"Unintentionally tested during a test." Well, test failed successfully I guess.
@barryphillips73274 жыл бұрын
At least it was still on the ground, not in mid air.
@wrightmf4 жыл бұрын
those two sentences are both confusing and makes sense.
@fiveninecummins77684 жыл бұрын
"Sir, we successfully f#cked up, but it wasn't a f#ck up..Well, it was, but it was a success!" Lol
@PassiveSmoking4 жыл бұрын
@@barryphillips7327 I've heard it described as a "catastrophic success"
@qwertyeet4 жыл бұрын
Lol
@AnonymousFreakYT4 жыл бұрын
"Because the Dragon 2 lands in the sea, it can't be reused for manned flights again..." NASA is allowing SpaceX to reuse the capsule for crewed flights! While "Crew 1" launching early next month will be a new-construction Dragon 2, the "Crew 2" mission launching next Spring will reuse "Endeavour" from the Demo-2 Bob & Doug mission.
@fcgHenden4 жыл бұрын
Really? Wonder what kind of refurb that needs with seawater being corrosive and such.
@maxwellquebec86754 жыл бұрын
@@fcgHenden Pretty much an entire new exterior, and thrusters exposed to salt water have to be replaced. The more sophisticated thrusters are protected so they can be reused.
@morourke25614 жыл бұрын
I was sure I heard that reported as well, fair play, maybe he needs a bigger research team ☺️
@randycampbell63074 жыл бұрын
Salt water isn't that bad folks, in fact NASA successfully tested and proved dunking spacecraft and parts into the water wasn't a big a deal as claimed so often. They don't do it because for the most part "re-use" wasn't a thing so the effort wasn't seen as cost-effective given how most space programs were run. On the other hand EARLY space programs were more heavily aimed at various types of re-use so the concepts actually got tested more even if they were never used. Early Saturn-1 testing was originally aimed at recovering the first stage for post-flight examination and possible re-use with the H1 engines subjected to extensive dunk/soak/re-furbish testing which pinned a price of about 5% of the original engine costs to refurbishment and reuse of an engine even with days of exposure to salt-water, minimum cleaning, (spray down with fresh water) and then stored for two weeks before refurbishment. Similarly the Air Force extensively studied recovery and reuse of the Gemini capsule for the MOL program and found that while some design changes were needed to make the process easier the Gemini could be refurbished and reflown for a vastly lower cost than a new capsule. The reason NASA is allowing SpaceX to reuse the Dragon II capsules is because they now have an example of how much effect and effort will be needed and what the end quality of a refurbished Dragon will be. It should probably be clear the Dragon is more damaged by flight and reentry than by landing in the water and that is where the majority of 'refurbishment' comes from.
@JonathanMiller14 жыл бұрын
I read that as well. Also, fun fact: Bob’s wife will be flying on the Crew-2 mission!
@muhithossain73124 жыл бұрын
That little background on your childhood was very wholesome, not gonna lie. Great video!
@CuriousDroid4 жыл бұрын
Yea, a little stroll down memory lane, happy days :-)
@567raman4 жыл бұрын
Not to mention that lush hairdo.
@Allan_aka_RocKITEman6 ай бұрын
@@CuriousDroid>>> FWIW: In regards to your age, which you reference in the video, I was born in 1961. *_"Seems a thousand centuries ago."_* - APOCALYPSE NOW [1979]
@maurice98054 жыл бұрын
Best sponsored in video ad I’ve ever seen! Thought you was cool anyway, but now knowing you dabble in the synth zone made you 100% cooler! 😄
@brianmessemer29734 жыл бұрын
Thank you Maurice, I made the same reply above to Paul. He really is a diamond in the rough. We're so lucky to have his videos.
@andyronayne79474 жыл бұрын
I'm hoping Paul may indulge us with a synth/electronic music video one day.
@djbis4 жыл бұрын
@@andyronayne7947 I agree. I totally relate to his musical likes and a passion for electronics and technology. Even all that is outdated.
@marckhachfe12384 жыл бұрын
Agreed. This felt personal and not forced. Although i am not naive, i know it was just like any other ad, it well executed.
@aranstuart5664 жыл бұрын
i’m a stickler for nostalgia, always comforting when someone never forgets there roots
@thestrays8154 жыл бұрын
Their*
@aranstuart5664 жыл бұрын
@@thestrays815 good to see someone’s on top of there english (see what i did there)
@pugs63574 жыл бұрын
@@aranstuart566 NO GOD PLEASE NO
@Enceos4 жыл бұрын
I'm a bit disappointed there was no mention of the Soyuz two stage Launch Escape System, which saved people in the recent Soyuz failure. They already ditched the tower, but still had engines in the shroud.
@AttilaAsztalos4 жыл бұрын
I was almost convinced I must have missed it somehow, but apparently it really wasn't mentioned - so weird...!
@ManOnTheRange4 жыл бұрын
@@jim9930 you know that apollo 1 burn in testing sadly killing all 3 people inside???
@marcocasati69534 жыл бұрын
Yep, that's a prime example of launch escape gone right! To be fair (if i recall correctly) when the Soyuz failed, it had already jettisoned the tower, so if the video is about abort motors, they weren't used. also Spacex's F9/D2 in-flight abort test didn't get any love in this video.
@ManOnTheRange4 жыл бұрын
@@jim9930 you didnt realize why i write as reply to you what i write dont you??? :D
@ManOnTheRange4 жыл бұрын
@@marcocasati6953 but in 1983 was LES used saving 3 kozmonauts in one of the few sojuz failures
@Zeyervv4 жыл бұрын
I think its quite incredible that you can even make advertising appealing to listen to.
@SockyNoob4 жыл бұрын
Ikr. I actually looked up that thing he was sponsoring. Neat idea, plus we get to see into his past as well.
@antoniomaglione41014 жыл бұрын
You deserve more than a simple thumb-up! Your videos impress me for the completeness of both the research and the delivery style. As "Space fan" I followed the evolution of escape systems through the years; Willy Schirra got lucky with Gemini 6. The integrators forgot to remove the dust caps from the fuel feed duct, so the engine never started really, only the turbines did. There were all conditions to fire the ejection seats, but he trusted his sensorial perception that the rocket hadn't moved from the pad, so he didn't fire the ejection seats. I later learned there were risks due to the seat motors firing in the pure oxygen atmosphere inside the capsule, possibly causing harm to the astronauts. Nice to learn that you too were a electronic music expert... My most complex build was a full keyboard synth with (then expensive) 88 x ICL8038 waveform generators, a polyphonic dream for the time. Thank you again for the outstanding video...
@djbis4 жыл бұрын
now I feel like you should make a video on that synth of yours! 😁😉
@nacoran4 жыл бұрын
I think my grandfather had Robert Moog in one of his engineering classes. (My grandfather taught engineering at Cornell.)
@pugs63574 жыл бұрын
Very interesting.
@CheesyNugget3 жыл бұрын
Wish i was his grandson lol. That sounds really cool
@joaobettu4 жыл бұрын
15:58 Actually that's not accurate anymore. NASA authorized SpaceX to reuse Dragon's for crewed missions. The DM2 capsule, Endeavour, will be used by the Crew-2 mission.
@firefly4f44 жыл бұрын
Came here to say this. :) Anyone wishing to confirm can visit the Wikipedia page for "Crew Dragon Endeavour", and visit the cited links from there.
@gedw994 жыл бұрын
Nice for spaceX. Will save them money
@LimpRichard4 жыл бұрын
This is true
@sprtekid20034 жыл бұрын
Very true but required a contract modification if I remember because original did not allow them to reuse the dragon for manned flights but Elon usually gets his way
@bartvschuylenburg4 жыл бұрын
@@firefly4f4 yup, and reusing crew dragons for cargo was never a real plan. It was just speculation on space nerd forums and some clickbait websites.
@well_as_an_expert_id_say4 жыл бұрын
This guy takes "here's a fun fact" to a whole nother level
@thennoth28604 жыл бұрын
+well as an expert I'd say that's an epic name lol
@jpk514 жыл бұрын
1:02 So weird seeing young droid with hair I always imagined him born as this all knowing bald wizard
@sheevone43594 жыл бұрын
Even Dumbledore or Gandalf were babies once.
@highlypolishedturd79474 жыл бұрын
Hair today, gone tomorrow! ( I had all sorts of hair in the 80's too...)
@samukalel4 жыл бұрын
@@sheevone4359 Gandalf was born as an all knowing hairy and long bearded wizard.
@sylvain72773 жыл бұрын
@@sheevone4359 Gandalf and DUMBledore have NOTHING IN COMMON
@sheevone43593 жыл бұрын
@@sylvain7277 they're both human. That's one thing
@mysterygamer484 жыл бұрын
This guys needs more subs he has such high quality content
@layalumpar42184 жыл бұрын
Surprised you didn't even mention the successful unintended Soyuz abort a couple years ago.
@Bambarbia24474 жыл бұрын
@Alpha Centauri The tower jettisoned by Soyuz has secondary launch escape shroud which fired and pulled crew module from the rocket. So abort system was actually used
@twisterwiper4 жыл бұрын
This historic walkthrough of crew escape systems really exposes the reckless decision not to have any escape plan for the shuttle. I am amazed that anyone would fly that thing voluntarily.
@PunksloveTrumpys4 жыл бұрын
Have you seen the new Netflix series about the Challenger disaster? I didn't know this before but apparently the astronauts who flew the Shuttle were strongly opposed to NASA's decision to allow civilians on board. They knew it was dangerous and signed up knowing what risks they were taking, and didn't think it was right to risk the life of a civilian no matter how much good publicity they would get from it.
@twisterwiper4 жыл бұрын
Jared Freeland Yes I have seen it. It was very interesting. As one of them said, they still regarded it as a test vehicle. I’m just very happy that the newer rocket designs happening right now, take crew safety more seriously. So much exciting stuff going on in manned space flight again.
@originalmin4 жыл бұрын
@@twisterwiper laughs in Starship
@SweBeach20234 жыл бұрын
Well, can't the same be said for all the pilots flying towards almost certain doom during WW2? For some fame or loyalty is more important than safety.
@jasonmedina70584 жыл бұрын
Straight up, the host ALWAYS has the coolest shirts haha.
@rbmk__10004 жыл бұрын
He used to advertise the source as a site called madcap England I think
@jasonmedina70584 жыл бұрын
@@rbmk__1000 haha I don't think I could ever actually pull them off myself, but mad respect to him for rockin' it.
@ozaauliaramadhan14854 жыл бұрын
Come to Indonesia or Malaysia, you will find a lot of clothes with the same pattern like his
@cycadaacolyte63494 жыл бұрын
I started wearing paisley and floral prints because of him.
@cdanea4 жыл бұрын
Great video! I'm sure others have already pointed out that the Dragon 2 is now fully reusable, and not turned into a Cargo Dragon 2 after splashing. NASA accepted SpaceX's submission to reuse it. In fact DM2's Dragon is Crew 2's Dragon, planning for a return to the ISS in early 2021. Cheers and keep up the awesomeness
@_mikolaj_4 жыл бұрын
Does someone know how many times dragon can be reused?
@theyaregone4 жыл бұрын
@@_mikolaj_ one time but reusable
@_mikolaj_4 жыл бұрын
@@theyaregone if it would be 1 time, it wouldn't be reusable
@theyaregone4 жыл бұрын
@@_mikolaj_ if you had a sense of humor you would laugh
@_mikolaj_4 жыл бұрын
@@theyaregone i'm sorry but i grew out from simplistic jokes
@rdfox764 жыл бұрын
Side note, the Artemis LAS attitude control motor is *not* the first solid rocket motor to be thrust-vectored. Not only were the Space Shuttle's Solid Rocket Boosters equipped with thrust vectoring--which was the *only* means of control until they were jettisoned--but all solid-fuel ballistic missiles (including Minuteman, Polaris, Trident, etc.) use thrust vectoring to steer during boost, too.
@MrTrashmasterfx4 жыл бұрын
While true is still not full correct the difference is that the LAS uses valves formte vectoring, the SRB use there nozzle to controllable vector
@MrTrashmasterfx4 жыл бұрын
@Alpha Centauri maybe he meant exactly that new version on the sls LES because is hasn’t done before. Maybe just bad phrasing of words ;)
@TheExoplanetsChannel4 жыл бұрын
*February 1, 2003* _We will always remember you.._
@lifeisstr4nge4 жыл бұрын
Who?
@pugs63574 жыл бұрын
@@lifeisstr4nge uh duh February 1, 2003
@utkarshv24403 жыл бұрын
Rip kalpana :(
@dellpacker76573 жыл бұрын
ejections seat wouldve been useless in the columbia disaster but couldve worked in challenger althought unlikely
@ProjectNemesis924 жыл бұрын
Paul you're a blessing to us I for one am glad to have you around! Thanks for the great content. Great production!
@NathanLeeAnimations4 жыл бұрын
I liked this video because of how well he done his advert. Honestly never seen someone market something like this before. I'm impressed. I've also never liked a video because of their sponsor/advert lol, in particular one as long as this. Again excellently done.
@DaveWhiteInYoFace3 жыл бұрын
Would somebody please help this guy hit a million subs!? His videos are some of the best!!!!
@rocktakesover4 жыл бұрын
Great ad. Thanks for letting us a glimpse of your personal life. We know you were cool but had no idea you were that cool. Rock on
@clinthowe76293 жыл бұрын
I really love your channel Droid, thank you so much for all the entertaining and interesting content.
@raoulduke60434 жыл бұрын
Those shirts and Tangerine Dream go so well together! I wish you would make a few videos about your hobby and electronic music from the 70'. Maybe on a separate channel, but it would be glorious!
@heldersilva66724 жыл бұрын
Damn! Even that sponsor presentation was an amazing "Mr Shillito style" one.
@DW911S4 жыл бұрын
This is one of my favourite channels on youtube. Excellent research and presentation - please keep up for the good work :)
@chrissartain44304 жыл бұрын
Very cool to have this as your hobby back in the day!
@CuriousDroid4 жыл бұрын
Get Readly with 1 month FREE here: gb.readly.com/2020-curiousdroid EDIT 16-10-2020 : A few people have mentioned that I don't say anything about the Soyuz LES, well at 5:30 I show and caption the 1983 Soyuz T-10 launch abort, the only manned one to happen so far anywhere, i just didn't mention it in the commentary. I was going to include the 2018 Soyuz abort but the only footage was from the cabin interior showing the crew being bouncing around a bit and as the length was a bit long I dropped it in favour of more on the Dragon and its integrated escape system compared the the disposable Artemis/Orion one. There are several little bits about the Dragon which have now changed like the man rating of the sea landing Dragon but SpaceX are a quick moving company and I may have out of date info on some details, my bad really :-(
@TheExoplanetsChannel4 жыл бұрын
Great video.
@EgorAfonin4 жыл бұрын
Спасибо за вашу работу!
@badbenjy4 жыл бұрын
are you into modular?
@thetruthwillout90944 жыл бұрын
I still have a fully working ARP 2600, probably the only thing in my life I well never sell.
@badbenjy4 жыл бұрын
@@thetruthwillout9094 wow... Id have to lock myself in a room with it for a month.
@dinoschachten4 жыл бұрын
Very nice opening, with that authentic story and Readly. Fantastic concept also, cool sponsor that I hadn't heard of! :)
@richardbrayshaw5704 жыл бұрын
Excellent. Another fascinating subject explained with your usual clarity! Looking forward to the next on.
@annereilley48924 жыл бұрын
Some reason, these videos always make me feel good.
@adamgarnes42693 жыл бұрын
How do u not have more subscribers???!! This channel is amazing and you are brilliant. Shout out from Arizona
@KhrisKillerX4 жыл бұрын
Oh man, I usually tune out when the sponsored ad bit happens but the mention of Future Music magazine snapped me back to attention instantly. I bought every copy from '95 until 2004. Best electronic music mag ever! I only read and imported the UK version as the American version was terrible. Good memories 🙂
@Peter-fy4pj4 жыл бұрын
The best Ridley add I've seen so far.
@batman95924 жыл бұрын
Thank you for the insight into your personal life. It has been fascinating to a fellow enthusiast. I was born in the mid 80's and we had a 186 based PC. I could use DOS before i started Kindergarden and got pulled out of class to help office staff with the computers regularly. Curious where it all starts indeed. Eventually i got into music and had to modify everything i could get my hands on. There's still a stack of magazines in the shed i probably won't throw out too.
@MichaelRapp_Lichtgeplauder4 жыл бұрын
Another point worth mentioning with Gemini capsules: You'd be launching through a 100% pure oxygen environment using your ejection seat. AKA blasting on a small rocket through a very very combustable atmosphere. Aside from the additonal propulsion boost, quite detrimental to the crew's health. (This major design flaw of the Gemini escape system was pointed out on another YT chanel I happened upon some time back. Got me a huge grin.)
@Fred_the_19964 жыл бұрын
It's not that hard to just add nitrogen, America
@MichaelRapp_Lichtgeplauder4 жыл бұрын
@@Fred_the_1996 as I understand it, they chose the pure oxygen environment for weight and size considerations and then work with the side effects from there on. Still, up to Apollo 1, nobody took fire hazzards serious enough, though.
@Fred_the_19964 жыл бұрын
@@MichaelRapp_Lichtgeplauder yeah. The soviets did, though. Even with Vostok they mixed nitrogen
@Mike-oz4cv4 жыл бұрын
I dimly remember having heard that the Gemini ejection seats would probably have killed their users.
@MichaelRapp_Lichtgeplauder4 жыл бұрын
@@Mike-oz4cv I think that's the one I was referring to. kzbin.info/www/bejne/a3q1lY2gn9Zkf80
@krishnamverma4 жыл бұрын
Love the way you explain... Would have aced in my academics if my teachers explained like you 😁
@RedShift1124 жыл бұрын
Juicy bit of Curious Droid to start your day right.
@AinsleyHarriott14 жыл бұрын
Another seriously high quality video from CD. Consistent, entertaining, educating... there are few better channels!!!!! I learn so much from these. Thank you :)
@CuriousDroid4 жыл бұрын
Appreciate that :-)
4 жыл бұрын
You're even make ads sound interesting. Thanks a lot for this channel.
@FlyWithMe_6664 жыл бұрын
Escaping from exploding rockets - story of my life.
@hellomjb4 жыл бұрын
I see you've met my ex...
@hellomjb4 жыл бұрын
@Terence never caught your dad's name, he couldn't talk with his mouth full.
@3isr3g3n4 жыл бұрын
Mad respect for building your own Synth at that age, what a story!
@treavormiller95524 жыл бұрын
16:00 the crewed dragon will actually be reused for crewed mission’s (recent change) 16:12 and the SuperDracos aren’t actually used for orbital maneuvering or station orbit raising, they use the Draco RCS thrusters for that.
@AndreSomers4 жыл бұрын
Yup. It is true though that the fuel is shared between the super draco's and the RCS trusters, further reducing weight.
@originalmin4 жыл бұрын
@@AndreSomers I’m fairly certain this is false. Do you have a source?
@AndreSomers4 жыл бұрын
@@originalmin Thanks for asking. I don't have a link or something I can provide you know. I remembered from commentary from the Everyday Astronaut on the Demo 1 mission I think, but I am now starting to doubt myself. One hint I just found is "This high-thrust hypergolic engine-about 200 times larger than the Draco RCS thruster hypergolic engine-offers deep throttling ability and just like the Draco thruster, has multiple restart capability and uses the same *shared* hypergolic propellants." (from en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SpaceX_Draco#SuperDraco - my empasis.) Another source (also poor) source is this discussion, where it is suggested that they share tanks but not the pressurization system, or they at least are able to cross-feed: www.reddit.com/r/SpaceXLounge/comments/elq9lt/rcs_and_super_draco_shared_fuel/
@leephilpott66554 жыл бұрын
No finer edification when you're enjoying some herbal enlightenment. Nice work. As always
@madwax47714 жыл бұрын
Nice plug for Readly. Didn't feel like an advertisement 👍
@patrickdunning98206 ай бұрын
Always something new I learnt keep it up!
@1977Yakko4 жыл бұрын
Ah, the 80's. Good times. Great music. The "way back times" before the internet. Plus, I had hair back then too. ;-)
@CuriousDroid4 жыл бұрын
Yes, it seemed all so simple back then, 3 TV channels, no mobile phones (that you could afford), no internet, no satellite TV, no GPS and we all got by fine. Now every other person has their head in a phone, and cant find their way without the sat nav and as for that there internet..... jeees
@moltom264 жыл бұрын
You forgot to mention the semi-recent use (2018) of the soviet LES for MS-10 with NASA Astronaut Nick Hague
@kaltenstein77184 жыл бұрын
In fact, part of the thinking behind the ejection seats on gemeni was, that it was planned to land the capsule on wheels with a paraglider, where the ejection seats would be also required in case of emergency
@JohnWilliamNowak4 жыл бұрын
Right; I suspect that is one of the reasons the ejection seats were used. Like Vostok, they might also be used during landing.
@RobSchofield4 жыл бұрын
Given your short intro about your younger years, it seems we followed the same mags, and had the same interests (music, especially), at the same time! I built an Elektor Formant which taught me a lot about practical electronics (my first use of PCBs, incidentally) before going on to make it a career. Now I need to start wearing spectacular shirts. Great episode, very informative.
@io44394 жыл бұрын
Thank goodness for Sponsor Block
@driptopia4 жыл бұрын
I don't read magazines and I know I won't, but that ad really made me want too.
@connormackay70984 жыл бұрын
I'm surprised there was no mention of Soyuz T-10-1. It's so far the only use of a LES tower with a crew onboard. The rocket was on the launchpad when a failure in the rocket caused it to light on fire. The launch escape system was fired, pulling the crew capsule away with about 15 g of acceleration, and a split second later the rocket violently exploded. The LES saved the lives of the crew, who immediately requested cigarettes and vodka when they were greeted by recovery crews.
@willlucas51504 жыл бұрын
I can't wait for you to hit 1 million subs. Definitely deserve it!
@jpotter20864 жыл бұрын
Surprised the first thought wasn't, "Eh, it's an honor just to be in the can."
@HuheJass4 жыл бұрын
Probably partially was but I imagine the astronauts /and training are considered much too expensive to be expendable
@JohanFruend4 жыл бұрын
Dead astronauts might also have a negative impact on funding.
@georgesiv20824 жыл бұрын
Always exciting to see rocket blowing up.
@alphabeets4 жыл бұрын
Loved the synth ad. I had no idea you were a synth nut!
@Adrian_Nel4 жыл бұрын
MUCH more interesting than US military stuff. Thank you Mr. S.
@HOLLYWOODUNAPOLOGETIC4 жыл бұрын
I dig today's shirt! Thanks for offering us these videos.
@andrewdavies13124 жыл бұрын
Yes. New content. Happy days.
@Ap-yu5vq4 жыл бұрын
The only American used this system was "Tyler Nicklaus Hague " in Soyuz MS 10
@lunarpassion4 жыл бұрын
They aborted with main engines, escape tower was already jettisoned.
@JR-yl8qi4 жыл бұрын
@@lunarpassion Not exactly, "So the capsule was pulled away by the backup thrusters mounted on the fairing." www.rt.com/news/441125-russian-launch-escape-system/ Further, "Beginning with the Apollo-Soyuz Test Project, the Soyuz spacecraft also has a secondary set of four rocket motors at the top of the fairing that can propel the escape head section away from the rocket during the period between the jettisoning of the SAS at T+115s until fairing deployment at T+157s. In contrast to the SAS these rockets only move the escape head section a small distance away from the rocket, as at these altitudes there is enough time for the landing system to deploy.[4] " en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soyuz_abort_modes So the Russians have 2 abort options that pull the capsule away (can't abort to orbit) First is with the tower, which was jettisoned by the time the accident occurred. The second option was the faring rockets which were used but were not main engines.
@Sonderax4 жыл бұрын
My guys 58. Respect dude, love the content and effort you put in
@ԱրամՔերոբյան4 жыл бұрын
yay! Finally something space related
@jonathanyork89774 жыл бұрын
Excellent video as usual. Can't wait till the next moon missions!
@cparedes23023 жыл бұрын
Excellent! Many thanks I thought Little Joe was a test / accident of the safety system for Apollo. I had no idea it was used for Mercury
@svenzikobombardo3 жыл бұрын
Man, you're a nerd and so am I, but you wear psychedelic shirts and I wear only t-shirts... You win!
@hondatuner51564 жыл бұрын
NASA actually gave SpaceX the ok to reuse crew dragon again for crewed flight after splashdown
@AttilaAsztalos4 жыл бұрын
@Mr Prongles Contact with salt water, which is on its own the reason so many things have a "marine" version meant to put up with that corrosive torture slightly longer than the normal stuff everyone uses. If SpaceX got the ok, then presumably their stuff has also been shown to survive a brief bit of friendly etching action.
@rbmk__10004 жыл бұрын
I bet Synthesizer Shillito could perfect the basoon
@Dan-kz6dz4 жыл бұрын
Nearly 1 million well done 👍
@Alan-in-Bama3 жыл бұрын
The closest we've ever came to an Abort/Astronaut Launch escape was Gemini VI....in which the engines shut down just as they powered up. Thanks to Astronaut Wally Schirra's courage NOT to turn the abort handle, the Gemini VI + VII rendezvous flight was able to launch soon after & the program remained on schedule.
@theyaregone4 жыл бұрын
As always great content! Thank you Paul
@Jablicek4 жыл бұрын
I'd just like to say, your shirt is amazing! The fabric is such a lovely design :)
@mirador6984 жыл бұрын
Great video! One minor issue: The Super Dracos can‘t be used to lift the ISS because after that explosion 💥 on the test stand SpaceX replaced the fuel valves with some break through plates. Therefore the Super Dracos can only be started once and then burn until they run out of fuel, hence they are really just a launch escape system now.
@huppysimracing4 жыл бұрын
Nice, that looked like a BBC Model A? I learned to program in BBC BASIC using a BBC Mobel B here in Australai. BBC micro has some presence in schools here. Nostalgia. Then we got the Acorn Archimedes RISC computers - they were amazing for their time.
@laurentbarrere65304 жыл бұрын
Well, great vidéo but missing the soyouz escape last year!!!! So unfortunate.
@cold_jay4 жыл бұрын
Sponsorblock volunteers have really come here early. Thank you!
@johnbeeck25404 жыл бұрын
Another great program! Thank you!
@thelastupdate86334 жыл бұрын
Very nice video, I really enjoy your videos in general and I was able to learn some very exciting stuff for School. Thank you very much
@soggycracker59344 жыл бұрын
Never regret Curious Droid.
@randywatson83474 жыл бұрын
Never knew you are a synth guy! Cool! One fundamental problem is that the pod has no secure lines to hang it undependantly from the rocket, preventing it to fall down after an explosion.
@echalone4 жыл бұрын
Actually Crew Dragon will now also be reused for crewed flights ;) Crew-2 will reuse the capsule of the Demo-2 mission for example
@shakeymike20034 жыл бұрын
Great narration, kept me gripped and i dont even like rockets or crew safety deployment systems lol!
@hanky55693 жыл бұрын
This channel is amazing
@adampoll49774 жыл бұрын
Little bit of personal history and you are now even cooler! ;)
@helldotsin4 жыл бұрын
Just that intro with your life experiences got me to like your vid.
@SockyNoob4 жыл бұрын
A genuine ad? Woah. I unfortunately never had electronics magazines, just car ones that my doctor would give me lol.
@IARRCSimАй бұрын
13:35 "NASA's Artimis Mission that will hopefully return man to the Moon by 2024" aged well. Hopefully that happens by 2030 but any year NASA or SpaceX gives will likely be a multiple times sooner than reality because every schedule gets that underestimated.
@andrewpearson35984 жыл бұрын
Great vid again Paul
@BRZZ-xw4hd4 жыл бұрын
awesome vid Paul thanks...peace out
@d33pNacho4 жыл бұрын
Nice video, nice shirt and nice 80's bedroom
@steven401ytx4 жыл бұрын
I love this channel.
@ricksadler7974 жыл бұрын
That actually looks like fun
@ivan-ywr4 жыл бұрын
Simply brilliant!
@Nghilifa4 жыл бұрын
The Launch Escape System on the Apollo was not switched off automatically. The Astronauts switched it from "Auto" to "Manual" a short time before Staging the S-IC during the boost phase. They depict this in the launch sequence in the movie Apollo 13, although they erroneously show the escape tower jettisoning as a result of that switch change (which didn't happen in real life, as the tower was jettisoned moments after skirt-sep some time after S-IC staging) .
@dingdongdirtbag4 жыл бұрын
Thanks for sharing your past with us!
@colintraveller4 жыл бұрын
Quality as always
@archtroll4 жыл бұрын
i dont get why anyone downvotes this guys videos it must be some automated hater-bot or something