Congress Member Shocked After Learning The Second Amendment Is About Tyranny & Not Hunting

📲 Subscribe to ‪@ColionNoir‬ Here: bit.ly/3OTkrgB
New Release!! Embroidered Premium Hoodies
➡️ shop.mrcolionnoir.com/collect...
Too many people are tragically miseducated about why the Second Amendment exists. I don't blame these people because they've been taught that the Second Amendment is about hunting and sports shooting, except it's not.
Not only is it the people's right to fight back against a tyrannical government, but the Declaration of Independence said it's their DUTY!
All this nonsense about needing more than AR-15s to fight back against a tyrannical government is simply bully talk.
The founding fathers went to war against one of the most powerful armies in the world and won.
So miss me with the whole idea that the people can't go up against a tyrannical government, so we'll just sit and take it.
The Second Amendment doesn't guarantee that the people would win against a tyrannical government, but our chances are a lot greater fighting with ARMs (firearms) instead of just arms (muscles).
2nd Amendment In Shape Of Rifle (AR-15s are Protected by the 2nd Amendment Merchandise)
➡️ bit.ly/327ElwA
Shop The Best Pro 2A Conversation Starter Merch:
➡️ bit.ly/2CHLudt
Join Our 2A Membership Club here on KZbin and get these perks:
➡️ www.youtube.com/@colionnoir/join
Join MY Exclusive 2A Advocacy Text List while AUTOMATICALLY being entered in our monthly 2A Giveaways
➡️ bit.ly/3FFLHJi
Let's Go Brandon Merchandise
➡️ bit.ly/3EbcXP8
Get UnApologetically 2A Content In Short-Form On KZbin & Help Protect The Second Amendment
➡️kzbin.info...
FREE BOOK - If I Only Had One Concealed Carry
➡️ www.mrcolionnoir.com/start-here/
PRO 2A Message Hats In Trucker, Dad, Snapback & More
➡️ shop.mrcolionnoir.com/collect...
Looking to help further our Pro Constitution, Pro 2A message, donate below:
www.MrColionNoir.com/donate/
UnApologetically 2A Content Content On Other Platforms:
Twitter - / mrcolionnoir
Instagram - / colionnoir
Facebook - / colionnoir
Gab - gab.com/ColionNoir
Truth Social- truthsocial.com/@ColionNoir
KZbin Shorts - kzbin.info?...
#2ANews #ColionNoir #DefensiveGunUse

[@Vibe77Guy]

"Do you mean citizens could use semi automatic firearms against our own troops?" "In the instance that those troops are directed against those citizens, absolutely!"

[@RealJeep]

Not so worried about the troops as I am about the weaponized federal law enforcement agencies.

[@1new-man]

Yup; U R your first responder

[@av2245]

This is basic projection. Nadler speaks as if the government is ruler over the people, which is why he is projecting that people cant use weapons against the government that they themselves established. Of course the people can. "We the People" is the important part.

[@tgs9740]

You mean fully automatic firearms.

[@tgs9740]

​@@RealJeepShould be worried they're not on your side.

[@EricT3769]

Yeah, a Congressman who took an oath to uphold the Constitution doesn’t even know what the 2nd amendment is about. How the hell can we expect people like that to protect our rights?

[@archer721]

How can you take an oath to a document that you have never read?…🤔 and can’t understand it even when explained!

[@Jesussaves8961]

They do not want us to have the right to carry, period

[@thomasrfoster4503]

You cannot expect individuals like Nadler to protect our rights

[@Bolo2028]

They don’t want to protect our rights. They want to expand their power and control.

[@AniwayasSong]

'We' can't, and 'We've' been total FOOLS for ever believing it, but worse of all, allowing him/them to continue getting away with their BS!

[@anombrerose6311]

"The beauty of the Second Amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it." -- Thomas Jefferson

[@Jirodyne]

Except they HAVE taken it away. The ATF exists. Firearms are Regulated, controlled, and there are weapons you can not own or use. You can not own a tank. you can not own a warship, you can not own a nuke. "Shall NOT Infringe" does not mean "We will let you have some weapons, but not others." It also does not say "Guns" It specifically says "Bare Arms" As in ANY weapon, be it Sword, Gun, Explosive C4, or a Fleet Carrier War Ship. We LITERALLY had NO WEAPONS in the army during the CIVIL WAR, 100 years AFTER the founding, and all the Warships and guns used by the soldiers and blockaid of the south were owned and on loan by citizens, when the conscripted men didn't bring their own gun to use. It is only RESENT history that guns were HEAVILY Regulated, that the military was VASTLY more armed that Citizens, and laws put in place that Citizens can NOT be just as armed, or more, than the Military with "Military Grade Weaponry", such as Tanks, Wars Planes, War Jets, and War Ships. Sorry, but the Second Amendment is already dead. They don't need to take your guns away, cause they already have more firepower than all citizens combined, and have stripped your ability to fight them back by restricting the guns that could fight against their superior gear and weaponry.

[@ronwatford7331]

​@@Jirodynethey haven't stripped shit. I have 4 tours combat experience under my belt, along with millions of other veterans from many eras. One man well trained with his rifle and the ability to maneuver and communicate with his fellows is FAR more potent than anyone would make you believe.

[@slvrktman7824]

Trying to “take It” is a GIANT RED FLAG!!!

[@grantdeason9261]

here! here!

[@bigthing75]

@@Jirodyne The word you are looking for is because, not "cause" look it up. Third paragraph second line after the word "away".

[@cmdrreggit]

I'm British. My country used to own your country. If it wasn't for your firearms - it still would. *Never ever give up that right.*

[@jypsridic]

a lot has changed in the last 250 years though. Guns back then had the same effective range as a thrown rock, back now we have tanks and artillery that can shoot you from 20 miles away.

[@cmdrreggit]

@@jypsridic A very good point. Civil war artillery generally had an effective range of no more than 1700 yards, with snipers being able to hit targets at around 800-1000 yards. Not impressive by modern standards - but it's always worth remembering we're talking about lethal force... Also worth remembering that Dr. Richard J. Gatling of Chicago, was selling his famous gun to state troops at this time, state militias and private mercenaries were also very much a thing.

[@donfss5088]

Gun Control...The True Story of Innocents Betrayed - - - kzbin.info/www/bejne/hH-Tp56JhJ6hbrs

[@NoobTamer]

@@jypsridic You can throw a rock accurately and powerful enough to kill someone at 200m? Yeah right. Their guns weren't useless then. I recommend watching some muzzle loading channels here on KZbin, people like britishmuzzleloaders disprove any notion that these guns were terrible.

[@matthewkress6161]

@@jypsridicand We the People still have a right to those munitions. Out here in the country, it isn’t uncommon to know of some people who own and maintain functioning tanks and artillery pieces. Of which i know sounds absurd to more urban and city folk.

[@mikelyon5595]

Shocking; A tyrant is upset you can defend yourself from their authority!

[@warbuzzard7167]

Also a tyrant: "You mean you'd use your semi-automatic rifles to defend yourself against our soldiers **attacking you with their fully-automatic rifles and machine guns and air support?**" **sotto voce**

[@ritab-c492]

The woke left dems are trying to dissolve the constitution

[@thecursed01]

should immediatly reply: so you are planning to use the military against the ppl you are sworn to serve?

[@iamkesha.]

This is EXACTLY how I understand it.

[@rachdarastrix5251]

@@warbuzzard7167 US Citizen: "Even in the least historically accurate movie Hollywood ever produced you can clearly see revolutionaries using their guns to shoot soldiers sent to put an end, to their existence, by a tyrannical government. You wouldn't even have had a chance to rise to power if they had not! Because the government we overthrew back then would STILL BE IN POWER! Consider yourself lucky our generation today are willing to sit back and do nothing when taxed more than we were back then. Times like these are not the time for Romans 13!"

[@KeystoneTexan]

This guy damn well knows what the second amendment is for

[@archer721]

And he knows it was written about him…

[@philshock3805]

Of course he does. Not only that, he SWORE an OATH to protect it!

[@dougsmith6262]

Who in their right mind would think that an amendment written at a time when most Americans *had* to hunt, think that the government could grant people the right to feed themselves and their families?

[@scottcantdance804]

He knows, he just pretends not to understand and plays dumb during debates when he's in a losing position. It's a trick as old as time with his people.

[@damonslazyk8724]

@@dougsmith6262your answer is written in the amendment

[@icehoof]

"You would use these against American troops?" Oh man, wait until he finds out how many American troops would still opt to use them against him as well

[@chulee846]

each and every soldier no matter what branch takes an oath to defend the Constitution Not the government. So I hope when it comes down to push or backoff against American citizens They would pause and think about what the Constitution is then take action. Remember those that wish to bring down this concept not only exist in other places but also right here in our own government. The never mind 'we' know better group. Are they serving the PEOPLE or themselves................

[@gothic_ace2037]

No one gives a shit about the people anymore, people pretend like they do but then they end up gaining power and forget people are people and end up fighting against those people while thinking they are doing the right thing. ​@chulee846

[@rbrown335]

Perhaps the congressman needs to be reminded that the Taliban was able to force the US military out of Afghanistan through resistance with small arms IED's and the like.

[@rkba4923]

And the Russians, among others.

[@AdamantLightLP]

The US wasn’t forced out. We left because that was always the plan. 20 years was long enough to act as the security force of the nation. It’s not our fault that the instant we left the government decided not to defend itself.

[@dancurtis611]

And a payoff to traitor joe...

[@joeycampbell940]

The hiding in caves, having no uniform or structure, using women and children as shields all played big parts in the pull out.

[@ElementofKindness]

How can someone as utterly uninformed as Nadler, possibly hold such a high level of authority in this country?

[@madtabby66]

He’s obedient to his employers.

[@ScarriorIII]

Because we let him.

[@Br3ttM]

Being uninformed about the Constitution makes it easier to ignore, and believing you own lies makes it easy to keep your story straight, so they don't slip up like Biden does and tell the truth.

[@toashez2410]

@@devincook1292 THIS!^^^

[@thecursed01]

ppl elected g.w.bush...TWICE...so no real surprise there XD

[@phaylnx]

I NEVER understood how anyone could link the Second Amendment to hunting. It literally says the words "militia" and "free state". Is the purpose of a militia to provide meat? Hell no it ain't.

[@shadowcastyt]

They believe the “militia” is referring to the military, which text and tradition (putting aside the fact that the amendment explicitly states “right of the people”) is easily proven to be false

[@davidrush4908]

They choose not to understand the introductory followed by operative clause construction. They think it requires membership in a government organized militia, and totally ignore "the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed" Cognitive dissonance.

[@CMTechnica]

@@davidrush4908I’ve never heard of a government militia in the US. They’re almost always volunteer civilians from the local community without a formal structure. They’re organized, there’s a hierarchy, but it’s not governmental.

[@empireoflizards]

I'm sure some lefty will try to say a 'militia' was an organized hunting party to feed the village back in the day. Hell, they gaslight everything else.

[@madtabby66]

Look at the hoops they jump through to pretend they can’t understand. I’m to the point of just suggesting they contact a Sylvan learning centre for help.

[@Deedeedee214]

He wasn't shocked, he wanted his sound bite to label his colleague as a terrorist.

[@wileysettlemire346]

I was at our community college a few weeks ago and I was wearing my NRA cap. And one of the students was on the debate team and they were going to debate the 2nd Amendment and wanted me to answer some questions about why we still need to and I told him the same thing. And that that is one of the first things that dictators do is unarm the people. He said he didn't think of that and I told him that it's why we have it in the first place.

[@StonerBear420]

"A free people ought not only be armed and disciplined, but they should have sufficient arms and ammunition to maintain a status of independence from any who might attempt to abuse them, which would include their own government.” - George Washington

[@LoanwordEggcorn]

That is a false quote. George Washington never said it. Please don't use false quotes as that makes us look like liars.

[@RobertHenry-gv3mc]

Thank you. That is exactly why.

[@LoanwordEggcorn]

@@RobertHenry-gv3mc Except George Washington never said it. Please don't use false quotes as it makes us look like liars.

[@MisterFixitNumber1]

That is an exact quote from George Washington is a bit different however has the same meaning: "A free people ought not only to be armed, but disciplined; to which end a uniform and well-digested plan is requisite; and their safety and interest require that they should promote such manufactories as tend to render them independent of others for essential, particularly military, supplies.”

[@LoanwordEggcorn]

@@MisterFixitNumber1 Thank you. That's the correct quote. It's from "George Washington to the United States Senate and House of Representatives, January 8, 1790". The first quote is false.

[@kidkicker81]

They know exactly what the second amendment is for. That is why they are fighting so hard to get rid of it.

[@cncmillman]

Exactly, less than 450 homicides per year using a rifle and some how this is the most important issue, banning AR’s.

[@analyticalhabitrails9857]

Agreed.

[@aswitalski]

exactly

[@XENOS_Indie_Game_Dev]

as long as every red blooded true American NEVER give up their 2nd Amendment rights and know what it means to have those rights, let's hope the people will never succumb to stupidity and give up those rights

[@alphagt62]

Nadler is such a putz. “So you’d fire on American Troops?”, how about, “So you’d instruct American troops to fire on civilians?”. Why else would anyone fire on troops? He is the definition of a tyrant.

[@Ben-rq7gv]

There are less than 500k US troops around the world and over 300 million US citizens. To think citizens couldn't stop tyranny is laughable. - A current service member.

[@triton199]

something like 5.5 million small arms (pistols, rifles, shotguns) in possession of the US military and police forces combined. the US citizenry has appx 393 million, these numbers are roughly accurate as of 2018 per the Small Arms Survey. and the amount for citizen held firearms has absolutely gone up by a substantial amount in that time. i would personally estimate closer to 400 million at least. appx 1.2 firearms PER PERSON.

[@dolorousjohn5499]

Not to mention the fact that those American troops..... are American citizens.

[@yutub561]

I would like to think most of our service members would stand up to the tyranny as well and either not attach citizens, or help the citizens. Plenty of servicemen and women are unhappy with the administration and wouldn't let anything like that fly

[@nhonnguyen7841]

@@yutub561you haven’t been paying attention. The military already went through a purge and ideological shift.

[@thomascronan9964]

Amen bro.illegal orders.naw. even if Joe ordered it. Taint no way the troops do that. Coup de etat!

[@davespin9034]

Love that you added the text from the Declaration of Independence. Nobody does that, so good on you brother!

[@nad9969]

The telling part is Nadler compared American troops to tyranny.

[@MalefaxTheBlack]

He said the quiet part out loud.

[@philshock3805]

That was my first reaction! Because to him and his ilk, they are the rulers and citizens are to be ruled. It's just a shame there are so many clueless citizens who keep voting for these tyrants.

[@1new-man]

U R Wise

[@nad9969]

@@MalefaxTheBlack 100%

[@Slavesforsale1]

While I trust that a good amount of people serving in the U.S military would fight against the government if it showed its hand, many more would undoubtedly "just follow orders". The number veterans who are against civilians owning firearms proves it.

[@AMX86]

If a congress critter DOES NOT UNDERSTAND the Constitution they have NO PLACE in government.

[@BoondockRoberts]

with the ease they can slip activists into the supreme court they can pretty much treat their oath like a video game user agreement

[@scottcantdance804]

He knows, he just pretends not to understand and plays dumb during debates when he's in a losing position. It's a trick as old as time with his people.

[@F_JoeBiden-tu6cl]

The people need to remind them. By whatever means necessary.

[@PALACIO254]

The concept of an independent populace is foreign to the lizards

[@Benjanuva]

Yet we still vote them in...

[@wesjones1417]

"Are you saying you'd use it against our troops?" As one of those troops...yes Mr. Nadler....that's exactly what we are saying.

[@armadillolover99]

I think it should be required for any prospective members of Congress to read and explain the Constitution (especially the Bill of Rights), the Declaration of Independence and at least a couple Federalist Papers before they’re allowed to run for office.

[@DJMcCabe3]

As a public school teacher I have gotten to witness how the government is trying to rewrite history. The new curriculum is using this year actually skips over teaching about the 2nd Amendment. We teach it anyway. It is our Declaration of Independence and it’s our duty and privilege to teach it to the next generation.

[@anthonyvacca9379]

Thank u for telling the truth

[@paulc652]

I appreciate you, thank you for your service to the children of America.

[@TheJacali]

You’re a good teacher

[@roseannamanues2111]

Now I know why Civics isn't being taught. With my youngest daughter I am going to teach it to her. My eldest daughter and eldest nephew didn't learn about the Indian Removal Act. Cause my daughter wanted to learn about the Trail of Tears. Her teacher told her that the school board didn't want them to learn about it. She was even more interested when she saw how many people from Ireland were donating to the Native Americans. She also saw the monument in Cork County Ireland. We both looked it up and that's when we found out that after the Choctaw tribe finished their walk .They sent what funds they had to the Irish people. When they heard about what they were going through. One of things that can be mentioned to your class. Is how we got our system of government was from the Iroquois Tribe. When Benjamin Franklin visited them he saw how their system was. He brought up it to the others and they loved the idea.

[@RodRoz707]

Hallelujah!! Thank you for teaching the truth. I wish we had more teachers like you

[@tf2529]

The Democrat Party is the perfect example of why our Founding Fathers gave us the Second Amendment.

[@ronsindric4241]

While there are probably a large number of anti-2A Democrats, IT IS TIME FOR DEMOCRATS WHO SUPPORT 2A TO STAND UP AND BE HEARD !

[@The1337nut]

There are Rinos as well…

[@c.galindo9639]

Doesn’t matter political affiliation or anything. The fact of the matter is that people who want to put power over others will do so by action under any image they can amass for themselves

[@randybryant1141]

Amen

[@TreeGod.]

@@c.galindo9639 your right, but at the very least, there’s 1-2% of the republicans trying to protect the constitution. There’s 0% of democrats

[@kevinclark2797]

If elected official challenges the second amendment wouldn’t that make them an oath breaker disqualifying them from there position 🤔

[@archer4922]

The question that needs to be asked is "ok, say you ban guns, what makes you believe that criminals will follow the law??? Their criminals, they don't care about laws."

[@daverobson3084]

Well, that's one question that should be asked.

[@l33tninja1]

They usually try to point out how things turn out in places like Japan forgetting that Japan is a lot easier to monitor what goes in and out plus many criminals do have guns there they just aren't stupid enough to use them if their not needed since most people aren't armed in any real way including no bladed weapons. The Japanese culture and their traditions also make a big difference towards keeping gun violence down. If America kept its Christian morals and ethics even if not the religious part then we would see a much better country right now instead of the depraved cruel one we have today.

[@notsure7874]

@@l33tninja1 Australia is an island with some of the most restrictive gun control in the world, and they can't even keep machine guns out of the hands of criminals.

[@mikkelnpetersen]

*They're

[@aaronforsythe8556]

I bring this up to my friends and they just say it makes it harder for the criminals to get them.

[@Bruwulf]

The 1st Amendment is the bulwark that protects our rights and liberty. The 2nd Amendment is the failsafe for when the bulwark falls.

[@jabrockobiden9434]

And all other ammendments cannot nullify either of them.

[@base4037]

@@jabrockobiden9434 there's a reason they made them before the others

[@shadowcat3163]

Unfortunately they have already neutered the First Amendment with hand picked State Media. Now they are trying to regulate the Second out of existence because it is a threat to their long term plans.

[@TommyRibs]

Chip Roy NAILED it. The second amendment doesn’t grant you the right to keep and bear arms. The second amendment states that your God-Given right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. The right to defend ourselves is not granted to us by the govt. It is granted to us by our creator.

[@robynparker4254]

Is anyone actually surprised that Nadler- or ANY democrat- doesn't understand the Constitution?

[@ericwolf9482]

Note; the 2ed Amendment says the Government "Cannot" infringe upon a right to own weapons. Even those not even created yet. They are defensive.

[@oakleyfreak45]

Gotta love how nadler was surprised anyone would think about standing up to a tyrannical government but didn't seem to care about troops being against citizens.

[@ShaggyRogers1]

Gotta love that Chip Roy says "tyranny" and Nadler hears "American troops"....

[@ChrisLopez-ms6eh]

Exactly….that small exchange is extremely telling about what is in Nadlers (and his other friends) minds when it comes to the military and the people.

[@madtabby66]

They must hate that the troops swear to uphold the constitution. All the commonwealth countries swear to uphold the crown (government)

[@warbuzzard7167]

It's because he's making plans to send American troops door-to-door against citizens who fail to comply.

[@SuitOne]

As an American troop, if an American troop is trying to take your rights they are going against the oath they took and you should absolutely defend yourself against them.

[@bjbrtn5644]

What Nadler doesn't acknowledge while posing his question is that a citizen who feels threatened by an American troop means that the government is directing the military against American citizens.

[@kelseyc.3797]

Absolutely, I'm a Veteran and I agree.

[@JessicaBlaze89]

Thank you for your service ❤

[@JessicaBlaze89]

​@@kelseyc.3797Thank you for your service ☺️❤

[@roadkillz78]

The scary notion is how many soldiers and generals are loyal to the establishment, as opposed to those loyal to the People (which includes themselves) and the Country.

[@Knotjammin2]

Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr had it right when he said..."Between two groups of people who want to make inconsistent kinds of worlds, I see no remedy but force."

[@patrickhastings3733]

100% correct; every man woman and child US citizen in the US should be required to watch this

[@michaelgarland2281]

The Second Amendment was actually the first Amendment that the Continental Congress discussed and ratified. Which tells you how important the 2nd Amendment was, and is, for they knew tyranny and how to stop it !!!

[@siamihari8717]

The First is only first in order because it was deemed the utmost important. The second is where it is because without it you wouldnt have the first and without the first you could have none.

[@lordgarion514]

But what you don't know, is that when the idea of adding the amendments to the constitution, it was originally rejected. They literally rejected it because, and I roughly quote, "because the Constitution itself will so constrain the government, that amendments wouldn't be needed". The vastly underestimated the ability of people to find loopholes. Luckily, I think it was Massachusetts that still demanded it be included.

[@turtletruth]

Written by a United States Marine! (50-Years Ago!) VICTIMLESS alcohol-related traffic offenses eternally remove 2-A rights which can never be expunged. They're eternal 2-A felonies! (By Nexus with Federal law) The Victimless DUI convictions I had received were nearly 50 years ago! (VOID OF ACCIDENT, INCIDENT OR VICTIM permanently remove the 2-A!) All (3) DUIs were victimless and acquired after returning home after serving (6) years as a United States Marine and the last two years in Iran during the Iranian hostage crisis as a foreign interrogator! (1979) (M.P.) Coming back to the States was difficult ... Many veterans at the time weren't as fortunate having decided to take their own lives rather than fight the head demons of gore and smell of war. (23/Marines commit suicide every day!) Alcohol was the only relief nearly 50 years ago before having my own family and grandchildren! I had honorably served my country as a United States Marine (Honorably Discharged) and cannot even possess a single bullet for life ... Victimless DUI laws allow the driver to retain the driver's license, the vehicle, and voting rights but not the 2-A Right of protecting family, life, and wealth! Improper laws invent eternal Felons out of victimless non-violent offenses to abrogate the 2-A in the guise of public safety! The victimless DUI debt of 2-A slavery can never be repaid in Michigan: Texas allows DUI and all convicted felons after 5-years to possess firearms within their homes to protect life. (Why haven't other states followed Texas!) - USMC (Semper Fidelis) Sgt E-5 (Honorably Discharged United States Marine!)

[@scottmcley5111]

People that don't understand the 2nd amendment need to take a solo vacation in a dictatorship.

[@GmanGSW]

I'd add... to take a "friend," too. Any Socialist Country they want to go to... Dictatorships will call themselves Social Democracies at times...

[@kathyward2641]

Yes!

[@xXJBrutalXx]

he should have said if you plan on using American troops for Tyranny? then yes

[@nodemever3291]

What do you want from a guy who can't tell when it's time to go use the bathroom? FJB FBO

[@dancurtis611]

Or which bathroom to use...

[@nodemever3291]

@@dancurtis611 In Nadlers case there is no choice other than which one is closest

[@terenceryan5214]

I love the fact that Nadler asked incredulously “You would fire on US troops!?” Completely ignoring the other half of that equation! The thought of using deadly force against men and women wearing the uniform of the United States is abhorrent, but even more abhorrent is the idea that THEY would use it against us! It’s a hypothetical situation I pray never comes to pass.

[@neilreynolds3858]

It will be interesting to see what side the troops are on when it does happen. Will they fire on American citizens? They have before.

[@roseannamanues2111]

The military and government didn't have any problems testing Agent Orange on citizens. They did it in Miami and Globe,Arizona. When people started getting sick they used the mine and smelters as their scapegoat. The farthest my dad went to during Vietnam was Japan. He has done tests recently and it's shown that he was exposed to Agent Orange. He did it cause of how many of his grandchildren have been diagnosed with ASD. I myself have seizures on both sides of my brain. The backside of my left is completely smooth it didn't form out all the way. My neurologist asked if my dad went and I told him no and I asked why. He told me that cause of how my brain was my daughter's ASD and five nieces and nephew's having it. That could be the only explanation. Cause of how it spliced into his DNA. He was the one who told us about the testing. He said that it splices by getting into the blood stream from the respiratory system. That's why so many soldiers got cancer. Also in the late 50s and 60s the EPA wasn't as strict on things. Cause I have been seeing children from two towns that have another mine and smelter. The owners then buried chemical waste under the ground. Many of them are going to my neurologist's office.

[@DecrepitBiden]

I hear they use NATO troops, non Americans, & use scenarios where they practice training to shoot American citizens, in order the desensitize them.

[@godlyk3]

@@neilreynolds3858 of course they would. The Government would convince everyone we are terrorist and the enemy.

[@davidhoffman8122]

I am from West Virginia and was raised here. In our history classes we were taught that the 2nd amendment was about our ability to defend ourselves against government overreach and tyranny.

[@kathycuster1714]

That's what I learned also!

[@detroitlady7201]

Problem is they quit teaching real history! Teachers are unionized by democrats. They quit teaching our real history years ago. Need to either home school or private school your children if you don't want them indoctrinated!

[@paulc652]

Yep, same here

[@IsaiahINRI]

Then your teachers did their job

[@MadFox-jr6by]

When was that because that's not what public schools are teaching in 2023.

[@melohairapetian4471]

Absolutely correct brother!

[@mountaintiger6945]

Sir, your clear & concise description of our 2A makes me proud to be an American. With sincerest admiration I thank you.

[@SmartAss4123]

They arent stupid. They are feigning ignorance to try and push this agenda

[@gpnulife]

yes my friend, and ignorance is not an excuse in law.

[@kbtube8125]

they don't know what a woman is. . .

[@alexyo2440]

Agenda for now, camps for later. Look at the guy's nose and check what percentage of these people are billionaires

[@dylonjackson8863]

​@@kbtube8125 Yes they do they just refuse to accept reality because that's what radical ideologue cultists do.

[@Jim-zy3ny]

That’s called evil & they do this every single time.

[@johng6272]

Rep Chip Roy is a true American. He supports our Constitutional & God given rights.

[@jackhouston357]

Well, he's a Texan

[@jeffrey3059]

No such thing as God given rights.

[@aloneranger3980]

Maybe not to you...@@jeffrey3059

[@christip20]

At least Republicans know what they are, especially after decades in Congress!

[@safffff1000]

Google, "The 5th Dimension - The Declaration/People Gotta Be Free - 1971", and this beautifully was put to a song. 1st played to all governors attending a conference with President Nixon was present. when the song was over there was a big silence, the governors were at a loss for hearing such radical stuff. The silence was broken when Nixon stood up and started clapping. 2

[@danshultz697]

It’s a dam shame that schools don’t teach kids about true history! Thank you for sharing truth and history with America !!! Keep up the good work and never end the fight !!!!!!!!

[@gothic_ace2037]

Because schools don't give a shit about teaching kids what they NEED to know, they want them stupid and ignorant so they follow along like sheep, no one in power will ever give a shit about people "absolute power corrupts absolutely". You could have the greatest intentions in the world but as soon as you step into power those morals won't hold up.

[@gradysanders2713]

FINALLY!! A politician knowing what the 2nd amendment is all about.

[@jpdesimone]

So we're supposed to believe the Framers -- having just won a massive revolutionary war against a well armed, tyrannical govt using their PERSONAL FIREARMS -- wrote into the Bill of Rights that only the govt should be armed? LOL

[@bbb462cid]

Worse, people will argue- without understanding the dates of ratification of the Bill of Rights or any knowledge of the Dick act- that the US Government would allow firearms to be provided to groups within the US that oppose that same unlawfully tyrannical government. In other words that the US government would both RUN the formal militia AND allow that same militia to oppose it when necessary, and willingly allow that militia the means to do so.

[@randynutt5660]

The people were also armed with the 'most deadly military weapon' created up to that time: The Pennsylvania Rifle! Accurate to 300 yards, it was the 'go-to' weapon of choice for marksman and sharp shooters. It played a key role in winning the Revolutionary War.

[@jimmyhardin6366]

You are correct,my oath as a soldier said that I was to guard the united states' of America against all enemies foreign and domestic. That oath doesn't expire

[@randycarroll2885]

I took that same oath in 1977 and I still Honor it to this day......

[@jimmyhardin6366]

@@randycarroll2885 thank you brother

[@hawkman302]

How can you be in government and not know the laws in place that are the foundation of the country.

[@victorcasa6355]

This was GREAT 👍❗👌🦾💪 MORE PEOPLE NEED TO KNOW THIS FOR CLEAR UNDERSTANDING 👏👏👏

[@user-uq6xk6ds3q]

There are people in our government that have forgotten or maybe never realized that The United States Constitution wasn't written to restrain citizens behavior, IT WAS WRITTEN TO RESTRAIN THE GOVERNMENT'S BEHAVIOR. 🇺🇸

[@christopherokeefe756]

Well said!

[@loloholmes2793]

That's why they/US Dept of Ed started phasing out Civics class in the 90's.

[@TexasPapa13]

Absolutely 100%

[@theeffete3396]

Might soon come a time they were reminded of that.

[@debragarrett]

Absolutely 💯

[@AngusKart]

Nadler was playing dumb, he knew full well the purpose of the 2nd amendment. He was trying to pass it of like Roy was being absurd, like that could never happen here in America.

[@OhNo-jq6iz]

The fact that Chip said “tyranny” and the first thing Nadler thought of was US troops… it lets you know EXACTLY how the dems would use the military if we citizens didnt have the means to fight them off !!!! I mean, it didnt even cross his mind that “tyranny” could have meant the invaders & para-gliding types we’ve seen in recent events?

[@oblivionsa7973]

Like it already hasn't, more than once...

[@Dunk1It1Hard]

Are you suggesting that someone would willingly direct American troops to preform egregious acts requiring American citizens to take up arms to preserve themselves, their families and their way of life? Even by saying that sentence alone, your acknowledging that a tyrannical order can be given. Just look at Ukraine. Israel. South America. Africa. All over the globe proves you are your own first responder. When your life is hanging in the balance and seconds count. Do you want a life saving tool? Or do you want a phone call? “For evil to succeed, good has to do nothing.” If your okay with nazi bullies gassing and performing genocide on Jewish peoples then openly acknowledge they, the Jews, have no reason to bear arms to defend themselves. Learn from history. Furthermore, to keep checks and balances, the people, the American tax paying citizens, should have the exact same technology at their disposal as military endeavors. What?! Why?! Look what the US and British government did to native Americans. When the tech isn’t laterally on the same playing field annihilation occurs. Of course, stacking the deck is always in one’s best interest when they have dubious and unscrupulous plans. Only enemies disarm each other. Friends and brothers have nothing to worry about except admire the strength of their growing family. Human history shows laying down arms creates easy targets, easy targets historically end up dead.

[@wtchr6883]

He knows that the Second Amendment is meant to keep politicians like him in check.

[@Mike-In-O-Town]

Bingo. Nadler knows what it means, he just loathes the founders and their restrictions on government that prevent him and those like him from running rampant over all of us. So he attempts to make Roy appear as the radical and/or dangerous entity in this conversation.

[@user-td3ps6op1g]

This is EXACTLY for what the 2A was designed. Mr. Noir has given us😢 a superb summary of why. READ the U. S. Constitution and quit hiding behind the "we can't prevail against the government" mantra. Remember Benjamin Franklin said: "Those who would give up their rights for safety, deserve neither."

[@user-wl5cn1lu4c]

You said all that needs to be said to any True American as we are supposedly known to be! Thanks for this video.

[@stevenfeil7079]

Nadler knows EXCTLY why the second amendment is for. So does the woman. They are not ignorant.

[@GoGupGo]

Yelp you are 100% correct

[@Razor-gx2dq]

And they are scared

[@gishjalmr5628]

It was the Penguin's lazy attempt to get Rep. Roy in a gotcha moment.

[@analyticalhabitrails9857]

Yeah, everyone can see they're playing dumb and playing with men's lives. And even if they didn't know, they and others would be DICtators are long over due for another lesson.

[@Hawkeye2001]

Willfully Ignorant. To obtain power for themselves.

[@sd906238]

The founding fathers didn't have computers, word processors, type writers or even pens or pencils. They used goose feathers and ink wells on parchment paper. So they thought real hard before putting their thoughts on parchment and were real eloquent. These crooked politicians think they can interpret the meaning of the Constitution. Our founding father were very clear with what they meant. They didn't mean for the guns to be used for home defense, hunting to put food on the table or even sport shooting. It is very clear our guns were meant to keep the tyrannical government under control.

[@Iron_Sights99]

A stroke of the pen cannot be taken back once written. They knew this damn well

[@AugustusTitus]

They had cannons, field guns, punt guns, and crank operated machine guns.

[@sintanan469]

@@AugustusTitus And so did the government. Now the government has flying guns, floating guns, hypersonic weaponry, guns capable of doing thousands of bullets a minute. Turns out the common man needs better tools to keep up with this arms race, too.

[@otpyrcralphpierre1742]

@@sintanan469 You have to remember, our Armed Forces are constituted by Citizens of our own country. Think about it.

[@derail6996]

@@AugustusTitushand crank Gatling guns didn’t come out till the 1860s!!!

[@stephenglover2650]

I absolutely love the video. It's so wonderful to see that man describe EXACTLY what 2A is about. Every American NEEDS to know and understand this.

[@shannonelliott9230]

What a bright and shining star you are!

[@ChristianConstitutionalist3192]

If You Do Not Know The Purpose Of The Second Amendment; You Should Not Be In Office.

[@ERAUsnow]

Nadler knows. Every Democrat knows. It's why they want it destroyed.

[@kevinbenoit7167]

Amen to that!!

[@sd906238]

If you don't know what a "Woman" is you shouldn't be a Supreme Court Judge.

[@rucker69]

Why are you typing like that?

[@Kaltwasser45]

Agreed! These are career politicians. Their ability to emotionally manipulate their constituents is top priority. These people know nothing outside of government access to info on trades, and getting seduced with lobbying offers and trades. Not to mention they have disdain for our founding so they simply disregard parts that they can't manipulate for their own political tools.

[@huddless50]

An important note is that the 2nd Amendment doesn't "give us" the right to keep or use weapons. It denies government any power to limit it. That is what we've allowed them to corrupt.

[@Mike-In-O-Town]

Absolutely correct. Basically, the 2A is a restriction on government meddling (shall not be infringed) not on us.

[@billsussman1073]

The most important note. Unfortunately, too many 2A advocates DO NOT understand this. The 2A doesnt grant you a damn thing. This point is the exact reason why the 2A will eventually be dissolved.

[@jillyd4509]

Thank you for this video! How sad that people don't already know this, especially a member of congress.

[@sdkee]

It is worth noting that civilian ownership of cannons was a thing in the early 19th century. Merchant ships in particular often armed themselves against privateers. And were occasionally encouraged by the US gov to actively engage with privateers via letters of marque. Strong men create good times and good times create weak men.

[@rogerward3185]

Whenever someone says "we could never hold out against the might of the U.S. military," I just ask them how well armed the Taliban was. I usually get a deer in headlights look as their brain tries to process.

[@av2245]

Don't even need to do that. Remember, Jan 6 almost overthrew the government. With no weapons, no communication, no vehicles, no leader. Hahaha

[@Slavesforsale1]

​@@av2245If Jan 6 was an actual Insurrection like (They) have screaming about for the last three fucking years, its would have won.

[@madtabby66]

@@av2245 isn’t doublethink wonderful? Granny on an unauthorized walkabout almost overthrew the government, but we’d need F16s to do that.

[@johnmeckel2319]

​@@av2245 That's the Exact Pathetic Claim of The Communist Democrat Party, and Two Traitorous RINOS, That Are No Longer in Government Service for that Exact Reason!

[@nicholastudor934]

I have had conversations about this. “Why do you need this?” I try to explain the purpose of the second amendment and they look at me like I’ve lost my mind.

[@xboxfanatic5622]

That sounds about right, they live in a bubble, they look around them and only see the surface so they can't see the purpose, they don't want to either, "it's uncomfortable, it's unpleasant, it's." Imho blah blah blah it's important but they can't handle the truth.

[@GrosvnerMcaffrey]

They're not programmed to like you

[@adamcuneo7189]

@nicholasstudor934, And those same people think abortion is okay. If that wasn't enough, they also celebrate Hamas killing hundreds of innocent people in a mass shooting.

[@1new-man]

After the corn fed greatest generation; Could you expect anything less of this soy fed generation? nuff said....

[@drosnova2911]

Those people are insulated from the real world by their cushy lives.

[@Leslie-es5ij]

They think that gun owners should have to take a gun class before they can carry a gun ? I think anyone in government should be required to take a class on the constitution of the United States of America before they can tell me what to do !

[@rnr5445]

Great explanation. Don’t believe anyone in Congress could say it better. If they can they would totally agree with you. And start informing other members of congress what this 2nd is all about.

[@msh6865]

The government has no business questioning the meaning of the 2A. It does not exist for them, it exists to protect those they serve...or subjugate.

[@yeetcanyon5799]

“You would use the second amendment against US troops?!” Yes. It’s what it is there for. Remember a polite society is an armed society.

[@phillipc1819]

We were british before we were American. We used weapons against our own troops because of tyranny 250 years ago, why would we not need to in the future?

[@DaveElectric]

So why doesn't he just say Yes?

[@DaveElectric]

@@tommyp1494 You don't get what you want in life by being coy about it.

[@crash7976]

Battle of Athens doesn't get talked about enough. Last example of the 2A being used to fight tyranny and it was less than a hundred years ago

[@davidspringham3962]

I seriously doubt that NADLER knows the Constitution or the Bill of Rights, much less understand anything written in the documents

[@phoenixrq9139]

A reminder that when Nadler was in his prime we still used Service Revolvers

[@mjay6245]

We still do sometimes.

[@josephhautzenroeder7512]

A colt python is still a sweet wheel gun

[@madtabby66]

I like revolvers. I’m not sure if it’s the shape of my hand, or bad instructors, but I’ve been bit many times by semi autos and having a firearm actually hanging from the thumb webbing hurts!

[@azsventures]

The 2nd amendment is to protect local citizens, against tyranny, big government.

[@teastrainer3604]

It's about a well-regulated militia.

[@mrs.lilianfetters1432]

​@@teastrainer3604And on your land you are the militia.

[@teastrainer3604]

@@mrs.lilianfetters1432 Your redefining "militia" as one person is worthless.

[@ME-yb2lm]

​​@@teastrainer3604 you need to go back to history class. From the authors themselves, the militia IS THE PEOPLE. Back then, it was common sense for parents to teach children in using firearms and protecting your own and your neighbor. The current definition of militia is a redefining done by the government itself to supercede the original meaning so they could directly control militia's.

[@roseannamanues2111]

That's why many on the left are wanting to take it away piece by piece. This shows which of these elected officials failed Civics.

[@maryfrederickson9400]

Thank you congressman Roy!

[@gscop1683]

God Bless Your Courage Colion!

[@TXPatriot737]

The Declaration of Independence specifically states that the people have the obligation and the right to remove a tyrannical government

[@anombrerose6311]

😊😊😊 Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826) in the Declaration of Independence: When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation…. We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness.-That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. - That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness… it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. 🔔 🔔 🔔 🔔 🔔 ⚖ ⚖ ⚖ ⚖ ⚖

[@badmanskill1112]

It's already tyrannical. Many just don't realize it yet because they control corporate media as well.

[@sherylwilson865]

Exactly!!

[@RabdoInternetGuy]

"When Tyranny becomes law, Resistance becomes duty" -Usually attributed to Thomas Jefferson, but not comfirmed

[@RaySmith-qg4ly]

You think a tyrannical government is one that follows the constitution, or one that takes away peoples rights, including the right to vote? One that makes policies that a majority of the people disagree with? A government that is led by a dictator surrounded with yes men?

[@jamessmith785]

The simple fact that this has to be explained to politicians who should know its original intent tells you all you need to know. We have idiots making policy who don't even understand the purpose of it.

[@PvblivsAelivs]

While I am familiar with the adage "never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity," I am not convinced stupidity adequately explains the situation.

[@marlathompson4084]

​@@PvblivsAelivs❤

[@darylhenry9595]

That's what happens when people refuse to vote 3rd party and only vote for the duopoly. The dummies float to the top on both sides.

[@hotdog9262]

the main reason for the second amendment at the time, were to arm the people so they could effectively crack down on slave revolts

[@paulweisgerber7654]

@@PvblivsAelivs You are right. In this case, it can definitely be attributed to malice. Especially where Nadler is concerned.

[@Brainchild69]

That miseducation is deliberate.

[@georgebetor2943]

Nailer is a box of rocks, what a goofball! You would think our representatives would know the verbiage in the Constitution and Bill of Rights!

[@frankbutta9344]

James Madison explicitly defines why an armed citizen is essential to a free nation. In fact, he wrote that a ratio of 25:1 armed citizens vs standing army is ideal. That is what we now have. Madison also wrote that if the nations of Europe were armed, their governments would be toppled overnight.

[@fletch52004]

I think we have more than a 25:1 ratio

[@thetest8777]

​@@fletch52004will us on the pro 2A 95:1

[@EchoKilo-wi9ec]

​@@fletch52004How much of that 25 is worth a damn when it counts?

[@fletch52004]

@@EchoKilo-wi9ec who knows at this point

[@brandont65]

Imagine being in government that long and just realizing that he is subject to the will of the American people

[@madtabby66]

Way way back (under Bush?) he said it’s a good thing there isn’t an intelligence test for office because most of them wouldn’t be there. The look on his face when he realized what he said.

[@michaelshapiro1543]

IT's NOT WHAT HE WAS TOLD BY HIS HANDLERS.

[@Metal_Siren]

the fact that he sounded like he didn't know the 2nd amendment was to fight tyranny......scares me to death

[@grump8086]

Exactly and that's also why the Freedom of Assembly is so important.

[@justnana2256]

Just a few years ago I had this conversation with my sister. She was astounded that the 2nd amendment was specifically for the people to protect themselves from government control. She even argued it was for personal defense and hunting. It took awhile and researching (I had to do it for her) that it was to protect us from our own government. And she was almost 60 years old! ❤️👍🇺🇲

[@1014p]

Literally taught in school it was made to fight against tyranny including the new United States if needed. Democrats worked hard to hide this over the years. Put in laws to obscure access or teaching gun skills.

[@richardlew3667]

How is anyone allowed to be a congressman or congresswoman and not know anything about the 2nd Amendment?

[@LetsInspireEachOther1]

Oh they know... they just don't want us to know... they want to take away our ways to defend ourselves so that they can be in complete control... there have been many governments that tried this and 1 was Nazi Germany. This country was formed fighting the tyranny of Britain. We are being taken over by tyranny again but many are too blind to see it

[@familyof5257]

Exactly

[@RaySmith-qg4ly]

They should know every amendment.

[@ironrose888]

Everyone who serves in congress needs to have a class on the constitution and be required to be tested on their knowledge before serving in congress. No tests scores less than 100% will be accepted for the position. 😊

[@sashmiel6566]

Because people are stupid when comfortable.

[@ahalfsesameseedbun7472]

It's not even about tyranny. It's literally just telling the government that they can't make laws against ownership.

[@ibrahimjaved5574]

That part where it is explained how the 2A works is very enlightening: It is not about overthrowing a governement over an isolated case, but eventually (inevitably), it reaches a point where it becomes a clear cut case of despotism.

[@relicpathfinder2800]

The shocking part is when they realized that THEY were the tyrants in question. The fact he asked specifically if citizens would use those firearms against U.S. Troops can only mean THEY ARE PLANNING ON USING THE MILITARY AGAINST CIVILIANS!

[@tnwhiskey68]

This is why I said Americans should be allowed to own tanks, machine guns and anything else the Govt has!

[@jhickssmd]

Yes… and we are long past due to use the 2A against a tyrannical government

[@demisx]

100%

[@aaadude1171]

Agreed! But you Definitely have to pass some super strict qualifications to own and operate a tank or an Apache! You don't want some dumb ass teen with on her phone driving her pink tiktok tank through your neighborhood after her boyfriend left her! Or you Don't want to park on the street!

[@nil981]

...if you knew what costs owning and driving a tank in the United States incurs....you would soon understand why nobody would want to own them.

[@johnblackrose]

@@aaadude1171there already are. Taxes. Fuel alone is insane

[@peterbryant1408]

We run a US Constitution bootcamp. It's a 4 to 5 hour video presentation. I've taken it twice and would do it again. I learned so much, and it cost 5 dollars for the handouts. You did a great job! Keep up the good work of spreading the word. Knowledge is power. Let's not be silent.

[@charleswalker3220]

The fact we have a congressman that just came to understand this is an issue itself. If you can't name the basic ammendments then how did he even get his job.

[@jimmyhardin6366]

It's a shame the people we elect think they don't have to abide by the oath they swore to when they were elected

[@section8usmc53]

Well, consider how many of those people don't know or understand either. Most of them don't care. They follow the crowd and clap like seals at everything they are told. A lot of them don't like guns, so that makes it even easier. "Government will protect them and only government should have them." They don't believe something like Germany in WWII could happen in a "modern and civilized" society.

[@marksmith9176]

It’s astonishing that Jerry had no idea why the second Amendment was so important our founding fathers made it number 2. I learned that in high school.

[@roadkillz78]

He does, he's just pretending he doesn't to fool his Democratic voters. These corrupt pigs know exactly what they are trying to do.

[@Chilidog335]

The same can be said for the rest of this communist regime.

[@phillipcarey3710]

Ty ty ty. Ive been telling people this for years. I shocks me how many 2nd ammendment activists don't even know this

[@JohnnyPottsIII]

Well said sir. It is amazing that these old timers in DC don't know this and understand it.

[@thizz408]

Finally, someone in Congress actually understands the constitution.

[@usarmypat]

The Second Amendment follows the First Amendment for a reason, to protect free speech, the right redress grievance against the government and the right to protest.

[@ddums89]

Something something why aren't full-auto firearms legal in Chicago, you should take some guns down there and practice your American freedom. Also aren't republicans anti-protest?

[@carnivorecave]

Tell that to the NY Judge...Gag order on Trump.

[@proguner]

the second amendment is like the foundation holding up the constitution and bill of rights

[@cyberft]

@@ddums89no, republicans aren’t anti-protest. The most peaceful protest during the summer of 2020 were in Republican strongholds. This was the case because those Americans were able to protest while heavily armed and the police thought better of using violence to break up their fellow citizens exercising their rights.

[@KB-ke3fi]

"Come and take it!!" Then, Boom!

[@garyl.6314]

You are totally CORRECT

[@On2wls]

I don't understand how someone ELECTED TO CONGRESS does not know the purpose of the 2nd Amendment. My first gun was at age 12 and even I understood the responsibilities that came with that gun. I can only assume Jerry was brought up by ignorant parents and never taught anything about the Constitution (or guns).

[@barry2949]

The issue really isn't armament the issue is people having the damn will to stand up against a tyrannical government.

[@knowbloc]

nobody’s gunna do anything. Everybody hides behind their phones, their careers, and their families. We’re doomed

[@jrich5150]

It’s totally shocking how ignorant some members of our government are.

[@Br3ttM]

For some of them, I'm pretty sure it takes effort to be that badly informed. They have to keep repeating their own lies until they forget it's a lie.

[@TinFoilHatConspiracy]

I dont think most of them really are this ignorant, I think they do that was a way of plausible deniability to avoid accountability.

[@jonathanwick1265]

They're not ignorant. They're just power hungry evil tyrants.

[@Astraeus..]

@@TinFoilHatConspiracy Yea, no. The thing about plausible deniability is it has to be plausible. Holding a seat in Congress and being this deliberately ignorant of the document that you're entire job is meant to protect and uphold? There's nothing plausible about it, nobody could be that completely oblivious by accident.

[@alwaysfreedom9354]

@@Astraeus.. You should have gotten many upvotes.

[@rw2698]

EXACTLY! The numerous times I've had to explain this to people. American ignorance is mind-blowing.

[@NicholasWalker-ej6ip]

Love this video, I’m proud to be part of your freedom, You prove undeniably that we have the duty to protect ourselves and our Country GOD bless you Mr. Colion Noir!