Subject: 'Is There a Liberal Crack Up' Dated: 1984
Пікірлер: 3 400
@dinospumoni6637 жыл бұрын
I didn't know Norm MacDonald was on Firing Line.
@gerhardbreda24797 жыл бұрын
Brilliant, mate. Brilliant.
@AliIKarimi7 жыл бұрын
i was gonna say this
@daneryan18797 жыл бұрын
You know who else was on Firing Line? That's right, you guessed it, Frank Stallone
@88cgdan7 жыл бұрын
he sounds like his voice is sped up
@ricomajestic7 жыл бұрын
Haha!
@inaccessiblecardinal93529 жыл бұрын
You get a real feeling that Buckley ends up realizing, "shit, I should have just had Hitch on the show" somewhere in this discussion.
@idklol41979 жыл бұрын
If you were attentive enough to listen to the whole thing and catch a few brief moments of argument and interpret them that way then yes. If not then its probably your biases speaking for you
@jeremyfoster42328 жыл бұрын
+Joe Cash The conversation was mostly between Buckley and Hitchens. Tyrrell was only there to repeat what he said in his book
@jangyman8 жыл бұрын
+Jeremy Foster ...yes, that seems pretty accurate. Buckley and Hitchens seems to have been the most engaged in the central discourse on liberalism - even if they find themselves at opposite viewpoints, and were at times irritated ...at best distracted by Tyrrell's often failed interjections. Emmett's womanly, wistley drawl reminds me of a young Margot Kidder ...or Jodie Foster. It think both William and Emmett were slightly attracted to Christopher's rugged, unapologetic whit and criticism.
@inaccessiblecardinal93528 жыл бұрын
Yeah, Hitch and Buck would have been a much more interesting conversation. *****
@shinebedi53888 жыл бұрын
+Inaccessible Cardinal True.42:45-42:51
@dartfrogger Жыл бұрын
Mr Buckley looks like he is fighting somewhere around 6 g's of gravity in this particular moment
@davidlamb7524Ай бұрын
😂
@gor2658 ай бұрын
Hitchens was an incredible tour de force, his superior intellect, devastating knowledge and inescapable insight totally outclassed his opponents in that exchange.
@philipgior33126 жыл бұрын
Hitchens while criticizing sections of Tyrell's book: "I'm glad I didn't write it myself", and "I seem to have read your book more carefully than you have". Priceless....
@msjdb723 Жыл бұрын
😁
@rajivkwatra Жыл бұрын
Another amazing example of Christopher Hitchen’s intellect and wit. How wonderful it would have been to have his thoughts and insights over the last 12 years. He’s still the best debater I have seen.
@paulodonovanmusic10 ай бұрын
do you tempt digital fate?
@user-oz5hp2km3z5 жыл бұрын
“Terminological inexactitude is not what you meant to say, is it?” “It’s a euphemism for what you want to say.” “Are you aware of the provenance of the term?” Winston Churchill used the phrase in parliament in order to comply with an order from the speaker to withdraw an unparliamentary accusation- in that case calling someone a liar. Hitch knew so much about history.
@cdr861532 Жыл бұрын
And you as well, apparently. Nice eye.
@mellow5123 Жыл бұрын
Such a shame we don't have shows like this anymore.
@joseywales148 Жыл бұрын
We don’t have an educated, informed and knowledgeable society…Americans are really low IQ people
@criert135 Жыл бұрын
We do but not enough. People just prefer to scream and virtue signal on social media
@edwardhassan4692 Жыл бұрын
@@criert135 So true and so damn sad. I love this discourse, if we had it today it would be so interesting.
@carlodave9 Жыл бұрын
If only Buckley knew his so-called conservative movement was hot on the road to Limbaugh, Fox, the Tea Party, Q-Anon, religious rule, and Trump. Completely selling out conservatism to radical corporatism-and REALLY hating people who can still manage to think.
@BradPoulosCanada Жыл бұрын
@@edwardhassan4692 Many Podcasts are long form discussions similar to this.
@netjunkie97 жыл бұрын
Tyrell loses right from the start by refusing to speak with a British or Mid-Atlantic accent, thereby nullifying his argument.
@sk00lb0y7 жыл бұрын
netjunkie9 lol
@LexingtonWells7 жыл бұрын
Very true. You just can't compete with that type of oration.
@Chris-jo1zr6 жыл бұрын
I thought there was a woman in the debate before checking the video. The voice betrays him.
@spencerallbritton94596 жыл бұрын
Hahaha so true. I wish I had Buckley’s accent, one of an intellectual in a constant state of careless apathy, always confident in his arguments and finding his opponents annoying in their lack of articulation, both in thought as well as in speech.
@madsupervilian.6 жыл бұрын
haha, that was funny netjunkie9
@AlecDavid0076 жыл бұрын
It's hilarious how Buckley treats Tyrell with such disdain after a while.
@JamesMoore-un3cu Жыл бұрын
Isn't it always the conservative in the room, whose commentary gets interrupted, downplayed and otherwise disrespected in every debate situation? The only exceptions are Ben Shapiro and Jordan Peterson, whose wisdom and intellect are beyond reproach by most Liberals. Thank GOD there is still some common sense in the world to lean on, because the world would be in flames (already) had it been left to Liberals to usher in their Socialist and Communist agendas.
@leedsmanc Жыл бұрын
He's embarrassed when Tyrell starts to want to associate himself with Buckley as "being on the same side", he visibily starts squirming and distancing himself from him, because Hitchens is winning the argument.
@danhemsley5 жыл бұрын
Part of what makes this discussion so rewarding is the dance of respect and understanding that Hitchens and Buckley undertake. As for the insufferable troll on the end, well, three’s a crowd.
@judypryor43512 жыл бұрын
Christopher is brilliant. As always.
@wessexmom Жыл бұрын
Perfect description.
@d2d2d28 Жыл бұрын
Buckley is insufferable as well but for different reason.
@fnono33 Жыл бұрын
Interesting part is that everything the guy on the far right is saying has come true.
@ericmccall3415 Жыл бұрын
@@fnono33 is it just coincidence that he’s seated there? On the far-right?!
@Muzikman127 Жыл бұрын
"I'll let the viewers be the judge of whether I sound as if I believe any of that. I haven't got time." brutal lol. One thing you can always say about Hitchens, he really had a way with a sharp turn of phrase
@BluesInSeattle Жыл бұрын
Hitchens was always smarter than any of us.
@gretchenrobinson825 Жыл бұрын
Hitchens could quietly, calmly, cut his opponent off at the knees. Devastating!!! They never knew what hit them! Buckley was dishonest and reminds me of an asp by the way he licks his lips. Never half as smart as he thought the was.
@222ableVelo Жыл бұрын
@@BluesInSeattle Hitchens was an idiot.
@julianbrown10928 жыл бұрын
17:53 "I'm quite happy to grant you that a woman would have to happy go lucky to associate with you." Pure gold
@cdr861532 Жыл бұрын
ZING!
@user-io9sl1pz3m6 жыл бұрын
Buckley's voice is the Ambien of its time.
@rachelhutchinson4399 Жыл бұрын
Perfectly put.
@SuperRobertoClemente Жыл бұрын
Such a slimeball.
@Tenzin62 Жыл бұрын
The opening of this is AWESOME. Audience members instructed to stare sideways at the camera
@davidrowe94022 жыл бұрын
This is an excellent clear thinking piece. Count the number of personal attacks Tyrell makes on Hitchens, in proportion to really knowing how out of his depth he was.
@rumination2399 Жыл бұрын
He’s hilariously foppish. He addressed the camera more than anyone. Lots of fake smiles pretending he’s not fuming with resentment.
@misterhope52419 ай бұрын
@@rumination2399 And of course you have a special ability to know that he’s fuming with resentment. Perhaps you’re describing yourself rather than him. It follows that you would have a greater comprehension of that. But from your comment it might just follow that self knowledge is not your strong suit.
@rumination23999 ай бұрын
@@misterhope5241 bro c'mon. Body language is truer than words. People can't hide what they are. Are you trying to seem even more like what I said than he was? You didn't make a single point of substance - it was all just insult and emotion pretending to be insight. Who you trying to bluff man, I'm pretty much the only one likely to attend to your animus
@nfal44510 жыл бұрын
Everyone staring directly at the camera at the beginning was slightly unsettling .
@hYpYz10 жыл бұрын
true. and when host smiles he looks like joker. something is very wrong with his face
@nfal44510 жыл бұрын
Yeah on top of all that, the host constantly looks like he is hanging over the back of his seat, the opposition to Hitchens sounds like a high pitch female. But very interesting to hear the debates from the time of the past.
@Demention9410 жыл бұрын
nfal445 He probably had to pee.
@influenza9910 жыл бұрын
I caught that too, and thought it was the strangest thing.
@nfal44510 жыл бұрын
Lord Spacey Christopher if only you knew the power of the dark.... I mean republican side.
@alanthe210 жыл бұрын
3:00 It's amazing how Buckley can sit in a chair like that without falling out of it. He's nearly horizontal. They should have provided him with a chaise lounge...
@mjja996 жыл бұрын
That made me laugh - thank you
@Omnicient.5 жыл бұрын
And made me laugh too!
@ezequielmartinezvazquez59695 жыл бұрын
A true LOL moment :)
@carywarren78005 жыл бұрын
With the laid back chair posture, Buckley is projecting nonchalant intellectual superiority, “listen and learn”.
@Omnicient.5 жыл бұрын
No one is saying he isn't.
@dwtbrown2 жыл бұрын
I couldn't resist looking back at Tyrell's book, and it seems that he takes delight in using Fratboy wisecracks as a substitute for analysis and even, god help us, research. I am glad that we have heard so little from him over the years, particularly when juxtaposing his impact with that of Hitchens.
@WeatherStationZ41 Жыл бұрын
How little the right has changed
@Etatdesiege19799 ай бұрын
Tyrell looks every bit as a condescending dick in here.
@mini_worx2 жыл бұрын
"I know there was a joke somewhere, but I must have missed it." Hitchens was the absolute best.
@FlowerGirl8 Жыл бұрын
He’s so young! This is the earliest video I have seen of him - just as brilliant back then. Tremendous loss to die so young.
@fastinbulvis2223 Жыл бұрын
@7:32 "There was an attempt to utilize agencies of the state as a private politcal police force." Like what The Garland Archipelago is doing now.
@robinmads6710 Жыл бұрын
@@fastinbulvis2223 cfc CFG ghhghhhghhhhhhghhhhhhhhhhh hahahaha ffxzph Go p G Paul p go hhPcygPpppfFgdhd
@robinmads6710 Жыл бұрын
@@fastinbulvis2223 G G dg G G G f yPhyp
@bunkerdome3562 Жыл бұрын
Of the 2 he turned out to be the one wrong about everything though. Smugness is an act
@kaibe524110 жыл бұрын
The amount of ad hominem from the guy in blue is amazing. He doesn't debate hitchens on a single point.
@MrAnthonyVance10 жыл бұрын
Kirk, you said it well ... I noticed it big time ... the blue suited arrogant prick was personally insulting to Christopher.
@cityzenjane210 жыл бұрын
Tony Learner as a complete lightweight he has trouble rallying much else..if you look...both Hitch and Buckley smirk when he talks because what he says is so often stupid.
@kaibe524110 жыл бұрын
cityzenjane2 I didn't notice that. haha
@benmcleish73028 жыл бұрын
What's impressive here is that Buckley lets his guests speak and remains silent for many minutes at a time. No television show would feature this kind of edit or production anymore.
@Danskadreng5 жыл бұрын
First time I've seen a show or debate with Buckley, where he doesn't interrupt all the time.
@jackgray32675 жыл бұрын
He never let Noam Chomsky speak because Buckley was a PUSSSSSSSSSSYYYYYYYYYY!!!
@grottphd90905 жыл бұрын
@@jackgray3267 In critics of Buckley, the one reference that's always recruited in proving the point is his hour long debate with Chompsky. He remains as one of the most prolific intellectuals to ever live. It will require more than a miniscule example to take him down.
@jackgray32675 жыл бұрын
@@grottphd9090 I noticed that Buckley never invited Chomsky back on his show after getting trounched like he did lol
@grottphd90905 жыл бұрын
That's a better indictment than before. Not enough to paint his career black, but a better try.
@darrellrobinson93545 жыл бұрын
Tyrrell is introduced as the funniest political essayist to come along in years, but Hitchens gets all the laughs.
@deanronson6331 Жыл бұрын
Maybe funny for offering us inadvertent humor with his climbing into Buckley's nether orifice.
@kamuelalee Жыл бұрын
@@deanronson6331 He climbed well.
@JamesMoore-un3cu Жыл бұрын
He's just more pompous, that's all. An extreme Liberal, or so it seems. Hitchens was the only one calling for "laughs" out of the three, do you notice that? That's because Liberals generally try to put someone down when the others don't agree with their ideology, even though it's full of gaping holes.
@leedsmanc Жыл бұрын
@@JamesMoore-un3cu did you not detect any attempts to "put HItchens down" from Tyrell?
@Bucketheadhead Жыл бұрын
@@JamesMoore-un3cu Hitchens was not a “liberal”, but professed himself here to be a socialist. These are not the same thing.
@kakdelarebyata5 жыл бұрын
"Terminological inexactitude is not what you meant to say, is it?" How is this line never included in Hitchens' best cuts ever? This is genius-level trash talk. His poise is incomparable. Final observation: Conservatives defending Nixon. The GOP has never really changed.
@browsertab9 жыл бұрын
Do we even have columnists who can shoot off history like this today? I can't imagine many of New York Times's darlings being this sharp in a debate.
@richdick96289 жыл бұрын
You're right. Regardless of any of these 3 guys political slant they are a rare breed today. Hitchens and Buckley are certainly missing these days.
@cshaw13479 жыл бұрын
Sad that Americans (the only nation I can speak for) would rather watch the Daily Show or those sexy FOX news anchors than listen to well educated, unique, and opinionated intellectuals challenge each other's beliefs with well thought out arguments. Occasionally C-SPAN will have something worth watching when it comes to current events, but not often.
@kenvee94469 жыл бұрын
Amen. Buckley and Hitchens represent both sides of the political fence with impressive calm and intellectual ammo. Tyrrell, hawking the book, is no idiot, but IS a bit of a lightweight in this kind of company in terms of his poise. He'd be at home on many of today's less impressive, more opinion driven news shows.
@matejoh5 жыл бұрын
Exactly. These older clips are leaving me thirsty for true intellectual debates.
@CMRinehart5 жыл бұрын
Probably most columnist today are red, but probably not well read.
@gregcampwriter8 жыл бұрын
Astonishing how relevant this discussion is today. Hitchens is brilliant.
@keithfitzgerald876 Жыл бұрын
But it's not "astonishing" how ideological most of these comments are. Leftists gush over Hitchens, while right-wingers are gaga about the other two windbags.
@heidiho3270 Жыл бұрын
I love and miss him and am revisting all his wonderful intelligence.
@Jide-bq9yf Жыл бұрын
Terrell genuinely believes he is more intelligent than Hitchens . You couldn’t make it up .
@ericfshook5 жыл бұрын
William F Buckley Jr is a STYLE ICON. He is the embodiment of ARTFUL DISHEVELMENT.
@wessexmom Жыл бұрын
Only when "ARTFUL DISHEVELMENT" is a euphemistic term for hideous. Fascinating to hear these guys talk about when to tell a woman she's ugly when it's Buckley who's UUUGLYY!
@jojokerus8 жыл бұрын
There is a gem of a moment at about 26:00 - Tyrell: "Pretty good, eh Christopher?" Hitchens: "Yeah, I am so glad I didn't write it myself."
@ManPursueExcellence5 жыл бұрын
jojokerus Lol
@mdl2224 жыл бұрын
TTTTTTSSSSSSSSSSSAVAGE!!!
@giladgh3 жыл бұрын
@@mdl222 and right after at 26:24 "for your position to be... even humorous,"
@toast26102 жыл бұрын
Gives new meaning to living life "in the moment".. what else is there after all for the nihilistic.
@turbochargedsports63272 жыл бұрын
An early, vintage Hitchslap!
@JackGriffin29 жыл бұрын
Buckley: "I am often accused of an inordinate reliance on unusual words, and desire to defend myself against the insinuation that I write as I do simply to prove that I have returned recently from the bowels of a dictionary with a fish in my mouth."
@gorecassady16329 жыл бұрын
spot on!
@blasalvice2 жыл бұрын
Even young, the man had more class, humility and intellectual honesty than ANY other speaker he faces.
@toast26102 жыл бұрын
He is an unashamed imperial supremacist with a soothing voice. What are you people smoking?
@MIKE-TYTHON2 жыл бұрын
@@toast2610 70 substances known to cause cancer baby
@toast26102 жыл бұрын
@@MIKE-TYTHON of the brain
@Vingul2 жыл бұрын
He was much better young than old.
@deadinthebed9632 жыл бұрын
No he was even wiser when he was older
@rcchristian2 Жыл бұрын
The coup of 1953, Mossedegh was set to nationalize the oil industry in Iran, and the UK wasn't having it. This wasn't about democracy, it was about oil. Because he took those steps, and was set to give that wealth back to the Iranian people, take the control from the US and UK oil companies (British Petroleum) the CIA helped overthrow Mossedegh. When the Shah got in to power after the coup, he create SAVAK, the deadly Iranian spy agency and they went and murdered and assassinated as many of the Shahs opponents over the next 20 years of abuse. Eventually the Iranian students rose up in the Iranian hostage crisis and took over the US embassy for 444 days until the Shah was deposed. This took Iran from a democratically elected prime minister, to a dictator and then eventually when the Shah was deposed, Iran went the way of religious fanaticism, to the way it is today with the Ayatollah. We turned a democratically elected Iran in to the religious government it is today. The way some people put this coup in the light of a fight for democracy, when it was all about oil... is just not consistent with history.
@flyingphobiahelp Жыл бұрын
So well said
@abum4595 Жыл бұрын
I don't think the religious leader would have tolerated Mossadegh for very long
@christco120 Жыл бұрын
@@abum4595 Iran was not the same place it is today in 1953, it was not a theocracy and the clerics did not have the influence and control they have now. Mossadegh had massive support with the people. The shah was nearly deposed after he tried to fire him. If the western powers had not intervened, the middle east would likely look very different today
@Etatdesiege19799 ай бұрын
Mabrook. Well said.
@Etatdesiege19799 ай бұрын
@@christco120 One can only imagine.
@Mutex5010 жыл бұрын
Norm Macdonald used to have a really high voice.
@Shroommduke10 жыл бұрын
OMG I was thinking the same thing! LOL
@crissy262810 жыл бұрын
It was very accurate on the part of the uploader to leave that third character's name out of the title. And as an aside, no has ever, nor will anyone ever again be able to fuck someone up so thoroughly with words as Christopher could and often did.
@GerLeahy10 жыл бұрын
I couldn't have put it better if I tried.
@HCMCDrives11 ай бұрын
I never knew that Norm Macdonald had a prior life as a writer.
@benthejrporter2 жыл бұрын
No talk show today is half as good as this.
@susanmiller7464 Жыл бұрын
I agree!!
@UKAlanR11 ай бұрын
Apart from the host being so supercilious in his every remark!
@Etatdesiege19799 ай бұрын
It’s almost impossible to have a political talk show like this today. There’s too much money to make in advertising to give educated people a time to talk. This is why podcasts are so popular. It requires an intellectual effort for the audience and patience to actually listen.
@lavachebeadsman9 жыл бұрын
Buckley and Hitchens are both brilliant debaters. I've no clue what the other guy is doing in the room with them.
@cameron78869 жыл бұрын
MetrazolElectricity I disagree with a lot of modern feminist rhetoric, but him Tyrell saying the Women's Christian Temperance League's power showed that women were powerful is a horrible argument. They couldn't even vote in national elections at the time. How was he wrong about feminism? They were undoubtably a repressed group in US society for centuries. They may not be now, but that's the point. It's because of the past feminist waves that so many seem so ridiculous now.
@KB4QAA9 жыл бұрын
Lavache Beadsman Terrell was a darling of the Republican Right in the early 80's thru 90's. He was primarily a columnist, for Buckley's magazine, I believe.
@neanderslob9 жыл бұрын
Lavache Beadsman I feel like with Buckley and Hitch, we're seeing the dignity of debate between an old-school conservative and an old-school liberal. And every time Tyrell pipes up, it's like seeing a foreshadowing of the noisy neo-conservative tone to come.
@dickvarga69089 жыл бұрын
Lavache Beadsman well he wrote the book expressing the opinions which they are arguing.
@neanderslob9 жыл бұрын
Dick Varga Ahh, missed that point. Thanks!
@prideventues8 жыл бұрын
Tyrrell is hillarious. Every time I think some of the modern conservatives are a little on the deep end, I listen to Tyrrell and realize it has been happening for a long time. I consider William F/ Buckley Jr a hero of mine and started watching him in high school. I did not agree with Mr. Buckley on many things. Tyrrell is not fit for debates on Firing Line because he is like a lot of current conservatives accusing, arrogant, disrupting and accusatory. He takes out of context just about everything that Christopher says or things. Mr. Buckley at least has a honest debate on ideas, and that is why I love him. Interesting that Tyrrell calls everyone who does not think like him a phanatic. Hitchens is cool and competent as is Buckley and are highly enjoyable. Tyrrell is the precursor to FOX news.
@rainmaker6908 жыл бұрын
+Maurice Jones Seriously, this guy Tyrrell's views on feminism at the time sound like the typical reactionary bullshit against it by white men who couldn't handle the fact that's women's roles in society were changing because women fought like hell to make it change. Typical narrow-minded view of feminism by a white privileged dude who didn't know what the hell he was talking about. Hitchens obviously had a better grasp on it---I actually liked Hitchens back in the day before he become a supporter of right-wing views and became an arrogant dick. Interesting to see him while he was still a liberal,though.
@anouman98838 жыл бұрын
+rainmaker690 Great comment. I'd just say one thing, though: Hitchens wasn't a liberal; he was a socialist. But yeah, it's a shame how he drifted towards the right later in life.
@MKrip8088 жыл бұрын
+Maurice Jones Excellent comment and I feel the exact same way that you do about it. I found the exchange between Buckley and Hitchens fascinating and Tyrell's input to be incredibly annoying.
@prideventues8 жыл бұрын
+MKrip808 I so wish we had debaters on the conservative side instead of the attacking, angry, judgmental attitudes like with Tyrrell.
@briandonahue71988 жыл бұрын
+Maurice Jones " accusing, arrogant, disrupting and accusatory"........that is exactly the way liberals are characterized...
@jamesstuart93454 жыл бұрын
Viewers note: there is but one analysis that is pertinent here. Mr Hitchens was invited back to Firing Line, frequently. Mr Tyrell vanished into obscurity. Conclusion: Mr Buckley appreciated Hitchens style and respected him for it. High praise indeed.
@edwardhassan4692 Жыл бұрын
23:48 You live in a world of kooks! Hitchens: it is very sweet of you to say so
@mic7able9 жыл бұрын
Hitchens never fails to astound me with his unwavering cool and absolute brilliance. Irreplaceable, in my view.
@rickw79035 жыл бұрын
No need to replace him. He came and went. In the overall scope of things he is insignificant. To some, at most, he was just a fly temporarily in their ointment. For most everyone else he was simply entertainment.
@houstonmuhammad8435 жыл бұрын
I agree wholeheartedly. He is something to behold.
@michaels14164 жыл бұрын
Hitler, Stalin, Mao and Pol Pot also astounded the world with their "unwavering cool and absolute brilliance", and irreplaceable.......
@MattSingh12 жыл бұрын
@@michaels1416 *Hitler was entirely backed by the Catholic Church. The fascist movement of the 20th century was the Catholic right-wing. Stalin was a new God, as Bertrand Russell demonstrated. Your total ignorance is typical of that of someone that attempts to slander, slur and defame the atheist movement. You're a clueless buffoon.*
@johnofroncesvalles42552 жыл бұрын
@@MattSingh1 Chamberlain wrote a peace treaty. The Catholic Church wrote a 1937 Encyclcal, Mit brennender Sorge, read in all Chruches in German, condemning the mad man.
@batgirl34365 жыл бұрын
It is hilarious that anyone would dare to accuse Hitchens of not understanding a situation (25.34) when he was one of the most erudite, informed human beings we have had the privilege to hear. Seeing him in action is a tonic. He is sorely missed.
@turbochargedsports63272 жыл бұрын
Amen. I miss his sharp wit & even sharper intellect. Amazing to watch how cool under fire he was in the face of a pointless blowhard who did little but hurl insults & barely addressed facts on merit.
@bradders9743 Жыл бұрын
Imagine thinking anyone is incapable of misunderstanding something. Hitchens fans are insufferable.
@corystratton5318 Жыл бұрын
No one misses that drunken, Iraq war supporting idiot.
@scrumpymanjack Жыл бұрын
"If you don't think that's more serious, that's your problem and not mine." Classic Hitch.
@Franciscasieri2 жыл бұрын
44:26 Hitches come back with chattle slavery was beautiful I'm sure I'm not the only person who misses a man he never met in person
@pwreric8 жыл бұрын
How embarrassing for Tyrell. When your a right winger and Buckley is constantly correcting and disagreeing with you, you are showing a lack of acumen, understanding and in his case, obnoxiousness. Its funny how he tries to warm up to "William" Buckley by calling him "Bill" and reminding (apparently mistakenly ) "Poor" Christopher that he is outnumbered.
@coreycox23453 жыл бұрын
Poor Tyrell, pwreric. He was arrogant and disillusioned.
@Kleinfurkon7 жыл бұрын
I love how Hitchens slowly but surely makes the better argument and thus impresses the shit out of Buckley to the point where Buckley all but dismisses Tyrell (as a the idealogue).
@cdr861532 Жыл бұрын
I noticed that too.......
@JamesMoore-un3cu Жыл бұрын
That's called a systematic oppression of dissenting views by Liberals, to dominate and control the narrative. There is an assumption here that Tyrell was "not as intelligent" as the other two, but that's not necessarily true. He just wasn't as pompous, therefore, got less respect in the audience's eyes. Because that's what the Left does when confronted with facts. Evade and avoid and put the onus on the other person to be more "witty" and therefore, convincing. I watched several instances in this video where Hitchens resorted to character assassinations when confronted with facts (different opinions, actually) from Tyrell. Ideologies, on their face, are just that, ideas. Does not make them right, even though the speaker wants to convince you that because they can spew more book verses, that what they're saying is more valid. Horsehockey. You were just reading the wrong books on Liberalism vs. common sense. No magic there.
@christopherhamilton3621 Жыл бұрын
Indeed. Terrell is/was a superficial & supercilious RW mouthpiece & not a serious thinker whatsoever. A joke, IOW…
@steve-real Жыл бұрын
Christopher Hitchens is incredibly quick and very very funny. I miss this guy.
@cuzned1375 Жыл бұрын
23:53 Tyrell: You live in a world full of kooks! Hitchens: You’re very sweet to say so. 😆
@wilsonmcphert Жыл бұрын
My favourite bit.
@ttheway2life1578 жыл бұрын
Tyrrell was like the little brother invited to the adults table. See i'm grown see? no, shut up and learn something. it's easy to see Hitch and Buckley going off to dinner for further discussion without the kid around.
@MKrip8088 жыл бұрын
+Ttheway2 life and he's sitting there acting so smug like he's the cock of the walk on that set.
@JaeWoodFLAWDSKWAD8 жыл бұрын
+MKrip808 And has a ridiculously prepubescent voice lol
@melvinmiller48438 жыл бұрын
+Ttheway2 life I totally agree,but also mr.buckley is barely holding his own against mr.hitchens,so he keeps cutting him off!!!!!!
@FreethinkingSecularist10 жыл бұрын
"That's like saying if your aunt had cojones she would be your uncle", Hitchens is my hero. I am just glad that after all his books there is still all this type footage for me to enjoy!
@geoffcrumblin98502 жыл бұрын
The man cast a long shadow
@Billsbob Жыл бұрын
Hitchens is the McDonald’s of the intellectual world. Mike wife and an inch deep.
@FreethinkingSecularist Жыл бұрын
@@Billsbob You are right, but he was very entertaining for me at that age, and a stepping stone in my discovery of other intellectuals. He was the most important person in many people's journey into critical thinking. That being said I feel that once people get this far they are most likely already moving in the right direction of intellectual consumption, and so hold my critical opinion save those who are obviously misinterpreting it.
@lakotabodine8196 Жыл бұрын
Christopher Hitchens has awesome poise and wit.....just too bad hes so often wrong.
@skipads5141 Жыл бұрын
Fast forward to the 2020s....
@JohnThomas2 жыл бұрын
The more I see of Hitchens the more I like him. Great to see a younger Christopher in action!
@gadams472 жыл бұрын
“I don’t blame you for trying to change the subject”, the essence of C. Hitchens. Polite with a big punch in the face.
@pjdiver32 жыл бұрын
By today's standards, that would be "transphobic". Seems like we've lost so much ground in public discourse
@ahtech19902 жыл бұрын
My favorite take down of this whole thing is when Hicthens said "Excuse me sir, but I've done a lot of work to get into America, you were just born here."
@disct1597 Жыл бұрын
Noam Chomsky was the politest in his come backs too with the ugliest arrogance of Buckley but I agree CH had the punch.
@WeatherStationZ41 Жыл бұрын
@@pjdiver3 Huh? We all make ourselves mad through contrived arguments in our head once in a while but typically you should keep that to yourself
@keithklassen532011 ай бұрын
@@pjdiver3 Indeed, we have lost ground in public discourse; nobody on the panel, not even the infantile Tyrrell, would have made such a gross flight of fancy as you just made with a straight face.
@101wormwood10 жыл бұрын
sitting in the middle of two people that want to discredit and demonize you. I wish I had his mental abilities and fortitude. Hitchens really is IMO a singularly amazing mind.
@torment3d10 жыл бұрын
Simply remind yourself that there's no need to let emotions get in the way of discussions - it actually gives you a serious leg up in any discussion, as it allows you to organise your thoughts for a superior argument :)
@greysongeiler40676 жыл бұрын
love Hitch in an ideological debate! too bad his ideology is fundamentally unsound
@desnebula56996 жыл бұрын
You can feel the tension of the whole debate. Its like a make or break fight for survival
@toast26102 жыл бұрын
Nothing better to watch than a bunch of Sophists one-upping the other in new ways.
@Eli-qu4bs8 жыл бұрын
"I'm quite happy to grant you that a woman would need to be happy go lucky to associate with you." +1 point to Mr Hitchens.
@vanguard40655 жыл бұрын
versus a woman who is desperate to be with a hutchens who is more committed to a bottle than any lady
@tomaszkostyra7554 Жыл бұрын
It was a cheap shot, classic ad personam argument. He made many more came in the same vein. Despite his intellect he liked to use them.
@robertgaul9946 Жыл бұрын
@@tomaszkostyra7554 ... he was also responding to Tyrell's charge of lying ( Hitchen's accurate take on the accusation of inexactitude.)
@trentrock3210 Жыл бұрын
I think that comment was apt in the context of that part of the discussion. The author of the book was revealing that his view of women was directly related to the women he associated with.
@WeatherStationZ41 Жыл бұрын
@@tomaszkostyra7554 Alternatively known as a "joke"
@legpad58578 ай бұрын
I almost didn't recognize our brilliant orator provocateur, but not surprised his brilliance was so evident even when so young.
@Locateson Жыл бұрын
The ability to erudite about the issues being discussed between Hitchens und Buckley is so very enjoyable.
@Locateson Жыл бұрын
The third guy hardly gets a word in, that's a bit sad
@TerryUniGeezerPeterson9 жыл бұрын
Emmett Tyrell (whoever he is) is dead ringer for Norm MacDonald! (Especially the thumbnail for this vid).
@Libbathegreat9 жыл бұрын
I take it you're referring to Emmett Tyrell, and yes he does look like McD. However while Tyrell is certainly a " 'tard" of some description, he is not a liberal. He was (and remains) the editor of the American Spectator, which as a publication could not be said to be liberal by any stretch- unless of course you categorize anything even slightly to the left of Genghis Khan as liberal. There's nothing in his statements that would be out of place in a Tea Party pamphlet today, except of course he's more well-spoken. As conservative commentators go, Tyrell is certainly a lightweight compared to Buckley himself (or even to Hitchens' own brother, Peter, who is masterful), and therefore his presence in this discussion was entirely superfluous.
@lMrFresno559l9 жыл бұрын
Did you just call that guy a Liberal? Da Faq? Is that how far the right has become that you think of him as a Liberal? HA! The only Liberal on that panel has Hitchens. He was a Republican at death but was once a Socialist/Liberal. The Iraq war turned him Republican. But Tyrell was a Republican. HA. Its like saying Regan is a Liberal.
@hallerd9 жыл бұрын
***** Hitch was never a Republican. If anything, he was a lifelong independent. Please do not slander his memory.
@SeanSmithDash9 жыл бұрын
***** Well said, except that Hitchens didn't become a Republican. He did take a Neocon stance on the war against Islamists - - or as he would have said, Theocratic Fascism. On all other matters he remained on the Left.
@bobbysflying33699 жыл бұрын
***** And that frankly is a leftist view anyway
@WeAretheWalrii7 жыл бұрын
Tyrell accuses Hitchens of being an ideologue while being completely oblivious to the fact that his argument shows his own ideological bias. This man can't argue to save his life.
@sauldinglesteinlll95436 жыл бұрын
I agree with you about Tyrell but Hitchens was in fact an ideologue at his time. He said in the beginning that he was a socialist and he said later in life that he used to be a Marxist.
@reginaldmolethrasher4375 жыл бұрын
The 'ideology' of the Right is not an ideology is the way that the Left's is. The Right believes, broadly speaking, that people must be left alone to do as they wish unless specifically told they can't do something; the Left believes that people must be told they can't do things unless specifically told that they can. The Left has a set of rules which it doesn't like to be questioned, and Left-wing regimes routinely suppress the voices of truth-seekers. The Right simply doesn't do this. The Left's heart is in the right place, but it quickly forgets about its heart when it gets into power. The 'ideology' of the Right is closer to a 'philosophy'. Hence the reason that every 20 year-old angry student can trot out a list of those Left-wing desiderata without having to draw breath.
@rishikakenkre74755 жыл бұрын
That's simply not true.. The Right pushes for schools to educate kids in creationism in favor of evolution and wants to promote abstinence in the favor of sex education. Additionally, the Right wants to completely ban abortion, which obstructs upon individual liberties. The Right also generally supports agricultural subsidies and helping out the oil industry and that is not leaving people alone alone at all, as it's our money going into those subsidiaries. By definition, the Left questions the status quo and challenges ideals while the Right seeks to maintain that social hierarchy and status quo.
@Ptrrrrrrrr4 жыл бұрын
@@reginaldmolethrasher437 I wonder in which way you lean.
@aj1918 Жыл бұрын
I love how Hitchens immediately calls out Buckley’s use of whataboutism.
@imnotdavidxnsx Жыл бұрын
I was depressed to see that whataboutism has been painfully present but unextinguished for at least this long.
@genovo Жыл бұрын
That was impressive!
@beachplumb Жыл бұрын
I love how Buckley immediately pointed out the ineradicable hypocrisy of the left.
@benedictdonald43389 ай бұрын
@@beachplumbmeanwhile, a year later,and the modern right’s hypocrisy is unparalleled.
@beachplumb9 ай бұрын
@@benedictdonald4338 Oh - you mean the way republicans have whined about stolen elections for 20 years, and delayed the transfer of power for 2 months in 2004 by filing lawsuits, but then have the democrat front runner arrested for doing what they always do? Oops…Wait…stop…reverse that…
@Brianbeesandbikes10 ай бұрын
Both Buckley and Tyrell get so fearful of Hitch's truths they can't help but interrupt him.
@Dawkins00710 жыл бұрын
Tyrrell: "I contend that men and women never had to be polticised on the grounds of sex or gender" Buckley: "Well surely they had to be politicsed to give them the vote" Tyrrell: "Weeeell... I'm talking about the present"
@ravercorum205 жыл бұрын
Holy crap I had this video tabbed the whole time, thinking that Hitchens was arguing with an extremely right wing woman and tabbed back in to find it's a curly haired man in a suit.
@TheBlueWilderness2 жыл бұрын
This is like watching a boxer like Tyson or Ali at their peek.. Hitchens was sooo sharp here!! unreal!!
@genepoole1771 Жыл бұрын
And when he had beaten all comers, he then took on the religions of the world, fearless in the knowledge that he could trounce them too (and he did).
@lawrence1318 Жыл бұрын
@@genepoole1771 On the contrary, his confidence was ill-founded: he knew nothing of true Christianity, and preferred to continue to know nothing so that he could shoot down straw men.
@genepoole1771 Жыл бұрын
@@lawrence1318 I think what you mean by "knew nothing of true christianity" is that he did not have faith, but by definition this gap qualified rather than disqualified him from dismantling the doctrinal contradictions and moral corruption of major world religions.
@lawrence1318 Жыл бұрын
@@genepoole1771 No. I actually mean he knew nothing of true Christianity. Commensurately, faith in Christianity consists of an absolute knowing: it is not faith in the sense in which you think of it. So it is not hope, or superstition, or reasoning based on any sort of probability, but an absolute knowing. Hitchens wasn't aware of this, as neither are most people. But that was not the main problem. The main problem is that Hitchens wasn't interested in finding out what true Christianity is. So he simply chose to continue to shoot down straw men to keep his pay cheque coming in.
@audiebavington87894 жыл бұрын
Still watching in 2020. Hitch is amazing.
@purplegorilla95928 жыл бұрын
I find it amusing to observe this Emmett Tyrrell harlequin genuinely thinks he's winning this debate and has the upper hand and is clueless that Hitchens and even Buckley are treating him like an annoying gnat worth swatting at.
@baronvonnembles8 жыл бұрын
+tinote I find it amusing that you consider Emmett Tyrrell a "harlequin".
@baronvonnembles8 жыл бұрын
+Tom Jones Hardly. Buckley and Tyrrell essentially are in agreement they simply have a different way of stating it. The fact you don't understand that proves you are a liberal.
@purplegorilla95928 жыл бұрын
Mark Johnson Okay. Since you don't like "harlequin", which of the following adjectives do you prefer? ...buffoon, joker, fool, jester, clown, pantaloon, blockhead, dunce, dolt, ignoramus, imbecile, cretin, dullard, simpleton, moron, clod... Please alert and I'll edit the original post.
@austin00318 жыл бұрын
+tinote I actually watched this when it was originally aired. I was in high school back then and this was the first time I had ever seen Hitch. I was a Reagan supporter and I remember being absolutely amazed (and annoyed) at how Hitch was able to completely destroy all of Tyrrell's arguments. I've since changed my mind about Reagan and now I'm really sad when I reflect on how Hitch would eventually become a supporter of the NeoCons.
@JosephHF8 жыл бұрын
+NamelessPoster LOL...
@MrSpeakerCone7 жыл бұрын
"I've also read your book more carefully than you have." savage.
@hhumca Жыл бұрын
These are the type of videos that make me love youtube.
@stevenbrucci5 жыл бұрын
Thanks for publishing (part of) the original release date. It'd be nice if EVERYONE did this!
@smackedinthejaw10 жыл бұрын
LOL Hitchen's quick, snappy comebacks to Tyrrell's juvenile digs were classic. Makes Tyrrell look like a bigger clown than he already is. I think Tyrrell likely cried under his pillow that night after such a humiliation.
@alexxandrobloch129810 жыл бұрын
He didn't even notice it.
@emptyelephant845 жыл бұрын
Not really
@DmanDrums5 жыл бұрын
Sadly I doubt it registered, if only it had then I'm sure his character would have been vastly improved
@johndowns38395 жыл бұрын
@Ken Nuppenau Give credit to whom the credit is really due: the right-wing sugar daddies like Scaife, who shelled out the $ to keep Tyrell's barely-read and foundering rag afloat in the 90s
@akselp8 жыл бұрын
That Tyrrell clown is unbelievable obnoxious when he acts all chummy and patronizing . But that is quite alright, since he was wrong about just about everything and is a nobody today and Hitchens was right and is a legend.
@2liveis2fly8 жыл бұрын
+Collin Pruett - Christopher Hitchens surely in later years adjusted (probably more than once) his resume', I'll give ya that. But a neo-con, w/due respect to your opine, I don't think I'd go that far. Especially taking into account he began as somewhat of a Socialist (by his own admission). An real unique individual. RIP ="Mr. Christopher Hitchens"
@joeshmo49298 жыл бұрын
+akselp UH HITCH IS DEAD , NO LEGEND , NO HERO , NEVER WON A DEBATE.
@jackr80398 жыл бұрын
+akselp is this Tyrrell guy huffing helium? What the hell is up with that voice!?
@tombeatty47928 жыл бұрын
+joe shmo I think I've watched all his debates, and all his performances on question-answer/panel shows. I don't think it's an overstatement to say that he steamrolled everyone. The only debate I can think of that, perhaps, wasn't completely one-sided was his religious debate with Haldane. Haldane's arguments were so steeped in formal academia that Hitchens had a hard time attacking him. However, Haldane had the same problem with Hitchens.
@joeshmo49298 жыл бұрын
THE HITCH LOST TO WLC AND A FEW OTHERS IMO. HIS PROBLEM BEING FUNDAMENTALLY FLAWED IN HIS STANCE OF NO GOD. HE WAS CORRECT ON RELIGEON HOWEVER.
@bennfrederiksen25732 жыл бұрын
Hitchens always plays the ball. All of his opponents always end up playing the man. A sign of weakness on their behalf. RIP good Sir. you truly slayed them all.
@SFLogicNinja Жыл бұрын
I get so peeved when a debate devolves into ad-hominem attacks. It’s embarrassing.
@NicoAndSimon Жыл бұрын
Well said
@francoisona5 жыл бұрын
Hitchens ' eloquence was outstanding.
@PTarahb8 жыл бұрын
intro was weird as fuck...
@sammclean40007 жыл бұрын
It wasn't that weird
@SAFbikes7 жыл бұрын
This Sam guy is obviously some sort of assburger weirdo
@boxer123507 жыл бұрын
teamSAF bmx *asperger
@ChillsWithSloths7 жыл бұрын
Black Bellamy You have a low assed standard for what qualifies as 'weird'
@watchtowersociety69956 жыл бұрын
Black Bellamy ....scripted...
@jeffmelchior85737 жыл бұрын
Two intellectual Titans plus some other guy.
@boxer123507 жыл бұрын
Jeff Melchior well said
@youngosify7 жыл бұрын
Jeff Melchior lol!!!!
@jackcslewis20097 жыл бұрын
You must be seeing double.
@jcc1525096 жыл бұрын
Buckley was not an intellectual giant.
@reginaldmolethrasher4375 жыл бұрын
@@boxer12350 Why?
@nateo2005 жыл бұрын
17:24 HOLY CRAP Hitchens slapped the crap out of Mr No name with "I don't feel pain in my ribs,I know a rapier when I see one and I know I haven't been pronged" then "I grant you that a women would have to be happy go lucky to associate with you"
@charlespirate1 Жыл бұрын
Has anyone ever been more pleased with themselves than Buckley?
@jamesguitar7384 Жыл бұрын
I'm afraid Mr Buckley doesn't impress me at all but I'm not American . Gore Vidal really did impress me and I only heard him speaking without even knowing his name .
@joseywales148 Жыл бұрын
@@jamesguitar7384 Bravo 🙌 so well stated
@richardthiele8363 Жыл бұрын
Reminds me of the title of an Anthony Trollope novel, “He Knew He Was Right”
@mikephalen3162 Жыл бұрын
Even though I hold the opposite politics, I always admired Buckley for his place as the foremost conservative intellectual and for his Firing Line programs. Gore Vidal was his equal on the left. Both gentlemen had cause to think highly of themselves.
@dancole57958 жыл бұрын
Wow. While I disagreed with Buckley, he was a brilliant, thoughtful person. Watching him try & save Tyrrell from the skinning Hitchens gives him is fascinating. The saddest thing about watching this is only one of these men is still alive. And it's the wrong one.
@rock07958 жыл бұрын
+Dan Cole "The saddest thing about watching this is only one of these men is still alive. And it's the wrong one." Nice "Atheist" morals you have ;)
@mdem20408 жыл бұрын
lol its harsh but true
@MorphingReality8 жыл бұрын
+Rock 07 I don't know what you mean by 'atheist morals' but monotheists believe Hitch should burn in hell for eternity, is that view in any way comparable and not morally abhorrent?
@rock07958 жыл бұрын
Morphing Reality I'm atheist myself, it's idiotic to want someone dead because their don't share your beliefs.
@undeadstudios1238 жыл бұрын
+Rock 07 i highly doubt Dan Cole legitimately wants him dead and i think you know he doesn't mean it literally. not to mention he never said he wanted him dead for his beliefs he said its sad that hitchens is dead and he isn't.
@Chris-b-28 жыл бұрын
This is so nice for the bits that Tyrrell doesn't chime in while he is being dazzled by his betters.
@Aran_chini Жыл бұрын
Tyrrell’s tendency to bait and belittle rather than debate indicates the poverty of his position.
@aceharris14635 жыл бұрын
When you can see the half-cool, half-frightening smile and the light in Buckley’s eyes, you know he rates the person he’s speaking to. He never looks anything but bored by his own, supposed, chum.
@DjSmotpoker9 жыл бұрын
Why couldnt I have had Hitchens as a teacher in school? When he spells it out things make total sense to me!
@boliussa6051 Жыл бұрын
all rhetoric so shows what you know!
@duzdominosdeliver Жыл бұрын
@@boliussa6051 comments from 8 years ago bud 😂 touch grass
@StarReel9 жыл бұрын
Hitchslapping people since the 80s
@Thindorama8 жыл бұрын
StarReel Hitchens himself has admitted his evolution in political views so no he was slapped here
@kookieless8 жыл бұрын
Thindorama Hitchens still had these views in his later life he was no Emmett Tyrrel in his later life.
@Thindorama8 жыл бұрын
kookieless well if that's the case I'm sorry to hear that such a bright man couldn't overcome his delusions in that respect
@wutangmitch8 жыл бұрын
Thindorama In which respect, exactly?
@LazlosPlane8 жыл бұрын
StarReel Slapped himself more than anyone else.
@iluvatar0033 жыл бұрын
I love at the end when Buckley almost forgets Tyrell's name.
@stzmon Жыл бұрын
The Hitch - as impressive as a young man as I came to know him later in his life through his writings and spectular debates. Wish he were still with us to have a voice a reason commenting on current day politics and increased polarization.
@vanguard4065 Жыл бұрын
care to be specific and let us know where you stand?
@keithfitzgerald876 Жыл бұрын
I am sure glad he's not still with us, as it was nauseating seeing him in all his supreme arrogance for decades. I happen to be a lefty, too, so I agreed with him on much, but what a prick he was.
@S-A-Q Жыл бұрын
Unfortunately he lost the voice of reason with his unwavering support for the Bush administration and support for the Iraqi invasion
@keithfitzgerald876 Жыл бұрын
@@S-A-Q In other words, as long as some public intellectual espouses your same values, he or she is enlightened.
@S-A-Q Жыл бұрын
@@keithfitzgerald876 Not at all. But please continue to misrepresent what I say.
@southshore5169 жыл бұрын
What a great video - wish we could have seen Hitchens and Buckley without this impish third wheel, though. Mr. Tyrrell comes off as a caricature of his politics and can't stop looking into the camera. He's completely outclassed by the two gentlemen to his right. Hitchens best line was "well if you had clairvoyance you wouldn't be in that position in the first place" !!
@darrellfrazier87859 жыл бұрын
Indeed!
@SeanSmithDash9 жыл бұрын
southshore516 So true. Although Hitch's line "and if your aunt had Cojones she'd be your uncle" was damn fine as well.
@rickdeckard10759 жыл бұрын
its called breaking the 4th wall, and its hilarious....tyrell was more focused on tactical issues than trying to sound like a public school snob
@southshore5169 жыл бұрын
Rick Deckard If this were a play or film and he were playing a fictional character, then he might be breaking the fourth wall... but since it's a non-fiction news/talk program, he's just looking into the camera while he talks. Also, I think you mean "private school snob"
@rickdeckard10759 жыл бұрын
southshore516 actually i dont....google 'english public school'....lol....and tyrell is hilariously not following the usual rules of tv...in future, try knowing the subject before you start handing out correctives...
@audience4u27 жыл бұрын
Excellent post on many different levels. Thanks!
@joshorourke49853 жыл бұрын
Say what you will about Buckley, the way he leans back and sound emerges from his skull is very amusing.
@terracomm111 ай бұрын
glory days of Hitchens. understated, perfect dismantling of facetious arguments. always think of him when i read "Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court"
@LukeCorradine8 жыл бұрын
HItchens was a rather brilliant intellectual. I always sense a sort of melancholy in him that perhaps didn't do him any favours. Later in his life he argued his views more desperately, or rather more profoundly, and not always successfully. All in all, he is a class all of his own and his reasoning and intellect, very much missed in this day and age.
@MattSingh1 Жыл бұрын
*Utterly wrong- Hitchens' advocacy of the 2003 liberation of Iraq, for example, was remarkable and bullet proof to the point that it may have been his finest moment. The older Hitchens got, the better he argued.*
@davidhofberg50298 жыл бұрын
"Terminological Inexactitude wasn't what you meant was it? You wanted to call me a liar, didn't you?" Hitchens....You are fucking brilliant...
@HisArchness6 жыл бұрын
That part of the video was awesome.
@kingsman4282 жыл бұрын
Hitch was quoting Churchill.
@johnfisher4872 Жыл бұрын
Excellent debate. We need more of these.
@tonygraf4608 Жыл бұрын
Tyrrell is the funniest political essayist because he is actually Norm MacDonald
@ChrisMM65 Жыл бұрын
If he was he'd be funnier lol!
@darthsadic9 жыл бұрын
If I were the guy in the blue suit, I would've shut my mouth to listen to Hitchens, and then brag about the fact that I once sat beside him.
@Atombender9 жыл бұрын
darthsadic Whenever some younger relatives come to visit Tyrell, he shows them this vid and says "See the guy in the blue suit sitting next to Hitchens and Buckley? That's me!"
@lcambilargiu9 жыл бұрын
Part of the required training to becoming a political hack, it would seem: Proper posture and vocal inflections combined with a complete declension [or abortion] of integrity, of terms [which Hitchens referred to as "elasticity of the definition" (13:16)], and of historic context/reference.
@garysmcdermott8 жыл бұрын
darthsadic You have to remember that this was during the Reagan years when the right wing was proclaiming its victories over the democratic party. It smells of hubris when viewed in retrospective
@foresight878 жыл бұрын
darthsadic Hitchens discusses and analyzes ideas, while blue jacket spends all his time slagging Hitchens for being an "ideolog". Blue jacket is a total light weight compared to the other two.
@Atombender8 жыл бұрын
Gary McDermott Also the time when conservatives like Buckley proudly proclaimed the end of liberalism in America.
@tonyappleby74717 жыл бұрын
Absolutely brilliant, thanks for posting. If only today's political debate shows contained arguments over 'the undistributed middle in your logic' :D
@wessexmom Жыл бұрын
At least they still HAVE debate in Britain; we have NO debate in America, unfortunately, thanks to the woke virus that's infected liberalism. It's a pretty ironic situation, given the fact that America is the ONLY country in the world which guarantees free speech as a right.
@Etatdesiege19799 ай бұрын
Tyrrell really loves the words “ideologue”, “ideology”, and all their permutations.
@thevegandragon4676 Жыл бұрын
There is just no one that can surpass Hitchens - truly a genius.
@Dravianpn02 Жыл бұрын
Thomas Sowell could go toe to toe.
@corruptgunslinger8 жыл бұрын
Ugh, I listen to Tyrell and all I think is, "This guy sounds like the origin story of FOX News."
@DieFlabbergast8 жыл бұрын
+Dylan Cantwell (DylanTheVillain9) Well-noticed! Of course, Tyrell is a lot smarter than most of the bunch at Fox, but also a lot slimier.
@Gooberpatrol667 жыл бұрын
>but also a lot slimier. That's a pretty impressive feat.
@igotboredbutcouldntthinkof80188 жыл бұрын
Hitch's sock and tie combo.. killing it.
@louiset34385 жыл бұрын
Check out SCTV’s Joe Flaherty’s impersonation of William F. Buckley ... he NAILS him, it’s hysterical!!
@eviltaylor12 жыл бұрын
That first 10 seconds is like being a non local walking into my village pub.
@Unsung_Earth2 жыл бұрын
Looool And also like the scene in An American Werewolf in London when the two Americans walk in to the pub
@eviltaylor12 жыл бұрын
@@Unsung_Earth I love how that scene looks so foreboding to people but it's every village pub "ENOUGH!, that's enough".