Core i5 14400F vs Ultra 5 245K - Test in 10 Games

[@TestingGames]

I must warn you, the 245k was slightly overclocked by 200mhz, it didn't really affect the performance, but keep that in mind Games : PUBG - 0:09 S.T.A.L.K.E.R. 2 - 0:58 CYBERPUNK 2077 - 2:00 Star Wars Outlaws - 3:06 Forza Horizon 5 - 4:05 Hogwarts Legacy - 5:09 Ghost of Tsushima - 6:09 Starfield - 7:11 Microsoft Flight Simulator - 8:44 The Witcher 3 - 9:09 System: Windows 11 Core Core Ultra 5 245K OC 5.2GHz - bit.ly/3UpCv5I MSI MAG Z890 TOMAHAWK - bit.ly/3NFmC7a Core i5 14400F - bit.ly/3Sed1r4 ASUS ROG Strix Z790-E Gaming - bit.ly/3scEZpc RAM 32GB DDR5 6000MHz CL30 - bit.ly/4e3MqEG CPU Cooler - be quiet! Dark Rock Pro 4 - bit.ly/35G5atV GeForce RTX 4090 24GB - bit.ly/3CSaMCj SSD - 2xSAMSUNG 970 EVO M.2 2280 1TB - bit.ly/2NmWeQe Power Supply CORSAIR HX Series HX1200 1200W - bit.ly/3EZWtNj

[@fungame8117]

twice the price + new motherboard and only 15-20% higher performance in games😐

[@S10hype]

0:29 50fps more 💀

[@NGreedia]

Plus this is on 1080p. That difference diminishes a lot at 1440p and even more at 4k

[@theplayerofus319]

@@S10hype do you notice the diff between 195 and 248 fps dog? and these are only 28% more performance

[@Quessen]

for now. Intel will push some updates to get performance they got in ther lab tests.

[@sergeys2505]

Let's wait a little bit for b motherboards in January, man

[@lopserdff]

0:01 this intro never gets old

[@maji0]

It would be great if you tested without dlss and without starwars outlaws or starfield

[@OneTwoWolf]

I guess the performance per Watt uplift is ok, but the price is just way too high, 245K should be replacing the 14400F, not the 14600K.

[@RMKry]

Why you set Ultra settings on FH5? Almost all people play on Extreme settings.

[@ClayWheeler]

Because it's benchmarking CPU not GPU 🤦🏻‍♀️

[@RMKry]

@ClayWheeler Then if you testing only cpu why not low settings? Extreme for GPU and Low for CPU.

[@chameechka]

Только вот цена в российском ритейле 48k на 245k и 22k на 14400. Сравнивать его нужно с 14700, лол.

[@cloudcloud1822]

Did you have latest bios update during the test?

[@TuxikCE]

Why the F are you comparing a 245K to a 14400F, instead to a 14600K?

[@hangingwithvoid360]

Because the f is cheaper and is trading blows with the ultra regardless

[@141menace]

@@hangingwithvoid360 ??? no it doesnt

[@OneFreeMan17]

Because it’s his channel and he can do what he wants with it 🤡

[@EnmanuelDelacruzpaulino]

Exacto debes compararlo con el 14600k

[@Alfie0001]

because he already compared the 600K and the difference was nonexistent? also why not? for those who have the 400F and might be looking at this

[@-Rizecek-]

13600K / Hyperthreading off - same performance as 245K without changing the motherboard 👌👌

[@club4ghz]

Turn on HT 5.7 ghz P core, 5 ghz cache and you have ultra 7 but 90c spikes in stalker 2 in summer.

[@-Rizecek-]

@@club4ghz The reason why it didn't exceed 1.24V on processors..

[@club4ghz]

@@-Rizecek- I play stalker 5.5 x 4.3 x 4.8. No notable difference vs 5.7 x 4.5 x 5.0 just less heat and power consumption. Frame generation is doing all the magic.

[@VenatFFXIV]

​@@club4ghzYou're lucky if your 13600K is doing 5,7GHz and 5GHz on Cache. My KF is just doing 5,5GHz/4,5GHz. But it doesn't matter because my 24/7 Setting is 5,1GHz, 1.1V and 80W PL1/PL2.

[@club4ghz]

@@VenatFFXIV I have 3 OC 5.7 x 4.5 x 5.0 ghz 1.38v Avg. Very Hot 5.6 x 4.4 x 4.9 ghz 1.33v Avg. Acceptable 5.5 x 4.3 x 4.8 ghz 1.28v Avg. Very cool.

[@masenkodb3128]

Newer + higher SKU processor - expected outcome. Absolutely fantastic 1% lows and solid performance from the Ultra 5 245K here, but it's not meant to compete with the i5-14400F, rather the i5-14600K (which is much more performant than the i5-14400F for obvious reasons). I feel like the Ultra series of processors that just released are going to be more cherished later on, similarly to how we felt about so many different series of GPUs from both AMD and NVIDIA (and also more recently, Intel, which would be a much greater example of my scenario, with Arc having improved so much since it's initial release).

[@JakeySurani]

No one will buy it bcs of the awful day 1 reviews doesn't matter what they have done to improve it everyone wants 9800x3d.

[@matte_bar]

I would have honestly exspected less of an increase in performance given ho the i9 parts do, not that bad really

[@ReclusiveXL]

because it's misleading, those cpus are not in the same class despite being almost identical in some ways. 14400F is kind of entr-level cpu, not midrange. 14600K is the real competitor of 245k and the newer one loses in games. it's like comparing 7600X3D and 7500F

[@matte_bar]

@@ReclusiveXL yeah that's true

[@LordLucifer95]

They are doing an update on 265k, and the other ones is this the update or not they said it should be 15% faster and want it should have been at launch.

[@syedawishah]

I prefer 14400f bcoz iam poor

[@ssshootssshoot]

what about 9900k vs 12900k vs 9800x3d in 4k gaming????

[@Haon357]

Why is the 14400 only reaching 4090 MHz on pcore? Per Intel specs it can boost to 4700?

[@FalconPC228]

4.7ghz is the maximum possible frequency for one core, in games and demanding applications, the frequency for all cores is almost always 4.1ghz

[@OneTwoWolf]

4.7 GHz is only on a single core at a time, for all core it caps at 4.1

[@kevinyoliveira68]

You are noob?

[@太陽-r3n]

The only thing new in these processors is the graphics unit. 14. It comes reduced to 3nm size of generation processors. You can sell this to Intel’s own employees 😊

[@xandrop]

Can't believe someone buy 4090 for 1080p with 14400.

[@justlikes]

New bios update test?

[@casualgaming7000]

Damn compare a benchmark with ultra 7 vs ultra 9

[@MarcoZammarelli]

14600kf at 200 euros. It's really powerful but difficult to manage in terms of thermal (I use an aio 360). For these generations the best choice is ryzen, no way...

[@Maxssson]

Тест ни о чем, те у кого есть 4090, такое стоять не будет, соответственно нужно что-то намного дешевле, тогда и смотреть на разницу, хотя ее может и не быть, тест в поддержку нового высера от интуля///

[@milkronin2488]

Как раз напротив - здесь у тебя тест процессора, а 4090, как самая производительная карта, будет лучшим выбором сейчас для теста процессоров с наименьшим упором (если вообще с каким-то упором) в эти самые процессоры. В "реальности" как ты говоришь, а именно с упором в видеокарту, между камнями тогда будет разница ещё меньше, чем в видео, а в видео она и так очень маленькая.

[@fernando46_BR]

I prefer the 245K, I'm thinking about setting up a new setup with the 265K.

[@toms4738]

Just built a new setup with a 265k upgraded from a i7-9700k. World of a difference.

[@fernando46_BR]

@@toms4738 And man, I have an i7 10700K and I'm thinking about changing to this setup.

[@refragged]

@@fernando46_BRI just did this exact upgrade I am very happy. Paired with 4070 Super. Very fast and I’m happy

[@fernando46_BR]

@@refragged Congratulations on the upgrade. It's a good setup.

[@Alex_Games_PCs]

Nothing bad for 245k. Just price.

[@bobbybobby9955]

ultra cpu work at 5200 mhz, and thad why he beat 14400f

[@4a4arA]

Ultra 5 225F will come January 2025 and will be next version of i5 14400F

[@alexcs911]

In 2k, there will be no difference

[@matheusc972]

14600K still better than both of 'em

[@ivofixzone6410]

The sorry state of Intel is left them to compete to themselves only.

[@الضاهربيبرس-ف5ع]

5 245k vs i5 14600k 👍

[@thedesk954]

Can you do U9 benchmarks 1 P 16 E core Vs 8 P core 4 E core

[@Dhiacool]

Ryzen 5 7500f 🤫🥱

[@raul1642]

pbo +200 clock + buildzoid hynix easy timings = rip shintel 🤫🥱

[@GT4tube]

4.0 ghz vs 5.2 ghz no right but 245K weak increase performance with 5.2ghz +10% fps damn bad if 245K Undervolt 5.2 to 4.0ghz will same fps or worse lol just Energy TDP is fixed good...

[@zangetsu_the_best_zanpakuto]

if you downclock a ferrarri to 4.0GHz it will be same fps as my nissan

[@lycherasbry]

Pretty impressive for a 4Ghz card

[@jokersblackcard]

Please test a RTX 4070 Super: with 12400f and ultra 5 245k(f) 1080p Ultra 1440p Ultra 1440p Ultra + Raytracing 4k Raytracing 4k Raytracing + DLSS ... Thx

[@fernando46_BR]

It's a little expensive here in Brazil, I'll wait a little until the price goes down.

[@justlikes]

Ryzen 7 9800x 3d vs Intel core ultra 9 285k 4k testing bro

[@orhooorvfuc96484]

14kf vs ultra pls

[@Vtecquila]

245k is the new 14600k, why to compare with 14400f , compare him with 235

[@2010Zanoza2]

Bad optimized games versus bad processors. 🤣

[@eddiesneax6754]

You must be out of your mind to think that these processors are bad🤣 Speak if not less or nothing about something you know no idea of lil bro🤣

[@k680B]

@@eddiesneax6754 not i9 = bad

[@2010Zanoza2]

@@eddiesneax6754 All these processors are bad comparing with 9800 x3D or new Threadripper 3D based on 9000 series CPUs with 512mb cache and 40 cores.

[@nikolasovtic8312]

@@2010Zanoza2 Casual AMD fanboy. I have a Ryzen aswell and these are both good processors imo.

[@ellypsis603]

direct competitor is 14600K

[@miraculoustalesofladybugca2028]

❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤

[@Pawcio2115]

Compare it to the 14600k

[@АнастасияЛагно-й4л]

12400f win😊

[@CarFlightGamesCFG]

Esse teve um bom salto de performace em relação a geração passada.

[@kevinyoliveira68]

kkkkkkkkkkkkkk

[@kevinyoliveira68]

Linha K competindo com a linha non-K? Como isso é evolução não viu o MSRP de ambos?

[@Savi159]

Just buy an i7 14700k instead of that lol

[@pppp0821]

얼마나 쓰레기면 전세대 논K랑 비교를 하냐

[@Maxssson]

💙💛💯✌

[@ТимурТимерханов-р1р]

12400=14400

[@Tifeejanz]

Guys look at the Power Consumption before commenting

[@Гнг6нн7778пжшшшшшшн]

Пппррн😮

[@АнастасияЛагно-й4л]

12400f win😊