Crises in Chicago | Glenn Loury & Richard Epstein [The Glenn Show]

[@AZRogue]

Nothing as exciting as loading KZbin and seeing a new Glenn Loury video! Glenn! We need our Black Guys of Bloggingheads Coffee mugs and other merch!

[@mellowtron214]

It’s a shame that the BLM cultist types will only even consider a counter narrative if it’s put forth by a non-white person. There are several, more well known white folks out there who’ve been making the same points as Glenn, John, and Coleman, but they are always dismissed as lacking the authority to speak on these topics because of their light skin pigmentation. So, you find some like minded darker skin pigmented people and they seem to have a better shot at getting through that initial barrier. As if only a black person can know certain facts and whites other facts, like knowledge is segregated. So, for that alone, I’m glad we have Glenn out here speaking truth to power.

[@posieglom3215]

@@troyboodie1328 I could not agree more with your thoughts. Glenn, John and Coleman are the truly outstanding voices, and although I've followed him less, I might put Kmele Foster in that group. It's in the complexity of their thoughts and ability to break it all down, and the genuine humanity that feeds their conversations (and an absence of pretentiousness). That they are enormously entertaining, just as personalities, is a bonus!

[@athenassigil5820]

I want a Glenn mug!

[@MrGOTAMA420]

Tooo short! toooshort! thank you glen ! another great episode of the glen show!

[@Floccini]

My favorite interviewer and one of my favorite interviewees.

[@EdgarHernandez-uj2mx]

I could listen to Professors Loury and Epstein all day.

[@professorgentzel]

Great interview. Glenn is wise and measured with great ideas. Richard is one of those few people who are so brilliant it's startling.

[@c6d6c6]

amazed at his level of understanding of scientific and medical complexity, on top of being a top legal scholar. really terrifying level if intelligence

[@rfphill]

Damn... i could listen to these two guys break down the chaos anytime. Very good hour, lads.

[@valencia4215]

Rarely have I seen anyone hold Glenn's attention like Richard Epstein. Interesting, informative, dynamic episode.

[@wade5941]

I so appreciate Glenn Loury.

[@hodge_feather]

Time just flew by with this one, looking forward to the next one

[@karenfornwalt9929]

This was a great conversation. I'd love to hear Glen Loury and Richard Epstein have more of these.

[@aaronfrank9649]

What a great discussion. Thank you Sirs.

[@turboretard9555]

Wow so stoked for this conversation! Longtime listener to Richard's podcast here. Looking good Richard!

[@suzimonkey345]

I wish this had been MUCH LONGER!!

[@nathanieljacobs3151]

Glenn Loury and Richard Epstein!!!! This should be a regular thing ))

[@earthangel2524]

Yes!

[@paul_bellini]

Oh man what a good duo

[@BMerker]

Brilliant! What a pleasure to watch this cascade of well-informed commentary of several difficult topics! Richard Epstein must be some kind of genius, and I thank Glenn Loury for bringing him on.

[@Highwayman589]

Big get. Epstein is a fascinating thinking. Would love to see him again.

[@jeffpullen5302]

Can you believe he's the same age as Biden?!?!?

[@earthangel2524]

Encore! Two virtuosos!

[@christianleblanc2842]

He was fun.

[@saintlybeginnings]

Need longer or more of these talks!! I know you guys are busy, but, think if it as the world as your classroom!! Need so much more of this!

[@najaradio645]

Thank you, Mr. Loury. I respect your attention to detail.

[@microcolonel]

What a gentle soul.

[@sunnycareboo8924]

hell yeah so excited for this. Love hearing y'all, hope everything is alright!

[@tteot1wph]

I always want these conversations to go on longer

[@adamnoble1689]

Good to hear you today Glenn

[@BradleyL-de6iq]

Great Show & Interview!!!

[@ajg1791]

Glenn, thank you very much for having Professor Epstein as a guest. He may be the greatest legal scholar ever, and a genuinely kind and generous man with brilliant insights.

[@regi8838]

Gentlemen, a majority of our citizens put on a mask, and social distance for “essentials” like the grocery store, pet store, hardware store, etc. Casting a vote for the candidates of choice IS essential! Voting can be managed with the “essential” precautions. The only way we can vote with confidence in the results is using a process already proven reliable. In person, with ID must be considered essential. For those high risk, allow them an option to “APPLY” to vote otherwise as is done with absentee. Mail-in voting is an unreliable process that’s vulnerable to fraudulent actors. Attempting to establish and manage the mail-in voting process will certainly be costly, AND no matter the results, they will be questioned/doubted. It’s a bad plan.

[@ne4azcats]

Another fantastic conversation. Thank you from SWFL!

[@judah2523]

All law students know of him, at least they should

[@ajg1791]

@Erika Johnson You need to start reading his books and law review articles. You've heard of Judge Posner, I'm sure. Epstein is better.

[@turboretard9555]

​@Erika Johnson He's highly influential, but it's possible that your professors choose not to cover his work for political reasons. Biden thumped his takings book during the Clarence Thomas confirmation hearings and said 'if this is what you believe, you're not qualified to sit on the Supreme Court' lmao. Unfortunately he was soon overshadowed by lewder news.

[@michael.5360]

People who protest come to protest peacefully. People who come to watch a stand-up comedian and enjoy the show, but there is always a heckler in the audience.

[@MrBearZeus]

Two of my favorites talking it out - heaven! May I have another, please?

[@DaveWard-xc7vd]

A tennant's property rights extend no further than the conditions of their lease agreement. They should vacate the property when their lease is up. The property owner owes them nothing in excess of the lease agreement.

[@daraharvey4519]

Glenn, you’re my favorite. I love to listen to you talk, and watch you when you’re listening to other people talk. Promise I’m not a creepy stalker. Just a big fan 😂

[@r.c.7762]

Mr Epstein should should be on every news program, and you tube blog!

[@ibanezdudeck]

Wow, great discussion. Lots of good topics.

[@FocusProj]

Love your talks Glenn 💝

[@MindandQiR1]

Excellent video! Wow!

[@thevoxdeus]

States are only required to report where someone died, not where they came from. Thus if NY's governor wants to hide nursing home deaths he needn't do anything other than tell the state not to ask the question, or to hide the answers if they already asked.

[@saintlybeginnings]

Yes, please bring him back!! Would love to hear about the Obama Center!!

[@prybarknives]

Great show.

[@horsemen54]

What a talk!!!

[@ret1con]

Under current law, deadly force is not allowed for private citizens to use to protect property. Should this change?

[@ret1con]

markcoveryourassets www.usacarry.com/lethal-force-defense-property/

[@magisterparsons]

I think this interview has the fewest number of Prof. Loury interruptions of any I've seen thus far.

[@gabrielenriquemartinez]

You just have to let Prof. Epstein gooooo!!!!

[@markbrownner6565]

mail in voting doesn't 'favor' democrats it just gives certain communities better access and removes the ongoing efforts of republicans to suppress those votes....

[@MsChitterchat]

Why doesn’t the city just develop some these sites? Then rehouse some of the people in these communities in the new developments with below market rent. And market sale the rest of the housing to pay for it. That’s what’s happening in the UK. It’s a good model and doesn’t rely on private developers who aren’t interested in building social housing.

[@lizp5004]

Does anyone else sometimes have trouble deciphering Glenn's 'devil's advocate' retort or his own response. When his retort is a lil heated/passionate &displays his signature "tell" - a sharp jump in volume for words of emphasis - it's easy to distinguish; but, had I not previously heard him argue _against_ the notion that 'Trumps a racist', I would've assumed that was genuine.🤦🏼‍♀️ lol

[@thomassimmons1950]

This is very smart discourse. But isn't the elephant in the room being ignored? The hemorraging middle class fore and aft on every level.

[@mspoints4fre123]

When's the next McWhorter convo?

[@IkeOg]

Nice. First!!! Now let's listen.

[@aaronhanna4496]

Glen, your great strength as a podcast host is rigorously interrogating even thinkers who generally agree with you. In this episode, you neglected your gifts. Maybe RE talks too assertively and voluminously for you to organize your thoughts / criticisms, but you're better than this!

[@just_another32]

@43:54 We can NEVER forget the Iowa thing!

[@ManInTheBigHat]

I was polled yesterday. I lied to the pollster.

[@palmerj213]

Same...I've been doing that since 2008. It finally worked in 2016.

[@just_another32]

This guy speaks very fast... I thought I spoke English... as my first language... but even I am having trouble keeping up!

[@SevenRiderAirForce]

More people should know about, listen to, and read books by Richard Epstein.

[@earthangel2524]

The HCQ is the ionophore and the Zinc the therapeutic. Robert Epstein correction, please.

[@palmerj213]

Why did you stop the conversation when it was getting good! Expert vs Customary knowledge... Get on it Glenn!

[@ret1con]

Zinc is highly regulated - so it’s unclear whether a person can “bulk up” if you will on Zinc beyond the body’s regulation limit. That limit may or may not be sufficient to prevent viral replication sufficient to avoid the disease or its deleterious effects

[@earthangel2524]

You can buy Zinc supplements in the grocery store. I do. 23 mg lozenges.

[@panushjo]

Damn. I wonder what Richard's iq is?

[@ajg1791]

I was in the same room as him at a conference and realized right away he was a genius and smartest man I've ever shared company with.

[@kimwiser445]

I’ve listened to Epstein’s podcasts but it’s nice to see him during a interview.

[@earthangel2524]

kim wiser. Where do you find his podcasts?

[@kimwiser445]

Earth Angel The Libertarian and Law Talk

[@earthangel2524]

@@kimwiser445 Thank you. I am an Epstein fan from his KZbin lectures. Unfortunately, I have never seen him challenged. People are so stunned by his intellectual virtuosity and friendliness they don't say much. This is the first time I have been able to tell he was talking in a fact-free (HCQ/masks)zone. I would love to see these two go at it for 3 hours or so.

[@kimwiser445]

Earth Angel I agree, it’s to bad he’s not on the Supreme Court.

[@dietervolke7811]

CORBETTREPORT

[@williamerschultz]

More Epstein please.

[@jakmere]

6:45 what does "infected by government action..." mean? Epstein, I have found, has always been terribly difficult to understand.

[@Off-Brand_Devin]

Glenn asks a question to clarify that Epstein is referring to seniors with Covid being placed back into their nursing homes and infecting others at the directive of state leadership (e.g., New York).

[@jakmere]

7:00 wait a second! Is he saying that someone could have died in April, but they would report the death as a covid related death in May as if the death happened IN May? Is he saying that the news reports daily death tolls that actually include deaths that have happened at least a month before? And they do this due to a reclassification of the cause of a death that happened a month before? If that's what he is saying, I would imagine I'd be impossible for anyone to get any evidence of that. How could he know that?

[@jakmere]

@@yamishogun6501 See, this is way Epstein I saw Epstein is an elusive intellect. There is the total number of cases, the total number of deaths and then the infection rate and the daily death rate. Someone could have died in April and the hospitals didn't report the death until may (which is likely because, in FL, hospitals were being told to withhold data). A death reported later didn't add to the daily death toll; it added to the total number of deaths. If a bunch of hospitals didn't report - lets say - 2000 covid related deaths that happend in April until month later in May, there will appear to be a "spike" in th total cases, but it's not being reported as part of the daily death toll. If there were 150k deaths the day before and the daily toll was 1000, how do you get to 153k? Late reported covid deaths. All of that was lost in how Epstein talks about the subject.

[@jakmere]

@@yamishogun6501 corrected it.

[@jsnadrian]

richarddddddd -- ngl, he's had some horrible takes through covid, but 'simple rules for a complex world' is as close to a bible as i have

[@Olsonic]

Your show is great Glenn; although, this episode featuring a law professor giving his best impression of an epidemiologist and a public health expert isn't one of the better ones. When it comes to infectious disease, I think it's better for us if we stay in our lanes and give those who are more trained and more experienced (Like Dr. Fauci) the space to lead.

[@wasdwasdedsf]

lol what? listen to echochamber hacks severely willfully or not being monstrously polirtically biased and lying?

[@ajg1791]

How many infectious disease experts understand trade-offs, marginal cost, unintended consequences, economics, which are all needed areas of expertise when facing an epidemic?. Not simply, if it saves one life, the hell with the economic destruction, 40 million unemployed, and that lives that go with it.

[@wasdwasdedsf]

@@ajg1791 its so f-ng mad how we got here... shut down everything and blame trump, be the ones in favour of as muc hlockdowns as possible, then whine at trump for ruining the economy... every single thing is politicised by these people, and in such an incompetent, transparent way

[@philipmoss4027]

That experts should be believed when stating facts in their field is a fair assumption. But the discussion of those facts--their relevance, priority, and fit within schemes of public policy--should be on as broad a basis as possible. If the epidemiologists and frontline doctors were holding a wide ranging public DEBATE, touching base with economists, lawyers, historians, etc. where those subjects come into play, I would tune into that before this interview. But that's not happening. So, we're reduced to sampling from the jungle of the new media at random and forming judgments with whatever discipline we ourselves possess. Given that situation, I'm glad to have someone like Richard Epstein to listen to.

[@williams.1980]

More privatization does not work but for the capitalists and investors. Neoliberal privatization is now causing destruction from uncontrollable bubblenomics. More privatization gives you opioid epidemics and economy sucking wealth transfer. You can argue that "the free market, laissez faire, unregulated privatization financial parasitism just hasn't been done correctly, but this time we're gonna get it right". There's been too many next times. .....And it appears that big multinational corporations, banks, insurers, etc. are being protected more and more by the ever so huge and expanding mother's embrace of the corporate national nanny state. So socialism for Wall st and global corps but capitalism and free market for working class and those priced out of homes? That would be a solution if unnecessary austerity is your goal, hopefully we can do better than that. .........And one thing I find interesting about this KZbin is that it doesn't recognize the word neoliberal or opioid? I'm sure it recognizes them, but doesn't like me using them?

[@williams.1980]

@@teriekwilliams2828 I guess we both have suggestions and opinions.

[@chrisbennett76]

@@williams.1980 What a stupid and fatuous reply.

[@williams.1980]

Your resentment talk sounds like projection. I don't mind billionaires, only parasitic billionaires. Definitely don't like Bill Gates. I'm not saying you are wrong about the inflation and the politics, but like I said, socialism, or Keynsianism (printing trillions on a deficit of trillions?) for multi nationals and Wall St banks is not good for the real economy. It might be wrong calling that socialism. Socialism usually has the wider public in mind. But I would argue that all the currency printing is not going into the real economy. I would say it is being pocketed into private pockets, neoliberal pockets, and pumping up the stock market, something unrelated to the real economy. I exaggerate, the stock market is related to the real economy but is becoming more and more detached. The fraudulent asset inflation can be used to continue asset inflation, moved into safer havens or used to strengthen monopolies. I think most Americans like socialism, for instance public schools, medicare ,medicaid, fire dept., police dept.. I can get emotional and a little excited when I hear an argument for more free market ideology. The acknowledgment of endless currency printing for investment banks, insolvent corporations and inflating asset prices makes blatantly clear that our market is not a free market. I think we have a consumer credit economy that is kept artificially functioning from free or nearly free money for creditors. I'm all for earning from the markets, but earning from the market doesn't mean I expect everybody to be stock investors or real estate investors. ........But the initial subject that I was responding to was about public housing. I think we have been showing more and more favor and assistance to private development and investment to the neglect of reasonable public housing options. Even the "public housing" market has become privatized essentially. I understand that some are adamantly opposed to realistically affordable public housing as if it is an assault to their person, but I think it makes sense depending on one' s values. I say depending on one's values because for a "privatized" for profit system to work, their needs to be people being priced out of the market for maximum profit yield. ..... So I am someone that sees capitalism as workable, but not any kind of capitalism. I don't think I'm alone. Unrestrained capitalism in public housing and healthcare is something that is not ideal in my view. And definitely not ideal in elder care and nursing homes during the covid pandemic. .........As I think about unrestrained capitalism I am reminded of the Bloggingheads video where Robert Wright is talking with a foreign policy scholar at the Cato Institute that took a very cold view of the exercise of power. She basically looked at foreign policy and the strategies that can be employed in the pursuit of "national interests", basically oil, economic advantage, hegemony etc. as simply an issue of relative power. In other words if you can ignore, manipulate or co-opt human rights organizations, then anything goes. Since the US has the biggest military by far, cyber intelligence, covert ops, not to mention very active and insidious propaganda operations and top down state censored mainstream media that is in part owned by defense industry contractors, in the world of foreign affairs and national defense, anything goes. .........In unavoidable war that should be the case, but what about avoidable war? What about unprovoked invasions and state terrorism through proxies? Syria? Yemen? Venezuela? Bolivia? Libya? ..... I digress. I think like anything, just as you can be too soft, you can also be too aggressive and hostile. .........Then there are the sanctions. Remember Madeleine Albright on 60 Minutes: "500,000 dead Iraqi children is worth it". I know it was a long time ago but the US foreign policy has not changed. There was no threat against the US, it was just something the US could get away with in the pursuit of oil, economic advantage, hegemony etc. ...... .............My excuse for going on an anti-imperialist rant is to point out that the the US foreign policy has a lot in common with domestic economic policy in practice and the values expressed in the propaganda. Of course you can find a perfectly "logical" State Dept. approved economic theory to justify all of it and more in the Wall St Journal, CNBC, Bloomberg and countless others.

[@blameitonben]

LIfe-year adjust the deaths and the loss of potential life is comparable to bad flu years. Other key issue is older peopel are always more vulnerable based on the body *except* for prior immunity. They have no prior immunity to this hence the deadliness of disease to them.

[@ShadowLord2396]

That and the fact that while we now know much more about the virus than we did at the beginning of the year, we still know next to nothing. It seems it may be able to cross species barriers, into pets. Who knows if it can infect livestock. We really don't know how quickly it will evolve. A one-time injection like for polio? Enough to require a yearly injection like influenzaSo quickly like a cold that shots would be worthless? We really don't know how long immunity will last after recovering from it, much less how long any potential immunization injection would last.

[@mellowmindset4851]

I am from Chicago I will observe this video with great interest and come up with a more well-iterated thought form then what I am about to udder For now such wells have been sucked dry I sense intense mysticism The likes of which we have never seen At least I have become aware of the starving artist And have become like them To understand what all the buzz is about The hyper level projection here Is beyond the universities It is essentially Weaponized literature This is the best way to describe the white noise Which is actually black noise Which is actually tactical noise Which is not Let's say.. It's not bad perse As it has its place in our canon The issue is simple It has become the apriori perspective with many youth It has become the matrix in which the lense of perception is gauged The entire mode of thought Is in fact not thought The fact Is in fact not a fact at all The bias is in fact not a bias But is never reflected on Not out of a lack of morality But out of a lack of capacity And in incremental steps This Thought virus To take from dr. Phil This Parasitic mind To take from saad This toxosplosmosis To take from that one guy This perverse cat To take from the abrahamic religions This sphinx To take from the post modern types And spiritualists This dare I say Machine Is enough to want any slave to utterly deconstruct it completely Yet It is nothing more Than a bad dream A nightmare as it were That feeds on itself Had the political and journalistic field developed a genuine care for the working class They would have attempted true reconciliation with the adversary Down to the final questions and the most unforgivingly difficult conversations This is what's needed amongst the "teachers" and in particular the administrators Unfortunately This seems like a passionate demand of sorts Because it is a passionate demand of sorts But it's also not I wish not to yell and trigger any latent submissive neurosis I send you all hugs However Grow up too yee animus driven women Yee entanglement magi I see yee Yee killed your own men And turned them to blind beasts And now that the animal realizes hes in his cage You double down What on earth do you expect a man to do In such an instance Than to punch a woman Except In the final analysis A real man would find a way To reveal rhe whole story Without it coming down to physical altercation But what now?? Physical modification???? Then men shall lose once more So man must transcend And reclaim by force However this is also nothing but blind hatred and justified motivations for revenge This must be healed Through trust However It is more complicated than a simple generalization For instance How do I tell my immigrant mother Of Cam bridge Or ox Ford How do I stop her nightmares Her tragedy And the black hole sun she is entangled in The more I do so The more I cough And this ofcourse Demands Unity But if unity is Blm Marxism Or maoism Then I will continue to be A Mad Poet A New Blake I will call out the Drakes The Kanyes The Billies While I search with my eagle eyes For their masters This is my study of psychology The natural extension of the emergence of moral character And I with 100% earnest With no ass kissing Still believe You both are braver than I for being in public I hide still I am in a basement you see The noise is too loud And I'm compromised with too much hate In fact it fuels me So it's best I stay in the realm of letters of sorts

[@overtonwindowshopper]

Wow Epstein is really talking out of his ass about the pandemic. Stick to economics, professor

[@overtonwindowshopper]

“MASK WEARERS ARE “DRAMATICALLY LESS LIKELY” TO GET A SEVERE CASE OF COVID-19” www.inverse.com/mind-body/masks-breathing-in-less-coronavirus-means-you-get-less-sick/amp

[@SFDestiny]

Am I sluggish or is Richard Epstein talking very quickly?

[@markbrownner6565]

smart guy good info but does he need to move his head in & out & in & out like a kid....

[@Djynni]

Someone who is not a medical professional is saying that he avoids going to anywhere that will force him to wear a mask. Apparently he doesn't want to wear a mask but doesn't say why. Doing something so simple may help so why not do it? I stopped watching.

[@ret1con]

Sorry, you guys are not scientists - stick to law and politics and economics

[@earthangel2524]

Epstein is an expert on Pharma law. Weird how he mixes and matches valid data with fantasy. I would love to see him on a panel with working virologists.

[@wasdwasdedsf]

academia arent scientists. when you virtually cannot find a single academia conservative or a single one whos allowed to openlystate how absurd the cult propaganda nature of the hoax that is global warming is, you know how unsalvagably poison the whole field is

[@ret1con]

wasdwasdedsf climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/

[@wasdwasdedsf]

@@ret1con you linked to clowns making up data. 2.you linked to basic data of temperature changes. both sides of the climate debate uses temperature data. that slide has absolutely nothing to do with anything. 3.as it points out, theres been a 1 degree change over a hundred years, with a very small percent being thanks to co2. and you want to claim were on the verge of a point of no return, a runaway effect. that somehow, for some reason, there will be an enourmous shift in the trend, and we will have catastrophic increases of 2, 3, whatever degrees in 30 years, based on delicately manually calibrating models to fit t heir narrative, based on models no actual computer modeller respects.. based on a modelling area, climate modelling, infinitely more difficult than current computers can even attempt todo realistically. and they want to convince us that these sudden changes will happen at a point n time where CO2 and temperature levels are at the low end of the historical ranges, plants being recently scarily close to starvation levels, still being way too low for optimal health. usually runaway effects tend to happen at th etop and above a longterm range of different temperatures/whatever the topic in question, not at the bottom range of both temperature and CO2 levels. normally, as in ases with religion, science requests extreme claims to require extreme evidence (whatever the quote was again). Havent see na whole lot of that in climate science.

[@ret1con]

wasdwasdedsf ad hominem attacks mean nothing - please provide peer reviewed research supporting your position

[@hermitthefrog8951]

Riots have *NOTHING* to do with George Floyd [FF].

[@consmusicteach]

Is Richard on a boat in heavy weather? Getting seasick him moving back and forward🤣

[@SlyNine]

I almost feel bad, the first thing I wondered is if he was related to the other Epstein.

[@ajg1791]

There are millions of Epsteins. The name comparison thing is childish.

[@ajg1791]

@Chad Michael First thing I think of when I hear Chad is Chaz, Chop, and antifa. How's that?

[@SlyNine]

@@ajg1791 okay boomer

[@sendittoherlihy]

Epstein reeks of dishonesty

[@iamthebearjew96]

Gotta be honest he lost me when he said he agrees with pulling out of the Paris accords. It's so short-sighted it was hard to take him seriously after.

[@hermitthefrog8951]

Paris accords are a globalist attempt to further loot the US. Trump was right to withdraw.

[@davidward8355]

What's so great about UN globalism? Paris accord countries seem to be harming their own citizens, although clearly we can differ in good faith as to whether the harms inflicted are deliberate or merely stupid...

[@hermitthefrog8951]

@@davidward8355 - deliberate

[@iamthebearjew96]

@@davidward8355 Umm how about trying to prevent cascading climate collapse? Everything we have depends on having a stable environment with which to function as a society, and we are destroying it so old people can stay rich while young people like me are staring collapse in the face right now.

[@hermitthefrog8951]

@@iamthebearjew96 - there is no cascading climate collapse, research the real data. Even UN IPCC says so. Having said that, we DO need to do more for clean air and water (much progress already made in developed world) and especially oceans (long way to go).

[@doobeedoo2]

This is beneath you Glenn

[@andrewhall2893]

Glenn Lowry has TDS at about 42:30. Very sad.

[@20573867291823047859]

If you've heard enough Glenn, it's safe to say he was playing devil's advocate rather than expressing his beliefs. Also hinted by his tone of voice.

[@StingBear]

@@Lebbz Yes, if you've seen other episodes it's very obvious he was being sarcastic. But I realize it might not be so obvious for new viewers.

[@MaestroFriedrich]

shave . uuggggh