Origins: Surprise, the Bible Explains That!

[@eddiegood1776]

Really like the way you explain things Jay. Bless you bro.

[@waitingandwatching9328]

Awesome information ... at times like these I am even more proud to be a Christian. Thank you.

[@themaradonas7694]

Love this videos their amazing!!!! Only one thing I ask is for Spanish subtitles so I can share on our ministry page!!! God bless😍

[@bluxontal3757]

Bendición Laura! Creo que hay software que puede hacer eso, no en la mejor calidad pero ayuda. Solo que no te puedo decir cual es, lo se por mis sobrinos.

[@JohnHMarsden]

Thank you so much.

[@loretta62baca]

I love you My Heavenly Father and your son and my Lord and Savior Jesus Christ Amen.

[@fxsrider]

Thank you my son.

[@johnharrison5656]

@@fxsrider That's blasphemy!

[@fxsrider]

@@johnharrison5656 Telling a non existing entity how much you love them on a youtube message board is odd. Blasphemy? Who got hurt? You? or a god?

[@johnharrison5656]

@@fxsrider Blasphemy is claming to be God or someone forgiving the sins of another . I do agree that it's odd and I'm pretty sure God would much rather the person talk to him. All I have to say regarding your comment that God doesn't exist is for your sake it would be best if you were right!

@ Retta Baca Yup tell us how much you love him when he blesses you with Breast Cancer.

[@MrWeezer55]

I really need you to do a series on how the Bible explains Superconductivity in Rohmbohedral Trilayer Graphene.

[@worldonfire6154]

There's one thing I find interesting about the question "When will Christ return?". There're very few major arguments for those who say He won't return soon (like soon soon) including "People have thought he would return in their time for 2000 years". Then there's at least one so-called prophecy (meaing I only know one, there might be more) about this saying that it would still take quite a long time, but I think this one is not authentic. Anyway there are always a lot of prophecies floating around which cannot be all true. So this is not really a reliable argument and prophecies have to be checked carefully anyway. Then there's the "He could come anytime" argument, but that is overlooking the facts - there's more than one biblical hint about when He will return. And kind of all of them point to 'This train is getting faster'. And whenever I hear somebody talking about this I get new evidence. I didn't notice this one before for example, I just read it like "there will be some heresies" without looking at them strait forwardly. But actually, many heresies depicted in Scripture (even those one might think refer to the past) are alive (again) today. And this is by far not the only evidence.

[@alwaysovercomingbear4809]

Wow, what great information.... the part about epigenetics makes me curious about my kids and how our experience as their parents, may have affected them. When I was 7.5months pregnant with our first son, my husband was electrocuted at work. (he was dead for over 5 minutes and was left brain injured, although he "recovered.") I immediately went into labor, the doctors were able to medically postpone the birth by 3 weeks, but our son was born almost a month and a half premature. Also, I've always wondered if and how my husband's extremely elevated electricity levels, within his body, have affected our growing children. Very interesting information.

[@lazyh-online4839]

Epigenetics doesn't quite work like that. To begin with your body only carries "higher levels of electricity" while you're being electrocuted, it's not as if ones body maintains "high levels" of electricity after the fact, it's not a substance that can be stored, something has to generate that electricity. Now the experience may be expressed in epigenetic changes that could be passed down to your children but I'd recommend reading a science journal on the subject to learn more about the kind of changes that can be passed down.

[@dariancurtis]

I believe in the ancient Hebrew view of the universe. In doing this, it totally explains what the Bible is saying.

[@worldonfire6154]

I wonder though, how Chimps have a huge genetic variety. How many of them survived the flood? Two I guess for they are to be classified unclean according to the law of Moses. This would be an interesting question.

[@rizaljose8531]

I love this channel!!!!

[@lazyh-online4839]

I know, the fact that they're serious just makes it that much funnier! 🤣

[@user-xs5fj3ms2l]

Genesis 1:7 is a great insight on the flood. According to this verse, if we could get into a rocket and travel a few billion times the speed of light and not hit anything, we would eventually run into water. That is the great deep Chapter 7:11 "The windows of heaven" might actually be literal.

[@guyatkins9482]

Evolution is a religion based on faith

[@davidedwinroy4446]

When a good Jesus came to tell the truth about creation, the creator, who He is, what is life, how to live happy, things n evil to avoid, it was totally ignored by foolish n arrogant men with their own agenda who still live today coz The Bible n Jesus dont suit their lifestyle n agenda. Full stop. We hv sad people who would rather comment n argue than to believe n live in harmony n peace. To all mankind, may Christ n His love be with us all.

[@electricboogie709]

Great channel!

[@dco8886]

Nice information! Very insightful. Love how he used all secular studies 😂

[@worldonfire6154]

Wait a minute. In summer 2014, I was ending year (AE: grade) 5 at school. In year 7 or 8 we delt with plate tectonics and vulcanos ect. NOT A WORD about water under the earth's surface. WHY, SCHOOL, WHY?

[@thewhole_picture1743]

Underground oceans... "And it came to pass after seven days, that the waters of the flood were upon the earth. In the six hundredth year of Noah’s life, in the second month, the seventeenth day of the month, the same day were all the *fountains* *of* *the* *great* *deep* broken up, and the windows of heaven were opened." (Genesis 7:10-11).

[@Seven67.]

Sir pls translate ur videos to indian language Tamil... Because we are interested to know about the truth....

[@thewhole_picture1743]

You could copy and paste subtitles into Google translate.

[@sapereaude6339]

yolanda jerginson You want to find a myth just look at the big bang buddy.

[@sapereaude6339]

yolanda jerginson and you haven’t refuted one argument that was in this video

[@jimscobie6646]

If you want truth, you should stick with science.

[@doodles8966]

If you understand English and Tamil you can be someone to tell others the scientific facts you learn.That helps prove the Bible to others. But the truth of how to put on Christ is the most important part that everyone needs to study.

[@AgTeacherCheryl]

Amazing information! The sins of the father has shown through time to include alcohol and drug abuse showing up for generations in addiction related diseases and disabilities. Now with epigenetics we can see evidence of how it develops! My mother in law knew nothing of DNA or genetics, but she taught exactly this! Her beliefs were based on scripture, now the science supports it!

[@lazyh-online4839]

But lots of religions made this "prediction". I think it's more of an observation than a prediction.

[@BigKWS]

@@lazyh-online4839 Lots of religions? Which ones? Please quote the specific verses.

[@fxsrider]

What about the science that launches rockets up into space? Firmament?

[@johnharrison5656]

@@fxsrider What about it?

[@jackyhenson3726]

God is science

[@cyhwh7378]

Nice video. Has anyone else wondered about Gen 2:21 where a rib was taken from Adam to create Eve. The original Hebrew word we see as rib, צלעה צלע, also means curve. A more accurate modern translation may be a DNA helix.

[@colindickson8034]

Yeah right.

[@wildchild00fu]

A rib is the only bone in people that can be removed and it grows back..

[@colindickson8034]

@@wildchild00fu and you have medical proof of this. On the other hand we can cure leprosy so that makes us divine.

[@jacob.tudragens]

@@colindickson8034 Simple Google search can find it, Einstein.

[@NoTrashInHeaven]

Thanks for that great explanation of epigenetics! It's been referenced in some healthy lifestyle videos I've watched lately, but I hadn't studied out yet what it is. That mouse experiment seems to validate what the bible says about generational impact of behavior- just seems common sense to be careful how we live, for ill or for good.

[@lazyh-online4839]

For the most part I agree, but it also validates the many other religions that show some form of passing down of traits from parent to child.

[@buckanderson8194]

If you were walking in a jungle and found a working computer just sitting there would you assume that it got there by itself or would it be evidence that someone must have put it there. By the same philosophy, given the complexity of life, why would we assume that we got here on our own instead of seeing our existence as evidence that we were put here intentionally?

[@AM-qv9yf]

This kind of logic does not sink in to the atheist. Or other sceptics

[@bethnahreen1]

They would say it took 3 million years for that computer to be created by evolution.

[@joymeyer4730]

If Eve was created "hours after Adam", why does Adam say in Genesis 2:23 " At long last" referencing Eve arrival? I'm a Christian, a believe the Bible is the true , error free~Word of God. I also believe that has man's can make mistakes in understanding the Bible. I also believe in the Big Bang and that the Bible also asserts this same super natural event. Genesis 1:1 In the beginning (Time) God created (Energy) the Heavens (Space) and Earth (Matter). I also believe that these two issues are not dependant on heaven or hell. I'm not dogmatic about these beliefs. I just think current science and scientific modeling and the Bible agrees more than some realize. God Bless All.

[@wildchild00fu]

I also believe in a big bang..its called fireworks it bangs and its big

[@isabelherndon933]

I've heard before about the bottleneck population of humans. But what about all the land animals? Wouldn't they also have to have bottlenecked at the same time? There were just saved seven pairs of clean animals and one pair of unclean animals on the ark.

[@faithtruth8036]

They should do I think, they would have a greater genetic variation from the start, humans only had two. This would help their variation but there has been a enormous amount of research put into humans compared to the animals perhaps more than all others combined it will be interesting to see what future research revels.

[@lazyh-online4839]

@@faithtruth8036 research shows the genetic diversity of either is too great for a flood event in the time frame suggested by the bible. In addition the animals that show a bottleneck do show it at the same time as humans but only in a specific location hat humans were in at the time, as well as giving geological evidence of volcanic activity being the reason for the bottleneck. None of the evidence support Noah's flood from the time frame, location, or the cause of the bottleneck, nor the population size during said bottleneck.

[@GORF_EMPIRE]

@@lazyh-online4839 Research lies a lot too. As time goes on, research has no choice but to adhere to what is actually observed. The bible has for millennia had the answers. The funny thing about today's 'science' is they have been handed a cheat sheet and refuse to use it.

[@lazyh-online4839]

@@GORF_EMPIRE "Research lies a lot too." I'll admit the results of research CAN be incorrect, but it's still the most reliable method we have aside from performing the experiments ourselves. Can you give any verifiable examples of this cheat sheet?

[@GORF_EMPIRE]

@@lazyh-online4839 Try watching this video again.

[@kkhinson4913]

Is God scientific? You got it! The devil must be trembling, science started started in the Garden of Eden. And knowing that the lower rib has the ability to regrow is the icing on the cake.

[@user-xs5fj3ms2l]

The scientist's world view is based on the five senses. They only believe what can be seen, heard, felt, or smelled and tasted. The Bible is an Eastern book and a spiritual book which must be known with spiritual insight. The secret is that God never contradicts the Bible or science. Yet science is always contradicting God.

[@kennithlambert2563]

Thanks FYI. Very interesting.

[@Xiphactinus6]

It seems like science discovers something, and then they say the Bible explains that, why does it never happen the other way around?

[@Tadrjbs]

Wow, What a TERRIFIC program! Praise Jesus!

[@alvaroovallecastrellon4187]

América is Father house ⭐

If the flood was not of water and was an allegory, could the "flood" be a flood of indo-europeans?

[@patrickmorand5189]

The firmament.separates the waters above from the waters below.

[@anthony639]

And something that can hold back water must be solid and or FIRMament

[@tbrown3356]

Yeah we ain't on no spinning ball whirling through space either. Earth is immovable and has foundations. Heliocentrism is a religion and false doctrine.

[@alvaroovallecastrellon4187]

Jesús is coming to south América ⭐

[@purrdiggle1470]

The population bottleneck from the Flood would have affected both humans and animals.

[@Joh2n]

Why are you a Christian, because it's true. God bless

[@kittysunshinebandit1235]

Didn't one of Noah's son marrie a woman from the land of Kaanan. And didn't God creat man in his likeness on the sixth day, when he created all living things. This would be the same people where one of Noah's Son's took in marriage a woman from the land of Kaanan. The same land that Kain went to when he was banshed by God for killing his brother Able. I'm not saying she was related to Kain. Then God rested on the Seventh day. Then on the eighth day God created Adam In His image. Then Adam maintaned the gareden of Eden and named all the beast and creatures. After, God saw Adam appear sad. So he placed Adam in a deep sleep and took a rib (DNA STAND) from Adam and dust from the earth and created Eve. There was one woman who was saved from the sixth day creation of man in God's likeness. Why are you leaving this all out. I just watched part of another video and they left all that out as well. It's all there in the Bible. Why leave it out.

[@MacedonianGrace]

And the Bible doesn't say that we live on a globe. Nice video.

[@benjaminmontoya8160]

Yes it does

[@MacedonianGrace]

@@benjaminmontoya8160 where?

[@jocknarn3225]

well uno, that's interesting; i understood from somewhere u need several (i think the number was 7 but u'd think even numbers would b the go) 4 a viable gene pool. So .. Noah & 7 others so states my Good News Bible edition. Real interesting

[@truethinker221]

With all these new ideas are you saying the earth was flooded by water 4,500 years ago ? This killed every living thing except what was kept on the Noah's Ark which floated on the sea which had risen to 30 feet above the highest mountains some 28,000 feet above the sea level we have now. ? When or what mouth did the ship run aground ?

[@lazyh-online4839]

I think it's interesting how they're saying a study proving a population in the thousands about 70,000 years ago somehow proves a population less than 10 about 6,000 years ago. This logic in this video has more holes than Swiss cheese.

[@truethinker221]

@@lazyh-online4839 That's because it comes from the holey bible.

[@tomjackson3411]

The Bible tells about the three ages. The first age was destroyed, and in the first age we were spiritual. Read the Old Testament in particular Job. Also, the ethnic races were created on the six day. You are leaving the eight day creation out where God created EthAdam which means a specific man, a man that blushes in the face, and the lineage of which Christ was born. Also, the Bible says that Eve was the mother of all living, and not the mother of all races. Eve is the mother of all living because she is the linage of which Christ would come, and through Christ all can have eternal life. Noah's flood the Bible says that there were two of every seed on that ship, so there would have been on the ship the six day creation. Also, One has to understand that the Bible is about a particular family, and only deals with the ethnic races when they come in to contact with each other. The Bible is a amazing book but it takes study to understand this book, and Christ also says I have told you everything. Why do you not understand? You and I don't understand because we will not take the time to learn the Bible. A Caucasian cannot have a black baby just a black person cannot have a Chinese baby. So, if you are knowledgeable in DNA you should know these things. Our DNA is different Right? The more we study the Bible the more we will know. There are people that are directly related to Jesus Christ, and these are the chosen people which consist of 12 tribes. But the arabic race also has 12 tribes, and the ethnic races also have the Elect just as the chosen ones have the Elect which were chosen in the first age, and justified in the first age. You can read about those that were choses, and justified in different places such as Romans Chapter 8. God Bless.

[@alamotte2005]

I've talked to another person who read Genesis 1&2 this way as well. He was very defensive and quite hateful, so I couldn't get much knowledge out of him. But if you don't mind answering I would like to know how you read a few things. Starting with Genesis 2:4 These are the generations of the heavens and the earth when they were created, in the day that the Lord God made the earth and the heavens. It seems to me the Bible is going back over creation in more detail. How do you read that? Continuing on Genesis 2:5-24 Reads to me like it is starting at the beginning of day three. 'When no bush of the field was yet in the land' It also says God had not caused it to rain, but there was a mist watering the whole face of the ground. And there was no 'man' to work the ground. This is just my opinion and could be completely wrong but it reads to me like God planted the earth on day three. And 'created' the Garden in Eden on day 6 after He created Man. Verse 7 says he creates man and he became a living creature. He then causes the garden to 'spring up'(instantly). He places him in Eden to work in the garden, and creates woman from him. I've always read Chapter 2 as a second look. If there were immortal people with souls on the earth before Adam and Eve, why would God create Adam and Eve's to rebel and destroy that? And then save people through their lineage? Or do you think everything was corrupted before Adam and Eve? These are sincere questions if you have time to respond.

[@tomjackson3411]

@@alamotte2005 The Bible says the devil rebelled in the first age, and a third of the angels followed him. Just as the devil corrupted the first age he is also trying to do to this age. Adam and Eve were beguiled by the serpent, the devil that old dragon, The devil was trying to destroy the lineage of Adam and Eve of which Christ would come. That happened on several occasions when the angels left the place of habitation Gen 6, and JUde tells about the fallen angels, and from these came the giants. Sometimes people want to argue but the best way for you to make up your mind is to listen to Shepherd's Chapel which teaches all this chapter to chapter verse to verse. You can make up your own mind. I do know that the churches don't teach the Bible, and after you study with Shepherd's Chapel for a while you will realize this. The most important thing is for people to get involved in their Bible and study every day. Why? Because that is how we are spiritually fed, and that is as important as feeding the flesh. God Bless.

[@alamotte2005]

@@tomjackson3411 Thanks, I will check into Shepherd's Chapel.

[@mikewilliams4717]

All myths told by other cultures. Nice fairytale though, almost like the tooth fairy.

[@alamotte2005]

@@mikewilliams4717 That's incredible Mike. The History channel has taught you well.

[@raouldemer2300]

"Scientists discoveries are close to the scriptures and it makes them nervous" talking about Adam and Eve. Sure, scientists just discovered that the Adam and Eve myth is true and try to hide it. These guys are very funny.

[@jackyhenson3726]

God is science

[@mikewilliams4717]

Which god?? There are so many to choose from.

[@jackyhenson3726]

Williams whatever god makes the most sense to you

[@randydittmer627]

2nd peter 3;5 is speeking of the great flood that was used to cleanse the earth by GOD and is a warning to those who do not believe in the second comming that nthe earth will be cleansed by fiery judgement as seen in revelations. do not be fooled by this false teaching and be faithful always in the word and not be dependant upon what others teach, even me

[@teddyquinones4234]

Randy Dittmer What is speeking?

[@tbrown3356]

@Richard Fox Not if you understand the need to rid the world of evil. It then sounds more like justice and salvation. You too could be saved if you repent and believe that Jesus died for your sins.

[@tbrown3356]

@Richard Fox God made you and he has given his son to die for everyone's sins, so that none should perish. The choice is yours.

[@mymomymo8433]

i hope this kind of information will distroy the ethiest society which dows not believe in God

[@norbertjendruschj9121]

The "ethiest" society is roaring with laughter about this dishonest bullshit.

[@super_ficial]

Didn't God say "Let US make man in OUR own image?" US means God is not alone and OUR means more than one God. Could it be that man has only one true father (The one who created us) but that there are other Gods, maybe with their own children on some other world ? Could you imagine all of eternity with no one of equal intelligence to talk to.

[@rodderick1983]

God in that context was Elohim meaning a counsel or builders who carry out the order (what’s said). You’ll see the builders (bane) throughly scripture with sometimes God having a different definition if you use strongs concordance.

[@MrGilfred]

The bible is just telling us what God has said about the earth from the very beginning in Genesis 1:1. That doesn't say anything about the beginning of the universe. This doesn't mean that God created the earth first. Because that would mean that the water on the earth would be too cold to remain in liquid form. God still created the sun first the the earth. God created a water canopy that was outside of Earth's atmosphere

[@PortmanRd]

Surprised? No! Far from suprised.

[@danielhanawalt4998]

In the beginning human DNA was perfect and in no way corrupted. Sin corrupted the DNA. Seems science is proving that. Things one generation does can effect following generations. It's been a bit problematic for me that my children would be punished for my sins. That said, would it be possible or likely that if children broke from the sins of the father, say smoking, that they would be as harmed by the habit as the father or mother and likewise their children would also be healthier? I think yes, definitely. At least over time the effects of smoking would diminish in future generations.

[@4give5ess]

How desperate do you have to be to replace Truth with your belief about Truth? Watch the video.

[@buckanderson8194]

One thing that science recently discovered but was already known in the Bible is that snakes used to have legs. The Bible gives us a general description of the creation of the universe. Science seeks a detailed description. I love truth so naturally I love the Bible but I also love science. Le'Maitre, the guy who first theorized the big bang, was a Catholic priest who said that he wanted to know the truth and that there were two paths to find it, the Bible and science, he chose both. I am the same way. Science tries to prove or disprove God by looking at the evidence given in nature. Thing is that since God existed before the universe it is either all evidence of God or none of it is. I believe it is all evidence of God.

[@norbertjendruschj9121]

" Science tries to prove or disprove God by looking at the evidence given in nature." Actually science is not interested in God. God is supernatural, the field of science is the natural world. A conflict is only created (sorry for the pun, I couldn´t resist), if people stick to a literal interpretation of the Bible and deny or ignore facts. I still wonder why this is such a big problem in the US and nowhere else.

[@joelm6780]

So does evolution!!

[@insightfullysaid]

"Genetic Adam" was Noah.

[@AM-qv9yf]

Adam means man. So all men are Adams

[@AM-qv9yf]

@@jameskguy Yea , well getting the timelines right makes all the difference.

[@KYMCgabrielbituin]

Too far away about the origin of the ocean.

[@matthightower4204]

Science says you ancestors are mokeys.

[@gunnerapple6173]

Science fiction

[@tbrown3356]

Don't confuse science which is a systematic way to validate cause and effect through experimentation. Pseudoscientists are religious zealots that make up stories and brainwash kids into believing they came from monkeys. Not all science is bad, and not everyone claiming science actually uses science.

[@gunnerapple6173]

@@tbrown3356 good comment

[@gowdsake7103]

Surprise the buybull offers NO evidence AT ALL !

[@ohiobuckeye5828]

@Gowd With comments like yours...do you expect anyone to take you seriously?

[@gowdsake7103]

@@ohiobuckeye5828 Really ? you take an iron age book written by people who thought wheels were high tec seriously ! ha ha ha

[@ohiobuckeye5828]

@Gowd *Citations needed*

[@gowdsake7103]

@@ohiobuckeye5828 Citations for what ? The buybull ?What do ya want to show where it is provably wrong, immoral, barking mad ?

[@ohiobuckeye5828]

On your assertion that the writers of the bible thought wheels were high tech. As to your other assertions....I would run out to of snickers bars before you got around to proving them.

[@patrickjohnson7592]

The Bible, is Reliable, from God The Bible, shows, that The Earth, was under water. It was brought up, from. Under water.

[@linzzzzfaust9766]

They make sure it happens that waymystery book full of paraboles

[@amattei6032]

scientist who believes in creationism? science against the bible? sorry i'm in the wrong place I WAS searching for knowledge not indoctrination.

[@chasestachelek7799]

Try a book, not KZbin then

[@eckyhen]

We reject 99.9% of science but agree with the bits that can be interpreted to match our beliefs.

[@nancyking2867]

God created science, just like he created everything else.

[@2fast2block]

@@nancyking2867 absolutely. We can't get the laws of nature without a Lawgiver. We can't get a creation of the universe without God.

[@dmajones4874]

There is no outerspace it is a lie

[@robertcampbell6349]

Idiot.

[@ryanehlis426]

Earth is Flat geostationary plain

[@robertcampbell6349]

@@ryanehlis426 And you're an idiot too.

[@k0smon]

Water can be formed under ground just like oil is. Just hydrogen and oxygen combined.

[@truethinker221]

You two are kidding .

[@randydittmer627]

the holy spirit is speeking through the authur

[@teddyquinones4234]

KJV is the best explanation!!! All other Biblical interpretations are all wrong! Listen to Dr. Gene Kim from Berkeley University & he explains better than you!

[@franklix]

Still does not explain where all those other people came from for Cane and Able to find wives

[@mikeadams6108]

He married his sister... you cannot miss the scripture in Genesis 5:4 "And he had other sons and daughters". It's really very simple when you read and think about it.

[@tomcogar851]

franklix sister, nieces, great nieces... they lived much longer. Keep asking questions 🤔 , some answers are not obvious, and sometimes the translations make it confusing- hope your trust in God grows with each answered question.

[@truethinker221]

@@tomcogar851 He married a woman who lived in the land of Nod. Or wait how do we know he got married ?

[@mikewilliams4717]

Which god?

[@truethinker221]

@@mikewilliams4717 Aa the one the video is about.

[@randymccall304]

Wako

[@chrisbrooks4032]

Ignorance and arrogance combined. It's comedy.

[@rumpestillskin4671]

WHAT A BUNCH OF BS FROM THE BUY BULL.

[@Anthony_Gx]

Rump[e Stillskin great contribution! Thanks for your comment and the interesting content in it. Wish you had shared more of your view on this so we could understand more of the evidence that points to a contrary strain of events than the arguments explain in this video. 100 years ago, scientists thought the people 200 years ago were stupid and still kinda primitive. They knew how to make planes of cardboard and drained someone of all his blood. Today we know better and see them as ignorant. We laugh at those who “knew” the earth was flat. And in 2230, people will look at our time and they won’t be able to imagine we actually believe some of the things we proudly teach in schools and think we know. The only thing that is actually really evolving... is science itself. We keep discovering things we didn’t understand, only to raise more questions and decades later realize we overlooked critical things back then when we thought we had it all figured out. Understanding that and not living in the illusion that somehow our generation knows it all.. is smart. Having an open perspective and unbiased approach to different theories, is necessary to unravel the real truth. The earth was 2 billion years old a century ago. 1 billion years old 45 years before that. 500 million years old in the 17th centurie and 34 million years old in 1620. Yes in the middle ages it was taught that our planet was several 100-thousands years old. In the last 3 thousand years we’ve discovered fire, domesticating animals, clothing, farming, scripts and alfabets, tables, the wheel, horse-carriages, bikes, electricity, phones, camera’s, cars, planes, medicines, governments, juristrictions, internet, space travel etc. And you think we’ve been here for hundreds of millennia? We should’ve been able to travel to other galaxies by now. It would’ve been credible if we’ve found massive amounts of fossils and skeletons of people and animals and plants. Having thousands of species that are links in evolution, crossing from fish with fins to mammal or bird with half wing or leg. And yet....there’s not even one !! Just small horse, medium horse, large horse. Like there still are today. And everything evolved... but crocodiles..somehow stayed the same. They don’t know how to keep raccoons from stealing and eating their eggs after “millions of years” - but they are somehow not changing. Really... If the Bible was wrong, it would’ve been proven by now. Yet it’s full of facts that science confirms centuries after. One small example before I go: in the Middle Ages the Spanish flu broke out, killing around (I think it was ..) 2-5% of the population. Almost none of the Jews got sick, so the people figured it had to be an evil trick the Jews created to attack the non-Jews. So they kicked them out of the Iberian peninsula. How did the Jews escape this highly contagious pandemic? By listening to God ;) they followed Gods commands from the Bible, so they washed their hands before eating, sleeping and after waking up. After touching the dead. Before preparing food. This may seem very logical to us, but in that time... if you said there were millions of small animals, invisible to the eye, living on your hands - people would think you’re delusional and you’d probably be hanged. People didn’t know anything about bacteria or micro organisms back then. And the Bible is full of scientific facts we’ve only discovered recently. From earth with a clear sky and true darkness, a maximum of around 12.400 stars can be seen with the naked eye. Yet the Bible tells us the stars are more in number than all the grains of sand on all the beaches of earth. Don’t discard something so quickly without actually researching it for yourself dude !

[@fxsrider]

Secular scientists? Are there any other kind?

[@NOTTHASAME]

Scientific views does not associate with the bible , in fact they try to get it as far away as possible.

[@colindickson8034]

Truth is truth Fiction is fiction. So your point being?

[@ibperson7765]

Please go back and tell the Christian founders of nearly every single field of science that. Oh, and mention it to the Christian inventor of the scientific method too.

[@jimscobie6646]

Big Foot is real!

[@2fast2block]

Did that make you feel smart? What about orgasm?

[@jimscobie6646]

@@2fast2block .... huh?

[@2fast2block]

@@jimscobie6646 more knowledge from the genius who watched this video and it's content was all wiped out with, "Big Foot is real!" now has more knowledge in answering me with, ".... huh?" Gee, you're just a wealth of knowledge. Can't wait to see what you fart out of your dumb ass next.

[@MsKwenchi]

The Bible contradicts the "universe"

[@sapereaude6339]

Jaye Bea how so?

[@nancyking2867]

Jaye Bea Colossians 1:15-17 15 Who is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of every creature: 16 For by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by him: and for him: 17 And he is before all things, and by him all things consist. KJV

[@grasonicus]

How could the Y-chromosome Adam who became the father of all the living and the mitochondrial Eve who became the mother of all the living have lived at different times? After all, we all know how babies are made. The bloke with the yellow tie should keep quiet more of the time.

[@bluxontal3757]

Precisely! LOL! "Adam´s seed" probably remained frozen during the ice ages. Then Eve by some huuuuge coincidence sat on the rock where Adam had left it to freeze, BUT precisely on the moment the sun was warming it up...

[@carpejkdiem]

They didn't say here. Where'd you come off with that.

[@grasonicus]

I can't remember if they referred to the anthropological believe that Y-chromosome Adam and mitochondrial Eve lived long time periods apart, but that is the belief among those who now believe in Y-chromosome Adam and mitochondrial Eve but don't believe the Bible.

[@MarkProffitt]

There was a single male ancestors more recently than a single female ancestor. More women at the time there was one man that everyone is related to. The Bible, and many other cultures', describe this happening during a global flood. Noah is the "genetic Adam" because all 3 of his sons are related to him. The single female ancestor of the wives of Noah's sons was actual Eve, thus earlier.

[@ibperson7765]

@@grasonicus Yeah it seems unlikely, although is possible. Certainly Biblically it is: Noah is the single male ancestor but the wives of his sons were all from different ancestors. So Noah would be the last common male ancestor but Eve would be the last common female ancestor. For scientists who don’t believe the Bible, there would still have to be a situation where the kids of some man or woman were the inly ones that survived, but he or she procreated with multiple partners. Odd theory if secular.

[@michealonghocklye]

There no mars in bible

[@trailblazing2576]

God have mercy for that soul

[@truethinker221]

@@trailblazing2576 There's no bible in bible.

[@trailblazing2576]

@@truethinker221 we are all doomed

[@truethinker221]

@@trailblazing2576 The gospel of gloom and doom.

[@fxsrider]

Scientists are unsure of where the water came from? Isn't that the very reason goat herders wrote the bible stories to explain where water came from? Because they had no idea themselves? Makes sense.

[@carpejkdiem]

fxsrider The CREATOR MOST HIGH let it be known dork! You with the muse that makes us sick satanic industry as your god and his ministers who praise him for you.

[@fxsrider]

What's the creator in your particular fantasy look like?

[@grasonicus]

@fxsrider What you say is just speculation. It is a delusion that one can derive truth from speculation. Read a few books on logic and you will see that. If you know enough about probability, information and code, especially encoded information, you will see that a creator is necessary.

[@fxsrider]

What seems more likely? A magic man with no origins did it? Or comets full of water blasted the planet for eons?

[@grasonicus]

@fxsrider "seems" Again, speculation. Make no mistake, it's not evidence that drives you but your atheism.

[@louisbauer8669]

Such nonsense.

[@GORF_EMPIRE]

Explain.

[@louisbauer8669]

@@GORF_EMPIRE Nonsense? Biblical fantasy.

[@GORF_EMPIRE]

@@louisbauer8669 Yawn.

[@louisbauer8669]

@@GORF_EMPIRE So true, maybe those dreams you just woke up from.

[@GORF_EMPIRE]

@@louisbauer8669 More like the boredom I get from such glib and childish attempts at rebuttal.