This professor is the greatest. He should teach other professors how to teach a course.
@151kkk8 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much! Our professor just opens up a big chunk of equation on the slide. He tells us to write it down and he gets angry if we ask a question. He just says 'its on the slide if you read it you'll get your answer.' I wish my professor could teach like you. You are very dedicated to your job. I wish you all the best!
@CPPMechEngTutorials8 жыл бұрын
You're welcome!
@wilsonmujang17707 жыл бұрын
Same goes to my lecturer. He can't even explained how it's work and the concept.
@sudetoprak67476 жыл бұрын
dersi verdinmi şuan :D
@muhammedeminural33334 жыл бұрын
Bizim hocayı özetledin, hatta soruyu ben sormuştum sınıfta, acaba aynı hocadan mı alıyoruz diyeceğim ve şimdi yazarken farkettim 3 yıl önce yazmışsın :D
@crazyworld30783 жыл бұрын
You have a gift.. 💜 💜 One of the best teachers I've ever seen, the professor in my university just talk like a parrot doesn't describe the basic but just gives the equations, I have exams tomorrow and I was lost.. You saved me, thank you.. You are a great teacher.. Stay healthy and happy.. Your students are the luckiest to have you.. 💜 💜 💜 💜
@CPPMechEngTutorials Жыл бұрын
They certainly are. :D
@mini_Ru5 жыл бұрын
I felt so stupid learning from my professor i didn't understand anything not even from the book, and then i found you and now everything is so easy .... Thank you you made me not want to quit
@CPPMechEngTutorials5 жыл бұрын
We understand what you wrote. Keep working at engineering!
@shalawali98366 жыл бұрын
You may have created these videos to improve your canal but I think they make justice on earth. Thanks for your hard working.
@CPPMechEngTutorials6 жыл бұрын
We made the videos to help out students and students around the world. The internet is an amazing tool. :)
@Hindi_poetry3 жыл бұрын
@@CPPMechEngTutorials god bless u all ,, all the team which work behind this series of lecture lots of love ,,best hope ,prosperity and peace to u all guys ,,great job thank you
@jong75135 жыл бұрын
This was great. We need to clone this guy.
@RDayan9322 жыл бұрын
Why does the free surface have a velocity of 0 at 1:00:00 in? wouldn't the water be moving downward since the water is falling out the bottom?
@hootcheetoh3729 Жыл бұрын
Why didn't the professor assume exit pressure to be atmospheric Pressure at 14.7 Psi
@pananaweKing7 жыл бұрын
U save me although i got 3 hrs before exam this means a lot for me. i fully understand what fluid talk about now. come at me wherever u want test paper XD
@crankfrank32743 жыл бұрын
Dr John Biddle is phenomenal
@destro445011 ай бұрын
Thank you very much it a blessing to havefound this channel
@larrya.46473 жыл бұрын
This guy is a LEGEND
@rllrll95123 жыл бұрын
I hated this lectures for the purpose of revision only ( graduated already). Too much parameters and equations in each class. But i cannot ignore his talent in teaching.
@GyeonghunPyeon3 жыл бұрын
베르누이 방정식을 경험적으로는 이해를 하고 있었습니다. 또 최종적인 식도 알고 있었지만 그 유도에 관해서는 모르고 있었습니다. 이 영상 덕분에 베르누이 방정식의 유도를 자세히 알게 된 것 같아 기분이 좋습니다.
@alejandrovillarreal7975 Жыл бұрын
At 1:00:13 where does the 144 come from?
@theefficentpiggie8577 Жыл бұрын
great lectures... Where does the 144 come from in the final example. 1:01:00
@CPPMechEngTutorials Жыл бұрын
There are 144 square inches per 1 square foot.
@matthewmolinar3 жыл бұрын
this man is a god
@johnpaulkiggundu9473 Жыл бұрын
Thank you very much Mr.Biddle This was very good content and you've delivered it ultimately
@CPPMechEngTutorials Жыл бұрын
You're welcome!
@rtrt28893 жыл бұрын
Biddle is the greatest!
@vivekashish78975 ай бұрын
Plz explain at stagnation point v is 0 then why take the dynamic pressure term
@catherinesc886 жыл бұрын
i can't differentiate between the partial differential and differential @_@
@CPPMechEngTutorials6 жыл бұрын
Can you provide a timestamp where you are getting confused?
@scott3373 жыл бұрын
@@CPPMechEngTutorials @27:00 wthe equations on the right side board, you seem to change between partial and non partial differentials for no reason
@MrHellsing10554 жыл бұрын
56:13 Someone just made a sale on eBay (^:
@markmaldonado70448 жыл бұрын
Why did he multiply the pressure at point 1 by 144?
@CPPMechEngTutorials8 жыл бұрын
+Mark Maldonado Please provide the time where you see this. It is likely due to a conversion from psi to psf.
@jonathansnow62547 жыл бұрын
Its right at 1:00:05
@CPPMechEngTutorials7 жыл бұрын
Yup... looks like a conversion from psi (commonly used in industry) to psf. The specific weight and all the heights use feet. Aren't British/American units fun??
@syakirazmi50385 жыл бұрын
Yeah really fun. Feels bad for engineers in america to have to use imperial system.
@MrHellsing10554 жыл бұрын
Unit conservation in the wack system of measurement. 144 cm ^2 / 1 ft ^2
@evaristogabriel82083 жыл бұрын
why did we multiply 10 by 144?
@jonathansnow62547 жыл бұрын
Just out of curiosity, why is the differential area around 22:00 (dn)(dy) instead of (dn)(ds)? Also, thanks for the great videos.
@CPPMechEngTutorials7 жыл бұрын
Force is pressure times area. The area over which the pressure acts is dn times dy (out of the board). If we were examining the pressure force at the top of the fluid element we would use dn ds as the area.
@dianafregoso-sanchez92394 жыл бұрын
Thank you for asking.
@dianafregoso-sanchez92394 жыл бұрын
@@CPPMechEngTutorials Thank you for answering.
@ameliadilley50193 жыл бұрын
for the sum of forces in the S direction, why is there delta infront of m x s?
@3627336leo7 жыл бұрын
why the point 2 pressure is equal to atmosphere pressure? why not to analysis the normal line pressure?
@dombadger25314 жыл бұрын
Thank you very much for the video! I have a few trivia questions. 20:30 Does a_n(acceleration normal to the streamline) exist? According to the definition, velocity vector is tangent to streamline, which means zero velocity normal to the streamline, thus no acceleration normal to the streamline (a_n=0) 41:50 why streamlines are defined as "in a steady flow field"? I think that's different from the original definition of a streamline. 59:00 How to prove that point 1 and point 2 are on the same streamline?
@ΚουρήςΆγγελος4 жыл бұрын
there is accelaration normal to streamlines and that is becouse the velocity is vector quantity so when there is change in orbit even if you dont change the |velocity| you will have accelaration. A real life example is when you make a big turn with your car and even if you have steady velocity you can fell the accelaration your car does. Sorry for my english i hope i helped you.
@farhanshaikh88374 жыл бұрын
20:30 acceleration exist as the particle along the streamline will change it's direction 41:50 its Steady flow flied, but the Particle should be at steady state while applying the Bernoulli equation( obviusly in reality its particle should be moving... steady state of particle is just an assumption) 59:00 I'm not sure.. Itheory
@Krypt-yb7jd7 жыл бұрын
In the problem solved at the very end of the lecture, How can points 1 and 2 be considered as part of the same streamline? , which is a pre-requisite for applying Bernoulli's theorem.
@CPPMechEngTutorials7 жыл бұрын
Good question. You have to imagine that a small chunk of fluid slowly drifts toward the inlet of the pipe. As it descends, the pressure changes but velocity barely changes. However, as it nears the inlet of the pipe, its velocity will increase more and more. The Bernoulli equation is a special limiting case of the conservation of energy equation. It might make more sense when looking at the more general form of the equation (see the lectures on pipe flow).
@Krypt-yb7jd7 жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@UwinIquit5 жыл бұрын
Had a quiz question regarded if the Bernoulli equation is a case of the conservation of energy equation. The answer was false because it is viewed as conservation of mechanical energy.
@vinr11874 жыл бұрын
@33.35 = I am getting confused with the direction of the force. We use ( P+change in P) as positive in the positive s direction but looking at the timestamp it's the opposite as the arrow pointing rightward is showing as negative where I think it should be positive ? Please help.
@ogheneruonainkori80673 жыл бұрын
I don't know if you still need this tho but here goes nothing.. First d direction only shows how the Pressure forces act on The differential element.. The magnitide (P+ dP) is bigger still than (P - dP) .. This verifies the fact that the Pressure increased over a change. Only that this bigger pressure seems to act towards negative x- axiz.. Because pressure is & must be compressive on an element.
@hari.santoso3 жыл бұрын
A question : (last example) Why is flowing into the atmosphere causes P2 to be 0?
@justinkeszthelyi18623 жыл бұрын
He could have left it P2 as atmospheric pressure, but would then have to use the absolute pressure instead of gauge pressure for P1. They would wind up canceling each other out regardless. He essential set the pressure datum Patm=0
@hari.santoso3 жыл бұрын
@@justinkeszthelyi1862 Well. Okay. Thanks for the answer
@chemicalengineeringbd76144 жыл бұрын
Thank you legend
@ex.martian5 жыл бұрын
Thank you sir!
@angrycloudofdogfood71283 жыл бұрын
Thank you !
@dremr20383 жыл бұрын
14:03 - 55:00
@DRoque147 жыл бұрын
Why did the professor consider at point 2 the pressure to be zero and not to be the atmospheric pressure? Sorry for my english.
@OsamaMohamed-nt3mk7 жыл бұрын
we deal with the pressure to be the Gage pressure (the pressure at point 1 is a Gage pressure ), so if u considered the pressure at point 2 to be the atmospheric pressure, then the pressure at point 1 will be the absolute pressure and u have to add the atmospheric pressure to it. as P(abs) = P(Gage) + P(atm)
@DRoque147 жыл бұрын
Thank you a lot!
@OsamaMohamed-nt3mk7 жыл бұрын
u r welcome :)
@DRoque147 жыл бұрын
Osama Mohamed just one more question, hope you can answer me. In linear momentum equation, when we consider gauge pressure to calculate the forces done by pressure, we can cut the term of the force of weight? Thanks again.
@OsamaMohamed-nt3mk7 жыл бұрын
i'm sorry, i haven't studied momentum equation yet.
@deborahnguy4 жыл бұрын
what textbook did he use?
@SeekTheTruthAndTruth4 жыл бұрын
Hi i was also wondering same :)
@azramangp3 жыл бұрын
Fundamentals of Fluid Mechanics, 7 Edition 2012 from Munson & Young. He noted in first lecture
@ameliadilley50193 жыл бұрын
in the example, for p1 why is 10 x 144?
@baqik2 жыл бұрын
could you figure it out why?
@baqik2 жыл бұрын
oh ok they mentioned about that at the comments below
@varunsubramanian54844 жыл бұрын
its way easier to derive bernoulli equation form the energy equation , instead of doing all this
@Octolev7 жыл бұрын
good stuff
@CPPMechEngTutorials7 жыл бұрын
Thanks.
@tajpa1005 жыл бұрын
Professor, I did not understand why dPs=(dP/ds)*(ds/2).Could you help me?
@AviadorRPrado4 жыл бұрын
Watch the class 1/34.
@imansalsa16547 жыл бұрын
at 44.30, what is the R ? is it the radius of something ?
@CPPMechEngTutorials7 жыл бұрын
It is the local radius of curvature of the streamline.
@Meeroo6705 жыл бұрын
O G, very helpful
@muhammadinamulhaq57863 жыл бұрын
at 30:33 ,from where did dz come from?
@CHERKE_JEMA55756 ай бұрын
That's the differential vector along the direction of the weight, and priorly we know it makes angle teta with the normal vector.
@muhammadinamulhaq57866 ай бұрын
@@CHERKE_JEMA5575 If you had replied earlier, this could have helped me pass my exam
@ferhuda53365 жыл бұрын
Why didn't you mention about rigid-body motion (Linear motion, rotation) at the end of the chapter 2?
@phillipvo45615 жыл бұрын
Yeah, can someone link us? I find that it is an important chapter.
@shaneskinner59754 жыл бұрын
@@phillipvo4561 kzbin.info/www/bejne/h2fWZKeNbpx_hKs The sound quality is poor, but the rest of his lectures are pretty good.