I Resubmitted 100 CGC Graded Comic Books

[@AnteroMachin-bz6dx]

That xmen 266 from a 9.6 and trying for a 9.8 and comes back a 7.0? Did you see what the grader notes were?

[@moodswing4460]

The amount of grades that changed was crazy. Some of those jumps were troubling. I don't know how they can misgrade the book that bad. Makes me hesitant to send books in.

[@wolves1fan830]

Seems more like a money maker for cgc just think if they under grade all books hoping they get resubmitted to get graded again how much money it makes the company

[@Comicbookyoutubersrock]

Not really. Grading ultimately is subjective, and it’s always the average of 3 graders per book. Due to that method, changes can occur consistently if you resubmit a book. This activity actually makes sense. And the 8.5 to 9.8 makes sense. Unfortunately it was likely mis graded the first time around. Just correctly graded this time.

[@moodswing4460]

@@Comicbookyoutubersrock you think cgc still actually has 3 graders grade every book? I highly doubt that. How could 3 graders give a book a 7.5 and then it gets graded a 9.4 or higher. I would bet my bottom dollar that most books are graded by one person. Especially moderns.

[@Comicbookyoutubersrock]

@@moodswing4460 Yeah I mean I just go by what they tell you the process is. Is it possible you’re right, yeah, but until there’s proof of it I have to assume it’s the average of 3 graders per book as they state is the process for every book. As far as the 7.5 to 9.4 situation, I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again, these are not machines. These are humans grading comics, and humans are inherently prone to make mistakes. So in that instance, if a book was just resubmitted, not pressed/cleaned or anything like that before being sent back in, than it’s extremely likely “they” as in 3 graders messed up the first time around. I mean we’re talking thousands of books daily. Even with a system where 3 people routinely check books out, assuming that’s the case, I highly doubt mistakes don’t happen.

[@Hopelesslittlekilljoy]

They seem to have zero quality control like they must just have people grading however they’re feeling that day 😭

[@jpl484]

It would be interesting to know what the totall value bump was , you spent "X" to submit the 100 books, that where valued at "Y" and after you got them back with the ups and downs the new total value of the 100 books is now "Z" .. so Z - X = your potential overall net profit from the exercise. This was a great entertaining piece of content , btw.. thanks!

[@ComicBookInvestments]

Thanks. Maybe I’d this is a hit video I’ll do another one and add that in there

[@danfoley2442]

Loved this episode, really interesting exercise! Net profit (or loss if negative) would be Z - (X + Y) = Z - X - Y .

[@MetalBum]

Yes net would be great or just some of the expenses and value bumps

[@deandee3270]

CGC's inconsistency is really scary.

[@Darth.Shredder]

It's like home plate umpires calling balls and strikes. Unless it's the same person grading everything there will always be inconsistencies. Even the same person can see things differently at different times. It's all a crapshoot.

[@MakThaNife]

This is why I rarely ever submit comics to CGC. I'd rather just buy graded books with the grade I want. I prefer the majority of my collection raw anyway.

[@moodswing4460]

I find these types of videos pretty entertaining. Definitely should do more of these.

[@ComicBookInvestments]

Well I would but it’s hard to have 100 resubmits

[@moodswing4460]

@@ComicBookInvestments Yeah, you definitely had a lot.

[@Quasi_Terrible]

​​@@ComicBookInvestmentswell I will send you a bunch of resubmits you can crack them, send them in, shoot the video and send them back to me? What do you say? 😂

[@peterviles6320]

Great video, appreciate the editing work

[@ComicBookInvestments]

Thanks. Ya lots of edits

[@gnosticsam]

I really really enjoyed this video. Watching some of the grade drops makes me feel better about my purchasing lower 9 grades instead always shooting for the 9.8. Thanks for all your hard work editing and putting together this video. Well done! 😊

[@ComicBookInvestments]

Thanks

[@joehenry9546]

“Maybe I’ll be dead and you’ll never see this video”. Lol. Funny and dark at the same time.

[@ComicBookInvestments]

Hahaha and true. But I’m alive. Or I’m just an AI and I died long ago

[@RACALDERONR]

Just realistic, noone is a special case lol

[@edwinprice8880]

Very interesting and expensive experiment. I recognized years ago that the slabbers are totally inconsistent. I first submitted books around 2003. Back then CGC had some credibility, was reasonably priced and typically got books back in six weeks. Then along came CBCS. Both graders quickly became equally erratic and terrible. I haven’t submitted any books to be plasticized in over 2 years. Instead, I have sold off many slabs and cracked open many in my pc. I’m much happier with raw books. I spent 25+ years owning comic shops and using Overstreet grading guidelines. Henceforth, that’s what I’m doing every time. To the devil with CGC, CBCS and PGX.

[@katee_kat]

First, I do truly enjoy watching this video. My issue is that doing this does ultimately make the census completely unreliable on an EPIC level. When calculating the fair market value, many rely upon the census as part of the equation. Again, I appreciate and respect your experiment and the outcome, but I can’t help but wonder how the census is even remotely accurate or worthwhile anymore. Thoughts? I am kinda sad with the loss of this resource when assessing fair value… I really hope you don’t take this personal! I enjoy you and your channel tremendously! Sorry but thank you kindly for your awesome content!!! ❤

[@poing333]

Really nice way to say CGC is bullshit and graded slabs dont mean anything in regards to actual quality assessment

[@matthewmarlin7566]

I really enjoyed this video and found it fascinating… and troubling. The swings in grade are just crazy in some cases, particularly with no re-press in between. I appreciated that you did not re-press the books, for the sake of the experiment, but if it was me, I would feel like that was leaving money on the table. Also, it really bugs me tbh that you don’t send your old labels back in; if not with this submission then separately or with a future submission. I think everyone should do this, for the integrity of the census, but particularly with someone doing as much volume as you do, and with as big of a platform as you have.

[@poing333]

Lmfao if CGC actually did what they purport to- grade accurately, then the grades would have all come back the same & the census data would be fine... but they don't. Cuz grading doesn't mean shit.

[@nicecoverbro1804]

Interesting video. Do you plan on sending in a batch of cgc labels to them so they fix the census?

[@danielmitchel31310]

Also wondering.

[@starchild6347]

Great video! Appreciate the amount of work that went into it. Would be interesting to hear what CGC said about it all!

[@chadnelson1150]

Man, this video is awesome. Yeah, making a seperate quick video to look at potential profit margin after resubmitting the 100 would be pretty cool. This was an excellent video.

[@theblackbudda]

That was a ton of fun to watch. Thanks my man

[@MrGrouch86]

just curious, does this mess with the census numbers? For example on the fighting man comic you said theres only a few in that grade. is now there another? or do you let them know after that the origional cracked one got replaced?

[@ComicBookInvestments]

It does mess with the census. So there is actually a lot less that exist

[@Chris-ty7fw]

@@ComicBookInvestments A pity you can't submit the labels (post grading I can see why you souldn't do it with the books for grading) to get the census down which would also help with your books worth in future?

[@tradepaperdad8858]

As I understand it, you must mail the old labels to CGC to update the registry. Did you keep the old labels?

[@3dMartin]

Amazing video! Thank you for taking the time to post this video and all the editing. Keep uo the great work and video content.

[@davidsamuelson2089]

Just look at the graders notes … oh that’s right …

[@Tom_Agnetti]

Started watching your channel with interview with your dad and it got me thinking about my Dad and I and our live for comics. Ive never sent anything in, but this is both encouraging and discouraging at the same time. I guess only one person looks at it and can vary.

[@ComicBookInvestments]

Ya. That is why it’s important to know how to grade yourself. As you can know that if it gets a bad grade. To try again

[@stonyonekenobi]

What the heck went wrong with xmen 266!? Geez that's a big drop. Was there damage from cracking the slab?

[@dustinandrews7409]

That was a awesome video man. Thank you for taking the time to put that out.

[@johndillon6705]

That had to be so much work! Thanks for this, really enjoyed it!

[@ComicBookInvestments]

Glad you enjoyed it!

[@rcaw1968]

Love the cuts from .. OLD Dave -to- NEW Dave .. I was cracking up. BTW, happy you didn't die!

[@ComicBookInvestments]

Hahah thanks. I could be dead though. This might just be imposter Dave

[@State-uw8pu]

On high value books do you use a 3rd party for CPR? Sending another box of 9 tomorrow for auction There's a Nice GA Cap #72

[@xenaluck]

don't forget to send in the old grader tags to keep the census more accurate. every little bit helps the community.

[@matthewmilad]

I have a couple of comics I'm going to open up to get signed and then resubmit. What's the best way to do it? Submit in the same slabs as before?

[@BIGPAPA55]

What dose it say about grading companies. I have seen and heard a-lot of stories like this.

[@josephbarbera9220]

Shocking to see how grades vary for the same comic!! It all goes to show you the grading process is mostly subjective. I wouldn’t be surprised if the grader flips a coin to decide to go half point up or down. I feel CGC needs to eliminate so many grade points and just have only five different grading numbers. It’s way to chaotic in determining the grade of a comic. Very informative content Dave! 👏👏👏👍

[@stampscapes]

Amazes me that the time and cost of resubmission would make it (potentially) worth it (with a lot of them). Really interesting vid. Wonder if CGC will see this as a good or bad thing. Pretty consistent but those big swings in grade on a couple can't be good.

[@Future-Classic-Cars]

I laughed so hard when you jumped from a new t-shirt to maybe I'll dead. (Slight differences there Davo.) 😂

[@mingaling72]

Amazing video! Thanks for the effort and insight!!

[@thundergodd6086]

Great video. Gratz on your triumphs.

[@koschei1975]

Dave. I’ve got about a dozen I need you to look at that I’d love to know if I should resubmit. You could have a business just doing that. 😂 Great video, keep up the good work.

[@davidsamuelson2089]

A professional grading service shouldn’t have to depend on the mood of the grader. They just have zero standards or consistency, but at least they sure can charge a lot for amateur grading.

[@dlewand691]

Thanks for sharing all of the results. Crazy swings! So did you do anything to them after cracking out? Re-press? And did you send them in under the "resubmit" option? What is that option and would it have given any better results? Thanks!

[@RPRsChannel]

*_This is what happens when a company pays people $15/hour._* *_This is disturbing to see. A great video, but it is disturbing that there were so many grade changes that spanned several grades bumps._* *_Going from a 3.0 to a 3.5 is not that "insane", but that one jump of 6 grades up and the other one down so much really makes me wonder._* *_What's missing here is the total value before and after. I can just look this all up, we all can, so why not just say what it is?_* *_I wonder how many more of the books would have gotten a grade bump if they were pressed and lightly cleaned(if needed). There was a 70% improvement in grades as is._*

[@ddougherty8266]

Great Video! So anyone who puts faith in the CGC grade should think about this... ANYTIME a highly experienced person (as you certainly are) gets a grade that's lower than they think it should be on a big book, they're going to crack it and resubmit... and they're more than likely to get the grade "corrected"... Right? Sounds reasonable... but here's the flip side... every time such a person gets a grade that is higher than it should be... They do a happy dance and they sell it based on the grade that's too high. So... what that means is that the grade that collectors see on a big book is either accurate, or a little high (because it was accurate or too high in the first place, or it's over-stated (in the case where they got lucky and didn't resubmit). So, as more and more people have big books cracked and re-graded that they think are under-graded, the AVERAGE CGC grade on big books are actually over-stated - they will tend to skew too high because of the ones that are over-graded are accepted as is. Simple math. Collectors should keep that in mind when buying a big book that they can't hold in their hands and be happy about themselves. And collectors who aren't experts shouldn't be buying big books based on the CGC grade without a consultant - because the grade (which creates the price) isn't necessarily accurate (it may be over-stated by a lot). You only submitted books that you thought were UNDER-graded. Right? Had you put aside every "gift grade" you got over the past 2 years, you'd probably have gotten 69 downgrades. CGC grades are not adequate indicators of value. But great video.

[@ccsportsfan7886]

excellent thanks for the hard work you do on these videos

[@franciossebastian9752]

Hi David love the video as always man.I really hope you reply to this.I am going to on Collectors Comics for the first time tonight.Does every seller on Collectors Comics ship Internationally. Maybe if I buy of any seller then Collectors Comics Ships on behalf of the seller.I really have been struggling now for 7 months now with those ridiculous Ebay restrictions to South Africa. Really appreciate the help David.

[@desiredcomics]

Good segment! Keep these resubmit shows going.

[@nerdyoldwoman9651]

I really enjoyed this video! I know you must have busted your rear end editing, but it was worth it for the viewing pleasure. Do it again, please!❤

[@ComicBookInvestments]

Thanks. Ya I might do another like this but I have to have enough books to get regraded

[@kousx2]

This my favorite vid ever!! You can return old labels so they can update the census.

[@terri_blueberri]

This is inspiring. I have a few books I don't agree with and think I'll resend. 8.5-9.8 though, crazy.

[@drancealot]

can't you send the cracked labels back to CGC so they can remove them from the census? That way there won't be two 7.5s of the Fighting Man Annual.

[@ComicBookInvestments]

Ya I do that after. If I send it in with the label they will give it the same grade

[@stevencosta3148]

Awesome video, very much enjoyed it. Dave I would love a video of you grading books before ypu send them. You are very good at rough grading, would love to see what you look for and how your process for grading the way you do. I shall call you Sensei Dave. Lol😅. Teach us hacks the way of the grading force

[@Bakerfan]

Great job in production presentation and must have taken a long time to put together. I enjoyed watching this despite the annoying background music so Thanks for going thru this experiment which we all think of doing at some point.

[@ericwilliams1845]

This enforces my belief every book exists in a range. Most went up a grade (4.5-5.0 or 7.5-8.0) and to me that also speaks to CGC consistency which is a good thing. The ones that came back same obviously are probably maxed out and he one that dropped a grade well you lucked out getting the higher or their range originally. The ones that bear investigation are the ones going from 7s to 9s with no work done. Or down the same way. That Xmen 266 needs some explaining. My guess is the Mario was graded by a rookie who didn’t know about the printing flaw that can exist on that book

[@ComicBookInvestments]

All these were cherry picked as getting bad grades to begin with. So it was mostly just upside. The ones that got huge swings. Got really really bad grades to begin with then for way too good of grades after

[@ericwilliams1845]

@@ComicBookInvestments that makes sense that most would go up slightly or down or stay the same. It also makes sense that out of 100, bound to get 1-2 that were grossly undergraded or over graded as it is human error

[@CireWorrom]

I completely agree with your viewpoint and concur that CGC did pretty good existing in that range given that these books were specifically selected as likely under-graded candidates by a very experienced seller. Many sellers seem to like to always add the 'grading is subjective' line to their listings to cover their butts - and it is, but generally only to a point. A grade within 1 grade above it or below is 'subjective'. Calling stuff 'near mint' that is really in the 7-8 range, as many onile sellers do, is just trying to take advantage of people and the disadvantages of online dealing. The strangest one here appears to be the 9.8 Swamp Thing, apparently going from severely under-graded to marginally over-graded based on his expectations. To an 'expert' 9.6-9.8 should be fairly apparent. An expert should be able to tell if a book is in 'perfect' condition.

[@davidyoungblood7887]

Great video. I hope to see more of these.

[@tonyspare2468]

Cool video man I like how you did it seems like a lot of work, good job

[@bdav1967]

WOW! 69 out of 100 got a bump! Shows you know what you're doing. Great video!

[@marcdesnoyers1839]

It's great to see you got most of the bumps you wanted but the question I have is shouldn't you be sending the old blue labels back so that the census is correct?

[@ComicBookInvestments]

Ya I will later. Not with the re sub or they will just give it the same grade again

[@katee_kat]

Then why bother with sending any labels back? It’s still fuckin up the census. This is not personal, many others do it too. I’ve owned a small comic business since 2008 and have always referenced the census as a “tool” to show my customers…gonna bury that reference now as it’s clearly flawed and misleading.

[@scooobydoo27]

What were the grader notes on the one that dropped from 9.6 to 7.0? That seems like a crazy drop.

[@danmcinerney3594]

Yeah, please share. A 2.6pt decrease is significant. You didn’t explain the reasons

[@superneilcomics8196]

Congrats on most of those grades Dave🙂 I am so happy for you 🙂

[@ComicBookInvestments]

Thank you

[@siriactuallysara]

It’s frustrating when the grade goes down. I had one that went from 9.0 to 8.5 and 9.6 to 9.2

[@ComicBookInvestments]

Yes it is

[@thewebdood]

Dude awesome experiment. It took A TON of work though! I get batches back where I can tell the grader was having a bad day...

[@billyuscategui]

Great video, very entertaining. Nice job on your grading skills.

[@ComicBookInvestments]

Thanks so much!

[@rhmidwestcomics]

Amazing!!! Nicely done.

[@yanmcrae6106]

Amazing video and demonstrates the vagaries, but also, some of the consistency of the CGC grading system. Like you said, these were hand picked because you would grade them differently. Do you think the overall cost of resubmitting these hundred books was worth the gain, and occasional lost, in value? lol, I'm sure it was as there was $2300 value chage just in the Doom book. Nice work.

[@WinglessNetwork]

This was a fun video to watch. Thanks!

[@ComicBookInvestments]

Glad you enjoyed it!

[@reeftheseaforever]

back in 1999 ebay was rampant with sneaky dealers and in 2001 cgc came out as a third party grading service to level the playing field for buyers and put sellers on notice that over grading was looked down upon. I would never have thought I would be watching a video on reslabbing comics so u can have a grade increase good video lol

[@michaelcalabrese2960]

I enjoy your videos. Thanks for sharing

[@timothybrandt6911]

I definitely appreciate seeing the results from this and the afterwards data from it. I do larger submissions to cgc a few times a year and this is also something I've considered doing when I don't agree with the graders notes or grades assigned to books I've submitted.

[@gregm7269]

Love this idea for a post! I always wanted to send a group of 9.8 pre-screens that didn't make the cut the first time and see if some received 9.8 the second go around?

[@michaell7809]

Wow that was a lot of cracking out ! Did you do any work to any of the books ?

[@NoCoastComics]

Congrats on all the bumps!

[@wlnorris75]

This just shows that "professional" grading isn't so professional. Having graded comics for 30 years, I fully admit that grading is as much art as science. However, there is no excuse for jumps from 7.5 to 9.6, or a drop from a 9.6 to a 7.0. This means you can't count on that slabbed 9.8 you are paying for being any better than an 8.0. It could be anything and you are paying a huge premium! I stand my grading being within +/- one half-grade if I grade it once or 100 times. There shouldn't be any more variance than that with a "professional" grading company grading the same book.

[@wutango36o]

This video shows just the opposite of your point. They did 100 books and were accurate in all but 97+% of them, that's pretty damn good. The x-men 266 was damaged which he let us know. And most people overgrade their books to make more money on their raw books, that's why CGC came out in the first place, to get away from sellers that aren't objectively grading. So grading is amazing. I would never buy a book that says it will be a 9.6 to 9.8. If so, they would just get it graded and make major profits. Think about it ..

[@wlnorris75]

@@wutango36o Did you even watch the same video? You are just making stuff up and pulling it out of thin air!!! He resubmitted 100 books and the grades changed on 78 of them!!! Only 22% remained the same grade!!! How do you get they were 97% accurate when 78% of the grades changed!!! And there is never an excuse for a book jumping up that much in grade (unless you have cleaned/pressed/etc). It could get damaged being unslabbed, and go down, but never an excuse for a 2-point jump on the same book! That was a defect in the service and there should be a refund of grading fees! Forking over 3X the price of a 9.6 for a 9.8, yeah, well it was an 8.0 on the last submission, so what are you really getting for 3X more money!!! Now admittedly, it isn't as bad as 78% inaccurate, because many of the books only changed by one sub-grade, again, a reasonable standard. But one you apply that standard 99.9% of the books should have came back graded within +/- one sub-grade. I think by my count, over 20% came back with a bigger swing than one sub-grade, which is bad performance from a "professional" grading service! Would you go to a grading service who's motto was "We accurately grade your comics 80% of the time!" The other scary part is he said he did hand pick these as books he thought the messed up on. I bet if he sent in 100 books that he thought they got right, just as many grades would change!

[@wlnorris75]

And I know dealers who will send in 50 copies of a book for 9.8 pre-screens and get back 20% in 9.8 slabs. Then they will submit the remaining 40 pre-screens a 2nd time, and get another 5 or 6 9.8's out of those rejected before. I don't think they submit for a third round at that point, because cost is lower than reward. But how did they miss those 5-6 9.8's on the first pre-screen?!

[@wutango36o]

@@wlnorris75 its called not being perfect. 90-95% accuracy is incredibly good. Thanks for making my point

[@wlnorris75]

@@wutango36o You probably shouldn't be an an English message board if you can't read and comprehend English. Care to explain how they were 90-95% accurate when only 22% of the grades didn't change? That would be 22% accurate. Even if you use my expanded definition of accuracy +/- one sub-grade, over 20% of the books were still wrong by more than a sub-grade. That makes the accuracy less than 80%. You are trying real hard to look silly...

[@Whoisleaflettuce]

So grading doesn’t mean crap and the census is completely wrong, got it

[@peterkalos6271]

Great video!! I’m curious did cgc give you grader notes for the Xmen 266?!? Because 2.6 grade point difference is crazy!! Like a 9.6 and a 7.0 present totally different!

[@ComicBookInvestments]

It got damaged

[@toddkey6212]

This video makes me want to go thru my slabs again. There have been many comics I've submitted that I really thought were under graded. This vid makes me think I should give resubbing a try.

[@ComicBookInvestments]

Always worth a try

[@Future-Classic-Cars]

Did you send any for a clean and press? The second time? And do you send them in slabbed? Or crack them out sebd them raw on the re submission?

[@danielmitchel31310]

Do you ever return your old Labels from cracked slabs for CGC to correct/amend the Census?

[@daviddesjardins7751]

CGC results are highly subjective, and frankly a tax on collecters.

[@robertbanning6393]

Some of those grade jumps were absolutely ridiculous. My question is, did you do anything other than remove them from the containers? Were any of them pressed or cleaned?

[@ghostme1635]

Sometimes when you go to a restaurant your portion of fries are way bigger than usual and your burger tastes better, because someone decided to hook you up by putting on an extra patty, extra tomato and more pickles on it . But sometimes they burn the burger and forget your fries.

[@chrissiebeneck3294]

...based on the results, the money spent/money earned, and time to press; would you do this experiment again but press the books?

[@ComicBookInvestments]

Yes I would. But again these were cherry picked as the best candidates to get a grade bump and financially worth it too

[@toddkey6212]

@@ComicBookInvestments Did you mention in the video the overall value gained by doing this resub experiment?

[@verified893]

I always send the blue labels back in another shipment after my re-grades come back. Just in case there is a rule where they compare the two. Tin foil hat style.

[@ActionFigureGrader]

Great video, really enjoyed this one

[@ComicBookInvestments]

Thanks. Glad you liked it

[@torontograilz]

Crazy video love it

[@davidsamuelson2089]

It all depends on the mood of the grader. There is little that prevents resins from bouncing grades. If you have the time & money just keep subbing 9.6s.

[@CharlesThomas-vs8ir]

Wow...Awesome brother. Sure wish I could grade that well. I always end up between 8.5-9.6

[@soldjer21]

that just goes to show how bad their ratings are, to go from a 7.5 to 9.6 is huge how do you do that ??

[@pedrojuarez2483]

Thanks4 making this vid... it just shows the inaccuracies and inconsistent grading from a 3rd party company... from the grades u received, 2even u pointing out that the census is messed up from people CPR graded books... I'm not against slabbing books, by any means. Especially 4preservation purposes. But this vid is an eye opener 4sure. Thx David 👍

[@wolves1fan830]

How is the census accurate with all the cracking and resubmitting It has to be way off

[@Joeh1154]

So Dave, you just cracked them out of their slabs and resubmitted without at least a C&P? Do you think it would have made a difference on the books that came back at the same grade before the resubmit? Do you send them in with the previous label or not? This was a fun video. Thanks for posting.

[@BigMoneyGripMCV]

have you seen a 9.8 have 1 color-breaking spine tick?

[@jimrivett9926]

Interesting video and a credit to your grading ability.

[@ComicBookInvestments]

Thanks

[@geekimusprime]

11:40 Wtf happened with that X-Men 266? 9.6 to 7.0?

[@mizedom8167]

Love to see how CGC and CBCS compare in consistency.

[@cybergrindin]

Do u send back the old label & let ‘em know for the census? I wouldn’t lol

[@ComicBookInvestments]

I don’t when I send them in. But I will at a later date

[@jordansupremes]

were these comics cracked and opened before sending in for a new submission?

[@funkified-]

That Xmen 266 was painful! Does it look like it was damaged? On the whole though it shows how subjective and volitile grading can be, especially in those mid grades. Great video though, we need to see the dollars and cents breakdown though, that will tie this all together.

[@johnnydropkicks]

I’m at the beginning of the video and I think that this will be very eye-opening.

[@michaelalmanza2046]

Great video. Graphic on the Star Wars 68 was wrong. You did get the 9.4.

[@ComicBookInvestments]

Whoops. My mistake

[@miguelh4750]

Gambit 9.6 to 7.0 did they drop the book ???

[@ComicBookInvestments]

It got damaged

[@raleighdentcompany]

​@@ComicBookInvestmentsIs there any recourse for you if that happens?

[@Indie2kNBA]

It goes to show u cgc is a scam

[@vinniwhitlock7080]

I’m a musician as well…is there a sound cloud I can go to to give a follow…love the content 🤘🤘🤘

[@ComicBookInvestments]

I’m on Spotify, Apple Music, pretty much everywhere. Also all my albums are on KZbin as well. @LoveAngelesMusic on KZbin. My bands name is love angeles

[@maxgees99]

Yes, some shockers. Need to compare grader notes. Pleasantly surprised how the lower to mid grades come back within 0.5 or 1.0 of original, as that range seems much more subjective in nature.

[@mauricedevereaux6573]

Fantastic video David! Informative and funny, your dialogue to future you was hilarious! Takeaways, it is important to know how how to grade to spot the times CGC makes a human error and then resubmit when we disagree with them. I am certain, many of your viewers who got slabs back where they disagreed with the grade will be going to look at them closely. Cheers!...:)

[@ComicBookInvestments]

Thanks. Yes it pays to know how to grade

[@xerogenesis2003]

Re: Fighting Man - is there a way to send back labels or something like that, to have the books removed from the census?

[@jakeys2457]

Fun video but it is a little concerning how inconsistent their grading is, especially the Gambit (how do they grade a 9.4 one time and a 7.0 the second time).

[@ComicBookInvestments]

It got damage d