Six bits of photography gear you should not buy

[@RickBebbington]

Anything you'd add to this list??

[@bizpixvegas7651]

Too many: 1. Cheapo ball heads. 2. Camera straps 3. Strobes 4. Legacy M42 lenses 5. Old, low capacity (below 500GB) hard drives 6. Flashlights - I get a three pack every time I am at Costco. Reason, they become useless once the batteries are corroded due to lack of use!!

[@RickBebbington]

@@bizpixvegas7651 all camera straps??!

[@luzr6613]

Insurance is the thing I avoid. Two reasons: 1. I appreciate the discipline of assessing my environment and responding accordingly, this in the knowledge that, should I get it wrong, it's all on me. 2. I feel no need to susidize others for their lack of awareness or carelessness. Does this cost me? Yes... but it would either way and I prefer to own my actions, for better or worse.

[@kingghidorah8106]

Large aperture primes; from wide angle to telephoto; I believe that unless you specifically work with portraiture or as a BBC photographer you don't need a GM 85mm 1.4 II or a GM 600mm f4. My go to would be old prime lenses if one wants to, which is what I did, I bought a Minolta 50mm 1.7 and a Minolta 85mm 1.4, both are fantastic and have better transition at f-5,6-f10 than the lenses of today that basically delete anything else behind the focus point.

[@douglasadams1105]

Brand name only stuff …Really Right Stuff L bracket ($120) …Amazon special for the same camera ($40) with no real difference. It is a hunk of aluminum that allows me to use my camera in two orientations on my ball head. I would apply the same logic to ball heads and tripods (Gitzo!). There is always a great middle ground option if you don’t care what the name badge says. Second would be cheap screw on filters. The one area I choose to invest a little more money is my filters. I buy nice glass …I am not going to buy cheap filters. I prefer the Maven magnetic filters.

[@Bionictotquewrench]

I think that it’s really important that other people buy new cameras and lenses, that they don’t really use enough, and then in five years I can buy them at a substantial discount.

[@RickBebbington]

Haha!!! An excellent point!

[@philmtx3fr]

Good point !!!

[@missmerrily4830]

Definitely.... it's the only way I got started in photography! 👍

[@SuperMarioY]

Well, that's what marketing is all about isn't it. To convince you that unless you upgrade your life will practically have no meaning, and they are doing a damn good job by the looks of it.

[@notdisclosed7053]

To the comment “Lovely photo, you must have a good camera”, my response is usually along the lines of “Lovely dinner, you must have good saucepans”.

[@KishanSenLaskar]

Camera is more like ingredients, less like saucepan. 😂

[@terrygoyan]

I usually reply that Ernest Hemingway must have had a really good typewriter.

[@charleshuguley9323]

It's true, in a way. The photos modern cameras make possible would have required impossible technical abilities in earlier times. A sharp, perfectly focused image of a bird in flight, for instance, would have been a major tour de force for someone working with a manial focus, manual exposure camera. With a sophisticated modern camera, not such a big deal.

[@ingopaul1569]

Lovely comment, you must have a good keyboard.

[@charleshuguley9323]

@@ingopaul1569Your analogy actually argues against your point. Electronic keyboards make writing much faster, and it could be argued that this improves writing quality by expediting the capture of ideas. Copy and paste, for instance, save so much time compared to writing with a stylus. The same is true with insert and delete. This argument is even more compelling when applied to photography. Cameras with functions such as high fps, auto-exposure, auto-focus and eye focus make it possible for a competent photographer to consistently acquire images that would be impossible, or highly unlikely, using a camera lacking those features.

[@petetolman5713]

Great tube - Bags ! Hmm I have a few ! Conclusion the back bag is heavy to lug about & you do tend to fill every crevice - so I Store my gear in it @ home maybe if away pick goodies to take on the day . Favourite Bags are non photo bags For Street tourism etc small shoulder bag gorgeous 1 light SLR with 50mm & 24mm pancake & Canon G7 small pocket camera ( which generally lives in me pocket spare battery & card - For landscapes & general heavier higher Spec SLR 18 -135 zoom & maybe 70 -300 + KF magnetic filters ( in thier Pouch in a wide banded shoulder bag & wrist strap ( G7 still in pocket) tripod I carry on my belt. The above covers me for most things bothered fairly lite to carry & have room for a snack ! In separate compartment - so no crumbs etc on camera gear 😂

[@blisteringbooks2428]

I have been a professional photographer all my life, doing a lot of motorsport. When touting for business people would often say 'it's alright,my wife has a camera'. My reply was frequently 'I have a pair of scissors, it doesn't make me a dressmaker'.

[@sorenmelchior]

On Filters: Clear filters are advisable when photographing things that can damage your lens. Examples: 1. in a workshop where welding, sanding, and cutting take place. 2. Near a smelter where liquid metal is being poured, 3. High wind in deserts where blowing sand can scour optics. I have photographed in all three of these situations and have gotten pits or abrasions in the filters. Filters are a lot cheaper than a 2k to 3k lens. You get the idea.

[@maggnet4829]

That's the proper advice. Use them in extreme situations. Otherwise, use the lens hood.

[@RR_Zephy]

2nd to this. Over the years, it can damage the front element, heck day to day usage if you are not careful of the environment even dust n sand can get in unknowingly (nearby contruction sites particularly)

[@chrishall6364]

The UV filter on my lens, which broke, recently saved the lens from damage when it took a knock. I’ll be continuing to use such filters for that purpose!

[@Mike-ql7jg]

Me too. On my 50mm. I tripped and the filter smashed, but the lens is fine. You just never know what is around the corner.

[@kennantjessavi7648]

I have one on my TTartisan 27mil. It's my edc so i don't want to put on a lens cap. Much quicker when there's something i want to take, so I don't have the hassle taking off the lens cap.

[@TheBigBlueMarble]

How can you be sure the filter saved the lens? Filters are far more fragile than the lenses and there is a good chance the lens would have survived without the filter.

[@chrishall6364]

@@TheBigBlueMarblepossible, but the front element would definitely have been badly marked

[@iaincphotography6051]

@@TheBigBlueMarble A lens hood does a better job.

[@drzman6901]

I used to carry my photo equipment in a backpack when travelling. I got tired of sore backs and bought a well-known brand wheel case with a retractable handle. It fits in overhead storage on aircraft, and it has saved my back, and it reduces travel fatigue.

[@notetec1]

Finally a vid that reduces consuming.

[@sh8736]

Yes I’d add square space! It s expensive and not at all easy to use! Really sick of their sponsorship of every KZbinr.

[@marlenehazlehurst8666]

I was on Brighton beach last week and took a fall...thankfully i had the lens hood on my R5 & 24-105...it 100% did the job...my lens lived to snap another tale....now my knees?? They are still bruised....

[@RickBebbington]

I should have mentioned lens hoods - all the protection you need (and they're free with the lens!!). Hopefully you weren't too badly hurt.

[@GordonRunklePhoto]

My lens hoods are always attached, reversed in my bag, properly when I shoot. They not only protect lens (and threads!) but also unwanted extraneous light and glare - whether from sunlight or spot-lights. I can't endorse tossing a lens into a camera bag without the lens cap, either. Every bit of care matters and if you get a bit of grit in your bag, it can damage your front element, especially if you don't have a UV or NC filter on the front.

[@emerana]

someone on a recent social photo walk criticised my usually reversed lens hood. He said if you never use it why bother? Well, it takes up minimal space and when I do need it to rminimise lens flare, it's there

[@kramelbbiw]

​@@emerana re hoods and lens flare... they also tend to up the contrast too, even when there's no flare.

[@AndyBanner]

Rick, you perfectly illustrate how bags are entirely subjective. I have both sizes of the PD Everyday Back Pack and have no issue with comfort of either of them and love the way they can be used without even taking them off. With you on lens caps - lost mine years ago, they are not missed. Tripods and photography - Nigel will tell you how essential they are. Stabilisation isn't an issue, but framing is. Lock the framing with a tripod and wait for conditions. So many more reasons too. Be well.

[@RickBebbington]

That's interesting, I despise mine 😂 That's true about tripods - I guess that element is, again, subjective. It all comes down to how you shoot. Not sure I have that level of patience!!

[@Jonathantuba]

I also love my PD Everyday backpacks, I have both large and small. They are my perfect backpacks

[@virgilhawkins5680]

I've had the Nomatic McKinnon backpack for several years and I've found it to be a useful investment, even though it was chagrin-level expensive. I definitely haven't had any comfort issues with it. On the contrary, the straps design has ensured a supportive fit that I can wear all day. Note that I'm not advertising or encouraging anyone to buy it. Starting at $300, it's still really expensive.

[@hulabiker21]

Backpacks are designed to fit a specific body shape. So if it’s comfortable on you, it’s because it was designed to fit your body shape, in particular your width and slope of shoulders. You’ll see good hiking backpacks come in a variety of fits, including women specific fits. So the reason it was uncomfortable on the reviewer is…it wasn’t designed for his body shape. The designers of these photography equipment backpacks have definitely misunderstood what’s important in a backpack - comfort. Fit is principally achieved through the shape and placement of the shoulder straps, but also the shape of the back pad, and features like adjustable chest straps. People come in a variety of shapes and sizes, you can’t have one size fits all.

[@terrydear4038]

Tripod comments are right. I was in another state and was asked to video an event but hadn’t bought my tripod. I went to the local hardware store and found a Bosch tripod (for a level or theodolite) for around $49. Perfect. As you say if it had a photography tag it would have been at least double or more.

[@RickBebbington]

At least!!

[@monkeysnark7043]

One set of gear you need, shoes/boots, pants, a shirt, jacket depending on weather, and just forget the gadgets, and shoot, and compose, and shoot some more. One camera, one lens, and just keep repeating that with another lens. Think we get too caught up in gear, or latest gear, and not enough “ caught up in having fun shooting”. Why we became photographers, 🤔 thinking sometimes we forget the why, and dwell too much on the maybe. I remember why I got into it back during high school. Kept looking around and “seeing images” in my mind, which drove me crazy, till I went out and bought my first set of film camera gear. Then started meeting like minded individuals, and even started the photography club in my high school, developing my own film and B&W photos. Then my love for it grew from there, and I no longer felt crazy. Though as many, being a younging, was slightly caught up in gear after the first little while. Still have my heavy pro tripod (bloody thing, is heavy and massive, extending to almost 6’, and luging that around was nuts), and my F2 , and accessories from back then. Probably can blame that on my neighbour, as he had all the fancy Nikon gear ( he could afford it) and was both a good and bad influence for that. Oh well, live and learn from experiences. Cheers

[@scarcesense6449]

Careful with these tips, you might make some enemies. Rick: Anything with photography written on it incurs a crazy markup... Just like 'wedding' Wedding Photographers: He's onto us, get him!

[@RickBebbington]

Haha!! Having been a wedding photographer in the past, I mean except wedding photographers, obviously 😂

[@gscottfuller]

Great video. I think an exception to - it’s not the equipment, it’s the photographer - is wildlife. You need lots of megapixels for cropping in on distant subjects. You need great autofocus. You need focal length. And you get much better results with 20-30 FPS on moving subjects. Then, the artistry comes in in Lightroom!

[@RickBebbington]

You also need a lot of patience, which I think is why I leave wildlife to other!!

[@meatbyproducts]

I agree with everything except the tripod bit. Get a Sachtler tripod for video, and you will never want to go back. They start at $3000 USD and will last your lifetime and beyond. Don't get it to shoot landscapes, but it will change your life when shooting video. I will also push back on having a card reader, 1: almost always faster than your camera and 2: less wear and tear on your camera. Same for having a battery charger vs charging the battery in the camera. Nice to have but don't make it a habit.

[@jeffsmeraldo9374]

I would recommend checking out the refurbished gear on the manufacturer’s website when you do need to purchase a lens or camera body and wait for a sale on that site as well. Often you get the same warranty as a new one and the manufacturer did the refurbishment. All of my cameras I have owned, I have bought either used or refurbished. I have never had an issue and I have saved a lot of money. I agree about your point on bags that can be a money pit. I currently use a Thinktank travel style bag and it works great. I’ll keep it until it falls apart. Thanks for the good video!

[@RickBebbington]

That's true. All of my Fuji lenses are from their refurb site. Thanks!

[@StuBobsGhost]

The only one of those you won't convince me about is a UV filter, apart from really cheap ones. I used to work in a camera shop, so I've seen what repair to a front element can cost. Yes, a lot of the time a lens hood will save the lens, but you only need this to go wrong once. I'd rather keep that money to spend on petrol/ train tickets to get to a location. Each to their own though.

[@washingtonradio]

On lens, I find what stops me from buying the latest and greatest is looking at the shots I do take with my current gear, the shots I want to but can't take reliably, and the shots I almost never take.

[@RickBebbington]

Great way to look at it 👍🏻

[@MrCamcross]

On the bag front, I found an old padded projector bag, and created my own dividers with a thick $9 yoga matt and some superglue. Fiddly to make, and relatively inflexible, but its so much cheaper to diy. Could easily make one of those cube things this way as well.

[@RickBebbington]

Nice!

[@the_rat_run]

Camera bags, Grrr! I use 3, depending on circumstance. I have the big backpack that takes everything, but don't want to carry it further than out to the car! A little 10 Litre sling bag (lovely!) that takes a camera & 2 lenses, and a tatty (vintage look, unbranded) backpack with a cube in. The big bag stays in the car with all the bits (well hidden) and I just take the stuff I'm planning on using! (APS-C camera & lenses, so not too mighty) Another fun video, thanks!

[@RickBebbington]

Thanks!! I’m running 3 as well (or is it 4?!) and I still feel like there’s something missing… like something isn’t quite right. Need another, clearly 🙄😂

[@ashstubbings2603]

I found myself nodding vigorously when you got to the part about photography bags! It's like anything that is supposed to be built for purpose. All of a sudden you will find that the manufacturers of these things will start sticking 0's onto the price! I'm disabled and anything related to disability is just as bad! The electric wheelchair I use is a prime example. If I wasn't leasing it from motability I would have to pay £8,000 for it! By the way, you have a new subscriber! 😊😊

[@RickBebbington]

Thanks, appreciated. That's even worse if there's a premium for anything related to a disability - I'm pretty shocked at that if I'm honest (but not all that surprised).

[@gerrynelsonmusic]

I've been cheap and lazy for the most part. I used a camera pouch that I got for $1 ten years ago. I finally got a proper bag two years ago. The Wotancraft 10L Pilot. I love it and that's the only bag I have. I've been using a $30 Velbon tripod for the last 12 years but that's starting to break down. I'm afraid it might fail so it's time to finally get a proper tripod and head that won't break the bank!

[@dw.in.michigan]

As far as unnecessary (or perhaps just wrong) gear, I would say that one of the things that I think is the right idea, but is not made very well, is padded lens pouches. Although they were cheap, they were a complete waste of money. They were made based on older, more slender lens designs from the film era, and no one has bothered to update the physical specs. If they would update the sizes to match today's lenses, they would be great for using with a regular backpack. As for gear that has become indispensable for me, I've invested a bit of money into a system of quick change plates and receivers for tripod heads. Mine is by Leofoto, and I use the 60mm size - QS-60. If you have need of different tripod heads, this enables you to quickly and painlessly change them out, and they lock down tightly and securely. It's purely a convenience value-add, but very much worth it.

[@paullefko]

Large dedicated camera bags are not necessary. You’re really just carrying your fomo. Understand where you’re going and what you need for that day. That’s it!

[@tomburke5311]

Re: taking a tripod as carry-on. That’s fine as long as the airline has a generous carry-on allowance. A lot of the Middle Eastern and SE Asia airlines have a strict 7kg limit for carry-ons (coupled with a generous allowance for hold luggage). I’ve seen Emirates passengers having their carry-on bags weighed at Manchester, for example.

[@randolphcroft4212]

I bought the 70-200 F4 G years ago for my travel photography. I also got the 24-70 GM and the 16-35 GM. On other people's advice. I did get some great shots on the Euro-tour I got the gear for. No complaints. But over the last few years I learned to shoot differently and have recently purchased the Tamron 28-200 and that pretty much lives on the a7R3 full-time now. I'm getting close to just trading in the others, since I haven't used them since pre-COVID.

[@AndyCuthbert]

Great stuff, Rick. I would have to agreed with most. I only add a comment on to camera bags, as I often tell people unless you have a “standard torso,” what ever measurement that is, many backpack won’t fit a longer or shorter torso. I know that is one thing that has disappointed many buyer and pushes people towards the higher end bags with adjustable straps. As you said, once an item has “photography” put on it, it certainly increase the price and the perceived need.

[@RickBebbington]

Thanks Andy! That's an interesting thing to look out for, thanks for the tip 👍🏻

[@dw.in.michigan]

I have "cheap" camera backpack - not waterproof and not a premium brand. However, what I love about it is that I was able to adjust where the straps are attached on the bag. When I did a lot of backpacking, that feature was absolutely critical on any ruck sack you bought, to keep the weight properly distributed.

[@ArmyDr]

I am a firm believer in buying something expensive, but with good quality, but one. Like one good tripod, more expensive, but sturdy, same with bags. Use them with care as much as possible and when they are done , then buy next piece of gear.

[@Seagaltalk]

Doesn't work in a lot of cases. Quite often, the most expensive equipment won't last any longer or work any better than kit that is of a more moderate price.

[@MrCamcross]

@@ArmyDr I go with the cheapest thing possible the first time. If it breaks, replace with something higher quality. If it doesn't break, I either didn't use it, or it was good enough. Sadly, expensive is not the same as quality.

[@anupew3276]

1 tripod is not enought. One general use, sturdy tripod for general use, one small that can get really close to the ground for macro (still sturdy enought to fit macro rail on it).

[@alisonwilson9749]

@@anupew3276 For me, it's one heavy and high quality one for the studio when photographing paintings, and a cheap monopod for outdoors. I do have a couple of others I picked up/was given over the years which I use for studio lights.

[@Sutterjack]

I own a lot of camera bags and actually use them all - depends on the shoot. Sometimes I just want to carry one or two lens, cards and battery so hence a small bag. I agree on exotic lens except for me my 100mm macro is my favorite portrait lens. For my long telephoto lens urges I bought a used Sigma 150-600 for $500 and it works just fine. Thank you for hammering in the point about gear obsession! I still shoot with a 12 year old Canon 5D3 and it's still great - have my clients ever complained? Never

[@KyleByquist]

I love using my GoRuck GR2 (26L) as a camera bag; it's basically indestructible, super padded shoulder straps, great space & built-in pockets for internal organization, fits perfectly under (nearly) every airplane seat

[@rsearun2620]

Bag recommendation: Peak Design Messenger 13L. I've had this bag for 2 months, and it works very well as a briefcase, carry-on, qualifies as a personal item, and is a natural for day trips. It will take a 13" laptop, with room for a smallish body and 2 to 5 lenses. Like everyone, I've got too many bags, but this one is a delight.

[@JillCurtis-n2x]

I got rid of my 70-200 2.8, was too heavy, ever made it into the bag. Also, I recommend the 22L Thinktank Mindshift Rotation 180 bags, they are a game changer, even more so if combined with a capture clip on a shoulder strap.

[@don7117]

Good accessory would be a geared tripod head in place of a ball head. Yes, a bit bigger, but so much more precise, especially for macro work (but I prefer for whenever I am using a tripod). Another is a sling bag for light trips when you just need a camera and maybe a second lens and a spare battery.

[@RickBebbington]

I can see why some photographers would find that useful - I’ve actually never used one (one of the few things I’ve not convinced myself to buy!!). Love a sling bag, however it can be another potential minefield with added ‘photography’ tax!

[@don7117]

@RickBebbington if you decide to try a geared tripod head, I strongly recommend the one from Benro. Great price, well built, and precise.

[@ChrisBrogan]

Pointing back to your "The Camera Companies don't want you to know this" video reminded me just how great that video was. Truly cured a LOT of my GAS issues. Great post, Rick.

[@RickBebbington]

Thanks Chris. There are times when I need to watch that video back myself!

[@ethankim7979]

One thing i want to tell new photographers is to look into RENTING gear for shoots. Often, you make your money back through the shoot you're using it for

[@johnmclean7852]

A side note on bags, you fill the space you have. If you have a large bag you fill it with things you don’t always use. Your bag doesn’t need to carry all the gear you own. On a trip I’ll bring a second bag and rotate gear.

[@CeannFionn]

As a middle-aged newbie, still at the early stage of my journey and with a couple of pointless purchases under my belt, this is a great video and I’ve already reconsidered my ‘photography’ basket. Thank you.

[@pophilio]

I started photography as a hobby not to long ago. But I didnt want to spend alot of money. Bought a Canon 700d used with only 2200 shutter actuations for 200€. It needed a new battery for like 25€. The efs 18-55 is stm used for 70€, 55-250 is stm used for 250. SD card and reader for 25€ And an Amazon Basics camera backpack for 35€. So roughly 600€ in total. Of course it is not professional high end stuff but for a beginner like myself its more than enough.

[@michaelhenderson9412]

Mini table-top tripods and gorilla-pods. I have a couple. Had ‘em for years. Never used them. I just throw in my bean bag for those rare occasions.

[@RickBebbington]

I'd forgotten about my gorillapod graveyard!! I think I've got Casey Neistat to thank for that....

[@niallmorrissey3715]

The thing I'd suggest is a waste is megapixels - at least above a certain level. I have 40 or whatever, and honestly have discouraged friends who were thinking of upgrades for the sake of more than 20-odd. Their resolution works perfectly fine for me.

[@RickBebbington]

Oh god yes!! Not sure how I missed this but sort of alluded to it in the last point. To me, the mega pixel raise is insane.

[@ronpettitt6184]

I agree 100%with this video. Photographers are so taken with new gear it's ridiculous. We all know people who buy the newest snd shiniest camera more for bragging rights than need.

[@RickBebbington]

Yup. I'll admit, that was me. Not for bragging rights though, more to alleviate my crippling imposter syndrome 🫠

[@WritewheelUK]

I have two backpacks: medium and large. I also, like you, have inserts, but I leave cameras gear in them for home storage. I have an audio bag, a lighting bag, one for lenses, and one for camera bodies. I also have a big, solid case for my gimbal and a sort of catch-all bag for 'general' stuff: batteries, USB power pack, various wire bits and old mobile phone for remote operation. I pick which I need and drop them in the backpack. There's a little bit of sorting, but not much. Two things that you should have: a belt on the backpack, I find it much more comfortable, and a big box, remarkably big, to put in all the 'must have' camera gear you bought that turned out to be useless. You can then stuff it in the loft so as not to be confronted by your stupidity every day. I periodically empty the box and take it to a charity shop, which takes it with embarrassing gratitude and then sells it to someone who will later put it in their big box and stuff it in their loft. Thanks for the video.

[@RickBebbington]

You sound a lot better organised than me 😂 also I have 2 big boxes and a drawer. The drawer is for stuff I need more regularly than what is in the boxes. Weirdly though, I never use anything from the draw, but often find myself looking in it for something that I've lost 🤷🏻‍♂️

[@larryjordan9502]

The 1 area I tend to spend too much money on is finding the perfect camera bag. After spending so much money on multiple top branded bags, I too have come to the realization that there's no such thing as the "Perfect Bag". Each bag handles a specific task. Some bags will handle those tasks better than others. I now have a different concept with camera bags. I put them into 2 categories; Travel bags and hiking bags. Travel bags are larger and for when I must fly and want to store my equipment into a single bag as a carry on item. My hiking bag can be smaller where my camera rig is either in my hand or mounted to my body and the bag is carrying additional accessories, food, water and clothing. Once I separated the two uses I make more economical choices with camera bags. There are times when I travel with two bags to properly cover both categories.

[@Hirsutechin]

Bags - most of them are made to carry camera gear and nowt else. I did a long walk last summer with my old bag, trying to include food, water and tripod and it wasn't fun to carry. I got a Lowepro Flipside Trek 450 since then which is better and more comfortable, but could still use more room for food, water and extra clothing: I'm waiting to see how it does on next year's long walks. At least it was used, so not a fortune.

[@Windsurfingaddict]

I feel lucky, used my phone for last ten years and after five years of looking at reviews bought a barely used camera that’s been out 4 yrs so half the price than when first came out, and bought used older lens, one cheap camera bag, one good quality used tripod for Astro and saved thousands. Personally I like to keep everything in great condition as its resale value and the fact a lot of people like me look for mint used gear at the right price as if I decide to sell it all I’m not loosing out much.

[@ПітерАндрійХенфілдКолісник]

Good evening. I am a professional photographer from Kyiv Ukraine and in April 2022 I brought my family to the UK. In Ukraine I shoot models for agencies and fashion companies or I build portfolios for models. I do portraiture so these are my job. For myself I shoot landscape, city scape, some architectural and street photography. I am right now refocusing on my photography. I brought all my kit with me. A lot of strobes speed lights soft boes stands RGB LED lights etc which of course I need for my paid work. I am a Sony FE shooter with 3 bodies and I have 22 lenses. The reason I have a lot of kit is because my photography is split into different genres and therefore I need different things for them. On example. For fashion and shooting models I use lenses with 1.4 apertures (35mm 50mm 85mm) and 135mm F1.8 plus a Tamron 70 to 180 F2.8 plus all the lights etc. For landscapes I use mainly zooms and I can go from 17 to 500mm with what I have but I do use some wide angle primes too. For myself I think that if you are focused on 1 genre then yes it is possible to scale down and by the way I do agree with you on many points. When I shoot models/portraiture/fashion shoots I use 2 cameras. One on a tripod and one hand held. I usually drive to location shoots but if I need to walk a little way I use a trolley. In this genre you need a lot of gear. The other genres I shoot for myself I take what I need because I have already surveyed the area. Now interestingly I did look at that 70 to 200mm that you have and decided on the Tamron 70 to 180mm F2.8. 1st I could not see the difference in image quality in the real world 2nd I hate white lenses because it draws attention to yourself 3rd the price was stupid compared to the Tamron and the 20mm difference at the long end well just move with your legs and re frame, its cheaper. By the way that Tamron lens is fantastic. Camera bags. Yes a difficult topic. Took me a longtime to find the closest bag to ideal for me. The bag I have found that suits me is the Tenba Axis 32 litre. It is so good I now have 2 because I need 2. I usually put a huge amount of thought into equipment that I buy and in Kyiv I use to borrow/rent then decide if on example the lens or body is suitable because I have a good friend that works in a camera store. I buy bodies and lenses from a company online called E-infinity because they are way cheaper than a shop and I recommend this company as I have bought all my Sony bodies and lenses and Tamron lenses from there. Never there has been an issue. There are 2 lenses that I have bought that get little use and they are they Sony 90mm macro and the Tamron 150 to 500mm but when you need them you got them. Yes I agree that grad filters are something I would not buy. NDs and polarisers are a must have. Tripods I think are important. In Kyiv I loved riding my bike with a backpack and a light travel tripod because on a bike you can go almost everywhere and you see more than in a car. I also have a medium sturdy tripod for landscapes on the go and 2 more sturdy which I used for photoshoots. Cheap tripods are a waste of time but so are very expensive tripods and you are right to say somewhere between is the best.

[@philipwilson1620]

Hi. Was that the Tamron 150-600mm??

[@ПітерАндрійХенфілдКолісник]

@@philipwilson1620 Good evening. Yes the Tamron 150 to 500mm F5 to 6.7. Excellent lens. Not a lens I use often but I do use. I shot a fantastic pano at 480mm with it on a tripod. 2 rows of 6 photos that is 12 in total. Excellent sharp photos that I stiched together in Luminar Neo.

[@raymondludlow5970]

I never use camera bag mine is simply a cheap backpack you become less of a target as well when ya bag looks like shit

[@RickBebbington]

That's true!!

[@GordonRunklePhoto]

Being less of a target has become very important; I often do this myself. 👍

[@avjake]

Regarding bags, I can recommend the LowePro Flipside 200. Probably the happiest I've ever been with a bag. Space is limited, tho. Also, the 70-200 2.8 is probably my most valuable lens when shooting candids at events. Then again, the 70-180 2.8 which is half the price would do very much the same thing.

[@richardsaunders9326]

Agree completely with your assessments. In fact, I am quite surprised to find someone who thinks as closely as I do. Especially about not needing protective stuff any more. I also just put my camera and lens into my bag and don't bother with lens cap or protective bags. Thanks for the great common-sense video!

[@SuperRegency]

I recommend a good quality sling if you use a heavy zoom lens on your camera. My $85.- strap is perfect for my Tamron G2 150-600 model. And it prevents back aches.

[@paulk2257]

Interesting to hear your point of view. I suspect many (most) photographers will not agree with a lot of your comments. But you’re certainly entitled to offer them.

[@martinblizard1882]

Very interesting and of course I agree. I modified a standard back pack for my cameras. It now sits on my chest and is easily accessible and does not knock into things in shops as well as being harder to steal from. I also use a large "bum bag" that takes a camera and a lens. Very convenient. I learnt many years ago that if you wanted to improve your pictures get a better lense rather than a more expensive camera. I have many good pics from a 6 MP camera and I currently use a Fujifilm X Pro1. I might upgrade to an X Pro2 soon. Buy the camera that is good enough for what you are capable of when you are a Hoby Photographer. I feel the same way as you with try pods. They get in the way, are difficult to carry round and cost too much or are too flimsy.

[@S3mj0n]

Tripod is a good point. I had bad GAS about buying a tripod and looked at some in the 200-300 range. One day after i came back from a hike i looked at my photos and i realised that a tripod would not have seen any use for these photos. For camera bag i bought a used Pgytech Onemo 25l (the first version) and it works well and is comfortable.

[@Mr_Glenn]

9:32 I agree for the most part, but not entirely. Let me explain: The camera could play a big role in Dynamic range and background blur. Compare a full-frame to a micro 4/3rds. Yes a micro 4/3rds sensor can be great, but full-frame looks better for most shots.

[@RickBebbington]

It depends on the setting, but for what I do, I'm not sure there's much in it. Especially given the sizes that I publish and print at. Of all my recent images, I'm not sure many people could say which I shot on a Full frame and which I shot on a crop. Never used MFT though so maybe that's more of a difference

[@jamesnicholson9780]

There isn’t. I print A3 size from my five-year-old micro four thirds camera. If it’s a good photo no one cares what sensor size it is. And yes I have a camera with a larger sensor but I like the Panasonic better. I can use a Sony A7 IV from work any time I want but I like the Panny better and so I take better pictures with it.

[@libertyvilleguy2903]

Agree 100% on the camera bags - finding one that’s just right is impossible. I have bags that are too big, too small - I’m hard to please.

[@blackritchie8]

For camera bags I think the best choice is a good trekking or military pack with clamshell opening + a camera insert inside. Brands like Mystery Ranch, Tasmanian Tiger etc. Better load carrying capacity, lower base weight, more flexibility and generally better price/quality ratio

[@RickBebbington]

Great tips 👍🏻

[@leopoflexpostdigital]

My first Camera was an old rangefinder my Dad gave me when when I was 5, then a Zenit E, for years I only had these camera's with a standard 50ish mm lens. I still think going out with minimal kit and lenses forces you to concentrate more on composition and impact

[@dominicwroblewski5832]

I learned a long time ago to only buy used camera gear. New is not necessarily better. My favorite camera is the Nikon D300, 16 years old and enables me to craft some wonderful images that I think are better than the ones I get from My newer D7100. A great photograph is 90% photographer and 10% camera, & lenses.

[@danielx555]

Realistically speaking, I use a monopod far more often than I use a tripod when I'm outside of the house.

[@alisonwilson9749]

I sometimes use a monopod outdoors when doing horses with long, heavy lenses. Much more mobile than a tripod- which is a safety issue for me too.

[@zerotonine807]

I started last year with my first Camera (Fujifilm XS-20) and i am so glad that i didnt invest more for bigger and more advanced sensors which brings more extra costs etc. For myself i think it took me one year to learn how to handle the camera, all functions etc. and the Photos are great! Now i invest in lenses only to have a good choice between zoom and fixed focal lenghts. The learning curve is really steep, there is so much to discover. Never missed any extra gear so far. I think the most important is to be able to use your Camera right and knowing it well. The rest is some cherry on the top which doesnt make you a better photographer.

[@M2008tw]

Thanks for uploading. Fortunately, I haven't been too crazy in my camera purchases. My first tripod was a Sachtler tripod with Flowtech - yes, it was expensive, but luckily, I could get an exhibition model for a slightly better price. It was worth it, and I still have it. For a long time, I had a Canon 5D Mark iii for taking pictures and a Blackmagic 4k pocket with a speed booster for film. I have sold it. Instead, I now have an R5C Canon and rent if it is a larger production or hire a cinematographer. A few weeks ago, I needed to shoot a few pictures but didn't have my camera at hand, so I just had to pull out my 5D, and it was just a pleasure to shoot it, and the customer was happy. We're a little too busy chasing the new. But when I see productions, many still use older models.

[@libertyvilleguy2903]

Agree on the new camera thing. Very much diminishing marginal returns. Odds are the camera you have is perfectly fine. The one thing I’ll say in favor of a new camera every 7 years or so: I shoot volleyball, and the newer cameras have come a very long way in terms of their speed and accuracy of auto-focus. This makes a very big difference for fast-moving sports photography. But for the landscapes I shoot - a ten year old camera takes the same photos as a new one.

[@neilpetch]

Hi Rick. With the bags for my everyday camera. I moved away from a normal backpack and move to a sling bag and it helps to keep your camera out to reduce the weight on your shoulder still enough room for little bits you'll need

[@RickBebbington]

I'm with you on the Neil - I have a sling bag too but for its size and functionality, it was so overpriced!! I do like it though...

[@neilpetch]

Yeah there are, I agree with you on the price. But like you said it's the whole camera thing

[@user-pg5rt7ju4f]

Backpacks are the most silly & stupid thing to carry (if & when u r shooting) in a city over 8M; even in the field/hills u have to drop them on wet/snowy grounds to get at or change anything. The only time they are good is when u r walking. I've been looking for bags for a while. U don't want to pay in blood for sth. like a Billingham which is not that practical anyway (& still use cotton straps?). One of the bags I still have was bought some decades ago when back to the little old college town called Boston; I paid $13 or 16 for this dirty & blk sooty (prob. fire/water damaged) but looked otherwise ok. After washed & dried , it's a fine tough low (9"?) & longish bag. Still looking for some old Domke type & whatever its name in various sizes, & at least one easy for packing away an a7n w/ vertical/power grip & a lens attached. A good camera bag is hard to find & should NOT cost more than a pair of real leather shoes. On the last few 15-hr intern'l flights, in a laptop backpack I had o.c. a 15.6" , a couple of bigger lenses, batteries, chargers , cards & cords, a small body, papers & a small book. At least I don't carry rolls of heavy films any more , & one time I also carry a 100' bulk loader & some reusable cartridges. Never a camera bpk ! In the 90's I managed to carry a Bogen ( l-t agent for Manfrotto) monopod onboard. Haven't tried & shouldn't after 9xx. A nail-clipper is also wea__p_on.

[@emerana]

sling bags are often problematic for the female shape - I despise them. Backpacks only for me

[@raventhc8847]

Some types of photos are impossible to shoot without a tripod though. I kinda hate carrying it but there is no other option.

[@RickBebbington]

True. All comes down to what you are shooting.

[@ricknicholson5894]

What's even more exciting is buying cameras in great shape, low shutter count, used but lightly. Same with lenses.

[@RickBebbington]

Totally agree. My basically new X-T4 with a 3k shutter count only cost me about £750!

[@tsdelaney]

Good, thought-provoking subject. Thanks!

[@ethankim7979]

I feel you on tripods. For most people, ibis or ois is more than enough. Ive managed to a couple 2-4 second exposures with an olympus em1 mkii. All of them super sharp

[@RickBebbington]

Exactly. You need good IBIS though, and it's better on newer cameras, which ruins my final point 😂

[@jamesnicholson9780]

If you want good ibis, get a micro four thirds camera.

[@brianmckeever5280]

You asked...My bag is the WNDR PRVKE LITE in tan. Darker colors wouldn't get scuffed going through security conveyor belts, but it's great backpack: Lightweight, expands, fits neatly in airplane overheads. I think buying new kit to increase your enjoyment of photography is worth considering. I can't tell you how much more I enjoy photography since I switched to rugged MFT gear I can just use, not worry about. I took a tripod to Morocco for 16 days and didn't even take it out of my bag. I don't use any filters, but I do use lens caps. More please!

[@curtisallan2853]

But camera bags and UV filters are both sub-$100 items that can save you the expense of replacing a $1k lens or $2k camera body. Tripods are necessary for slow shutter speed photography, timelapses, using long lenses, etc. I appreciate the idea of not over-buying but I think most of these items you listed are actually incredibly useful things to have

[@martink8080]

I think the point is that if you have a real good reason to use any of those items (and often) then they become must haves. If you use it maybe once, meh, perhaps not.

[@judem429]

“You must have a really good camera.” I’ve heard that sooo many times. “Yes I do. It’s so good I don’t even have to take it out of the bag.”

[@GTR00016]

Camera bag recommendation: think tank backlight. A perfect bag.

[@mordenohare2550]

Agree. I have 2 different sizes of this bag for different systems. They are great.

[@GTR00016]

@@mordenohare2550 my biggest issue with it is feeling like i need several sizes lol

[@geoffkirby5433]

Rick, no nonsense sensible advice, I was just about to purchase that very Sony lens, but was not quite sure about it, I am now keeping the cash for something else.

[@RickBebbington]

Cheers Geoff.mIt's one that needs a lot of use to justify IMO. Might sell mine for a Leica 😅

[@stevenbamford5245]

I use a tripod for property photography and long exposure photography, I use my macro lense for product photography. And my 70-200 lense for events, photography is one of those things where we are all different in our needs and styles. To make money from photography we have to diversify, and with that comes various bits of kit, it would be nice just to be in one genre and tailor your kit for that specifically.

[@astralshore]

A tip: many of the more popular camera bags have cheap knockoffs. Yes, they’re somewhat crap. But I use them for the purpose of trying out the designs. I’ve done this successfully with a Lowepro Flipside 400. I found that the overall design worked for me, so I bought the real thing. It’s obviously a lot better quality, but it wears/functions the same. I know the brands hate the knockoffs, but it this case, they netted them a sale.

[@RickBebbington]

That's a great tip. Can these mainly be found on Jeff's mega-site?

[@libertyvilleguy2903]

The suggestion to rent lenses is a good one. Especially the big telephotos - rent, unless your a big wildlife photographer.

[@robinschaeffer6252]

If you find yourself cleaning dust off the front of your lens in the field with your shirt tail, a UV filter might be a cheap and replaceable way to avoid fine scratches on the front element. It can be easily removed when you need all the sharpness the lens can deliver. My gear is not that expensive - I'd rather buy a decent case than pay an insurance premium. As "Bionic" stated, buying used gear may be one of the best ways to save money.

[@toobviewer]

It was an exceptional situation but I once had an assignment photographing helicopters landing and taking off in the bush. Flying grit and very high winds. Next day I threw away the uv protective filter they were so damaged.

[@alexvanschaik4753]

When on safaris I really think that the newer camera's (like the R5) with good autofocus is a real step foreward. I get much more keepers and I am able to shoot scenes that I would otherwise miss because of too much time needed to focus. That said, I don't think of upgrading to the R5 II or similar. This R5 is indeed good enough.

[@DubberCorby]

I have a few bags depending on the situation. If I need a large amount of gear, I take my Lowepro ProTactic BP 450 AW II bag. If I need only a few lenses I go with an eiken Yellowstone backpack which is almost always loaded with my basic kit.

[@RickBebbington]

I used to use that bag and loved it for a time, I just thought it just wasn't great for carrying anything else as it was just one big pocket.

[@Sqeezy3]

Even thouh the newest of the newest isn't necessary, I want a second body, so I don't have to switch lenses and I know I can save money on getting a current or older camera, but I will wait and buy the A7V as the second body, makes sense for me.

[@user-pg5rt7ju4f]

What will be on a7v , global shutter most people don't need? a LCD screen like a rich brother's, some feature from a6700 & a9 ? I know my 2.5 yr old a7iv will be good for another 8 full yrs. Ever since the earliest electronic (film) SLR cameras days (I can't say the same about all- mechanicals) I've been over-paying for stuff I don't use. Can hardly recall how many few times I used auto. These days, some videos, AF w/ mirrorless (not full time) w/ Auto ISO. Auto iso is So Liberating! My "most reckless" days w/ XP1/ 2 were long over. I grew up on Agfachromes (DIN18)=asa=iso50, the only thing a kid could afford to shoot often (proc. & return postage included) using fixed focals (called primes these days by many "subprimes") to compose w/ feet as tightly as to the teeth. I had some (really) kind words to iso-Monks & iso-100 gurus in some other channel somewhere (don't remember where!). Use of cheap but good TTartisans & my m-mounts(other than the 1.5 crop) on a6 series bodies solves the battery problems too. Manu-lenses don't suck power. These small a6's rigs (running auto-iso) are (almost) like (/ feel like) cheap digital rf-L's on steroid! There is still auto-Aperture for those who prefer. No more spending on big-old-L's (incl. Pan-Lum too?), on the other hand the 5-yr old 1"-wonder sony rx100 vii is selling for $1300. gone up? tempting?

[@Sqeezy3]

@@user-pg5rt7ju4f I'd be fine with another A7IV as well, but what are you so upset about. Why are you telling me about the entire camera gear history? Is it really that bad that I want to wait for a newer camera to be released? Why would people not like a global shutter, doubt it will have one btw, but I'd like a global shutter, which would be really useful.

[@Bassbarbie]

A friend scratched her front element when a bramble brushed against her lens - it poked inside the lens hood and had a good rummage around. I mostly don't use filters and I'm more careful when walking now but I will put filters on at the beach when photographing windsurfing.

[@georgesealy4706]

A graduated ND filter is essential for video. Since the shutter speed is locked in, and I want to use the attributes of a fast lens, a graduated ND filter is the only way to finely adjust the exposure. I find them convenient and easy to use.

[@RickBebbington]

Do you mean a variable ND? If so, I totally agree!!! But I've never used a graduated ND in over 8 years of making videos

[@georgesealy4706]

@@RickBebbington Sorry, YES, I meant variable ND. Got my terms mixed up. LOL.

[@sethmacdonald5725]

The biggest jump I noticed on camera upgrade wasn't maxxum 9000->a77, but a77->a77ii. I think another piece of kit I've bought and rarely use is a flash. Doubt they'll ever get used beyond once every 2-3 years with me

[@RickBebbington]

I used to use my flash loads (weddings, studio shoots etc) but I'm not sure I'd even know how to use it now!

[@mattbibbings]

For camera bag recommendations, if anyone is considering the Evoc capture hip pack then save yourself as ton with the Lowepro Space Case 7, some pick and pluck foam and gaffer tape.

[@RickBebbington]

Noted!! Hopefully this helps someone!

[@Fstop5.6]

Photography is about light, timing and execution. It has nothing to do with equipment. I’ve spent lots of money on equipment that make things a little easier but ultimately you need vision. Ansel Adams equipment was primitive by today’s standards yet his work is legendary. I learn one of Adams secrets for processing B&W film, from someone who knew him and used it in school earning a “you certainly mastered the medium,” from the teacher, someone who didn’t think what I was attempting would even work.

[@RiccardoPareschi]

Nice advices. In the last 12 years I've bought only one camera body switching from apsc to full frame, and I've planned to stay with that body for many, many years (I'm not a pro). Tripod same path, the first was cheap the second a light and professional tripod. My main lens is a 24-70 (in kit with my full frame) a 70-300 and a wonderful 35mm. I love old lenses too, they are cheap and really interesting for creative shots. For macro I've a 50mm with broken autofocus, four M42 lens and now I'm in searching of an 85mm. Filters I've bought a couple on NDG but in that momento of my life I was living on a island near Africa, lot of shots to the ocean and very bright skyt. Now, back to Italy, I prefer bracketing and better composition.

[@paulmaschak5267]

I agree on grad filters as they they knock down everything and don’t take into account image subjects - much better off in post - I went to internal clip ND filters (yup kase) which really helped me out exposing - clip packs are also so much cheaper than 112mm and “smaller/easier” to deal with.

[@RickBebbington]

I've never tried the internal ones, but have been tempted to give them a go.

[@paulmaschak5267]

@@RickBebbington $800 for the 3 ND (8, 64, 1000) 112mm vs. $200 for same set saves a heck of a lot of money.

[@mondotv4216]

I love my 70 - 200 f2.8 MkII and I even bought a doubler for it on a recent trip to Africa. I checked out renting but renting (and carrying) something like a 600mm prime was just too expensive. For wildlife that 400mm reach was good enough. And the 70- 200 on it's own I use all the time as a second or third closeup angle in an interview situation, for shooting sports etc. The MkII (along with the 24-70 F2.8 GM MkII) are my go to lenses for 95% of what I do (which is mostly video). The other lens which I still think is a bargain is the 24-105 F4. Overall I don't mind spending money on lenses. They tend to hold their value pretty well if you look after them.

[@RickBebbington]

True, they hold value much better than the boxes we attach them to! I'm not against the 70-200 at all, I've just realised it doesn't fit what I want to shoot - I'm not sure that's always a consideration when a photographer is deep into GAS!

[@solitude.5283]

It's fair to say that you don't need certain accessories if you have a newer camera but then you can't say that you don't need a newer camera. I have a camera with literally no image stabilization. In some cases I have to use a tripod even though I don't like using them.

[@gvz1538]

Great video; I agree on all counts, especially tripods, camera bags, and lenses!! 24mm to 70mm is my go-to also, and I rarely go wider or longer. And don't get me started on camera bags and camera upgrades 🙂

[@RickBebbington]

I’ve started - rant away 😂

[@reverton77]

I use slimbag, easy to carry and I still my back pack fro other stuffs

[@Snatchapic]

I agree with quite a lot of your statements, but lenses that you might not need is very much depending on your styles of photography. I love my macro, I do a lot of Macro photography, but others might never need it, same for other lenses. I have a 10 mm that I do not use that often, but in some situations it got me pictures I would otherwise not have been able to get and so it has a place in my bag. Photography bags, a never ending story and again very specific to what you carry around. I finally arrived at the Wandrd Prvke bags. Bought one used to try them out, fell instantly in love and now have two in different sizes and will sell all the other ones I have. I like that they are not solely for camera equipment, I like that I can easily store jackets, food and whatever I might need on tour and that the rolltop can be rolled up to minimal size if you do not carry anything else. They do not look like photography bags and are wonderful to carry, even if I stick in 12 kg of equipment (only on flights when everything needs to be in the bag, otherwise way too heavy). My best buy of equipment beside camera and lenses was the capture clip, to have my camera at hand on my shoulderstrap of the backpack, hands free when needed, camera in hand in no time. Tripods, yeah I have two and I need them for my macro work, long lenses and long exposures, otherwise they stay at home.

[@mikebartow9415]

My first bag was a Manfroto Pro Light. It was sufficient internally for storage but the outside was bothersome. The shoulder straps were not curved and very much the same on either side so they would flip when putting the bag on. The sternum strap rode too high was in my neck most of the time. The one other problem that annoyed me the most was the hip belt. I backpacked a lot and was use to a nice wide hip belt that rode properly. The Manfroto was so narrow that it just would not sit on my hip. I tried the pack on in the store but without any weight in it. My current bag is the Mindshift Pro Light 40 L. I have had this for 4 years now and all of the previous bag problems are gone. Some essential gear that I believe is a must is cleaning cloths ( mcrifiber), lens wipes, sensor cleaning swabs and appropriate fluid and a blower.

[@RickBebbington]

I had a Manfroto bag about 6-7 years ago and I honestly think it's the worst bag I've owned!! So uncomfortable and it pinched my lower back - far from ideal. Yes to the cleaning stuff, but just search 'microfibre cloths' rather the 'camera cleaning cloths' and you'll save some money (aforementioned 'photography tax'!!)

[@mikebartow9415]

@@RickBebbington auto supply part stores sell microfiber in packs. When it comes down to it their probably a $1 or less each.

[@nevvanclarke9225]

Tripods do one thing ...keep the camera still...the falcam tree root is fantastic. The best bag is the Campagnon German made one. I own it. German made quality 👌.I shoot professionally and wouldn't use anything else! Campagnon! Bracketing doesn't work with a 1/2 second seascapes...ocean moves and you end up with mush. Plus Australian sun is way brighter than English drab weather. It's hot here! Renting is not possible here in Australia. Cameras are fun....why not buy them. Life is short.

[@RickBebbington]

Cheers for the suggestions. Surely for bracketing seascapes you just use one shot for the sea/rock and one for the sky? Essentially just doing what a filter would do? Cameras are fun, but the industry makes people believe they'll get better shots with newer cameras and that's just not true.

[@22_muhamadbagashandoyo_xku53]

In my experience of being in this field for a while buy tripod if only you photo some long exposure photo, wedding, or do some video by yourself. If you just started photography use the money to buy an tripod to buy a good memory card not a cheap one. It will be good for a long run

[@wubbsy]

The nice thing about lens pouches is that they are a very compact and comfortable way to carry a lens. Especially larger telephoto lenses. And I rather carry just the little lens pouch than a full on backpack. And they’re like 20-30€. About the camera bags. I like that I can open the entire back and have my lenses nicely laid out. Very nice and mine cost only 60€ and is quite roomy. So for traveling I pack my backpack but for actually going out shooting I mostly just take the lens pouch. I don’t think they’re essentials but they make going out more pleasant. And at least for me they were easily worth the money.

[@Matt7R]

I have an a6400 and I absolutely love it. I have considered changing to a FF camera for low light performance but hard to justify the cost (for the camera itself and also needing to get a few new lenses because I’m dialled in for a crop sensor right now with only prime lenses). Am I likely to see a sizeable improvement or is the change going to be disappointing for the cost?

[@RickBebbington]

I honestly think it's disappointing for the cost (but I'll likely get hammered for this!). Obviously it depends what you shoot. if you shoot stuff that needs a fast shutter speed in low light (weddings for example) then it probably would be worth it. I own a full frame Sony A7RV. My most used camera is my crop sensor Fuji X-T4 😂

[@GregDungan]

I love my Vanguard bags. They are amazingly affordable, well built, and comfortable.