Two points of clarification on modeling without subdivision, part 2.

[@kllthgvrmntr]

All the things that I am constantly afraid of in the blender, I meet by chance somewhere and realize that it is incredibly easy to do this! Thanks for the guides!

[@xDaShaanx]

Chris you're wonderful. Thanks for making amazing content. ❤

[@IvoDanielBrito]

Thank you for showing this way of doing things, the more you know.

[@ChrisMills-AmbientSpace]

Very useful. Thanks!

[@6718289]

It is always useful. Thank you.

[@superkaboose1066]

I will say this way of the curve is a little simpler, but for more complex shapes a curve is a great thing to have up your sleeve.

[@ComplexTagret]

So simple. So genius.

[@STANNco]

very cool addition. I'm wondering what good approaches to more organic devices are. Like a canon camera with their smooth bumps and surfaces all around, i attempted to model some time ago, but had to give up at some point on it

[@ayodejiogundiran8666]

Thank you, Again!

[@simonstory29]

I'm just starting out and this is super helpful! Will you be talking about how to add materials later on because that would be a life saver! Thank you, great videos!!

[@christopher3d475]

Yes, that's my plan.

[@myztazynizta]

Subdiv fans will say you need to spend 4 more hours adjusting the topology until the pole is gone or moved somewhere else

[@AleksandarPopovic]

Nice 👍 keep going

[@breality7411]

Can't you grid fill instead of the triangles?

[@davidjacobs8558]

deleting every other spokes at the center of the circle would make them quads, and may improve subdivision model.

[@christopher3d475]

Not in this situation, it still results in visible artifacts because of the irregular shape of the triangles at the pole.