Canon RF 35mm f/1.8 IS STM 'Macro' lens review with samples

Did I get a little over-excited about this lens? Possibly...but I really do seriously love it!
Find it here (Amazon affiliate link):
geni.us/canonr...
This lens will /not/ work on digital SLR cameras, or Canon EOS M cameras - only Canon EOS R system cameras.
All sample pictures taken by me on a Canon EOS R camera.
'L' lens hack: • Photo101: Canon Kit Le...
Support me on Patreon! / christopherfrost
Equipment I use to make my videos (Amazon affiliate links):
Canon EOS R5: geni.us/CanonE...
Canon EF-RF Adaptor: geni.us/CanonE...
Sigma 50mm f/1.4 'Art': geni.us/Sigma5...
Canon RF 35mm f/1.8 IS STM: geni.us/CanonR...
Marumi Fit and Slim CPL Filter: geni.us/Marumi...
AudioTechnica AT2020USB+ Microphone: geni.us/AT2020...
Rode Smartlav+ Microphone: geni.us/RodeSm...
Rode SC3 adapter: geni.us/RodeSC...
Zoom H1n Recorder: geni.us/ZoomH1...
DJI Mini 2 Drone: geni.us/DJIMin...
Music:
'Opportunity Walks', Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com)
Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 3.0
creativecommons....

[@Darkhorse88]

I can proudly say I have bought the majority of lenses from watching this channel.

[@obele92]

Same here, since I discovered his channel I always watch his review first before buying any lens.

[@westleyalfonso5303]

instablaster...

[@valentinesgiftshop799]

Me too.. He is the one guy who does consistent unbiased lens reviews

[@dbwgsbesm]

Same here 🙋🏻‍♂️

[@pabloperez4569]

Hell yea! Chris is for sure the most reliable source of lens reviews in the whole KZbin

[@thedondeluxe6941]

I have this lens on my EOS R and I really couldn't be happier! Genius combination and a real workhorse type of setup for both video and still photos. Canon sure know how to make great, cheap(ish) lenses! Only wish it was weather sealed, but I guess that would defeat the purpose of a cheap lens.

[@Hellraiserzzz]

That's an impressively performing lens, especially when it comes to its value. Canon is back in the game, let's hope they make more great and affordable lenses to their mirrorless system.

[@Compo12344321]

its not the same without "Howdy everyone" =) But nice review as always.

[@JokingJay]

I also felt the "It's me" was a little presumptuous, even though I think he's earned it at this point ;)

[@kian8382]

"it's me" sounds like an old friend, I super love that.

[@kahnjugaming]

I agree, but I think he's doing this just this once. Haha! I prefer the "Howdy everyone!" too. 😁

[@oliveringram3056]

@@JokingJay Better than "Hey guys, what's up" by some guy wearing a peaked hat backwards, indoors.....my pet hate. {I'm 70, which probably explains it..!!]

[@Narmi804]

Thank you for including the AF noise test especially for video using internal mic. Hope you will continue to include it on all of your future lens reviews. Thanks again!!

[@franktorres7963]

"Hi, its me". Now that's an intro!!

[@NizarNoor]

I got this lens and I love it! I really appreciate the light weight and its compact size. And it's sharp wide open.

[@kai64]

I always recommend this lens for beginners. The size and all those features, and undeniably the price! Perfect budget lens!

[@palmcera]

Thank You Chris. It is really cool review. I bought 16, 35, 50 after watching your reviews. I like your editing, peaceful voice, Beautiful church and bible text footages. Lovely.

[@PeteEdmunds]

Great review Chris. Appreciate your thorough and friendly style. Working my way through your playlists slowly. Cheers!

[@Noealz]

im really excited to see what the future holds for canon mirrorless even if it took them a while to get into the game

[@nikonmark37814]

This is a must have lens for me when I go mirrorless. I'm currently using the Canon EF 35 f/2 IS and it is a under rated lens, I use it a lot with my 5Ds!

[@samartography]

Christephor, I know I’ve said this before. But even though I don’t have a lot of the lens you review/reviewed, but I still just watch most of your videos because they’re so good and detailed and I actually remember them even years later, so if I was to buy this 2-3 years down from now I will remember this and watch it again! Thanks

[@christophermcmullen5307]

I too heard great things about this lens. Nice to see Canon back to making a good quality non-L lens.The mix of specs is wonderfully overkill: does everything but edit your RAWs for you!

[@leilasmama01]

I have an R and the 24-105 and a third party 85 but I really want this now! One of my fave channels!! 🥰

[@davidcantu5923]

Great review! Ordered this week for my Canon RP! Thanks again for all your accurate tests and reviews!

[@jamesmonahan9408]

Not only do I love your reviews, Christopher, but I love that fact that you're man of God. God bless you my fellow photographer.

[@christopherfrost]

Glad you find them helpful! Every blessing

[@poelogan]

I never thought I’d say this. But. Dear Sony, Take notes.

[@WesKriesel]

Ha ha.. ;-)

[@albedo0point39]

Yep, this is the lens that really attracts me in their system (and I shoot a7rii). A great value 35mm, plus macro - such a useful walkaround lens. For me, Sony's lenses don't focus close enough.

[@tyroneparker8399]

I got tired of Sony. I had an a6000 for the longest, then got an a7ii and had that for about a year. (Enjoyed my a6000 a lot better than the a7ii). Hated the file formats and Sony just being a headache overall. I got a brand new canon T5i for $150 that came with the standard 18-55 and another auto telephoto lens. I ABSOLUTELY LOVE IT! Canon is more intuitive and produces great products for a great price. Funny how I said I’d never get a canon. Never knock it until you try it. I certainly ate my words. Canon rocks!

[@thegrayyernaut]

@@tyroneparker8399 My old kits were a Canon T6i, a 18-55 kit, and a 55-250 tele, almost just like yours :3

[@kalikhloedaddyparker6813]

Bao Doan I should’ve gave canon a chance earlier, it really is a great piece of kit!

[@ladycris1655]

Your videos are really clear and understandable also for beginners!!your voice is very relaxing!👏🏻⭐️

[@manusk40]

Great to that see you got the EOS R. Hope you're enjoying it. I'm still loving my Viltrox 20mm. Super sharp 👌

[@christopherfrost]

So glad you're enjoying that lens!

[@TEMTECKPHOTOGRAPHY]

I have to stop watching this guy now I;m down another $500.00 bucks.

[@eclipseotik]

Travis McGhee 😂😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣

[@khuo0219]

Add $1000 if you are getting the RP because of it.

[@Princeton_James]

@@khuo0219 that's me today! Shit!

[@JamesWilliams-uq1pm]

😂😂😂😂 I know what you mean!

[@animegeek6118]

😂😂😂😂

[@focusboxmedia5471]

As always you are my greatest camera gear reviewer. Thanks a ton for all your helpful reviews. I own this lens and I am very happy with it.

[@Mosesybanez]

I just picked this lens up like two days ago and it's fantastic I had the canon m50mark2 and my favorite lens by far for that camera was the 32mm 1.4 I loved it it stayed glued to my camera I bought the rf50mm and thought that was an okay lens nothing special but had good enough quailty also have the 100 400mmrf but I then got this 35mm 1.8 rf and I felt the same way I did when I started snapping photos with the efm32mm its great and I'm happy and your videos help alot when I'm thinking about throwing hundreds and thousands of dollars at a new lens thanks for the videos even If I do find them 4years later I just upgraded to an R7 and am loving this camera

[@wolfiemedia]

I have the choice, RF 16mm, RF35mm or RF50mm. I can only get one - which do you think? General walk around shooting. I only have the RF 100-400mm and RF 18-45mm currently.

[@darrenhall4212]

Ive been watching your reviews ever since I started photography in 2014, really appreciate your work and opinions! 👍

[@ckfvideo]

I do agree the lenses in this series can be noisy and this may be the worst offender but realistically anyone who would bother to care about this is going to record audio externally anyways. Spot on review, this 35mm is a real value proposition.

[@JamalPhoenix]

Exactly people love complaining about nothing 😂😂

[@joesimpson5636]

I never buy a new lens until it's had the Christopher Frost seal of approval!

[@sleepingaides]

Says read description below to see how you gave the lens the "L treatment" but I am not seeing anything about that in the description. Just curious. Just got the EOS R and am looking to pick this lens up soon. Thanks for the review!

[@Cagey7531]

Yes, i want to know this too, looks cool with the red ring :D

[@christopherfrost]

Oops! I forgot - I'll put that in later tonight

[@dpenn555]

Christopher Frost Photography Thanks 👍

[@ivandarko740k]

This lens is a must have for the RF system, lightweight for travel.

[@bamsemh1]

I'm aiming for it, for night city handheld photography 😊 the is really would be lovely on the 50mm, that I use to train with 😊

[@marceloweyll]

Dude, whats is thought about sharpness on it?

[@vincenzodellama7158]

@@marceloweyll it doesn't matter... Until they remove the AA filter from their cameras it could be the sharpest lens ever, that it would still be a little soft.

[@webbiker100]

As usual a nice review..... I have the lens myself and agree with all your findings looking forward to the next one

[@jcax44]

Always fantastic reviews Christopher with your own style and branding. I love this lens and camera - very convenient for travel.

[@Funky777Gibbon]

That weir photo was stunning, Christopher. Nice review, as always.

[@B18C5]

The "Hi it's me" grabbed my attention more than the usual greetings. Any way lovely review.❤️

[@virgo47]

Actually, I like that slower focusing for video - not only for noise reduction, but just because I like slower focus change on videos. I wish we can customize focus speed for videos, that would be cool. ;-) Nice review, as always! Thank you.

[@lucifirartwork6234]

Nice review. I'm going to buy this RF 35mm f/1.8L IS STM lens today!

[@diegorivera2711]

OMG first again! An RF mount camera is on my radar to jump to full frame, so it's a welcome review, 35 mm is a very interesting focal length for FF, and more so with that aperture.

[@lazerman121]

WOW saw this video had just been posted les than 10 minutes ago and thought maybe I would be first for once. also no lie I'm viewer 121 :o.

[@jigglygoop6108]

Thank Chris for reviewing this RF 35 mm f1.8 IS STM macro lens. I intended to buy it for my EOS R camera, but I didn't after testing two new samples of it on shooting far buildings (at >150 ft or 'infinite'). The result: the center was not sharp at wide open, but corners were sharp; this seemed unusual. Probably the lens is more optimized for macro or close range usage except stopping down for far distance objects. DPreview compared this Canon lens with the Nikon Z equivalent lens 35 mm f1.8 S, and it seems the RF 35 mm needs to be stopped down to f2.8 in order to get the center sharp at infinite. I eventually bought the Canon EF 35 mm f2 IS for the R, and it performs extremely well at wide open at all distance.

[@Seeitmove]

Very well spoken review, Christopher. Please keep up the good work!

[@fabioroncal8763]

Man i really like your reviews, precise, technical and with examples, nothing like this other bloggers reviewing channels making videos just to get free merch!

[@ThisIsDavesGarage]

This lens is glued to my R6. A must have for casual RF photographers.

[@dexio8601]

Would you say it's sharper than the 50mm RF? Need a travel lens for my new R8...

[@agentdouble-osoul158]

Excellent review Christopher very much appreciated.

[@BackFocus11]

Christipher you da man. Love this channel!! Love your analysis and consistency in testing! Keep it up brother

[@EugeneLau]

The lens that makes people want to get into eos R system

[@officialtiimo]

All the lenses that make me want to get into the system are eff one point too.

[@brandonj8018]

Next up: 35L II and Yongnuo 35 1.4--yes? :)

[@auxmike718]

Just bought this one today! Excellent macro, love it 😍

[@damiengrief]

I've been going back and forth on whether or not I want to spend money on this lens since I got my EOS R. Been using adapted EF lenses and they're great, but still longing for a native lens that doesn't cost $2000+. But then again, I don't need another 35mm lens. My Sigma Art 35mm f/1.4 is already doing its job super well on the R.

[@DanCThorpe]

Hi there. Thanks for this. Any idea how this lense stacks up against the Tamron SP 35mm f/1.8 Di VC USD? The specs are almost identical, both Macro, stabilised and same aperture. I have the Tamron that I'm using on an R5. My adapter has the built in ND filter so I use mainly EF lenses at the moment. Thanks

[@rzlorlnd]

The L treatment video is one of your best videos 😂

[@CarinaKircher]

Dankeschön Christopher for your informative review!

[@TK421-53]

Canon does not have RF mid range lenses. It is either entry level (total package) at mid range prices, or L lenses at an inflated premium. If you are looking at mid range, you have to adopt EF lenses, with (used) EF L lenses being a good alternative to fill in the RF mid range void. On the positive side the adapted EF lenses perform exceptionally well on RF bodies. Externally focusing lenses are a throwback design, which enable a smaller lens at its shortest position, but the extended barrel is a weak spot, which always puts strain on the AF drive system. With these f/1.8-ish primes it is interesting to see Canon and Nikon took a different approach, personally I prefer the direction Nikon took, which places their lenses more in a true mid range level.

[@justinleeportland]

I'm finding it very hard to focus on certain things (plenty of contrast) between 7cm and 25cm or so... At 25cm, it's like impossible to focus on certain things. Try it on a mug for example and there will be areas where it should EASILY grab focus and it can't at ALL. I have tried AF tracking / single point small and normal / servo and single shot. Even Sigma 35mm 1.4 has 0 issues focusing fast and reliably... as much as I LOVE this lens, this is a huge disappointment for me b/c i use that distance alot. Actual 7cm focusing is fine.

[@mitigo]

This was the first lens I bought for my EOS R. I was rather disappointed at how heavy the vignetting is wide open. Overall, it's a very fun lens to use.

[@jondemetrius]

Just got mines today for my r6 mk2

[@lb7144]

Hello, I recently purchased an R6 MKII and have the RF 50mm f/1.8. How well does the RF 35mm work on your R6 MKII? I adapt some of my older EF & EF-S lenses onto my camera also as I transition into the RF line. Thanks

[@muhammadluqmankhan08]

By any chance can you review Rf 35mm f1.8 on Canon R7.. since i have been hearing a lot of bad things regarding this combo.. I am hearing the pictures are either out of focus or softer in most situations

[@sweetscience1988]

i feel at this point in time weather sealing should be a standard

[@tragicbubba]

Hey I love your lens reviews! I was shopping online for a lens that you reviewed and I noticed they had a portrait picture of you in the add.

[@AugmentedGravity]

All RF lenses are amazing.

[@vesock1]

These reviews are so nice. Thanks again for quality content!

[@FidelisG]

The only Canon needs to do with this lens is make a weather sealed version of it, it's optically brilliant considering the price I paid for my copy!

[@j051885]

I watched a review comparing an RF 35, Canon EF 35 L, and a EF 35 sigma art (all primes) Both EF lenses seemed to be sharper than what the RF 35 was showing. Idk if it’s because it was up against an L and sigmas Art lens lines but it got me thinking about which lens to purchase. the RF 35 or the Tamron SP series 35mm 1.4. ( which I heard nothing but amazing reviews on) said to be their “best lens ever made” and “possibly the best 35 out there” I don’t really care about the compact size of the RF lens as much as I do Image quality. Do you believe an adapted Tamron SP 35. 1.4 although $899 is a superior lens than the $450 RF 35 1.8 ?? This Is my brainstorm.

[@jmich5123]

I’m getting this lens tomorrow but if cost, weight, and size are no concern I’d go with the Tamron... it’s faster and less vignetting. The L lenses are in a different category... and price range...

[@j051885]

@@jmich5123 I went with the Tamron.. zero regrets.

[@jmich5123]

Manny_85 great lenses! I had been out of photography for a long time, I can’t believe how good Tamron and Sigma are now. Enjoy!!

[@PHILGOODOK1]

Hello and thank you for this great video and testing. I have for two years this Canon 35mm f2 is usm. I just bought a Canon RP as a replacement for my old 6D. I am using the 35 f2 is usm on the RP with an RF-EF adapter ring. In your opinion: Will the new RF 35mm f1.8 Macro stm perform better than the EF 35mm f2 is usm? The difference in image rendering if there is any, can it justify that I buy this new RF 35 to replace my EF 35? In advance thank you for your response. (Note that the RF Macro option will not be an important point in my decision ...) Sincerely, Philgood ...

[@erwindegier7797]

Did you ever find an answer to this? It looks like the EF 35 f2 is slightly sharper, with faster AF.

[@saintsi6997]

Hi, how does it compare to the EF 35mm IS II USM? best regards Si.

[@christopherfrost]

A review of that lens is coming. The 1.4 is a little sharper but personally I'd just stick with the RF lens

[@beginningballroom]

I love Christopher Frost's reviews. But, I know he is very picky about every pixel-peeping detail, so I am always surprised when he comes back and says, "in spite of all that, I really did enjoy this lens..." I do understand why, to a degree. There is the technical analysis and there is the perceived user experience. I have bought and enjoyed several lenses that have been picked apart here. As well as some that have been given a decent nod. But, only two he has said he loved and only one of which he said he actually bought for himself (the Canon 55-250mm IS STM II That said, I was surprised by how positive he was about this lens. I bought it to use with my RP, in spite of the price (which is a lot for me) and It really is helping me decide to keep it.

[@mikafoxx2717]

User experience matters a lot. I use a 40mm 2.8 on my RP and I bought a sigma art 35 1.4 to be an "upgrade" and I don't like it at all. It feels like it short focuses infinity sometimes and has a more curved focus field at the edges so combined I get focus in the middle at infinity and the edges are closer on the foreground more when doing landscape.. the 40mm 2.8 is sharp everywhere wide open and even better by f4 and 5.6. and it weighs like a pound lighter and well under half the cost second hand. This RF 35mm 1.8 feels like the best of both. Speed, good image quality, low weight, but adding image stabilization and close focus.

[@tinysteelorchestra]

Hmmm, not convinced I should swap my EF 35mm f2 IS USM for this, doesn't seem as if it's significantly better? Another good review though sir, thanks!

[@marceloweyll]

Congratulations for the video! I just want to ask you about one thing, actually, ask you for a recomendantion. I use a Canon Rp, and at the moment with a EF 17-40 L, but it isn’t sharp as i really need (big prints) and i can’t spend a lot of money at the moment buying a new RF L series. Would you recomend this lens to me? Thank you!

[@luisalejos4825]

Excellent basic review Chris. . . .

[@Pablo-Ramirez]

Hello, thank you very much for your video, I love your analysis that you carry out with the lenses, it is very professional for me. I have this lens and I use it with an R6, they work very well, photos, macros and especially in video, greetings from Chile.

[@skyeleake9943]

I really appreciate the coma tests in the reviews :)

[@darkpony8497]

Between rf 35mm and ef 35mm f2. Would the RF 35mm be sharper because it's closer to the sensor and native?; as to the ef 35mm f2 with the ef to rf adapter?

[@christopherfrost]

Their sharpness is almost the same, really, whatever the physics behind it may be

[@darkpony8497]

@@christopherfrost that's fabulous. Thank you Christopher.

[@Johnstonbros]

Appreciate this channel so much! Great consistent to the point videos that are soooo helpful for researching new gear :)

[@Jooolian]

I paired this up with my new EOS RP - great light combo and great introduction to the canon FF mirrorless system. I think I will sell my 6D mk I and my trusty old 35mm f2 (non-IS)

[@firpofutbol]

Is there a way to speed up autofocus in video mode? I dont mind the noise since it's for b-roll.

[@jeffreyfleming4016]

Great review and useful information. Thank you.

[@gelocruz1117]

Can I use this on my EOS R7?

[@mdturnerinoz]

I got mine as soon as it came out when I first got my EOS-R; great lens for sure!

[@ArteUltra1195]

I was really looking forward to this review!

[@Thephotosnatcher_]

Chris reviews are a delight

[@michaelmurray7496]

I recently bought this lens after watching the video. A great lens but lacking in AF speed. If it had a USM motor instead of the STM it would've been perfect. But if you have a subject that is moving it is very hard to nail focus (Kids). On average one to two miss, another two soft and a fourth that nailed it. If the subject is still it works great. Little disappointing on an otherwise great lens.

[@aaronzheng519]

😍😍😍Yas!!!! Has been waiting for this. But I do have a question.. I upgrade sl2 to RP and I have a 24mm 2.8 pancake lens. Does it worth to upgrade to this lens? I’m not sure if I will get significant sharpness improvement ?

[@nilswegner2881]

The 24mm 2.8 does not work on the RP because it's an efs apsc only lens, so you need another lens for the full frame camera

[@aaronzheng519]

DJ Slinus 😅that’s actually not correct. I own RP and currently using this 24mm 2.8 EF-S pancake lens. RP has a function that can crop to 1.6. So when attaching this lens, it will automatically crop to 1.6 and use pretty genius. If it’s a third party EF-S lens, I believe need to manually set this crop fact to use it. But again I’m using a full frame but giving a crop frame result. I’m not very pleased with the sharpness in low light. Even the sigma 85mm 1.4. Without the IS, It’s always a hit and miss even when shutter speed is over 1/100

[@nilswegner2881]

@@aaronzheng519 but what's the point of a full frame camera if you're only using a small portion of the sensor? Of course the camera can work in crop mode but then your resolution will not only be reduced but you will also lose all the cameras benefits like low noise and good low light performance. If you're not using the full frame sensor as one anyways, why didn't you spend less money on an eosm camera

[@mauiuaui]

Christopher sigma 500mm f4 sport review please.

[@BreakingtheChainsofD]

hello how are you wondering what you think about getting the rf24-105mm vs getting the canon 100mm marcro 2.8

[@dr.sommer5069]

Thank you for this video Christopher. But this is the first time I do not agree with you. I had this lens but I sold it after a few weeks. This ancient focussing system where the barrell extendents from the tubus, the loud STM motor (which is louder than the motor in the 100 bucks 50 mm STM), no weather sealing, no lens hood and the heavy vignetting wide open (which leads to a significant increase of noise in post correction) are serious downsides. This lens should cost not more than around 200 bucks. Sry Christopher but I do not recommend this lens at this price point.

[@christopherfrost]

It's certainly true that it's not a perfect lens. But I think the sum of its parts (good image quality, bright aperture, small size, close focussing, image stabilization) make it what it is :-) all the best!

[@hanssolo8364]

@@christopherfrost Dont get me wrong, but this sounds more like a Canon fanboy comment than a neutral statement. You are praising all the upsides and are veiling all the downsides.

[@christopherfrost]

@@hanssolo8364 I point out all the downsides of the lens very clearly in this review, as you will have seen. I simply believe the downsides are quite small compared with its strengths.

[@Noeman2009]

Chill out, man. Not all photogs are dumb, Chris already mentioned the minuses, it's not a perfect lens but if he still recommend this lens there is nothing is wrong about it.

[@Cagey7531]

@@hanssolo8364 Then you realise he was shooting Sony not long ago and Fuji also, seems you really need to check yourself - In this video he points out the softer corners, the loud AF noise for stills, the coma in bright lights for night photography etc ... seems you only want to nit pick on the positives and haven't even watched the video properly

[@weiliu6871]

looking forward for your review on the new Tamron 35 1.4 :)

[@bamsemh1]

If you want even closer with this macro, then remember the reverse macro mode 😉 but without af and is features though

[@marcinlangner1800]

The noise of AF system is a joke in 2020/2021. Review - great, as always.

[@mirage505]

Your reviews as always simply explain the matter..,👍👍

[@littlebritian2822]

Thanks at 4.27 how do you zoom in like that, I can not figure it out. Cheers

[@steedorff]

hi man! can you help me choose between tamron 35 mm f1.8 vc and this little 35 from canon ? I really need a 35 for my wedding video work

[@WesKriesel]

I love the RF 35mm, especially on the Ronin S for video work.

[@KevinDeal]

Love this lens.

[@trioanderscht]

I forgot to say: I love your videos, Christopher. Thanks a lot for your efforts!

[@missgirl8210]

great video! Buying one now. 😊

[@PadminiAshok]

35mm or 50mm RF lens, if you have to pick one? Thanks!

[@nikkiwakatani]

Thank you for this great review. I'm looking for a good small camera and a reasonably fast lens at a good price for my daily use. This video was so helpful.

[@barrrmen]

Should we get this lens or sigma 35mm 1.4 for canon eos rp???

[@GabrielBiff]

I’m wondering which one buy for my new Canon RP. This one, or the 50mm 1.8. By the way, I’m upgrading from a canon 6D mark i with an 50mm already (but ef-s mount so I will not be able to use). Suggestions? 😂

[@bruck177]

Go with the 35mm. The RP doesn’t have IBIS, hence the 35 will be more usable than the 50

[@bamsemh1]

Lens hood + standard filter is a good idea to get. Protection>function 😉

[@stanvisualseychelles932]

Could it be used with the canon m50 with vitrox booster adapter?

[@deelee2834]

congratulations i think if i saw your little hints correctly

[@cjme311280]

Do you plan a review of the rf 85mm 2.0?

[@WanderleyMassafelli]

Hi, can you please tell if the this lens accepts ND or any filter such as UV in the lens front? I'm asking because the barrel moves quite a lot. Thanks!

[@WesKriesel]

Nice review! This is the RF lens I chose to start with, and I'm still very happy with it.