Cone Beam Computed Tomography (Vol. 1, Issue 1)

Dr. Parish Sedghizadeh discusses the benefits and increased utilization of Cone Beam CT scanning. Three-dimensional imaging is rapidly becoming the standard of care in dentistry, he explains, and its applications are increasing. Dr. Sedghizadeh also offers a refresher on pathology as well as a discussion on medical-legal liability in his video presentation.

[@housebird29]

One of the best presentations I ever listened too. Speaker is very clear, knowledgeable, precise and to the point. He keeps you interested in lecture. Thank you wet much !!

[@sherithorson3496]

Thank you. This was very helpful from a patient’s perspective.

[@stanleymwale3480]

This presentation is super and the presenter knows how to impart knowledge

[@zamansalman2935]

A very clear presentation ! Thank you Dr. Parish Sedghizadeh for this interesting lecture .

[@osamazaki8963]

I wish all teachers were like him

[@muslimkhoja]

Very interesting and well presented. Many thanks for sharing

[@dalalalomar4282]

Thank you, amazing presentation

[@Bmarker299]

Outstanding presentation

[@dr.aloktandon7070]

This is one of the best systematic explanations I have ever seen...... Thank you Doc.

[@LRaine16]

What's the pathology on 1:32? @Dr. Alok Tandon

[@CementumIn]

Thanks for sharing this video.

[@LICENSEDNAILTHERAPIST]

Wow! This type of technology for dental work is Amazing! So orthodontist and dentist should get it right😊

[@nevilavicky6966]

Thank u for this video

[@suwanatatnina]

Thank you doctor. It is important information for me to choose my dentist. I try to choose between the 2 nice dentist and one of the dentist have the 3 D x ray machine.

[@MohammadIslam-mz9ub]

Oral radiologists are the authority for cbct interpretation. Pathologist should do the final diagnosis using histology.

[@ROYalSmiles4256713]

Thank you so much for sharing this video. Can someone tell me the name of the good speaker, please?

[@icequeen9417]

I have come across some maxiofacail surgeon have not diagnosed the medical problem my relative is suffering from how do these people qualify?

[@ricklindquist166]

Hi, Wonder where you got the 33 uSv figure for traditional FMX? A traditional FMX using F speed and round collimation should result in an absorbed dose of approx. 170 uSv. Darn little, but not 33. The figure you quoted is appropriate for rectangular collimation, which is rarely employed in the USA.

[@LRaine16]

thank you, im a student this is a great overview of CBCT. What's the pathology on 1:32?

[@ampiciline]

Iranian docs are AWESOME

[@latemorning3901]

Please answer my question after reading it, thank you. What's the different between Panoramic and Con Beam X-ray?

[@smileimplant6988]

Thanks for sharing this video.