COMPARISON REVIEW: SONY 28-70 F/2 GM vs Sigma 28-45 F/1.8 vs Sony GM 24 35 50 vs 24-50g

[@nVuFilms]

CORRECTION.@10:52 the photo on the left is actuslly the Sony 28-70 @ 70mm kzbin.info/www/bejne/f2auiX6aYt-Jbas&si=HS3Gf-IB3qg028O4

[@mjneudigate1]

Bro this is the exact video I've been hoping for. Appreciate you and keep up the good shit

[@nVuFilms]

💯 bro thanks for watching

[@vinhmanphoto]

This lens is incredible, just shot a 13hr wedding coverage with it and didn’t use my 2nd body at all.

[@nVuFilms]

💯

[@mellenix]

"GM stands for 'Got Money'" - Vu Nguyen. So true lol!

[@nVuFilms]

💀

[@cinegenies4651]

I heard God Money 😆

[@nVuFilms]

@cinegenies4651 might as well be that

[@kevinrtres]

Interesting difference in the bokehs. The ideal lens is of course the 16-300 f/1.4 constant aperture, parfocal lens with semi circular bokeh.

[@nVuFilms]

@@kevinrtres that would be a BBC-L

[@Adreno23421]

16-300 f1.4 LOL

[@Michael_Nolen]

Hey there fella. I’m gonna binge watch your channel because you are hilarious. 😂 great content. Greetings from Atlanta Georgia ✌🏿

[@nVuFilms]

Thanks my guy ☝️💯🙏

[@ABarrera]

This video sold me on the 28-70!

[@nVuFilms]

🙏🙏

[@cinegenies4651]

Great review and comparisons, thank you ! I'm glad we can see the true differences in bokeh of those zooms and primes !!

[@nVuFilms]

💯

[@Hawaiian_lightning]

Just got this in the mail today. Can’t wait to put it through its paces this weekend.

[@nVuFilms]

@@Hawaiian_lightning 💯

[@Godssupersoldier777]

“Let me show you!” Great video!

[@nVuFilms]

Lol you watch the whole 25 mins in 5 mins ! 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏

[@Godssupersoldier777]

@@nVuFilmslol all your videos are great. But I had to comment to be one of the first to hopefully get a reply before all the other comments came in. I’m a big fan keep up the good work. BTW I ended up watching the whole video! 🤣

[@nVuFilms]

@Godssupersoldier777 thanks. I respond to 98% of comments ☝️ especially within the first month or 2

[@Godssupersoldier777]

@@nVuFilms awesome man thanks again!

[@nVuFilms]

@@Godssupersoldier777 💯

[@duvalpenny100]

Totally agree with you about how big the difference is between f2.8 vs f2. It's more noticeable than f2 vs f1.4

[@nVuFilms]

‼️‼️‼️

[@JaimeAndresMedia]

I just got mine, been playing with it, I also do a lot of client work (run&gun) at night and this seems like a logical choice, I wanted to upgrade my 24-70f2.8 sigma DGDN (v1) because the AF is horrible, and I wanted either this GM F2 lens or the 24-70 F2.8 GM, I was apprehensive to get it based on reviews from people that Sony sent it to prior to the actual release. But I am glad I got it, I agree 100% with your initial review here, I've taken the lens on two shoots already and it performs amazing. Most other KZbinrs were recommending to go with the F2.8 instead, but I am glad I spent a little more and got the F2. It is refreshing to see somebody review it without having the Sony brand giving them the lens, I probably watched at least 10 video reviews of this lens, and you are (finally) the first youtuber that actually bought the lens and gave a real-world review of it.

[@nVuFilms]

Thank you for watching. Appreciate your insight as well. 🙏

[@Kevr0]

Thanks man! That’s a way to put it! I’ve got nuts from carrying this 28 to 45 all day

[@nVuFilms]

@@Kevr0 lolll

[@akkarparkiamopas3401]

good review. Keep being an honest reviewer like that. very useful Thanks

[@nVuFilms]

@@akkarparkiamopas3401 💯

[@soumLimpaChao]

I too am a bokeh d-bag trash

[@nVuFilms]

@@soumLimpaChao 💯

[@EgillBjarki]

Great companions and very informative! Thanks allot for this one Vu, not just telling, but showing us. 28-70mm GM seems like a true "god tear" zoom for those that have the budget! I wonder how many 35-150mm users will be tempted to swap.

[@nVuFilms]

🙏

[@samcashelmedia]

Appreciate your videos 🙌 one of my fav tubedouchers

[@nVuFilms]

Thanks brother

[@frankfeng2701]

28-70 GM is such an optical achievement that it can replace 28-45 and 28-105 for the same price to be used on a1.

[@nVuFilms]

Basically

[@junglisttt]

Great video man, and good point on the 28-45 sigma with the TTartisan. I borrowed the 28-45 all of July from Sigma nordic and loved it. Might get that combo. Or 28-70 since i do a lot of street lowlight stuff. I aint GM’in that much these days but hopefully soon 💸💸

[@nVuFilms]

🤙

[@underratedmc]

Planning on traveling with the 24-50 f2.8 G, whats a good lens to pair it with? Would you recommend the 75 f/2 or another lens to cover that focal range?

[@nVuFilms]

75 f2 would be solid

[@storybookfilms944]

I am using a step down ring going from 86 to 82mm, and using my Nisi VND! Zero vigneting when shooting video even at 28mm brother!!!

[@nVuFilms]

@@storybookfilms944 cool

[@AWAShowme]

I don't currently "got money" me at the moment, but it appears to be a great one. I wonder how the image quality compares to the 24 - 70 options. Thanks for the content.

[@nVuFilms]

@@AWAShowme honestly.. image quality is going to be borderline Identical

[@AWAShowme]

@nVuFilms You know what, I agree. As you have said previously, many clients and the public can't usually tell the difference.

[@nVuFilms]

@AWAShowme only difference is bokeh. And that is subjective

[@DavidZhou]

Ready for a million videos on this lens 😂

[@nVuFilms]

@@DavidZhou I would need about a million videos to get enough ad rev to pay for part of it 😭😭😭

[@ChacoOutdoorsman]

Thanks for the video, very enlightening about the differences between the aperture’s. Cracked me up with the ending and the GM got money 💰 😂

[@nVuFilms]

Lol

[@maggnet4829]

What is your thought on rocking a combo of the Sigma 28-45 and a second body with an 85mm f1.4 (or even f1.2) instead of the 28-70 on only one body?

[@nVuFilms]

I rather have 28+70 one body

[@tobiahtayo5149]

I similarly enjoyed the 28-45mm f1.8 and I do like the less perfect background render more but i've just replaced it with the Sony. It feels quite a bit lighter because of the balance and the extra range and much improved AF are well worth it.

[@nVuFilms]

👍👍👍

[@LxrdSwift]

I 100% knew you were gonna get it😂 I did the same. There’s no other options like this. If sigma made an equivalent I wouldn’t even make look at a GM. But you know…in two weeks sigma will finally release this at $1600 and I’ll be like…should seen that coming.

[@nVuFilms]

@@LxrdSwift Sigma gonna release $1600 24-105 f/1.4 and comes with free dust as well.

[@TW-iu9zy]

… great comparison. 👍 as a journalist this lens is a no brainer for all kind of indoor and outdoor shootings. Preorder it at realease day and got it two weeks ago. Since day one it turn my a9 III into a fixed lens camera. 😏

[@nVuFilms]

💯☝️

[@AstroSquid]

I would love to see a comparison of the Sony 28-70 f2 with the Tamron 35-150mm f2-f2.8. My thoughts are I have a full frame 24mp Sony a7c i, and a aspc 24mp Sony, and I like to swap lensed between the two to get more lens options per lens, it's like each lens is a different lens switching from full frame to apsc. I.E. on my A6600, The Tamron is a 52-225mm lens with the same bokeh characteristics as the full frame. So, I can put the Sigma 28-45 on the full frame and the Tamron on the apsc and have a full range of 28 f1.8 to 225 at 2.8 with the cross over of f2 at 60mm on the apsc. This works because both of my cameras are 24mp... Which dates me but I like that image size to work with in terms of storage.

[@dleise]

TT 75mm the dark horse, but incredible. Love this lens.

[@nVuFilms]

It's a great little lens. Although mine has some big specs of dirt inside

[@nyambe]

First KZbinr that gets correctly the price of gear outside US. Yes!!! 😂

[@nVuFilms]

@@nyambe roughly 🤷‍♂️

[@alpenfoxvideo7255]

just went and bought the 28-70 f/2. Coming from a GM primes set, I want to forego the hassle of swapping lenses on some jobs.

[@kingdom001_]

People deal with f4 lenses because not every shot needs to have shallow focus. I have a similar lens needs to you so I love the new 28-70 f2 for pro work but for travel and family I instead prefer the 20-70 f4 because f4 is enough and it has a great range while being small. I found that range more useful than f2.8 in those circumstances.

[@nVuFilms]

@@kingdom001_ I see. Because I gotta stay close to my family. I'm generally wider. So I got 16-25 and 24-50. I never found a need to get closer. If I was satisfied with f4. I might as well just film on something even smaller like APSC sized for travel. No disrespect, F4 at medium range looks like cellphone imo. Might as well leave my camera at home Reference of how I film family stuff kzbin.info/www/bejne/oZDKpmuidppoabs

[@stkuj]

I might have missed it, but did you review the Sigma 28-105?

[@nVuFilms]

No I didn't

[@paulgero]

Very helpful.

[@nVuFilms]

@@paulgero ☝️☝️☝️

[@paulgero]

@@nVuFilmsproblem is though that now I think I have to get the lens!!! 😂😂

[@nVuFilms]

Links in description lol ​@@paulgero

[@coffeetimefun]

What filters you using these days? Those the NISI?

[@coffeetimefun]

Yep I’m the tool who asked the question before watching the video 😅

[@nVuFilms]

@@coffeetimefun for the 2870 I have to use nisi

[@nVuFilms]

@@coffeetimefun lolol

[@nVuFilms]

@@coffeetimefun helps the algorithm bro! Lol

[@SePark]

Can’t wait till I see you use this for wedding films. 2025 gonna be bokehlicious.

[@nVuFilms]

All 3 of the weddings 💀

[@robinprobyn1971]

Shame Sony zooms the wrong way round , thats NG for anyone coming from ENG or Cine lenses , which is quite a few folks these days in the doc / corporate video market. ie Burano and even Venice are native E mount, it's one of the reasons I like Sigma zooms. If Sony want to get the higher end "Hybrid " market .. fx6/9 ,Burano they should change the zoom direction to film industry standard , stills guys won't care either way.

[@LensofWyant]

If I didn’t get the sigma deez nuts 28-45 I would have gotten the gm, only plus to the sigma really is the internal zoom. Congrats!

[@nVuFilms]

@@LensofWyant sigma does have a nice look to it for those who notice. I love the signs lens 🔥

[@ryan3.082]

Lost it at “if you’re a weak piece of trash” 😂

[@nVuFilms]

@@ryan3.082 lol

[@troywalt4834]

Good review, thank you i had completely forgotten that sigma DN stands for deez nuts. 3600 euros in europe, please tamron or sigma just make it one quarter of the price. very interesting when you said there is a much bigger difference between f2 and f2.8 than f1.4 and f1.8 and i couldn't agree more.

[@nVuFilms]

@@troywalt4834 probably will

[@CucNguyen-lb1gk]

Myemteo ❤

[@AstroSquid]

Great comparison video. I feel the pull for the Sony, it's a great lens, but my wallet says nooooo.

[@WhoIsJonHarris]

I really like this trash video. Having the flexibility of going up to 70mm is worth the price hands down in my opinion. You’ve convinced me with your KZbin shilling douchery.

[@nVuFilms]

Yessir. 💀

[@darrienmccoy592]

82-86 step up will work

[@nVuFilms]

Vignette

[@LxrdSwift]

I 100% knew you were gonna get it😂 I did the same. definitely worth it for the time you have and if you will use it for work and if you sell lenses then it won't feel like paying 3k. Except for your wallet. But you know…it be like that.

[@nVuFilms]

@@LxrdSwift you Got Money 💰

[@AWAShowme]

7:13 jesus! 😂😂

[@nVuFilms]

My Lord and Savior 🙏✝️

[@thesummerprojectvids]

"I am a bokeh dbag trash" lmao

[@nVuFilms]

Lol

[@cbflazaro]

i have the sigma. only has a defect. zooms the wrong way around

[@mostlymessingabout]

*versus*

[@Adreno23421]

It only took 6 years for Sony to release their own f2 lens, finally it`s out. And now Canon has their own 28-70 f2.8 IS for 1099, great image quality throughout the whole range for a decent price, and not even 500 grams. As always, Sony is trailing behind. It sucks that RF mount does not have any AF third party lenses. Shame Sony colors suck ballz compared to Canon. And it`s also a shame that there is no cheap FF Sony camera. There is no perfect system.

[@nVuFilms]

Sony has 28-105 f/2.8 from sigma. Colors are subjective and if you shooting sooc you are a noob. Sony zve1 is $1,800. A7III can be found for 1200. That is cheap and good.