Crumple zone | Safe cars are built weaker

[@mr_robot_tech]

In India pple still believes that stronger the car less impact will be there during collision and more safe will be the passengers. This video is eye opener for them.

[@FBCDC]

I was explaining to some people why cars are designed to crumble. And it's for their safety. Right after my explanation, they went back to complaining about how cars nowadays are so easy to crumble. I was like "WTF? Did you even listen to me?"

[@ProTutor100]

They will close there eyes

[@adityaachmal3770]

I've had a discussion with people dumb enough, that they refused to believe it and insisted that crumple zone is a marketing fraud

[@koti0009]

Do you mean to say Maruti cars are safer cars right?

[@mr_robot_tech]

@@koti0009 I don't know about any one company but as per automobile engineering concept of crumple zone is to intentionally make front to absorb force maximizing damage during frontal impact. If u know any such brands of cars which goes with minimum damages after frontal impact then note there is high possibility that they haven't been engineered in a right way it should be.

[@ninjaofalltrades4293]

Someone tell that to Elon Musk with his crumple-zone-free cyber truck. Craziness. Thanks for the video.

[@deepakthuruthy]

I have maruti zuzuki Baleno and my relatives husband have Volks Wagon Vento he always teasing me by showing Maruti Cars Crumple zone accidents and loud mouth abouth his vento( always ABS complaint and too much Service charge😅) and i explain this always to him and he hear it and later again telling his safety story again and again so much relatable thanks for video😂

[@arjunkumartudu8027]

informative video about automobile. why crumpling of vehicles is necessary so to impact less g-force to seater.

[@combine8269]

Very educational video. I enjoyed.

[@hutki_shira]

Is this not obvious do people not understand energy tarnsfers and literally one of fundementals rules of science energy cannot be created nor destroyed (there are a few examples of matter being destroyed but that's rare)

[@cembora4849]

and there is a cybertruck which is kind a brick lol.

[@emyriandragon2277]

The 2 schools of thought 1)Make it safe by making break in a predictable fashion. 2)B R I C K

[@FistsOfFury_]

the fact this has so little views is crazy. thank you brother

[@solcutta3661]

Nice Mr Indian sir... Great explanation and work... Thankyou from a uk. Man

[@lukeyisaverage]

Very well explained! great video.

[@tarakaramaprasadpampana8251]

Could you please give me the bread video on crumple zone construction for the absorbing the sudden colusion

[@zima4502]

hey, is the script for this video available? id love to use it as a reference for a school project :)

[@crossover37]

Great explanation! Thank you!

[@anamiguel2603]

Soo what is safer, absorbing the gshock.. or getting crushed by the metals (and also absorbing some of the g-shock?)

[@prashantparmar820]

Very good video

[@prakashtp7590]

Can you please let me know the calculation for 17G when a car runs at 60 kmph and there is no crumble zone. If you can share some links it would be ok.

[@EliteRock]

Although crumple zones spread the duration of impact and hence peak G, they are 'once only', sacrificial structures. In a multi-vehicle pile-up (hence multiple impacts), or where the vehicle rolls or 'endo's' several times, the overall strength of the chassis comes into play - that's when you might well be better off in a 1985 Saab 900 than a modern car.

[@marlonallansupetran7120]

It's a moot point in multiple impacts as the passengers have already sustained fatal injuries during the first one if the car didn't have crumple zones.

[@altafkalam2716]

That's a very boomer comment to make. Most accidents are not muticare pileups. Most of them are one on one head to head crashes. Why would you opt for a 1990s death machine than a car designed to keep you safe?

[@EliteRock]

@@altafkalam2716 BTW, that's a very millennial ignoramus comment to make..

[@altafkalam2716]

@@EliteRock Okay Boomer

[@ry9756]

Yeah, I also came across a crash scene where someone hit a moose dead on travelling at around 110km/h with a front bull guard on their truck, and they were able to walk away without a scratch. In northern Ontario where I live it’s well known that having a front grill or bull guard will save your life in those events. We always have to be cautious about head on collisions on certain highways. I’ve seen some nasty wrecks in my life. I’m just confused now, after watching this video.

[@someone2084]

Very informative

[@lukeyisaverage]

Agreed

[@alaahisham7228]

Great!!! How do u make these animated vidoes? Wish u answer ma question 😊

[@UntangleClub]

With the help of animating software Ae. Thanks for your comment. 😊

[@Anush_Sivakumar]

@@UntangleClub lmfao which animation software XD

[@Sunny-zh6go]

​@@Anush_Sivakumarae is after effects

[@sigalali8571]

sorry for asking this stupid question What does the G stand for?

[@UntangleClub]

G is unit of acceleration. 1g force or 1 gravitational force is approx. equivalent to 9.81 m/s^2

[@TheKeshav92]

G force= 1 when something is at rest. G=1+ , when something accelerates or deccelerate against gravity. G=1- , when something accelerates or deccelerate towards or same direction of gravity.

[@jacobm8427]

Btw when using a and an you should try to use a before words starting with a consonant like L k or t and use an before words staring with vowels like a i or e :)

[@bbednorz319]

Jacob M no such word as an.

[@solcutta3661]

I'm english and appreciated this comment.. Great work there JACOB M... thankyou from a lifelong writer.

[@solcutta3661]

@@bbednorz319 what are u on about u fool.. Haha.

[@solcutta3661]

Although I'm sure in principle this doesn't hold up on every occasion.. Tho seems pretty good I must say. Nice simple example of a much harder implementation.

[@SreejithS-mw5um]

What you mean by G force

[@bernadusarswendo1046]

Vehicle Pulse Index, weaker chassis contribute to low VPI.. means good.

[@Reggantal]

Someone should show this to Elon musk

[@biratz]

What's a pom?

[@Mabeylater293]

What about rear crashes?

[@mahiru20ten]

Crumple zones also exists on the rear end.

[@Mabeylater293]

@@mahiru20ten you’re confusing that with your backbone

[@mahiru20ten]

@@Mabeylater293 Didn't you see that there are crumple zones on your car's rear bumper?

[@TheKeshav92]

They give only a rear crash long cross members because there are less cases of death of occupant by hitting rear side.

[@MAlif-qg5sn]

You dont need crumple zone when you have fia spec harness and seat to absorb that much g's

[@hutki_shira]

yes you do I don't think you understand the basic rules of science energy cannot be created nor destroyed the front of the car absorbs alot of the G's and that's still extremely dangerous because you know car crash = bad

[@Contrarian01]

Thanks ❤️

[@silvershadespradeep1161]

thank you buddy

[@lakshminathvpai1397]

quality video 👍

[@shyamkanojiya508]

thanks sir

[@steevo456]

is charlie here

[@charliescowcroft3765]

whatta do boota crew

[@ashtonrufc698]

good video

[@georges2773]

and he even made the number 69, nice…

[@beaniekei8691]

Has anybody ever been injured or died inside a car after a crash while the car is perfectly fine or minimal damage? Until I find that proof, crumple zone appears to me as an excuse to go cheap on cars.

[@beaniekei8691]

@David AZ aside from movies or your imagination, where did that happen? Link please 😉

[@beaniekei8691]

@David AZ your examples can be avoided with seatbelts and airbags. I highly doubt not hitting the dashboard or windshield can kill you in head-on collisions. Side hits and cars rolling are a different matter. My dad got into a car accident while a little drunk. He had an older, sturdier car. The other car had this crapple zone. His car got minor damages while the other, you already know. I don't know the physics of 2 cars colliding at around 50kph or the Gs involved in it, but my dad came out just fine. Nothing wrong with him according to the doctor. He said the only concussion he got was when he saw the repair bill for the other car since it was fault. Maybe he's got more resistance than a trained fighter pilot? Lol

[@Kyle-kc8cw]

First, let's go with "theory" (I say "theory" because it's actually pretty solid science at this point). Yes, crumple zones are definitely a factor of maintaining affordability. But it also makes cars generally a lot safer. You're assuming the entire car is a crumple zone, which is wrong. There's a reason it's called a crumple ZONE. It's a sacrificial part of a vehicle. The cabin of the car itself remains rigid and durable (and better) to this day. The engine bay compartment for example will get absolutely obliterated as it absorbs as much of the impact force it can, while the cabin is strengthened to maintain its structural integrity. As opposed to what you want, which is a strong engine compartment which may or may not smash INTO the cabin if it is too rigid. There's a few car crash tests that demonstrates this combination of crumple zone and strong cabin at work directly against "stronger, older cars". To put simply, crumple zones allow the occupants to decelerate as gradual as possible while the cabin protects them from actually being smashed. Without being the kinetic energy being absorbed and distributed, occupants will get mushed despite the car surviving intact. Ever heard of an EOD suit? It works on similar grounds. Now onto an example that you are asking for. One, yeah you can just go ahead and search the test video of an older car and newer car crashing head on. But my dad has been involved in an accident that pitched a new car against an older one. And it's the perfect example I use till this day. Because car size and type matters... say if an 1970 4x4 smashes into a cute little 2020 hatch, the results will be pretty obvious. So the accident my dad had, was a 2019 Corolla against a 7th generation Corolla. it was a head-on collision (the other fellow was driving in a one way street going against traffic, my dad also made a mistake by turning into the street without slowing down assuming it should be clear as it was early morning, a good ol' combo of blind spots, stupidity, and relatively high speeds...boom). So no one was seriously injured from this and both cars were pretty much dead. The resulting differences being. My dad wash shaken up but not a scratch. The other guy had a good headache and a broken arm (nothing serious though). It was very clear why. The cabin of the 2019 Corolla was totally fine. Not a crack on the windshield and no bends on the A-pillar. Airbags all deployed as they should. The 7th generation Corolla didn't do very well. Firstly the lack of airbags. Furthermore, the dashboard was damaged and the driver side pillars almost fully collapsed. Oh ya...crumple zones also work to the benefit of the object it collided with. So yes, naturally the newer car's crumple zone would have also cushioned your father's impact.

[@ceoatcrystalsoft4942]

@@beaniekei8691 brain dead comment

[@mrmahamadsyazwan8040]

Nice video

[@damnit5618]

why is the number 69😂😂

[@autofactory6061]

Hey sir I need u favour 🙋🏻‍♂️

[@UntangleClub]

Yes sir.

[@autofactory6061]

@@UntangleClub I am going to start another KZbin channel i need a partner would you like to collab with me because I have already one channel which is #Road Riders but basically I want to go on technical base so I need a partner who has knowledge of that sir

[@srajangupta836]

why car no is 69 ? :-p

[@markhansen4935]

funni number lmfao

[@ilpenny1011]

nice

[@annie1-j9j]

omg tysm

[@faizahmed9427]

But the number 69 though

[@bendertimothy332]

69 really? thanks for ruining your video for use in school......grrr

[@filmgvc4115]

And our old car is the safest. No car can crash it :) . Nor even bulldozers. It's more stiffer than any. It barely move after it wake up all around And no one can just steal it

[@averageboi5195]

sure if it crashes it wont as badly crumpled, but the absorption has to go somewhere which the rest then goes to the passengers.

[@정치병자조지는분자]

@is no but why would you do that

[@ceoatcrystalsoft4942]

@@정치병자조지는분자 ask criminals

[@abhishekchatraband9748]

Buy tata and mahindra