Craig Wright Full Testimony: Hodlonaut v Craig Wright - Day 3

This is the full video from Craig Wright's testimony on day 3 of the Hodlonaut v Craig Wright trial on September 14th, 2022.
#bitcoin #hodlonaut #craigwright #hodlonautvcraigwright #bitcoinmagazine #news #bitcoinnews #defamationtrial
0:00 - 2:09 - Craig Wright Sworn In
2:09 - 18:13 - Reviewing Tweets on Craig Wright
18:13 - 19:58 - Bitcoin Privacy and Scaling According to Craig Wright
19:58 - 25:35 - Craig Wright debate with Peter Todd
25:35 - 27:24 - Craig Wright debate with Jameson Lopp and Charlie Lee
27:24 - 40:34 - Craig Wright Background
40:34 - 41:29 - Blacknet
41:29 - 43:21 - BDO
43:21 - 45:38 - CSW Coding
45:38 - 49:14 - Development of Bitcoin
49:14 - 49:47 - Encryption and Mining FUD
49:47 - 1:14:37 - Bitcoin Whitepaper
1:14:37 - 1:20:03 - Bitcoin Mining
1:20:03 - 1:23:24 - Relationship with Gavin Andresen
1:23:24 - 1:30:39 - 2011 - 2015 Craig Wright Work
1:30:39 - 1:37:28 - Gizmo and Wired Magazine Claims
1:37:28 - 1:55:10 - Reviewing points in Jameson Lopp Article
1:55:10 - 2:00:26 - Craig Altering Posts
2:00:26 - 2:01:10 - Dave Kleinman 50/50 Partnership
2:01:10 - 2:09:27 - KPMG Report
2:09:27 - 2:10:16 - Inaudible Norwegian Talk
2:10:16 - 2:11:09 - Conclude KPGM / Manipulation of Documents
2:11:09 - 2:12:39 - John Matones Signing Session
2:12:39 - 2:19:04 - Gavin Andresen Signing Session
2:19:04 - 2:21:46 - Gavin Andresen Criticism
2:21:46 - 2:22:38 - O'Hagan Cryptographic Proof
2:22:38 - 2:24:30 - Patents
2:24:30 - 2:25:41 - Craig Wright's Approach
2:25:41 - 3:48:56 - Cross Examination of Craig Wright by Hodlonaut Lawyers
3:48:56 - 3:53:29 - Question from Judge
3:53:29 - 3:54:24 - Craig Lawyer Follow-up Question
3:54:24 - 3:54:59 - Craig Wright Final Remarks

[@resreqt]

Kudos to bitcoin magazine for letting craig be unedited

[@tomdillinger4263]

@@alfredom877 Except he isn’t Satoshi, he is a grifter.

[@BBH101]

@@alfredom877 Craig is setting up to steal coins, and you are AOK with that? Wow.

[@sharpvidtube]

I don't think anyone has wanted to edit Craig, as his stories contradict themselves, often change, and seem the opposite of what Satoshi was working on. Satoshi worked with several crpherpunks, that he obviously admired. For years we were told he was going to sell all BTC, now he doesn't care. If Bitcoin was totally controlled by the law, it would be exactly the same as the banking system, that doesn't solve anything, and I have no idea why proof of work would be necessary? BSV is like Tron, but would cost more to run, if it ever became popular. It's also completely different to what Craig talked about in the BCH days, when it seemed to be about making Bitcoin untraceable.

[@bitcoinheiro]

@@sharpvidtube Don't try to reason with trolls, they will never learn and will consume your precious time

[@thepapervigilante2208]

Vitalik calls he a scammer, why he doesn’t sue him ?

[@NycToTx]

Thanks for posting the unedited. Well done!

[@henridetroost]

Expect it is @3:36:30

[@boostbeast412]

10 years boys In 10 years 2 halvings would happen miners would be getting 1.5 BTC as rewards and price hasn't adjusted accordingly, miners will be supporting 21M inflation Then we will see wether the miners with 51% or more will be able to do what they want regardless whether the non mining nodes accept or not See you in 10 years Cheers

[@eargasmhq2597]

@@boostbeast412 why do you think price wouldn’t adjust? It is adjusting, increasing and will always will

[@boostbeast412]

@@eargasmhq2597 many things are changing many things that werent a factor before are shaking the ground like ordinals, blackrock etf and many others Also around 50$ isnt significant enough yet because it was 100$ then dipped to 20 then going up so lets wait n see

[@speedkiss22]

I'm so happy that I can see this real raw footage

[@timothytimtayshuncurry2717]

@WHaTsApP 𐠒 ①⑧①⑥③⑦⑥⓪⑤⑦① - How's your trading going?😂 (BSVers! I should warn you that this is at least as obvious a scam as Creg)

[@tom7784]

@@timothytimtayshuncurry2717 his name is spelt Craig, not Creg.. typical BTC’er

[@sharpvidtube]

@@tom7784 That's ironic, when you see how often Craig and Calvin spell things wrong. I think Creg probably started with Calvin, as did gigamegs.

[@boostbeast412]

10 years boys In 10 years 2 halvings would happen miners would be getting 1.5 BTC as rewards and price hasn't adjusted accordingly, miners will be supporting 21M inflation Then we will see wether the miners with 51% or more will be able to do what they want regardless whether the non mining nodes accept or not See you in 10 years Cheers

[@SAL-fs1mr]

@@tom7784 Creg lost, and you bsv cult members deserve this outcome.

[@vikramrihal]

Very interesting

[@KeyAtoms]

Recommend watching at 2x Thanks for the unedited coverage

[@henridetroost]

Except it is @3:36:30

[@akogepayo]

Very surprised that Bitcoin Magazine has covered an unedited video of Craig. I am expecting coingeek has this coverage too.

[@lahaulauala1201]

Great, could you also upload the full unedited testimonies of witnesses from both sides

[@merrimac290]

I second this.

[@panzadura]

1:43:00 - CSW against Lopp's 'How Many Wrongs Make a Wright?'

[@JonathanCr0ss]

These answers are nonsense. He sounds so confident, but if one really understands Bitcoin, these answers mane no sense, they are just deflection.

[@boostbeast412]

@@JonathanCr0ss 10 years boys In 10 years 2 halvings would happen miners would be getting 1.5 BTC as rewards and price hasn't adjusted accordingly, miners will be supporting 21M inflation Then we will see wether the miners with 51% or more will be able to do what they want regardless whether the non mining nodes accept or not See you in 10 years Cheers

[@markdelej]

Anyone know what craig means at 3:02:34 when he says btc can be seized and is basically saying it isnt decentralised?

[@keypawn3024]

He means that a court order can compel miners to accept a "correction" transaction. So if the government wants to seize stolen coins, they can order the miners to process a entry that assigns the stolen coins to an address that's controlled by the victim.

[@markdelej]

@@keypawn3024 well that wouldnt ever happen and isnt possible in reality. 3 or 4 large minors own just over 50% of hash power but the hash power they have is from pooled minors dispersed all around the world. As soon as there is even a mention of government forcing a transaction to be changed on the bitcoin network everyone will disconnect within seconds or minutes from these mining pools and their hash rate will plummet and they’ll have no power to change any transactions then. You would need more than 50% of the network to change a transaction and also it isnt simple to edit a transaction.

[@JonathanCr0ss]

@@keypawn3024 You mean INVALID transactions? Those would be rejected by the network obviously.

[@ryanshaw4250]

@@JonathanCr0ss Actually it depends, If the vast majority of miners are in the US/EU/Japan/S Korea, and other US allied countries, it may actually be feasible. Bitmain launched ASIC years ago and huge chunks of mining were in China but that has changed over the last 3 years and very few miners are in china now. At the same time, the US has a massive increase in mining and yes, these miners could possibly be forced to do things by court order. As mining gets out of the hands of small garage operators and goes into the hands of basically data center level operators, the feasibility of this increases dramatically.

[@PrepperKiwi]

Triple entry accounting. Bitcoin is basically a fancy 8 column cash.

[@spiritmori3225]

Just after Wright says "yes, I created the algorithm that calculates them" @2:38:56, you can hear someone stifle a laugh.

[@TimJSwan]

Because someone can't seem to comprehend the concept of making an algorithm which generates multiple parts of a base private key.

[@spiritmori3225]

@@CelonixCleaningServicesLLC Don't waste your time pal. The chances of Craig Wright being Satoshi is exactly 0%. Not only is there a complete absence of any hard evidence that he invented bitcoin, but he's also been caught lying at least twenty times: (1) The Sartre proof was faked, which he's since admitted. (2) The Tulip trust, which supposedly proved he and Dave Kleiman worked on bitcoin together, was actually created in 2014, a year after Klieman died. (3) If you read the emails between him and Ira Kleiman, he changes his story about how much Kleiman was involved. First it was Craig, David, and some other guy. Then it was Craig and David. And finally, during the Kleiman v Wright lawsuit (2018), Wright said Kleiman had nothing to do with it. (4) He makes baffling technical claims - like that bitcoin is Turing complete (it isn't). He also gets caught out disagreeing with Satoshi's own quotes when people send them to him on Twitter. (5) Three judges in three separate countries have caught him lying in court. Their statements about his character are scathing. I should also point out he could move some early coins or sign a message publicly and prove his claims in about 8 seconds. When asked why he won't, he comes up with the weirdest excuses like "I don't want to make it easy for them," or something. Which indicates he has something of a messiah complex. Anyway, the above is what I could remember off the top of my head, I stopped following what he's up to after he was ordered to pay $150m to Kleiman's family and tried to spin that as a victory. There's loads more out there. Again, don't waste your time on that clown. The better candidates are Szabo, Finney, and Dai.

[@freaksh0]

@@CelonixCleaningServicesLLC if not, you will end up in a fail compilation

[@Scripterrific]

3:36:21 cut (edit). I thought this was unedited?

[@Scripterrific]

You got to wonder what he said that they cut out of this part. He seemed to be very passionate about what he was saying while criticizing Google… very suspicious

[@sypher294]

Imagine being Hodlnaut and having to sit through this. This testimony was incredible.

[@mickeydrago9401]

Pretty sure they are not involved. Sticking to their Singapore and Hong Kong roots

[@SAL-fs1mr]

It paid off. "The court believes that Hodlonaut had sufficient factual grounds to claim that Wright had lied and cheated in his attempt to prove that he is Satoshi Nakamoto."

[@sypher294]

​@@SAL-fs1mr And that's a fair assessment. Specifically, Hodlnaut had sufficient grounds to make such claims, given the publicly available information *at that time*. Since that time, more information and evidence has been presented in numerous court cases. This means that other would-be libellers / defamers might be left on the hook, given the changing landscape of evidence.

[@SAL-fs1mr]

@@sypher294 lol! Why are you trying to rationalize an obvious fraud?

[@sypher294]

​@@SAL-fs1mr did you listen to his testimony? The whole thing? What about it is "obviously fraudulent"?

[@gongsikbaby]

Automatic translation is not supported for the next 10 minutes Why not from the dcg group story?

[@pattimurphy5151]

It reminds me of what they did to Tesla...the JP Morgans of this evil world.

[@adelinad3513]

True...hope this time we are more awake

[@ctcsys]

Nice to get it clear posession of key does not proof identity - most not bevore registration...

[@lutronc4412]

Day 4? why not sharing?

[@KeithKnightScotland]

The way Craig sums up the session with the Judge at the end highlights the problem he faces. In his eyes there is only one way to prove it and that is the way he says and it makes total sense that can be the only way to prove Craig as a person is Satoshi. Using keys like he says proves nothing and he is correct. You need people to speak up and say what they say and people will decide for themselves. The next stage is then using Keys...

[@akogepayo]

One logical fallacy I see from people who criticized Craig is that an assumption was always made that Satoshi Nakamoto is not a flawed person and must be an upright individual. How could they saw this behavior of Satoshi Nakamoto as certain without knowing him personally is beyond reason to explain, we are not gods. It's like we know exactly how the "Messiah" will do, and what family he was about to be born, and what type of career he may have, and if the Messiah comes along with all your expectations gone out of the window, you will reject him right away, regardless of proof or reasons. (Disclaimer: I am not saying Craig is SN, just to correct the logical fallacy from anti Craig camp).

[@tomdillinger4263]

The “anti-Craig camp”is just basic common sense. What the fuck are you even reading to assume people think Satoshi was the perfect human being? That sentiment is only expressed by the moronic BSV brigade.

[@akogepayo]

​@@tomdillinger4263 I do not know what you are talking about. Maybe you can just read and stop cursing. The moron here is the person who assumes things and expects things that do not exist, and expects a Satoshi Nakamoto personality that doesn't exist. You can't just derive the personality of a human being based on forum posts and emails.

[@tomdillinger4263]

@@akogepayo If there is a small subset of people who believe Craig Wright is Satoshi and see him as all knowing then continue to post their delusions online you can easily derive the fact they’re not very smart people, seeing as it is so easily proven that he is a fraud. You have shown your lack of critical thinking ability by even referring to people who know Craig isn’t Satoshi as the “anti-Craig camp” as if it is even up for debate at this point. You either have the ability to deduct that Craig isn’t Satoshi with common sense or you don’t. Same goes for what is the longest chain and therefore Bitcoin. (Spoiler, Bitcoin is Bitcoin. BSV is a failed minority fork in case you were unaware)

[@TimJSwan]

@@tomdillinger4263 How is it "easily proven" that he is a fraud?

[@spiritmori3225]

Your argument that Wright's detractors have fallen into a logical fallacy is itself a straw man. Whoever said that Satoshi had messianic qualities? Anyone I've ever spoken with about him thinks is a supernerd computer science/ math PhD with a libertarian streak.

[@555pontifex]

@2:16:03 "Internet Exploder 11" LOL. Old Timer computer geeks have a list of funny names for Microsoft products. "Microsoft Outlook" = "Microsoft Outhouse" and so on...

[@bitister8004]

After watching the full testimony, now I'm nearly 100% sure Craig Wright is Satoshi. What this guy is talking about makes absolute sense in every detail.

[@bubble9044]

NO. I am 100% sure CW is not Satoshi.

[@bitister8004]

@@bubble9044 Can you tell me how and why?

[@kingsleychristophers1218]

Why Craig never work on bitcoin and came up publicly to work on BSV. Craig is not satoshi but faketoshi. If he claims to be satoshi he should sign in the first block mined in the public. For my own opinion Craig is not satoshi

[@bitister8004]

@@kingsleychristophers1218 Craig has always been working on Bitcoin, and before everyone else. He has incredible amount of knowledge about Bitcoin and blockchain, he developed many inventions on top of Bitcoin, his company has massive amount of IP about Bitcoin. BTC core developers refused to scale Bitcoin and changed its protocol many times. Miners obeyed them. Bitcoin continued as Bitcoin Cash. Then, people in BCH wanted to change the protocol and they continue on a different chain with different rules. Bitcoin brand is stolen with a dirty propaganda on social media by small blockers. What you know as Bitcoin (BTC) right now is not Bitcoin, its rule set is different than the Bitcoin invented in 2008. It's something else but more popular for now. He explains why he is not going to sign BEFORE he proves his identity as Satoshi Nakamoto in courts. He has very good arguments. Watch the video..

[@abundance5767]

@@bitister8004 Hahaha. What kinda of mental gymnastics did you have to go through to reach that conclusion? He's going to spend years, millions of dollars, and is going to attempt to ruin people legally and financially rather than spending $0.00 and 30 seconds to sign a transaction to accomplish the exact same thing? The guy embodies none of the qualities displayed by Satoshi in his early written works, and has already demonstrated on multiple occasions that he is capable of lying under oath. I don't see a reason to believe a word he says.

[@harman76239]

Craig Steven Wright is the most interesting man in the 21st century, there is most definitely a good reason why all the big money is attacking him.

[@timothytimtayshuncurry2717]

You spelled "backing" him. ...but, beyond billionaire Calvin's money (whom he gained through grifting the fake 1Feex... wallet and other forgeries), the entirety of everyone else already knows he's a fraud - as you'll see AGAIN once this Hodlnaut trial concludes later this week. Sorry for your loss.

[@chrismale9976]

He's insane

[@BruceThomson]

Comparable with Elon Musk, I would say. They are today's equivalents of Leonardo da Vinci and Edison and Tesla, etc. I feel privileged to witness this breathtakking history happening before my eyes o a 27" high-resolution screen, while nearly all of humanity does crossword puzzles or plays basketball. =)

[@harman76239]

@@BruceThomson agreed!

[@mickeydrago9401]

@@chrismale9976 Insane enough to create a peer-to-peer cash system that will disintermediate nation state global hegemony, empires, rothschilds, and all the incumbent conceit and arrogance of people believing they are wise enough and deserving enough to control others by fiat and ego-driven opinions. Trustless, borderless, decentralized, and uncensored in an era of censorship run amok... Sadly Dr Craig Wright is getting the treatment Tesla got from ahole Edison (which in this Satoshi case is largely the bully crowd of those thinking they are wiser than Craig by calling him insane and a liar). It's a witch hunt mentality and conceit by those trying to boost their own ego thinking they are wiser and smarter than Craig.

[@jolantasokalska4201]

Gavin looks like Steve Jobs... Coincidentally of course😂😊

[@user-rj2ow5vb3d]

He is out here boys and girls. the man just explained how corporations and governments are just trying to manipulate another thing that a smart person invented. If this guy didnt invent it i dont know who else can. Not the ETH guy that has no idea to be honest even why Digital cash was created.

[@brutusmaximus5380]

Here's what most of your normies and maybe Craig Wright don't understand about the legal definition of "Person". In the legal world, a person can be more than one individual. With that in mind, the courts may treat the name SATOSHI NAKAMOTO as an express trust where Craig Wright is the Grantor. While, the Developers are the trustees. In an express trust, there isn't a written contract. The contract is implied. The trustees have legal ownership of the name while Craig Wright may claim Grantor/Beneficiary privileges in a court of competent jurisdiction. What Craig Wright needs to do is find his keys to prove he is the trust beneficiary of the Satoshi Nakamoto trust entity. There's no need for the courts to get in the way of enforcing a trust contract since the system is trustless. Besides, governments have no authority to interfere with a private contract between 2 parties. Courts can be used to enforce copyright infringement and patent law. Craig Wright has the patents.

[@billyboy385]

man i wish i could get my keys i would correct you satoshi should get his keys but i wouldnt doubt they'd been sold to a man like craig wright.edit i cant say anything i dont know him.

[@REZZA2020]

Coo Coo ! 🚑🚑🚑🚑

[@toneengel]

3:03....YES.

[@ketonesnotglucose4978]

That was a weird episode 🤣

[@donkeykong3952]

Show us on the doll where the tweet hurt you.

[@RMGWOO]

Right.

[@altayrstudio]

If he is not Satoshi .. what is all the fuss about, I mean why give attention? Now, if he is Satoshi I don't think it's in his best interest to sign, why would you potentially create a storm dump when you can sell at a steady pace.

[@grxygxds]

lmao he doesnt own shit and he aint satoshi, he is a pathological liar.

[@adelinad3513]

Copa trial ...see the stakes

[@jensbucher9770]

2:25:30 cross-examination

[@gm42069]

Thank you

[@cuongvitruong]

I prefer to be known as a civilian. I don't desire to become world famous. I rather live myself as a legal immigrant living a good life in the USA. I'm not an outgoing type. Please stop dragging me in front of the scene. I just want to make money and live a good life so I can enjoy my life in the USA.

[@DollarDown]

CRAIG IS SATOSHI

[@RothkoC]

Richard Heart exposed this clown who's own Mother accuses him of being a compulsive liar.

[@go5582]

Where is thw extract 57?

[@lorddrake8566]

Thank you BTC Magazine 🎉

[@mattsutherland546]

Body Language - 'Leaning backward usually signals feelings of dislike or negativity. It's a hardwired response from the limbic brain; we subconsciously try to distance ourselves from anything unpleasant or dangerous.'

[@adelinad3513]

Like defaming treats that speak badly about your wife you mean?

[@mattsutherland546]

@@adelinad3513 I tried, but that sentence just doesn't make sense.

[@zugzug9969]

I love the energy of CSW When asked a simple question, he explains the whole technical process ...

[@franciscoramos7391]

Am I the only one who thinks that all that he's said here proves nothing more than an elaborate story without anything that can back it up? Every single evidence presented could've perfectly been faked

[@EmanueleNusca]

Should be educative to see the plaintiff stand AS WELL… I hope you’ll post soon, just for people to compare by themselves. Will you do it?

[@brianoshaughnessy9527]

I doubt it

[@EmanueleNusca]

@@brianoshaughnessy9527 me too. And whoever is following without bias knows why. Truth is unstoppable anyway, no matter how slow it is! 💙💎

[@Gutek.1]

🙂👍

[@green3488]

If following this stuff was a university exam, I'd award you 110 points out of 100. A++

[@TheShredfest89]

3:51:00

[@thotaramesh1234]

“…Robert defense….. 🤣🤣🤣

[@flagermusen]

Dread Pirate Roberts defense. It was the defense Ross Ulbricht made in the Silk Road case against him.

[@musamoney6671]

Bsv is the original bitcoin and grown man will weep when the truth comes to light 💡

[@spiritusinfinitus]

He says that he wants to make it easier for courts to prove ownership of private keys. Meanwhile whilst himself in court he intentionally diverts and deflects and makes it impossible for the court to determine ownership of private keys. The guy is completely delusional.

[@dangermauz754]

Exactly

[@BNJMIN]

You’re delusional.

[@flagermusen]

No, he is actually making the important point that mere possession of keys is not the same as ownership. Maybe you missed the whole "dread pirate roberts defense" bit from silk road.

[@spiritusinfinitus]

@@flagermusen No he's not. He's deflecting and distracting the same that he always does. He's not Satoshi. He'll never provide any credible evidence to suggest that he is. Hearsay from people vouching for him is not credible evidence. If he owned the keys he'd move funds or sign a message. He's never going to do that because he can't.

[@flagermusen]

​@@spiritusinfinitus lmao you are so wrong, and you are simply unintelligent. Witness testimony is the definition of direct evidence. Look it up.

[@ananias-]

Who really cares who Satoshi is at this point in time

[@dangermauz754]

No front view of this Jussie Smalls! Just want us to take his word for it! 🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@yardietov]

Who is John Gault amongst a generation of vipers. A man of principle but not necessarily of consistent character versus a minion of the brood, a man of low character his principles determined by his cult.

[@acetheo6864]

I’m still trying to figure out some things. Please help me here. 1. What is really going on? What is the story that’s being missed? Things are so unclear and don’t make logical sense. 2. Why would the author of Bitcoin publish Anonymously and then change his mind?

[@dontump2286]

without watching, what is this trial even about? I thought he was supposed to prove or disprove that he is in fact Satoshi? or is that just a talking point for btc news headlines when the price starts to move?

[@MrMentalpuppy]

Trust me, the only part worth listening to is the cross exam. Otherwise, he does speak well and he seems legit. Interesting guy, knowledgeable tbh.

[@danamin8756]

3:36:00

[@mrpaddingtonn]

an endless cup of tea/coffee…

[@liminal6823]

Purest cringe.

[@Neosin1]

What about IP logs from the forums back in 2008/2009? If the message board had those logs, would at least prove where satoshi was located... Pretty sure vpns were not a thing back then

[@willspeakman2461]

They were a thing then and they were free

[@sehuno]

csw is satoshi

[@thepapervigilante2208]

He usually excuses himself in something that then they accept as a valid acussation against him with no prove , it’s impossible convincing anyone that way

[@akogepayo]

Craig was using courts to prove his identity. Bringing in live witnesses that corroborates his claims is impossible to fake. You can have these witnesses check their backgrounds to ascertain the possibility that all of them are lying. To date, the only weak point of Craig is that he refuses to sign using one of Satoshi's keys. That's a default win to critics, and a hard pill to swallow by his supporters. However, his refusal to sign is consistent with his method that using courts to prove one's identity and also is consistent with his claims that "keys" are not absolute proof of someone's identity. As he said: The mere possession of a key will never in itself be evidence of identity or ownership. Secondly: One critic has stated that if Craig will use an actual Satoshi key in a public signing, it will be interpreted as Craig stole one of Satoshis's keys. So, there is already a verdict against him and the narrative shows you that.

[@BobbyHo2022]

No it wouldn't. It would mean he at the very least knew Satoshi and therefore most like is Satoshi.

[@loganschmick792]

This case should of waited for COPA VS WRIGHT before sitting , silly decision that they have accepted now with the appeal.

[@TheTruthAboutBitcoin]

after listening to this i can clearly see the truth.. it makes complete sense why people don’t want this technology out in the world. i could see bitcoin being the black swan that allows people to trade outside of the central system trying to be created.

[@jimgauth]

Satoshi clearly states he does not want to change the laws of trading, he simply wants them recorded publicly.

[@tom7784]

@@jimgauth correct

[@phaniyiangouapatsidis8928]

spot on my friend, maybe even covid came about because of bitcoinSV threat

[@TheTruthAboutBitcoin]

@@phaniyiangouapatsidis8928 covid came out because of a much bigger game at play but bsv is definitely a major threat to the system.

[@ArthurvanPelt]

Now go check out the 100s of forgeries that Craig Wright created starting 2014 (that's when his Satoshi cosplay started, yes) to support his false Satoshi claims. Then go check out the numerous times that this cosplayer completely contradicted Satoshi Nakamoto his visions and advices (for example about pumping arbitrary data in the blockchain, about being decentralized, about offchain scaling, about full nodes, about irreversible transactions, about Nakamoto consensus etc etc) and you will realize how hilariously wrong you are. Craig Wright is simply a con man who didn't even know about Bitcoin before August 2011. Fact.

[@kallionlohikaarmeklinikka7779]

It’s fair to not edit this, even though you might not agree🙏🏽

[@bitcoin487]

He is satoshi I use to think he wasn't Thanks for this video

[@DanHomeAtLast]

Yeh it's looking pretty clear now. Amazing really and to know its this guy feels ok in a way, he's the type of person you want to be Satoshi.

[@OriginalBanksy2002]

I told the irs you were behind the crypto locking. 😂 You see how zhao got charged?

[@Luw7]

Anyone got a timestamp when Creg says "If I sign with keys, everything would be over!" by any chance?

[@bigtymer4862]

Would also love to know this

[@KevinHealy]

It was right at the end. 3:51:31

[@Luw7]

@@KevinHealy Thanks yeah I actually lucked upon it it's indeed almost right at the end.

[@codykingham4089]

He really revealed his true motivation there...

[@BNJMIN]

Craig description of what Reddit is, GOLD. I literally cracked up laughing

[@realtonaldrum]

At 1:58:10 the judge asked about reddit.

[@mickeydrago9401]

Reddit is annoyingly childish and attracts young fools. And yet it has some features most social media doesn't have... Along with the usual left-wing censorship, I would know... Depending on the channel Reddit certainly can attract higher intelligence... I guess I should call it subreddit instead of channel After a while it's actually hard for me to not hate the artwork and diminishment of human value given the art direction.

[@Scalia-ig6qz]

He's rather die then submit to google so.....yup!

[@REZZA2020]

Trying to confuse using jargon. Arrest the Fraud !

[@flagermusen]

Fascist much?

[@REZZA2020]

@@flagermusen Con artists belong behind Bars mate!! . What the fuck does a political idelogy have to do that ?

[@freaksh0]

Faketoshi demonstrating “If you can’t convince them, confuse them”

[@grxygxds]

lmfao

[@realtonaldrum]

Craig tells the judge he attempted suicide 3:33:55

[@grxygxds]

lmfao he says "no i didnt have a laptop after i committed suicide" LOLOLOL

[@realtonaldrum]

@@grxygxds in the hospital.

[@grxygxds]

@@realtonaldrum he is a pathological liar and a idiot. Glad he lost this case.

[@mikel87]

Why would he attempt suicide I thought he was doing well

[@vladradek]

Around the 49 min mark. Either what I believe I know about Bitcoin is wrong, or Craig Wright doesn't understand how Bitcoin works. Is he conflating Bitcoin miners with Bitcoin nodes? Either way, somebody please put me out of my misery.

[@abrahamrodriguez5424]

I heard that too

[@Satoshis8]

WHAT ABOUT more last questions WHY YOU CAME BACK AFTER ALL THIS YEARS, then to the Polygraph test 🤔so we end this SHOW

[@Quartercrawler]

😅🤣😂🧐💩...NO KEYS NO CHEESE!

[@TedKeyboardify]

Are we ignoring the fact that Craig appears to have created an actual bottomless cup of coffee!?

[@flagermusen]

I think it's just a stress response to drink from the cup. Not that relaxing being on a witness stand.

[@timothytimtayshuncurry2717]

@@flagermusen Probably trying to create "cOfFeE sTaInS" to prove how old his forged documents are

[@timothytimtayshuncurry2717]

...or he owns the patent on "bottomless coffee" and has the "OrIgInAl nOtEs, WiTh cOfFeE sTaInS aNd rUsTy StApLes" to prove it" ....along with 100 frenz

[@PleaseShutUpNowDude]

Lawr enforcement

[@ramg1015]

😁👍

[@Hugo-ew2ko]

Ah yes, Satoshi does everything humanly possible to conceal his identity.... And then starts suing people who call him a fraud. Classic Satoshi.

[@giorgioguidazzi2084]

To sum up hahahah

[@LAINE-mm3le]

Around 1:15:00 mark, look guys… I invented this electronic cash system anonymsly under pseudonym, because I was afraid of goverment authorities and their actions! So this is why in 2009 I inform the SAME authorities that I invented it and I need tax deductions… brilliant :D

[@JordanPriede]

@@LAINE-mm3le that is a fair point.

[@Carbonkraft]

He is being sued here, not suing.

[@morningworm]

Concealed his identity until he was outed.. why not own it after that.. cats out the bag

[@beltcro]

Just because you led the tango Craig doesnt mean your the only one that wants to dance. Theyre never going to use CW to market this whole thing when they have Beyonce. You dont want to be explaining BTC to the pigeons like our other friend ended up explaining electricity. As they say in Oz you never give away the keys 🔑 to the farm Sound like this whole exercise is to find out what influence CW has over BTC and how they can get hold of the keys rather than wether he is Satoshi

[@bloodywashere]

At 3:36:26 there is an edit. Why? What did they cut out??

[@BNJMIN]

Lol, Craig schooling the lawyer on trusts and blind trusts

[@timothytimtayshuncurry2717]

Link to the video YOU'RE watching?!?!? 🤣🤣🤣

[@SAL-fs1mr]

Lol! The judge schooled Craig! "Hodlonaut had sufficient factual grounds to claim that Wright had lied and cheated in his attempt to prove that he is Satoshi Nakamoto."

[@jolantasokalska4201]

Yes too. Embarrasing...

[@stiltcity]

@2:39:00 every time he drinks from that empty cup he is lying!

[@a_lucientes]

If he really wished to prove he was SM it would be very easy (just say he will do a transaction, moving some crypto from his untouched BTC wallet. And then when that happens that should prove his access to it. This guy just comes across as such an unhinged phony, that, not to judge a book by its cover, but lacking any actually compelling evidence, it's difficult to come to any other conclusion.

[@go5582]

Dr. Wright did a lot of scribbles. 😂

[@mudewitz]

Craig W. is a fraud. Furthermore he is not the inventor of the Satoshi. He may have worked for the Government and gotten involved with Bitcoin based on his background.

[@johnyj7908]

Which hospital on 2nd of May? There must be a record on that

[@grxygxds]

"i was in a coma, i didnt have a laptop after i committed suicide" literal quote

[@Mark-fh5lp]

Thank you Satoshi

[@BNJMIN]

It’s really emotional to see Craig trying to get the judge to understand that the law has the power over the blockchain. It’s like they don’t want to understand for the sake of the case.

[@kgmindustries8121]

That is likely a hint that Craig isn't Satoshi. The real Satoshi would not want any one group to have power over it, that's what the miners job is so to speak.

[@jp1234554321]

No. Read the whitepaper. Miners dont make rules. Rules are set in stone. Miners enforce rules.

[@arbo3495]

​@@jp1234554321still Satoshi was for anonymity. He didn't want bitcoin to be traceable like Craig says here

[@sgill4833]

@@kgmindustries8121 Correct. Real Satoshi is serving time in prison.

[@Craigisright-bg4fk]

Who is that, haven’t heard that before

[@cheeseheadwizard]

Its satoshi!

[@ArthurvanPelt]

Now go check out the 100s of forgeries that Craig Wright created starting 2014 (that's when his Satoshi cosplay started, yes) to support his false Satoshi claims. Then go check out the numerous times that this cosplayer completely contradicted Satoshi Nakamoto his visions and advices (for example about pumping arbitrary data in the blockchain, about being decentralized, about offchain scaling, about full nodes, about irreversible transactions, about Nakamoto consensus etc etc) and you will realize how hilariously wrong you are. Craig Wright is simply a con man who didn't even know about Bitcoin before August 2011. Fact.

[@oli2805]

Lol. Apparently Satoshi cares more about legal backflips than mathematics

[@jolantasokalska4201]

O my God Jessica who are you? Where did you study laws Didyou study , Ethics at all?😢😢😢😮😢😮😢

[@10xnino]

The prosecutor did his homework well

[@chrismale9976]

He did, Craig is in deep shit here

[@BC-nl9ph]

he understood so little

[@BlockchainTV]

CSW is Satoshi

[@chrismale9976]

Nope

[@ArthurvanPelt]

Now go check out the 100s of forgeries that Craig Wright created starting 2014 (that's when his Satoshi cosplay started, yes) to support his false Satoshi claims. Then go check out the numerous times that this cosplayer completely contradicted Satoshi Nakamoto his visions and advices (for example about pumping arbitrary data in the blockchain, about being decentralized, about offchain scaling, about full nodes, about irreversible transactions, about Nakamoto consensus etc etc) and you will realize how hilariously wrong you are. Craig Wright is simply a con man who didn't even know about Bitcoin before August 2011. Fact.

[@dazedapparition7845]

Dr Who, Dr Evil, Dr Phil(didn't renew license), Dr Seuss, Dr Strangelove, Dr Dre, Dr Wright, Dr J. All have what in common?

[@harleylimassol211]

No keys no Satoshi.

[@BobbyHo2022]

Show us the pricate key to the genesis block! Lets see those early blocks move. U got the keys eh satoshi. Should be easy for u.

[@mikeg2491]

Gonna laugh if he moves them last day of the copa trial

[@james2295]

Thanks Bitcoin magazine for recording the Satoshi testimony.

[@sharpvidtube]

Craig Wright isn't Satoshi, unless he can do what he said he would back in 2016. All we've had is excuses since then.

[@TheBossEntrepreneur]

@@sharpvidtube but it's about time we stop wasting our time on this. If he is not Satoshi then why are we giving him all that attention? Why 45 years old "grown man" are on twitter insulting someone like a little kid ?

[@sharpvidtube]

@@TheBossEntrepreneur So much of social media is two middle aged people hurling insults at each other. I have no idea why, but that's not an uncommon occurrence. Craig gives as much as he gets, it's not all one way. Personally, I'd love if people acted like adults online, but that's never going to happen. Craig is suing so many people involved with Bitcoin, I think he would be impossible to ignore. Maybe if he didn't have Calvin backing him, then he would be like all the other people claiming to be Satoshi, insignificant.

[@vincentrao3466]

@@TheBossEntrepreneur 45 year old men who lie and deceive ARE SUPPOSE TO BE Criticized and ridiculed..... Instead of asking why people are insulting this man( rightfully so) start asking why this man is lying

[@notme3945]

@@TheBossEntrepreneur because he's a fraud and should be called out?

[@billyboy385]

pseudonymous legal identity cant be traded i hope. my impression is that i lost him some money or purchased a debt and he wants satoshi in name. i'm not watching anymore, they're talking about somebodies tweets and long ago. this is historical though.

[@DanielSmith-lv5ed]

Craig, your no ideas guy. The keys arnt yours, and id be more worried about the AI sagasaki and whatnot lmao

[@BNJMIN]

He’s literally on point with almost every single answer to every single socially distorted question

[@tomdillinger4263]

Right… sure buddy. How you coping with the loss?

[@BNJMIN]

@@tomdillinger4263 fine. The appeal will be interesting. Craig is Satoshi

[@tomdillinger4263]

@@BNJMIN Coping with mental gymnastics I see. Good luck with that, kid.

[@BNJMIN]

@@tomdillinger4263 what

[@tomdillinger4263]

@@BNJMIN Don’t worry, you’ll figure it out

[@thepapervigilante2208]

Why he doesn’t sue Vitalik for calling him a scammer and a liar ?

[@narinwon1389]

he did, Vitalik ran away

[@Mxdrg]

@@narinwon1389 that's not true, Craig dropped the case. People cannot run away from being sued lmao.

[@narinwon1389]

@@Mxdrg if Vitalik didn't hide, then Craig would easily get him served right?

[@SAL-fs1mr]

@@narinwon1389 vitalik isn't hiding, he's constantly making public appearances. Craig has you fooled.

[@JoeLancaster]

@@SAL-fs1mr vitalik complied and the case didn't need to go forward.

[@lukenick2299]

Does anyone seriously believe satoshi would want, let alone believe it’s possible, to use the State to force the network to give him control of satoshis coins.

[@-ED-]

any payment system, esp one which is going to be used globally, MUST WORK WITHIN THE LAW. This is just a fact. If you think these government are traitors and things like that, that they are corrupt etc, you could be right, however not all governments are like that. If you are American, sure, your government is that corrupt so understandable you don't want THAT government to do anything, however its fault of American people to keep allowing such blatant and extreme corruption to exist in the government in the first place, and if you did anything about it, you could end up with one which is not, or at least way less corrupt, in which case you would want them having ability to ceise coins from criminals, including corruption within the government, and banks, and corporations etc. Any normal human being would want this, and there are other perfectly valid reasons to be able to do this, just because you don't see it doesn't mean they don't exist. So, court order can for sure make actual nodes (MINERS) which is not a great number of, as pointed out by Craig (also proving yet again that BTC's narrative of user's having any power in running non-mining "nodes" is just plain false), can indeed do all those things Craig says they can... and will do eventually. Craig is making an extremely important point doing things this way, and you people just don't get it.

[@jackpitts5561]

Yes.

[@sharpvidtube]

It seems to appeal to some people, no idea why. Bankers must love it, as it makes the BSV version of Bitcoin pointless.

[@narinwon1389]

why not?

[@flagermusen]

Why do people think Satoshi was an anarchist? There's actually no evidence of that. He even responded in the negative when someone asserted Bitcoin was to be outside the reach of government.

[@creeptokid6733]

So if I understand correctly, “Satoshi” stumped on the hard drive with the keys to make a point that bitcoin is unencrypted, and now only the court can move the coins. That is not what he promised couple years back, when he said he is going to move the coins no?

[@donwandle4514]

😂

[@codykingham4089]

The funny thing is, he doesn't quite claim this. He says he destroyed the keys which make it "extremely difficult but not impossible" to sign in the future, lol

[@creeptokid6733]

@@codykingham4089 Well, he is 100% correct. There is a statistical chance of guessing the private key. It is possible yet extremely hard to do 🤣

[@creeptokid6733]

@@CelonixCleaningServicesLLC Technically and practically the man is a hoax, courts will zero power to move even a sat, regardless if almighty they be

[@timothytimtayshuncurry2717]

@@codykingham4089 - well, there is ....something that makes it even MORE difficult for him to sign....

[@jolantasokalska4201]

Please Jessica Dont talk❤❤

[@morningworm]

Satoshi is most likely the main architect behind Bitcoin.. bringing in others as needed

[@mickeydrago9401]

Really probably the best and most direct name for the development of Bitcoin would be Adam Back and his hash cash which is even referenced in the white paper. Plenty of people think Satoshi is Adam... At the very least in part... BENZ may have invented the car but he didn't invent the wheel

[@mosesreaganpaulrajendran8206]

Nick sazbo is nakamoto SATOSHI

[@harleylimassol211]

3:30 no sign no Satoshi. Lol