Clinical SAS: TFLs - Live coding of Overview of adverse events table (45 minutes) - TFL_TAE_L100

  Рет қаралды 5,761

mycsg

mycsg

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 7
@prabhusubramaniyan3304
@prabhusubramaniyan3304 Ай бұрын
Hi , your videos are very helpful. Please explain about figures also.
@mycsg
@mycsg Ай бұрын
glad you found them helpful.... will try
@shamm4592
@shamm4592 Жыл бұрын
Hi Query 1 for subjects counts in the above summary table, why Aedecod is not consider as subject is counted only once at particuler AE? Query 2 in above summary table if 1st column contain only 3 rows as Mild, Modrate, Severe and Footnote is given as Subject is counted only once at perticuler AE at highest severity then in such case do we exhicute the same way without considering AEDECOD as you explain? Query 3 If we have Summary Table as Summary of TEAE by Soc, Pt, severity and under Treatment columns we have format as n (%) [E] and have footnote as Subject is counted only once at perticuler AE at highest severity then in such case we have to consider AEDECOD and count the distinct subject at maximum severity across AEDECOD. but how the [E] will be estimated as 1) All or 2) Only respective Maximum Severity Events or 3) Only Distinct Maximum Severity Events ?? kindly explain above queries? Thank you.
@mycsg
@mycsg Жыл бұрын
Response to query 1: As this an overview table, we need to count a subject only once per the criteria required on a row irrespective of the number of events experienced by the subject which meet that row's filter condition. If we include AEDECOD in the by group when fetching the counts, we will get number of subjects with each event, which is not needed here. Response to query 2: In an overview table, if we have segregation at Mild, Moderate and Severe level, we need to fetch the maximum severity seen within each subject, but not the maximum within each aedecod. So, we should not use AEDECOD here. Response to query 3: presenting m count on maximum severity tables is always ambiguous, as you mentioned all three are possible. There is no standard answer to this question. It depends on what your reviewer wants. My personal preference would be option 2 - 'Only respective Maximum Severity Events '.
@shamm4592
@shamm4592 Жыл бұрын
Thanks a lot for timely reply and for kind concern
@saiprasanth9981
@saiprasanth9981 Жыл бұрын
Hi can you explain how to derive TEAE casually related to study treatment and TEAE casually related to study procedure
@mycsg
@mycsg Жыл бұрын
Hi Prasanth, we do not derive the 'casually related to study treatment' information. It will be reported by the investigator on the crf page.
Happy birthday to you by Secret Vlog
00:12
Secret Vlog
Рет қаралды 5 МЛН
Real Man relocate to Remote Controlled Car 👨🏻➡️🚙🕹️ #builderc
00:24
Family Love #funny #sigma
00:16
CRAZY GREAPA
Рет қаралды 42 МЛН
Clinical SAS: ADaM ADAE - TRTEMFL derivation
18:15
mycsg
Рет қаралды 5 М.
1 - SAS Programming Challenges in ISS & ISE
38:41
Varooni Panchal
Рет қаралды 1,8 М.
Clinical SAS: ADaM BDS: 6 Rules: Easily remember the rules
27:46
Happy birthday to you by Secret Vlog
00:12
Secret Vlog
Рет қаралды 5 МЛН