Thank you so much tesfa and semer 🤝🏽አነ ከማካሞ አይነት ኢዮ ዘሕጉሰኔ ።i am 😁🎉🎉🎉🎉
@mosazghiberihu1500Ай бұрын
Thanks Yodit for bringing those bold men. We have to accept, believe and live in individual human rights. Is the foundation to move on and transfom a nation.
Tesfay keman animal farm anbibka , ni ato Drar kitenaso aytifetin. I am sure Aya Drar is very smart and hi IQ than both of you. Don’t try to keep anyone down.
@user-wt2uy2jh8nАй бұрын
Thank you very much guys i love your ideas so much. This is new and hard thing for eritrean people to hear this kind of open mind political talks.
Pls stop talking about mad man. Aya Dirar he can’t help him self.
@zemikieltesfazion4908Ай бұрын
Nezi kalsi endagozazeyu nidhrit melisemo
@JustOne77Ай бұрын
YOUR TALK ABOUT THE IMPORTANCE OF RIGHTS IS GENERALLY GOOD...BUT YOY ARE WRONG IN STATING THAT RIGHTS ARE ONLY INDIVIDUAL....HUMAN RIGHTS CONVENTION RECOGNIZES BOTH INDIVIDUAL AND GROUP RIGHTS (CULTURAL-RIGHTS)... IT IS TRUE THAT THERE IS A DISCUSSION CONCERNING WHETHER THE EMPHASIS SHOULD BE ON INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS OR GROUP RIGHTS...AND THAT DISCUSSION IS USUALY TIED TO RIGHT OR LEFT LEANING POLITICAL IDEOLOGY, ALSO VERY OFTEN LINKED TO ECONOMIC ORGANIZATION OF SOCIETY....GENERALLY YOUR STATEMENT THAT THERE ARE NO GROUP RIGHT IS A GRAVE DISTORTION OF REALITY....YOU ARE ESSENTIALLY SAYING THAT THE SOCIAL DOES NOT EXIST.....IF THE SOCIAL DID NOT EXIST..THERE WOULD BE NO HISTORY...FAMILY ITSELF IS A SOCIAL UNIT.... THE FAMILY AS A SOCIAL GROUP HAS A RIGHT RECOGNIZED BOTH BY THE STATE AND BY INTERNATIONAL LAW....ARTICLE 16 OF THE UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS (UDHR)...DEFINES THE FAMILY AS 'THE NATURAL AND FUNDAMENTAL GROUP UNIT OF SOCIETY' AND FURTHER DECLARES THE FAMILY AS DEFINED "IS ENTITELED TO PROTECTION BY THE STATE"......SIMILARLY BIGGER UNITS LIKE ETHNICITIES HAVE COLLECTIVE RIGHTS AS A WHOLE...THE INDIVIDUALS WITHIN THAT ETHNICITY HAVE INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS , BUT THEIR ETHNICITY HAS ALSO COLLECTIVE RIGHT AS A WHOLE....WHICH MEANS THAT SOMEONE WHO BELONG TO THE BILEN OR SAHO OR TIGRINIA ETHNICITY HAVE INDIVIDUAL RIGHT AS AN INDIVIDUAL WITHIN HIS/HER ETHNICITY AND WITHIN THE NATION-STATE.....THEY HAVE ALSO CULTURAL RIGHTS AS BELONGING TO A SPECIFIC ETHNICITY......BUT THOSE ETHNIC RIGHTS SHOULD NOT OPRESS THE INDIVIDUAL....FOR INSTANCE FEMALE GENITALIA MUTILATION (FGM) IS NOT A GROUP RIGHT...... YOUR ASERTION THAT NATIONS DO NOT HAVE RIGHTS IS WRONG....READ THE 'MONTEVIDEO CONVENTION ON THE RIGHTS AND DUTIES OF STATES'.....ENACTED 26-12-1933.....IN FORCE 26-12-1934. YOUR MAIN PROBLEM AS I SEE IT IS, THAT YOU REFUSE TO RECOGNIZE THAT WE LIVE IN A WORLD OF NATION-STATES....BY MAKING SUBVERSION AN INDIVIDUAL RIGHT YOU ARE HOLDING OPEN THE DOOR TO UNDERMINE THE FOUNDATION OF ANY NATION.....ONE HAVE A LEGITIMATE AND MORAL RIGHT TO RISE AGAINST THE STATE IF IT IS OPRESSIVE...BECAUSE THE STATE IS UNDERMINING ITSELF....BUT AS LONG AS A THE STATE PROVIDES FOR THE RIGHTS OF ITS CITZENS AND POPULATION WITHIN ITS TERRITORY IT ALSO HAVE THE RIGHT TO UPHOLD ITS INTEGRITY AND DEMAND LOYALITY FROM ITS CITZENS WITHIN REASONABLE BOUNDARIES...A NATION IS A SOCIAL ORGANIZATION ON A MACRO LEVEL....SUCH SOCIAL ORGANIZATIONS CAN BE DISMANTLED BY THE HANDS OF TIME BUT THE INTENT TO DISMANTEL A NATION CAN NEVER BE A RIGHT GIVEN BY THE SAME SOCIAL ORGANIZATION THAT YOU ARE SEEKING TO DISMANTLE.....THIS IS ONLY A COMMENT ON THE ISSUE OF INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS AND YOUR STATEMENT THAT NATIONS HAVE NO RIGHT.... I COULD GO ON TO YOUR OTHER PREPOSITIONS BUT THEN I WOULD BE TYPING FOR HOURS....