Tamron 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 Di II VC lens review (DSLR lens) with samples

[@debbiefiuza]

Very helpful and informative review. Even a complete beginner, like myself, can understand.

[@jgvbadv]

Do you have this lens?

[@androgyne_sander]

Bought this lens last week for my beater camera, an EOS 2000D. So far I love it. It's good enough for its price (177 EUR all in!!). Built quality is fine. Sharpness is acceptable (I shoot RAW) and AF seems to work ok (need some more testing to properly judge it). I have much more expensive lenses, but they don't render so much better images that justify the high prices. For occasional snapshots this lens blows every iPhone away.

[@JeremyPeeples]

I just picked this lens up and for $200, I love it - it will be a fantastic lens for just going out and about to get shots in any environment.

[@georgesmith3022]

a lot of people trash this lens, but the pictures i look at flickr are very good. what do you think?

[@arpitkhatri7557]

Hi There, are you still using the 18-200 lens? ... I am looking to buy it because it fits my budget, but lot of people are talking trash about it... could you please advise. Thanks!

[@KingPyn2]

I've just ordered one of this and I'm waiting to be delivered. Taking into consideration that now I'm using a kit lens (Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 III) with no stabilization I believe this lens is going to be a good upgrade for me. Hi tehere! New update. I've changed my camera also, Canon eos 77d, and I used my Tamron 18-200mm. I have good results with this lens for the moment.

[@Lord_Wilieson]

do u recommend canon eos 77d?

[@roypronay08]

Do u recommend this lens for Canon 200D mark 2 users???

[@KingPyn2]

@@roypronay08 honestly! At this moment I won't recommend it anymore. Te lens is not to bright and some times the images are not to sharp. If you want a long lens I will recommend 50 - 200 mm.

[@roypronay08]

@@KingPyn2 You mean 55-250 mm???

[@marcp.1752]

thanks much for the review, chris. the lens performs as expected, almost like the predecessor, 18-200 DI without VC from 2005, it wasn't useable really

[@garyolson3315]

Thanks for the video! I'm a bit late, haha. Retired builder in the us. Beautiful building! So on with this, I have often surmised that the reason lenses are not as sharp in the corners as the center, has to do with DOF and that the distance from the corners are greater from the camera than the center. I do realize optical engineers take this into consideration, but projection of a flat surface through a curved lens back to a flat film plane has a lot to do with math. By stopping down the lens, the depth of field is increased, as you know. I'm posting this to help new photographers understand a little more of the optical chain. Fortunately, as of this date 2024, most lens problems are taken care of by modern in camera processors and some great AI photo apps like sharpness and chromatic aberration. Some apps can make a very cheap lens look great with little knowledge by the user. Thanks again!

[@lordam5757]

What's a difference b/w Tamron 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 Di II "VC" and Tamron 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 Di II "XR"???

[@roadnepal9473]

aazam khan same question?

[@aakashkant]

image Stabilization VC = VIBRATION COMPENSATION

[@h2483-g2tm]

​​@@aakashkant what about "LD"?

[@varunmummigatti1018]

Very nicely review video for this lens, I couldn't think of anything else you could've missed mentioning ! I'm between the tamron Vs Nikkor 18-200. Since im a sharpness nut I think I'm leaning toward the Nikkor now.

[@stephenpartridge686]

The issue with this type of lens is lens sample variation, you can get two samples and get two very different results, I had two samples of the original Tamron 18-200 back in 2005, the first one was nice and sharp, the second was very soft, I recently got hold of a sample of the Tamron 18-200 VC and find it quite nice, not as sharp as some but definitely better then the one reviewed here...

[@christopherfrost]

You're probably imagining things when you say your sample was 'better' - test it properly and empirically, and then you'll know for sure. Either way, if Tamron's quality control is as bad as you're suggesting then...that's their problem!

[@stephenpartridge686]

Oh ok, the difference between samples that I've seen is HUGE, definitely not an imagination, even the manager of the store also noticed the differences between 3 examples of the Tamron 18-270, I've also noticed differences between samples of L series lenses, less then the differences between Tamron samples though......

[@christopherfrost]

Like I said, if their quality control is really that bad, then that's their problem, not mine. I'm not going to spends weeks and weeks sourcing out dozens of copies of the same camera lens to give people a probability about how sharp a lens they buy may or may not be. No lens reviewer has time for that - and certainly not me

[@tecnogadget2]

@@christopherfrostbro, he never attacked your review, he just shared his experience with the lens lmao.

[@jan-martinulvag1962]

@@tecnogadget2 Chris is a psyco

[@ruff1draft]

This lens has just arrived and well it does what it does well for the price.

[@SteveyoungphotographyUk]

great job as always. don't forget to take your keys out of the front door Chris. ;)

[@carlaweb01]

As a photo novice, I am finding your reviews helpful and informative. I just wish that I had read this particular review before purchasing! This lens does seem 'soft' which I find quite frustrating. It seems to perform best in terms of sharpness with an aperture of F8 or F10 - even then not as good as my Fuji bridge camera. Until reading your review, I thought that maybe I had a faulty copy. I am now trying to decide if I should sell it and upgrade - or maybe it's still worth using it for shots where sharpness isn't so crtical. Any advice? Although not directly comparable, a friend lent me his cheap Tamron 70-300mm (macro) to try, which seems sharper at the same focal lengths than the 18-200. So I am wondering if it's the zoom factor of 11x for the 18-200mm that poses a limitation for overall sharpness? (the 70-300mm having a smaller zoom factor of just 4x ). Or am I barking up the wrong tree?

[@jelanmaxwell4762]

Great review! I got a deal for 200$ so I grabbed it anyway. Hopefully for the price it'll be a fun thing for a hobbyist

[@chrisvillan88]

I was about to order this lens, cheers for the video and thanks for the heads up! :D

[@williamneuman7783]

It's not a bad lens. Have had one for 2 years and for the most part as a hobbyist, I am satisfied with the results.

[@aleccooks]

I am going to brazil over 2 days :D I think I'm gonna buy this lens and leave my other lenses @ home :)

[@MrOcean15]

I was going to buy t7i....which one lens you thing is good for starting.....

[@IbrahimErgen]

It is around 240US$ in Turkey and I'm sick of use D3100 lenses 18-55 and 55-200.... It was a useful presentation, thank you.

[@cherob1984]

Trying to find a good glass for indoor high school sports. This one came up, is this a good one?

[@natureistheuniverse9276]

I think the lens does a really good job, because you never zoom in, in the pictures when you looking at them. So the image quality isn't bad at all, you need learn to use the lens first 👍

[@wildbill9919]

Wish all affordable superzooms had the focus ring near the front of the lens...instead of near the rear. My Nikon 18-135 and Tamron 16-300 are "backwards".

[@mac8806]

Thank you for your videos! Very helpful!! But would recommend this over canon 18-135mm is stm?

[@ElicarFalcon]

What's the difference between these lenses Canon EF-M 55-200mm and Tamron 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 Di II VC?

[@kalmanudadley6064]

I love this lens i use it in my full frame camera 5d mark iii

[@danrecintotetaniius7925]

i got mine yesterday , im using it on my eos m3, and i'm loving it

[@slxvcq9938]

DEVs you wrote this a year ago.. after 1 year, how do you like it?

[@AlexanderBecker2009]

I bought one a couple of days ago. I think it is a great lense. Of course it has got some issues. I am very critical normally and the resolution is not perfect, but I do not see so many problems within this lense. I think You were testing a bad copy, I am afraid. Best Regards Yours Al

[@2020davidg]

Christopher... I keep searching your site, hoping for a review of the Tamron 18-200 Di VC III - i.e. the EF-M mount version. I keep getting to this video, however. I can't find a review of the EF-M version which surprises me as you seem to have tested every lens ever made. Do you think you will ever do the EF-M version?

[@christopherfrost]

I haven't tested that one yet :-)

[@gavinphillips3973]

Regarding the zoom ring getting loose, I had a Tamron 18-270mm before it met its end on some concrete from about 6 foot up...anyway zoom creep was really significant after around 6 months. For the price though, I was very happy with it even though us Sony users do not get the in-lens V-C option since a-mount bodies have their own stabiliser. I'm now using the 16-300mm and loving it! Its quite an upgrade over the 18-270mm in terms of both build and image quality.

[@ruff1draft]

This is a great lens and less expensive than the Nikon and Canon equivalent.

[@gevaertse]

I love your reviews!!! thank you so much!

[@thelazywanderer_jt]

I have had to "help" the autofocus motor in some extreme cases by gently moving the focus ring towards proper focus actually.

[@lovinaye]

Hi Chris, I have a Nikkon D3300, which lens you recommend me to buy as i am travelling abroad and my previous lense 18-105 is broken. thanks

[@christopherfrost]

I don't cover Nikon lenses, sorry! I think they do a 16-80mm lens or something? A lens like that might be good

[@im.weasel]

I have been looking for an all rounder lens for my Canon SL3. I think Canons 18-135 would be a better choice. The auto focusing is instant and silent. You are losing out on a bit of zoom, but I think 135mm is still a pretty long zoom rang. It is also like $200 more but I guess you're paying more for the brand and the USM tech.

[@spirithawktatanka]

I am looking for an al around inexpensive lens for my Granddaughter's Nikon 7000. Is this a lens I should consider?

[@jazzman1626]

Cindy Ellis You've probably got a lens by now but even so, consider the Tamron 70-300 VC lens. The Vibration Compensation is superb the way it grabs and holds the subject in the viewfinder.It is sharp and so far I haven't seen any chromatic aberration. An excellent lens.

[@jesuisravi]

obviously not.

[@borisdementyev142]

very helpful! thank you for your work

[@dinoatcharterdotnet]

Is the lens supposed to fall out of it's original position when pointing the camera down or did I get a defective lens?

[@recu1]

getting a kiss x8i with this lens soon, very much happy.

[@ВладиславФедотенко]

Can you see twitching of the viewfinder image down before the stabilization locked the image in place?

[@christopherfrost]

+Владислав Федотенко That will tend to happen as the IS kicks in

[@MarkBates566]

will this be ok for my 80 d

[@rosabal56]

Will this lens be an upgrade from the basic 18-55mm that comes with the canon?

[@mosamaster]

How does it compare with those kit lens ? My nikkor 18-55 and 55-200 are giving somewhat ok picture quality on my nikon D3300. But find carrying them with me very difficult as a travel option. When i saw this lense i had great expectation, because of the low price as my budget is tight.

[@christopherfrost]

+mosamaster I don't know much about Nikon lenses. The 18-55 should be a little bit sharper

[@mosamaster]

Christopher Frost Photography thanks a lot for the reply. God bless. :)

[@aaronstaana]

can you do a video how this lens holds up with an a6600/6400?

[@christopherfrost]

If you can buy me that camera, and a copy of the lens, I'll be happy to :-)

[@wishwanderer5664]

Dear Sir, I am currently looking for an all purpose lens like this for my APS-C DX Nikon D5300 and thus have come across this video. I have a question however. I have this Tamron 18-200 and the Nikkor 18-140g lens on my radar. Which would be a better choice. Will it be the TAMRON which is providing a better reach at 200mm at the longer end or the Nikon one which I presume is better in terms of sharpness and image quality ? If that is the case , how far does this Tamron lie behind the Nikkor lens in terms of image quality ?

[@smaakjeks]

I thought I had gone mad when my memory told me this video had shown up in my feed. I'm guessing now that you removed it and reposted it for some reason.

[@nicolabarbati98]

it is possible to change the focus when it is set in AF mode? thanks

[@iphone6607]

which lenes would be the best for a little Marco shooting and mostly landscaping shooting (under 250$..)? thanks for answering!!!

[@iphone6607]

ooh, and I'm using Nikon d3300

[@christopherfrost]

+GON HD There are loads of great macro lenses. I don't know about Nikon in general, but Tamron does a nice 90mm f/2.8 VC USD Macro, and Samyang have a nice manual focus 100mm macro lens

[@iphone6607]

+Christopher Frost Photography thanks alot! my mama and papa (that's how I call them and 16 years old :)) will fly to Poland by the end of the month, I think that they will buy me the lens there...

[@arpitkhatri7557]

Hey, I own Canon 200d Mk ii ... I am looking for an overall travel lens. I'm confused between this and Canon 18-135. Can you (Christopher) or anybody suggest which one should I go for? Im a little tight on budget.

[@kirbytadle7399]

hi sir is this compatible for canon 250d or slr3? your replies are highly appreciated?

[@TrashDaddy1]

It’s actually preferred if you use it on something crop sensor like that because of its huge vinyeting on full frame

[@gypsy00]

Hello, is this compatible with canon eos 1100D?

[@nickurek7549]

Nico Bien yes

[@christopherfrost]

Yes. All Canon mount lenses made since 1987 will work on your Canon APS-C digital SLR camera, except EF-M lenses

[@vedprakash4559]

Sir, is it possible to blur background with canon tamron 18-200 ( Canon 700d)?

[@acaftermath]

I try to focus by pressing half way on the shutter button in video mode. it just doesnt want to focus at all. What am i doing wrong? i have a d3300

[@christopherfrost]

Sorry, I have no idea how to use Nikon cameras

[@DigitalPauper]

Did you ever find a way around this? I'm having the same issue

[@acaftermath]

No solution to this at all, but thankfully the Manual focus isn't that bad at all. So all good!

[@meredithtan3620]

Hi, could you kindly do a comparison between this and it's predecessor the A14 version please? Thank you.

[@swapnilpanchal3498]

does the nikon f mount lens work with the nikon d5200 ?? pls help me out with this ..

[@fairuzarkan6908]

do you prefer this over the 18-270mm di II vc?

[@itsTheTiana]

Does it work in a Nikon D3300?

[@christopherfrost]

+Tiana If you get the Nikon version, yes

[@christopherfrost]

+Soviet Onion I believe the Nikon 3300 is an APS-C camera, so it should work normally as designed, and not like the full-frame camera

[@harshmasih8187]

Yes

[@glenn.c]

Hey there! Thanks for doing this review. Considering the considerably lower price, would you recommend the Canon 18-200 IS(which you did a review of a few years back), or this lens instead?

[@christopherfrost]

Hmm. They're probably quite similar in terms of image quality although there was a certain quality to the Canon lens's pictures that I just liked (don't ask me why). I can't think of any particularly good reason to go for the Canon though, off the top of my head...

[@CJKisame]

Is this good for wedding event?

[@poppalance]

I'm looking to get the Tamron 18-270 for my Nikon D5500. The 16-300 is tempting though but twice a much.

[@dthtr1]

I plan to buy the Tamron 18- 200mm lens because it' s the cheapest of the category . But some people say its autofocus is slow , what do you think ? thanks for answering .

[@christopherfrost]

Watch this video, and you'll find out!

[@RiassmismansBe]

Is this a good lens for sport photography (athletics)?

[@christopherfrost]

Not really - its picture quality is poor and its autofocus is unreliable and it doesn't have a very wide maximum aperture. It will get the job done though, just barely

[@CJKisame]

@@christopherfrost is this good for wedding events?

[@derekgillan7314]

Excellent review, the previous model isn't too bad as optical quality. How could Tamron get it so wrong with this one?

[@luisd82]

Hi Cris. Why does this not work with mirrorless? Even without adaptor? I have a NEX6000. Regards

[@christopherfrost]

+Luis Domingos It should work, with an adaptor. But Tamron already make a mirrorless version of this lens which should be a lot nicer

[@luisd82]

And 5x more expensive ;)

[@yhakult]

+Christopher Frost Photography can you do a review of the mirrorless version as well? thanks

[@dnm4589]

Please help me to decide. Canon 18-135mm f.3.5 nano is lens or 18-200 Tamron is better??

[@blackentrepreneur244]

Which zoom lens do you recommend for street photography? I have a 50MM for portraits I just need a nice zoom to replace the 18-55MM on my Canon T6.

[@christopherfrost]

A 70-200mm f/4 lens might be nice

[@agent-co7xx]

hi, i am going to buy a D5600. but they have 18-55mm+55-200mm and 18-200mm lens.so what do you think.which one i should buy.which with 18-55mm and 55-200mm or one with the 18-200mm? which one will be more picture quality?

[@christopherfrost]

I haven't tested any Nikon lenses, so I couldn't say

[@sigoljin1064]

Thank you very much for your review! It was really good and helpful.

[@MamontMamont-oe7kf]

Hello. Say not take this lens to replace the kit from 18-55 nikon or canon? For me the main thing that he was as sharp as a whale and it is on 18mm in the closed diaphragm.

[@Fedzari]

I've seen your reviews on both this lens and the Canon EF-S 55-250 IS STM. Which one do you recommend for a Canon 700D? Great video's by the way, keep on going!

[@christopherfrost]

+Fedzari They're quite different in that the 18-200 of course goes back as wide as 18mm. The 55-250 STM is noticeably sharper - although the Sigma gives it a run for its money

[@marcusestrella4705]

Edzard Boonen may i ask what lens did you acquire?

[@themayoroumda7286]

Hi can I use this lens with my camera canon 800d?

[@ivanivanov7991]

I have Nikon D7000 and with Tamron all i got is Blur and on auto it does not work ? :(

[@memoriesbydhavalkoriya2625]

Sr i have this lens bt it gives me wrost image quality at 18 mm At 18mm it gives blurry image so what i do plz help me

[@christopherfrost]

How can I help you exactly - what do you want me to do?!

[@CJKisame]

lower the aperture

[@SunilKamat]

Hey Christopher, Tamron released the 18-400mm ultra-zoom lens last year. Do you have any thoughts on that? Are you planning on reviewing it? Thanks!

[@christopherfrost]

I do indeed plan on reviewing it in the next month or two

[@Seranggas]

hi christopher , nice review, i love it. i a little bit confuse to buy a lens. what do you think about canon 18-135mm IS ( not STM ) is a good lens for any time day and night ? tq for your help :)

[@christopherfrost]

+Rangga Saputra Take a look at my review. The image stabilization will help you at night time

[@mzuniz5051]

This lens is really noisy for autofocus. Is there a way to minimize the sound

[@anandrenuka]

should i take this or nikon 18-140mm? my main purpose is street photography and old buildings . the price is nearly same for both.

[@christopherfrost]

No idea, I don't test Nikon equipment. My guess is that the Nikon will be a lot sharper

[@anandrenuka]

ok, thanks a lot.

[@NukaEatsPepeni]

Hey! Which lens would you recommend between this and the Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM for canon eos 550d?

[@christopherfrost]

They're different kinds of lenses. So it depends if you want a superzoom lens or a telephoto zoom lens

[@v1ncn7]

I really like the 100D and I will buy one, maybe used, to replace my 600D at some point! :D

[@shanes.6227]

sony a6400?

[@RoySourav]

Can I use it in m50 canon. Usiny adapter

[@hbk7138]

Traducir texto con la cámara Hello, good video, but is it advisable to use it currently

[@datoron]

Hi Chris, I’m just a new beginner just bought a Canon SL2 / 200D - want to buy an all in one lens Tamron 18-200 or sigma 18-200 ? Both your videos seems not encouraging, any final or other suggestions?

[@christopherfrost]

I'd get the Canon 18-135 STM or 15-85mm USM

[@viveksahay4679]

Which could be a better option for a beginner photographer, Buying an 18-200 mm lens or buying a 70-300 mm lens along with a 0.43x wide-angle zoom lens attachment? Consider the budget to be limited.

[@christopherfrost]

For a beginner definitely an 18-200

[@derreth]

Hello Chris I have a Canon 18-135 mm lens I use on my 60D I am looking for a lens with an equivalent focal range (28-216mm) for use on a 5D is there anything you could recommend?

[@christopherfrost]

Nothing I can seriously recommend except the Canon 24-105 f/4 IS USM 'L'. I haven't really tried anything with much more zoom range on full-frame, except the Canon 28-135 and I didn't really like it

[@2renered]

would this lens be enough to replace canon kit lens ef18-55 and the efs 55-250

[@christopherfrost]

+2renered Watch the review and you'll see how good this lens is.

[@souvlatzis2012ify]

does it work in a Nikon D5200? why i need buy

[@christopherfrost]

+marinn gr If you get the Nikon version, yes

[@letstravelsomewhere]

+Christopher Frost Photography sorry ! what about d3200 ?

[@andriessen]

Hey! Im planning on picking up the Sony A7s II tomorrow and i am still looking for an lens. I dont want to blow another 1000 for a lens. Will this lens be a good choice?

[@christopherfrost]

You can't be serious...if you're joking then that's very funny, if you're not, then you need to put the brakes on everything and look at what lens options you have for that particular camera

[@momsokvisal6382]

Hi Chris! For AF, is it more noisy than Sigma 18-200mm? or better? Thank in advance!

[@christopherfrost]

Hmm, I can't remember - take a look at my review of the Sigma 18-200 :-)

[@momsokvisal6382]

@@christopherfrost With external microphone, it could help to reduce the noise?

[@christopherfrost]

@@momsokvisal6382 Only a little I'm afraid

[@momsokvisal6382]

@@christopherfrost Thank you!

[@deepwafflesmeister382]

Hey Chris hope you are well. I have Canon 750D and I use 18-55mm Lens that came with camera I'm thinking of upgrading to new Lens I am really confused what Lens should I go for. I don't take use camera that often but I do take a lot of picture during outing. I was wondering if you have any recommendations. I don't want to spend big money. Any lens that can be used for all Purposes please help me thanks

[@christopherfrost]

Take a look at my video about upgrading your kit lens, or my 18 low-budget lenses video.

[@rohlajs3724]

Can I ask what bayonet does this lens use??

[@lenne-0815]

Great video, excellent voice, easily understandable content, thanks !

[@teseract]

Newegg had this on sale with a Nikon mount for $99 (now sold out, sorry) so I snagged it. I hope it's better or at least as good as my kit lens, so I can leave it in the closet and my 55-200mm at home unless I know I'm shooting only at 200mm, then use my 35mm prime lens when I want the best image quality close up. I'm by no means a pro photographer obviously. That said I'd probably not have bought it if it was $250, but for $99 with free shipping it was hard to pass up.

[@astigmatik]

Can I use this with the Canon M50 with a speedbooster? x0.71 x1.6 .. would that cause vignetting?

[@christopherfrost]

It is not a full-frame lens, so, you will see lots of vignetting

[@Jvaldes609]

Well I just bought one and I’m going to learn to love it. Hahahahaha

[@williamneuman7783]

I bought the lens 2 years ago. While not the best lens I am happy with the results I get. I use it on a Canon T3 and some issues like chromatic aberration is easily corrected in post. Overall I like the lens. I am a hobbyist photographer, been one for 40 years and have used it for various types of photography. My overall result for my satisfaction is that the lens does well.

[@totmirmis]

have you learned to love the lens?

[@Jvaldes609]

totmirmis I did! Lol a year later it’s a good lens not the best but it’s great for what I gotta do I after all have bought the nifty 50 that’s a great lens for accompaniment. The sharpest is at 200mm 6.3 for portraits nice blur and good for wide group shots at 18mm.

[@mac8806]

@@Jvaldes609 is it worth it? Or would you suggest other lens?

[@Jvaldes609]

@@mac8806 it’s a old lens now but if you get a good deal it’s a good beginner lens, but now a year into it I still like it but if you can find a lower F-stop at 200mm that would be awesome.

[@hanzo3979]

is that good for moon shots ?

[@ericstratmax5083]

i have a question does tamron 18-200 tend to have better image quality than prime lens?

[@realflow100]

no

[@mariuszmeu]

i have a kit lens on a nikon d5200 , nikor 18-55 vr2and i need a litle more .the camera is ok , but the lens ... not quite .i don`t afford 2 , like .. sigma 17-50/2.8 and the second one , i need just one but for great sharp pictures .advices ?

[@christopherfrost]

+marius zmeu Sell every lens you have, and get the Sigma 17-50 f/2.8 OS HSM

[@panchop892]

Where did you purchase this lens? Because I've searched for this particular one but I keep finding a different looking one.

[@kevinmckenna7474]

+Not_a_Mexican- Juan32 you can get it from DigitalRev www.digitalrev.com/product/tamron-18-200mm-f3-5/MTEwNDMwMQ_A_A

[@mashustns]

why was it discontinued?

[@marufkhan393]

which lens is better for photography tamron 18-270 or tamron 70-300 vc usd , plz tell me chris bro

[@christopherfrost]

They're totally different lenses. With the 70-300 you won't be able to get any wide angle shots

[@mr.insane6746]

i am fairly new to this, does it fit on a canon 500d? and work well?

[@tee_m]

It will (EF mount) - it's cheap and not too bad.

[@hannahnoa9108]

hii! i got the canon 700d , is this lens possible for my camera?

[@christopherfrost]

All Canon mount lenses made since 1987 will work on your Canon APS-C digital SLR camera, except EF-M lenses

[@hannahnoa9108]

+Christopher Frost Photography Okay! Thank you so much for your reply!

[@Abhishek-dx4un]

Can I use for Canon 200D ?

[@nickurek7549]

Abhishek yes