the title Magnus - Charlemagne comes from "Carolus Magnus" in Latin, "Charles the Great" - has survived since antiquity (i.e. Pompeius Magnus, Caesar's rival in the Roman civil war) as I found it disappointing that Charlemagne wasn't just a really cool name.
@FatGouf3 жыл бұрын
Just call him Charlie the Great.
@Nielsly3 жыл бұрын
Karl the Great sounds less impressive than Charlemagne
@BillGreenAZ3 жыл бұрын
Whenever I see the name Charlemagne, I try to think of it as "Charles the Magnificent" since it shares the root of that word.
@Nielsly3 жыл бұрын
@@BillGreenAZ magnificent comes from magnificentior “great in deeds”, from magnificus, from magnus + facere “to act great”, magne comes from just magnus “(the) great/big”. So Karl the Great, in the same row as Alexander and Peter, not in the same row as Suleiman.
@BillGreenAZ3 жыл бұрын
@@Nielsly So Charlemagne means "large Charles" and not "magnificent Charles"?
@sparrowman3 жыл бұрын
This is brilliant quality. Only epic history is it's equal.
@resileaf95013 жыл бұрын
Good new style of video! It's good to vary the content to include non-battle videos too. Looking forward to part 2!
@HistoryMarche3 жыл бұрын
Glad you enjoyed!
@adamdrake67502 жыл бұрын
Your voice is perfect for these videos
@DeardropsRiho3 жыл бұрын
Let's shed the blood of the Saxon men!
@nightrunner37013 жыл бұрын
They were pagans… For the ignorant morons out there… Even IF the pagans were not raiding civilized lands, they were always fighting each other, so inevitably 1 if the various groups will try to get help from the civilization closest. Providing ample reason for conquest.
@dittmannrudolfrohr21493 жыл бұрын
@@nightrunner3701 "Pagan" is an exonym.
@AlphaSections3 жыл бұрын
@@nightrunner3701 I thoughts exactly!
@ramiromen65953 жыл бұрын
It's insane that we never had a proper series about Charlemagne in any of the big channels..... Until know! Thanks HM!
@kolerick3 жыл бұрын
I guess the lack of accurate battles recounts is the problem... we know of the results and maybe 1 "good" recount that was defeat because of the "comments" that come with the song of Rolland, but most of his known/recorded work was "political" and that isn't what youtuber believe the most interesting for their viewers... so there are a few series about him, but on "indies" channels... need to specifically search it
@KiranSingh-zr8jr3 жыл бұрын
Sad how his empire fractured just after his death.
@AlexC-ou4ju3 жыл бұрын
it lasted at least trough his son Louis the Pious, who ruled for 27 years, it wasn't quite alexander and the diadochi
@nervachadikus3 жыл бұрын
@@AlexC-ou4ju Yeah but Louis barely held it together and by the end of his reign his sons were tearing the empire apart for the second time
@prs_813 жыл бұрын
Charlie got the mil stats high but didn't do enough cul tech to reach past gavelkind. A newbie mistake if you ask me
@DarkKing0093 жыл бұрын
I said it once and I'll say it again. I like it knowing it will be great before seeing the video!
@Awesomewithaz3 жыл бұрын
Last time I was this early Charlemagne wasn't even Emperor yet.
@konstandinostsintaris84453 жыл бұрын
I missed history march videos. I thought the channel was slowly and sadly dying but this great video proved that is still rising
@zacjie15513 жыл бұрын
Subscribed😁
@HistoryMarche3 жыл бұрын
Welcome to the channel.
@zacjie15513 жыл бұрын
@@HistoryMarcheThanks
@wolfbeastdevil3 жыл бұрын
It has been so intriguging to understand the ways of the past leaders and their principles of ther governence which brought greatness to its people and their lands
@inuuteqstotts96393 жыл бұрын
Thank you! Keep it up HistoryMarche!
@chasemurraychristopherdola71083 жыл бұрын
Just saying but I would love to see a video on the 778 battle of Roncevaux pass and I am interested in this battle because even though it was a defeat for charlemagne the battle saw the death of a Frankish military leader named Roland and his death elevated him and the members of charlemagnes court aka the paladins into legend becoming the quintessential role model for knights and greatly influencing the code of chivalry in the Middle Ages aka the dark ages and this battle is recounted in the 11 century The song of Roland which is the oldest surviving major work of French literature.
@rafiullahqazi77313 жыл бұрын
I only love your voice when you are explaining. In other videos I hardly watched it because there was a different voice but you're one has magic Mashallah (protect you from evil eyes).
3 жыл бұрын
OH YES, this oughta be delightful
@thhseeking3 жыл бұрын
Betty!!
@TwinIonEngines3 жыл бұрын
I learn more from you guys than any history book, please keep up the fantastic work! (And soothing voice work)
@youvebeengreeked3 жыл бұрын
Charlemagne and Irene could have literally just declared the Western and Eastern Roman Empires respectively. This makes me mad af 😂😅
@Hades_Orkos3 жыл бұрын
Honestly pretty ridiculous
@laonch60733 жыл бұрын
No? He missed so much land from the actual "Western Roman Empire" that it's almost ridiculous... Don't forget literally illirya, the rest of Spain, England, and well, Africa
@youvebeengreeked3 жыл бұрын
@@laonch6073 I meant more in status rather than physical boundaries.
@laonch60733 жыл бұрын
@@youvebeengreeked even status wise, it wasn't an empire like the WRE used to be, he didn't start any process of Romanisation (or Frankisation) (I mean, not many empires did that though). Status wise was just a big chunk of land, without a centralised or consolidated power. What then makes it similar or comparable to what the WRE was?
@aurelian26683 жыл бұрын
@@laonch6073 Yeah like in comparison was the franks even really roman? They did not have roman culture instead have a mixed one.
@alien-vx2bj3 жыл бұрын
i have a big problem with chanel. i saw all the videos in just few days,some of them twice. the problem is that the upload rate is toooo low. love the quality of this videos. keep it up mate.
@rashisti3 жыл бұрын
I gladly pay homage to the algorithm on behalf of HistoryMarche!
@dillonblair64913 жыл бұрын
I've been wanting a carolingian empire documentary for a while now 😳
@الوليدبنمحمد-ذ5ذ3 жыл бұрын
He is the Father of All europeans and Father of Cross and Christianity
@tapsaforss95043 жыл бұрын
Steps to greatness 1. Grind 2. Rise 3. Fame Thats what my boi Charlemagne did💪
@myheadisaverydarkplace78423 жыл бұрын
Charlemagne like "Hey Saxons you aren't ready for me yet but your kids gonna love it".
@stevo2713 жыл бұрын
FINALLY! Finally someone started Charlemagne in proper!
@clementl.95663 жыл бұрын
One might say that Charlemagne was the founding father of the german monarchy even though some may argue that Otto the first was the actual one, however, Charlemagne was definitely not the founding father of France since we had numerous rulers before him, starting with Clovis who is regarded as the founding father of the french monarchy by french historians and the French people.
@DeutschlandMapping3 жыл бұрын
Well some French nationalist argue that the Frankish Empire and the Kingdom of France were the same with East Francia becoming independent from the Empire rather then the Empire splitting up into East and West.
@katsuieshibata74933 жыл бұрын
@@DeutschlandMapping From Hugh Capet to Phillip Augustus, all the kings titled themselves "King of Franks". Would you consider them Frankish or "French".
@DeutschlandMapping3 жыл бұрын
@@katsuieshibata7493 Charlemagne held the title of "Roman Emperor". Was he Roman? No.
@katsuieshibata74933 жыл бұрын
@@DeutschlandMapping So they were not Franks, then they were French? What makes Hugh Capet French and his predecessors not?
@skiteufr3 жыл бұрын
@@katsuieshibata7493 the Franks of Hugh Capet and the French from Philip Augustus are the same people. Only the name has been changed or modernised. The territory called Kingdom of the Franks and the people called France at the beginning of the reign of Philip are exactly the same than those at the end of his reign
@deamonomic3 жыл бұрын
What makes a country/civilization great? Is it the monuments they erect? Is it the strength of their army and military victories? Is it scientific progress? In my mind, the true judge of how good a civilization is, is how well they can care for their people.
@Dornan778023 жыл бұрын
Of course, the “Holy Roman Empire” would get divided eventually like all other pretenders to the Roman legacy. With a style of Emperor selection being just as bad as the “Byzantine” way of selecting an Emperor.
@raigarmullerson48383 жыл бұрын
One great documentary after another. Love the videos and cheers from Estonia
@AlexC-ou4ju3 жыл бұрын
Long live Charlemagne King of the Franks, father of modern Europe! Patron of the arts and education! May his vision and memory endure!
@ΘΕΟΦΑΝΩΚΟΜΝΗΝΟΣ3 жыл бұрын
Fun fact: Even do the Byzantines were the heirs of the Roman Empire, they didin't have the administrative traditions nor the customs of the Ancient Romans, while the Holy Roman Empire shared tons of traditions with the Ancient Roman culture and customs. Irene of Athens got to be a "Basilissa Satora" thanks to the Hellenistic customs and administrative practices of the Byzantines yet a women in the throne was seign as wholy wrong by the ancient Romans and Holy Romans.
@sauronmordor74943 жыл бұрын
a ok
@ΘΕΟΦΑΝΩΚΟΜΝΗΝΟΣ3 жыл бұрын
@Marcelo Henrique Soares da Silva Until 476 maybe. Afterwards the Byzantines were deeply Hellenized.
@sauronmordor74943 жыл бұрын
@Marcelo Henrique Soares da Silva ;o
@bobbyjoe11113 жыл бұрын
Best History Channel damn
@KiranSingh-zr8jr3 жыл бұрын
When "Holy Roman empire" was actually an "empire".
@heroe4803 жыл бұрын
And Holy
@JuTakii3 жыл бұрын
@UCDvp9RkhpTl45oWatdqbB0g why are you being so rude about it, just summarize it yourself or say nothing. No need to be so cross.
@Mma-basement-2157 ай бұрын
Charlemagne the great !!!
@d1a9m9i1lare3 жыл бұрын
Is it true he had 500 or 5000 Germanic warriors beheaded because they won't submit to Christianity?
@isakhanofbengal59363 жыл бұрын
How sad
@jackparker86023 жыл бұрын
Yes. It's called the Massacre of Verden. And they were all Saxon nobles.
@assyrianempire43413 жыл бұрын
Pagans killed Christians…Christians killed pagans 🤷♂️ thats history
@asgeer53513 жыл бұрын
Yes.
@BrunoOLucido28 күн бұрын
As it should, they are raiders barbarians
@robbabcock_3 жыл бұрын
Great video! I can't wait for the next installment.
@zhugeliang21213 жыл бұрын
Charlemange was the first Frenchman to unite most of Europe under his rule.
@AeneasGemini3 жыл бұрын
To be fair, he did better than the second one
@freewal3 жыл бұрын
@@AeneasGemini England was not interfering in French/Frankish affairs back then. They were too Weaks. Charlemagne reign is a golden age for Europe. Like Napoleon.
@TheKingmanIII3 жыл бұрын
Charlemagne was not French. He has little in common with the French and his relationship to them is as a man who ruled over them from a foreign Germanic elite.
@freewal3 жыл бұрын
@@TheKingmanIII French people is historically a mix of Latin and Germanic people …
@TheKingmanIII3 жыл бұрын
@@freewal No, the French are a mix of Celtic, Latin and in northern France some Germanic influences. Charlemagne was extracted from a Frankish elite which was purely Germanic, which makes him significantly more closely related to Germans, Anglo-Saxons and other Germanic groups than to the French.
@dontbemad88943 жыл бұрын
Thank you for making such great videos on historic battles.
@msaley60333 жыл бұрын
"The Holy Roman Empire was neither holy, nor Roman, nor an empire"
@robertgrochowski6873 жыл бұрын
100% truth.
@anantawibawa53153 жыл бұрын
yeah i agree with that
@BrunoOLucido28 күн бұрын
It as, did you watched the video?
@crzypopemonkey3 жыл бұрын
Sacrifice has been made to the algorithm! Been subbed already, but liked and commented. I appreciate your content, such high quality!
@illuminousarc753 жыл бұрын
Charlemagne's France: Rule over 8 countries in today times The Roman Empire: Pathetic
@HoH3 жыл бұрын
This was great - Fantastic artwork, maps & such smooth editing (and of course Charlemagne's story is spectacular 😜)
@HistoryMarche3 жыл бұрын
Thank you! 😄
@user-gt7hl3nz1n3 жыл бұрын
Living for the day when a "historical" video calls the Empire Roman and not Byzantine.
@canadious69333 жыл бұрын
@Drake Hashimoto (MV) I second your opinion. However one question I would like to put out there for anyone who would like to clarify. But since the Byzantium is the Eastern Roman Empire, why did they have an issue with a new Emperor in the west? Since before the fall of west rome, there was 2 emperors already. I get that the pope was trying to delegitimize the East but if they remembered their own history, Constantinople was always the "second" part of rome.
@maxion51093 жыл бұрын
@Drake Hashimoto (MV) yes this seems to be an ongoing argument. I dont mind the label since the ERE at that point was quite a different beast from the previous years of classical urban society around the mediterranean, at least culturally. There was a lot of draining of what was Roman or non-Christian during Justinians reforms in the 6th century, the closing of the Academy of Athens and the end of the so called "Second Sophistic". After that a new kind of identity was created for society in the east which i think with some justification can be called Byzantine.
@maxion51093 жыл бұрын
@@canadious6933 but it became the "New Rome" after the WRE fell. So there is always just one "Rome". But it's true there were two emperors and before that the Tetrarchy after Diocletians reform with a senior and junior emperor in both west and east. I assume this is about an issue that there could only be one Christian emperor after Constantine the Great but im not entirely sure. Well Charlemagne was probably viewed as an imposter by the Byzantines as this Frankish strongman could not claim any direct line as they could in the east
@swaythegod5812 Жыл бұрын
Greeks aren’t Roman Constantinople isn’t Rome They spoke Greek not Roman Latin
@daegudiva3 жыл бұрын
A most excellent video! Well done
@denniscleary75803 жыл бұрын
My wife is actually a distant descendant of Charlemagne