“Cheating Scandal!” || Daniel Naroditsky SHOCKS Magnus Carlsen w/ 100% Accuracy! (Kramnik Accuses!)

[@abababa7483]

I don't think any cheating was involved. On some days you simply play better or worse than usual.

[@drmikechess]

Agreed

[@RayT70]

No one pays much attention to his accusations anymore.

[@drmikechess]

Poor Kramnik haha, I think he's going off the deep end, I do like that he's coaching Hans Niemann though!

[@RayT70]

@drmikechess Yeah, interesting duo there. The king of chess cheating accusations and the king of chess cheating scandals 👍

[@bradspaugh9827]

How is it 100% accurate? There were lots of ? Marks

[@jaybingham3711]

Absolute atrocious idiotic clickbait nonsense. If this dude is fine with stooping so low with this, I'll bet he wouldn't bat an eye at making use of engine assistance while playing. And yet he goes off on Kramnik without one iota of irony. JFC.

[@Lemaus433]

Yeah this dudes favorite chess player is Hans and he is just a click bait content creator. Otherwise known as shit content creators. Absolute no dignity or respect for the people who's time he wastes with bullshit like this. I have told KZbin to not recommend this shitty creator but here we are yet again...

[@drmikechess]

@@jaybingham3711 Sorry to hear you don't like the title brother, but even you have to admit this was an absolutely incredible game by Daniel Naroditsky against Magnus Carlsen! And as for you accusing me of cheating, you sound like Vladimir Kramnik LOL!

[@jaybingham3711]

@@drmikechess But you straight up lied brother. It's not like you're a beginner patzer incapable of understanding of what precisely "100% Accuracy" means in terms of a game of chess. Under what circumstance(s) do you find blatantly lying like this is acceptable/justifiable?

[@kgsphinx]

The eval bar swung around as much as one of my games.. no way it was 100% accurate.

[@discostu483]

It’s unfortunate what Kramnic is doing to his legacy he was such a great champion.

[@drmikechess]

Agreed, I hope he switches his focus to the chess instead of the cheating soon!

[@unfixablegop]

There's a second underappreciated effect of cheating: the fear of playing a fair game that's so good that others will call you a cheater. It keeps players from playing "crazy intuition" moves, because what if the the computer says that's the top choice? Better to to play a decent "rational" move than to get accused if the intuition turns out to be correct. So the fear of cheating also messes with the games of honest players.

[@drmikechess]

That is a great point

[@foolmenow00]

Woweee! One of the very rare games that Magmaximus doesn't even get in a c'heck' on his opponent! Black's B-a6 with Rook coming down to be sacked (after White castled long) was the kiss of death for King Carlson!

[@drmikechess]

Yes a great game!

[@luciferlight5082]

Vladimir kramnik accuses himself of cheating after his amazing win .

[@drmikechess]

hahaha

[@noahbirdrevolution]

It's a 3min game. Magnus made a few poor choices that gave Danya the advantage. It happens everyday among non-cheaters.

[@drmikechess]

Agreed, Danya played really well though!

[@vidicisthegoat5444]

Why am I watching a 400 elo talk about chess

[@lordhelps1]

lol

[@jimmy_iKoN]

😂

[@felixchien1664]

Yeah, I was wondering if he was correct at 11:29. He says the pawn should take the bishop but then that loses Daniel's rook and attacks the queen

[@drmikechess]

LOL Haters gonna hate, I'm rated 2,000 online for reference

[@felixchien1664]

@@drmikechess then can you explain why you think @11:20 the best move for black was to take white's bishop with the pawn?

[@zelareka]

why are people so stupid, just demand a second camera from those online players and no more doubts. why dont they do something so easy

[@builderphill1361]

No need to pander to kramnik with his constant moving of the goal post

[@drmikechess]

Maybe Kramnik wants attention haha, yes I think chess.com is using some setups like that for the titled tuesday tournaments etc.

[@SmartWatches-xu6ri]

@@builderphill1361 instead of saying that there's no need, let's accept that he is a former world champion and just out of basic morals of a functioning society, we should listen to all sides incase there's something we missed and do something "so easy" as zelareka said i have kept out of this for so long but it's crazy how much of an echo-chamber there seems to be with the sole purpose of making kramnik seem like a lunatic

[@fyre1borne]

The game of the year is stockfish vs Lela, and she pulls off a 4 piece sacrifice and gets a stalemate position when the position was +4 for stockfish. THAT IS THE GAME OF THE YEAR!!! Webster have you been?

[@drmikechess]

Maybe I'll analyze that game next! Thanks for the tip!

[@lordhelps1]

What is your chess rating?

[@drmikechess]

2,000 on Lichess

[@beereaucrat3233]

Loose the dogs of war on Krammy.

[@drmikechess]

haha

[@allankaunga9863]

Ask Hikaru about Danya, he's a beast. Give him some respect please. No cheating involved here...

[@drmikechess]

Agreed! Danya is a blitz monster!

[@zacharysherry2910]

Someone please make a meme where Kramnik pops in from the side of the screen 😂😂😂

[@johnmillett2831]

Kramnik should just stop playing chess if he is going to be such a whiny Bishop about it.

[@lgmnowkondo938]

Without knowing anything about cheating in chess...online chess cheating is rampant...and I'm sure it happens at the highest levels as well. People can't help themselves but to chear.

[@drmikechess]

Agreed, but Danya is as legit as it gets, I think Kramnik's accusations against him specifically are baseless

[@JM-db8ez]

Why do you keep saying Carlsen is SHOCKED in your video titles? Is this TMZ or something? C'mon already, clickbait titles are meh. How many of your last 10 videos say SHOCKED in the title? ...And the other four are pretty dramatic too. Why, do you think your audience needs this level of exaggeration? Dunno, you do great in your videos for the most part, no need to clutter things up with overly demonstrative titles. Plus do you really think Magnus gets SHOCKED so much? Nobody does and that also raises an eyebrow regarding your need to clickbait your videos. Just my 2c, you do you, just something that seems trite to me given the repetition and hyperbolic tone.

[@TheManaLord]

It's click bait for emotional driven dumbs

[@abababa7483]

What's wrong with that? Take it easy.

[@drmikechess]

Thank you for your advice, but I will continue to hand pick the absolute most shocking chess games I can possibly find, and continue to use titles that reflect how absolutely shocking these games are 😂😂😂

[@rollingstone1784]

Wrong!! It is not cheating, it is Voodoo. At 12:00, Magnus blundered from 3.5 to 0.0 - that was not Dannys cheat, but Dannys Voodoo. At 13:50, next Voodoo! 0.0 to -5.0. Danny must be a warlock - it's simply impossible that Magnus blunders twice in that manner… ;-)

[@mrhatman675]

I actually bet 1000 that daniel would win and he freaking won!!!!!!!!

[@rollingstone1784]

@@mrhatman675 so, you are also a cheater or a warlock???

[@TheDedloc]

I do think Vlad has lost it a bit. But also I just think he is a lot more invested into the sport of chess than I am.. I mean he IS a former world champion and a much better chess player than I could ever dream to be. I got my own suspicions about Danya a while back and I just simply stopped consuming the content. What gave me bad vibes was exactly what Kramnik and you mention... and I can see it and I can see what Kramnik is talking about. What's happening is not someone looking away from the screen to calculate it's him routinely looking away at a certain spot. I know as a dumb viewer that I cant prove anything at all and I'm not trying to. I don't care and I don't have skin in the game. But Kramnik is someone that dedicated his life to chess and so he perhaps takes it a bit more serious. I've only had bad vibes about a few players that I can think of from watching their content... and I don't think it is a coincidence that the former world chess champion is calling out the people I've had suspicions about myself. Mr Kramnik hasn't influenced my opinions in way. I had my mind made up before all this lol there are just some players that I think are clever and smart enough and have the means to find ways to cheat and not play fair. Maybe its not a lot... maybe its only a few games here and there. I don't really care lol I watch people that I don't get bad vibes from and that's all there really is to it. I know we cant prove online cheating one way or another.

[@leslieaw2576]

Such a long post just to explain you weren't influenced by Kramnik? Surely there's no need for that? It's ok, there will always be for and against. To each his own. However, Kramnik should know that once a toiletgate, always a toiletgate. He has to explain his own case first which he never did, and accusing others doesn't automatically means he's as "clean" as he wants people to think.

[@drmikechess]

Yea cheating in online chess is obviously a big deal if it happens, Kramnik is a legend so his opinions carry more weight than the average person's, but at the same time he is accusing absolutely everyone, and accusing someone of cheating by itself is a big deal as it can hurt their reputation. So I think Kramnik is being a bit reckless here overall

[@tunisiamyluv5953]

you certainly don't know Danya. He is a beast tactically along Alireza. All other players come next

[@drmikechess]

Yes Danya is a tactical monster! Very good blitz player

[@resu2026]

Not 100% accuracy, Instead Clickbait. Dislike.

[@KlausToth]

wow! that for sure was an entertaining game. beautiful and creative. thank you for the presentation.

[@drmikechess]

Thank you brother! Much appreciated!

[@wm2537]

Kramkrap needs to be ignored

[@RydarkVoyager]

Kramnik would probabily accuse his own MOTHER of cheating. BTW, I love your commentary, Dr. Mike!

[@oneputt4152]

watching kramnik is just sad now

[@drmikechess]

He used to be such a chess legend!

[@carlhopkinson]

Cheater.

[@kdlittle88]

Wait, why do you keep looking at the wall?

[@drmikechess]

I'm not sure what you mean, I have the chess board and the move annotations that I go back and forth with?

[@CiinnaSiinna]

tell a joke :kramnik

[@drmikechess]

I don't get your comment haha

[@CiinnaSiinna]

@@drmikechess A: please,tell me a joke B: Crymnik

[@understanditok]

How come taking the bishop with the pawn is best option at 11:29, he would lose his rook this way

[@travislizer9581]

The following move would bring the queen down to a2 with a check. The king only has two squares on the first rank, and the queen can move to the spot protected by the pawn for checkmate. Alternativly, magnus can block with his rook, but the pawn would take it, and be protected by the queen with one move for a second queen.

[@travislizer9581]

You could also consider the king moving to the third rank and taking the pawn, but then the queen would move to check the king by taking the pawn on the second rank while under protection of the remaining rook. From there the king would move up the board for a check by the remaining rook, and be walked back into a skewer of the white queen that would fall to the rook.

[@nevinkuser9892]

Good explanation. Interesting game. Surprising Magnus didn't see the pawn move. I can't believe it. 🤮

[@christopherroddis8923]

Great game ❤

[@drmikechess]

Thank you brother!

[@kevo1441]

I believe Vladimir

[@zelareka]

Bc8 looks interesting

[@rakshitsinha8721]

Kramnik want publicity thats his problem. 🤪🤪🤪 Magnuse do blunder daniel take advantage thats it. 💪😤💪

[@184b7]

Nice video