China's Radical Stealth Ship Showcases New Technology

China experimental naval ship has started sea trials. We discuss all the interesting devices found onboard, which are new to the Chinese Navy.
Want to support my work?
/ eurasianavalinsight
www.buymeacoff...
Keywords: PLAN, PLA, frigate, corvette, Luneberg lens, military

[@redblueyankee8343]

What a good design I hope Vietnam can buy it to replace our current old Petyas. And love to my Sinosphere brothers

[@duongle1606]

I don't think Vietnam will ever buy Chinese military equipment any time soon. Vietnam has been balancing their relationship with US and China. Buying Chinese military equipment is against their policies

[@Shipspotting_Vietnam]

Vietnam will never buy weapons from China!

[@sleefy2343]

@@duongle1606well Chinese don’t sell their weapons though They would rather sell useful things like things that are not weapons

[@szh4494]

@@duongle1606 Thailand has stuff from both US and China. They also do drills with both countries

[@duongle1606]

@@szh4494 what does that have to do with with Vietnam?

[@phils4634]

With China's massive investment in robotics, I wonder how long it will be before we see at least partial robotic assembly in their shipyards? A potential future where high quality, absolutely reproducible shipping is churned out with the same ease (and speed) of commercial trucks and buses? Big savings on finished vessels for commercial buyers, and possibly an "almost production line" scale of output for PLA naval assets, especially smaller size vessels.

[@douginorlando6260]

I read somewhere it’s already here. China’s Cruise ship rooms for thousands of tourists were already being finished with robots. It might be the next cruise ship being constructed, not the last ship.

[@phils4634]

@@douginorlando6260 Extensive use of robotics have led China from being a major net importer of cars to being THE world's largest EV producer in less than a decade, with BYD now being probably the world's largest "consumer-spec" EV producer. There would appear to be no fundamental reasons why such "economies of extensive automation" cannot be applied to shipping. This would also apply to repair too - obviously of strategic interest and importance in a wartime scenario.

[@sustainablerenewableintegr8311]

America will be having bloody diarrhea if China ever reached that level 😂

[@xuansu9036]

You wouldn’t see it in the shipyard itself. It’s more likely to be used in the factories that provide modules to the yard. Putting ship together requires a lot of internal work that large robots aren’t suitable for, and probably a lot of variation that need to be fixed while been assembled. Modules on the other hand, are much smaller and could take advantage of robots to reduce those variations.

[@王焉-v4u]

​@@phils4634中国的老百姓比以前富有一些了，那些非常辛苦的工作年轻人根本不愿意干。所以用机器人代替是必然的。

[@francescozambaldi8212]

I'm not expert in naval warfare but this is a really good looking warship. Bravo China

[@Tanchin-k7y]

Just a toy warship .

[@francescozambaldi8212]

@@Tanchin-k7y Sincerely i don't knw, as said i'm not an expert by any mean

[@liuliwuyugmail]

​@@Tanchin-k7y I mean yeah it's in the name of the thing? But still good looking.

@@Tanchin-k7y Shut up CIA bot. Tell your boss Bob you suck at your job

[@sohailasghar8684]

​@@Tanchin-k7yhow could you know that? I mean west , specially US compete with china , now everyone saying its crap , When its crap , why US built alliences against china

[@jinz948]

Thanks for the continuous updates, thank you 🎉🎉🎉

[@250_YZ]

Mission réussie sur la lune, puis ce nouveau navire hitech. Et en projet, le vaisseau spatial de 800 mètres de long. À l'avenir, les universités chinoises attireront plus d'étudiants du monde entier, que les universités américaines.

[@davidbowden8362]

At least one can study in China without protesters.

[@Excalabur50]

From what I could see in one of the photos you showed of the wake of the ship you can see the exhaust out the back of the mast area, so it doesn't look like it has a water level exhaust, which stands to reason why the mast is blackened.

[@mysygisun3335]

確かにそうですね、 マスト後部の黒ずみは。ディーゼル廃棄に因る黒ずみに見えますね。 当然ガスタービンの排気もマスト後部に出るという事😊でしょう。

[@he-man168]

wow! it,s so smooth

[@tvgerbil1984]

It looks more like a mini version of the Japanese Mogami Class Frigate than anything else. The Mogami's have relatively low price tag for mass production. It makes perfect sense for China to build this experimental ship first to iron out design issues before mass production begins.

[@timothychung4811]

Pretty much 055 updated.

[@cn-digu]

你脑子没事？

[@xtt-o8y]

傻逼

[@ivanborgia3384]

Are you serious? There‘re two facts: 1. The Mogami-class still has no VLS 2. The Mogami-class is a class of ships built with civilian standards for mass deployment.

[@jogo798]

Why not use Integrated Propulsion System instead of Combined Gas and Diesel Propulsion ?

[@FreeSpeech-z6j]

C C P are not smart enough to copy advanced semi conductors, they would not know how to invent nuclear powered propulsion

[@hughmungus2760]

no reason that it isn't already doing so. IEP tends to be buggy but since its a technology test platform reliability isn't a concern.

[@cabasadefogo9533]

What a beautiful design. Meanwhile US navy DDGX not scheduled til 2032. The new billion dollar frigate Constitution class based on existing FRAMM design from Italy has been delayed due to faulty design changes per Business Insider. Yes you heard correct, they are so incompetent that they tried to change the existing FRAMM design, but instead of finishing the changes before building starts. They started building thinking they can fit the design changes while ship is constructing. LOLOL vs PLAN building experimental ships to test design then fully implementing them.

[@hughmungus2760]

aestetically its very much a 2020s design while the constellation looks like something produced at the turn of the millennium.

[@Triggatra4258]

Are you paid to suck china's d***? Or you love the taste? 😂😂 BOTH.

[@ragabara1031]

Reading through other comments, I think this needs to be said: 1. This Chinese ship is a proof of concept 2. The visual characteristics being discussed may only be one major differentiator for the project stakeholders 3. The covered concepts don't need to be restricted to the technological domain. They can be of a wide range: economic, industrial, fiscal, manpower, combat, etc. on the tactical, operational, and strategic levels. We don't know the priorities of this project, so there's no point in dismissing it based on surface-level information. All we know is that the Chinese have decided that the concepts being incorporated into the ship are worthy enough to be proven.

[@williamblomster2387]

this is all bullshit

[@mysygisun3335]

船級として056Aの名称が見られるようですので、 主船体船型は、056型のままで、 056型の上部をステルス線形とした、主砲のステルス化、 高速発揮用のウオータージェット化が主なようですね。 056型コルベット自体は、全艦海警艦移管をするということでしょうか。

[@tonysia6474]

Great ship. This will change China naval ships designs in the future to adapt to the modern sea warfare where stealth tech will rule the wave. Great China. 🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳👍👍👍👍👍♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️

[@AmirShafeek]

Love from Florida 🇺🇲👍🏾🇨🇳

[@iamscoutstfu]

5:03 That looks like a water line exhaust plume to me. But theres also exhaust near the rear of the bridge. It may be running both? It looks more like an LVO testbed than anything else. No wet deck doors, no mission bay, no actual landing pad or hangar doors for the helo. It looks like it only has the equipment necessary to sail and test radar returns on common PLAN equipment.

[@tgsgardenmaintenance4627]

The designation of warships differ around the world, and can be quite confusing! For instance, the type 55 is called a destoyer, but is clearly a cruiser, my own country had three throughdeck cruisers that were clearly small aircraft carriers! Many so called frigates today, could also be categorised as destroyers !

[@douginorlando6260]

So instead of a radar reflection the size of a ship, its reflection is only the size of a bus or a car? Or even a refrigerator? I don’t get the idea behind stealth for huge ships … once in line of sight of radar, how can it hide? Even if it reduces reflection by 99.9% it’s still big

[@xiaofengwang9541]

Do you know that the Earth is round?

[@Cannoli_JJ]

减少被击中的概率或者直接让雷达无法瞄准。🧐

[@UsaidAhmed-mb5ws]

Lets say you get in on radar and you want to hit in but its moving and they thing you are hitting it with requires guidance system it cant guide it self correctly if radar signature is not accurate i think

[@UsaidAhmed-mb5ws]

​@@Cannoli_JJyes

[@mydad156]

It present in radar is the same size of hundred of fishing ships near it, difficult to distinguish it from fishing ships around from radar.

[@LaminatedLama]

Love your videos. Would love it you wanted to cover other parts of the PLA

[@multipolarworldorder]

The previous type 56B corvette was a low cost ship and had separate anti ship missile pods and no VLS. It was designed for anti submarine operations close to China so a VLS system was not required. It had a towed array and helicopter. This new proto type looks like it is to replace the type 56B and it has a VLS system which extends it operation potential.

[@ivanborgia3384]

Not entirely like that, the Type 056 was primarily designed to replace outdated missile boats and patrol vessels, not strong enough on anti submarine. It's just a transitional model and most of them have now been transferred to the Coast Guard.

[@multipolarworldorder]

@@ivanborgia3384 The 56A were transferred to the Coast Guard. They had no anti submarine towed array like the 56B.

[@mala7794]

0:40 u can see the soot from the exhaust. it dosent seem to have a water cooled one like german and french frigates

[@fernandofernandito3055]

Gas and diesel use two propellers obviously go faster that single propeller... This channel is good to give away what PLAN has under their sleeves...

[@shengzhong2662]

试验舰，用来测试各种子系统，新技术

[@Tanubtanu]

Look like a testing ship to test out Visby-class's radar characteristics, but the idea of a stealth ship along with carrier battlegroup seems dumb unless they are working on a stealth version of Type 22 missile boat which makes more sense.

[@but_at_what_cost]

海军真正地决战军舰，恰恰是076这样地小平顶和这种小型控制成本地隐身防空舰。

[@不死原飴羽]

yeah, stealth don't mean much in battlegroup, but it always good when it needs to operate independently

[@williamblomster2387]

need to build a higher mast to be able to see over the horizon like pre WW2 battleships

[@but_at_what_cost]

@@williamblomster2387 地平线的事交给长续航无人机

[@alexpan8138]

this is a test platform for the "Dreadnaught" 全能舰 concept developed by scientist Ma Weiming , it will be more than 10000 ton , have Rail Gun, strategic Laser and Tactic Laser, numerous VLS which can launch all konds of hypersonic missiles, and can be a command center for Drones. Carriers might become slow moving targets during conflict of great powers, and are only useful against small countries with insufficient missile powers.

[@寒鱼]

以后会不会放大作为全能舰，缩小作为无人舰

[@wision888]

absolutely

[@olov87]

CN really like Swedish Corvette style 🧐

[@multipolarworldorder]

Do away with the front Gun and extend the raised platform so the number of VLS cells can be increased to 48 at least. Make sure there is a towed sonar array and dipping sonar as well.

[@hughmungus2760]

interesting concept. A mini arsenal ship that costs much less than a submarine or destroyer but has at least heavy frigate levels of firepower. It'd have to work as part of a battlegroup though since its sensors wouldn't be able to make full use of all that firepower

[@ivanborgia3384]

@@hughmungus2760 PLAN has conducted some relevant research on arsenal ship, but it doesn't seem to fit their system.

[@hughmungus2760]

@@ivanborgia3384 The PLAN seems to prefer to disperse their risk rather than put all their eggs in one basket like the US.

[@ivanborgia3384]

@@hughmungus2760 In their concept, it is called "technological reserve," exploring all possibilities, equipping suitable technologies, and archiving unsuitable ones for future restart of research or reference.

[@alexpan8138]

这是为 马伟明院士的 全能舰 做测试呢

[@fatdoi003]

this maybe the next gen design for all types of warships.... all they need is stretch the boat out and wider....

[@craylin]

Only small ships need ultimate stealth design.Large ships cannot be stealthy.

[@timothychung4811]

I am curious if they will do that and if this is a study for a new model more powerful than 055 they have talked about.

[@royssche]

Visby class?

[@dorpus]

The USA built those kind of ships 10 years ago and abandoned them because they were too fragile and constantly broke down.

[@ianchen8582]

What? Are you referring to the Freedom class littoral combat ship?

[@杨丞琳吃大便]

放你妈那狗屁

[@waynef9314]

It's there own copy of the Zumwalt Destroyer's. You can see that they didn't want to make it to noticable. So the front of the ship is like others.

[@UniversalMusicLtd584]

Looks more like Visby to me. Like the child of Visby and Zumwalt...

[@lancewood1410]

The west always thinks they know more than even the manufacturer. I'll call it whatever i want because i made it :)

[@BrandyHeng007]

Semi Submarine, hiding below sea level, so it's truly sheath design

[@OperaRotas-ik2xz]

Excellent 👍

[@Erik-rp1hi]

I think Naval News is good. They sure travel the world. They get interviews with higher ups.

[@arthurchen8162]

I just guess that this new beautiful ship is for stealth function test.

[@kesai119]

Experimental ships, our style is that the first ship is usually used for experiments to verify some parameters and standards. Generally speaking, a third ship of the same type is the production version.

[@arthurchen8162]

@@kesai119 Thank you. I hope all tests are going well

[@arveduilastking546]

It has some similarities with the swedish stealth corvette.

[@dennyliu7494]

The back of the Visby Class Corvette is an over-extended helicopter platform, not very practical.

[@nicolamastascusa8173]

I mean, can it be considered that the PLAN uses the term 'light frigate' to indicate a 'corvette' class because Chinese lacks a specific term for 'corvette'? There are specific terms for 'frigate', 'destroyer' and 'cruiser', which are literally translated as 护卫舰 'protector vessel', 驱逐舰 'expulsion vessel', and 巡洋舰 'cruise vessel', respectively. Is there a specific Chinese term for 'corvette that you know?

[@陈一發兒是我老婆]

Yes，中國护卫舰是指擁有防空，對舰功擊，反潛性能的2000 －5000吨水平的綜合保护舰，5000吨以上的叫驱逐舰，沒有設定巡洋艦＇

[@ivanborgia3384]

Conceptually, PLAN has a series of hierarchical indicators to classify ships into different categories 1st Class: Aircraft carrier, battleship, cruiser and nuclear submarine 2nd Class: Destroyers, frigates, conventional submarines and large landing ships 3rd Class: Large missile boats, anti-submarine boats, mine sweepers and medium-sized landing ships Sure in Chinese there‘s no such term for corvette, it's called light frigate(轻型护卫舰) or patrol vessel(巡逻舰) sometimes but it's informal, there is only one type in the strict sense which is Frigate(护卫舰).

[@BrandonMeyer1641]

Resembles design traits of the zumwalt. Stealth of surface vessels is only advantageous under certain conditions.

[@陈一發兒是我老婆]

大船隐身就很多余，最不經打的裝備， 1. 坦克，2直升机，3大船

[@damjanforjanic]

Looks crazy good...

[@stevek4813]

The raised deck for the VLS would also reduce the firing arc of the bow gun

[@Daedy]

Not really. Note how tapered the platform is. It's clear they've already accounted for that.

[@hughmungus2760]

my primary concern is that getting rid of the CWIS makes it quite vulnerable to swarming drone attack. It also seems to lack any ability to deal with USVs which are proving to be quite a menace in littoral waters.

[@justme6275]

amazing looking ship 🥰

[@patrickrain1914]

Chinese navy: lol.My new toy🎉

[@LIONIQ-foxhound]

LONG LIVE CHINA LONG LIVE PLA...

[@psiregar]

Looks like Sweden’s Visby corvette to me

[@AccordGTR]

Great target for Brahmos

[@christophmahler]

After the cancellation of the Zumwalt-class program and the LCS programs, maybe the US Navy should by it's cruiser replacements from China, instead of Italy...

[@WhyyouSodesperate]

Buying weapons from enemies is not possible dude Do you think USA want to buy ship that possibly to be TROJAN HORSE or SABOTAGED And no way Chinese will sell their ship to their enemies Your advice is very oxymoron ideas ever

[@christophmahler]

@@WhyyouSodesperate "Your advice is very oxymoron ideas ever" You have learned to translate a statement from the English language into Your own, but You don't read enough in order to pick up stances like sarcasm... The Chinese bought into US research of biological weapons in Wuhan, why shouldn't - after a military coup - US admirals buy from the most cost effective yards to maintain the Monroe Doctrine...

[@SenorBastardo1348]

I wonder if the emphasis on stealth in the satellite age doesn't potentially indicate that the Chinese are confident they can eliminate satellite coverage?

[@tuputapu877]

Satellite age is ancient now since the fifties. So you're saying the U.S stealth destroyers were useless considering not only China but Russia and many other countries have had satellites in space for decades?

[@SenorBastardo1348]

@@tuputapu877 No, Im not saying that. Satellite's have full coverage night and day. Im implying that the Chinese may be confident they can counter that surveillance by shooting the satellite's down. This applies to the US too btw, but the Russians are the furthest ahead in anti-satellite missiles (which they have 100% shared with the Chinese).

[@thehumus8688]

Satelite dont have 24 hour coverage Most reconaisance Satelite was orbiting the earth every 12 or 24 hours. with like at most half an hour of observation time window - Thats the "Delay" of information gathering via satelite they not look down all the time in real time, like Command and conquer

[@johnmarick6974]

@@tuputapu877 yes, they are and were useless, one of the reasons the US stopped building them

[@SenorBastardo1348]

@@thehumus8688 Dude....obviously 1 satellite...thats why you have a network. Why do you think starlink can provide continuous internet connectivity. They have thousands of them....and yes they can look at 1 spot 24/7 365 now.

[@kangbule]

My news: This is just a mini experimental ship

[@hcjet]

模拟针对隐身目标的识别与攻击战术实验平台而已

[@LuobingSong]

a design very similar to Sweden corvette, which has been prove to be stealthy, for me i prefer a proved design in the stage of ship building instead of some fancy thing like DDG1000, came up with more trouble after enlisted. however it is actually a experimental ship, the size of the bridge is too small for sealing, from my calculation, a 2200 ton corvette requires more than 8 operater in the bridge, i am not a professional sailor and thats a estimation i actually prefer put vertical launcher in the middle of hull and put bridge much forward, which is more favorable for operating ships in narrow water, and there will be one less stage on the ship and more stealthy this actually indicate one thing, China tend to add vls launcher in to corvette there is a critical question for peoples navy in the next 20 years, with extended range of our navy, most large combat ship maybe deployed on the ocean, however Japanese navy and US navy are still close to Chinese coastline, even after the final part of Chinese liberation war, the Taiwan. still need some kind of service ship and a coastline fleet to protect Chinese coastline and keep balance of east Asia, i think this kind of thing along with missile boat fleet and air force can cover this thing US navy may retreat from east Asia in 2050s, before new balance was established between Pacific ocean, China responsible for keep peace of east Asia before they go, after that China and east Asia will totally get rid of risk of war, and thats the time when these ship ready to retired maybe there will be a new missile boat replace old type 22, lets see

[@hyhhy]

I wonder how good the stealth is.

[@АндрейМ-ф5н]

ВМФ НОАК 🇨🇳💪🇨🇳💪🇨🇳💪🇨🇳💪🇨🇳💪

[@油管删评控评垃圾平台]

你是俄罗斯的华侨还是华裔，我不理解把自己账号头像设置成别的国家国旗的人是什么成分，包括有些非美国人头像是美国国旗🤔

[@blisteringstars]

looks like a big visby-class

[@vahapcakmak2313]

Very good

[@6haha]

It is just a test unit

[@mcknight3483]

Seems to be a combination of the type 45 of the british for the mast design. The main gun from the zumwalt and the hull design from the modern lcs of the US. Reverse engeneering is not as perfect as the original, though.

[@UndoEverything]

This ship has resemblance to Zumwalt destroyer. China is a hope for poor countries. Don't take me wrong. Wheel is already invented, so no need to invent again. Just make it more long lasting. That's it.

[@Galileo1491]

A masterpiece of the proletariat

[@FghggjkjFhhcghj]

เยี่ยม

[@ncs2000]

looks like Visby class

[@leapdrive]

Another external copy of American high tech ships, the Zumwalt Class. Does an external copy mean internal designs are at the same level? We don’t think so!

[@MrSchwabentier]

looks nothing like the Zumwalt. You should check out the swedish Visby Class Corvettes. Then you know where they copied from

[@leapdrive]

@@MrSchwabentier , a copy is a copy is a copy.

[@MrSchwabentier]

@@leapdrive still not a zumwalt copy

[@gavinhu9904]

You may have to see a doctor about your eyes or your brain

[@leapdrive]

@@gavinhu9904 , misidentifying what copy it is does not prove eye or brain issue. It’s just misidentification. Your diatribe is simply an attempt to cover you real issue - of making inferior copies.

[@honfmeilingfleet957]

now i am waiting this Ship added to Modern Warships game

[@ethanha4869]

这个口音听着很亲切^^

[@wlyiu4057]

We are only half way through 2024.

[@drandersjiang]

022 Corvette replacement?

[@bearpolo3618]

No, there is another smaller one, only 280 tons displacement, yet carries more arsenal with integrated AESA radar system.

[@VashtheStampede007]

022 is not a corvette. It is a missile boat lol. And 022 is not useful on its own due to limitations in sensory due to tiny size, and lack of area air defense. I would think it might be a good idea to have multiple 022 detached from a cruiser or amphibious assault ship, while operating under the air defense umbrella of the fleet, it can increase targets for the enemies and might sneak a few anti ship missiles in the direction of enemy surface combatants

[@hughmungus2760]

The CSSC A2000 seems to be a better candidate for that

[@hughmungus2760]

@@VashtheStampede007 Missile boats these days are probably going to be deathtraps in a war because of dual use AAM/AshM like the SM6. They're going to have to be unmanned or be seriously stealthy to survive.

[@drandersjiang]

@@VashtheStampede007 Oops, yes you are right. I meant 056.

[@Absolut531kmh]

The stealth turret looks like it would potentially be a Electromagnetic Ammunition turret, which the PLA is running tests with it as we speak.

[@Cannoli_JJ]

中国军方已经实验了新型电磁炮能击穿100公里外8cm的装甲，不过目前体型不适合小型舰船。🧐

[@reynaldomercado2920]

Might be old content in a new skin

[@noelacosta2245]

chinese made design are more on physical appearance but nothing on performance

[@俊毅蓝]

对对对，你说什么都对。以前中国船只老久，那肯定是落后的，现在中国舰队先进，那肯定也是落后的！！哈哈哈！我们现在陆军进入无人时代了，那也是落后的！！！反正你们永远都是先进的！我们做什么都是落后的！！！看看巴西绝军事演习，中国特种部队是怎么碾压美国特种部队的吧！！我们零伤亡，仅仅牺牲了4条机器狗，让美国特种部队全军覆没！！！！你别告诉我这种事情是美国故意全军覆没的！超级军事强国的美国面子不重要吗？

[@jeseolouizerondael3906]

A copycat of Visby Corvette 😂😂 as usual

[@georgepoitras3502]

Looks just like they bought the plans for the US Littoral combat ship and copied it. They know those were removed from service because they suck right?🤣🤣😂😂

[@rubiconklbrutorowman7577]

It is baby size US Zumwalt!

[@Trayagain97]

Visby class? 😂

[@burprobrox9134]

It’s really silly for any US adversary to build stealth, any large ship will be tracked real-time via satellite. The tracking data can be disseminated to allies on order in any escalation. It might be useful against local enemies such as Vietnam, but even they are now sharing data with the US. I can’t think of any reason to build an actual deployable version of this. It will definitely help them to build better radars and learn how to see better, but useless in combat

[@laowantongchau]

So why did the US build the Zumwalt?

[@hughmungus2760]

stealth makes sense in littoral waters because of the ground clutter and civilian traffic. If the ship looks like a fishing boat on radar most navies are going to have to double check to make sure they aren't shooting an actual fishing boat.

[@kameraldbahrul3432]

​@@laowantongchau for wasting tax

[@AchwaqKhalid]

What a load of BS!!! You lost all credibility when you said _"Naval News"_ wasn't a credible source of information 😅

[@JeanGoalin]

It's a FREM copy.

[@georgeeagle872]

Lol. You're talking sh8t

[@kinwai27271]

Outside look alike doesn't mean inside is the same

[@BecarefulIliveinyourwalls]

They just copied LCS (Little Crappy Ship)

[@fuchsnight]

一听这口语，就知道是大陆北方人😂

[@EurasiaNaval]

Lol, no. You are mistaken actually :)

[@greenisnice9345]

I'm an amateur about these. I heard that China's submarine technology is still ten years behind the U.S.A.'s. Is this true? Just curious.

[@XkMeng]

China's nuclear submarines may be lagging behind by more than 10 years, but this is related to China's strategy. They do not need to go to the other side of the earth. China's conventional submarines are very advanced.

[@fatdoi003]

subs are most mysterious type.... no one knows much about them..... super classified bunch of boats...

[@chingtuckmeng1122]

100000 behind usa no #1

[@frank-y8n]

Several years ago China built a very large plant to produce nuclear submarines. That should indicate that it considered its technology to be advanced enough to be at least near the level of US. Perhaps based on assistance from Russia.

[@jxmai7687]

中国有可能在寻求弯道超车的方法，不会跟着美国的尾巴发展的，总有超越的时候，拭目以待吧。

[@佯谬]

中国的雷达非常优异，我希望把这个舰艇做成无人艇 自动巡航在太平洋做电子侦查并且有防空拦截 反舰打击😂

[@davegruujohn2168]

Looks like copy swedish visby class

[@faerak]

Copy of Zumwalt

[@tonbopro]

technology demonstrator

[@capespring]

Visby-class corvette

[@30cm27]

Copied from Japanese warships。。。もがみ型護衛艦，30FFM

[@clintcasera8758]

Copy deaign from other country

[@billngo7197]

Like who's China copies from itsel🙄

[@jon_nomad]

Look absolutely like the Swedish "Visby" Class corvette.

[@but_at_what_cost]

维斯比很好，但是太小了，才700吨，武器只有炮。

[@mikevoltamp6146]

Tufu-Dreg for sure, experimental or not.

[@kinwai27271]

You mad?😂

[@fzmoifzmoi2575]

Regurgitating Fallen Gong Cult propaganda makes you irreversibly imbecilic..

[@laowantongchau]

Hope you feel better soon 😂

[@chengzhang9175]

you need a psychiatrist

[@Cannoli_JJ]

你展现了物种的多样性。🧐

[@commodorce6431]

Elongated Visby class

[@aaabbb-ff1sp]

Change the narrator...you will get more subscribers 🙄

[@danielmartin7838]

I like the narrator. He’s a large part of what keeps me personally returning

[@Sundeep_x]

Tofu army

[@Tyteagas]

Sweden design copycat chinese😂

[@vanshanand3946]

Finnally stealth ship

[@captain54526]

BS !

[@Zerpentsa6598]

Was it built to sell tofu around the SCS? 🤣🤣🤣

[@zulkanainbaharuddin2185]

More to take curry masalla.😂😂😂

[@julianchung9215]

Thats all you can say? Weak insult from a person with a small brain...

[@xinyiquan666]

slum curry masalla

[@kesai119]

I think motorcycles in India are great, they can accommodate more than 10 people. This is something that our country cannot do.

[@julianchung9215]

Nope zerpensta, it was built for you to ride with your gay lover....🍄🍄😁

[@DreamsofAmber]

Hah...junk- let me see it turn at highspeed without hull integrity failure

[@karlk7070]

Zumwalmart

[@verypleasantguy]

It's a decoy ！

[@williamblomster2387]

too small to be a good tourist cruise ship,,need to put in more cabins

[@paulantony4598]

Visby's big Chinese sis...

[@Hellfox777]

LMAO "New Technology"