Very well explained, I am studying using the CQE Handbook, but you give the plus that I needed to understand the details, thank you.
@greenbeltacademy4 күн бұрын
Thanks Mike!
@CQEAcademy4 күн бұрын
You're welcome Mike!
@cesarhernandez48469 ай бұрын
I paid over $3000 usd for a this class in college, and it was not a good class. 18 minutes of this video, FREE, and I understand these charts better. thank you
@agintdrakalaiselvan4280 Жыл бұрын
This is the BEST video in internet to understand Attribute Charts with Examples. I wish i found this video first. Thanks
@saral20962 жыл бұрын
These videos are the best on KZbin. Thanks for the quality content and for helping me pass the green belt exam!
@CQEAcademy2 жыл бұрын
Wow thanks so much Sara!!! You're welcome!! By the way, for anyone else out there preparing for the green belt exam - check out greenbeltacademy.com!
@vlau332 жыл бұрын
You videos are always so clear and easy to understand - thank you so much for having created these videos and helping me study and understand various concepts for my lean six sigma green belt exam!!
@andyrobertson5662 жыл бұрын
You're welcome, and I appreciate the great feedback! Best of luck on your green belt exam!
@LuxmenMurugatheeswaran10 ай бұрын
I've been struggling to understand the charts and I finally found the right video. Thank you
@nguyenhoangtho26242 жыл бұрын
Million likes for your videos. Really appreciated.
@CQEAcademy2 жыл бұрын
Thanks Nguyen!
@TewodrosGetye Жыл бұрын
Nice presentation. I was very helpful.
@CQEAcademy Жыл бұрын
Thanks!
@satyathummala1381 Жыл бұрын
This vid is so underrated
@CQEAcademy Жыл бұрын
Wow, thanks so much Satya!
@user-yq9kr9sy9i2 жыл бұрын
This video is extremely useful.. It helped us with our tests.. thanks a ton!!
@CQEAcademy2 жыл бұрын
You're absolutely welcome, I'm glad the videos were so helpful!
@user-yq9kr9sy9i2 жыл бұрын
@@CQEAcademy honored by your reply.. could you please upload videos on two tailed F-tests or ANOVA please? With examples ..
@CQEAcademy2 жыл бұрын
@@user-yq9kr9sy9i Hey there K, I'll add an ANOVA video to the to-do list
@victorfonseca3063 жыл бұрын
Very well done explanation of attribute control charts..
@CQEAcademy3 жыл бұрын
Thanks Victor!!! i'm glad you liked it! -Andy
@TechLifeII2 жыл бұрын
I like all your content Andy, it's really helpful
@CQEAcademy2 жыл бұрын
Thanks so much!!!
@shaijukv1 Жыл бұрын
One of the best out of few I watched. Excellent explanation. Nicely done.
@TriquetraFlowArts Жыл бұрын
Would love a video on variable control chart types and how to choose between them! Love your videos
@CQEAcademy Жыл бұрын
Check out this video: kzbin.info/www/bejne/d5uanX2Ch5JqmJY
@attackN7 ай бұрын
This video was REALLY helpful and detailed, thanks
@CQEAcademy6 ай бұрын
Glad it was helpful!
@ravindrajoshi78 Жыл бұрын
Best Explanation, great job!!. Thank you!!
@awaisrajput00711 ай бұрын
Great. You made this so simple. 👌
@prabhakarann75413 жыл бұрын
Excellent explanation.Thank you very much
@CQEAcademy3 жыл бұрын
You're welcome Prabhakaran!!! -Andy
@markjosephlobete25633 жыл бұрын
Thank you Sir! Another great video
@CQEAcademy3 жыл бұрын
You're welcome!!!!!!
@NeerajSingh-hu9ut8 ай бұрын
Amazing content. Thanks for the video.
@airlanggak53913 жыл бұрын
really appreciate your efforts! thanks so much!
@CQEAcademy3 жыл бұрын
You're welcome!!!
@sivatejarajanenikkjvbmttvy87653 жыл бұрын
It was a really great explanation Thank You
@CQEAcademy3 жыл бұрын
I'm glad you liked it Siva!!! -Andy
@aybukesenem2 жыл бұрын
Thank you for detail information. How to determine process monitoring and control chart period ?
@CQEAcademy2 жыл бұрын
Hey There! Okay, so usually control charts should be considered an on-going process. Generally, you want to wait to collect around 25 sequential sub-groups of data before calculating control limits. Then, the frequency of which you collect another sub-group of data is really up to you.
@BobVanMol2 ай бұрын
Hi Andy, Thank you very much for your awesome efforts and contributions on helping and educating people through your SPC tutorials. Can you please explain the purpose of the UCL's and LCL's in your Np, P, C and U tutorial, as i always thought the UCL's/LCL's were determined from the customer? From your tutorial, the results will always show as "good"? Thank you.
@CQEAcademyАй бұрын
Great question!! Okay, so your customer always determines your specifications (USL / LSL). Your specification limits are not the same as your control limits. Your control limits reflect the natural variation in your process and are calculated based on that variation. The specification limits again come from the customer and should be based on the functionality / performance of the product and are not based on the process
@gouravsaini36552 жыл бұрын
Great explaination
@CQEAcademy2 жыл бұрын
Thanks!!!
@leozarkow279710 ай бұрын
This is by far the best explanation on Attribute Data Control Charts that I have managed to find - thank you!...But I wondered whether you could provide any further detail on exactly what we mean when we are talking about 'subgroups' / 'lots' - ideally with an example. I was initially thinking this could refer to aspects like 'factory location', or specific 'parts' (e.g parts of a car for 'defectives' example), but surely for the control chart to be plotting meaningful performance of a partcicular process over time, the data points need to be based on output of the same/comparable process?
@jitendranath40583 жыл бұрын
thank you for this video
@CQEAcademy3 жыл бұрын
you're welcome Jitendra!
@shadijalilvand84462 жыл бұрын
You really really help me thank you very much I have exam tomorrow 🤩🙏
@andyrobertson5662 жыл бұрын
You're welcome!!! I'm happy to help!
@Danielagostinho212 жыл бұрын
13:36 does that also apply to the other Attributes Data Control Chart?
@osteoprofitness2 жыл бұрын
Yes
@joeyreyyz6 ай бұрын
Hi Andy, on your discussion for u-chart, your UCL/LCL has n-bar but in other books I see its n(i), not n-bar. Could you clarify?
@annagkantia2403 Жыл бұрын
hey thanks for the video. where could I find the cheat sheet?
@CQEAcademy Жыл бұрын
You're welcome! You can find that resource here: cqeacademy.com/FreeCheatSheet
@timengsol9379 Жыл бұрын
Are the KZbin videos that you provide enough to pass the exam. I am definitely still considering doing your course asap, but I need some more information.
@andyrobertson566 Жыл бұрын
Hey There Timeng! so be honest, no, the youtube videos are not enough. I probably only cover 20% of the CQE body of knowledge for free here on KZbin. Which is why I recommend the course, which covers every topic, and gives you every resource you need to be successful on exam day!
@aru-kun_002 жыл бұрын
Wow easy to understand, Hey Sir, Could you calculate Process Capability for Attribute Data? (For C chart example)
@CQEAcademy2 жыл бұрын
Thanks Ardan! Yes, you can estimate process capability with discrete data - although that's probably a whole seperate video, but basically you estimate your DPMO, and most process capability tables correlate DPMO with Cpk
@yanivleopold52683 ай бұрын
great video. something i don't understand. don't i determine what USL and LSL are? why it determined by the results of the process?
@CQEAcademy3 ай бұрын
Great question, okay so think about how that calculation is made. We take the natural variation from the process itself, and we go out 3 standard deviations to create those upper/lower control limits. So we call those UCL/LCL the "Voice of the Process" because they reflect the natural variation in the process.
@Handle_brauche_ich_nicht Жыл бұрын
Hi, thank you for making these videos! Your videos are truly easily to understand and super well structured. One question: you mention that the NP & P Chart are based on binomial distributions and that C / U Chart are based on Poisson distribution. Why is that the case? It would be terrific to get any pointers here. Thank you again!
@CQEAcademy Жыл бұрын
Hey Andreas!! Great question, so the NP and P chart are based on the binomial distribution, because one of the assumptions is that there are a fixed number of outcomes to any experiment - and for control charts that means conforming or non-conforming. For a C / U chart, there can be multiple defects, which means that this assumption in the binomial distribution cannot be met, so we must move to the poisson distribution where multiple outcomes are possible (multiple defects per parts being inspected).
@maryambandarian97584 ай бұрын
Perfect
@CQEAcademy3 ай бұрын
Thank you!
@maherm.79663 жыл бұрын
Hi! I work in Healthcare Facility and we count the number of patients visit emergency department on monthly basis. Which type of control chart recommended to be used and what category these data is classified
@CQEAcademy3 жыл бұрын
Hey Maher, if you're just counting the number of patients visiting, this would be equivalent to counting defect items - 1 person is a single visitor. And since you're not really sampling, you're simply just counting, i'd use an NP chart. If you were trending the number of "ailments" per month, where one visitor could have multiple ailments, that would be like counting defects. -Andy
@rasha756911 ай бұрын
Thankyou
@PoojaPooja-im4rn2 жыл бұрын
Sir please explain scatter diagram from basic ,like which data is used for scatter diagram .how the 2 variables are correlated with each other ?
@CQEAcademy2 жыл бұрын
That's a good suggestion, I can add that to my to-do list.
@milatodosova62232 жыл бұрын
Hii. Your video is really great and extremely helpfull. I just wanted to ask you if you could tell me if there is any possibility to find real datasests from real companies to use for a calculation?
@CQEAcademy2 жыл бұрын
Hey Mila! Unfortunately most companies don't publish or share their SPC data, so I'm not aware of any real datasets to analyze
@josechvaicer73282 жыл бұрын
Hello Mr. Robertson, I have a question following your very clear and helpful videos. Once I calculated CL, UCL and LCL the data belong to the "past". Now a new lot was produced. How do I incorporate the new data in the CL's? After how many new lots should I update the limits? Do I disregard the first lots from the calculations? What is the periodic update recommended ?
@CQEAcademy2 жыл бұрын
Hey Jose, great question, in fact I would argue that this is one of the trickiest parts of SPC, because there isn't a specific answer to that question. It really depends a lot on your process. Technically, if your process is "stable" and "in control" you shouldn't expect much change in your range chart, (or the width of your X-bar chart). This is especially true if you setup your sub-groups correctly to be "rationale" in that they only capture common cause variation. But what can change is the centerline of your process. You might have long term sources of common cause variation that might change the center of your process, and force a recalculation of the limits. Like I mentioned though, there aren't any hard and fast rules around this and it depends on your process.
@josechvaicer73282 жыл бұрын
@@CQEAcademy Thank you Andy. It seems everything actually (past, present and future) depends on the process performance. Considering that special cause cases the updade should be as soon as detection occurs, I am still looking for a reasonable or recommended "moving update number" of samples on common cause processes. Is there any?
@CQEAcademy2 жыл бұрын
@@josechvaicer7328 Not that I'm familiar with Jose. What I would recommend is an experiment. Choose a set number of sub-groups and re-calculate the control limits after that set number. If you find that the control limits don't change often, increase that number. If they change more often (and you still feel confident that the process is only experiencing common cause variation) then decrease that number.
@josechvaicer73282 жыл бұрын
@@CQEAcademy Trial and error.....should give the answer. Thank you for the practical hint.
@muhdhazwan1109 Жыл бұрын
Hi there, thank you for the video. By the way can you let me know how do i decide what is the best sample size for an attribute chart?. Which tools do i use to "calculate" or estimate the best suitable sample size for attribute chart.
@chill69849 ай бұрын
Hi, can i know what is the t chart in SPC? Is there any others name for it and what is it? Look forward for ur reply, thank you.
@arunachalamsenthilkumar77189 ай бұрын
I'm just wondering how can u-chart take variable sample size?
@satrinahassan20762 жыл бұрын
How can you help me create a control chart for Pressure injury
@MR-Tito579 Жыл бұрын
Hi .. can we implement on process of a providing services not a physicals product and what would be the difference of measuring a service process rather than a production process ? ... Thank you in advance
@markenriquez69372 жыл бұрын
What if your lot sizes change but your samples stay the same? Should that be treated the same as your sample sizes varying?
@markenriquez69372 жыл бұрын
Also is there an attribute chart that captures when I have more than pass/fail? I have a heat pipe soldering requirement that recieves X-ray inspection and the customers spec has an target / acceptable / fail criteria and it seems like it would valuable to capture when it is in acceptable condition in addition to target and fail.
@CQEAcademy2 жыл бұрын
Hey Mark, yes I would use the p chart or the u chart in this scenario
@herrawillianymonalissa58472 жыл бұрын
Thank you for your explanation in the video. Can i used some prinsip if i have the data of finished good, (non defect product)? Or maybe is there any other way to check control limit of those data? Thank you
@davidramirezp24333 жыл бұрын
Hey, I was just wondering why 3 in every UCL and LCL formula? Is there an specific reason for it to be 3 times the square root of the parameters? Can the 3 be changed in certain situations? Thx in advance!
@CQEAcademy3 жыл бұрын
Hey David, the 3 ensures that we capture the +/- 3 sigma. That term to the right of the 3 reflects the standard deviation associated with those control charts, so when we multiple by 3, we get +/- 3-sigma, which is the expected, normal variation. It's not very standard to change the 3. If you were to reduce it, you'd increase the "alpha risk" associated with your control charts, meaning that you'd be getting "out of control points" when the process was really just experiencing normal cause variation.
@davongrant13682 жыл бұрын
is that a colorado state university rams flag in the background??
@CQEAcademy2 жыл бұрын
Good eye Davon!!! I am a proud CSU Ram!!!
@davongrant13682 жыл бұрын
@@CQEAcademy So cool!!! I played basketball at Adams State down in Alamosa, so it stood out to me. A couple friends of mine are CSU alum from 2014/2015 graduating classes. Thank you for all your knowledge and insights. I feel even more of a personal connection! All the best! Cheers! 🥂
@CQEAcademy2 жыл бұрын
@@davongrant1368 Same to you Davon!!! And I appreciate the comment and the great feedback!!!
@dhandamv3 жыл бұрын
Can Lower control limit could be negative in NP chart ??
@CQEAcademy3 жыл бұрын
Hey Dhandapani, great question! Okay, so think about what the Y-Axis is for the NP chart. We're counting the number of defective units, and it is impossible to have a negative number of defects. If the calculation for the LCL for an NP chart is a negative number, you can simply drop the LCL or set it at zero. Depending on how close the LCL is to zero, having zero defective units might be cause for alarm (under-inspection) or it might just be simple, random variation. -Andy
@albertlee83422 жыл бұрын
Can I get the templates of 7 old QC charts with formulas from internet that I may input data to seeing the results.
@CQEAcademy2 жыл бұрын
Hey Albert! I would personally recommend trying to build alot of the QC tools in excel yourself - it's a great way to confirm that you understand how to perform all of the calculations, but also test your excel skills in terms of building charts. And for some of the QC tools (flow charts, C&E diagram) I would first recommend building these tools with post-it notes, and then converting them into a digital product using something like powerpoint.
@albertlee83422 жыл бұрын
Yes, thank you so much for suggestions of self learning again. I have threw all text books as small living place, the books which I bought in2006 for QM MSc in Uni of HK, some formulas I have really forgotten. Now I want to relearning for using in my job
@zguitarmaster3 жыл бұрын
Regarding the defect vs defectives… I thought that the unit wouldn’t be considered defective unless the defects prevent the product from functioning. Meaning just because a unit has a defect on it, it wouldn’t be considered defective.
@andyrobertson5663 жыл бұрын
Hey There! Okay so that definition I provided is the generic definition of a defective item. It's possible that your organization might have a slightly different definition that's risk based and considers the impact to functionality. If your organization has a rule that allows you exclude a failure mode from being "defective" based on its impact to the customer, you could simply exclude that from consideration while executing your control chart. The real key part of that definition is whether or not the entire unit is counted as good or bad - which allows you to use the Binomial distribution and the P-chart or the NP Chart.
@zguitarmaster3 жыл бұрын
@@andyrobertson566 thanks for the quick response!
@jannatulabunayeem63492 жыл бұрын
That's great
@CQEAcademy2 жыл бұрын
You're welcome Jannatul!!!
@faisalyousef27642 жыл бұрын
Hello , I really enjoy your videos, say you have 80 observations, each observe a number of people waiting in a line, which Control Chart would you use for it? if I try np I won't be able to get the P-bar
@greenbeltacademy2 жыл бұрын
Hey Faisal, will you have the same 80 people in line every day? If not, and the daily sample size changes, you'll want to use either the U chart or the P chart.
@ayessaaquino37813 жыл бұрын
Hi! Where can I get a powerpoint presentation just like this one? Thank you!
@CQEAcademy3 жыл бұрын
Hey Ayessa!!! I made this presentation myself, it's sort of my secret sauce :)
@ZezaoCH2 жыл бұрын
Excellent video! Now, since SPC charts always look to the past (what HAS happen) what would be the guidelines for establishing the "looking ahead" period or days to renew the graphs?
@brentlackey83164 ай бұрын
Sum of subgroup quantities with an s!
@nishadhr40242 жыл бұрын
Butt🥺 why when I calculate I'm getting math error 😢
@CQEAcademy2 жыл бұрын
Hmmm that's odd, at which point are you getting an error???
@raghudotnet Жыл бұрын
@@CQEAcademyboth P and u chart the LCL and UCL am getting different values, what’s the value to be considered as u-bar or P-bar, for example in the ucl of u bar example, if I recheck u-bar is 750.69 in that equation if I reverse calculate
@CQEAcademy Жыл бұрын
Hey @@raghudotnet U-bar should be 7.5% and is calculated as 117 defects, divided by 1,560 units inspected.