Codex Sinaiticus: A journey in Biblical discovery.

[@anindian4103]

Amazing documentary sir.... I'm a 24years old girl from India... I thank God for your life for bringing to the world more and more detailed information about our Messiah.. Praise be toh the Kind of kings ❤👑

[@polokucoch8112]

God Bless YOU! May the Peace of Jesus Christ be upon you.

[@sriramkumar9577]

You have much knowledgeable books in india. Feel shame to accept slavery from foreign country people. Here is what your holy book says, regarding father and daughter relation. Gen 19:31-33): And the firstborn said to the younger, “Our father is old, and there is not a man on earth to come in to us after the manner of all the world. Come, let us make our father drink wine, and we will lie with him, so that we may preserve offspring through our father.” So they made their father drink wine that night; and the firstborn went in, and lay with her father; he did not know when she lay down or when she rose. On the next day, the firstborn said to the younger, “Look, I lay last night with my father; let us make him drink wine tonight also; then you go in and lie with him, so that we may preserve offspring through our father.” So they made their father drink wine that night also; and the younger rose, and lay with him; and he did not know when she lay down or when she rose. Thus both the daughters of Lot became pregnant by their father. The eldest daughter names her son Moab (מואב), which means “from my father.” explicitly pointing to the union as an incestuous one. The younger names her son Ben-Ammi בן עמי, which means “son of my clan,” a more veiled reference to the situation

[@itsme.4285]

Sorry..but I found lies on them. Mark 1:1 of modern Gospel says: The beginning of the gospel of Jesus Christ, the Son of God...but Codex Sinaiticus in the same verse only says: The beginning of the Gospel of Jesus Christ. I understand....this Codex is in Christianity channel so they show u in what purpose they want to get....

[@polokucoch8112]

@@sriramkumar9577 You do realize that this was descriptive and NOT prescriptive.

[@polokucoch8112]

@@itsme.4285 I'm only comparing to islam as an example. I'm not saying that you are muslim. The quran states explicitly that not a single thing can be changed in it. This is NOT a problem with the Bible. Not one scholar, including muslim scholars, claim that the Bible has the same claim. The message is 100% unchanged. If you want to go by textual criticism then this also is not a problem as you will have the Centurion, later in Mark, saying "Certainly this was God's Son." and other examples that show - 'The Son of God' There is absolutely NO confusion on this. If a new doctrine was introduced then that is a problem. Are you Atheist, muslim, hindi? Just curious. Nice to meet and may the Peace of Jesus Christ be upon you my friend.

[@davidsonrazafiarivony6769]

Well done. Thanks to God who preserved His Word for us.

[@chuckdeuces911]

This wasn't God's work, this was the work of the anti power. You should really do a deep study on this codex and the codex vaticanus that by some miracle are both nearly identical in many many ways. It's not a miracle actually, it's most likely because they were written by the same Jesuit sometime around 1450 give or take a few years.

[@billtodd999]

how funny

[@itsme.4285]

Sorry..but I found lies on them. Mark 1:1 of modern Gospel says: The beginning of the gospel of Jesus Christ, the Son of God...but Codex Sinaiticus in the same verse only says: The beginning of the Gospel of Jesus Christ. I understand....this Codex is in Christianity channel so they show u in what purpose they want to get...

[@EstherSHELTON-c5x]

It said the women got scared and didn't tell the others. Strange ,that's the main thing. Go tell the others and they didn't. Hmm. I to am with you on this.

[@markbartlett5049]

The problem with those early manuscripts is that we know little about them. As several of these videos have detailed and similar to archeology world there is too much money and fame involved. The dead sea scrolls are an example of pure text as they were not under any influence as no one knew about them. These Codex have been edited, so how can they be determined as reliable? God has perfectly preserved His gospel for us, read it, believe it.

[@infantryblack]

So great they are embracing tech to preserve and share.

[@davecrawford4377]

Thank you very much, very, very fascinating praise God!

[@botchtriporpayb4059]

Thanks God for connecting to us

[@jonathan1636]

This was a beautiful documentary. It was very gentle.

[@JamesSnapp]

Against the notion that Sinaiticus was one of the 50 copies prepared by Eusebius: (1) Sinaiticus has the (in)famous Alexandrian reading in Mt. 27:49; Eusebius' Canons do not. (2) Sinaiticus doesn't have Mark 15:28 but it appears in the Eusebian Canons. (3) The text of the opening chapters of John in Sinaiticus are of the "Western" text-type, implying that the main Gospels-exemplar was damaged and a second exemplar was resorted to an this point (i.e., these chapters). It is unlikely that a damaged exemplar would be the basis for an imperially commissioned project of 50 copies. (4) Sinaiticus contains Barnabas and Hermas but these books were regarded by Eusebius as disputed, or /notha/. It is very doubtful that Eusebius would include them in codices that were meant specifically for churches to use. (5) The Eusebian Canon-section-numbers that appear in Codex Sinaiticus are so messed up that it is nigh-inconceivable how they could have been added, in the form in which they were added (during production), if Eusebius himself were involved. Also, as J. Rendel Harris said, Tischendorf's story about Sinaiticus being in danger of being burned by the monks of St. Catherine's is very very likely a complete myth. Also, the website doesn't quite have the complete text of the main scribe of Sinaiticus; the last page of John can only be seen with ultraviolet light. T.C. Skeat made just such an ultraviolet-light-enhanced photograph, so his essays can be consulted for that little detail.

[@mrpaul6971]

When even the most elect will believe the lie.

[@chuckdeuces911]

Wow, that was very detailed and I applaud you for being ever so slight about your approach but let me expound in a rougher manner. Tischendorf was a Catholic paid employee. There's many letters of his between people where he says he's a Mary worshipper which is antithetical to the bible as we know it. He was great friends with Wescott and Hort who are the ones who would eventually butcher the modern bibles. Interestingly enough this document was mostly discovered in 1844 which is a very interesting year in which so many pro God movements started but just as many anti God movements were started but thats not anything definitive. The fact is this and Vaticanus are nearly identical which they are also nearly identical to the Vulgate and that's all Roman Catholic and not to be trusted. The beauty of the textus receptus is it was written or interpreted by a Catholic priest from Basel Germany but the kind of Catholic like Luther not the other kind. The Vatican thought he was just using the Vulgate to write this new translation but he barely used the vulgate and instead used 1000s of byzantine texts that were hidden in the Hague Sophia during the Ottoman Turks reign and Rome was never able to get their hands on them or even know they existed. Rome is trying to remove the end section of Mark because of the resurrection. They want to take away Jesus' sacrifice on the cross... plus Mark 16:1 and Luke 23:56 combined proved Jesus crucifixion on Wednesday and resurrection on Saturday night and they want to keep that hidden forever. It's a shame 99% of people use the new translation and have no clue.

[@terencealbertmcbain8041]

Sianiticus is also missing Mark 16; 9-20, Acts 8; 37 and many other verses. Please watch David Daniels from Chick Publications in Rancho Cucamunga CA. he gives excellent support for the truth of Sianiticus.

[@genxin9636]

There are several sources that say that Sinaiticus is a forgery. Bill Cooper, The Forging of Codex Sinaiticus has eleven chapters and footnotes.

[@Tellgryn]

Yes you do not burn Vellum, that was a total lie by Tischendorf. The binding tells you it is a much later work, but the writer being a live when this was going on proves it is from the very early 1840's Tischendorf's stories do not hold up to research and we know he stole other items of worth as well.

[@constancegreiner906]

Very cool of them to share their library. I hope they have or in the process of getting images uploaded onto the internet.

[@edwardfernandez5354]

Educating the public enhances humanity in many different branches of life, wisdom, and knowledge for future generation. Thank you for sharing your knowledge with us. May God Bless You All with health, work, love, harmony, peace among one another, and deep wisdom to understand your work of study, so you can keep educating the public with the virtues God wants humanity to live by. Eda F. and family

[@marleanjoubert4160]

the word of God is amazing..

[@mxracer1999]

Lots of problems with Sinaiticus: the end of Mark is missing 12 verses, the color has been changed, but most suspicious i that scribe 'A" skipped from 1st Chronicles 19:17 to Ezra 9:9. this skip of 24 chapters is in the middle of a column in the middle of a line. o no fragment here. The point is if there is this big of a mistake here can you really trust its authenticity?

[@paulyost3283]

I have been fascinated with this manuscript since the early 1980s and still find every new video, or book, or writing something I cannot overlook!

[@thebernardpurpose2525]

Thank you for sharing this video. i humbly appreciate it. Pbwy.

[@7649angel]

Brilliant!

[@biblicaltimeline]

Thank you 🎉 interesting documentary

[@infinitewisdom4557]

Maybe I've misheard but there is absolutely no mention of a/the 'Resurrection', the corner stone of 'Paulianity'....

[@ensenqui]

Es bueno saber la historia de los manuscritos preservados. Gloria a Dios Jesús ✝️🙌🏽

[@TEDAdventist]

Muchas gracias por tu comentario!

[@jamessheffield4173]

In short, these two codices are old simply because, first, they were written on extremely expensive and durable antelope skins, and secondly, they were so full of errors, alterations, and deletions, that they were never used by true believers and seldom even by their own custodians. Thus they had little chance of wearing away." John Burgon on Sinaiticus and Vaticanus Bing search

[@igregmart]

Amen.

[@koinegreekbible]

It is quite remarkable that you are able to know who used Sinaiticus during the nearly one thousand seven hundred years of its existence, and also whether or not they were "true believers". Have you read Sinaiticus? Do you have enough knowledge of Greek to know how to read it and understand it? I have read the whole of the New Testament and large sections of the Old Testament of Sinaiticus and your comment that it is "so full of errors, alterations and deletions" is totally misleading. As it was copied (by three copyists), each page was checked by another copyist and errors were corrected. I found the same text and the same message as in a modern print of the Greek New Testament, such as NA28/UBS5. You speak of "these two codices". Which is the other one to which you refer? Have you read it, too?

[@jamessheffield4173]

@@koinegreekbible We don't know the provenance of that text, so we have no idea of the faith of its creators. If it had been used in the Divine liturgy for 1400 years, it would have worn out. Blessings.

[@koinegreekbible]

@@jamessheffield4173 Indeed, it clearly was not used throughout 1400 years; it seems to have been largely ignored by the monks in St Helen's monastery, and that has protected those pages that were not removed by them to be used for other purposes, including to bind the spine of newer volumes. For them it was just very old and not very pretty, as it didn't have any of the gold lettering and ornate illustrations that became popular in subsequent centuries. It is however an extremely early text and our earliest copy - by hundreds of years! - of the complete New Testament. It is therefore an extremely important witness to the earliest text. Thank you for sharing blessings.

[@koinegreekbible]

St Catherine's Monastery, not St Helen's. My apologies for the typo.

[@DavidGreen-n1s]

Sometimes we HAVE to look in the Horse's Mouth❤ (THIS IS AS CLOSE TO A "SOURCE" AS WE GET I GUESS) *WELL DONE*

[@SimpleBible]

Very nicely done. Enjoyed this.

[@ChrisPattas]

How about the ending of Mark being added to in later editions. Doesn’t that show that later editors tried to change the gospels?

[@emirhankurt2148]

Yes thats true. Not only Mark, but many other scriptures have been changed or rejected due to indications for the prophethood coming to the arabs

[@posthawk1393]

It shows that if we have evidence someone added something after the fact, it is noted for transparency. We have enough copies that show a common meaning that if someone did change a text, it would stick out like a sore thumb. Therefore, we have overwhelming evidence that the current Word is accurate.

[@fredo69ification]

It wasn’t added to later editions lmao please do research before asking a question based on a false proposition. The earliest manuscripts had the verse you’re talking about and some didn’t.

[@fredo69ification]

@@emirhankurt2148false, these are Muslim lies.

[@ChrisPattas]

The earliest version of Mark that we have did NOT have the verses 16:9-20. Most scholars agree it was added later after Matthew & Luke was written.

[@bassembotros2434]

What is the website where we can check the digital version of the Codex Sinaticus

[@busterbiloxi3833]

It's on the Internet. You're welcome.

[@itsme.4285]

n u will find that there is difference between modern Bible n that Codex.. Example: Mark 1:1 in the modern Bible tells: " The beginning of the gospel of Jesus Christ, the Son of God." Mark 1:1 in Codex Sinaiticus tells: The beginning of the Gospel of Jesus Christ. There is no : son of God in the Codex Sinaiticus for Mark 1:1...

[@jefferyoliver29]

The Sinatic text was written in 1840 by Constantine Simonites and two other guys.

[@thehueseastwings7215]

Facts

[@busterbiloxi3833]

The two other guys were Abdullah the Butcher and The Sheik.

[@koinegreekbible]

This is a conspiracy theory that goes totally against undisputed evidence. I regret that you have mis-spelled the name of the Greek convicted felon who is referred to in this totally untenable theory, and you have added "two other guys", whoever they supposedly were, who are not mentioned by the conspiracy theorists whose crazy ideas I have read.

[@meelahmanifestslove]

As someone who is very novice to biblical text and how many previous bibles there are and the timelines. I have a sincere humble question I’m hoping to get some light shed on. There is a man named Billy Carson , I recently watched one of his videos where he breaks down the concept of Jesus and where his image comes from amongst other things. He mentions the Sinai bible preceding the KJV by at least a thousands years and he also says that in this bible, Yeshua was not sacrificed. He says other things but that was the part that stuck with me simply cuz he had receipts to back up his claims and he seemed very well read, researched and overall knowledgeable. Can someone who has more of understanding and knowledge please shed light on this ? Thank you 🙏🏽

[@koinegreekbible]

I have never heard of Billy Carson but I have read the whole of the New Testament in Codex Sinaiticus and significant portions of the Old Testament, and I can assure you that it gives the same account of the birth, life, ministry, death and resurrection of Jesus as do other manuscripts, including his sacrifice on the cross.

[@ga-so2383]

Peace in all languages German spain arabic Hindu and Thanks for this Dokumentation Thanks god

[@itsme.4285]

Sorry..but I found lies on them. Mark 1:1 of modern Gospel says: The beginning of the gospel of Jesus Christ, the Son of God...but Codex Sinaiticus in the same verse only says: The beginning of the Gospel of Jesus Christ. I understand....this Codex is in Christianity channel so they show u in what purpose they want to get...

[@CDGMR1]

Wow thank you!!

[@SteveSmith-hx2yd]

The last several minutes make the assertion that there are no significant changes in the Sinaiticus and what we have in our Bibles today. The speaker ignores the fact that the Sinaiticus does not have the last 12 verses of the book of Mark that our Bibles today have.

[@May3yad3]

there is corruption like John, 9:35, and John 9:38 change and omitted it says Son of Man, not son of God. And 9:38 not part of the text you are going to find it in the footnote

[@May3yad3]

and the adultery story woman it’s not about that manuscript

[@motstraumen67]

great video. Is this available with the Norwegian still intact?

[@kerronandrewsvisualstoryte7503]

Where can we find the text online to read ? I can’t seem to find it. And where is the original version of this video without a voice over. Just doing in depth research on the subject.

[@bernie4268]

That scroll rightly belongs back in the monastery but I guess for safe keeping the museum is the better place for it.

[@garycottreau8442]

Nice. With that and all the quotations from the early Church Fathers; can piece together the New Testament

[@waywed]

This is a very interesting documentary, however in emphasizing the role of the codex in proving the consistency of the modern Bible it fails to note a glaring problem. The codex includes two books that were highly regarded by 3rd century Christians but are not in the modern Bible - the Epistle of Barnabas and the Shepherd of Hermas. Hardly a resounding endorsement of canonical consistency!

[@Moweezy]

Barnabas literally said that Jesus didn't die on the cross why add something, that is even historically incorrect?

[@waywed]

@@Moweezy My overall point is that the Bible canon is simply an exercise of selective editing over many centuries of many texts to establish an "orthodox Christian doctine" out of many very different narratives - especially on the divinity of Jesus. Even today there is no single agreed canon between Catholics, Protestants and Eastern Orthodox etc. There is no obvious hand of the divine in all this - just men each with their own agendas.

[@Moweezy]

@@waywed Your point is false, because the Bible teaches that in the Body of Christ is no separation which contradicts that Religions/Denominations should be practiced. The Bible scriptures without Textus Receptus are actually those where certain things or verses are being left out ordered by the Vatican. But those with Textus Recepticus that indicates in the verses which proves Jesus divinity and that you only can be saved through him are the original scriptures without leaving anything out. Codex Vaticanus is catholic and doesn’t belong to the original scriptures.

[@waywed]

@@Moweezy Your words "the Bible teaches" just underlines my point about the NT canon being selected over some 300 years to reflect one narrative (essentially the Pauline Gospel and Nicean creed) to the exclusion of all other 'heresies' (eg very early Christians such as the Ebionites who saw Jesus as only human, Paul as a false apostle, and continuation of the Mosaic law). In other words what is, or is not, the inspired word of God depends on which set of Christian texts and writings a person decides to believe in.

[@Moweezy]

@@waywed It’s not on what to decide the NT summarizes the OT. Everything in the New ist already in the Old. Some people don’t understand OT and do false teaching and Paul actually made it right. You got a lot to learn because you cannot define it new when it’s already proved in the Dead Sea Scrolls. Everyone who wrote heresies were not taken, because you can easily differ truth from lies even with the OT.

[@Tellgryn]

The Sinaiticus is not the oldest Bible and has never been tested. First it was written between 1839-1842 and was brought to ST, Catherines to be prove read, as it was a work in progress, the writer of the Sinaiticus when to a Greek school in today's Turkey to check other copies of one manuscript in their library. This work was the idea of the writers Grand Uncle, who wanted to give it to the Carz as a gift from the Greek church. While in Turkey pages of the Sinaiticus were stolen by a very dark character, who lied from the start. You do not burn Vellum it is cleaned and reused. The binding alone tells you the Sinaiticus was a at least from the 1400 range, which was not used before the 1100's.

[@jasoncaine2600]

I first heard of these scriptures from Billy Carson & the Sinai Bible doesn't have a crucifixion. Looking into further myself I've found claim that the man that found these scriptures wrote them himself... has this book been verified as being as old as claimed ?

[@chuckdeuces911]

No, watch a documentary called the great bible hoax of 1881. The claim is a man name Simonedes wrote this as elaborate gifts for a Russian Czar but were most likely for the Vatican. These are basically copies of the Codex Vaticanus which is a copy of the Vulgate. The catholic church wants to be the Christ on earth so they want to take away Jesus' resurrection. It's obviously a fraud. The claim was the monks were using the book to light fires but somehow he still saved it. It's obviously a lie. Adullam films covers this very well. I wouldn't say everything he says is gospel but he's very reliable.

[@chuckdeuces911]

Also they try to remove Mark 15 and the rest of the book. This does 2 things, it removes the resurrection and Mark 16:1 plus Luke 23:56 prove the day of the week of Jesus' crucifixion and resurrection. Matthew 12:40 is the length of how long Jesus was to be in the tomb. Luke 19:31 explains the day after his crucifixion wasn't a regular Sabbath it was a feast day Sabbath which in conjunction with Mark 16:1 and Luke 23:56 shows Jesus was crucified on Wednesday near sunset and Rose Saturday near sunset which debunks all of church traditions

[@karlschulte9231]

Silly . The Apostolic Tradition is what is true, passed on from the Christ through the Apostles down to those who learned at gheir feet, figuratively, like Polycarp and Ignatius. Jesus rose late Sat night which is Sunday. Sunday starts on what we call Sat night by Jewish custom. Thus the midnight resurection liturgy of the oldest Christian church. At the stroke of midnight Christ has risen! Is sung out with great joy. From the earliest times unbroken until now. Mark is the oldest gospel and my educated guess is that his is the story leading to the Resurrection. All the Christians knew what came next. Or else why be Christian? Internal audience to tell what led up to the glorious Easter/ Pascha. No one called it Easter at the time. The others were a bit later adding in other details and for both the education of the new church members but also looking outward as it grew into new lands and people. As John says near the end of his beautiful Gospel that there would be needed many volumes to tell all that Jesus said and did.

[@ricardorivas328]

He rested on the Sabbath and rose Sunday ( Saturday after sunset)

[@koinegreekbible]

As stated in another reply, I don't know who Billy Carson is, but if he says that the Sinai Bible doesn't have a crucifixion, he can't have read it. I have. The same accounts are in it as in any accurate modern translation. This could not have been written by Tischendorf and not a single informed scholar or academic historian accepts such nonsense claims, which go against totally overwhelming and relatively recent evidence (1840s to the present day). It has been verified by the British Museum and subsequently by the British Library as being as old as claimed - from the fourth century (approximately 340-350 AD/CE).

[@j.d.taggart3758]

The fact is Von Tishendorf, who claimed to find the manuscript in a Catholic monastry had a sorted past and a questionable relationship with the Roman Catholic Church prior to the discovery of Textus Sinaticus, despite his claims to being protestant. The manuscript in fact is not ancient at all, and not from the 4th century as claimed by Von Tishendorf, but was written in the early 1800's by a Greek national and calligrapher named Constitine Simonidies who recognized it as his own work and that of his uncle. Both were recognized for their expertise in the use of the ancient Greek language and calligraphy. It production was intended as a gift to the Czar of Russia. For further details see 3 hour documentary 'Bridges to Babylon' produced by Christian Pinto. The manuscript is part of a conspiracy, along with the manuscript Textus Vaticanus, also know as Codex B, to try and undermine the Textus Receptus which is the sum of Greek texts which found their way west after the fall of Constantinople and the Greek Bysintine empire.

[@1Corinthians15.1-4]

Praise the Lord for the truth. Codex S and Codex V are complete forgeries.

[@koinegreekbible]

It was never a "Catholic monastry" (your spelling) and still isn't. Have you read a biography of Tischendorf? I have not seen the documentary to which you refer, but I have read both Vaticanus and Sinaiticus (and many other ancient Biblical manuscripts). Do not be deceived by conspiracy theorists who ignore or hide the evidence that proves their crazy claims to be false.

[@koinegreekbible]

@@1Corinthians15.1-4 Have you read them?

[@1Corinthians15.1-4]

@@koinegreekbible They are complete forgeries. You can't even read them because of the overwhelming redactions in them. They are fake scriptures.

[@phillipbingham487]

amazing

[@Lindsey_Lockwood]

Is this the world's most overdue library book?

[@TEDAdventist]

Could be!

[@TheShowOff2I]

The late fees must be insane

[@bernie4268]

Yep I guess Brits assumed they had a right to get hold of it and keep it. But I guess it’s pretty safe where it is.

[@TruSciencePro]

King James / Textus Receptus only. Do your homework.

[@curiousentertainment3008]

Has anyone pieced together a copy of the early bible using all four of the unical codices?

[@exjwukmusicalescape9241]

Who Darkened the part of Sinaiticus that Tisendorf didn’t take on his first trip? Check out the colour difference between Jeremiah 1 and the rest of Jeremiah…

[@TEDAdventist]

Thank you for your comment!

[@koinegreekbible]

No-one darkened it. It isn't darker. The pages that were photographed in Leipzig were deliberately given a different exposure to make the photographs easier to read. This is a conspiracy theory that is based on a misunderstanding and contradicted by the evidence.

[@matthewherzel264]

Thank you for this! I would enjoy a lot more content on textual criticism and Biblical history. I appreciate that they deal with some popular criticisms of Biblical reliability, but I was disappointed that they only seemed to mention the most trivial issues. No serious student of the Bible or history would believe that all four gospels were written after the Council of Nicaea, for example. Instead, I think most thoughtful NT critics would push the questions back much closer to the Historical Jesus. Questions such as "were the gospels written by eyewitnesses," and "are oral traditions trustworthy" are where the real action is at. Better to skip ahead 300 years and find a pretty document that doesn't challenge any of our beliefs. :) It bothers me when scholarship is used as a tool to convince laypeople of something, and yet only a tiny, carefully controlled narrative is presented. There is no mention of nearly universally accepted textual features, like Marcan Priority, if there's a chance they might make folks doubt. I mean, at the end he says that "this isn't a fraud, no additions have been made!" Maybe... from the third century onward, but there are plenty of frauds and additions in the text of the NT that are nearly universally accepted by even conservative evangelical scholarship, and they would all occur in the very messy period BEFORE Codex Sinaiticus would have been written. We can see it happening in the textual fragments we do have from the first and second centuries. The earliest texts we have are the most varied. The textual tradition went from more chaotic to more stable over time. Father Justin says that the documents we have from the third century are "identical on a macro level." This phrase does a LOT of heavy lifting for him. By saying this, he is able to paper over any difference he doesn't see as significant. But the subjectivity of this approach should be clear. From a certain point of view, my neighbor and I are "identical on a macro level," and yet, we are very different! One example of an addition that has nearly universal support from scholars would be the "pericope adulterae" found in some modern Bibles in John 7-8. It's the story of the woman caught in adultery, but it was NOT in the original text of John. None of the earliest texts contain this story, and in later texts it is sometimes there, sometimes not, and sometimes moved to different locations... even to the Gospel of Luke! Someone added that story to John, probably 100 years or more after it was written. And on the subject of "frauds," surely Father Justin is aware that the majority of scholars believe the Pastoral Epistles (1 and 2 Tim, Titus) were NOT written by Paul, but by a later Christian attempting to present himself as Paul. If that's not a fraud, I don't know what is. These are extremely common perspectives in the field, they are not fringe. At some point, the folks in the pew are going to need to deal with the Bible as it actually is, not as they imagine it to be. Correction: I had assumed that since Father Justin made such a strong claim about there being no additions to the text since the Codex Sinaiticus, that it contained the pericope adulterae... but it doesn't! With this in mind, the claim that "no additions have been made" to the Codex Sinaiticus, let alone the NT, seems quite misleading, or outright false.

[@TEDAdventist]

The biblical history will come in the Moments from Sinai that are being released on a weekly basis through September and October. We appreciate your comments on textual criticism but that was not specifically the point of the programme - and their is a limit to what you can share in a single half hour. Please also note that there is no claim that the Gospels were written after the council of Nicea - only that 50 copies were specifically commissioned and that Sinaiticus was possibly one of them.

[@davidchupp4460]

Not sure who you are but you appear to have zero discernment and to be a clear unbeliever.

[@TEDAdventist]

The play list for that series is available here: kzbin.info/aero/PLHlTyU7ArSTJnFaJiGMVwrG0Fcio5Ep7C

[@ChrisPattas]

Why would God have 4 versions of the gospels if they were inspired by God? Why would they be contradictory or so different. Why would the Gospel authors not identify themselves (the authorship was guessed much later)?

[@fredo69ification]

Inspired by God doesn’t mean written by God, it’s 4 different accounts from different people lmao you’re asking ridiculous questions 😂

[@koinegreekbible]

From the first days the authors were known and there were never any disputes about their names. The authorship was never "guessed", neither "much later" nor even at the time. The gospels are not contradictory. Have you read them, properly, each one from beginning to end? Please do not repeat silly false claims that go against the evidence that anyone can check.

[@elaines5179]

What about the added verses at the end of MARK???? You misspoke. How can you be trusted?

[@Amor-Fati.]

Honestly, until I can learn how to carbon date. And then learn the languages that all confirmed ancient texts are in. Then, after dismissing the lies out there, confirm who has.motive and why. Then and only then, using logic and reason, will determine what is actually true...our creator, who created all the beauty on earth and its life, must be given the respect of truth..

[@carlrosenbaum3754]

Yahovah

[@williammackey7243]

no change, no crucifixion, but no change

[@emmanueljohnson5934]

Tor from Norway... never guessed 😅

[@mariadelrosariojimenezcord1293]

A muy pocos les interesa la historia.

[@TEDAdventist]

Pero a ti si! Y eso es lo que vale, gracias por compartir con nosotros

[@tensevo]

every body just accepts, oh they wanted to burn your books, as a matter of fact, never delve into why they wanted to burn them, why would they be dangerous to the power structure? were they so weak that a few words on come scrolls trigger them so badly?

[@postmcdonald5353]

🙏🏻

[@jpb1231000]

KJV only.... Watch Chris Pinto's series on WHY!!! 1. A Lamp in the Dark 2. Bridge to Babylon 3. Tares Among the Wheat #3 details how Constantine Simonides forged Codex Sinaiticus and Tischendorf 'FOUND" the manuscript in a pile of Fire Tinder after a Papal Visit !!! Simonides admitted it !!!

[@bengiyardimli1925]

If the christians lifted the status of the codex that means it was already used by others before.

[@timfronimos459]

The monastery is a place of PRAYER not merely meditation. What and where is 'sy uh ny' its called 'Sy Ny' Its like the difference between nuclear and 'nuk yoo ler'. Great video otherwise.

[@Justatreecutter]

Sinaiticus is not old. It was made by Simonides who was a contemporary of Tirchendorf. When Tirchendorf brought the Sinaiticus to the public from the garbage bin of the monastery, Simonides recognized his own work and invited Tirchendorf for a debate and Tirchendorf did not agree. Simonides said it was made by him and that he would answer before God on the day of judgment if he was lying about it being his own work. It is not an old manuscript.

[@CharityGal]

The Codex Sinaiticus was NOT found in the "garbage bin." Tischendorf said he found the first few leaves stored in a BASKET. He suggested they would be burned, but vellum is an animal skin that does not burn; it smolders so would NOT have been used for kindling.The complete text was wrapped in a red cloth stored in one of the monk's cells, and he gave it to Tischendorf to study at the monastery.

[@koinegreekbible]

@@CharityGal harityGal, this information that you have given is accurate. Various claims made by "Justatreecutter" go against the known facts that are undisputed by any of those familiar with the manuscripts and the documents published throughout the years of Tischendorf's research, both by him and by other academics and in the German and British press of the time.

[@CharityGal]

@@koinegreekbible Thank you. I have studied this wild story by Tischendorf carefully and am writing a book about the corruption in modern Bibles source based on Codex Sinaiticus and Vaticanus. It is curious that new scientific testing of Sinaiticus was DENIED the very day experts were scheduled to determine how old it actually is. Those who benefit from claiming it is fourth century A.D. want to continue the scheme, though Simonides wrote it in about 1839/40. God bless!

[@karlschulte9231]

Once monks over hundreds of years needed a new copy due to heavy use and resultant damage, they copied it. Wheteher they burned it or scraped off the ink and wrote new things over it depends on local needs. This happened in the West also. There was also a custom taken from Jewish synagog tradition to have a sealed room except for a high window. This was used to discard old books that were useless as a church reade 28:17 r/ sermon research. Too holy to throw in the garbage they were toosed in. Tischendorf was allowed to rummage in there using a ladder and grabbed handfuls to take away. The Sinaticus is not a palimsist and the materials were unavailable in the 1800's. The silly tale about a forgery is usefull only as fertilizer.

[@theophilusmulder3371]

❤️‍🔥❤️‍🔥❤️‍🔥

[@kevinbogerd7878]

I used to believe this “oldest and best” nonsense until I found out Irenaeus, One of the earliest church fathers (second century) quoted a verse that doesn’t exist in the “oldest and best” Codex Sinaiticus. Acts 8:37. Against Heresies book 3 chapter 12 section 8. It does exist in the TR.

[@BillAmanda-e1o]

Moore Karen Brown Kevin Lewis Scott

[@Hopamptube]

{Those who follow the Messenger, the unlettered prophet, whom they find written in what they have of the Torah and the Gospel, who enjoins upon them what is right and forbids them what is wrong and makes lawful for them the good things and prohibits for them the evil and relieves them of their burden and the shackles which were upon them. So they who have believed in him, honored him, supported him and followed the light which was sent down with him - it is those who will be the successful.}Quran, Alaraf :157

[@busterbiloxi3833]

Ehab? Thar she blows!

[@BattleSymphony349]

As always Christianity proven and tested No corruption of revelation!

[@DYORTV]

εις χιρα

[@allencushmen8352]

Hehehe 😁 We came from Britain to see if we could steal some more old manuscript 's. Hehehe!!!! 😊

[@Hopamptube]

And they say: "The Most Beneficent (Allah) has begotten a son (or children)." Glory to Him! They [those whom they call children of Allah i.e. the angels, 'Iesa (Jesus) son of Maryam (Mary), 'Uzair (Ezra), etc.], are but honoured slaves. Quran:Alanbia 26

[@alexisbonilla5942]

Sir, Islam and true Christianity are not compatible as they contradict each other. God’s true name is not “Allah”, and all of His prophets are Israelites, not Arabs.

[@Hopamptube]

@@alexisbonilla5942 Allah similar to "Eli" in Aramaic language which means God. The first sin that was committed by Satan before he descended to earth was pride. This is the sin that led Satan to his eternal destiny, because he thought he is better than human This is a sin that God is not taking lightly, and the greatest trait that prevent wrongdoers from knowing the truth. (Verily, you will find the strongest among men in enmity to the believers (Muslims) the Jews and those who are Al-Mushrikun (see V. 2:105), and you will find the nearest in love to the believers (Muslims) those who say: "We are Christians." That is because amongst them are priests and monks, and they are not proud) Quran 5:82

[@alexisbonilla5942]

@@Hopamptube never has God asked to be referred to as ”Allah” in his Scriptures. He is very specific and we can’t just make up names as we want.

[@Hopamptube]

@@alexisbonilla5942 according to your logic "God" is a made up name, since it was'nt mentioned in original language Hebrew and Aramaic languages. :) Take it easy man, Allah loves the humbles

[@alexisbonilla5942]

@@Hopamptube “God” is a generic term, not a specific name. It is used to describe the highest power in the Spiritual, Military and Economic aspects - there is no one greater. Man’s duty is to find out who He really is and how He wants to be addressed. That’s why there is so much confusion in the world - everyone wants to believe in their own opinion as truth.

[@johnnycee5179]

It was found in the trash and considered a flawed document.

[@ChrisPattas]

Peter never had a gospel because he was illiterate like all the apostles. They did not speak Greek. That’s why all gospels were written later by Greek speaking apologists. The gospel writers all spoke high end Greek. Paul wrote the first letters before the gospels and never mentions Jesus burial and empty tomb. Don’t you think it would have been something to talk about by the guy who authored a third of the NT? The gospels were written decades later based on oral tradition and that’s why they contradict each other on specific events. The church fathers also banned certain gospel versions as heretical that didn’t suit the theology at the time such as Gospel of Thomas. The NT stories were hand picked to tell a specific story to convert mostly a gentile audience after the fall of Jerusalem in 70 AD and after James the brother of Jesus who Paul met was executed.

[@koinegreekbible]

Your claims totally lack historical foundation and go against uncontested facts. It is not worth correcting you, because you don't want facts - but they are all out there and easy to find.

[@ChrisPattas]

* Mark’s Gospel originally ended at verse 16:8 with the young man telling the women that Jesus was risen and they fled in terror, telling no one. If they told no one, how do we know this? * The ‘Long Ending’ (verses 16:9-20) was added to Mark’s Gospel long afterwards and was therefore entirely unknown to the author of Mark. No matter how similar it is the the ending of Luke’s Gospel, it can not be relied on as true. * Because Mark provided no guidance to the other gospel authors, they had to guess what probably happened next. Matthew has Jesus meet the disciples at a mountain in Galilee and tell them to go to all nations to preach the gospel. Luke has the disciples stay in Jerusalem, where Jesus met them at a meal in an upper room, after which he leads them out on the road to Bethany, where he is taken up bodily to heaven on the evening of his resurrection. The story in John’s Gospel is an elaboration of that in Luke and specifically has Jesus meet the disciples three times: twice in the upper room and once by the Sea of Galilee.

[@ChrisPattas]

* The two accounts of the virgin birth, in Matthew and Luke, are too different for either one to be true. In Matthew’s Gospel, an angel tells Joseph in a dream, but in Luke’s Gospel, an angel actually appears to Mary and tells her about what will happen. In one gospel, Joseph does not know about Mary’s encounter and, in the other, Mary does not know about Joseph’s dream. * The nativity accounts in Matthew and Luke are too different for either one to be true. Matthew’s Gospel contains an improbable account of a star leading the wise men to the very house where Jesus lay, an otherwise unattested ‘Slaughter of the Innocents’ and a flight to Egypt that transparently creates parallels between Jesus and Moses. Luke’s Gospel contains an improbable account of a census, known to have taken place ten years after the death of King Herod, causing Joseph to take his heavily pregnant wife on the arduous and dangerous journey to Bethlehem, where Jesus was born, and unfalsifiable stories of Simeon and Anna recognising Jesus as the future Messiah. * The story of John the Baptist preparing the way for Jesus is based too much on the Old Testament to be true. The story of his execution soon afterwards at a party in Galilee is certainly untrue, as the wedding of Herod Antipas and Herodias did not take place until 34 CE, and John was executed in 35 or early 36 CE at a remote fortress called Macherus, to the east of the Dead Sea. * In Mark 1:13, the story of Jesus going into the wilderness, where he is ministered by angels is an allusion to Elijah (1 Kings 19:5-7) who was ministered by an angel and in the wilderness forty days. There is no actual suggestion that Jesus fasted for this time, but those familiar with the story of Elijah are likely to have assumed he did do so, and this would be made explicit in Matthew and Luke. This brings into play another allusion, to Moses when (Exodus 34:28) he fasted for 40 days while he wrote the words of the Ten Commandments on tablets. In Matthew and Luke, the temptations by Satan are elaborations on Mark’s account and were apparently copied from the hypothetical ‘Q’ document.

[@koinegreekbible]

@@ChrisPattas How you can possibly know, nearly 2,000 years later, what "the other gospel authors ... had to guess" is a mystery. This is yet another unsubstantiated claim. After Christ's resurrection he did indeed meet the disciples and other followers in Jerusalem on various occasions, but in the nearly 50 days between his resurrection and his ascension, they also travelled to their home region of Galilee, where he also appeared to them. 1 Corinthians 15 briefly reports numerous other meetings between Jesus and a large number of people, in once instance "over 500 people at once." (1 Cor 15:6) Such multiple appearances are no surprise and indeed provide further independent evidence of his resurrection. Of course he met different people in different places. These are not "contradictions".

[@koinegreekbible]

@@ChrisPattas Well, you are definitely an expert in "unfalsifiable stories"!

[@aggabus]

Sinai in Saudi Arabia

[@Ananias17]

Based on what evidence?

[@alanx4121]

see "Is the World's Oldest Bible a Fake?"

[@postmcdonald5353]

Powerful scripts were left out ...

[@Hopamptube]

2 complete books were dropped from codex of sinaiticus: "The Shepherd of Hermas", a heavily allegorical work full of visions and parables and "The Epistle of Barnabas" which contains text about the Jews as the killers of Christ, denial of christ devinity, denial of Trinity and a prophecy about coming prophet named Muhammed (these books found 200 years before the coming of prophet Muhammed) Yes, these are the facts they hide from you for all these centuries.

[@spazomaz]

Lol why are you lying you pagan 😂😂😂 you can read the books online it doesn't say anything you mentioned

[@spazomaz]

In parable 5, the author mentions a Son of God, as a virtuous man filled with a holy "pre-existent spirit" and adopted as the Son.

[@nikkiratledge]

Problem with your proposal is that it's more likely than not the Sinaiticus was written in the 19th century, along with the Codex Vaticanus . It is true that both the other works were included with the Sinaiticus and since they were an integral part of the manuscript, and were admittedly written in the 19th century, it tends to follow logically that so were the Sinaiticus manuscripts .

[@alanx4121]

"Is the World's Oldest Bible a Fake?"

[@bodexkinjo2825]

Monastery it's catholic there is no connection from SDA point of view because Ellen white and company started the adventism.

[@Ananias17]

This monastery is actually orthodox Christian not Roman Catholic

[@gdblackthorn4137]

The Sinaiticus; phony book full of corrupt verses and missing text! The foundation of all the latest so-called Bible translations! It changes the doctrine of Christ and perverts the word of God! Rev 22:18 For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book: Rev 22:19 And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book. Rev 22:20 He which testifieth these things saith, Surely I come quickly. Amen. Even so, come, Lord Jesus.

[@salman13]

the first christians did not have John mark Luke and paul and what not. they had what the bible itself refers to. it says Jesu was preaching the gospel himself. he didn't have what is known as the nt. these people wre hunted down and killed though.

[@RUFUS777]

That is NOT Mt.Sinai/Horub..

[@cosmodookie2914]

Ich glaub Vater Gandalf hat nen neuen Hut..

[@christopherskipp1525]

This is probably not Mt. Sinai/Horeb. There is a much better candidate for the actual mountain that Moses asended in Saudi Arabia, but obviously opinion on this is divided.

[@user-om3cv9en5j]

The Quran is true, it states that Jesus (peace be upon him) was not crucified but was rather saved by Allah (God), truth hurts

[@JohnThreeSixteen918]

The Roman Emperor Tacitus and the Jewish historian, Josephus (both of whom were NOT Christians) wrote historical accounts of Jesus' crucifixion hundreds of years before the Quaran was published. Their credible historical writings corroborate the reality of Jesus' crucifixion. The Apostle Paul states in the New Testament of the Bible that to some the cross is foolishness, but to us (Christians) it is the power unto salvation.

[@AthanSMaliakkal]

So Allah lied. God cannot lie. So ya Allah is not God. Truth hurts. Ave Christus Rex. Allah failed his promise 😂😂😆😆

[@TheCrucifixFishTestifies]

God memorialized the crucifixion and resurrection on day five of creation. He placed the entire crucifixion scene into the skull bone of a fish. The crucifix fish is quite profound and extraordinary evidence proving the crucifixion and resurrection happened. Skull is the name of the location where the crucifixion happened, and fish is the symbol of the New Covenant faith.

[@channelone3773G]

Codex sinaiticus doesn't have John 3 :16...

[@sanskritprayers]

... I just checked and unless I did something wrong in the online Codex, it appears you are mistaken

[@koinegreekbible]

Oh yes it does!

[@chessboxer35]

Its fake

[@Hopamptube]

Jesus answered: 'The name of the Messiah is admirable, for God himself gave him the name when he had created his soul, and placed it in a celestial splendour. God said: 'Wait Mohammed; for thy sake I will to create paradise, the world, and a great multitude of creatures, whereof I make thee a present, insomuch that whoso shall bless thee shall be blessed, and whoso shall curse thee shall be accursed. When I shall send thee into the world I shall send thee as my messenger of salvation, and thy word shall be true, insomuch that heaven and earth shall fail, but thy faith shall never fail." Mohammed is his blessed name.' Book of Barnabas 97:9-10

[@Jin-dc7gl]

The book of Barnabas is rejected by Christians who consider it a forgery.

[@Hopamptube]

@@Jin-dc7gl good u move to another vector, so what is the basis for classification, how were other books classified? For example any authentication methodology ?

[@JamesRichardWiley]

Wikipedia: "Codex Sinaiticus is a fourth century Christian manuscript of a Greek Bible, containing the majority of the Greek Old Testament, including the Apocrypha along with the deuterocanonical books, and the Greek New Testament, with both the Epistle of Barnabas and the Shepherd of Hermas included." How is this collection of human writing any different from every other man made book? It is made by Christians for Christians.

[@fbcl8532]

There is so much deception involved in this video. The place is NOT Mt. Sinai or Horeb. There is NO archeological evidence to prove it is Mt. Sinai. The Codex Sinaiticus is a counterfeit copy of the scriptures.

[@jeetime9436]

That’s not the oldest. The translation in the film was pushed by one of the early church apostates, his name was Origen. He was from Alexandria around 100 ad.. The texts from Egypt were altered by Oregon and men like him. The pure texts are complete with the chapters after Mark 8 and have archeological proof with artifacts as an early as 50 ad. So this video is disingenuous.

[@koinegreekbible]

I'm afraid you have got your facts all muddled up at every point.

[@jeetime9436]

@@koinegreekbible The facts are correct in a relative time range but can appreciate the requirement to be very specific and should have been. (Origen 185ad one of first known teachers with apostate writings), The fragment from 50ad is a recent find and will find the reference. The next academic accepted New Testament fragment the Book of John dated at 125ad, both are from the Textus Receptus which comprise over 98% of Ancient New Testament material found in the correct geographic areas. The Alexandrian Text referenced in the video is full of inaccuracies and missing whole passages of scripture. The Alexandrian Text is traced to Egypt and found with mystic, agnostic, and other apostate writings. But appreciate the requirement to be more exact with info with links in the future. But the video is still wrong and misleading.

[@itsme.4285]

There is no consistency between what was written in the Codex Sinaiticus n the modern Bible. Example: Mark 1:1 in the modern Bible tells: " The beginning of the gospel of Jesus Christ, the Son of God." Mark 1:1 in Codex Sinaiticus tells: The beginning of the Gospel of Jesus Christ. There is no : son of God in the Codex Sinaiticus for Mark 1:1..

[@gsgidney]

This is all wrong. Simonedes wrote Siniaticus for his uncle Benedict. Simonedes was a prodigy. Side note, St Catherine's isnt even the real Mt Sinai. Scripture says its "in Arabia". However, this video is definitely in line with the changes the catholic organization has continued to make to history.

[@matthewott6003]

I don't see how an ancient manuscript could just be e hidden for so many years in a monstery. It just makes no sense. Nobody went through any of these ancient codexes until then?

[@koinegreekbible]

I suggest that you read D.C.Parker's "Codex Sinaiticus", published by the British Library and others. It will help you to understand how this happened.

[@danob2904]

WHAT A CROCK...

[@kkwok9]

Lol

[@theapocalypticgospel]

The trash can manuscript attacking the divinity of Jesus

[@bobbymichaels2]

It's a fake.

[@TEDAdventist]

It is very easy to make such a claim - but much better to do the research and listen to the experts in their field. Your comment does not really help - especially when this is well authenticated and has seriously helped our understanding and reliability of scripture.

[@yagami1918]

Cmon atleast present your supporting statement, dont make fun of yoyrself

[@matthewherzel264]

@@TEDAdventist look guys, when you create narratives that avoid telling the messy truth about history it opens the doors to these kinds of wild conspiracy claims. We can’t expect honesty and nuance from people when we systematically spread misinformation and squash historical nuance as apologists regularly do about the Bible… If you say “these documents are 100% trustworthy” when there are obvious historical complications, then people will be more likely to view the whole thing with skepticism when they see that you are not being… hmm… 100% trustworthy. It’s almost as if someone has been teaching people to think in absolute or black and white terms, when reality is far more complicated. Wherever could people get that kind of thinking I wonder? Do better.

[@Sam-fp8zm]

Dan wallace says no its not and because of something to do with the material it was made of it would of cost millions to fake.

[@charity2275]

@@TEDAdventist You should consider the EVIDENCE provided by Dr. David Daniels, proving the Codex Sinaiticus was written in the 1800s, and is NOT ancient. Tischendorf LIED a lot about his experience. And how can you burn parchment which is animal skin? The so-called EXPERTS in this documentary are not credible. The fact is, modern Bibles are NOT trustworthy - they have had THOUSANDS of words removed, changed, or added to affect 356 Christian doctrines, and have added Catholic and Occultic phrases. Adventists (and I am one) should trust the KING JAMES over any modern Bible.

[@cowboywayne8271]

Mt Sinai is not in Egypt and if yall were true bible researchers yall would know that the true Mt Sinai is across the red sea like the Bible says in Saudi or Iraq

[@koinegreekbible]

Well, which is it then? "Saudi" or Iraq?

[@Tony.the.Baptist]

Amazing how they never mentioned Constantine Simonides and how they came into possession of the Sinaiticus. This manuscript was being written in 1840 Athos by Constantine Simonides and he even had a witness testify to that fact named Kallinikos Hieromonachos. Why not tell everyone how Tischendorf had a meeting with Pope Gregory the 16th one year prior to going to St Catherine's monastery? Strange that a Protestant would get such an audience with the Pope and his Cardinals. Oh yeah, he had a reference letters. Why would monks be burning 4th century manuscripts? Makes no sense. There are only two options, either monks were burning 4th century manuscripts or parts of those manuscripts were burnt intentionally because those pages proved Constantine Simonides did write them. There's no getting out of the fact that some of those manuscripts are burned, the real question is who did it and why? Thanks to this corrupt manuscript and the Vaticanus which was clearly written by a 15th century scribe we have Jehovah's witnesses. The truth is the Catholic Church couldn't burn Bibles faster than they were printing them out so they chose a different tactic and that was to confuse everyone which is why we have hundreds of different Bible translations rather than just the KJV which came from the Textus receptus which literally means "Received Text". Galatians 1:9 King James Version 9 As we said before, so say I now again, if any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed.

[@koinegreekbible]

Sorry, Tony, but you are repeating a conspiracy theory that was disproved years ago. I suggest you read "Codex Sinaiticus and the Simonides Affair" by J.K. Elliott.

[@DM-bb3wl]

Something smells like actors

[@Hopamptube]

The text to predict the coming of prophet Muhammed written centuries before the coming of Muhammed ! So your starting point should be (When this really was written!) Tip: dont believe the deceiving liars who try to hide the words for hundreds of years by force by horror by killing by burning (Indeed, they who conceal what Allah has sent down of the Book and exchange it for a small price - those consume not into their bellies except the Fire. And Allah will not speak to them on the Day of Resurrection, nor will He purify them. And they will have a painful punishment.) Quran, Albaqara 174

[@Sharon-yk7xm]

The catholic stole the book like they always have

[@paultrosclair1775]

Sinaticus is a fake. Use textus receptus..

[@gsgidney]

It's funny because, this isn't Mt Sinai 😂😂😂

[@sriramkumar9577]

Monastery, used as a place of meditation 🧘‍♀️? Where did you learn meditation from? From Buddha? Is there any verses in your holy book about the importance of meditation? JESUS IS A JEW ✡, HE NEVER KNEW CHRISTIANITY. Stop fooling Us from centuries.

[@EstherSHELTON-c5x]

Read psalm 4: 4. It does say meditate.

[@rwbirchdecoys]

Goes to show you humans have been making science fiction for ages. This old man has apparently wasted his life and needs to find a razor.

[@LAFITZ10]

all this & we STILL have men worshipping PERISHABLE bread out of ovens as flesh that is SIN instead of worshipping "GOD Of Spirit Who Must Be Worshipped In Spirit & Truth" - John 4:24 is simply IGNORED by Catholics??? as they worship flesh w/lies ? when Jesus IS Imperishable Living Bread Out Of Heaven. may we repent of the lies that worship satan/sin in flesh instead of worship Jesus God Of SPIRIT Amen

[@busterbiloxi3833]

Mount SINE-E-I?