Thanks for watching and I hope it helps you with your decision!
@henryhester18978 ай бұрын
This is great that you’re doing a fair honest test, including your product.
@jamescasey73938 ай бұрын
Thank you!
@svensshed15648 ай бұрын
That was actually really interesting to watch. I would have said that I wouldnt be able to see the difference, but it was noticeable. The Cedrus mast seemed to glide for ages.
@gcammar8 ай бұрын
Hi James, I compared (without flat water paddle ups) a 75cm NL V2 mast to the old non monobloc 75cm F-One carbon 14mm (40% HM) and came to the same conclusion. The NL is stiffer and better with more control in the waves, the F-One had much better glide in downwinders and was overall significantly faster. Fortunately in about a month F-One will release a new monobloc 75cm carbon mast (95% HM and same exact section of the old one) which will be stiffer and should offer the best of both worlds. Cheers, great video!
@jamescasey73937 ай бұрын
Thanks for sharing and excited to see the next generation of masts!
@titouminster43422 ай бұрын
Any feedback on NL v2 vs code+?
@gcammar2 ай бұрын
@@titouminster4342 unfortunately, I haven't done that comparison
@baakquiro73668 ай бұрын
Awesome James !
@__emiduran__8 ай бұрын
Great review!!! Pretty objective!!!! Thanks James!!!
@jamescasey73938 ай бұрын
Glad you liked it!
@Childrenofthefreeworld7 ай бұрын
How bout that wing specific cedrus could be a good sup option ?
@rolandjacques6498 ай бұрын
Good info. Thanks. Side note Have you tested different surface finishes?
@jamescasey73938 ай бұрын
I have not but that’d be very interesting
@mikeoneill26157 ай бұрын
Hey James, what adapters are you using and how do you find the connection compared to the code mast? I’ve got a no limitz mast with the takuma M6 mast connection.
@lukas27135 ай бұрын
would there be much difference between a 75cm and a, say, 82cm mast?
@apricotscrub8 ай бұрын
When you said you could go down a size on the nl, does that mean its more efficient at low end? But doesnt glide as well meaning more drag at mid and high speed range?
@jamescasey73938 ай бұрын
It’s as simple as it’s lighter, like a lighter rider can use a smaller foil 🤷🏽♂️
@Childrenofthefreeworld7 ай бұрын
So good 🤙🤙
@apricotscrub8 ай бұрын
Why in theory would there be less glide on the nl?
@sikguystg8 ай бұрын
longer chord
@tom-foil8 ай бұрын
It's thicker. 16mm all along.
@kylelobisser19628 ай бұрын
@@tom-foil actually Cedrus is technically thicker on average due to the top and bottom of the mast. But it has better glide due to shorter chord length and less wetted area. Hopefully we can start to put the thickness argument to bed. Thin masts with long chord length have more drag than thick masts.
@jamescasey73938 ай бұрын
Longer chord, less taper and maybe a slower section 🤷🏽♂️ unsure of the section though, hard to measure
@scottseale6 ай бұрын
@@kylelobisser1962Is the thickness to chord ratio a better characterization of the section drag? Thanks
@charleschandler66694 ай бұрын
Nice test video. Thanks for making this video sharing it. Having big differences in volume of music and speech is annoying for this viewer.
@jamescasey73934 ай бұрын
Feedback taken on board but a bit of rock n roll has gotta be loud 🤘