Christopher Nolan Talks About PLANE SCENE In TENET #christophernolan #boeing747 #tenet
Пікірлер: 78
@djboyn4 жыл бұрын
The producers: for the airplane crash let's use miniatures Nolan: I bought the real plane. It seemed neater
@kokomanation4 жыл бұрын
the Lamborghini then much more subtle
@프레디khjfreddy4 жыл бұрын
Got the inception reference!
@kOoLppT1914 жыл бұрын
Nolan continues to show why he is already one of the best of all time
@krishnabhagath24054 жыл бұрын
Thanks for your support for nolan broo but plzzz dnt say him one of the greatest but he's the one of a kind and the greatest on dis planet earth who can deliver blockbuster with mindbending deep concept movies
@kOoLppT1914 жыл бұрын
Krishna Sammrat so then why can’t I call him one of the greatest. Am I supposed to wait until he stops making movies? Can I not say that LeBron James is one of the greatest players of all time because he’s still playing? I don’t understand your logic here broo
@ravishb954 жыл бұрын
For god sake he didn't use real blackhole in interstellar
@clubbedtodeath164 жыл бұрын
In a way he kinda did! To create the black hole the VFX team used real equations to simulate the most accurate depiction of a black hole at the time
@swapnilbnits53842 жыл бұрын
@@clubbedtodeath16 well that was absolutely beautiful
@soughnymaugh4 жыл бұрын
That’s why people flock to see his films.
@0vermars5204 жыл бұрын
Bond: we make the best spy movies Mission Impossible: nah bro, we do Tenet: Hold my balls
@hanniffydinn60194 жыл бұрын
Kubrick of our time. He’s pushing the boundaries. Which is now a thing of the past. Also real effects...are always better. You can see fake cgi a mile off. In the Past they only did real effects, that’s why 80s action films are so good!
@reneepeck80944 жыл бұрын
Eh debatable. No doubt Christopher Nolan creates film concepts that have never been done before, but I do think his work is a little overrated. I feel like his amazing ideas and concepts are taken away by the mediocre dialogue and some of the uninteresting characters in his works. That’s my two sense on his filmmaking and if you disagree then I can understand.
@saran52634 жыл бұрын
Renee Peck yeah well when youre developing such a complex script there's only so much character development and shit you can include ... especially in such a limited time ... and i dont think the dialogues are shoddy at all .. now thats subjective and i dont care for your opinion ... i mean do you even realise he how big of a picture he's painting in his films ... and im not even a nolan die hard
@reneepeck80944 жыл бұрын
Saran Doesn’t matter how big of a picture he’s making, if he can’t get down characters and the script then all that falls flat. Legendary filmmaker Stanley Kubrick tackled ideas that never happened before and still made really great characters and a good script like Shining or Space Odyssey. Having complex ideas will only get you so far in making an actual great movie. Christopher Nolan scripts aren’t usually the best. I mean do you remember Interstellar with the whole “love is the one thing that transcends time and space”. There times where he does have both like Prestige and Memento, but those are exceptions and not the rule. When people talk about a movie like 2001 or Clockwork Orange, they don’t talk about just the complexity of the story. They talk about the characters, cinematography, etc. When people talk about Christopher, most of the time it’s just only about his complex ideas. People remember Inception, but will not remember characters like Ariadne or Tom Hardy’s character or anything like that.
@saran52634 жыл бұрын
@@reneepeck8094 he does have character development and script... maybe his detail to that development isn't as refined as Kubrick because he's going a different pathway in that sense ... he wants to be famous for his complex ideas .... Kubrick wouldn't as great as him in that sense...remember great cinema isn't just about how one person defined it.... I mean surely you know how many people go to theatres to watch nolans ... and nolans cinematography and other details are just as good ... I mean really that's just as part of the nolan filmmaking spectacle ... i know plenty of people who would praise those aspects of his filmmaking ..and I've seen lots of guys shitting in that line ... I mean I don't get it ... what's wrong with accepting the fact that love is powerful beyond words .. that it makes people go to immeasurable lengths... also I get where your coming from cause the guy above said those comparisons ... I agree with you in that respect he isn't as well rounded off as Kubrick... but he is as ground-breaking for cinema and movie goers and will be for the future too ... people like nolan and his films don't come around very often
@reneepeck80944 жыл бұрын
Saran But if his ideas have to sacrifice his characters then he should put the ideas in the back until he defines his characters. Sure he brings an audience, but it really is because of the Dark Knight Trilogy. Like people will remember Inception or Interstellar, but no one even talks about The Prestige (an underrated movie) and Memento since they were before Dark Knight . Do you really think he would encapsulate the audience the same if he didn’t make that refine trilogy? Nothing is wrong of having love be the lesson in the film, but it saying that it transcends everything is ridiculous and badly worded. If Christopher Nolan wants to go his own way then that’s fine, but he needs to improve. If his complex ideas are the only reason people go to the theater then he should be focusing more on his other spectrums like characters and plot. And if his movies have to be simplistic for that then fine. Some of my favorite films have a simplistic narrative, but excels in everything else (Prisoners, No Country for Old Men, Blade Runner 2049, etc). I mean even in TV Shows it tells. People won’t remember a complex show like Devs, people will remember shows like the Sopranos because, even though it’s simplistic, it makes room for developing a great story. Some of the greatest shows are extremely simplistic like Breaking Bad, Mr Robot, Wire, Game of Thrones, etc. Simplicity means you have more room of developing everything since you don’t need to explain to the audience about your complex ideas like Time Travel, Dream within Dreams, teleportation, Lovecraftian horror, etc
@josemendezfr4 жыл бұрын
That's the Southern California Logistics Airport located 15 minutes away from where I live. I recorded footage of all the equipment they had put in the Comav Aviation Center where students go to take aerospace engineering courses. Coolest shit ever that my city was used for a Nolan film
@RuleNo2NoNames4 жыл бұрын
Are you allowed to post the recorded footage? If yes, would you be interesting in sharing that in your channel. We as a Nolan fan's would even enjoy that.
@Daniel-pu9fi4 жыл бұрын
Correction: Some guy talks about Christopher Nolan Talking About Boeing 747 PLANE SCENE In TENET
@trinktmalnent77444 жыл бұрын
Yes
@mikedolgin9744 жыл бұрын
thats why he is my favorite
@KaskDaxxe4 жыл бұрын
What's the next part of your plan? Christopher Nolan: Crashing this plane
@kavehthephantomboy Жыл бұрын
With no CGIs.
@pedrokantharia73073 жыл бұрын
Producers : how are you going to do the plane scene ? Nolan : well That part is a little dramatic!
@myellatorres21104 жыл бұрын
Nolan: I want to crash a plane for this movie The crew: ok we’ll get the CGI ready- Nolan: no no no no no no no
@aromaticsnail4 жыл бұрын
Knowing how Nolan dealt with fx on his previous movies, blowing up a full-sized 747 is not a surprise
@AlvinREDDELTA4 жыл бұрын
nolan is a monster director awesome
@rajeshkn18424 жыл бұрын
God sake he didn't directed 2012
@starrysnow74454 жыл бұрын
If he did there would not be 2013 lol
@roodick853 жыл бұрын
This is one of the rare times you can watch a movie and it just gets better every time you see it 👍🏿
@anasshahid2244 жыл бұрын
Nolan is the best 👌👏
@Max_Le_Groom4 жыл бұрын
Christopher Nolan crashed a Boeing 747 into a Hangar during filming, He got out unscathed because of His Directing prowess
@thehotshot86354 жыл бұрын
Boeing 747 costs 230-260 million dollars theh used old plane which wasn't in use so no big deal.
@anilachar3234 жыл бұрын
So they must've done the same in 'Speed'...
@theotherside9314 жыл бұрын
*A real director.*
@rumaysa96494 жыл бұрын
And that’s why his movies are so timeless
@HughBurgessSinger4 жыл бұрын
So... a plane is born out of fire out a hanger?
@JohnWick-vu8kr4 жыл бұрын
Crashing Boeing 747 plane Nolan :in next scene we crashing a plane Boeing 747
@luis18564 жыл бұрын
So the scene where the main character and Pattinson talk about the plane is basically Nolan talking with his crew
@kokomanation4 жыл бұрын
this is his second spy film after Inception
@nemanja46264 жыл бұрын
Inception was about spies? They were thies, not the same.
@abhiruproy85924 жыл бұрын
Inception was not a spy film It was about heist and thieves
@kokomanation4 жыл бұрын
made of reels 24 it was a romantic comedy
@abhiruproy85924 жыл бұрын
@@kokomanation I got you 😂😂😂😂 bro.
@heypalindrome4 жыл бұрын
Well, one could say that there are parts that could belong in the industrial espionage genre, if that is such a thing, however it's mostly a heist movie, a very different and layered heist movie
@okayge_4 жыл бұрын
Chrisopher Nolan is the Elon Musk of filmmakers
@soumyasuvramitra3 жыл бұрын
How much it cost for the Boeing 747.
@Leo-dz5gj4 жыл бұрын
Movie mistake: there is a boring 747-8F, maybe a 747-4F but I guess it's to big for that, anyways, those planes doesn't come with passenger windows, because it's a cargo plane.
@TheRaglins2 жыл бұрын
Hugo talks about films
@MuhammadAbbas-ml2nb3 жыл бұрын
Girls after losing 1 $ 'depresed, angry , crying' The guy after destroying real plane in real building for a movie and then releasing it in pandemic .
@AndroidCovenant4 жыл бұрын
Didn't they blow up a plane in Speed and Die Hard 2?
@davidnavarro48214 жыл бұрын
In Speed yes! In Die Harder, I don’t know.
@SB1110584 жыл бұрын
It was poor... tin hangar and lazy petrol bangs..
@tarmac54824 жыл бұрын
0:59 more efficient to buy the plane? Meaning CGI and miniatures are more expensive that that?
@huyphucmai26614 жыл бұрын
Yeah. And more realistic.
@pavan_kumar5563 жыл бұрын
Yes bro it is cheaper
@Website_designers_la4 жыл бұрын
the plane worth 400 million dollor
@lucianistoc12644 жыл бұрын
It's not, un airworthy aircraft are cheap
@mikeganzert66664 жыл бұрын
@@lucianistoc1264 "cheap"
@lucianistoc12644 жыл бұрын
@@mikeganzert6666 you can get a 747 un airworthy airframe for less than $1 million
@LievenPluym4 жыл бұрын
Misleading title, disappointing video.
@freqku74034 жыл бұрын
Nolan is the elon musk of filmmaking
@anaveragegamingchannel18434 жыл бұрын
And of course the bushy-bearded Arab crashed it.
@fantro10643 жыл бұрын
Waste of a 747.....
@tdoong_23754 жыл бұрын
Second
@johndunphy78354 жыл бұрын
Thank God for nolan. Old star wars star trek 2 star trek 3 those models looked so real. It's a lost art. They still hold up. I can tell cgi from a mile away. A model or a REAL 747!! That's cinema. Cgi is garbage.