Creation vs Evolution: What's the Difference?

Рет қаралды 3,425

Is Genesis History?

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 118

@Abidingingrace-zf3tr 6 ай бұрын

Thank you guys! God bless you

@statutesofthelord 6 ай бұрын

Jesus spoke this world and everything in it into existence in 6 days, and rested the 7th. Let's keep the 7th day holy like he told us to.

@nickstreeservice4454 6 ай бұрын

Earth is old. . God put life on it 7k yrs ago. . He did not create the sun on that day. Bit much mass to be poof. . That's darwinism.

@MarcelinhoTheRock 6 ай бұрын

Another great cut

@enomiellanidrac9137 5 ай бұрын

Creation vs Evolution: What's the Difference? One is an assertion, the other is an observable fact.

@roblangsdorf8758 4 ай бұрын

@enomiellanidrac9137 Yep. The data from the creation history is observable. Most of the concepts of evolution are products of wild imagination applied to minor fragments.

@enomiellanidrac9137 4 ай бұрын

@@roblangsdorf8758 Creation, not creation history, i.e. things were all created at some point. So it is an assertion, note that I didn't say anything about whether it is supported by fact or observation, just that the concept in itself is an assertion. Evolution, not any theory attached to it, i.e. the name we use to describe that things change under the influence of external factor. So by definition it is a observed phenomenon.

@roblangsdorf8758 4 ай бұрын

@@enomiellanidrac9137 There is micro evolution that is observable. Finches beaks do change. But they seem to be programmed for change. But a T-Rex has a significantly different design than a humming bird. Whales have very different designs than apes. To transition between these requires magnificent just so tales.

@enomiellanidrac9137 4 ай бұрын

@@roblangsdorf8758 Micro-evolution isn't a thing, there is just evolution that is the fact that things change with time. You posit that such changes even accumulated on long period of time aren't enough to justify the conclusion of certain species changing into certain others and that is enough to make your point, no need to make the "micro" distinction.

@puretruthpodcast 4 ай бұрын

Well isn't a lion feline and wolf canine? Those would be two different kinds. Don't you know you can't get a dog from a cat? Therefore how can a human be related to a monkey? Or how can we all come from one living thing?

@razark9 5 ай бұрын

The difference is; Creation is an unscientific religious beliefs, whereas evolution is a demonstrable natural process supported by overwhelming science across over a dozen fields.

@RTD3 4 ай бұрын

"Science" is not God. Science also told us the world was heading for a new Ice Age in the 1970's.

@razark9 4 ай бұрын

@@RTD3 Nobody but creationists wanting to project equivalates science with god. And no. There was SOME discussions around aerosols that had a cooling effect, but it was not the consensus. The idea was amplified by the media.

@roblangsdorf8758 4 ай бұрын

@razark9 Actually, it is the belief in evolution that is the non-scientific religious belief with no basis in real science. But the mantras have been repeated so often that many people believe them.

@razark9 4 ай бұрын

@@roblangsdorf8758 Funny how it's only the uneducated and deeply religious that can see how over a dozen scientific fields and all of the empirical journals are not only wrong, but a religion. LOL.

@razark9 4 ай бұрын

@@roblangsdorf8758 Speaking of. Are there any other empirical fields or theories that is studied worldwide you happen to have religious issues with?

@HereIam-rg3vy 5 ай бұрын

The difference is that evolution is real and creation is a fairytale

@brentjamescollins9731 5 ай бұрын

If you check out all the available evidence you will find that evolution is actually impossible having no more than wishful thinking to support it. The massively complex four bit living computer programmes that all forms of biological life consist of cannot have written themselves starting with non life as evolutionists want one to accept and believe for example! All information including computer programmes require an intelligent author to have written or programmed them in the first place, these massively complex four bit living computer programmes obviously cannot have written themselves! If you check everything out you will find that deliberate creation by something acting as a God and therefore a God is the only explanation that adds up. Evolutionists say they will have the answer one day as to how non life became life and how these living computer programmes came to be written but something that is impossible to start with can obviously never happen anyway! If you look into it you will find there is very much more evidence beside the example I have quoted above in support of purposeful creation being the only explanation that adds up to account for everything in the universe being the way it is! Regards, Brent Collins.

@therick363 5 ай бұрын

@@brentjamescollins9731how can something be impossible and be a scientific theory at the same time?

@johnnybell5000 5 ай бұрын

You have that backwards

@therick363 5 ай бұрын

@@johnnybell5000 how is a scientific theory a fairytale

@Skwid-Lives Ай бұрын

⁠@@therick363because it lacks any truth. It’s prob less true than any fairy tale you’ve ever heard. A fairy tale has more probability than Evolution

@kennethswenson6214 5 ай бұрын

The only problem with the multiple "tree" approach, is the speed at which the changes deriving from The Kind have to occur. Even discounting any effect by the "Ice Age", you would still have only several thousand years to produce over a million distinct animal species, and plants, and bacteria, and viruses, and fungi. Why this limited time? Because we know what animals we have now, and even know by fossils and the like, what animals there were, or may have been, So you have to get to a specified, unalterable, "finish" point, in a finite period of time.

@therick363 6 ай бұрын

Creation-belief. Evolution-scientific theory

@roblangsdorf8758 5 ай бұрын

Actually, creation is a statement of facts. Evolution is a fairy tale that couldn't possibly have happened. Statistical it just isn't possible.

@therick363 5 ай бұрын

@@roblangsdorf8758 really now. Okay….support your statement. Creation is statement of facts…prove the earth came before the sun….. Tell me how a scientific theory is a fairy tale…. Statistically isn’t possible….What the maths you used?

@roblangsdorf8758 5 ай бұрын

@therick363 For one, how do you go from nothing to some sort of living goo? Then how do you get this goo to evolve into you via the zoo? The story of evolution is clearly a fairy tale. How does nothing experience a quantum fluctuation that pops a universe into existence? What do the 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics tell us about whether things can evolve into higher states? Doesn't being created at a higher state and decaying to a lower level make more sense?

@roblangsdorf8758 5 ай бұрын

@therick363 You asked what math shows that evolution isn't statistically possible. The human genome contains over 3,000,000,000 pairs of code. What random chance processes could design such detailed content? For that matter, if that code was originally carefully programmed, how much of it could go bad before it would no longer function? BTW, this is just a minor issue when we begin to look at how finely turned the universe is.

@therick363 5 ай бұрын

@@roblangsdorf8758I never said from nothing. So why are you asking that? I don’t hold that view. Most don’t either. You were asked how is a scientific theory a fairly tale. Your “answer” wasn’t accurate or honest at all. Was that on purpose? _the story of evolution is clearly a fairytale_ It’s clearly a scientific theory. Evolution doesn’t say from nothing-fail on you Thermodynamics? Doesn’t hurt evolution. 1-energy can’t be created or destroyed so it’s always there 2-earth isn’t a closed system What variables and parameters were used in that maths? No theists ever share that info.

@VisshanVis 6 ай бұрын

I just can't understand why these theist KZbin channels put so much time and effort into trying to debunk and refute something that they all claim doesn't/can't happen.

@brentjamescollins9731 6 ай бұрын

Because if creation is true there are even deeper and more significant issues that arise in and from their being something acting as a God and therefore there actually being a God responsible for the creation of everything in this universe. The more evidence there is concerning the existence of God responsible for the creation of everything in this universe and that evolution cannot be possible and is not true, then inherently those human beings that do not believe and accept that there really is a God can ultimately be saved from their sins and spend eternity in heaven instead of the other bad place for eternity when they die, so finding as much evidence as possible in support of creation is even extremely important so that more people can be ultimately persuaded to believe and accept creation being the true explanation as to how everything in this universe came into being because belief in God is the first essential step towards human beings being able to be saved from the consequences of their sins! The correct answer concerning whether there really is a God or not is of vital importance for human beings because if true there are serious adverse consequences as outlined above for human beings when they die but if there is no God these serious adverse consequences obviously do not exist, but it is obviously very important to try to be as sure as possible concerning the reality or otherwise of the existence of God! Regards, Brent Collins.

@rbee29 6 ай бұрын

Why do evolutionists continue to pursue the hypothesis of evolution when every direction they take is a dead end?

@VisshanVis 6 ай бұрын

@@rbee29Dead end???, evolution is one the most studied and researched fields of science that continues to make new discoveries, and it's not a hypothesis it's a theory, do you also go to medical-themed KZbin channels and tell them they have no evidence or that they are wrong that if they just believed in god they would find the cure??

@ronaldmorgan7632 6 ай бұрын

Easy, because the evolutionists go out of their way to say that something supernatural cannot be the cause?

@ronaldmorgan7632 6 ай бұрын

@@VisshanVis The amount of time researched doesn't guarantee anything. Abiogenesis as been studied for quite awhile and they are still clueless. The more they research the more complicated it is. There isn't evidence that shows one species turning into another. Like the guy said, we see a bunch of different types of cats because natural selection allows for that. But, you don't see a dog turning into a cat.

@Jo_Kuiper 5 ай бұрын

The difference is: one is a fact (evolution), and the other is a made up myth (creation)

@roblangsdorf8758 4 ай бұрын

@Jo_Kuiper You have it backwards. Evolution requires lots of imagination. The creation report points to the flood of Noah’s time. In Arizona and Southern Utah, there are about 15,000 feet of sediments that were deposited in a very short amount of time.

@Jo_Kuiper 4 ай бұрын

@@roblangsdorf8758 Keep on dreaming, I know better.

@therick363 Ай бұрын

@@roblangsdorf8758so you don’t know what the basics of science are? Yet you talk about them? Oof

@throckmortensnivel2850 6 ай бұрын

The problem with the "kinds" theory is that it just arbitrarily cuts off ancestry for no apparent reason. Are lemurs and monkeys the same kind? If not, why not? Are monkeys and humans the same kind? If not, why not? After all, what is a "kind".

@fred4ester 6 ай бұрын

There is apparent reason: DNA is distinct, ability to reproduce only in same genus. Absolutely no observation of interspecies.

@iwkaoy8758 6 ай бұрын

Great question. Lermurs,monkeys and humans are different kinds. Lermurs,monkeys and humans are the cat tea Gory,but knot the same kind. Day are isle apes. Ape is a body type classifications like fish, bird, insert, lizard,ore crush stay Shawn,It has nothing two dew width descent. Example - If grey aliens from movies came two earth, day wood fowl under the ape cat tea Gory two,but it does ant make dim and other apes own earth rie lay Ted.

@puretruthpodcast 4 ай бұрын

@throckmortensnivel2850 4 ай бұрын

@@puretruthpodcast Which doesn't answer the question, "What is a kind?" What are the criteria for determining which animals belong to which "kind"? Do genetics play a role in that determination?

@josellers1376 4 ай бұрын

Very good video. Creation/fact vs evolution/lie and exaggeration. Animals change with in their own kinds, like cats of the jungle can adapt to an open plains environment over a relatively short time. And the famous moths of England changed from pale to black color during the industrial revolution. And changed back to pale when the city was cleaned up, and the black color stopped keeping them safe, camouflaged. But moths, cats, horses and all other animals can't become anything other than what they already are. While slightly altering there bodies with in their own genetic and body type group. The lie is large E evolution, one kind of animal over time can turn into a completely unrelated kind of animal. Like from reptile to mammal, while the facts point to small e evolution, otherwise known as adaptation. An animal staying in it's own kind/genetic group, while slightly changing to survive. But not as big or as dramatic a way as the religion of evolution/lie science would have us would have us believe. Which is completely acceptable biblically, and from a real science perspective. And remember, God is still the one making all of this occur, so He is still the one who gets the credit. God bless everyone, stay safe. Viva Cristo Rey and Ave Maria.

@Skwid-Lives Ай бұрын

Correct. They adapt. Their intelligent like people are. We adapt too. Evilution is from Satan

@josellers1376 Ай бұрын

@@Skwid-Lives True, they aren't that intelligent compared to humans. But they are smart, and God takes care of them. Viva Cristo Rey!

@therick363 Ай бұрын

Science shows evolution happens. Please don’t lie

@josellers1376 Ай бұрын

@@therick363 Same to you, Viva Cristo Rey.

@therick363 Ай бұрын

@@josellers1376 I didn’t lie. It’s a fact evolution happens.

@HannahsCats-zp6rb 6 ай бұрын

Todd Wood? Even though the Liberty University "expert" has little credibility, even has has stated that evolution is true ("There is evidence for evolution, gobs and gobs of it. It is not just speculation or a faith choice or an assumption or a religion. It is a productive framework for lots of biological research, and it has amazing explanatory power.).

@Makeaocbartendagain2 5 ай бұрын

He didn't say it was true. He admitted there was evidence for it. But he also says in one of his books that the evidence "doesn't make evolution true." Which is a true claim. Evolution can explain lots of data without being true.