Comparison - Tomb Raider: The Last Revelation DC vs PS1

[@BiggusWeeabus]

Dreamcast Resolution + Playstation colors = Perfection

[@mccalejk2]

It's the way it was captured. The Dreamcast version looked a helluva lot better than this.

[@panospsoh]

Just play the ps1 version to an emulator with upscale internal resolution and graphic filters and it will be a perfection. I suggest duckstation emulator for pc and fpse emulator with opengl hd plugin for android. Both have setting for fix shaking polygons.

[@XnmXrXsX]

@@panospsoh or simply play the dreamcast version

[@laracroftvideos]

Dreamcast: Better overall resolution, high resolution textures, fog, Lara casts a real time shadow that reflects her movement. The colors are awfully washed out though.

[@GameshinbunTV]

The DC version looks so dull in comparison to the psx version. I'm going to play the psx version, for sure. Expecially playing it on a CRT TV

[@OnyxNemesis]

The Dreamcast was amazing inside the tombs, but crappy outside

[@dextersbeard3472]

@@GameshinbunTV the Dreamcast version is definitely the definitive version in terms of graphics. I'm sure if you use the Kaico HDMI adapter (or some other good VGA to HDMI adapter)and run it through an mClassic it will enhance the colors and deepen the contrast. I think unless you have a PC that Is the best way to experience this game.

[@dolbyprologicii]

this is due to volumetric fog effect. same thing happens if you play on pc.

[@anthonycerulli1423]

I feel like the Dreamcast always had issues with washer out colors.

[@klodek14]

Technically, the DC version is better, but the vibrancy of the ps1 version is more appealing. Besides, I think pixelated textures often look better in old-school 3d games. They create an illusion of additional detail.

[@paulolameiras861]

I partly agree, that's why i always prefered PS1 visuals over N64 ones. I thought i was the only ony thinking like that. But unlike N64, Dreamcast offered a massive jump over the PS1. Much more polygons, soft yet detailed textures, higher resolution, etc.

[@embracerodusk2537]

They just didn't take the DC ports far enough. Minimal effort, which made it strange playing PS1 games on a system that could produce things like Soul Calibur & Quake 3 Arena.

[@Robert-nl3fd]

It has pixelated charm

[@toprak3479]

PS1 has two things over DC: Vibrancy and nostalgia

[@epicon6]

klodek14 I own both versions and the DC version is muuuuucb better and fits the graphics perfectly. Ps1 version isn’t bad at all but i’ve played it with DC 15 times and with PS1 only two times because i didn’t get the same experience. In many cases too much HD in a pixellated world makes kt worse but the DC and PC versions are just right.

[@Mr_x_19922]

underwater looks so good and realistic in the dreamcast version

[@josericardobernardino3500]

I had a dreamcast and it was such an amazing console. It was my favourite! Such an underrated console

[@beatsmithx1090]

the amount of Nostalgia I get when I see an old console is infinite

[@harsesishoktar9386]

The Dreamcast was capable of far more than this. This is just a shoddy Port of the ps1 version I'm sure.

[@FF_81_]

Doctor Attitude 2 What??? Games like Soul Calibur, Resident Evil Code Veronica, Shemue and others prove that you are wrong, what you say is completely false and wrong. Neither PS2 would be able to run Halo.

[@nikolasaslanis6852]

harsesis hok,tar dremcast for his age was graphic mirakle it have graphics of some medium or goud pc

[@Essu_]

This was an enhanced port of the PC version.

[@Psevdonim123]

Yeah, It is. PS1 was a target platform so it's not surprising... Graphically DC version is better but it has many bugs that present in the pc version which were fixed in the latter PS versions and somehow performance on DC is worse than on PS (probably because of WinCE)

[@grg-productions]

Was closer to PC

[@masterlee1988]

PS1 version has better colors, but Dreamcast version is better overall technically.

[@Mr_x_19922]

the dreamcast version is better overall, but it's a bit dark imo, but i think you can change the gamma and the contrast.

[@marcocinquini1985]

I understand that PSX colors are eye candy, and, I like that, but for a dusty enclosed ambient during a cloudy day, the DC version makes more sense, and with some extra effects, like dust pairing on the air, and the drops when Lara leaves the water pools, are really a nice touch, and makes the DC version not deserve a thumbs down.

[@RandomGBystander]

Just wanted to point out that the water droplets are present on PS1, just harder to see at the lowered resolution. Much more obvious on emulators at higher res.

[@RedVGFox]

Kill me, but I like the PlayStation version more because of the colors.

[@piast_kolodziej]

Me too. More vibrant. Strange move to make colors faded on DC :(

[@AmericaTheEnslaved]

might just be whatever cables he's using, or the color options on the tv set, but yeah, i have the dreamcast version, and it is kinda flat looking, and i had to turn the brightness pretty much all the way up on my tv because the dark parts in caves are so dark that you can't see a thing.

[@is5000]

colors can be adjusted.

[@cybermx8896]

But ps1 do that just out of the box!!!!!!!!!!!! wow!!!!!!!!!!

[@giovaniouropreto]

More colorful means more artificial. Dreamcast is more natural looking

[@Noobelli]

The graphics in general are much better on Dreamcast, but the colors are a lot better on Playstation.

[@saintblades]

I had both PS1 & Dreamcast 😅 I never thought to play it on the DC, it looks so much better!

[@Mr_x_19922]

1:34 you can see the Lara's shadow in the dc version, in the psx there's no shadow

[@Anothergames]

Wow, just noticed it. Nice.

[@ibcrazysumtimes]

thats how you do did it back in the day

[@LyRaLex]

PS1 had shadows but they were simple dark circles. Often called "blob shadows" in PC games graphic settings.

[@wuffy8006]

The shadow was there, but no where near as good in the ps1 version. DC had much better effects and it showed. Better hardware usually has better graphics.

[@Danny-87]

This Video makes me cry. I miss this time where Videogames was good.

[@alejandrosandoval2665]

If you guys still use CRT on your Dreamcast, here's how to make it colorful like the PlayStation. This also works on HDTV's. 01. Go to the menu on your TV. 02. You'll see picture or somethin' 03. If you see COLOR use left to turn. 04. TURN IT UP ALL THE WAY! 05. Your TV and Dreamcast will be colorful as the PlayStation!!!!

[@Erkkade]

Awesome tip! :)

[@alejandrosandoval2665]

Erkkade I know right! It worked for me. I also have VGA but I only use it for when I really want best quality cause for now, I care about colors.

[@alejandrosandoval2665]

done mansion How do you even connect a PS1 to an Xbox ONE?

[@bubbGameon]

you use a hdmi converter for ps1 and then plug it in to the xbox one hdmi in port.

[@mcfcxx9849]

Dreamcast with the PS1 colours would be mint

[@christianvance1614]

Damn I didn’t realize the Dreamcast looked so good

[@Speed4Runs]

Wow, I didn't know old classics had a remaster! That's the first time I see such a thing... Never seen old lara with realtime shadows - amazing!

[@Speed4Runs]

@@soulsphere9242 Considering the PC port and PS1 versions were practically the same. (except for small things like water colour, some gameplay changes, and much better textures), the Dreamcast version was really far above to the original. Surely, nowadays we have OpenLara for PC which brings about an open source, modern gen engine; but, officially speaking, Dreamcast was really impressive - something that happened with Soul Reaver as well

[@Speed4Runs]

@@soulsphere9242 btw, now that I think about it, TR & TR2 did get an official remaster (mostly resolution and textures) for Andoird... Shame it's just for Android tho

[@Speed4Runs]

@@soulsphere9242 I've watched the video and yes, just as I said, the Dreamcast version has better post processing (oh yeah, another difference I forgot to mention between PS1 and PC) and, especially, Lara casting dynamic shadows, whilst the PC version _doesn't_. PC has obviously better textures, but the Dreamcast really has some amazing lighting effects (PC seems even glitched at some points?) I agree that the PC version of TR2 looks tons better than the PS1 version, but that's just mesh quality and textures which I assume is what you meant even in this case anyways

[@ClownNaround]

Dreamcast: natural light Real time shadows Smoother textures Higher frame rate Camera has slightly more of a view Sun glare Renders backgrounds for next room/area Ps1 Vibrant colors Charming polygonal graphics Original unedited backgrounds (some areas have been changed, look and you’ll see) Items are highlighted aiding in view of detail No mist effect No dive animation

[@Klona13]

what do you mean by PS1 having no dive animation? PS1 had the entire move set.

[@nekroneko]

There was definitely a dive animation. They just didn't execute it for the PS1 version here.

[@Klona13]

@@nekroneko I literally just played the PS1 version and it has a swandive. Girl, when was the last time you played the PS1 version? LOL The person playing in the video just forgot to use it.

[@nekroneko]

@@Klona13 I didn't disagree with you, I just stated that in the video they didn't do it on the PS1 version. I know, because I played both versions way back in the day.

[@ricowolfdog7524]

The way the game is made is fitting for the PS1. The Dreamcast for sure uses an higher resolution, texture filtering and overall new lights and shadings, but the way this Tomb Raider game works fits more for the PS1

[@godzilla7391]

RaxelMaestro yeah. Looked like a quick port to me. Dreamcast launched and a lot of 3rd party companies were trying to cash in quickly on it imo.

[@waxdoe115]

@@godzilla7391 exactly no love and ca whatsoever

[@benwyatt7619]

If DC was brighter and more colourful, then it would be a winner

[@bensmith5288]

Its the winner anyway .. clearly ... dont be silly

[@benwyatt7619]

@@bensmith5288 Each to their own

[@is5000]

I really like those volumetric effects on dreamcast.

[@mikeschmitz537]

Hands down, this intro gives me pleasure and anxiety at the same time :D really good work

[@r.t1576]

As much I'm a PSX fan, but I would choose DC version since it's more realistic-like.

[@Owen_plays_music1049]

Exactly

[@somedude6647]

The Dreamcast version looks more realistic but this game seems to be very stylized around the PS1’s hardware

[@FartSeeReal]

Tomb Raider was a great game... Jolie did an excellent job as her...

[@Erkkade]

Fart See I liked the first Tomb Raider movie, but the second one... not so much. Jolie did an excellent job as Lara and I can't think of anyone else playing her. But these old TR games are great! :)

[@FartSeeReal]

Erkkade yeah...that's the story with most movies.... what's ur next video on?

[@Erkkade]

Fart See Not sure yet. What would you like to see next? :)

[@FartSeeReal]

Erkkade what are my choices? :)... Btw, since I commented on yours, can u comment on several of mine? And sub?

[@Erkkade]

Fart See Just commented and subscribed to your channel. Your videos are just... crazy! :) Choices for my next comparison video is Spider-Man, Indiana Jones and the Emperor's Tomb, Flat-out, Hidden & Dangerous, Project: Snowblind, Quake III: Arena, Tomb Raider: Chronicles, GTA: III, Vice City, San Andreas.

[@s727r]

Early days for the DC, so colours aren't as nice, but defo smoother. I loved them both, still got a DC in the attic, just needs the psu fixed.

[@foxythefox1951]

Dreamcast was underrated after all

[@AVEXentSUCKS]

Considering the baseline hardware for this game was the PC the PS1 version performs quite well.

[@DenisLiasis]

The Dreamcast of course looks the best. More realistic, subtle pallette, better resolution, better framerate, better shadows. BUT, the ps1 also has vivid colours and the game looks more like a game. I go for the Dreamcast because i like realism, but i bet that some people prefer the vivid colours

[@DUSTINODELLOFFICIAL]

So the PS1 version is a very technically accomplished game with nice graphics and fluid frame rate considering the machine it's on and, though gritty looking, is a bit more eye catching in brightness and color. The lack of texture filtering sort of fools the eye into it looking more detailed than it really is. The Dreamcast version looks like one of the many half-assed PS1 ports the DC got, looking fairly shitty for a DC game, soft interpolated textures and lacking contrast and color making it harder to actually see. Brilliant.

[@andyben87]

Agreed. They're the same game. The DC just got a higher resolution. No overhauls. Nothing more than a port.

[@baldbookgeek]

the dc port is based on the pc so looked very washed out

[@SaturnJap]

I own both versions since the good old days and I must say to definitely prefer the Ps1 version. The DC counterpart looks greyish, blurrred and flat. Also, the lighting is all wrong. One would expect far better textures on a Dreamcast port, yet they are often almost worse.The only notable thing is that pseudo bump map here and there.

[@victorfadel06]

I was playing the dreamcast port the other day, and you're right. The texture quality suffered a lot from compression, and it looks even worse than the ps1 original. I don't know how they managed to screw this up on a more powerful hardware.

[@baulretromx4375]

It´s pretty obvious this is one of the most mediocre games for Dreamcast. It´s sad how lazy companies dind't wan to make better looking games for Dreamcast, and they only made poor Play Station ports.

[@embracerodusk2537]

Yep, a lot of the PS1 ports on DC basically looked like N64 games instead of DC level titles. A game like TR4 probably could have looked better than Angel of Darkness on the PS2, if they had developed a true ground up DC version.

[@sdmayday]

@@embracerodusk2537 You know, Core didn't have time to do such things because they had to release a new game every year and it had to be a game designed with the psx in mind as that was the system that sold most copies of Tomb Raider. This one was portet from pc using windows ce which was known for poor performance but ease of use. At least Core Design could have added some extra texture detail. I still wonder how much vram was never used for no good reason. They could have went with four times higher resolution textures without any problems, but I assume they never had those to begin with. The next iteration of Tomb Raider was using a different api and performed a lot better.

[@johnbane1711]

Well... How do I say this.... I think the psone looks better most of the times. Yeah the textures are blocky and warp when the camera gets too close, but they look really blurry in the DC. Not to mention that for some reason, they completely dessaturated the colors in the DC version, to the point it makes the game look bland. The added special effects look nice tough, and underwater the visuals are gorgeous. For me, PSONE wins, but I will keep the PC version xD

[@johnbane1711]

+jesusdelmas No it's not fake, I had it too, so unless you had a different version than mine (I heard the pal versions are worse because of the lower FPS thing) you are just hating here for no reason (like the rest of youtube ._.). it's playing just like it did in my psone. If he was emulating, there would be texture flitering and anti-aliasing, like in the DC version, and yet the textures are blocky and the edges look like a saw.

[@Erkkade]

+jesusdelmas I can confirm that this is played on original PS1. And it's a PAL version, so it's 25 frames per second (50hz).

[@GalaxVerse]

You know you can emulate both of DC and Ps1 on PC and even on your phones right? And for free if you download their ROMs from any browser

[@waxonwaxoff727]

Defo smoother on the DC and the colours more vibrant on the PS. Comes down to what you prefer more.

[@bjraleigh1439]

quick port to dreamcast, debatable which is better looking. Obviously dreamcast on a technical level. SEGA should have at the very least made sure Lara Croft's model was a complete redo. She is the central focus of the picture at all times, so odd they didn't get her looking dc grade.

[@si4632]

So the dreamcast was more powerful than the playstation so when people say the dreamcast was underpowered on release I see what they mean as the dreamcast was released 4 years later which is an eternity in technology

[@doctorattitude2611]

I agree. The DC was quite a limited system when you think about it. As a big DC fan who has owned multiple games for it (also owned the PS1 and Saturn), the console was literally an upscaled PS1 when specs are taken into consideration. Most DC games had similar geometry to PS1 games, except the DC had much better textures (look at a game like "Kiss Psycho Circus" for Dreamcast compared to "Armorines" on PS1 or "Daikatana" on N64). This is because the DC had a 32-bit RISC and a 128-bit CPU, while the PS1 had 32-bit for both processors plus software rendering (bubbling and pixelating graphics). Even games designed for Windows 98 (like "Half-Life" and "Soldier Of Fortune") were pushing the DC to the limits (I've read comments from the developers), while the PS2 could run them without little effort. So don't expect the DC to run any COD or Halo games :P

[@retroboy-fh1ji]

Doctor Attitude 2 Half Life and Soldier of Fortune looked like a joke on DC compared to true FPS like Quake 3 Arena or Outrigger.

[@tiko8420]

So you are judging the system by shitty PSX ports? Just look at real Dreamcast games and say again it´s an upscaled PSX Dreamcast was almost as powerful as a PS2. In fact when PS2 launched back then, Dreamcast games looked better than their PS2 counterparts.

[@si4632]

@@tiko8420 i under estimated the dreamcast its as good as a ps2 im certainly no sonny fan obviously this was bad game to compare👍

[@si4632]

back in 1999 i was building my first pc never had a play station or dreamcast but after playing some dreamcast games with redream i can safely say the graphics were class easily rivalled some of the graphics cards of the time

[@RetroGamingX1]

Looks great in DC, is the best version! (DC>PC>PS1). BTW this game supports bump mapping in DC?

[@Erkkade]

+Darkness_Knight You are probably right. Had to check: www.tombraiderforums.com/showthread.php?t=202400

[@RetroGamingX1]

+Erkkade - Thanks for the link ;)

[@nediswierd5342]

When you remember that with the first game the Saturn version was considered the inferior one, and now Sega in the lead.

[@kazaloolovesgames]

Only a delusional person thinks that the PS1 version looks better. I love both systems but lets be real here, Dreamcast kills PS1 on the graphics front.

[@RIP19851]

The graphics look crappy now but playing them back then the graphics was awesome for the time. Don’t get me wrong this is just my opinion

[@Erkkade]

Check out our brand new erkkade.com website! From now on you can find all our comparison videos and gaming related articles in one address. What do ya think? Please leave a comment and remember to follow erkkade.com. :)

[@GamingPalooza]

Hmm... There is something about the PlayStation version that I actually like better. The textures are not filtered and it has more contrast. I am a Sega fanboy usually but this is the rare occasion.

[@KyanoAng3l0_Mtvtks]

I never knew this and Chronicles were released to the PS1. I thought they were released for the newer consoles. Got both on the Dreamcast. I do agree that the colors are better in the PS1.

[@retroboy-fh1ji]

Me gustaria saber porque en la página de IGN le dieron solo un 3 de 10 -_- . El juego se ve genial en Dreamcast , pero prefiero los graficos de la PS1 .Igualmente ambas versiones son excelentes.

[@МихаилНовохоров]

i love fog and this effect around water 2:30 🥰

[@turbopincher]

0:45 it's only I saw Freddy Krueger?

[@franciscagaray5480]

Turbo Pincher estás demente amigo

[@gokushkameha-ha-ha9344]

That intro made me subscribe

[@KleitomAntonioMachadodeSouza]

I had better the version of the Dreamcast than PlayStation, but the PlayStation was a good video game.

the ps version is much better at artistic department. more contrast, more vividness in color. technically the dc wins of course!

[@dr.cringe5045]

ps1 version looks very grity dark and pixilated, the dreamcast is brighter and a little bit less pixilated.

[@ferencssalvoski3721]

GameKing 2thousand I see PS1 more brighter than DC

[@ParadigmStages]

I am a PlayStation man,grew up with the PS1 only knew one older guy with a dreamcast and all I can say is that I am quite impressed.PlayStation version has better contrast and little more detail but Dreamcast is smooth.Looks like I will now be on the lookout for a Dreamcast on ebay! :D

[@Hellseeker1332]

TheParadigmStages impressed by the dc version? Really? This console was the first released "PS2, Gamecube, Xbox Generation" so this looks pretty dissapointning to me. Even it is a port, but I think u could expect a little bit more from a console which came out 4 years later and had better technology.

[@ZombifiedDuder]

Dreamcast wins from a technical perspective here... but PS1 wins in terms of style. I mean, just compare the fade-out transitions between scenes. On the PS1 the fades have a unique charm, while the DC version is just a standard fade-out and fade-in. This is just one example.

[@MO-tx3lk]

When you notice that the psx hardware was from 1994 and the dc hardware was from 1998 the psx do a good job

[@helenagoncalvesmariano2871]

Acho os 2 lindos, amo em

[@Kinsanth_]

DC sure has better lighting and shadows and even no 2d"noise" visible, which was quite obvious to see on the ps version. A shame, that dc never got its full potential

[@tubias21]

Dreamcast version is obviously better visually, but it looks more like a N64 game than a DC one. I bet they improved just the textures and the lighting effects, but mainteined the same polygon models of the PS1 version.

[@fabriciovega4215]

i think that the ps1 version looks more colorful because the dc port has only a few adventages and didn't use the full power of the 128-bit sega's machine. A shame because was a quick psx to dc port :(

[@frenchwithstef]

The version of Dreamcast is almost similar with the version from PC

[@Jack-pc9sp]

Dreamcast version is definitely the definitive version, zero comparison, unless your eyes are missing out of your sockets. If youre concerned about the color, just alter your gamma. My only critique is the reduced number of buttons on the Dreamcast controller leading to less precise control.

[@alexcastellani3789]

You can clearly see that the Dreamcast version is better

[@ThatOldSchoolMagic]

what people tend to forget or not know is that the Dreamcast belongs in the same Generation as that of the PS2,Xbox, and gamecube. The Saturn is with the ps1 and n64. i dont like comparisons between different generations because its pretty obvious one will have the edge over the other in terms of hardware. its like comparing the original super mario bros on NES to New super mario bros on the DS.

[@Erkkade]

Madara Senpai Why does it matter? We live in 2017 and I am just simply showing the difference between versions no matter what the platform is. You mean I can't do a comparison video of the same game in different versions just because they are from different generations? As you can see from the comments it is not so obvious that the newest generation is the best. So does this make this video useless? Btw this game is not even on Saturn or any other console.

[@ThatOldSchoolMagic]

im not controlling you or anything on wither you should make them or not thats up to you, im saying i dont like comparisons. theirs nothing wrong with that right? the main reason why is because most of them only bring Negativity and Bias to a lot of comment sections. We live in 2017 and people are still fighting and arguing over which versions is better even when the games were made almost 2 decade ago. look at a lot of VCDECIDE's videos especially a lot of the sega saturn videos. it gets pretty toxic because some people cant accept other's opinions. also this wasnt aimed at you, only to people that dont get that the hardwares were made at different times. you wouldn't believe how many people think the ps1 and dreamcast are in the same generations since a lot of ps1 and 64 games were brought to the DC as well as similar designs in that era. hope you understand a little better on how i feel, you have a great day now.

[@Erkkade]

Madara Senpai Thanks for opening your point of view. Comments on these videos can sometimes get a little rough but that's not a good reason to stop making them. These videos are here to help the audience whether they want to see which version to play or just simply satisfy their curiosity to see the graphical differences.

[@epires2]

Dreamcast have real-time shadows, but is darken, opaque. PlayStation version have better and vibrant colors.

[@nthansanz2402]

I know I'm late on this video but I'm 15 days I'm going to get the dreamcast because I want to play the tomb raider games, but I want to know if the tomb raider games for dreamcast really look like in this video or depends about the tv too??

[@Eszuran]

It looks amazing for a PS1 game.

[@limitslines9896]

Trying to decide between this for epsxe or redream , still dont know which one would look better in 1080p

[@cjbdntdis]

I only now been able to run Reicast on the Xbox series s and it runs now on it with no issue. I prefer this game graphically on Dreamcast, the PS1 isn't as adaptive the lighting seems more natural , dripping water effect is brilliant aswell ok dreamxast

[@jaygreenn92]

Dreamcast was always better than ps1 it damn near had ps2 graphics

[@tiffanylee3866]

The DC looks more realistic to me the ps1 version is just brighter. I. Biased towards the DC version because it's the system I played it on hehe

[@Tanubi]

This seems a little off. Hear me out. I'm currently running this on a standard Dreamcast with no mods, standard video cable. I'm also running this on a ps1, same setup. No special mods. Pure standard video cable. Connected to a TV. The Dreamcast has better colours and lighting effects compared to ps1. The models look less blocky and a little more detailed too. That's not to say the Dreamcast version doesn't have its faults as it does. Water and so on but on a standard set up I'm not getting these results like in the video. Also, Dreamcast doesn't display a narrowed window like above. Both ps1 and Dc seems to offer the same view. I can replicate the same look as above if I run a ps1 emulator though.

[@bud389]

PS1 has more color and contrast, DC has better lighting, but looks more washed-out.

[@Journeyofourlife436]

Dreamcast = E3 PS1 = Retail

[@coooolibri]

y

[@AJFuentes93]

PlayStation's camera is very choppy while sega is smoother, PlayStation's graphics were better in some aspects, likewise to sega. I think sega put more effort into their 3d graphics since 1 they've been around longer. 2. they do make arcade games for theme parks and such also, and it would probably depend on the developer a little bit as well.

[@SlavicUnionGaming]

i hate the sega key master i put the middle finger to for making that shit

[@SergiMedina]

Which has better FMV, with less compression artifacts and/or more resolution? It's impossible to tell just with the opening one... Thanks!

[@victorfadel06]

Dreamcast fmv's quality is between ps1 and pc ports.

[@SergiMedina]

@@victorfadel06 Thank you for the reply, though I think the PS1 is better, but it's also true I couldn't get access to the original Dreamcast files (yet), so...

[@skirmich]

Yeahhhhhh...... I dont miss the tank controls at all....

[@katewilliams4013]

Aside from the better lightning and shadows of the DC version this is *the same game* . I'm not at all surprised by all the people who told me they had an original Playstation back in 1999 and weren't too impressed by the Dreamcast that year.

[@WALDENSOFTWARE]

The Dreamcast version started looking more like Tomb Raider reboots, so it was weaker. Sega should have released this on the Saturn instead (once they got the TR license back).

[@vasili1207]

Put the dreamcast in vga mode

[@Sancheeeeeez]

Why the dreamcast is not in VGA mode? I play retro games quite often including DC with the correct setup and The Last Revelation looks much better than in this video.

[@31leoceara]

With this level of polygon complexity, the Dreamcast could and should run at 60 fps. Lazy port.

[@SomberTwilight_]

couldn't you essentially make the dreamcast as vibrant as the PlayStation 1 by just altering your TV settings?

[@jallvargas743]

So the dreamcast is superior but lacks lighting effects that the PS version has, so PS version has a lot of points on it's favor thanks to that.

[@normanroscher7545]

At least on a small screen the PS One version holds up surprisingly well. :-) On the other hand the DC version looks pretty bad compared to other Dreamcast titles. It does not even nearly use the console's capabilities to the full extent.

[@Dagoth_Ur_1]

Dreamcast version looks blurry and washed out, plus darker. Only good difference is lense flare and when Lara is standing still breathing or whatever, the pixels making her outline don't blink (no dithering?) A shame because look at Alone in the dark 4 the new nightmare on PS1 vs DC, huge difference. AOTD4 also looks good on PS2 but the brilliant horror music got completely fucked for some reason.

[@StigMug]

Dreamcast wins by a mile.

[@jonathaningram8157]

Tomb raider with a controller is so hard

[@dgino7049]

textures are the same ! You just have to run a psx emulator with high resolution and bilinear filtering, antialiasing, etc. to get almost the same display as dreamcast.

[@CplDwayneHicks11]

Controls needed better tighter tweaking for the Dreamcast Controller that is.

[@gradsgames]

I'm thinking about getting this on the Dreamcast, can anyone recommend?

[@davidquezada50]

nice there's shadows!

[@wilder9777]

Dreamcast more praphics and PlayStation more live

[@Reelreactions999]

I guess the real question is, real hardware or emulation?

[@LoserNO13]

Dremcast wins... but not by much honestly.

[@voidlt]

+Hating4AM what??

[@japyoo2248]

Frame rate the same?

[@alejandrosandoval2665]

Can you compare Rez? the Dreamcast and PS2 versions?

[@Erkkade]

No I can't. I don't own the Dreamcast version. But maybe I can compare PS2, Xbox 360 and PS4. Or even Dreamcast if I can get my hands on that game some day.

[@alejandrosandoval2665]

Erkkade ok.

[@retroboy-fh1ji]

Alejandro Sandoval DC version is better. Runs at more consistent frame rate (DC is stable 30 fps and PS2 is 60 fps with much slowdowns), higher resolution (480p vs upscaled 448i on PS2), better sound quality (DC has 64 audio channels and PS2 only 48 audio channels) and anti aliasing on DC. PS2 version shows why was hard to program a game in that early days of development.

[@alejandrosandoval2665]

Fabricio M Vega I wish the Dreamcast was more successful like at the range between GameCube and Xbox at least...

[@Owen_plays_music1049]

Wow the PS1 is so bright. I think it'san humiliation for the PS1, the DC looks WAY better !

[@MrNiceguy3210]

The graphics aren't much better to sell the Dreamcast as a next gen console at the time.