Custom BDC Reticle for Hunting - Sig Sauer's BDX System (Review)

[@JA-rc4uy]

I've been hunting for about 6 years so still a newbie. But I have the Sig BDX scope and range finder and have loved them from day one when I sighted in my rifle. Sure the scope is a little heavier than others due to the electronics inside but not by much. In my opinion the results you get down range after pulling the trigger are worth the little extra weight.

[@roberta6360]

Tried this BDX integrated scope/binocular system with the Sig Sauer Cross PRS in 6.5 Creedmoor just yesterday at Sig Freedom Days event at Ben Avery range in Phoenix.......my gaaaaawd! It is absolutely mind-blowing how well the red dot adjusts quickly at different ranges with all the BDC calcs done for you automatically! I only shot at 100 yd and 300 yd with the Sig rep spotting but i was able to come on target quite easily, despite never having fired the rifle. Also, another Sig rep there informed me that Sig Sauer recently purchased an ammo manufacturing facility so they actually manufacture their own rounds now which is definitely a plus. This system is absolutely incredible. FYI, if there's a Sig Freedom event near you - I highly recommend attending as you'll get to try a wide variety of Sig pistols and rifles. Thanks for your review video. Subscribed.

[@russellmoore963]

Put one on my dad's crossbow and it works so good . 115 yards to 35 and deadly accurate . He loves it .

[@ftav1008]

Did you have to zero the scope first?

[@russellmoore963]

@@ftav1008 we used 35 yards as our zero .

[@claythomas9467]

I had no clue about the preloaded set ups by turning the zoom. Awesome.

[@EastmansHuntingJournals]

Simple and effective! Thanks for watching 👍

[@salcidojosiah]

Seem pretty cool for new long range shooters, idk if I'm sold on it, maybe when the range finder in built into the scope.

[@jamesdewer]

Recoil kills scopes. especially 30.06 or 308. that type of technology even the existing current builds can't handle heavy semi auto 308. I think these scopes are for the light shooter.

[@aquarionh2o132]

Burris has everything built into the scope...but you pay for it.

[@EastmansHuntingJournals]

This setup is definitely not just for long range shooters. Very useful tool for all ranges and all shooters. Brandon has been running this setup since it came out with ZERO flaws or issues.

[@marka980]

A built-in range finder in the scope, like the Burris Eliminator, is illegal to use in PA for hunting. As long as I use a seperate range finder for my scope, I'm golden.

[@aljosaskrabelj8412]

​@@aquarionh2o132 Meh Sig BDX of similar magnification + top rangefinder is not much cheaper then Eliminator.

[@bjordan672]

It has not made hunting any easier as it doesn't change the need to find game or stalk within range without being detected. What it does it to reduce the chances of wounding animals, ensuring that I am able to take the most ethical shots possible.

[@olsonfun]

Ok that's cool, can load your own bdc reticle and not just a general one

[@gmcilwain]

can you use the sight without the technology being active especially with the Sierra models?

[@jamesdewer]

This isn't for the average rifle range fan. I mean a rifle range is just that, distance is pre- ranged. I find that it's shooting steel and busting rocks when you can really impress your buddies. I adopted this back in 2019 and the first iteration had a steep learning curve and was maddening when the app would mandaIte an update before it would come up. So basically the rangefinder was out. In fact I had two range finders Kilo 2200, die right in the middle of a shoot. Justin at Sig EO shipped me a new one arriving overnight FEDEX. The first iteration of this platform had issues and SIG would have made life immesuraly more satisfying had SIG incluided a FLOW CHART. IT was over whelming. I just realized that without a RF and just the Phone paired to the scope you must switch off in the sight module on the off the Ballistic reticle "off" while it's off it still pairs phone bdx app to scope and you get corrections based on availabilty of weather service. One you come up the curve you'll be giddy and the system is so well thought out. I shot teamed up with a buddy and man is it fun. I bought extra rangefinders just in case. Honestly, its; near impossile to hold a RF on a target 1200m away.I hold the RF pressed against my optic to steady and make my shot. If you're only shooting to 400yds with optics this doesn't make sense, but it you are interested in going yard, and are not a trainned marksman you'll agree it's fantastic. My wife loves it, I told her to,

[@enam100]

Thank you. Great review. 👍 really thinking of one.

[@EastmansHuntingJournals]

Glad it was helpful!

[@Alberta1stPodcast]

Can you do a review on their new BDX scope? Easy 6 BDX its called, came out this year. I subbed very cool review to the point & video of the scope & app

[@rossauce12]

What is the difference between this or just a rangefinder and dialing the mils in a free hornady app?

[@firefox396]

The 15 seconds it takes to do that😂, a long time while hunting or in combat, whichever purpose you are using the rifle for

[@ericb.4358]

Lessee...Sierra6 BDX 3 - 18 x 44 scope, Bluetooth enabled rangefinder binocular and KESTREL 5700 Bluetooth enabled weather meter/ballistic engine. Do I STILL need to carry a smart phone?

[@Bergerac82]

No. You just need to pair the scope and Kestrel in advance.

[@mayconmaycon1350]

friend can I use a Scope like this on a 22lr rifle?

[@eloymarquez4783]

Yes

[@mando1783]

Will this hold up to a 50 bmg?

[@adloutdoors]

What scope would be best to see clearly at 500 yards? I just got my cross in .308 and was thinking about 3bdx 6.5 20x52 as a hunting scope. Thanks!

[@EastmansHuntingJournals]

All of the Sig scopes are clear. The biggest decision to make is weight and features. Because we hunt in the backcountry a lot, we gravitate towards the lighter 44mm scopes, but if weight isn't a consideration, the 52mm will gather more light and have a wider field of view.

[@adloutdoors]

Thanks for that reply. We do a lot of open plains and a lot of longer-range hunts in Southern Idaho. Never used a 6.5 -20x52 power scope. Wondered if it would fill the spot. I appreciate the info.

[@dethtour]

What did you end up getting? I got my cross in 308 and slapped the 44mm on it and im clapping deer at 300yards all day. I was going to go for the 20 zoom but the cross is an incredibly light rifle so I didn't want to add more weight than necessary.

[@adloutdoors]

​@@dethtour I went back and forth with a Meopta Optika 6 3-18x50 and Leupold 3-15x44. I love the Meopta but the weight is noticeable at 30oz VS 19 oz. I did get a Leupold 4-24x52 but ended up putting it on my 7mm. I love that scope and took a big buck at 338 yards last month. I will keep looking for the right scope for my Sig. I've been waiting for my can that has been held hostage since last April, so I didn't hunt with it this season. Anyway, I really like the bigger objective because we always seem to take our deer late in low light. I am hoping Sig puts out hunting scopes with at least 50mm objectives, but still considering. Thanks for your input on the 44mm!

[@jmf1976jmf]

Can you enter your load information instead of relying on 8 generic profiles?

[@EastmansHuntingJournals]

Yes! You can enter in your personal load data and save several profiles for various rifles/setups you have. Brandon has his and his son's saved for quick usage in the field.

[@jmf1976jmf]

@@EastmansHuntingJournals thank you

[@jacksonwholeexperience409]

Just got the Kilo 2200LRH BDX rangefinder. Is there any fancy about that when used with the app but I don’t have the rifle scope?

[@carlosgonzales7818]

If you own a scope with a MOA or MIL reticle you can set your range finder to the ballistics of your shooting platform, the ranger finder will tell you the hold over. I have a Leupold Mark 4 in MIL with the H-37 reticle and also use this with the SIG range finder. The only advantage I can see with the SIG scope is the ability to see your hold over with out the need to count your hash marks, but then if your really familiar with your equipment you should be OK..

[@robertdole5391]

Where can I get that portable table!!??

[@EastmansHuntingJournals]

www.stukeysbenches.com/ Made right here in Powell, WY by a guy named Royal Stukey. Unreal benches!

[@ftav1008]

Do u zero the scop first?

[@EastmansHuntingJournals]

Yep, you zero the scope to whatever you want your zero to be, then put that info in the app as well as your ballistic info. They, you're all set! Super easy to use.

[@cesaracuna4234]

Yes

[@jtater25]

this scope doesn't even have a group for 450 bushmaster ...why? it's a common hunting round

[@nathanbeerman1506]

Anyone else think that scope looks a little lose at 1:30 ish? To me it doesnt look like the whole gun moving just the scope and mounts....

[@nathanbeerman1506]

At first yes both move but watch carefully carefully when he brings the scope back to lowest powe

[@rossauce12]

You are 100% right. I think they didn't even use it they just read what it does and acted like its what they use lol

[@AlexMichael311]

What scope base are you using there?

[@EastmansHuntingJournals]

iota ring/base combo. Bombproof setup!

[@MeesterGonzalez]

2:12 Dude, that's like slapping your buddy on the ass, just as he's about to 'get some'. LOL

[@EastmansHuntingJournals]

LOL...that's funny.

[@Just_Samson]

TV remotes are IR not BT. Just saying 😂 Great vid

[@EastmansHuntingJournals]

Whoops! Thanks for your comment!

[@PaulVerhoeven2]

Almost always, yes. But Vizio used to make TVs with awesome little slide-out-keyboard remotes, those worked through Bluetooth. Some Roku and RokuTV remotes do not work through IR either, you don't have to point them at the device they control, although I don't know if they use specifically Bluetooth as their protocol.

[@luissandoval4093]

Nice review! Just want to know about the windage. Does the range finder also calculates the wind drift? or just the elevation. I cant find any review describing that thanks

[@jamesdewer]

hi it will need a data connection and will occasionally not pair phone to scope and will tell you "no wind data avail connect to net work" I almost lost it. I get the opportunity to hunt 2x a year. I just haven't had luck with BDX. lifetime warranty is there for a reason. The Rangefinder took a shit requiring a factory update in the middle of no where. Had to ship it in. Sig sent me a new sealed unit. but still, I wasn't at the time aware of the presets 1-10. Speaking of the Scope I have 3 BDX scopes my 3.5-8 which I have mounted on my AR10 16" carbine took a shit on me during a hike through a hot canyon. I was blasting boulders and needed to adjust windage. The witness mark broke free and to me that was game over. 400 yds even at 8x with a 308 it's impossible to be certain if you're sending ricochets into someone so lacking absolute control of shot placement I was lugging around a box of shells and a useless weight. I dunno what he's got it mounted on here but it appears these scopes can't handle recoil past 300 RDS of 308. I have a different set up on my 18" with a brake, AG6 Epsilon. I hope that's more gentle on the scope. I'm using Warne QD mounts and low rings. I digress. Sig need to make this video years ago. they need to drop the mandatory 4G updates which won't allow you to pair unless ALL DATA fields are complete and that requires signal. I don't give a crap about windage in a windless situation! why the Heck do I need signal to pair the phone to the scope? Sig needs to be crystal clear about usage instructions. a flow chart would cut the steep learning curve significantly. you could write a book about pairing the phone to the range finder. Sig should kill the scope and Kilo connection and make it phone to riflescope only. Folks this BDX is complicated. After I finally achieved consistency the equipment failed. Justin at Sig in Oregon was great and your warranty replacement items need to match. Scope and Box SN need to match otherwise return it to the seller immediately. Register your products CYA with Sig. replacements once inspected. About a day, are shipped 2nd day Fed Excuse. If you're in SF like me that's 1day shipping which I very much appreciate both ways. Sorry to be so.negative but just.my.experieces. I shoot often and safety is always paramount. If your uncertain and shooting with unzeroed gear you should be made to run naked downrange barefoot.

[@EastmansHuntingJournals]

You can put the windage into your data in the app.

[@w.t.pstandforyourlife.5639]

😮 that's so 👍

[@ipodhty]

Most tv remotes aren't Bluetooth but are ir

[@Kriptoker]

How the hell is the dot on the center of the reticle a 200 yard zero, and the 100 yard mark is lower on the reticle, causing you to have to do a holdover for 100 yd? And the 300 yd mark is higher up on the reticle than the 100 yd mark. Some shit is screwed up.

[@Gavin_0710]

I think it adjust so the 100 would be dead center, 200 a little below that and so on.

[@EastmansHuntingJournals]

???

[@m444ss]

Mentioned "fair chase standards" -- Let's say the state wildlife management agency has determined the ecosystem needs less deer, hence the deer season bag limit. Now let's say Hunter X goes out to get some deer, hopefully the full bag limit. The deer will go to Hunter X's freezer for the next 12 months' meat with all excess meat going to Hunters for the Hungry or similar charity. What's the moral basis for making it harder for Hunter X to bag those deer? Why is it "immoral" for Hiunter X to feed the fam + plus a fair number of otherwise malnourished people if Hunter X, for example, hunts from a blind 70 yards downwind from a feeder? Is that less fair that eating an antibiotic laden chuck roast from a steer taken from a fenced pasture? Did "indigenous people" 400 years ago refuse to eat venison when one of the tribe bagged a deer in an "unfair" manner? Inquiring minds would really like a logical response (rather than tropes and insults).

[@mobsquad8500]

This is a commercial not a review

[@EastmansHuntingJournals]

It's a review. Used it a TON in the field and wanted to clarify what it is and what it isn't because we get a lot of questions on it.

[@ryanbrand3946]

Commercial

[@dogtaggers2312]

Burris eliminator 3 is better. Get rid of all that other garbage linking devices and settings. Just range with the scope, hold and shoot.

[@solar7927]

this is a workaround to the hunting laws that outlaw scopes with a built in range finder, plus this is a much cheaper option

[@dirtyrotter4057]

Yep and almost 3 times the price

[@dirtyrotter4057]

@@solar7927 where can't you use built in range finders in a scope?

[@chevyhoss69]

The burris are so big and bulky

[@marka980]

@@dirtyrotter4057 It's illegal in PA to hunt with scopes that have a built-in range finder.

[@Crottedenez1000]

Hmm, you should remove the 2:15 sequel, talking about “ethical” shot and showing such a miss is kind of weird…

[@EastmansHuntingJournals]

That's no miss, my friend. Brandon hit that bull hard 3 times before he disappeared in the timber. 3 lethal shots, mind you, but the bull was still on his feet with light fading in grizzly country. We take no chances of losing animals out here. This is serious business!

[@Crottedenez1000]

@@EastmansHuntingJournals I hope so, that’s the least you owe to your prey… But again : talking about “ethical shots ” and bragging about the outstanding features of this high-tech scope, is in complete opposition with the shown shot where you can clearly see the elk having been hit on the upper part of his forehand, a very bad spot for a clean kill. I ´m sure you can do it better (at least I hope so for the sake of the animals), so you should rather show that than a very weak skill leaving the animal suffer in agony (Sorry for my bad English)

[@jokerlt1z]

@@Crottedenez1000 it is painfully obvious your lack of knowledge for hunting, shooting and ethical shot placement far outweigh the poor English and grammar. This was just meant to be a simple illustration of the optics operation and ability.

[@Crottedenez1000]

@@jokerlt1z You may insult me as much as you need, and brag about your own, so much better, knowledge of “ethical hunting ” , “lethal shot placement ” and so on, I won’t even start arguing with you. Fact is, again : the (miss)shot shown in the video wasn’t definitely placed where it should have been and is a disastrous example of the capacities of the scope. I’m sure one could do it better and it’s just a complete lack of professionalism in advertising when using such a messed up video sequence for illustrating a product one wanna praise and sale. Nothing more, nothing less. And for my bad English, I’ve already apologized. You can keep on criticizing it, the day you perfectly master three languages and your own knowledge of my mother tongue is as good (or as bad) as mine for English…

[@ryanbrand3946]

Way to hard to use

[@dirtyrotter4057]

I'm not really a fan of having all my ballistic info being sent to my phone. Call me a conspiracy nut.

[@mrmeener625]

nice guy not a know it all azzhole explains very clearly what to do with this exceptional scope. wonder how it would hold up under rough usage. Burris had a scope the eliminator with a range finder built in