It's always mindboggling to read that 70% of US citizens consider themselves religious (or that religion plays a major part in their life) as someone from a secular country, in my whole life I've maybe met a handful of people here that were actually religious.
@Joeobrown16 жыл бұрын
i imagine this was difficult to write without causing offence to everyone, religious or not - impressively done.
@nunnyahbixniz67096 жыл бұрын
213 BUTT-HURT CREATIONISTS!
@Lifeskeyishappiness5 жыл бұрын
As an Agnostic I love learning about different religions. Thanks for this informative video from an open-minded perspective! :)
@bubbercakes5284 жыл бұрын
Agnostics are those who haven’t finished their homework.
@moonlightray84936 жыл бұрын
When you think about it, Churches are actually just really extensive book clubs 😂
@MakeMeThinkAgain6 жыл бұрын
And tax shelters.
@Saint_nobody6 жыл бұрын
They are the original, social networks. ☺
@AbbeyRoadkill16 жыл бұрын
A book club that only ever studies one book. Zzzzz 😪
@Saint_nobody6 жыл бұрын
AbbeyRoadkill1 no. The Bible is not _one_ book per se. It's a collection of, on average, 66 books.
@ayycardinal68025 жыл бұрын
@@Saint_nobody Who said anything about the Bible?
@Tselel6 жыл бұрын
Oh hey. The comments are relatively tame. I think that's the sign of a well made video and healthy community. Good job, CC. To contribute to discussion, wherever you fall on the religious spectrum, remember that your greatest love informs your life direction as a whole.
@Garland416 жыл бұрын
I feel you missed a big opportunity in this video, especially near the end in the section called "How religious practice in the US differs across race and class lines," where you could have mentioned Auguste Comte's understanding of religion as being a thing in which people orient their life in which he attempted to create the secular _Religion of Humanity._ It may be the case that you may have a video on the sociological aspect of what practicing religion does for people with the secularization of young people. Similarly, the author bell hooks has written that an aspect of Feminism is for people to have a healthy spiritual life, so there seems to be an aspect of practice there as well beyond the simple (badly formulated) question of God or no God.
@crashcourse6 жыл бұрын
This is the only video we're doing on this topic, and certainly there is far more to the sociology of religion than we could cover in ten minutes, but these are solid recommendations for further reading. (Obviously less for you, the commenter, than for anyone else who might happen upon this comment!)
@timothymclean6 жыл бұрын
The effects of religion on society could make for an entire Crash Course series of its own. Of course, its comments would make the comments for Crash Course Sociology look like a mom texting her kids...
@drenrin21206 жыл бұрын
I really wish you would all consider doing more episodes on the impact religion has on society. Both good and bad and all in between.
@lakrids-pibe6 жыл бұрын
A mom texting her kids: Well That's Fine
@mohammadtausifrafi82776 жыл бұрын
I think religion is anything with followers claiming authority over inter subjective morality, as other characteristics mentioned are probably not universal: there are religions without deities or the sacred. This is just my personal opinion.
@pranjal9675 жыл бұрын
I love your sociology videos, since you take on topics from different perspectives and theories, hence producing a more logical argument, instead of following the trend or finding faults in everything. Great educational videos.
@Light-Love116 жыл бұрын
You misquoted the Old Testament about Adam and Eve. Eve was created to 'help' Adam because he was alone (Genesis, Chapter 2 Verse 18), not to 'serve' him. Also, if Eve was created from Adam's body, then she too was in the image of God. Chapter 5 Verses 1-2 implies this by saying that Adam and Eve were one unit called 'Man'
@Vospader216 жыл бұрын
Hey Nicole I just want to let you know these videos helped me study for my CLEP exam. This video was especially helpful, there were several questions related to religion on my test the answers to which you give in this video. Very lucky for me that you dropped it two days before my test.
@Jeff-bm4lb6 жыл бұрын
Literally have an exam tomorrow for this, thanks!
@Mr.Pine.6 жыл бұрын
CoolDudeHD good luck
@ayycardinal68025 жыл бұрын
Did you pass?
@maybenotme19946 жыл бұрын
Small correction - the Star of David is not considered sacred in Judaism. It's a symbol of the Jewish people, much in the same way that the rainbow flag became a symbol for LGBT people. But unlike the cross, it has no real religious meaning.
@LifeAsRick5 жыл бұрын
I LOVE YOU AND YOUR VIDEOS! I am a sociology major in my senior year and you always help me with my assignments. Thanks crashcourse, she needs a raise! 👏🏾👏🏾
@OBear075 жыл бұрын
great stuff! difficult to do a brief overview of such a complex topic, and you nailed it! thank you for these great videos.
@mrsELEVATED15 жыл бұрын
i love you for the work you do. My sociology professor is a quack and if not for you, I would be screwed.
@nadeemqwerty5 жыл бұрын
Loved your videos, densely packed with relevant information. For those who are heated, she is just sharing some ideas of the anthropologist.
@dr.helanadarwin79296 жыл бұрын
This is such a great video! Thank you for making it so much easier to teach soc of religion!
@LauraDFTBA6 жыл бұрын
I don't know if you're going to continue or expand on this topic but it would be interesting if you explored a little on 'civil religion' - displays of nationalism and patriotism acting in place of displays of traditional piety. I know of it in theory but a CrashCourse to touch on the finer points and implications would be great.
@imadeausernamethislongl44126 жыл бұрын
Bet you majority of the people who will disagree with this video are religious one way or another. All religious individuals who disagree with this video will think their religion is the correct religion. While they will display massive cognitive dissonance. Great video! Love Sociology!
@imadeausernamethislongl44126 жыл бұрын
Humans can do good with secular programs without the need of religion now.
@abdulazizrushdi91546 жыл бұрын
There is nothing to disagree on.... She's saying some facts, not opinions. You don't agree/disagree with facts. Facts are not for you to approve of.
@carlleeworthy22485 жыл бұрын
This video was surprisingly non-biased . By the way only very few faiths claim divinity , about 5 out of several thousand , so your second assumption would be inaccurate.
@andrewthomas32536 жыл бұрын
Can we get a Crash Course Religion please...?!
@LesNasesdu386 жыл бұрын
There's already a Crash Course Mythology.
@abdulazizrushdi91546 жыл бұрын
Lohmra gondein You don't know that difference between religion and mythology? If you watched that you'd have known. I think it was explained in the first episode.
@LesNasesdu386 жыл бұрын
Yep, I know that. And I'm assuming that if they chose Mythology instead of Religion, it's because by doing so they can keep a distance and prevent people to be offended. But by studying myths, they're also giving people data to gain perspective on their own beliefs without questionning them directly, but somehow implicitely questioning faith and religious insitutions without getting their hands "dirty". For example, the similarities between the the multiple creations of the world or the lives of some important religious figures may allow someone not to take what religions tell litterally. They're smart people at Crash Course, they know what they're doing :)
@abdulazizrushdi91546 жыл бұрын
Lohmra gondein Hhmm I don't know about that. Talking from a personal perspective, I wouldn't mind someone on youtube discussing my religion/beliefs as long as they get their information straight. But I can see how others might be offended though..... After all, people are becoming more of snow-flakes these days.
@LesNasesdu386 жыл бұрын
Absolutely :)
@lGalaxisl6 жыл бұрын
If you focus on the skin colour of abel and kain, you are both seeing things that aren't there in the text, and missing the point of the story
@ayycardinal68025 жыл бұрын
If you ignore it, than you are ignoring facts. You are a weak snowflake, she wasn't targetting anyone, just speaking truth.
@benling57566 жыл бұрын
just...thank yall for making this info accessible and doing your best to share sociology, sorry for all the commenters who apparently believe that opinions formed on personal experience and prejudice outweigh decades of empirical research
@StephenGoff7774 жыл бұрын
Correction: Eve didn't sin because she 'tempted' Adam. Eve sinned because she ate of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil which was the one thing that God told them not to do. Both acted on their own will. Both are equally colupable. You need a different example.
@cast8976 жыл бұрын
Im practicing my english with your videos.. Uh i think you speak fast but i believe i can understand without subtitles if i watch your vids everyday I want to make my mind get used to this english vilocity What do you think about it? Im from Brazil
@AR15ORIGINAL5 жыл бұрын
Hey! I'm also a Brazillian and youtube videos helped me greatly improve my listening comprehension. Good luck with your learning of the language.
@jeiku53146 жыл бұрын
Parents think you're disrespectful when you don't let them disrespect you.
@Arombli6 жыл бұрын
Well power does not equal disrespect maybe.
@leaveme35596 жыл бұрын
Onlyeveryone ....power and respect are part of a same circle...they may not be same...but they depend on each other
@Saint_nobody6 жыл бұрын
Respect goes hand in hand with honor. Yet the two are not the same.
@samanthah14365 жыл бұрын
A level sociology on this next week :(((
@sarahViofriend1715 жыл бұрын
Mine is in october a level sociology 😭😭
@mhamzamoosa4 жыл бұрын
@@sarahViofriend171 Mine just got postponed.
@raghavkohli5204 жыл бұрын
it would be really helpful if you consider entire world instead of just keeping US at center stage. videos content and graphics are amazing.
@juliecastin6 жыл бұрын
I'm a Christian and theologian (pre-doc now) and this video was pretty interesting (in some cases a bit biased), nonetheless helpful! Thanks a lot! :) But where is Weber? (Or did I miss it?) God bless (Yes I do believe in the 'invisible guy' please let's not be childish here
@lduych6 жыл бұрын
Faith is the pinnacle of arrogance, rooted in the cowardice of denying one's ignorance when confronted by mystery. Faith is the deadliness of all vices, a kind of brain death elevated to the status of virtue; and worse even than war, because with faith there can be no reasoning, no negotiating, no compromise, no peace. *"Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe."* _~Albert Einstein_
@juliaprohaska92956 жыл бұрын
Everyone's excited for the non-existent war in the comments😂😂😂
@Lucanoptek6 жыл бұрын
Julia Prohaska yes we're waiting for it to beggin while eating pop corns xp
@jeffbrownstain6 жыл бұрын
We're too good here
@jeffbrownstain6 жыл бұрын
+
@schlondpoofa5295 жыл бұрын
wow the comment section is peaceful i love it i love you smart people who dont like wars
@gracebrown37336 жыл бұрын
I was waiting for this topic to crop up. I'm so happy! I love studying religion.
@Crazael6 жыл бұрын
If you go to other parts of the world, those same figures you mentioned as all being 'white' tend to start looking like the people native to that region in the earlier art. In Cuzco, there are lots of depictions of Jesus and Mary and others where they look like the native people there. In Japan, Jesus tends to look more Japanese. The only reason Jesus, God and the rest look 'white european' in those European museums is because that's what the people painting them looked like.
@varana6 жыл бұрын
And that's exactly what she meant - religious art tends to reinforce the existing power structure. In Europe, God tends to be a white guy because those were the ones holding power, and others were outsiders.
@---uf2zl6 жыл бұрын
varana312 It's not about power but rather an habitude.
@Ggdivhjkjl6 жыл бұрын
Have you ever seen Ethiopian Christian art?
@benjaminlquinlan87025 жыл бұрын
Why oh why is the Marxist lense used to look at religion... It didn't even get economics right...
@Nihilnovus6 жыл бұрын
Very impressed that Jehovah’s Witnesses were even mentioned in this. I love that she’s speaking from a completely objective standpoint with all of these faiths because it’s so easier to be biased when it comes to this
@joshuapeterson96916 жыл бұрын
All of these videos are going to be American-centric. Anyone that wants a substantial discussion of sociology will go beyond these videos to find the more nuanced approaches. These videos are helpful at introducing concepts using some particulars.
@Saint_nobody6 жыл бұрын
Cheeky.
@drenrin21206 жыл бұрын
Yeah, I have to point out, Jane Black, the target audience for all Crash Course videos tends to be Americans. That considered, they talked in the video how the vast majority of Americans identify as some kind of Christian. Hence, you know, just knowing your audience and how to ease them into difficult topics of conversation.
@Nihilnovus6 жыл бұрын
What religion isn’t a cult in the end
@TytoAlpha6 жыл бұрын
pretty good video but placing vajrayana buddhist iconography alongside "Chinese emperors were believed to have a mandate from heaven..." looks really bad. This sort of channel should not be making these kinds of mistakes. Further, the distinction between Churches as Durkheim understood them is contrasted here with "sects" in a way that is new to me and doesn't make much sense, especially because the sects that you list are perhaps better understood as denominations within a Church (Christianity).
@fangjiunnewe36346 жыл бұрын
+
@oscarfellows67096 жыл бұрын
+
@timothymclean6 жыл бұрын
I'm a little disappointed that you didn't go into the differences between organized Abrahamic religions and other, less-organized faiths operate. But I guess 11 minutes only lets you cover so many topics...
@emilymylove58066 жыл бұрын
they all sucks the same
@timothymclean6 жыл бұрын
Not really. I see where you're coming from, but the effects of, say, Catholicism are _vastly_ different than Buddhism. Catholicism was an institution with power, with the ability to force its own view of itself on the world and directly compete with other dominant institutions. Less-organized religions like Hinduism and Buddhism are more subject to individual or local interpretation, preventing them from having as much direct influence.
@emilymylove58066 жыл бұрын
well! I don't care.... Its just foolish.... The thing they all agree on is just philosophy like do good, be good, think good ... blah blah...
@gingercore696 жыл бұрын
Emily MyLove well, that depends, certain "sects" use empiric rituals, wich mean they cant be manipulated as easy as others, so it changes how we experience the spirituality that religion can bring to some people
@drenrin21206 жыл бұрын
Emily, you should care. Whether you're a Dawkin's drooling fan boy or a smart atheist, religion affects every society you could attempt to assimilate into. There's no escaping that fact and the next generation will only have slightly better luck at it than you. I hope they go into the broader differences in later episodes. Over all though, I do think this was a fine introduction to the viewscope of sociologists trying to understand and compartmentalize the affect of religion on societies. There is plenty more to talk about.
@gabrielenriquemartinezllan4796 жыл бұрын
Simply thank you, Crash Course!!!
@ronsapien42126 жыл бұрын
thanks, your videos are gonna get me through exams🙄
@VandrefalkTV6 жыл бұрын
Brilliant video, cheers!
@aymawetmerkit62236 жыл бұрын
Have to tell you that the picture presented at 4:30 when talking about Chinese emperor is more likely from the Indian culture and have no connection with Chinese emperor.
@seemoremoreable Жыл бұрын
your lesson is perfectly concise compared to other recturer in this Ch. thx for this great course.
@NelsonFunez-hk9zu Жыл бұрын
anyone else watching this for a class ???
@AlexanderZapataIndividual6 жыл бұрын
I am so close in figuring out the # of angels that can dance in a pin tho.
@centori20116 жыл бұрын
Alexander+ I figured it out and the answer is none sorry to say but then again were much better off with that answer.
@Saint_nobody6 жыл бұрын
I've got one angel on 4 tacks. Art for sale, hit me up on Hangouts.
@uyousyouruieyesi70545 жыл бұрын
It’s Pi.
@kobked-x5 жыл бұрын
the answer is Zero because fictional characters don't dance in real life...
@JurassicLion20496 жыл бұрын
If you’re just here to comment and spread hate in these comments or call everyone who abscribes to a certain pov as evil or dumb, you’re part of the problem and missing the point of this video which is education and why people have faith.
@Laura-qp9iw6 жыл бұрын
++++
@devilsadvocate7016 жыл бұрын
The Flying Lion Is "faith" an accurate method of determining what is true Or not?
@Navesblue6 жыл бұрын
Troll Hunter You're only proving Lion's point here by exemplifying what they're saying. POV isn't about true or false (that's fascist) it's about having perspective around the two.
@devilsadvocate7016 жыл бұрын
Navesblue That depends on if you value emotion more than truth.
@Navesblue6 жыл бұрын
Troll Hunter I don't believe in false dichotomies like most physicalists do. Emotions are their own form of truth in that they are intrinsically tied to value judgements. Your strictly closed-minded definition of truth is undoubtedly what is physically external to people's perceptions. Yet that doesn't instruct us on what to do with what we find.
@yeabBirru4 жыл бұрын
Nowhere in the Bible suggests or implies that what God marked Cain by was his skin color
@jmcadoesvids3596 жыл бұрын
i dont know, personally the concept of becoming a celestial slave does not motivate me to want to go to heaven
@abdulazizrushdi91546 жыл бұрын
Lol then you have no idea what heaven is or what it has. Honestly neither do I, which makes it exciting xD
@jmcadoesvids3596 жыл бұрын
abdulaziz rushdi i dont like worshipping and i cannot imagine doing it forever
@abdulazizrushdi91546 жыл бұрын
juan manuel mc You probably didn't even try it :/
@jmcadoesvids3596 жыл бұрын
abdulaziz rushdi i was in a seminary
@jtrlatinist22276 жыл бұрын
I've brought this up before of this channel but, I will do it again mostly good info here! But when you get it wrong you get it really wrong. I want to thank you for the content.
@AbearhamLincoln6 жыл бұрын
Hey, incorrect detail here (and I don't mean to be pedantic), but not all Methodists and Baptists are Evangelical, and some Lutherans and Presbyterians are Evangelicals. Evangelicalism is an interdenominational movement, not a category of denominations at large.
@CaseyJewels6 жыл бұрын
I love your videos, though every now and then I disagree with something said. However, those are always minor things, and I don't fault you for them. What you said about Eve in this video though... It's wrong. Eve wasn't made to serve and obey Adam--otherwise she would have been made from his foot. Instead, she is made from his rib--his side--because she is equal to him, and they are meant to serve and love one another.
@ActiveAdvocate16 жыл бұрын
The reason why some religious laws look secular is because they originally were. Take "Thou shall not kill" as an example. That was ripped STRAIGHT from the Hammurabi Code, a secular set of laws and rules created by the Mesopotamian king Hammurabi. Jewish law especially was highly influenced by the Near East and Middle East because of the Babylonian Exile, as Babylon was a part of what we call Mesopotamia, and would therefore ascribe to the Hammurabi Code. Hell, most if not all of the Torah was written down during the Babylonian Exile, though a lot of it had been oral tradition up till that time. When Cyrus the Great freed the Hebrews and they went back to Palestine, those laws just became part of their culture, hence things like the Ten Commandments and pretty much everything law-related found in the Pentateuch.
@justicar3476 жыл бұрын
SoulFire39 I think your argument has a small flaw. Hammurabi Code was, to my understanding, suppose to have been passed down from the gods. In ancient times there was not a lot of distinction between secular and religious authority. The old testament has laws that could be seen as only serving secular purposes, and yet were recorded in religious text because there was not really a distinction.
@ActiveAdvocate16 жыл бұрын
Very true, now that I think about it. There was no such thing as church/state separation because the church WAS the state. Most nations were theocratic, or at least to a certain extent, at the time.
@stelanora78276 жыл бұрын
to be fair, the majority of the ten commandments are just common sens for any social structure, you can't really have a society if people are aloud to murder each other
@Saint_nobody6 жыл бұрын
Irrelevant and irreverent.
@anttibjorklund18696 жыл бұрын
One thing you could have talked about is the idea of "civil religion", that is that certain public rituals (like watching the Super Bowl, which unites many Americans) or symbols (like the flag) can take on a certain type of religious connotation.That isn't to say that they are a part of a religion in the traditional sense, but that these symbols and events can share similarities with them. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_religion
@nathanjplatt6 жыл бұрын
Watched with a open mind.....Now I'm just here refreshing the comments eating popcorn waiting for the inevitable fights in the comments.
@juliaprohaska92956 жыл бұрын
Nathan Platt Me too😉👐
@nathanjplatt6 жыл бұрын
Maybe some see the title of the video, watch it and ignore the comments, because they are constantly being put down by those who aren't religious.
@nathanjplatt6 жыл бұрын
Yes I did......also yes I did move on, except now to reply before going to bed.....only comment I made on this or any other video....But you are welcome to try again.
@Saint_nobody6 жыл бұрын
Nathan Platt do you prefer more butter or salt?
@nathanjplatt6 жыл бұрын
Darth I prefer more salt on the popcorn.....Just enough butter that it is not bland.
@BowserGaming19856 жыл бұрын
Nice video I learned something new
@IgorNaverniouk6 жыл бұрын
Great! Did you learn anything correct?
@JustHorseyMie4 жыл бұрын
I would say religion is a social construct based upon societal norms, to further drive home the need to behave a certain way to get a society to be cohesive and not disruptive. Common sense lead to the birth of religion as a tool to instill these values in people.
@Apledore6 жыл бұрын
Actually, the Bible says that Eve was created to help Adam, not to serve and obey.
@HamStew246 жыл бұрын
Apledore doesn't matter either way because none of it's true
@megerbig4 жыл бұрын
These videos always match up perfectly with my notes. I love Crash Course
@davidcampos14636 жыл бұрын
A very well done distillation of religion. But of course, we have to have the effervescence of the commentary section to go with it.
@PunkProfess0r5 жыл бұрын
In my graduate work, I approach religion as a social technology that acts as a facilitator of moral support to individual families. The family is the fundamental social unit, and religious practice is the number one indicator of the success or failure of the family. Religious practice contributes to more pro social outcomes than any other structure. So I don’t focus on whether religion is “true” or whether god exists, I look at it mostly sociologically, which it turns out to be one of the most powerful and effective technologies that humans have invented. How can anyone be against socially progressive and prosocial technologies?
@mufasaiam77946 жыл бұрын
What were you thinking CrashCourse, you should've disabled the comment section.
@solaireofastora36 жыл бұрын
mustapha supas Lol
@Laura-qp9iw6 жыл бұрын
This comment section seems more civil than some of their other videos. Also I like that they don't disable the comments. It allows freedom of speech. And even though there may be some hateful comments, I have actually been able to have really good conversations under some of their more controversial videos in the past.
@honesty12346 жыл бұрын
Laura Ingouf civil ahhh....
@holythirteenx16 жыл бұрын
These comments are triggering me, I need a safe space where my ideas can't be challenged. It's insane how progressive libs set themselves up for failure by cutting off all criticism that could lead to better arguments, but I can yell at insane right-wingers for hours and they just laugh at the notion that my insults can affect their emotional state in any significant way.
@mufasaiam77946 жыл бұрын
Sticky obviously you're not aware that some people have set their minds on chaos. They'll write a comment that angers everyone and there's nothing anybody can do about it. Welcome to the internet
@rachelkimball3126 жыл бұрын
"...To serve and obey Adam?" Your show is great and seems to be mostly non-bias however, this is an ignorant statement. Might I suggest that your show research this further to get an accurate definition of the creation of man and the original marriage relationship.
@TheAfc93r5 жыл бұрын
Rachel Kimball you are correct my lady. It just said Adam needed a helper to harvest the land. I guess Chapter 2 verse 18 The LORD God said, “It is not good for the man to be alone. I will make a helper suitable for him.” is up to each interpretation.
@psychmaestro85286 жыл бұрын
Religion = Clickbait/Comment Wars I hope this will be a peaceful comment section this time :)
@Saint_nobody6 жыл бұрын
They've actually been rather tame in comparison to the debates I've otherwise been involved with.
@leaveme35596 жыл бұрын
It's actually fun.... reading the hate comments.....where one tries to prove that there version of god is the best...and other stating that it doesn't even exist at all.....I mean common every one loves to fight...I do it some times for fun....
@Zekushiiido6 жыл бұрын
yeah hopefully you wont get assassinated here Heneral Luna
@enochlee30246 жыл бұрын
Hi, I really like the way of this analysis and I did learn a lot from this series. I agree with most of the content expect for the inequality of man and woman in the bible. In modern theology and teaching in church, it is said that women makes man(or the creation of mankind) complete in the same way as man (or the creation of mankind) makes God's creation complete. Please refer to Genesis and "Systematic theology" by John Frame. Thank you.
@inspiration28 Жыл бұрын
This was a very amazing and Insightful video. Thanks so much!
@patrik52234 жыл бұрын
It could be an idea to include more pictures and graphs when you drop these many figures, especially about where how many has what religion.
@DecodeChannel6 жыл бұрын
Properly read, the Bible is the most potent force for atheism ever conceived.
@Mr.Pine.6 жыл бұрын
Decode Channel what u mean.
@DQABlack6 жыл бұрын
Meaning, if you actually read the bible instead of just listening to selective pieces that you're told about it, aka through sermons or devotionals, you will no longer wish to be a part of the religion. The god of the bible is genocidal and masochistic, and many of the stories are ludicrous. Most christians never look close enough to realize the evil they worship.
@Sir.suspicious6 жыл бұрын
+gaming_on_pine That if you read the bible trough the lens of an atheist you can call all of that bogus, but, men reading that must be a lot of work, not worth my effort at least
@Navesblue6 жыл бұрын
For those who can't read in figurative language and do not understand allegory.
@Garland416 жыл бұрын
Simply put, your language is problematic because, and you can put multiple philosophical ideas behind this, use simply state properly, but then we must ask what is proper?
@hassenfepher6 жыл бұрын
i had a tough time keeping my attention on all the religious statistics. perhaps some graphics would help keep attention when putting out so many numbers at once.
@peace6066 жыл бұрын
Religion: doing what you are told regardless that is right. Morality: doing what is right regardless what you are told.
@peace6066 жыл бұрын
pizistrat Its not a completely true statement, but it has a relatable truth to it and it is quite funny :)
@abdulazizrushdi91546 жыл бұрын
Hmmmm. What if religion tells you to obey your morality? BOOOM
@alvinocyber96874 жыл бұрын
Well, since Christianity is discussed a lot in this video, it's necessary for someone who knows a lot about it to point out what has been wrongly taught by this video about Christianity.. I may not know much about sociology, but I do know THAT MUCH about Christianity: -Not all denominations in Protestant Christianity believe that the Ten Commandments are still to be held by the Church nowadays. In short, only some of them do. Catholicism has their own Ten Commandments that are different from the Ten Commandments that both Jewish religion and Protestant Christianity believe in. I don't know what Orthodox Christianity does teach about this stuff. Btw, you're gonna know what the word 'denomination' in Protestant Christianity actually means later on if you KEEP ON reading my text. -Calvinism / predestination: a teaching in Christianity that teaches that The Lord and Savior Jesus Christ had died on the cross only for saving the 'elects' a.k.a people whom the Father in heaven has chosen to save from their eternal punishment in the lake of fire after the Final Judgment has taken place. All the 'non-elects' will be thrown into the lake of fire for the rest of eternity. -In Christianity, both men and women are created in God's image (Genesis 1:26-27). However, women are created as helpers for their husband indeed (Genesis 2:18). -Both Adam and Eve caused the original sin, even though it's true that it was Eve who caused Adam to eat the forbidden fruit as well (Genesis 3:6; 1 Timothy 2:14). In Christianity, it's taught that because of Adam, everyone has sinned (Romans 5:12). -Are women not allowed in speak in local churches? The apostles made it that way since it was how the culture went at that time and they didn't want societies at that time to view Christianity negatively: 1 Corinthians 14:34-35 {NKJV} [Let your women keep silent in the churches, for they are not permitted to speak; but they are to be submissive, as the law also says. And if they want to learn something, let them ask their own husbands at home; for it is shameful for women to speak in church.] -Cain was marked with a darker skin...?? C'mon, do I really need to tell you guys what is meant by God marking Cain?? Genesis 4:13-15 {NKJV} [And Cain said to the Lord, “My punishment is greater than I can bear! Surely You have driven me out this day from the face of the ground; I shall be hidden from Your face; I shall be a fugitive and a vagabond on the earth, and it will happen that anyone who finds me will kill me.” And the Lord said to him, “Therefore, whoever kills Cain, vengeance shall be taken on him sevenfold.” And the Lord set a mark on Cain, lest anyone finding him should kill him.] -In Protestant Christianity, there are a lot of movements and denominations. The term 'movements' here refer to Christianity movements and these movements differ by what their teachings concentrate on. Examples of this include the Evangelical movement which concentrates their teachings on evangelism and the Charismatic movement which concentrates their teachings on spiritual gifts. Lutheran, Evangelical, Charismatic, Methodist, and Baptist are some of the Christianity movements that exist worldwide. The term 'denominations' here are indeed what the video has taught about, except the fact that they're not the same as the Christianity movements. Most denominations belong to a Christianity movement, but every denomination has their own teachings and interpretations of the Protestant Christian Bible. Examples of denominations include Seventh-Day Adventist and Indonesian Church of Christ. All local churches in Protestant Christianity belong to a denomination. -Pentecostals aren't sects, but are instead what a number of denominations in Protestant Christianity would refer themselves to. ...it's indeed true that the people of God will be destroyed IF they lack knowledge (Hosea 4:6).. to tremble before The Lord is actually the beginning of knowledge, but fools despise wisdom and instruction (Proverbs 1:7). The Protestant Christian Bible, or just the Bible in short, is actually the Word of God that's been useful for guiding His people in righteousness 🙏🙏 (2 Timothy 3:16).. People who are believing unto God have His Word guiding their everyday life... With having knowledge of the Word of God, living a blameless life in front of The Lord is not an impossible thing to do...! Know that the only God and Savior Jesus Christ loves you and wants you to come to the knowledge of the truth and to be saved in His name (1 Timothy 2:4)! There's indeed no salvation aside from in His name (Acts 4:12).. just accept Him as your Lord and Savior and you'll be saved (John 3:16; Romans 10:9). The grace of The Lord and Savior Jesus Christ be with all of you every day...! 1 Timothy 2:3-4 {NKJV} [For this is good and acceptable in the sight of God our Savior, who desires all men to be saved and to come to the knowledge of the truth.]
@tulsaTMR6 жыл бұрын
As a Catholic, I loved how this video dealt with such a potentially contentious issue in an extremely fair and even minded way. Thanks again for the makers of this series and channel!
@emsavings6 жыл бұрын
Disappointed that when talking about how religions have helped social movements, Jewish involvement in the civil rights movement was not mentioned at all.
@AndrewAttard786 жыл бұрын
Without getting into conspiracy theory I think this episode should have also talked about secret cults and the elites. There is enough evidence that it could have been a sub-topic.
@nocasalexandra4 жыл бұрын
you're again saving my essays amen
@topherchris764 жыл бұрын
Damn she talks too fast
@hadeslive80814 жыл бұрын
You know considering there is a huge number of people not living in US, you could have used world wide references rather than just American references. It was a great start to the video which ended on a bit confusing note.
@najex16 жыл бұрын
Let people belief in whatever religion they want. The wise and good among them will find strenght, purpose, compasion, and comfort in their beliefs. The fools and the cruel among them would be so no matter their religion or lack theiroff.
@najex16 жыл бұрын
Not that I disagree, but I was making a point about letting people be. Not forcing comfrontation between ideas. More specificly: when people use their religion as a reason to do good (which I define as causing happiness in others and yourself), you don't need to point it out if you think those reasons are flawed.
@najex16 жыл бұрын
When it comes to morality, I don't think their exists a single best 'truth'. Theirfor I am hesitant to force comfrontation between them. The key word you used is 'allowed' to compete, not forced to compete. If an idea has a possitive effect (again, defined as short and long term happiness) it shouldn't need to justify its existence beyond that. Ideas and believes should serve humanity, not the other way around.
@jacksonfurlong37576 жыл бұрын
I'd prefer it if we'd stop spreading superstitious lies, particularly to children. You don't need religion to find wisdom or do good works. In fact, your statement is almost the complete opposite of the truth. A good person will do good deeds regardless of religious prodding whereas religious convictions are an excellent way to make an otherwise good person do something truly monstrous. History is replete with such things
@aperson222226 жыл бұрын
Well said.
@najex16 жыл бұрын
"You don't need religion to find wisdom or do good works." I agrea with this, absolutely. The rest not so much. Are you refering to the idea that a good deed done for non-rigious reasons are somehow more valuable? I don't agrea. To me actions matter, not the underlining reasons behind it (so long as they aren't forced by an outside force). Or are you saying that religion can't lead to doing good deeds? In this video the example of the Southern Christian leadership comference was given as a supporter for the civil rights movement. I don't think that terrible acts in the world will significantly degrease if religion were to disapear. Only the reasons why they are done would change. Patriotisme, duty, justice, hate, short sightedness.
@jeremymiller41896 жыл бұрын
Not talking about Karl Marx in a sociology course is like not talking about evolution in a biology course.
@SolSystemDiplomat6 жыл бұрын
Marx’s ideas ultimately failed. Evolution actually works
@jeremymiller41896 жыл бұрын
They have not failed. Structural functionalist, conflict theory, and symbolic interactionist are sociological paradigms.
@chrysalizubeth886 жыл бұрын
That version of Adam and Eve added a bit to Genesis.
@yingkouzen6 жыл бұрын
i missed how they used to put a slide of the key contributors to the theory while presenting the theory e.g. a slide of Karl Marx face while the presenter talks about their theories and observations.
@GDMiller4196 жыл бұрын
Not to be an apologist, but your classification of Pentecostals is contradictory. they are evangelical Christians (church), but you list them as a sect.
@musiclover1995v6 жыл бұрын
True! This confused me a lot, but I guess there are pentecost churches that operate more like sects, as well as ones that operate as normal churches (like the one I go to)
@kavyasekar28532 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the beautiful explanation,!!
@BrajanarayanPanda6 жыл бұрын
Could you do another video on totemic religion as the begining of religion as described by Durkheim. It would be really helpful.
@staci804 жыл бұрын
This is totally unrelated and a little weird, but I think your teeth are super cool!!
@bogdantabacaru11226 жыл бұрын
Thank you for a wonderfully informative video! What's your take on the "Mormon" Church and Church of Scientology? Are they indeed Churches or Sects? Are they even worth mentioning seeing as they are, in lack of other words, newer than well established Churches such as Christianity and Islam?
@Saint_nobody6 жыл бұрын
Bogdan Tabacaru I don't know about Scientology. But, as a Mormon, I can easily tell you, the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints is Christian.
@Norimarisu6 жыл бұрын
The IRS says they are religions
@hankmmxviii26406 жыл бұрын
Well you didn’t include how sacrifice and blood has always held meaning and sacredness in both modern and archaic cultures all over the world.
@judemartinfernandeznaca14974 жыл бұрын
solo-learning, approved!
@lGalaxisl6 жыл бұрын
In genesis, Adam and Eve are equals and both are created in the image of God. If Eve wasn't, she would've been made in the same stage as when God created the fish and the cattle.
@TheAfc93r5 жыл бұрын
I don't understand the concept of a women's role in Christianity or Judaism. In the Bible women have clearly authority in some cases which was ordain by God. Deborah was a judge over the people of Israel at one point...Hell she even has her own song for crying out loud???
@jamesonstalanthasyu5 жыл бұрын
Any recommendations on religious topics that have good video quality and hosts? I am partial to those that aren't just someone talking on screen only, which is what I see a lot do. It can be liberal or conservative views. I do like how crash courses video style mixes up the visuals.
@pavitech32424 жыл бұрын
It's very useful and easy thank you crash course
@aseelghaith11966 жыл бұрын
In Islam, women aren't banned from positions with the clergy except being the Imam (which is the one who leads the prayer in Islamic Prayers) because that's just how prayer is in Islam. But other positions which are higher women take a part of it and actually had took it in the past. To be accurate; there is no such thing as relegious positions in Islam or an order for the positions. Thanx for the video!
@Mariomario-gt4oy6 жыл бұрын
Aseel ghaith uh yes they are. Women are banned from being prophets or imams or any higher standard.
@aseelghaith11966 жыл бұрын
ConfusedPorpoise Ok, but I'm just fixing that one informarion. ☺
@Mariomario-gt4oy6 жыл бұрын
Aseel ghaith you're wrong though
@aseelghaith11966 жыл бұрын
Mario mario I'm not going to convince you, but they are not banned in Islam. Sure, there is no women who are prophets, but that's just because of the natural hard missions that used to be given to prophets, not that women can't handle hard missions ( feminists don't come at me) but being a prophet who spreads the massege of God in a society that not only doesn't respect women but doesn't respect God.
@aseelghaith11966 жыл бұрын
Mario mario Well what's your proof that I'm wrong?! Are you Muslim? Did you study Islam?
@narrator696 жыл бұрын
you missed my beliefs. Long live Dudeism
@l00ttf6 жыл бұрын
You made a mistake Muslims don't face Macca because it's the birth place of the prophet they face Kabba which was built by Ibraham the father of all the prophets U should research well
@michelgabe16296 жыл бұрын
Capitalism is a religion, it sees economiv growth and everything that promotes it as sacred
@pummisher11866 жыл бұрын
It's just something to keep everyone on the "same page", as it were.
@supreme-sieger43865 жыл бұрын
Positive and negative sanctions of religions should have been mentioned.
@poorplayer92496 жыл бұрын
I always felt it was ironical that the accepted use of the words denomination and sect in the modern lexicon, generally mirrors existing positive and negative viewpoints about a given religion. Especially when one considers the evocative association which accompanies each designation and its corresponding religion. Generally positive viewpoints seem to earn that religion's subcategories a more benign descriptor, and vice versa. A bit o' bias maybe? Hmmm?
@chitradhanraj30476 жыл бұрын
Very helpful, Thanks
@LucasRibeiro-po4pb6 жыл бұрын
That interpretation of Adam and Eve is erroneous. It's an old text and if I had never read it I would.probably assume it to be sexist, but if you read it closely it is not like this. God created the woman to be equal to man and also in image of God, though you can argue that man being created first means something, it doesn't undo the explicit equality meant by the story. Secondly, while Eve was the first tempted, Adam actually sinned more, he blamed the woman and God in addition to eating the fruit, he also wasn't seduced by a very cunning entity, he gave in a lot easier than Eve. Thirdly, when God goes on to punish Adam and Eve for their disobedience, He says that Eve will suffer being subordinate to their spouses and fathers, which makes explicit that sexism is a part of the corrupt creation not of heaven and therefore not good
@SolSystemDiplomat6 жыл бұрын
Lucas Ribeiro correct!
@juliaprohaska92956 жыл бұрын
+
@theodorakarr43376 жыл бұрын
Lucas Ribeiro I agree.Good version
@juliaprohaska92956 жыл бұрын
Buuuut...overall the the behaviour of the characters in the bible is mostly sexist (there were female apostles who were just left out, etc.)
@LucasRibeiro-po4pb6 жыл бұрын
Julia Prohaska Yeah, that's right. I was only defending the Genesis narrative in an isolated manner. Altough some behaviour can easily be explained by the sinful and corrupt nature of human beings, I can not hide the fact that there are statements meant to show you the holy path that are sexist, though they tend to be very off place since they promote tyranny and the demeaning of personhood of a being created in the image of the Person God. So yeah, it's importsnt to be clear that the Bible is sexist sometimes, or at least it seems so, I have my personal theological opinions which I believe to be inappropriate for the discussion in its present condition. Anyway, thanks for the input Julia