Reminds me to a P47 or F4U engine start. Takes a lot of explosions
@randomusername59975 жыл бұрын
It starts like a ww1 plane
@seemamishra25194 жыл бұрын
I have started loving the sound
@Jeremy_Moro4 жыл бұрын
The sound of starting piston engines is very cool. Plane: toof toof troof trootroo trtrtrrrtrtrrrrrrrrrr... Ppl: woooa that sounds cool!
@alec46724 жыл бұрын
Sounds like a Briggs and Stratton
@Soandsoguy6 жыл бұрын
You did several things really well. You were transparent about everything including mistakes or failures. Those are part of good engineering processes. Right? What I liked is that you didn't bore me. You have a real knack for teaching and the video contained just enough information to be thorough without boring. What a cool project too. Thanks.
@joeyporto24615 жыл бұрын
Miguel P I agree
@mixsmasher5 жыл бұрын
Miguel P Mate I agree
@GadgetAddict5 жыл бұрын
The potential energy from the compressed air is quite interesting. Especially considering the low weight.
@shatterpointgames4 жыл бұрын
Blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah i'm a fart head blah blah blah
@penidchristmas95774 жыл бұрын
@@shatterpointgames at least he knows what hes talking about you infertile plebian
@shatterpointgames4 жыл бұрын
@@penidchristmas9577 lol did you just call me infertile?
@penidchristmas95774 жыл бұрын
@@shatterpointgames perhaps, depends if you can read
@B1SCUTL0VER4 жыл бұрын
It actually has extremely low potential energy compared to the weight of any other fuel.
@pyromaniaxe11874 жыл бұрын
I love the fact that you have to spin the prop to get it going. It reminds me of the ww1 biplanes that were started that way.
@throttleblipsntwistedgrips19923 жыл бұрын
I've always liked the shotgun starts in planes like the F3F and FM-2. Short of that, watching an old Clerget or Gnome get spun over by hand is always cool.
@lr216433 жыл бұрын
Some people still start engines that way. For instance, you might do that on a Piper Cub or Taylorcraft that didn't have an electrical system offer after. Or for a homebuilt using a VW engine.
@lr216433 жыл бұрын
Of course, it can be really dangerous if not done right.
@sameera0ka035 жыл бұрын
Love how you don't sensor the failures. That's how science is done
@alexvirgo05 жыл бұрын
censor?
@Raonodar4 жыл бұрын
alex medel martinez edit out Edit: oh wait you were correcting him weren’t you?
@alexvirgo04 жыл бұрын
@@Raonodar trying to
@sylasviper7154 жыл бұрын
Well.. Technically all we do in science is the opposite.. sensor the failures and don't censor the failures.
@migrainuim4 жыл бұрын
@@sylasviper715 lmao
@bobbycorbin36 жыл бұрын
at 11:03 reminds me of cold starts of old engines
@Bepis136 жыл бұрын
I am never around them but it sounded so familiar for some reason
@Peanut3169.26 жыл бұрын
@@Bepis13 from cartoons if they had to drive a old car or other movies
@carelessgachastudio59055 жыл бұрын
bobbycorbin3 same
@elibenson86495 жыл бұрын
Give it choke!!
@imania42766 жыл бұрын
I'm really impressed that nobody has made the joke "so it's an airplane"
@topkek70036 жыл бұрын
I actually just made that joke before i scrolled down. Great minds think alike?
@boveyzheng18716 жыл бұрын
In British English it's spelt AEROplane
@SomeNot6 жыл бұрын
Bovey Zheng well they obviously don’t speak English
@KK-zw6bo6 жыл бұрын
Bovey Zheng yeah I know I was trying to put a comment on another video which aeroplane and it tried make me try airplane, and then I realised I was on the American English keyboard so I changed it
@houselightkell6 жыл бұрын
Imania shit, man!
@IonVladutu5 жыл бұрын
Can I mail you a portable air compressor?
@spagamoto5 жыл бұрын
That faulty startup sounds like an old warbird.
@prajwalpingali4 жыл бұрын
Exactly! Like an F4U or FW190
@sonicboom25355 жыл бұрын
What about filling that bottle up with dry ice, so that bottle will always be compressed
@johnnypaintsticks80275 жыл бұрын
That a great idea
@fachrybillal93265 жыл бұрын
@@MRA_3 fuck you!
@eternalfire12445 жыл бұрын
@@MRA_3 heavier but would also store more energy. The real problem would be over pressure and the cold affecting the integrity of the air tank.
@MRA_35 жыл бұрын
@@fachrybillal9326 why ?
@MRA_35 жыл бұрын
@@eternalfire1244 yeah that could also be the case
@danebrownawell60637 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much for taking the time to make the plane the right way. Some people are just clueless when I see these types of videos
@thejay89636 жыл бұрын
David Rude.
@markog19997 жыл бұрын
Hey Tom! Could you try putting something like Liquid nitrogen or Dry Ice+Hot water into the fuel tank? It could provide a continuous supply of pressurized gas as it evaporates, vastly increasing the volume of fuel and looking badass at the same time.
@Huhnmonster7 жыл бұрын
I really like the idea mate, wonder if the pressure would be enough though. I would be very interested to find out
@markog19997 жыл бұрын
With a strong enough container you could chuck in some dry ice, seal it and let it come to room temperature, which if cody's lab is anything to go by can generate ~1500 psi (if memory seves correctly). The question then is letting the pressure out slowly enough to not break apart the engine.
@petersatzer30107 жыл бұрын
That should be manageable with a pressure reducer. The more urgent question here is: Where to get a very light bottle and light equipment (suitable to be carried by an aircraft) that can hold 1500 psi.
@markog19997 жыл бұрын
I think you can get carbon fiber canisters designed for paintball and stuff. Anyway (technically) he could just scale the size of the aircraft to make the weight manageable (but I understand that might not be feasible). A more practical idea would be to fit a simple pressure release valve like you'd have in a heating boiler.
@markog19997 жыл бұрын
One potential problem is that the sheer volume of expanding gas could freeze up the engine, But i'm not sure if that would really happen on this scale
@cgrigg16 жыл бұрын
use mentos and coke for fuel Ram jet?
@paimonismyemergencyfood43325 жыл бұрын
It gonna way heavy for flying. They just get launch so fast
@fachrybillal93265 жыл бұрын
@@paimonismyemergencyfood4332 is crazyy!!!!!!!!
@frnq79874 жыл бұрын
Fachry Billal you mean he or that idea (that idea is trash because it would be really,REALLY hard to fly and the reason behind it is that It’s heavy and it would not even get in the air for long and coca cola doesnt make so much air pressure so it wouldn’t fly)
@Izard-wn6cc4 жыл бұрын
@@frnq7987 stfu please
@stonks70334 жыл бұрын
@@frnq7987 dont try to act smart we know
@ReliableControls5 жыл бұрын
THIS is what the engineering process looks like in reality!
@Jeremy_Moro4 жыл бұрын
Yea, everything comes with experimenting, experience and science.
@VascoCC955 жыл бұрын
I'm impressed with what you achieved, it's harder than it looks! I had an air pressure toy plane as a kid and I recognize the very same problem here: air leaks. As soon as you unplug the pump you can clearly hear a leak. I believe this an inevitable problem because even when you seal it perfectly, after a couple runs and impacts on the ground it will start leaking again.
@TheBangersnSmash7 жыл бұрын
I have used 150psi in them bottles I wonder if you can make a pressure regulator and run the motor at 60psi constant Fun to watch thanks
@realflow1007 жыл бұрын
YESSSSS lol!!!!!!!!!
@jackfrost10317 жыл бұрын
Maybe set up a servo as a throttle valve. And buy an air compressor.
@spongejacobw1237 жыл бұрын
there is a thing called a pressure regulator that does just that... i dont know if it would make it too heavy though...
@mikejarvis87327 жыл бұрын
Constant PSI via a pressure regulator and perhaps at the same time lowering the pressure and increasing the volume to the motor in combination with a larger propeller with a more aggressive pitch?
@bfournier18847 жыл бұрын
mechanical versions exist that are only a few pieces of metal plus springs, not that big
@_Munchy_5 жыл бұрын
2019 :air powered engine 2050:fart powered commercial boeing 787
@En_theo5 жыл бұрын
they do intend to use methane for rockets on Mars (for chemicals reasons cause the components are in the atmosphere there)... and methane is kinda fart, isn't it ?
@seer-91265 жыл бұрын
illusion 1000
@billniko93105 жыл бұрын
Boeing FP 787
@ProGaming-hg8un5 жыл бұрын
I can’t wait for that. You gunna make it? Just need the highly flammable methane gas and it would acc work just at huge cost of getting farts
@JayDillon-mm6yv5 жыл бұрын
If you store rotting corpses in the luggage compartment you can power your 787 using the methane. That would be a good movie too - - *Barf*
@Olivier-C7 жыл бұрын
You should use a neckstrap for your radio, just saying :)
@devilsoffspring55197 жыл бұрын
That's a great suggestion! That way he's not using up half his compressed air reaching for the radio! Just start, chuck it, and fly.
@shashankdegloorkar7 жыл бұрын
Also a ramp with powered spring to launch the plane. An electric pump to fill the air. I was getting exhausted just looking at him getting out of breath.
@icepl4net7 жыл бұрын
This is just plain stupid
@RemcoM0137 жыл бұрын
icepl4net Plabe stupid
@keithazzo7047 жыл бұрын
i
@alaric_4 жыл бұрын
10:30 I absolutely loved how the engine wouldn't start immediately when cold, just like normal IC-engines :D Pure gold that was!
@MatthewStauffer6 жыл бұрын
You need a damn lanyard for your controller. Lol
@stocane56287 жыл бұрын
The engine sound is so nice ^^
@erikhendrych1907 жыл бұрын
I don't wanna spoil 42 likes but I agree.
@sdani.5 жыл бұрын
it sounds like a gasoline motorcycle engine
@Aaron-ne4kr7 жыл бұрын
This takes me back to my first AirHogs plane, you would pump it up and start the prop and throw it, and it would fly in big circles overhead. I loved it as a kid. What kind of results do you think you would get if you tried to run a plane off a disposable CO2 cartridge? The kind that goes in BB guns. (I'm guessing there's not enough gas in there but what do I know.)
@tacticoolfuddery64976 жыл бұрын
I had the same one
@holdover886 жыл бұрын
Yup! And you could bend the fins to make it fly different ways. Lost two in the trees 😂
@lr216433 жыл бұрын
A company called Gasparin makes little CO2 engines, much smaller and lighter than this one. Generally, CO2 is likely to have much more pressure.
@devadershan7 жыл бұрын
why don't you use a transmitter strap????
@marckart667 жыл бұрын
I personally hate transmitter straps when using hand launched planes. I threw one of my wings once and while my hand was coming into grab the transmitter, I pulled the strap and it caught on the throttle. Straight to the ground, full throttle, big mess.
@daemn427 жыл бұрын
Marc, so don't do that with your hand. It's not the strap's fault. Just learn how to use it. It would have saved him so much time in this video.
@_Piers_7 жыл бұрын
Yeah, it was killing me watching him struggle, when there is such an easy solution.
@Kuritono_Fukukeru7 жыл бұрын
Yes, run run run tom!!! or use the strap of your taranis ;-D
@jirivorobel9427 жыл бұрын
People have been launching DLGs with Tx hung on their neck back in the 35MHz days, with those long rods sticking out. It's not hard.
@jasonpfeilsticker56925 жыл бұрын
Anyone remember AirHogs air powered free flight planes?
@gl4ndsberg5 жыл бұрын
I'm surprised he didn't mention it. They had a submarine too.
@WindWolfAlpha5 жыл бұрын
I had the onithopter, or whatever it was called. The one that had wings that flapped and functioned similarly to a bird's.
@leonmachin50365 жыл бұрын
Glad someone remembers.
@MisterTalkingMachine5 жыл бұрын
I remember my brother had one that was electric, and powered by a supercap back in the mid 2000's no less.
@Raonodar4 жыл бұрын
WindWolfAlpha I had that but it NEVER ONCE FLEW I followed every instruction too!
@joshualewis80774 жыл бұрын
5:40 It sounds like the *”BRRRRT”* of an A-10 Warthog
@User-xp4kl4 жыл бұрын
Have you ever wondered that if u hear the ”BRRRRT” you weren’t the target
@joshualewis80774 жыл бұрын
K K I have heard that before
@User-xp4kl4 жыл бұрын
Joshua Lewis yup i stealed it
@lllz98004 жыл бұрын
@@User-xp4kl stole*
@CTFreeman127 жыл бұрын
If the engine can take higher PSI it would be interesting to use a carbon fiber reinforced air tank that could take several hundred PSI....and perhaps a regulating valve could be placed between the tank and the engine. That might give a more reasonable flight time.
@wickedreelz50287 жыл бұрын
Even a 13ci carbon 4500psi tank would be FAR to heavy for a build like that. Far far far to heavy.
@maltekoch16327 жыл бұрын
rapping of the bottles should get a lot more pressure
@devilsoffspring55197 жыл бұрын
That's what I was thinking, a few thousand PSI and a servo-controlled throttle valve is a much better idea to me. It might be possible to produce (or buy) a small air tank good for very high pressures.
@cup_and_cone7 жыл бұрын
Way too heavy... It'd weigh more than the entire plane. A threaded C02 catridge might be a better idea, if you can make a light enough regulator.
@devilsoffspring55197 жыл бұрын
CO2 cartridges are expensive, compressed air is cheap :) BTW it doesn't matter if the air tank weighs more than the plane. It's typical in electric RC flying for a battery pack to weigh more than the plane, so it's fine. A very high pressure system requires an appropriate compressor, though, and a suitable regulator--ideally with throttle valve. That way, you just take off from the ground, and have a normal throttle on your radio.
@ReynardFuchsmann7 жыл бұрын
That is amusing, it has the same engine problems as early aircraft xD
@evaahh95846 жыл бұрын
Xortsa why is it that I only see people on the right with these photos?
@pedrolioni6 жыл бұрын
what was that?
@genericusername66446 жыл бұрын
Colobrinus With a side of cube Idk? Most people are on the right. I have still seen some on the left though.
@matrixarsmusicworkshop5615 жыл бұрын
What u guys
@GhalidiusTrident5 жыл бұрын
You would have to start it manually before you get in the plane by spinning the propellor
@andrewchurchley57057 жыл бұрын
A long fuselage, entirely of bottle sections,would have a larger energy to weight ratio, be very rigid in bending when pressurised and eliminate the existing thin fuselage
@liljohn118th5 жыл бұрын
"I've got the transmitter in position" *sets it down 6 feet behind him and then steps away even further while launching* Neat video, but that did make me chuckle.
@qianqifborinaga68754 жыл бұрын
Sounds like a real engine man. I like how you work hard for it.
@filipecb7 жыл бұрын
You need an assistant, definitely!
@Nightsaberban6 жыл бұрын
Mm! Then one could wind and throw it, and the other could steer the plane when its in the air. :)
@fillipeassis-almeida30706 жыл бұрын
Our names 😯
@freshlove79266 жыл бұрын
filipe brandao - and you need a boyfriend like me 😃
@gristlevonraben6 жыл бұрын
Awesome craft, Sir.
@jukkatakamaa72745 жыл бұрын
I was a bout to say the same !
@jsbarretto7 жыл бұрын
"Water rocket industry" I think I've found my dream job...
@cjthomp20057 жыл бұрын
Joshua Barretto lol, water rockets are pretty fun.
@pasindugunasekara49387 жыл бұрын
subscribe me
@ndesomas7 жыл бұрын
Joshua Barretto
@wawawiwa___6 жыл бұрын
PC Games 12 never
@maxprentice69627 жыл бұрын
Higher pressure-stiffer spring. Lower pressure-softer spring
@InfamousAMH6 жыл бұрын
Max Prentice noooo duuuuhhhhhhhh
@naiknaik88126 жыл бұрын
@@InfamousAMH why
@InfamousAMH6 жыл бұрын
hi there that’s simple af
@naiknaik88126 жыл бұрын
@@InfamousAMH why no cuz it's simple?
@the_reaper75835 жыл бұрын
@@InfamousAMH actually depending on witch valve/turbine system he is using is dependent on what type of spring he needs and he has a shitty 1 way ball valve witch it dose not let much air past quickly like a butterfly so it can need a stiffened spring for high pressure (for a butterfly)yes in most cases but could work just as well on a low intensity spring dew to his method on how his turbine is designed in witch is a crank with a simple piston and the air pressure pumps it round but not to 100% completion when downside so the spring dose what gravity would do so he dose not need a strong spring... and dont call hi there a idiot
@jameswo6 жыл бұрын
Great idea. Now the version 2.0
@alergu94784 жыл бұрын
That third trail at 6:23 is very touching. I expected it to fail but wanted it to work, and the fact it did work gave me goosebumps. Fantastic work!
@kunalchangoiwala74747 жыл бұрын
You are really Passionate about your project... I Salute you for that ☺️
@Aw4yed7 жыл бұрын
true
@carolynodell57207 жыл бұрын
Kunal Changoiwala g
@billyfishskin77356 жыл бұрын
Kunal Changoiwala I
@lkjslkdjfglkjsldkfjl6 жыл бұрын
I think you guys were too young when air hogs was out, air powered plane. Awesome times as a kid!
@snasher76376 жыл бұрын
Kunal Changoiwala is
@Kaleb064217 жыл бұрын
11:00 cold start?
@DashcamDriversGermany6 жыл бұрын
i think i have to build a 4 cylinder inline :D
@Fpvfreaky7 жыл бұрын
Probly need new spark plugs Good job man very clever bloke you👍🏽
@ChrisMisMYhandle7 жыл бұрын
^^
@markog19997 жыл бұрын
nah mate it's just the octane rating of his fuel... If he splashed out on proper kerosene he wouldn't get so much knocking.
@broccodoggo83637 жыл бұрын
well I did some research and found out that he needs to check his fuel line & his carborater
@aaronguenther35777 жыл бұрын
Stupid idiot s it's air powered
@markog19997 жыл бұрын
whooosh
@krolsky46084 жыл бұрын
I absolutely fell in love with your channel. I used to build planes like that long time ago and left that hobby 20 years in the past. Now that I see it, I've really missed this stuff. Best kind of hobby! I still have one original compressed air Air Hog motor in my storage and will never throw it out. Keep it up, this is great! Cheers
@DaSwagChamp-495 жыл бұрын
“It’s a bird!” “It’s a plane” “ITS SUPE-wait, no, it’s, it’s a plane”
@martinbruns38907 жыл бұрын
You should try to replace the airtank with a Co2 cartridge and see what happens =)
@realflow1007 жыл бұрын
It would just instantly go bang
@martinbruns38907 жыл бұрын
That might happen, haha. But I think it could be possible if the construction is changed for operating with higher pressure.
@evilutionltd7 жыл бұрын
Either too heavy or not enough gas.
@TheVifino7 жыл бұрын
Same idea, but with a regulator. Might be a bit heavy, but it'll run consistantly.
@aserta7 жыл бұрын
0.5 coke bottle with a CO2 dispenser drilled in the arse. Light, high pressure but with some expansion.
@timonix27 жыл бұрын
reminds me of a turbo prop. instead of using the jet engine to directly push the plane forward it drives a propeller doing most of the work. Maybe a design with a turbine would work better than a piston solution
@a647387 жыл бұрын
Exactly what I was thinking, turbine should be more efficient and simpler then air piston.
@DaT0nkee7 жыл бұрын
I thought its not working 3D printed, but actually it does. kzbin.info/www/bejne/bKO7ZausapKBrKc
@latinumbavariae6 жыл бұрын
DaT0nkee t
@abna57426 жыл бұрын
Im agree with you
@derpinbird11806 жыл бұрын
Turbines need to be north of about 150 horsepower before they become more efficient than a piston engine. The physics doesn't scale 100%, you can't build up the correct pressure differences without an astronomical rpm compared to a large turbine so they never end up efficient no matter how well you make it.
@Christoph24207 жыл бұрын
can you try making a multicylinder air engine?
@jamesburleson19167 жыл бұрын
I was just thinking a radial air powered engine would be really cool.
@Sheehy2237 жыл бұрын
I don't really think that would be efficient enough to justify it's size, single cylinder is probably the best way to go if he wants the thing to perform. I bet it would sound cool though.
@wickedreelz50287 жыл бұрын
My setup uses a 180 degree twin.. 550psi at 1.8 liters, regulated down to 105psi at take off then restricted to 55 to 60psi of line pressure after I gain a little alt.. at 55psi I get 3 minutes of powered flight however the CC of his single cyl engine is prolly 10 to 15% more then my twin. I went With a 180 degree twin due to reasons to long to type but moreless I could get a little more torque from the twin vs a single with a smaller total compression area. This system has very interesting properties that I fully plan to dig in to more. My setup (be it a LOT more complex then his proof of concept) provides powered flight for a length of time that is surprising to many. We could get much more flight time if we build A motor large enough to spin a much larger prop and a wing area large enough to provide enough low speed lift to carry a 13 to 20ci 4500psi bottle with a engine running at something like 80ish psi and consuming 300 to 400psi a minute from the bottle.. a few prototypes and I do believe that a plane with decent preformance and power would be able to be made and it wouldn't just be enough power to keep it in the air to find a thermal.
@hunterjackson8027 жыл бұрын
MaxTheKanuck a two cylinder motor would be more effective because the other cylinder would assist the other arranged on a drive shaft would create plenty of power.
@boostaddict_7 жыл бұрын
I'm going to try to build a multi cylinder version, the hardest part to figure out is the crankshaft. I may have an idea though. The rest is just finding an o ring the right size and getting the dimensions of it to build the engine around.
@fnersch33674 жыл бұрын
Hope your career is going well. I spent 47 glorious years in aerospace engineering and enjoyed every minute of it. You have a great future.
@luziaflone19516 жыл бұрын
This is great. I know we all can get cheap rc plane and it fly better and longer, but new ideas like this is always the beginning of something better.
@sheller1535 жыл бұрын
I’d love to see a seaplane where the fuselage and pontoons are the bottles connected with some plastic tubing, or a larger plane with extra bottles suspended under the wings!
@cartmanrlsusall7 жыл бұрын
Send this link and a file to the flitetest,channel and Peter stripol,I bet they would get a kick out of trying to make their own versions of your motor.
@fearcase907 жыл бұрын
cartmanrlsusall yeah dude that can be a great idea
@miniman31127 жыл бұрын
Pretty impressive results, the sound really sells it! I'm trying to wrap my head around the efficiency of the motor. Can it actually outperform using the air pressure in the bottle as a simple jet of air? My only guess would be more turbulences around the jet than with a propeller. That would still be kinetic energy as an undirectional chaotic kind of waste.
@stevecurtis10887 жыл бұрын
The problem with a jet would be that it would have to be very small so as not to drain the tank in a couple of seconds. That would mean you have a small very high velocity jet which wouldn't gain much traction and would be ineffecient in a much lower airspeed craft. It would be similar to putting a tiny high ptich propeller on which wouldn't work.
@jeremycaylor91515 жыл бұрын
Talking of 40k subs....now you're near 225k and you definitely deserve it. Well done!
@Toxicmastro6 жыл бұрын
This is a real AIRplane
@Fluburtur7 жыл бұрын
Now, make a v12 engine like that and power it with 6 bars of presure (or 87 psi)
@carolynmmitchell22407 жыл бұрын
Fluburtur 6 bars is alot of alcohol
@payne954257 жыл бұрын
Fill the plane from a 1lb propane camp stove bottle. On a cool day pressure will be just about right and no hand pumping required.
@Fluburtur7 жыл бұрын
if you fill it with propane why not make an internal combustion engine can't work too bad with 3d printed stuff I guess
@CanadasElite7 жыл бұрын
Maybe some auxiliary tanks would give it a good flight. Maybe a long, slim tank down the back or a tank inside the wings would give it enough juice for a 100m flight? The odd 50m you got already is pretty impressive. Also a big fan of your ebike series.
@sebincjose94746 жыл бұрын
I think you should try dry ice instead of compressed air. It may protect the piston from ceasing and keep it cool. May also produce long run time
@bohemod6 жыл бұрын
Well done mate. Great to see someone using their University Studies to teach others in a fun way. Reminds me a little of Engineering Explained channel. Keep up the good work!
@AndrewFRC1355 жыл бұрын
10:54 You've created the world's first aircraft powered by a hit-and-miss engine :)
@lobotm68285 жыл бұрын
Andrew Free Fire kkkkkk
@nimrodquimbus9127 жыл бұрын
I was thinking about the same thing. Use larger bottles for the Fuse, and smaller wing tanks, like a U2.
@brattmatt60175 жыл бұрын
Coolest red head ever, I wish I knew smart people like you
@HermanKruisman7 жыл бұрын
Did you try a larger prop? Lower RPM migth use the pressure better and it uses less air (maybe :))
@hawkbird62947 жыл бұрын
i was thinking that but the problem isnt run time its lack of thrust
@HermanKruisman7 жыл бұрын
Large prop has better static thrust. I suspect this engine type cannot get good power at high rpm because of to much resistence.
@jackedwards89707 жыл бұрын
Do you mean large in sense of diameter or pitch ?
@HermanKruisman7 жыл бұрын
Jack Edwards Larger diameter and pitch :) Look at the props for rubber motors, they have the same problem.
@softdorothy7 жыл бұрын
It has plenty of thrust at the start of the run. The larger prop could extend that high-pressure time.
@daadood1006 жыл бұрын
I loved your demonstration and willing to show that it is possible to fly a model without electric or gas
@saadatkitab41684 жыл бұрын
U can use 2 bottles and 2 propellers .... the weight will be increased a little but it will give more thrust.
@MatthewStauffer6 жыл бұрын
How about trying to start the engine by throwing it? You are losing a huge amount of power holding it and idling before tossing it. If that doesn't work, perhaps go back to the drawing board and devise a remote starter. That would be awesome in its own right not to mention very useful.
@lr216433 жыл бұрын
Something like a Cox spring starter might work, if it wasn't too heavy.
@leahparsuidualc6665 жыл бұрын
Tom ... you are like Buster Keaton, Laurel and Hardy AND the three stooges incarnated in one curious kid. Luv it! Thanks for sharing!!
@lapezcreeper26767 жыл бұрын
you should try powering it off dry ice
@RajelAran7 жыл бұрын
I thought that too, basically a dry ice bomb that vents for propulsion instead of exploding.
@faustdownunder5 жыл бұрын
Great work. I bought an airhog for my kids way back around 2002. It may be worthwhile mentioning that we still do not fully understand how an airfoil-shaped wing really works.
@lr216433 жыл бұрын
You and I don't, but I think people who make aerodynamics their life's work have a pretty good handle on it. The inability to describe a physical phenomenon and the associated set of equations in a few clear words, without resorting to math, does not imply a lack of understanding. Lots of times, explanations I hear that people claim are incompatible are like the 6 blind men and the elephant. (Apologies to actual blind people, who are likely smarter than the guys in the story.)
@fritz19906 жыл бұрын
Might want to lubricate the cylinder. Pam cooking spray works well,( don't eat that stuff though). 70lb pressure. Awesome job! Thanks for the video.
@milesgerschefske62315 жыл бұрын
One use a lanyard so the controller Two a shot of wd40 in your air tank, less friction in the motor means more rpm, and less wear on the piston and cylinder. Three buy an 12v little air pump that plugs in to your car, save your muscles for getting it airborne.
@nickmgls65234 жыл бұрын
The engine is plastic. Wd40 would damage it. Silicone based lubricants are suitable for plastics.
@thee49574 жыл бұрын
A Homo sapiens male is not likely to save on muscles.
@MrJdsenior6 жыл бұрын
Servos on the tail ARE NOT a good idea for many reasons. Weight and balance, pitch/yaw inertia, etc. Interesting project. A transmitter strap would be a useful addition, too. Never thought of RC as aerobic, but you've proved me wrong. ;-)
@jonipaananen93046 жыл бұрын
You should try som DLG flying, that will give you an exercise :D
@MrJdsenior6 жыл бұрын
Joni. I used to fly HLG all the time. I sometimes even HLG'd my SD-100 sailplane, a 100"'er, even got a small thermal on one hand launch, but only about a 5 minute flight on that one. I was really hoping to get up a ways into a 2 hour type flight, but alas... I would like to try some discuss launchers, but unfortunately my arm is not what it used to be after a MAJOR break with a long recovery.
@gkdiscovery6 жыл бұрын
Great Work Tom, Keep going on...I wish all the best for your future projects/
@charlesmynhier11024 жыл бұрын
Those "Air Hog" planes were the ultimate in air powered design and engineering. I bought one for you young Son, pumped it up, and sent it into the air, it caught a tail wind and went nearly a ¼ mile into some trees, We were never able to find it, so I bought another.
@panospylar4 жыл бұрын
The sound of the engine misfiring at start has to be the most realistic non-tangible of anything I've ever seen in the RC world so far.
@aucaothucofficial41975 жыл бұрын
how do you feel about the idea of adding a little water to the air tank?
@InfamousAMH6 жыл бұрын
Next make a compressed air helicopter.
@gruffcube4 жыл бұрын
@jaro g lmao
@agontukgaming17865 жыл бұрын
finally, for the 1st time in history. an "Air"plane is visualized!😆
@En_theo5 жыл бұрын
What about adding an helium balloon just so the plane has zero weight ? You could then add a more solid/heavier air container (thus allowing a longer flight).
@snppla5 жыл бұрын
That's a blimp.
@En_theo5 жыл бұрын
@@snppla not exactly... a blimp is much slower and mostly flight thanks to his weightless parts. Here I suggest just enough helium so he can add more compressed gaz with a more solid container.
@Tzctplus5 жыл бұрын
From professional Engineer to a better Engineer, respect!
@patrick44857 жыл бұрын
did you weigh the plane with compressed air inside???
@RajelAran7 жыл бұрын
Thought the same with the later flights, 60psi of earth atmo is not a negligible amount of weight and with a craft that light, it seems to make it a bit nose-heavy
@syntaxis55846 жыл бұрын
I figured its around 10g or air at 60psi
@ralfuz7776 жыл бұрын
You’re a genius!! Very inspiring!
@George-li1yv6 жыл бұрын
It always amazes me what people do in their spare time.
@davidschmidt60136 жыл бұрын
Another excellent vid. I just saw and commented upon your vacuum-powered car, then I find this. Very well done.
@patrickconnolly90736 жыл бұрын
I would change the engine from a single cylinder to an in-line 4 cylinder, and a bigger air tank. Otherwise this is amazing.
@CaptApril1235 жыл бұрын
The added weight and higher compression wouldn't really be worth it I'd assume. High pressure engine's scare the crap out of me.
@Witnaaay6 жыл бұрын
Wonder if this could run off steam, or some similar chemical reaction?
@AngryHybridApe5 жыл бұрын
You should have made the whole fuselage, nose to tail, out of bottle for more air capacity.
@sapozhnikkonnik18395 жыл бұрын
Kittelizer Laurelott it wouldve made it heavier so that means a better engine so that means it takes more fuel
@fish-hawk59034 жыл бұрын
@@sapozhnikkonnik1839 Is that a mathematical certainty? Just asking, because those bottles aren't very heavy. I was thinking the same principle could be used with the same tough bottles in the three-litre size, still end-to-end, to add two litres to the overall capacity and run-duration, without the extra diameter causing disproportionate increase in air resistance. But I daresay Tom had done the maths to see if it would gain more than it would lose. Brilliant video, and as others have said, SO much better for including the failures as well as the successes.
@molnez6 жыл бұрын
This is beyond impressive. I mean just making a pneumatic 3d printed motor is cool by itself, but having it efficient and light enough to actually achieve powered flight is just awesome. Never would have thought this would work if I hadn't seen it.
@quentincalabrese33004 жыл бұрын
Hi Tom, always a pleasure to see your videos. It look the engine is lack of power compared to this huge propeller. This is a problem I often encountered when building Free-Flight planes, a smaller propeller or a different pitch can do a big difference. Thanks for sharing !!
@PaulDWeber7 жыл бұрын
SHOULD LAUNCH transmitter in hand So you Dont have run back & get Transmitter and just throw it in air Prop will start spinning w/ force of air being thrown ?
@erykbing35876 жыл бұрын
Paul Weber he had to hold both the aircraft and start the prop...we dont have 3 arms
@krcsg4l7 жыл бұрын
9:01 WHEN YOU REMEMBER YOU LEFT THE OVEN ON
@pjanoo69736 жыл бұрын
Francisco Maçã I clicked and got an ad for a kia
@Nightsaberban6 жыл бұрын
@@pjanoo6973 Lol XD
@kaanyt57265 жыл бұрын
I laughed so hard xD
@fachrybillal93265 жыл бұрын
@@Nightsaberban is fuck!!
@everythingcool1015 жыл бұрын
put a turbo on it and should work flawlessly!!
@daar11136 жыл бұрын
Pretty neat. When I was a kid I had a toy car called the "Air Jammer Road Rammer" that ran off compressed air. It had a pretty powerful ready made engine in it but the tank for the air was pretty small.
@Raptor_Zx4 жыл бұрын
I congratulate you for your channel and your project, you are a very brilliant person, what I do not understand is why you only used 2 bottles of air to propel the plane, I think you could have used at least 4 bottles along the fuselage, well it is my humble opinion, you are more intelligent than me
@Phillipmkh7 жыл бұрын
Try using helium for more lift
@hawkbird62947 жыл бұрын
MKH lol wat
@Steinblocksebi7 жыл бұрын
MKH I hope your being sarcastic, if so, you are hilarious xD
@carolynmmitchell22407 жыл бұрын
Sebastian no, that's a great idea, the helium to propel it and lift it
@carolynmmitchell22407 жыл бұрын
Sebastian I was going to say it if nobody else had
@marcus_w07 жыл бұрын
You know, that compressed helium is heavier that expanded floating nearly free? Just think about the number of particles in the same place. To generate lift, they need space. A heliumbottle isn't floating at all - but if you put this helium into baloons and hook the bottle to them it will.
@arandomyoutuber66347 жыл бұрын
sounds like a spitfire
@thejay89636 жыл бұрын
*Merlin engines in general
@arandomyoutuber66346 жыл бұрын
I AM TOM yeah
@xKuukkelix6 жыл бұрын
What if you used something like co2 cartridge instead of the plastic bottle
@blackshirej6 жыл бұрын
I just got into 3-d printing and happened across your channel...very awesome stuff! Glad to have people like you in the hobby willing to share your projects!
@asyraftojiman68014 жыл бұрын
Just a shoutout from an ordinary person... Feeling that i am so backward in invention.. thanks for lifting up my spirit to be motivated in my works, study and reasearch.. you are cool like Tony Stark 😊🤘🏼🤘🏼🤘🏼
@blumac98016 жыл бұрын
Add dry ice to it to make it last longer
@Matthew-no4dn6 жыл бұрын
That would weigh it down to much
@JoseRamos-su3ep7 жыл бұрын
Maybe a 12gram CO2 cartridge with regulator....
@eliask61807 жыл бұрын
Build a battery powered compressor in the plane. Its not efficient, but it would be very funny and interesting to see!
@zurviver_37477 жыл бұрын
Pute a small solar cell on the wing, and a auto cyclicer so when it reaches engough psi it just starts from the ground, lands and refuels
@eliask61807 жыл бұрын
Good idea, but then he would need flaps too. Otherwise the Plane can´t launch from the ground
@ThomasGrillo6 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the video, and congrats on your aerospace engineering degree. :)
@shimronnetia6 жыл бұрын
you should be in aviation industry. you re very committed to flying
@mustygromits22087 жыл бұрын
What would happen if you put a lot of dry ice in the tank so it maintains pressure for longer?
@thehipmyster7 жыл бұрын
Musty Gromits 2 it might explode if you to much in