A video about the first big aviation claim of China - ARJ21 airliner: kzbin.info/www/bejne/bofJY2Wto85ph6M
@cychin19442 жыл бұрын
As an old student of aerodynamics ( 1966 ) in Canada and involved in man power flight I take off my hat to the team in developing the plane from scratch It is a wonderful effort Congratulations Malaysia
@mofayer2 жыл бұрын
😅, it wasn't developed from scratch, it is stolen tech from Boeing and others, there are ongoing litigations.
@jonseilim43212 жыл бұрын
Wow a real veteran!
@abyyy4902 жыл бұрын
@@mofayer stolen my ass. Whats your source: trust me broo??
@baomao72432 жыл бұрын
@@abyyy490 “From scratch” would be to ignore (legal) cloning of the existing platforms.
@lopesh.44312 жыл бұрын
@@baomao7243 What are you talking about?
@hdaviator91812 жыл бұрын
The 919 is China's A300. It won't change the world, but will lay the ground work for more competitive designs in the future.
@haroldomiyaura9122 жыл бұрын
I thought the same. 😃
@baomao72432 жыл бұрын
Disruption always starts from below…
@javiertorres47032 жыл бұрын
Geo political issues come into existence. A neo colony of the United States will tend to buy from the US and not China or other non western powers.
@johntse86552 жыл бұрын
no need to change the world, just change china is enough, after that, as long as its market is protected, thanks to western sanctions, its descendants can grow and conquer the world later
@allowedme2 жыл бұрын
HDaviator Did or has A300 changed the world?
@baasheep41882 жыл бұрын
Thank for full documentation of C919 , hope I could try sitting aboard a new C919
@freeworld888882 жыл бұрын
people have money should buy comac shares, it is just going up and up. C919 is a game changer in china. It is the second break through after the troublesome of AR21 region jet. So the chinese are very proud.
@StephenKarl_Integral2 жыл бұрын
It's a game changer only if it is at least 15-20% cheaper than A320. The fuel saving doesn't stand out despite LEAP powered. Unless Comac make the plane much lighter, the aircraft in its current state is only interesting for poor airlines that only want to maintain routes and flights. Also, unless we have another Covid-like disaster, or a war on a larger scale than Ukraine, I don't think western countries will struggle enough to think of buying cheaper aircraft than Airbus/Boeing.
@FiveTwoSevenTHR2 жыл бұрын
Wumao spotted
@thisiskevin10006 ай бұрын
Not yet listed on both mainland and Hong Kong bourses
@drunkqi80196 ай бұрын
@@thisiskevin1000you can buy avid xi’an(中航西飞)instead, which is in charge of the production of the fuselage and flaps. It has been listed on mainland bourses already
@yaoyichenvictoriasch70145 ай бұрын
@@thisiskevin1000 COMAC is a State-owned Enterprise, so there are no shares, and the stock market is kinda useless in China
@Niskan402 жыл бұрын
7:14 funny, that is my model in Blender 3D I was working on at some point. Cool to see it here :)
@jbu9992 жыл бұрын
It’s a good day when Sky shows up in my KZbin feed
@marethmok56352 жыл бұрын
Congratulations to Chinese efforts for this world aircraft Industry I wish that Chinese aircraft scientists and Technologists get fully success In Science and Technology 💐💪
@kevinheard83642 жыл бұрын
THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR RETURNING to do these videos. You really "are" Skyships. So glad you're back. Happy holidays
@andyhu95422 жыл бұрын
I want to clarify something. Hongdu is NOT a place, it's a factory. The video sounds like it's a city like Shanghai, but the actual name for the city is Nanchang. I know it because I'm from that city and typing this comment literally kilometres from the proposed manufacturing plant. Hongdu is kind of a nickname given to the city because of its long history of flooding. (The word 'Hongdu' literally translates to 'flood city' or 'flood capital') It's a strange thing to be proud of constant flooding, but we do name factories here 'Hongdu' something factory, like the plane factory in this video. This is the factory that produced the first jet fighter for the PLA Air Force. But it got overtaken in the defense sector by factories in Chengdu and Shenyang. Now it's pivoting towards commercial jets by taking up the C919.
@SafepathUS2 жыл бұрын
Xiexie, thanks friend for helping us learn. Im always happy to learn. 👍 Aviation is always ongoing learning, safety improvements, innovations and modernization and I'm sure that your awareness is helping everyone learn. Sharing experiences & abilities saves time and safer practices for others. Many thanks. My renewed passport is ready to go to China 🇨🇳 and share business with others 👍 In short words, many of us recent years, can't believe our eyes, and learning how our greedy Western corporations are treating people as "Sheeple", forcing people into less quality habits. We really need to improve. Learning a few more languages is only only normal for some countries nearby borders, and part of our promoting better understanding qualities to help others whenever possible. Good Luck To Everyone 👍
@fdjw882 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the clarification.
@sidewinder34222 жыл бұрын
Additiona info Hongdu specializes in Trainer aircraft like the JL-15.
@chongyenlee71832 жыл бұрын
Òòppp00
@andyhu95422 жыл бұрын
@@sidewinder3422 Didn't know that! I thought they went silent for years and popped up producing C919s. That explains a lot to me.
@PSR_Macky2 жыл бұрын
Very well done Documentary, very informative and great presentation ... thanks for your efforts to sharing this to the community!
@jsvno2 жыл бұрын
You are doing a crisp and very understandable analyze or this.. . Best regards from a retired B707 jokey...
@khankhaaaan2 жыл бұрын
This surely is a mammoth achievement considering not much aviation history as a country and the many competition killing sanctions and tactics from the industry bullies. Congratulations!
@大贝壳森林蚂蚁3 ай бұрын
The United States? The United States has acquired almost all European companies.
@ZedM-t9x2 жыл бұрын
Thank you! As a Shanghainese, we see the plane growing up day after days. Admittedly, there are delays in this project and meet a lot of delays. Financially, as you introduced in the video, the listing price is really quiet higher than stated. Arliners now can get discounts from both A and B quiet alot these days so the price for A, B and C now are roughly the same. But we still hope for the best for the C919 project and it really is much more sophiscated and well-thought than other chinese designed products
@oneviwatara93842 жыл бұрын
Western engine is the main problem hence the west could easily stop selling the engine to China whenever they wanted.
@ZedM-t9x2 жыл бұрын
@@oneviwatara9384 yes that's right. It will face the similar situation as the Russians nowadays if the gov ditch the current balance
@karlossargeant38722 жыл бұрын
Yup China catching up with Airbus and Boeing with Comac C919's and later CR929's in the upcoming years too So alot is going too happen in the upcoming years Awesome Video!!!!
@JDAbelRN2 жыл бұрын
It will fly in China and Africa, big deal. Boeing and Airbus barely keep up with orders that have now.
@JDAbelRN2 жыл бұрын
Not EVEN CLOSE 🇨🇳😂🤣
@oadka2 жыл бұрын
so happy to hear his voice again!
@slypear2 жыл бұрын
Excellent presentation, as usual, thank you! As I started watching, I had been wondering if you'd address the so many the aspects of this project I was curious about. And sure enough you did, one by one, as I watched on. This machine will be a game changer, for sure.
@brettdemauna99942 жыл бұрын
Garbage Trash. You wouldn't see it in western colors, only be it Africa or Asia maybe.
@JDAbelRN2 жыл бұрын
Chinkycopycats
@fadelj12 жыл бұрын
another example of stolen technology from the West and geared largely with Western components
@JDAbelRN2 жыл бұрын
@@fadelj1 absolutely, positively, technology theft. Almost seems USA has no clue and poor prevention of this theft. Or traitors.
@kamsingchoo43322 жыл бұрын
@@JDAbelRN chunkybuffoneries!
@flyingdentist2 жыл бұрын
hello sky,aviator here.Great video about this brand new jet
@daveroche65222 жыл бұрын
Thank you Skyships - another very good one. Betcha neither of the THE OTHER [Big] TWO (manufacturers) are feeling 100% comfortable right now (never mind the ongoing "issues" each has). I'm disregarding Sukoi for the moment - just for now - what with (their) separate 'issues'....
@penskepc23742 жыл бұрын
I doubt they're that worried anywhere besides the third world market. Westerners don't even trust Chinese cars, no major airline is inking a deal for one of these.
@donaldli18642 жыл бұрын
Very good video, my thumbs up!
@johnwhoo61942 жыл бұрын
Excellent, very detailed, informative, and balanced!
@Southwest_923WR2 жыл бұрын
As well as obviously doing your homework on the aircraft and Chinas manufacturing, I have to give a "shout out" for pronouncing the Chinese NAMES! Damn, bro you speak it FLUENTLY! I get "tongue tided" just listening to their language! Another great video with great info. Keep up the good work, Bro!👍🏿
@zhoubaidinh4032 жыл бұрын
How's China gonna handle the Chip Act, US defacto declaration of WAR!
@supericeman12 жыл бұрын
lol I'm Chinese, and his pronunciation of most of the Chinese cities are all wrong lol, not here to critique his Chinese but excellent video I really enjoyed it!
@HekateMGO2 жыл бұрын
@@zhoubaidinh403They can’t, they don’t have the means. China should look inward before concerning itself with any of that anyway. It’s own citizens are declaring war against its totalitarian government and Ponzi scheme economy.
@brettdemauna99942 жыл бұрын
It won't be a game changer, par with older airbus ceo & boeing ng probably 10+ years will finally up against neo & max.
@didyoumissedmegobareatersk22042 жыл бұрын
@@zhoubaidinh403 😂it will he like space station type of race just wait and watch chinese are patience and Briany enough to get over it
@mohammadasifrao41902 жыл бұрын
well good to see new company making a planes now good luck
@papavictorromeo50792 жыл бұрын
Thank you for another great video,
@SkyshipsEng2 жыл бұрын
Thank you for watching
@Mocha_1222 жыл бұрын
Funny to see people complaining it's made in China that it is bad when you have Airbus aircraft production also made in China
@sydyidanton58732 жыл бұрын
That is most likely where Comac ‘acquired’ much of their design material, it looks very much like a knock-off A320.
@laosasean84822 жыл бұрын
@@sydyidanton5873 Because its having and wheel so its knock off airbus, so you expect China built airplane without wing then and how can it take off and fly.
@bunyavissuthisorn59092 жыл бұрын
Made-in-China Airbus is totally "Airbus" standards. Made-in-Indonesia BMW is totally "Deutsche" standards. .........
@hirokokueh3541 Жыл бұрын
@@sydyidanton5873 the shape is more similar to 737 tho, it even has the flat bottom engine
@kennedy66185 ай бұрын
@@sydyidanton5873Can a policeman arrest you and lock you up in jail because you look like the guy who robbed the bank! 😂 Dumb comment!
@MrRussor Жыл бұрын
Hoo boy the 50-cent army are having a field day in here.
@JKuaresma2 жыл бұрын
Excellent, as usual!
@jonseilim43212 жыл бұрын
Hope one day to see this here in Southeast Asia! What a beautiful aircraft
@JDAbelRN2 жыл бұрын
China copycats🇨🇳🤣😂
@bunyavissuthisorn59092 жыл бұрын
First flight is on 2017, 2012 for 2018 Wikipedia. Number built is just 10as of Dec,21 2022. Is it poor future? .........
@accountantthe33942 жыл бұрын
@@bunyavissuthisorn5909 lol that's numbers "built", not ordered 🤣 Safety certification completed nov. last year, mass production due to begin soon. Jealous?
@bunyavissuthisorn59092 жыл бұрын
@@accountantthe3394 Not jealousy, I just feel pity to people who admire Chinese products. Ok. It is number built, how about "order number" when compare with those of Boeing, began assembly line in late 1960s. .....
@jjjhhh45712 жыл бұрын
@@bunyavissuthisorn5909 Thai products must be better, hope Thai airplane can beat Boeing in the next couple year!
@yzhang2008 Жыл бұрын
Besides the C919, this video itself is an achievement! Good job!
@iyawesome9863 Жыл бұрын
The best C919 documentary
@rainerdittrich21942 жыл бұрын
At least, China developed a very nice looking aircraft! Good luck for that!
@burntnougat53412 жыл бұрын
Kinda looks like a C series clone
@gregb15992 жыл бұрын
And most of it was copied from the west lol
@longbeach76232 жыл бұрын
Developed? 🤣🤣
@didyoumissedmegobareatersk22042 жыл бұрын
@@gregb1599 Yoy look like a copy pf every human being out there how tf u havd nose eyes and head
@muhammadaslamtariq80352 жыл бұрын
Lovely presentation. Very good introduction of C919, keep it up
@hcjet2 жыл бұрын
thanks for great work!
@nathanielcallender22 жыл бұрын
It's a good 👍 looking aircraft
@JDAbelRN2 жыл бұрын
Good looking doesn't equal safe...few westerners would set foot on one
@kittytrail9 ай бұрын
@@JDAbelRN nah, there's probably at least 80% of "western" parts and technologies in it so it's at least 80% safe... 😼👌
@AaronShenghao2 жыл бұрын
Chinese can build planes, no doubt about it. But can it be a competitive one? Yet to see. Many in the comment says “oh I won’t step on one” I would have the same mindset, but then 737 MAX reminded us, a good reputation doesn’t mean their planes is fool proof. Any competition is good competition. Boeing…fallen from grace just because they don’t have competition. While Airbus they are bossy enough to cancel Qatar’s order because defects they deemed not “an safety issue”. A 3rd option can force and remind the other two to watch out.
@randomscb-40charger782 жыл бұрын
I don't know, after hearing about the range issue, I'm worried this might just end up being another Dassault Mercure, essentially a French 737-200 with less range.
@EmmaNguyen-mg5xq2 жыл бұрын
@@randomscb-40charger78 china is not france
@randomscb-40charger782 жыл бұрын
@@EmmaNguyen-mg5xq I said the Dassault Mercure *was* essentially a French 737-200.
@oadka2 жыл бұрын
@@randomscb-40charger78 they already have 600 orders. Iran is also a very big market for aviation. Due to sanctions they are unable to get any aircraft whatsoever. They are desparate for any new aeroplanes so they will buy it for sure. Africa is also a large potential market. No way this project can fail.
@edwardwood65322 жыл бұрын
I do agree, a third option to Airbus and Boeing would give some competition would be better internationally.
@A_Nice_Guy.2 жыл бұрын
Love the C919, hope you can cover the CR929 someday
@SkyshipsEng2 жыл бұрын
That will be interesting
@ProCelestialEmpire2 жыл бұрын
It's said to be no R now
@JDAbelRN2 жыл бұрын
In thirty years....😂😉🤣🇨🇳☢️
@YouCCP22 жыл бұрын
@@JDAbelRN ,Correct, Boeing will be out of the commercial plane business in the next 30 years.
@mofayer2 жыл бұрын
@@YouCCP2 yep, all Boeing tech will be stolen by then.
@tsegayegirma7812 Жыл бұрын
Excellent presentation.
@atatexan2 жыл бұрын
Excellent, comprehensive video. One correction. I was an officer at International Aero Engines AG in the late 1980’s to mid-1990’s. We were developing the MD90 with McDonnell Douglas. “China Trunkliner” was in its early stages. This was a Shanghai Aircraft produced MD$82 for the domestic market. As the MD90 took shape, China wanted to also produce the MD90. Catic insisted on coproduction of the IAE V2500-D5 in China. In other words they wanted to steal the engine design secrets. IAE and our five nation partner governments wisely refused. The MD90 co-production aircraft never happened.
@xsu-is7vq2 жыл бұрын
Actually 2 MD90 were produced in China. The program was then cancelled by Boeing after it took over MD.
@wsktan12 жыл бұрын
Great video. Very informative and objectively fair.
@rsun22262 жыл бұрын
Looks beautiful :)
@tsunholeoyum85552 жыл бұрын
Good luck C919.
@joaquin33962 жыл бұрын
Great video!! Your speech has really improved since your first videos. You sound like a native English speaker now.
Does anyone know how does the price compare with boeing 737 for a large order like from Ryanair for over 100 planes ? Wiki sayes list price $112 million, so Ryanair would expect them for half price $56 million with a large order. Will the COMAC be able to compete with a discounted $56m 737 max 900 ER.
@bunyavissuthisorn59092 жыл бұрын
May be, COMAC renders half price with the half safety. This country is keen on budget goods. ............
@imnewlight11 ай бұрын
@@bunyavissuthisorn5909the price is actually quite similar and the safety is the same
@stalag142 жыл бұрын
Welcome back Sky.
@stephenc69552 жыл бұрын
The C919 is a good start. It's somewhat sub-par in terms of aerodynamics, materials and weight saving, but all that will come in time. The rest of the plane is like Boeing and Airbus 31:43 pick a supplier.
@christoohunders531611 ай бұрын
great presentation
@mathewmathew08 Жыл бұрын
This video is the best, well informed info about C919.
@craigslistseller93542 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the thorough explanation!!! Wishing COMAC success with the C919 & Beyond!!! 🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫
@kevinrusch36272 жыл бұрын
What are the multi-year operating costs? If the acquisition and operating costs are low enough, you could base an entire airline in Denver and reach the entire lower 48 with it.
@Nafeels2 жыл бұрын
Finally, a great cover for a medium haul competitor! It’s rather surprising that COMAC didn’t even consider making a B767/A300 type widebody for mainland flights. It would definitely sell like hotcakes to Asian markets which currently utilize big widebodies at about half capacity for domestic routes. Low cost carriers in SEA region like Cebu Air, Vietjet, and Air Asia wouldn’t say no for a cheap brand new widebody that would save them more money in the long run.
@ex0duzz2 жыл бұрын
That's what CR929 is, no?
@Nafeels2 жыл бұрын
@@ex0duzz The CR929 is slated to be a competitor to the B787/A330, which currently is too big for the medium haul routes predicted to take off (no pun intended) in the coming years as point-to-point travel becomes more commonplace.
@DontUputThatEvilOnMe2 жыл бұрын
Well it took them 10 years to build this aircraft. You are asking too much.
@Nafeels2 жыл бұрын
@@DontUputThatEvilOnMe Maybe I do, but so does Chinese carriers. China pulled out from the CRAIC joint venture for obvious reasons, which severely crippled their future plans. Boeing also publicly said that they’ll be cancelling any plans for B797/NMA project as the tech to do it sustainably wasn’t there yet, while Airbus seemed to push their luck with the A321XLR. If anything, it’d be a miracle if the C929 even be materialized within this decade.
@DontUputThatEvilOnMe2 жыл бұрын
@@Nafeels didn’t know China pulled out of CRAIC. But I have seen talk about Boeing cancelling their NMA is a strategic lie. This is because their new CEO has done things like this in the past and it would be to Boeing’s advantage if Airbus is unaware of the new program. But only time will tell.
@poconosgiant32552 жыл бұрын
amazing
@binghaozou Жыл бұрын
The first step is the hardest.
@EveryThing-se5yj Жыл бұрын
Mashaallah (Comgratulations)
@axvarela2 жыл бұрын
Just like an early 90s A320.
@brainthesizeofplanet2 жыл бұрын
Lol, competing with the "MAX technology" is simple, all the plane has to do is fly, not crash....
@aboutraore67542 жыл бұрын
Boeing is doing a shity job with the no crash part though
I am not an aviation expert, but the fundamentals of the new Chinese airliner seem noticeably better than the Boeing 737. Which was developed way back in the 1960s. The COMAC C919 does not come across like a copy, but an improved version of the 737. Maybe it's more like the Airbus A320? I really took notice of the added ground clearance, higher wings and better placement of the engines!.. Time will tell, but I like the starting point.
@JB-nt5lu2 жыл бұрын
But thg e A320 SUCKS.
@gelinrefira2 жыл бұрын
Well, it has two wings, a T-tail, 2 engine so obviously according to westerners, it is a copy stolen from Boeing.
@harleyearl32892 жыл бұрын
@@JB-nt5lu Both the A320 and the C919 have better fundamentals than the ancient 737 airframe with its shoehorned new engines screwing up the plane's balance and aerodynamics. Then there is the disturbing amount of wing flex, and fuel leaking out during takeoff??? Watch... "Fiji Airways 737 MAX 8 Takeoff from Wellington with Lots of Wing Flex and Wingtip Vortices" It's better for the Chinese to go their own way as much as they can. Keeping it classy. Beware the Boeing apologists making excuses for everything. Even trying to make all the disturbing things sound good or normal.
@harleyearl32892 жыл бұрын
@@gelinrefira That's a good point. What were the Chinese supposed to do, put the engines on top of the wings? That would have been great fun for the passengers. I see substantive improvements, not copying. I'm old enough to remember the Japanese being accused of copying in the 1980s and 90s, but they were more innovative than that. There was also better quality and refinement. That competition inspired my fellow Americans to do better, but there was a lot of anti-Japanese/anti-Asian bitterness being expressed. Now I see the same ugly reactionism toward the Chinese. My fellow Americans should focus more on what we are doing, or what we are not doing, but should. If we started copying some of the things that the Chinese are doing, that would be progress.
@mrrolandlawrence2 жыл бұрын
@@harleyearl3289 fuel comes out the end of the wings as its designed too. when fueled, cold fuel expands and needs to vent. during taxing, it can happen if the fuel temp rises a lot. wings also flex as they are designed too. they even change during flight as supercritical wings are more efficient. the b737 looks old because the fuselage is a chopped down from the b707 - the 1st boeing jet offering. so the design is 70 years old.
@olmedomiro547611 ай бұрын
It is time for some competition in the commercial aviation field in the world. This is wonderful specially after the 737 max fiasco.
@godthunder47322 жыл бұрын
Since you’ve already made a video on the MiG-35 you should make a video on the MiG-29 sometime soon since the MiG-35 video was a while ago.
@air-headedaviator18052 жыл бұрын
Made in China about to become a flex
@JTA19612 жыл бұрын
During turbulence that flex isn't comforting
@leo88aum2 жыл бұрын
Good morning from Toronto, Canada 🇨🇦
@desertblade18742 жыл бұрын
Good evening from Dubai, UAE 🇦🇪
@dizhang22502 ай бұрын
Good afternoon from Nairobi, Kenya 🇰🇪
@johnleong4807 Жыл бұрын
CONGRATULATIONS ,a well done and beautiful job to China. More R&D is further required to work closely along with the various components , control devices and accessaries.
@Learto_amigo2 жыл бұрын
Skyship could you do a Video about the Shanghai Y-10
@jameswikstrom41746 ай бұрын
Excellent video on the advent of the Chinese aviation market . The ARJ21 is just the beginning of the commercial aviation industry in China notwithstanding the assistance provided by the West !
@jordiribas28832 жыл бұрын
You are back, huurrah!!!
@brianho66252 жыл бұрын
I could feel this is a humble video, the way it presents the C919 to the world is more humble and comfortable rather than usual chinese TV program style (I.e. 《厲害了,我的國》(英語:Amazing China). By the way, Russian has MD21 > they already installed their homemake engine against international sanction. Chinese has C919 > they have no homemake commercial grade engine (YET). Just wonder what are Chinese's contingency plan against international sanction on engines and critical aviatronic equipment? Anyway it is a good starts > just like Toyota rollout her first model in 1920s > now it becomes an automobile industrial gaint. So Boeing and Airbus really see COMAC as a threat and serious competition in the future (not like the scale of Embraer, Bombardier nor De Havilland!!!)
@1bhaihay2 жыл бұрын
It should have mentioned that the aircraft has a range of 2,200 nautical miles, enough for most domestic Chinese and regional routes. The C919 can seat 158 to 168 passengers.
@bunyavissuthisorn59092 жыл бұрын
737-8/900 can pack 185+. .......
@SovietBear4 Жыл бұрын
@@bunyavissuthisorn5909 the 737 is a proven design from the 60s. The COMAC is nothing short of amazing! I hope China’s future is bright
@demiwang8469 Жыл бұрын
I believe the maximum range of C919 is around 3500 nm
@ElectricUAM6 ай бұрын
Always informative Sky! The 919's development is logical and the strategy sound. It a certain, that the strategy will try to balancer an EASA-FAA domination, stained by the 737 MAX and the FAA's relationship. There's still a part of me that wishes Asia coming into these new markets could innovate more instead of chasing after what the Werst does. When I go to China and see their SUVs, it's like any other. I wish they could add more Asian flair dot them, if not on the design part.
@fica375 Жыл бұрын
It looks awesome
@willyrusdianudin8832 Жыл бұрын
New flight superpower
@orvilleclisby674810 ай бұрын
The world needs safe planes, may through healthy competition the best manufacturer win.
@xyira7772 жыл бұрын
I think this plane looks great, but no airline where I am from will ever have them, I doubt the c919 or the Irkut mc-21 will ever land in north america which is too bad because both planes look fantastic.
@xmb67932 жыл бұрын
@@openphoto that's political excuse to say, we don't want competition.. LOL
@darcgibson5099 Жыл бұрын
@@openphoto if you believe that, you better believe half of the US technological and other industries are based on stolen IP from the Soviets and Europe. Did Boeing and Airbus steal IP from each other? This BS about “IP theft” is pathetic, and holds no water. Every country, company, designer ever has taken influence and ideas and whole designs from others. Stop whining about China’s development, it only shows you can’t handle that the United States’ industry is built upon the labour and design and talent of foreigners and other countries. Everything you own, top quality and worst quality, is built overseas, designed by other people, etc. The US is a dying empire.
@thisiskevin10006 ай бұрын
Mainland airlines led by China Eastern, Air China, Hainan Airlines and China Southern already made orders. And even GE-backed AerCap have placed orders
@sarahkhan23106 ай бұрын
China civil aviation industry is incredibly impressive. Well done China the sky waits you 👍♥️🇨🇳
@bunyavissuthisorn59092 жыл бұрын
Its inauguration flight is 2012, refered to 2018 Wikipedia. Number built is 10 as of Dec 21, 2022. FAA just endorsed 919 in the last minute, most airlines in China hardly buy it. Such a promising jetliners. ......
@johnsun2416 Жыл бұрын
When will it be available at Walmart?
@georgeszurbach4442 жыл бұрын
We will see if it ever gets FAA or EASA certification if not it will be restricted to Chinese’s airspace
@foorack2 жыл бұрын
Even then it would be hugely successful, because China's internal airplane market is absolutely massive. State owned airlines and even done private ones will favor the national alternative, resulting in automatic guaranteed orders in the thousands.
@HTeo-og1lg2 жыл бұрын
It will most likely be restricted due to the Western governments policy to contain China. China is well-aware of this factoid, but they are patient, strategic, and relentless in their "journey of a thousand miles". They have their space-station now after being excluded from the ISS. Their EV technology is arguably the best in commercial buses and passenger cars. May God bless their humility and patience.
@hjhghj4622 жыл бұрын
We still got asian, russia, south america, africa except you two not forgiving continents.😏 Then boeing and airbus will lose China's martket😂
@zizimai7568 Жыл бұрын
The Asian market will accept the chinese plane. Boeing having issues with their 747 and lost of confidence worldwide, is a good time for Comac to take the market.
@frankgaleon51246 ай бұрын
Good 3D models)
@davidpretiz44396 ай бұрын
Most people don't understand how difficult and complex it is to make machines that safely lift more than 100 people up in the air. A light weight machine that is strong enough. A fuel efficient design will be best.
@someoneelse76292 жыл бұрын
What is the current state of russian aviation? Do they have anything domestic to replace the airplanes that is going to run out of flying hours soon? Will Comac be crucial to replace other brands (with russian engines?) ?
@tomaskulik8011 ай бұрын
Yep, TU-214, will be upgraded to modernised CM spec, so two pilot cockpit (was already done some time ago but never really produced), SJ100 new is already flying with PD8 engines, Irkut MC-21 is flying with PD14 engines, so soon to be delivered, Avionics now run on JetOS, there are other beauties, like il-114-300, close to certification and of course the super mega awesome IL-96-400, but that one will most likely be only used for government services and not commercially (shame). Some smaller projects like Ladoga are also running but that is a small plane. Russians finally stuck their heads out of their asses and will rebuild domestic aircaraft manufacturing to the max potential. Oh an if someone thinks they cannot produce semiconductors for their Aviation sector, please just Google Russian semiconductor industry and grow up.
@wallstreet497 Жыл бұрын
Can the c919 beat the competition on fuel saving if 90% of the plane is aluminium alloy ?
@ssno42032 жыл бұрын
More vids on jet fighters?
@SkyshipsEng2 жыл бұрын
Soon
@PavlosPapageorgiou2 жыл бұрын
I'm glad that the C919 and MC21 exist, but wish they could be the same project.
@mrrolandlawrence2 жыл бұрын
the mc21 is more advanced. it has composite wings for a start. Its comparable to an A320 Neo. its also a lot cheaper than the c919.
@lb_reflections2 жыл бұрын
As I watch this, there are 919 Likes!! ^_^
@hourbee55352 жыл бұрын
Thought that was an airbus A320 in the thumbnail.
@SkyshipsEng2 жыл бұрын
Haha, the A320 from the AliExpress
@kicker35952 жыл бұрын
A320 is a copie of B737, the first take off, crash in Habsheim, following with 46 crashs, over 8000 passagers dead, hihihihihihi
@albertabound51242 жыл бұрын
@@kicker3595 Utter bullshit. Why do trolls make up lies out of thin air? According to Boeing's own stats, the A320ceo is 80 times safer than the 737MAX, 3 times safer than the 737 Classic, and slightly better (not statistically significant different) than the 737NG. You are about one order of magnitude off on the death numbers, and Habsheim (which was NOT the 1st flight) was caused by the pilots literally flying into the forest due to lack of airshow planning (the FBW saved most onboard by not allowing a stall). Since then the A320 has an accident rate of 0.08 per million (the neo is at 0.00), compared to 7.12 with the 737MAX. Source: skybrary.aero/sites/default/files/bookshelf/32664.pdf
@imnewlight11 ай бұрын
@@kicker3595737 literally has the highest kill count
@ishagabdulrazzak62982 жыл бұрын
Every person, every country, every nation or every individual will be given by Allah for their progress.
@VigneshV-lo6fi2 жыл бұрын
Awesome video!!!!
@wongpohchan94852 жыл бұрын
I read that the prototype of the bigger CR929 200+seater is either completed or near completion. The CR929 is jointly produced by Russia and China. I suppose the R stands for Russia. I am sure there will be a CR939.....and others.
@mrrolandlawrence2 жыл бұрын
its interesting then why the chinese just put in a bumper order for the airbus a320 series of aircraft. the c919 will need composite wings to get the weight down, but im sure thats possible in future as china seems to be able to scale and adapt quickly. just look at their car industry.
@SafepathUS2 жыл бұрын
🤔 The father of Boeing is Chinese Wong Tsu, the first chief engineer of Boeing. He talked about how to innovate the aircraft's qualities to be known as the first Boeing passenger aircraft. See KZbin channel The Museum of Flight and YT channel "Hot topics time" We're almost all from other countries and very few of us are 100% natural native American Indians. I can say I believe I'm "American" the proverbial meaning of a typical USA citizen. But as the largest ethnic group, Germans, even I was taught we're almost all from other countries who came to the US and moved to anywhere life has more abundance of naturally available resources and helping others to live a healthier happy life too 😀 but recent years since tte pandemic we see many fake belief systems proven to be a front for greedy corporations treating people as Sheeple for profits over people's interest and thus we're relearning from our past innovations to help improve many ways. 👍 Thank you for your attention to modernization and developments.
@didyoumissedmegobareatersk22042 жыл бұрын
Do u think chinese will now claim boieng
@SafepathUS2 жыл бұрын
@@didyoumissedmegobareatersk2204 only the history lesson here reminds us Chinese have been often not credited in our history books, for growing our US economy in various ways. Also Chinese largely helped with hard work building our original railways, yet not much references in our history books. Many were promised pay and fair treatment yet many unfortunately were abused or often killed off with owners going unpunished and paid much less respect as slaves, similarly as Natural Native Indians were mistreated. And European "popularized Italian foods" taking credit for "noodles, pasta & pizza" originally long ago was brought by famous "Marco Polo" traveling back from China, introduced various original foods & recipes to Europe, Plus various things including the original technology of the first Boeing passenger aircraft too. Mr Boeing's efforts promoted Boeing same as Elon Musk promoted Tesla when no other "investors" were interested.
@craigslistseller93542 жыл бұрын
@@SafepathUS I trust Elon Muskrat as much as I trust MSNBC...
@craigslistseller93542 жыл бұрын
Very well said.
@craigslistseller93542 жыл бұрын
It has been speculated (and refuted, of course) that the bodies of hundreds of unpaid Chinese railroad workers would be found at the bottom of Lake Tahoe today...preserved by the ultra cold temperatures down there. I wouldn't be surprised if this was true...even after all the 'fact-checking'...🤔🤨🧐
@siviweslara10232 күн бұрын
The US and EU is yet to certify the C909 even thou it's been on air for longer that 7 years, Is there a reason for this? And how might that impact the certification of the C919?
@fredferd965 Жыл бұрын
How does this aircraft compare with the Sukhoi SU-100 Superjet?
@samsharp85392 жыл бұрын
Philosophy: Aeronautical engineers make a beautiful aircraft, and believe that pilots will destroy his creation. Pilots believe that the aero engineers are just trying to kill us. Ask me how we know.
@nathanielcallender22 жыл бұрын
C919 is a beautiful look6 aircraft
@Embargoman2 жыл бұрын
To say all this is not just McDonnell Douglas making the DC-9 and 10 in China, but Airbus was the first aircraft manufacture to build a facility in Tianjin to assemble A320s, this could also lead toward Airbus and it’s new market of strategy. Companies like Mitsubishi, and Honda from Japan are also in the works but most likely it is more possible to see Qantas using a passenger aircraft build by a company from Japan than in a COMAC- C919. Markets ready not to count Airbus out as Airbus acquired Bombardier from Canada and yet soon Airbus will have a Korean manufacture under their belt; that projects on the next A320 will be the most fuel efficient passenger aircraft in the world not to say what Airbus will do next after the failure of the Boeing 737 MAX 9 yet a newer more state of the art Airbus A320 plane; could be on the works of a Boeing failure in South Korea. But in that case COMAC-C919 could have a tough time competing with Boeing and Airbus while Boeing where to fail in South Korea, then Airbus acquired Korea Aerospace Industries and gets involved with the F-21 Hawk project known as Boramae as government contracts switched to be in favor of Airbus and Airbus will probably end up working with NASA and probably be involving with South Korea’s space projects; to say potential for Airbus will be the Airbus Korea division will be more successful and South Korea becomes Airbus country that all South Korean Airliners will only use Airbus and nothing else.
@peekaboopeekaboo1165 Жыл бұрын
Skyship, there's nothing "weird" about the COMAC 919. And the Chinese isn't making any "claim" for it.
@DiamondAviator42 жыл бұрын
Ni hao aviators. This is so interesting 😃
@milehighclassics2 жыл бұрын
Would be nice to see Chinese people get a good wage for there work 😊
@theinfralink65982 жыл бұрын
Some of them are probably making more money than you!