Would have been really nice if this had a 2.5G SFP or SFP+ port but seems like a great addition to the lineup.
@sybren-srb2 ай бұрын
why would it need that?
@m4rk3J2 ай бұрын
For example, you can bond 2 Ethernet ports, but it is not the same. 2.5 Gbps ethernet would be better.
@djdrastic12 ай бұрын
@@sybren-srb Currently have 1 Gbit fiber SFP connectivity between my house and my partners home/office building. The IP Cams alone around and in that office run close to 100 Mbit running 24/7. Add in the NAS/Backup Server in the home and streaming its easy to cap out that link as we track it with librenms. You would be surprised how much throughput you can get on a 160 Mhz channel even on a 2 stream device.
@hanamynetwork2 ай бұрын
SFP cage won't fit the case. It will go out to the front like someone sticking out their wi*n*rs lol
@ussul65242 ай бұрын
just 2x2.5G ports would be better.
@bensonwu39012 ай бұрын
no 2.5G ports, are you kidding me?
@jamesnorton65182 ай бұрын
What R you offering YOU ? What U do not understood ? He said for those who needs strong WiFi The ƒ u talking 4 ?
@ve552 ай бұрын
I really don't get you guys ... please explain the missing 2.5G or SFP+ Port. Do i need to build a 3 Port Port-channel only to meet the throughput of the 4x4 Wifi? Please do not update the cAP ax or wAP ax if you not putting MU-MIMO in it - it would not be a reason to buy. The recent wAP ax did not convinced me to go WiFi 6 even with AX3000 which cAP ax does not have.
@ionutmosoiu69002 ай бұрын
It is shame that this expensive product will only shipped with 1 GB interfaces ...😢
@synonum2 ай бұрын
you lost me at 1 Gig LAN , this is 2024 mate
@wojciechkonowrocki372 ай бұрын
I was thrilled to see this on my page, but the lack of 2.5GbE port really kills it. Hap ax3 has 2.5gb port and ax1800. This one has faster wireless ax3000, but slower port for uplink = not worth it.
@aliancemd2 ай бұрын
"This one has faster wireless ax3000" - it doesn't have faster wireless. I don't know a single client device that has 4x4. Almost all modern laptops and mobile devices use 2x2, which hAP ax3 covers. There is an argument to make that it might be able to handle more concurrent clients but you won't see "faster wireless"
@wojciechkonowrocki372 ай бұрын
@@aliancemdlol yes that’s true I thought it supports 160mhz so for example iPhone 15 pro with 2x2 mimo would work. Still I think 2,5gb port in such device is a requirement
@ThomasTomiczekАй бұрын
@@aliancemd "I don't know a single client device that has 4x4." - but multipole devices....?
2 ай бұрын
I would love to see also "cAP PRO ax" with the same SoC as this product and the current form factor. :) Thank you guys!
@beyondearth64182 ай бұрын
My new motherboard comes with a 5gbps lan. Why are your router products stuck on 1gbps? Give us stronger routers already, my god...
@mauriciohenriques38202 ай бұрын
Most of the models miss a true PoE 802.11af/at input port!!
@Christos92 ай бұрын
Are you planning an update for the RB5009UPr+S+IN ?
@svetlinzarev34532 ай бұрын
Please release an update of rb5009 with 8x 2.5 gbe ports and 2sfp+ ports + 25% faster cpu :d pretty please
@mctscott1232 ай бұрын
I just want one with two SFP+ ports, based on their hardware, it doesn't seem like that much to ask for.
@apalrdsadventures2 ай бұрын
I would love to see a new wAP AX, I really like that form factor
@wint3rmut32 ай бұрын
Is there going to be an AX update of the Audience or a new 3-band device for wireless bridging?
@aliancemd2 ай бұрын
It's not on FCC, so, most likely, it won't be anytime soon. Chateau PRO ax has been on FCC for ~4 months+, for example.
@shavenne2 ай бұрын
Sooo ... while I'm switching to MikroTik switches and routers everywhere it seems for wifi I still need to stay at the Unifi devices. MikroTik is waaay to slow getting to the new wifi standards. I mean..: Wifi 7 is out for so long now and they're still releasing one Wifi 6 device after another without any signs that there's a Wifi 7 device coming soon. :(
@SiBex_ovh2 ай бұрын
The same here but I still wait for 48x10XG version to replace all SG200/300-52 ... companies buy a Laptop with AMD CPU who provide 2,5Gb... buy Mac stations who have 10GbEthernet...
@XtrAMassivE2 ай бұрын
That's what we're doing, deploying Mikrotik across our clients but if there's a need for good quality wifi we put Unifi. Mikrotik's wifi is just annoying to work with, especially CAPsMan it just plain sucks. Only clients that have wifi issues are those with Mikrotik wifi. Also i'm not counting on Mikrotik jumping on Wifi 7 train any time soon.
@SiBex_ovh2 ай бұрын
@@XtrAMassivE For my cases a MikroTik not solve problems, this cases was not solve, for me a MikroTik works until you use a device who have problems :) I know it's definistion of not work :). But some security alarm systems cannot take dhcp re-lease, some card terminals cannot connect and we only see in debug wifi 1line that mac try connect and nothing more - we cannot solve that problems by years and we just use unifi as standard bcs it's just work with anything what client have.
@AzamatOverclockers2 ай бұрын
Hello guys it's cool! I will definitely try! But when there will be a cap wifi 6e or wifi7 4x4 MIMO. Users want 6 Ghz
@merkkgАй бұрын
I bought one of these changed from ax3 to chateau ax pro but i feel wifo performance of the ax3 is better. The AX3 has a better range as well as the wifi itself is more stable. The whole family complains wifi just stops with the Chateua AX Pro. I guess its newer so maybe some bugs to fix
@mircea83422 ай бұрын
Mikrotik need to line up with other vendors in some equipment. Wifi 7, ap wifi 7 with poe in and 2.5 gb port. Switch with 2.5gb poe port. Latest switch has br++ with tons of power budget but .. when use this power if has only gb port. Other useful equipemnt to bring up is 8 port with 2.5 gb and poe. Refresh version of crs326-16gb (new modern cpu, internal psu, remove swos and some ram ) will be other nice thing like hex refresh
@eW0LF2 ай бұрын
Guys, cmon, where is SFP+?
@zc93442 ай бұрын
You really should fire your product manager, this guy couldn’t stop himself from designing bunches of ridiculous segment products. People just want things with all they want.
@MOOOS-REWFEWETRGTEerTGTRGRHRHR2 ай бұрын
Where is the 2.5Gbe port!??????? What a weird design!!!!!
@hifigraz2 ай бұрын
When will there be a weatherproof poe 5G solution?
@mykhailoskrypkin22102 ай бұрын
Are you planning to upgrade the classic HAP AC (RB962UiGS) with SFP to AX?
@Kite_Guy2 ай бұрын
+1, would love to see this rather sooner than later
@linksrv2 ай бұрын
CPU from 2019 year?
@pepin20892 ай бұрын
When BE Hap Router? Comon guys its 2024
@MDJGyurgeiz2 ай бұрын
Chateau 4g it had the 2.5 gigabit port. this how was it possible not to include at least two 2.5 Gigabit ports. It is useless
@MustaMT2 ай бұрын
So the less capable hap AX^3 which should be the pro / flagship device has 2.5Gbps interface and this one which fills the hap AX^3 gaps doesn’t? You also market the new capsman but the highest end wifi device is in desktop form factor and no multi gig…?! Serious guys, the whole product lineup needs to be rethought. Willing to help if necessary…!
@Saba-jr8yb2 ай бұрын
Would have bought this if it had 2 2.5G ethernet ports, WAN/LAN.
@85Slvr2 ай бұрын
is only mimo or mu-mimo?
@aliancemd2 ай бұрын
MU-MIMO. Can search for IPQ8074, it says: `Features: Uplink scheduling, Advanced QoS, TxBF, MU-MIMO, OFDMA, Qualcomm® Wi-Fi SON`
@pepin20892 ай бұрын
Should be MUMIMO, 802.11 AX says that. Should.
@sarq12 ай бұрын
Do you want my heart? Good WiFi is good but...1Gbps ports were good enough 15 years ago :(
@tutugreen_dayo2 ай бұрын
Ok, show me other options....
@randomcrap96472 ай бұрын
Just do 2x2 MIMO 160 MHz finally.
@Itimo01De2 ай бұрын
wap ax and netmetal ax support it
@randomcrap96472 ай бұрын
This is not true at least for wAP ax - according to official site, its max wireless throughput is 1200 Mbps, which means 1x160 MHz or 2x80 MHz.
@Itimo01De2 ай бұрын
@@randomcrap9647 I think the website is wrong since the brochure mentions AX3000 with 2x2 MIMO. But then again the brochure says 2.5dbi antenna and the website says 7dbi
@stevenprodriguez2 ай бұрын
No SFP or 2.5G and no WiFi 7, no thanks.
@aleph-ukraine2 ай бұрын
Wi-Fi 7 time
@DanPellegrino4862 ай бұрын
Yikes, at least give a 2.5Gb for running to a switch or multigig WAN. I get leaving SFP+ out of a more consumer targeted device, but...
@ThatHz-2 ай бұрын
Not WiFi 7?
@premik692 ай бұрын
hahaha.. no 2.5g ports, no SFP+, no wifi 7, 1GB RAM, 128 MB NAND for the PROS!!! What a joke
@ussul65242 ай бұрын
wifi 7 when? TP-link BE230 is beating you ap man. + it has 2 2G ports
@SiBex_ovh2 ай бұрын
Isn't this video proof that MikroTik admitted to slowing down WiFi due to too little RAM in other devices? This would explain why the loaded OpenWRT has better wifi on the same hardware. I hope this is not like with RB951 when a CPU limit us with WIFI speed and anyone not say about that limitation, new we discover that RAM have matter.
@SiBex_ovh2 ай бұрын
I hope that MikroTik add a "Wireless test results" next to "Ethernet test results" or "IPsec test results" what show us what ax device can give us, this should be done long time ago.
@tcsoft2 ай бұрын
@@SiBex_ovhI think Mikrotik would be suprised by the results....
@inrayАй бұрын
No SFP. no 2.5Mbit ethernet, no wifi7, a seven years old RF chipset, no 160MHz, 128MB NAND, in another big-eared plastic blob and all these for the PROS? 😀 Come on Mikrotik folks, I'm sure you can do better...
@mikek52062 ай бұрын
Weakish CPU and almost no RAM (RAM prices are SO cheap) with outdated radio tech. WiFi 7 still hasn’t been ratified yet afaik but it is already the new standard since the spec has been finalized (Ubiquiti just released WiFi 7 devices). If this is your best WiFi offering you guys are behind the curve. WiFi 7 is a huge improvement there’s no reason to be releasing new WiFi 6 products at this point-especially as your top of the line offering. Oof. Love your products but this one is a miss and sadly isn’t going to sell very well unless you make the price like 50 USD.
@aliancemd2 ай бұрын
Ubiquiti did release WiFi 7 devices and people complain that IoT devices cannot connect to those(specifically single chip devices).
@zkrystian29 күн бұрын
You say this device is for advanced users. Great. If that’s the case, where are the 2.5Gbps ports at a minimum? Are we still stuck in 2010? Hey Mikrotik, you can do better!
@msdevel2 ай бұрын
you must be crazy :D mikrotik is continue with failing. missing 2.5gb port. missing wifi 7 etc. this is pretty obsolete everything
@dori-r5h2 ай бұрын
Sūdīgi, ka viss angļu valoda klausos un redzu kā bulis uz sarkanu lupatu un neko nesaprotu itkā ražo latvijā ,bet angliski ...bē.. bē.. bē ....visu preci mikrotik ko ražo latvijā ,latviski....oooo,...vai...0000 ??? Atbildēt
@sceic2 ай бұрын
stingy
@merkkgАй бұрын
I bought one of these changed from ax3 to chateau ax pro but i feel wifi performance of the ax3 is better. The AX3 has a better range as well as the wifi itself is more stable. The whole family complains wifi just stops with the Chateua AX Pro. I guess its newer so maybe some bugs to fix