Is Linkedin Automation Illegal?

[@jasonhiggins.3853]

Dude automation is the future, its now. You can still spam people without automation tools. This is how linkedin works, people dont have time to sit and manually send requests etc to everyone. Everyone spams everyone on these platforms, this is how it is. Why would anyone in their right mind sit for countless hours manually contacting people when they can automate it????? C. C. if you set your automation up correctly, use it correctly then its very powerful. I would rather be sitting having a coffee while my automation is running by itself rather than sitting manually messaging people while trying to have a coffee. C.C you need to get with the program...its 2021 not 1990..

[@jdstarek]

This isn't about trust or personal interaction or spam...LinkedIn sells InMail. This is about LinkedIn wanting you to pay THEM for the right to spam people using their in-house automation. No more, no less. The services aren't causing a problem, they are simply diverting revenue away from LinkedIn. Honestly, if LinkedIn REALLY wanted to improve the platform, they'd eliminate InMail.

[@johnadair4979]

Very good advice.

[@AlexeyShort]

Wrong

[@CovetedConsultant]

What's wrong about this video? Help me understand your point of view.

[@AlexeyShort]

@@CovetedConsultant 100 best customers idea wrong. Read Byron Sharp. Automation idea from perspective of better customers wrong too. Brands and businesses growing 47% more effective by acquisition of new types of clients. Automation allows you to do this easilly. Also Linkedin rules and policies are not for your sake. It is for Linked In sake. Best of all to have mail list and phone numbers and have conversations to your potential customers (in a 2-3 year cycle and 1-6 month cycle are different clients). Automation done correct allows you to multiply your chances.

[@kiattat4409]

@@AlexeyShort well said