Criminal Law - Part Two: The Two Essential Elements - Mens Rea and Actus Reus

Lecture Two in a series of eight lectures on Criminal Law. This lecture introduces students to the Two Essential Elements of Criminal Law: Mens Rea and Actus Reus.

[@Nick-1117]

OMG thank you so much. I have learned so much more in this video and the last one then I have in the entire semester in Criminal Law. Seriously you have saved me.

[@tonygovender3805]

very well done, thank you. I'm not a lawyer yet. you inspire me. You are better than most online professor

[@florencewhite7467]

You're better then my online professor in explaining things.

[@maryamraha8482]

Yeahhh u same with me😔too upset

[@destinyizmyname2010]

I have a mid term on criminal intent and this helped me so much. Thanks. Poor imaginary goats.

[@GC-ip6zv]

So clear and easy to understand Thank you so much

[@zambiacriminallawhub194]

Love your Chanel,I'm a first year law student...I would appreciate any advice you have, thanks 💯

[@mossm8304]

This is a super supportive lecturing. Yes I can say that you are better than my school lecturing.

[@angelamaxwell7825]

You saved me a lot of confusion. Thank you!

[@zlo8389]

so glad I found your videos, thank you!!!

[@chasingamurderer]

Thank you for these beautifully, detailed videos. It is very appreciated. :) You did a wonderful job.

[@phillyjilly]

I am done w num 1 and 2 and u really articulate these stories aka lessons well!! U sound just like an actress on Bold and the Beautiful named Flo!!

[@traps4735]

Awesome Lecturer. I am hooked!

[@annierehman4676]

You are so good at explaining!! This really helped. Thanks a mon 🙂

[@TanjimRahman]

So glad that I found your channel

[@Inuyashalover4ever]

I hope you will be able more videos like these for ALL Bar/1L classes -- or at least recruit similarly amazing people to teach us

[@user-ck7vb7ve9r]

This is very helpful! Thank you so much.

[@zoubirbouzer3061]

thanks a lot for your good work, wish you all the best

[@abualisafarov4044]

The best explanation ever

[@asamatteroflaw570]

Thank you for making this video!!!

[@cherrelle40]

Thank you!

[@hyojinlee]

This is another great video :)

[@patiencenyoni2612]

So clear n easy understand thank you so much

[@xxxluvi]

Awesome thank you 🙏

[@theoreticallyspeaking3377]

Thanks so much!

[@MrSaGc]

Love the superhuman punch example 😂

[@brigettelynchscott7416]

Brilliant

[@coco-wv8wz]

Very helpful

[@Harlem55]

With strict liability the state still has to prove the corpus delicti act was knowing or intentional, e.g. Defendant was aware of the act itself.

[@xxxluvi]

Let’s get started!

[@kamarievans9986]

What's the best ways to make things easier with notes I'm 27 wanting to get involved I got in by police one but I didnt get into the department so I'm a pre student

[@damc8415]

Please provide examples of irrefutable presumptions that have been allowed in U.S. criminal cases.

[@mohamedunisakamara361]

Nahh You're really good...

[@xxxluvi]

I liked it

[@kamarievans9986]

I'm truly sorry to bother do you allow tutoring session or is this it on KZbin

[@mohamedunisakamara361]

She really carried criminal law With Jim and a goat😂

[@giddynihilsttv1514]

this is very insightful, i'd love to pick your brain, as i'm studying law. (*using florida as a example* im curious what you think of the mandating of 24 months law school minimal, in order to take the bar exam and if it is in fact partially unconstitutional.) 4 states california and virginia included must conclude such, as there is no mandate of law school to take the exam. shouldn't the tests be restructured versus being "indoctrinated" lol by state run educational academies. it just feels like something that "the people" should have access to, absent of state or government influence. (btw im not even a republican lol) i think a form of wavier at least, should exist. (some of the best computer hackers/artists/professionals are completely self taught)

[@bonestobunnies3444]

If I ever write a book Jim is going to be the main villain

[@3rddimensionmedia950]

In my opinion; For Constructive Intent without a desire to cause the result; the act should never be treated as Specific intent. Specific Constructive intent should have that distinction

[@dannyyarbrough915]

I'm confused isn't this the study of criminology not criminal Law ?

[@mikesmith3899]

The definitions provided for the terms subjective and objective intent seem to be reversed from a lexical perspective.

[@mikesmith3899]

Imputation and projection rather than inference might be more accurate.

[@stepha2642]

Why were the puppies in the backpack?

[@eymharun5263]

Aa

[@joshlcaudill]

Your poor goat!

[@amberkilger84]

Right? I know no animals were harmed in the making of the slideshow, but dang did it hit me right in the feels with the puppies in the backpack.

[@l.a.h837]

Im so madd he killed those puppies

[@bguerrero9491]

EVERYONE THINKS ITS CUTE SHES USING "A TALKING LIKE A CHILD APPROACH " about some goat to explain criminal law which is serious and the people that make those laws are fraud. So it's basically like she's laughing and treating us like we are stupid and can't comprehend facts. or is it because the goat story is not a big crime resource to have anyone draw concern, but to just laugh because your so funny. She is not the only one that tries to dumb down innocent people of their rights. none of them can be trusted. of course this is just my personal opinion ,and not a debate .

[@bestlearners232]

worst