Course : Systemverilog Verification 2 : L5.2 : Interfaces and Modports in Systemverilog

[@udayshankar1986]

Very well explained...Clarified all my doubts....Tq u!! Keep doing the videos...............They might be so much helpful for someone like me who are not interested in reading boring books...

[@SystemverilogAcademy]

Thanks for the feedback!

[@Narennmallya]

Tysm for these videos sir. Helped me a lot 😀

[@SystemverilogAcademy]

Thank you for the feedback 🙂

[@Nipulpatel143_all]

Amazing

[@SystemverilogAcademy]

Thank you for the feedback 🙂

[@vonAdieux]

in 3:42, where does that .request signal come from?

[@SystemverilogAcademy]

Sorry, it' s a mistake, it should have been some signal defined in the interface. Thank you for pointing out 🙂

[@Shahidsoc]

i think u want to use ready@@SystemverilogAcademy

[@MK-mf2vu]

hi thank you..nice video...

[@SystemverilogAcademy]

Thank you for the feedback!

[@kellypainter7625]

Nice video but I don't understand why you need 3 clocking blocks when they all have the same offsets relative to the input clock. Maybe that is explained in another video? I gather that is for verification and I don't know a lot about that topic.

[@SystemverilogAcademy]

All 3 clocking blocks (CB) have same skew (default input#1step output#0;) and this will be the case of most of the CBs used in the TB. The same interface can be used in a master driver/slave driver and in a monitor as well.We need 3 clocking blocks to use it under different mode of operations. Note that the direction of signals in each CBs are different. Eg: awid is output in a master, input in slave and again input in a monitor. Finally thanks for the feedback :)

[@mrinalgupta1564]

How are you accessing request at 3:21 without simple_interface's object?

[@SystemverilogAcademy]

When you will use INTERFACE.MODPORT intf_inst in the interface instance declaration, that's similar to using INTERFACE intf_inst . Then you will access interface signals with this instance handle like intf_inst.signal

[@ahmadfahad6034]

While instantiation shouldn't you have used the name of the interface axi_wr_addr_intf instead of "simple interface"?

[@SystemverilogAcademy]

Yes you are right Ahmad. Its a typo at kzbin.info/www/bejne/aKGYopeqlMqAg8U Thanks for the correction.