No video

Contract Law: Doctrine of Frustration

  Рет қаралды 10,313

Anthony Marinac

Anthony Marinac

10 жыл бұрын

If this video is helpful but you want something more, why not check out my new video "Contract Law in Two Hours" which takes you right through an undergraduate contract law course in two hours! It's at • Contract Law in Two Hours
In this video, we look at the doctrine of Frustration. Frustration is a way to end a contract, where something fundamental has changed with the result that the nature of the contract itself has changed.

Пікірлер: 19
@dipakpoudel7310
@dipakpoudel7310 2 жыл бұрын
you are so good, easy to understand the hard legal terms. This is simply too good. Thanks Anthony.
@AnthsLawSchool
@AnthsLawSchool 2 жыл бұрын
Thanks so much for taking the time to say such kind words, Dipak. Sincerely appreciated :)
@javierreyes7709
@javierreyes7709 4 жыл бұрын
Hi...yes 'totally' agree...this was gold. Thank you once again for your great explanation, and making it easy to understand with great examples.
@AnthsLawSchool
@AnthsLawSchool 3 жыл бұрын
You are very welcome :)
@Aaron-fj1hl
@Aaron-fj1hl 7 жыл бұрын
this is saving my semester.
@indaystocome7416
@indaystocome7416 7 жыл бұрын
me to very plain and simple with great examples. Very easy listening and clear voice.
@AnthsLawSchool
@AnthsLawSchool Жыл бұрын
That's awesome, Aaron. I hope the rest of your studies were successful!
@mukelabailuneta3100
@mukelabailuneta3100 8 ай бұрын
Great lesson thanks.
@maureendrieberg3821
@maureendrieberg3821 3 жыл бұрын
Excellent explanation of Doctrine of Frustration. Anthony made this subject easier to understand. Thank you.
@AnthsLawSchool
@AnthsLawSchool 3 жыл бұрын
You are very welcome :)
@johnpapazisis1997
@johnpapazisis1997 3 жыл бұрын
Great lecture for exam revision. Greetings from Vic Uni law student in Melbourne.
@AnthsLawSchool
@AnthsLawSchool 3 жыл бұрын
Best of luck for your exams, John!
@johnpapazisis1997
@johnpapazisis1997 3 жыл бұрын
@@AnthsLawSchool Your lecture videos on Frustration and estoppel helped me get an HD in contacts. Thanks for sharing your videos.
@sebastianvergara1179
@sebastianvergara1179 2 жыл бұрын
Great lecture!
@AnthsLawSchool
@AnthsLawSchool 2 жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@altoriaimmigrationandbusin4239
@altoriaimmigrationandbusin4239 3 жыл бұрын
Anthony! Your lectures are fun and really makes me enjoy this course, despite its difficulty and intense content that is DRIVING ME CRAZY :( I am a mature student juggling a zillion things and your videos make my life so much easier to comprehend. You are an angel ! I have a question, could you explain the difference between frustration and repudiation due to inability to perform? In repudiation, you gave an example of someone who needs to hold for ex a licence to do some work; so at contract time, they had the necessary license that subsequently expired and so they are no longer able to continue with contract, esp if license is needed to complete contract - suddenly it becomes illegal for the party to do the works. If we compare this with Maritime National Fish Ltd v Ocean Trawlers Ltd 1935 - which also involved a failure to obtain a license. In this case, the court held that (1) There was no frustration of the charterparty as the absence of a licence was due to the fact that the appellants’ choice of vessels, which were to be granted licences. (2) Therefore, the appellants remained liable for the hire of the vessel. Thus, there was faukt with one of the parties, namely Maritime National Fish, for failure to obtain the requisite licenses. So where one of the parties is at fault in any way whatsover, and in this case, the fact that the Maritime National Fish had to apply for licenses and was not given old licenses it had applied for, this was Can you explain what the difference between both is? Thank you... Lulwa
@AnthsLawSchool
@AnthsLawSchool 3 жыл бұрын
Hi Lulwa! Wow, that one is a bit detailed. LOL I do hope you're not trying to trick me into doing your assignment for you ;-) When you look at those cases, though, the big difference is whether the defaulting party could have done anything to avoid the situation. In the Ocean Trawlers case, the operators actually induced the licence loss by their choice of vessel, and so it can't be frustration. Frustration ONLY occurs when neither party is to blame for the frustrating circumstances. So, neither Krell nor Henry gave the King appendicitis or cancelled the coronation parade :)
@altoriaimmigrationandbusin4239
@altoriaimmigrationandbusin4239 3 жыл бұрын
@@AnthsLawSchool thank you! I promise I would never trick you to do my work ;) i guess i was overthinking and over analysing! I understood your explanation. I sat for my exam last week! fingers crossed 😫 Your videos really helped me! God Bless you! Lulwa
@babytvize
@babytvize 25 күн бұрын
"And what that means is the losses must lie where they fall" and what that means is.........😂😂😂
Contract Law - Termination by breach
44:16
Anthony Marinac
Рет қаралды 8 М.
Promissory Estoppel and Contract Law
32:32
Anthony Marinac
Рет қаралды 15 М.
Slow motion boy #shorts by Tsuriki Show
00:14
Tsuriki Show
Рет қаралды 10 МЛН
Пранк пошел не по плану…🥲
00:59
Саша Квашеная
Рет қаралды 7 МЛН
Я обещал подарить ему самокат!
01:00
Vlad Samokatchik
Рет қаралды 9 МЛН
Frustration Lecture (1 of 2)
15:01
Hans Mahncke
Рет қаралды 42 М.
Misrepresentation in Contract Law
40:18
Anthony Marinac
Рет қаралды 15 М.
Contract Law - Frustration Part 1
12:33
Law Sessions with Jennifer Housen
Рет қаралды 13 М.
Contract law - common law remedies
50:50
Anthony Marinac
Рет қаралды 10 М.
Contract Law: Implied Contractual Terms
41:33
Anthony Marinac
Рет қаралды 15 М.
Doctrine of Mistake in Contract Law
40:05
Anthony Marinac
Рет қаралды 20 М.
Contract Law: Consideration
40:38
Anthony Marinac
Рет қаралды 17 М.
Contract Law: The Australian Consumer Law
45:05
Anthony Marinac
Рет қаралды 13 М.
Contract Law:  The Doctrine of Privity
36:23
Anthony Marinac
Рет қаралды 22 М.
Slow motion boy #shorts by Tsuriki Show
00:14
Tsuriki Show
Рет қаралды 10 МЛН