CLUELESS SOV CIT PRO SE IS BACK AND HE FILED NEW APPEAL COURT MOTIONS! With short prequels...

[@OSGCourtWatch]

Links to prior hearings... FIrst: kzbin.info/www/bejne/r5DGo5ual6elfdk Second: kzbin.info/www/bejne/e4vFg2Bsmr-tj6c

[@UnrealNarcissist]

His 'arguments' A. Governmental Immunity Does Not Shield Constitutional Violations Oh my He has no idea but he does believe himself to be quite the lawyer. So embarrassing to read his nonsense. His child's school prevented him from checking his child out of school... He is upset that he no longer gets to order them around...

[@DjastinFaiht]

Thanks. And I am glad Judge S found a way to protect his sanity.

[@bdb3350]

Am I the only one hoping that Judge Simpson says the magic words "Mr. Allen", and this moron is put on his face, cuffed and hauled out of the court room?

[@feliciaward4468]

Thank you so much for posting! I've been hoping I wouldn't miss the next installment of the saga🤣

[@vpreggie]

“I over-stand” has got to be the most egregious abuse of the English language in recorded history.

[@Blasted2Oblivion]

Also the exact moment I would have pulled the contempt card. He is clearly trying to play games with the court and that needs to be stopped.

[@vpreggie]

@ In the “urban” landscape “overstand” can mean either the same thing as “understand” OR that the speaker steadfastly refuses to “spend the energy to understand”. Either way, contempt and life-long ridicule would be my sentence for this idiot.

[@tims4502]

Overstand is even worse than firmament. As it happens dumb sovcits also happen to be dumb flat earthers

[@kosgoth]

Idk 'my honour' instead of 'your honour' is at least just as bad.

[@superexoticshrub]

@@kosgoth That's worse to me because at least the understand/overstand thing could derive from an misunderstanding of what understand means. They're wrong and idiots to think that, but at least that could have a non-disrespectful reason for being said. The 'my honor' thing is straight up just being a contrarian dick.

[@MooseMaunu]

He's playing the old "if I act like a big enough pain the prosecution will drop the case" card. He's in for a heaping, healthy serving of disappointment.

[@joshuawidener8407]

Especially since prosecutors NEVER have done it lol

[@MooseMaunu]

@@joshuawidener8407 Is that you Magoo?

[@joshuawidener8407]

@@MooseMaunu that doesn't even make sense. I'm saying what you're saying in the op doesn't make sense. Prosecutors only drop cases of forced to for the obvious reasons. They surely aren't dropping anything that can carry a prison sentence of all things.

[@MooseMaunu]

@@joshuawidener8407 What doesn't make sense is your comment. Are you trying to make a point or are you just mesmerized by the keyboard?

[@joshuawidener8407]

@MooseMaunu your OP was talking about a person being a pain hoping the prosecutor drops the case. I said they never drop a case. Try to keep pumpkin lol. You are sounding just as dumb as the sovereign citizens. You might want to remember the things you type moron lol

[@gingerhammond6446]

You know you're in trouble when Judge Simpson says, "MR. ALLEN..."

[@Shylade]

Good lord man. I’m worried about him. If he looks up when it’s raining he might drown.

[@KayGeraci]

😂

[@makeminetexas3494]

I don’t see a downside…

[@joshcarter-com]

I haven’t heard that particular expression before. Filing that away for future use. 😁

[@TStheDeplorable]

I so look forward to his sentencing.

[@Hochspitz]

So do I but it won't amount to much.

[@TStheDeplorable]

@@Hochspitz I worry that the prosecutor will offer him a no jail plea as trial approaches.

[@MrLou8888]

I didn't think he could walk and chew gum at the same time.

[@OSGCourtWatch]

Laughin my ass off ML..me either!

[@xhappybunnyx]

let's be real it's probably a sov cit gambit where they think that if a judge asks them to spit out their gum they've "violated the boundaries of their corporeal form on the record" or some shit

[@paralyl]

LMAO Great comment, winner

[@SF-tl4jk]

I was waiting for him to claim that the Judge demanding he spit it out was "another example of the government infringing upon his rights to personal liberty," lol

[@esued86]

It's like listening to a child try and play a lawyer.

[@danhumble9199]

Thanks OSG. I’ve stopped watching other court channels where they insist on narrating and or showing themselves on the screen. I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again…. Keep doing it the way you do it!

[@OSGCourtWatch]

THANKS dan! no plans to change anytning and i REFUSE to put mediocre stuff on this channel. doesnt help that ive got a face for radio and a voice for silent movies...LOL

[@makeminetexas3494]

I don’t mind all of them. Law Talk With Mike is a good one where he stays on the screen. But I hate when a hearing is chugging along just fine and then they stop the video to explain something we just heard very clearly with our own ears.

[@danhumble9199]

@@makeminetexas3494 yeah, ltwm is good. He’s doesn’t often interrupt with unnecessary dialogue.

[@stevewhite3424]

​@@danhumble9199One thing about Mike is that he is a practicing lawyer.So if he talks about the law, it's from a position of knowledge.And if he interrupts to ridicule somebody i'm usually just firing with that 😂

[@pamcadham500]

FINALLY, this is how it needs to be done. If the courts don't get this under control, soon the states legal system is done.

[@tomwhite716]

This guy thinks he is much smarter than he actually is. He is digging a bottomless pit for himself.

[@superexoticshrub]

You'd think that a judge going "I have no idea what you're trying to say" would be a huge red flag to him about his self-representation. But he's deep in the Dunning-Kruger and has no intention of fighting his way out.

[@mikereynolds1368]

This case is turning out to be a case study in the Dunning-Kruger effect. Sadly it'll probably take some jail time for him to even begin to understand (or "over stand" if you will) that he's doing this to himself. I've always been curious why sovcidiots can never answer a simple yes or no question with a simple yes or no lol my guess, it's the baffle them with bullshit strategy.

[@rM-xk9ob]

The judge said "you don't know what you are doing" is a nice way of saying you are being stupid. I loved the turkey remark.

[@Relentlezz41]

Glad Honorable Judge Simpson enjoyed his turkey before these shenanigans

[@finally97]

Nice follow-up. I appreciate the snippets from the previous hearings. Thank you.

[@Shadow613460]

He lost custody of his child and thinks acting like a jackass in court will help him?

[@Blasted2Oblivion]

@@Shadow613460 It's the one good thing I heard come out of his mouth.

[@kerbyfab]

Was that in a different court hearing? How did you find out that info?

[@wildcat1227]

​@@kerbyfab He said it in his last hearing, a week ago.

[@Shadow613460]

@@kerbyfab In the previous hearing with this guy, he said this case caused him to lose custody of his kid.

[@UnrealNarcissist]

@@kerbyfab He mentioned it and then there is a simple search Washtenaw Family Court...

[@robertblackeby237]

Ahhh Mr McGoo you've done it again

[@leofredette19]

Chewing gum in court while trying to defend your case. That's a new one on me.

[@Fletcher-Boy]

Thank you for posting this OSG! This guy will end up with a Mister Allen moment

[@OSGCourtWatch]

honestly FB...i can NOT believe he hasnt gone out the back door already! he ReALLY pushed the judge's buttons HARD!

[@Fletcher-Boy]

@@OSGCourtWatch mister Allen wants to cuff this fool so bad

[@PleaseGodNoMore]

I’m in the process of unfollowing all court channels but this one. Absolutely the best.

[@42words]

yeah, it's pretty much just this one and Court Nerds left in my subscriptions, too

[@wiredforstereo]

"You seem to want this to work in a way it doesn't." Well, yeah, that's what sovereign citizen junk is. That's it in summary.

[@rM-xk9ob]

I wish the judge had put the little thug in jail for contempt. He is filing all this silly nonsense thinking the judge will get tired of him and dismiss the case. He doesn't know Judge Simpson too well if he thinks that.

[@hellboip7876]

Seems like Simpson doesn't run into as many sovcits as most judges and is only moderately jaded and isn't as strict as others learned to be.

[@UnrealNarcissist]

He is unemployed, divorced and lost custody so he is full of vengeance alas, he lacks the legal skills to file a single relevant motion.

[@carter358]

This fool is playing with the wrong judge. He thinks that he can just stall and act like a big enough jerk they'll leave it alone. He's gonna wind up in jail for 30 days or more in contempt.

[@josephh891]

A case of art imitating reality. This guy's name is Mr Magoo. _"Oh Magoo....you've done it again!"_

[@FrenkTheJoy]

I didn't catch him name in a previous video and thought people were just making fun of him by calling him Mr. Magoo at first.

[@josephh891]

@@FrenkTheJoy lol so did I!

[@OSGCourtWatch]

lmao frenk...me too at first!

[@makeminetexas3494]

@@FrenkTheJoy I thought I must be mishearing it at the first hearing.

[@Adiscretefirm]

From what I remember as a non attorney working at a law firm a writ of mandamus is an order for an official to take an action or stop an action. Same root as mandate or mandatory. More common writ of certiorari is an appeals court reviewing a lower courts decision and ordering all trial records to be handed over. Same root as certify or certificate.

[@OSGCourtWatch]

thanks!

[@OldBeachMan-59]

Appreciate the knowledge 🎉

[@wildcat1227]

A writ of mandamus compells a government official to act to correct a mistake, or to stop an illegal action. It is an extrodinary remedy, used in extreme cases when other avenues have been exhausted. A writ of certiorari is a request for appeal. It asks the higher court to look at the lower court's decision. It is how the supreme court selects its cases, for example. Certiorari is latin for "to be more fully informed."

[@DeltaMikeTorrevieja]

A writ to do your duty. Basically if shit isn't happening or is happening incorrectly it's an order to DO YOUR FUCKING JOB!

[@melsamanatha123]

Thank you so much for sharing this vid I’ve been waiting to hear what happens to this bobble head fool.. ❤ Judge Simpson

[@Fletcher-Boy]

“bobble head fool” 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@2tall4shorts12]

I hope the court cost that get levied against him if found guilty reflect all the additional court appearances he created by acting the fool.

[@leese.23]

and...he is STILL resisting and obstructing! Why do I feel that that's his whole life?

[@boomer150]

Lawyers are a lot like doctors. There is a reason they have their own special school that takes YEARS to get through. Because navigating our legal system... well any legal system. Is complicated. The same way medicine is complicated. So representing yourself in criminal proceedings is the same as attempting to diagnose your own illness. You might get it right, but if you do, its going to be blind luck. Not because your smart. These Sovereigns believe they are smarter than everyone else. And they are always wrong. And even in jail, they rarely face the fact they are not as smart as they think they are.

[@eddieromanov]

A writ of mandamus is an order from a court to a governmental official to either perform a specific duty that they are legally obligated to do or not perform a specific action that they are explicitly not allowed to do by the law. I encountered one while settling my father’s estate.

[@Grahamster00]

I always wonder if Mr. Allen knows he's a niche micro-celebrity and people can't wait to hear his named called in these videos.

[@OSGCourtWatch]

oh you KNOW he does. MR ALLEN? Do ya KNOW what a celeb ya are? leave a comment and let us all know (and i am SURE the gals would like a social media link...hehehe...

[@ferretyluv]

Judge Perkins knows and he’s given us a shoutout.

[@jayschafer1760]

I'm surprised that some of the fan girls (and some fan guys, let's not be too hetero centric here) who watch these videos haven't traveled to Washtenaw County and sat in the courtroom with "We ❤️ Mr. Allen" and "Marry me, Mr. Allen" signs. Only slightly joking.

[@Dr_Kyutoko]

Gotta love when they stick to the script no matter what, eh? When asked if they understand, they refuse to say yes, then when told they must answer, you get an "I comprehend"

[@makeminetexas3494]

I so much want a judge to ask if they’ve ever understood an umbrella.

[@Legendkiller6945]

They know everything but never seem to understand anything 😂

[@OSGCourtWatch]

🤣🤣

[@Dr_Kyutoko]

@@Legendkiller6945 That is such a great way to put it.

[@DeltaMikeTorrevieja]

I am cognisant of that which you espouse!

[@edwindrood-s3k]

What an amazing display of stupidity! The more he speaks, the less sense he makes. He actually said "there was no exculpatory evidence" which means you are guilty of what they are alleging!! He doesn't seem to comprehend that fact or stand under it!!

[@voiceofreason9238]

We overstand what you're saying... Hey, there's something wrong with my spell checker. It thinks "overstand" is not a real word.

[@carolejackson5]

Exculpatory = tending to show the defendant is not guilty.

[@edwindrood-s3k]

@@carolejackson5 Yes, that is the definition. At 7 minutes and 45 seconds, the defendant states he wants to " move forward with the discovery hearing because there is still NO exculpatory evidence as far as that I did anything wrong". He has been provided all of the discovery evidence and there is nothing to exonerate him!! Apparently he doesn't understand that means he has NO defense !! It is a truly stupid admission on his part and that's why the Judge responded "what you just said about discovery didn't make any sense." The Judge and I both realized the defendant doesn't know what exculpatory evidence means but is bloviating as usual.

[@DeltaMikeTorrevieja]

He wants the prosecution to turn over evidence they have that shows his innocence. He wasn't saying there isn't any, he stated they hadn't turned over exculpatory evidence he believes is in their possession. If he's correct, the mere lack of it, whether definitive or not, should mean case closed. It's a Brady violation and He walks.

[@edwindrood-s3k]

@@DeltaMikeTorrevieja 😂😂🤣🤣😂😂🤣🤣😂😂 " At 6 minutes in, the Prosecutor stated that the defendant is alleging we have not provided sufficient discovery. The People provided complete discovery". Do you have a hearing issue Delta Mike? The defendant then responded; " There is still no exculpatory evidence as far as that I did anything wrong". Please do not serve on a jury. Thank you!!

[@travisadair728]

The fool who thinks he is smarter than everyone else in the room will wake up next year wondering why he is doing 5 to 10 in a jail cell.

[@racingphotographer8251]

Judge was "nice" enough to let him celebrate Christmas and New Year's out of jail....

[@martinarden9705]

This guy should own an Olive Garden. He could supply the all-you-can-stand word salad at no charge and he'd make all kinds of profits as a franchisee.

[@croach2194]

He is an arrogant not very bright man. You would think he would be getting the idea by now that he has no idea what he is doing. Thanks for the update OSG.

[@RandallChase1]

He thinks that saying “understand” is some secret language that means he “stands under” the authority of the court. It’s such a ridiculous way of thinking!

[@BurntRaisinToast]

This chugnut isn’t clueless - he’s contemptuous.

[@BryanMiller-kb5pe]

A year in jail for each offense, ban them from driving

[@hejnye]

Thanks for the update, we will all see Mr. Magoo again in the new year.

[@jens2old2care]

I dont get how they dont think to themselves: hey, this isn't working well. Perhaps I should change my approach.

[@Bawbag68]

Wasting taxpayer $ to play games.

[@blainedavid9115]

He’s actually not. He’s going to get himself locked up based on his own stupidity. We get the joy of watching it and no money is wasted on a public defender. This is top tier stupidity.

[@elweedskedor2282]

And for wasting the courts time $2500. for each offense

[@feliciaward4468]

Though I'm enjoying watching it lol it is a waste of taxpayer money. Not on a public defender, but on everyone else who is working in that room. They're all paid with taxpayer money.

[@cindyterry347]

All I can say is he's a detriment to himself. It's frightening to think that people like this are actually driving vehicles.Hell walking around would be bad enough and they have the right to vote.That's even more frightening😅

[@aran7teen]

Don’t forget he has the constitutional right to a gun … 😅

[@tranquilrabies]

Someone reproduced w this weirdo.

[@dawnrose69]

Thank you for following this tragic saga.

[@OSGCourtWatch]

was hoping it was a BIT more engaging but i am invested in it now...figured ya TRUE court junkies would be too dawn!

[@Blacksheep84-12]

He’s doing the same thing darell brooks did baiting the judge to frustrate him n to dismiss his charges, I see why he lost his son , he so detached from reality he needs to be in extended stay hotel. Hope he don’t bring the same crap January 2

[@jarrettnelson4035]

I was thinking of the same thing regarding DB

[@jochenstacker7448]

At least Mr. Brooks won't be troubling us anymore.

[@Fred2-123]

I hope he DOES bring the same crap. Simpson should already game him a contempt charge. If he does the same thing on the 2nd, he is likely to get a personal escort by Mr. Allen.

[@ScubaFanatic60]

I was waiting for this!

[@OSGCourtWatch]

Me too scuba! long time bud..hope ya are doin well!

[@wanderarnd]

SovCits demand a speedy trial, then do everything to delay the process... they're hoping that eventually either the prosecutor's office will get tired of it and dismiss, or he'll get lucky and a witness won't be able to appear! I've seen a SovCit, after delaying for months, then claim that he didn't get a speedy trial!! smh

[@davidrenzetti5623]

arrested for resisting reality

[@carolchildofgod1467]

The prosecution didn’t supply him with enough discovery to proves his guilt? Isn’t that for a jury to decide? I mean, that’s the whole reason for a trial. I’m a 67 year old Nana who never took a law class and I know THAT much.

[@amicaaranearum]

The prosecution has to turn over whatever evidence it has to the defense so that there isn’t a “trial by ambush,” with surprise evidence presented at trial. That’s why the court wants discovery to be complete before it sets cases for preliminary exam (the hearing where they determine if there is probable cause to go forward). At trial, the jury will then evaluate the evidence and decide whether the prosecution has proven guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. But what this defendant said was nonsensical. He claimed that his _Brady_ rights were violated when the prosecution failed to produce any “exculpatory” evidence to prove he “did anything wrong.” Exculpatory evidence is evidence that _exonerates_ the defendant; there’s no such thing as exculpatory evidence that proves guilt.

[@Lokisdottir1964]

@@amicaaranearum I caught that too. He is, as Judge Simpson said, using words that he thinks sound good.

[@carolchildofgod1467]

@@amicaaranearum Thank you for explaining “exculpatory evidence” to me. That makes what he said even more wrong.

[@jtm1283]

I love the idea that discovery can't be complete until the prosecution provides exculpatory evidence. If we applied this to all cases, we wouldn't have the current problem with over-crowded prisons.

[@gregsaenz6566]

The gum must be intentional. It’s like going to court in a suit and a baseball cap. No one is that stupid.

[@42words]

"no one is that stupid" you must be new here and by _"here,"_ I mean Earth

[@MrPither999]

I've been looking forward to this one.

[@BillWendell-y5c]

Unusual for Simpson to not have given him 7 days contempt in any of these, he must be taking pity on the jailers.

[@narsister]

Yes! Thank you for the follow up!

[@OSGCourtWatch]

You bet!

[@apokalyps2547]

"There's been no exculpatory evidence that I did anything wrong." That's not what that word means! Exculpatory evidence would be evidence that you DIDN'T do something wrong!

[@patrickj4747]

I catch that statement, too.

[@joebaldus3572]

Do people know that lawyers have doctorate degrees? Do you think these idiots would try self surgery.

[@OSGCourtWatch]

they just might...lol. give em a scalpel and a mirror and lets find out joe!

[@dhc21atyahoo]

Just an observation... higher education does not necessarily mean smarter... even they graduate either in the top half or bottom half of their class.

[@makeminetexas3494]

@@dhc21atyahoo No, but they’re smarter than pro se defendants almost 100% of the time.

[@dhc21atyahoo]

@makeminetexas3494 I beg to differ, they are more informed as to rules and procedure... the sov cit is missing some of the benefits that reality can provide

[@ferretyluv]

Lawyers don’t have doctorates. They’re post graduates.

[@melsamanatha123]

Mr. Sullivan facial expressions are hilarious 😂

[@OSGCourtWatch]

they really were!

[@johntrevy1]

Mr Sullivan:"Why O' why didn't I get into accounting like my parents wanted?"

[@sylviamarquez3763]

I wish somebody would pass a law concerning people who claim to be sovereign citizens, like maybe holding them in contempt of court if they continue spouting bs. It’s such a waste of everybody’s time! 😵‍💫

[@mikereynolds1368]

Hey now, I quite enjoy the entertainment they provide! Careful what you wish for. If only their trust was real and we could make them pay for it all 😅

[@dannylgriffin]

You posted this the same day! You are on it my man. Now we've got to wait until 1/2/2025 to see this guy again.

[@BobBlumenfeld]

Judge Simpson said what I've been thinking for a long time: Some sov-cits throw legalistic words around and think they're making sense, when all they're really doing is exhibiting a sign of the Dunning-Krueger effect. A perfect example: Around 7:45, the defendant says that "there is no exculpatory evidence that I did anything wrong." According to the dictionaries I looked at, "exculpatory evidence" would prove that he didn't do anything wrong, not show that he did, but he got that big, five-syllable word in there -- barely.

[@maryholden3136]

Thank you for this. I needed a giggle. In my head I could hear the words "the wheels of justice are going to roll you right into the county jail" although I don't remember the name of the judge I heard say it 😊

[@DanielHeintzman-bj5zu]

Judge Bryant in Detroit

[@silversurf6159]

@maryholden3136 The words going round in my head when listing to the defendant are......"the wheels on the bus go round and round".........🤣😂😆😉

[@mregecko]

Oh I’ve been waiting for this one. 👀

[@ChaseSkinner-m7e]

Been waiting for this!

[@FrenkTheJoy]

Simpson needs to watch other SovCit videos so he knows to ask if they *comprehend* instead of "understand"

[@OSGCourtWatch]

i think he was just toyin with THIS guy today..lol

[@Fred2-123]

Nope. A judge should not go along with their word games. If he does not know what "understand" means, then he is not competent to be his own lawyer.

[@Lokisdottir1964]

@@Fred2-123 I agree. They shouldn't get their way. The question is a yes or no - Do you understand? By refusing to use the word "understand" they are simply acting like toddlers.

[@amicaaranearum]

7:42 He claimed that his _Brady_ rights were violated when the prosecution failed to produce any “exculpatory” evidence to prove he “did anything wrong.” But exculpatory evidence is evidence that _exonerates_ the defendant; there’s no such thing as exculpatory evidence that proves guilt.

[@GrizzAxxemann]

I would have had him remanded into custody for contempt of court weeks ago. Judge Simpson is way more patient than I would ever hope to be.

[@lindasanford-buttermore2886]

He is NOT the judge to piss off😅

[@6kat103]

Exculpatory means exactly the opposite of what you said, nitwit. This is like candy. I can’t see it enough times 😂😂😂

[@carolmorton7213]

What a fool!

[@konasmom2457]

I recognize him!! Mr. Magoo! I believe he will hinder his chances representing himself.. jk! I’m a dork! I need Turkey! 😂😂

[@alwelle3902]

"The prosecution didn't provide exculpatory evidence indicating my guilt." 1 - Exculpatory evidence is that which indicates you AREN'T guilty. 2 - If the prosecution didn't think they have evidence of your guilt they would drop the charges 3 - Between YOU and the PROFESSIONAL PROSECUTOR I'm going to guess the prosecutor is a better judge of what does and doesn't indicate guilt. This guy is sucking around for a 2 year jail sentence and thousands of dollars in fines, when he could likely plead, get a suspended sentence and a year probation. Also, Judge Simpson should just ask what his objection to saying the word "understand" is. (SovCit "if you say you 'understand' you are acquiescing to 'stand under' the law")

[@MarisuSedai]

God I love watching this guy fail. I hope he keeps coming back.

[@charleskoner9606]

I like the reaction of the (presumably) attorney in the yellow shirt behind him @ 6:25 when DA uses his writ of Mandamus as a suppository for him.

[@Deffbed]

If u don’t understand u can’t agree to disagree..

[@thePsiMatrix]

I think we all heard that 'alright' in Judge Simpson's voice.

[@cheryljones5327]

YAY JUDGE… This is the best.

[@cranken72]

I'd give anything to know what the lady sitting behind him is thinking! 😂.

[@danij5055]

"There's no exculpatory evidence." So you're admitting guilt?

[@Rob86er]

I believe the attorney behind him at the table is getting a kick out of his motions.

[@OSGCourtWatch]

i think you are 100% right! wish i lived close to michigan i would go see THIS idiot in person though would make gettin a vid out a lot harder..dont think judge would appreciate me doin it from his court room..LOL

[@Rob86er]

@OSGCourtWatch I would be held in contempt for laughing if it went on for too long and I was in person. I can't hold it back!

[@makeminetexas3494]

@@Rob86er For me it would be yelling at the guy. But then I’d get to meet Mr. Allen!

[@ericaw7207]

Tried to catch this live and missed it. Thanks for the replay

[@Zerbey]

It's fun to think you can outsmart professional lawyers and judges after reading a few articles online, the reality is this guy is in way over his head and needs to hire an attorney before he talks himself into jail.

[@AlanMalcolm-l8v]

This man is going to put himself in jail without a chance for appeal, and the prosecutor can sit back and watch!

[@lizboard6833]

I'm convinced this fool wants to go to jail

[@delfin9299]

The fact that his name is Mr. Magoo (or McGoo? I'm not sure of the spelling!) is just icing on the cake! I'll be looking forward to more appearances!

[@jcamp5818]

Looking forward to next hearing

[@mjungle773]

Thank you ❤❤❤

[@beng557]

He doesn’t ‘understand’ he ‘overstands’ 😂💀

[@OSGCourtWatch]

just makes him sound even dumber to me..lol

[@beng557]

@@OSGCourtWatch Definitely! 😂

[@amicaaranearum]

“Overstand” is SovCit speak. SovCits don’t like to say that they “understand” anything, because they think it means that they are consenting to the court’s jurisdiction.

[@scottwaid-hz5fv]

Thanks keep it up brother

[@jenniferthacker4231]

He's just digging a bigger hole for himself! What he needs to do is drop the attitude and get an attorney who knows what the heck they are doing! He's going to end up in jail for 2 years for dragging this out and pissing off Judge Simpson!!! I'm looking forward to the next hearing in January!!!

[@Fred2-123]

Simpson will be a softie and not give him any jail time.

[@ferretyluv]

They never end up for the max like they should because the media hates judges that enforce the law and prosecutors that ask for the maximum sentence.

[@nanaj5836]

He learned to not mess with our judge Simpson 😂😂😂

[@SofieAndMe]

It seems his entire goal is to frustrate the system into giving up. His most recent actions still don't make sense from what we saw/heard. Btw, we can we get the body cam? 😂

[@blainedavid9115]

He just screwed himself. He’s proceeding to preliminary examination without all of the discovery he’s entitled too because he’s too dumb to understand the rules.

[@noledoubt3264]

Thank you for your diligence.

[@glenmiller7294]

All sov cits angle to drag out proceedings as long as they can....

[@poppe076]

I'm more invested in this case than I am in anything else in my life at this point.

[@moonshineblues204]

Judge Simpson is a fantastic judge to be pro se in front of. There is no excuse for this 🎉🎉

[@itcomesback]

thanks for the follow-up

[@baskoning9896]

'I overstand' lolllll sov cit fail 100 %

[@andreahoverson236]

Thanks for keeping us updated. I have to say, this guy is a know-it-all jerk.

[@OSGCourtWatch]

You bet

[@KayGeraci]

2:47 in and I just see the end of the title "with short prequels". Goodness I need to pay attention cuz I thought I was going bonkers. Thank you OSG

[@GentleGiantJoe]

The human definition of play stupid games, win stupid prizes.

[@cyana5867]

Thanks Squishy!

[@sallyskellington3024]

This guy isn't a lawyer, but he is going to play one on zoom t.v.! Mr. Magu is woefully ignorant but can spout gobbledegook in a hauty manor.😂😂😂😂