Comparison of ATR 72 vs. Dash 8 Q400 most popular turboprop aircraft,

Comparison of ATR 72 vs. Dash 8 Q400.
We will look at the ATR 72 and Dash 8 turboprop-powered aircraft in this video. Both have a similar appearance, however, they differ in terms of their operations.
#ATR72 #Dash8 #DHC #ATRaircraft

[@broddsaviation5471]

I'd say that the DHC-8-400 is more of a competitor for the CRJ's on regional routes despite being a bit slower

[@SGUY_6000]

Nah, the ERJs are a competitor for the CRJs, not the q400

[@mustafashaheen8229]

Thank you very much for this impressive video Salute from Egypt 🇪🇬 with love and respect.

[@26.riteshnumakal75]

Canada love 💕 from India

[@bijaysitaula7006]

ATR cant carry 90 passengers, even 80 passengers can accommodate is in high density configuration with less legrooms . But it is best and affordable aircraft for small regional routes . Dash Q400 have better performance then ATR with more seats but also expensive than ATR but have more range. Engine is quite powerful of Q400. Dash 8 speed goes above 600km/hrs.

[@ryandymond2195]

The Dash 8-400 has a range of 2500 KM, not 2400 KM. Also the cruise speed is 667 KM/H instead of 530 KM/H.

[@charliebowman785]

Ryan, 530 Kph is speed for ATR.

[@CanadianTexaninLiguria]

@@charliebowman785 video is wrong, not Ryan

[@kendallevans4079]

You really felt it necessary to correct the difference in 100KM? Do you feel relief?

[@captaindoggo69420]

2:05 just your average dash 8 landing

[@nospark333]

From a maintenance stand point, I much prefer working on the ATR.

[@CatarineausArmory]

That Q400 is a hotrod.

[@MrEthanhines]

and since there's still no dash-8 on msfs I have to use the ATR-72

[@rust2156]

ATR or dash 8 ?

[@antr7493]

I like both

[@mohitchanchal4897]

What about fuel efficiency

[@noele6588]

You want long range pull her back to 300ktas.

[@geordanielrohiumbundima7440]

Good👍

[@mdmuhibbullahstudent1062]

I like DASH8 Q400 aircraft from Bangladesh

[@davidalvarez9723]

I think the main concern about the atr is the icing. It has severe problems with that.

[@battshytkrazy156]

Past tense

[@truenoae8689]

Q400 is designed in Canada so no wonder it's better with snow and ice lol

[@charliebowman785]

In the past, there was for me only one turboprop along with DASH8 and that one was the Fokker 50. For me, both airplanes Fokker 50 and DASH 8 or Q400 are the same but with slight differences. Honestly, ATR is a cheap airplane but has no chances against Fokker 50 or Dehavilland DASH8. Believe me, if Fokker 50 is back in business, ATR will be blown away from scenario.

[@Majaen22]

Biased

[@michelbeauloye4269]

I agree with you, the F50 was a great turboprop, but its seat capacity (50 passengers if I remember well) was much less than the newer aircraft that replaced it.

[@MACHETICO7]

Prefer ATR

[@danielhartwig6333]

👍😊🇦🇺🥳

[@theeggheochannel9758]

2:45 wtf

[@NitinKumar-nb4lv]

ATR is way superior and economical

[@LieutenantAdam]

I swear dash 8 and atr 72 are similar

[@corolla9545]

They only differ on the landing gear configuration 😊😊

[@motiroherbal]

P

[@Dayeda]

Q400 is better

[@Themapleleaforever]

Facts

[@SGUY_6000]

Saab 340 better

[@filipborin555]

What?😂

[@managed9348]

ATR is superior

[@Themapleleaforever]

Cap

[@managed9348]

@@Themapleleaforever is the q400 still in production?

[@Realixit]

Is the atr still in production? Why don't you buy one?