Clear , simple and flexible to understand for anyone 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
@NaveenKumar-em6jj4 жыл бұрын
Thanks for your explanation, audible is clear to hear as well as easily understandable ❤️👍
@surusvillage65953 жыл бұрын
If daughter born before 1956, then that daughter can get equal rights in her father's property?
@smellofsoil92212 жыл бұрын
You are telling for intestate properties. For partitioned properties what about the judgement? Thanks.
@Fun_with_ashwanth_official3 жыл бұрын
நன்றி. ஆங்கில கலப்பு இல்லாமல் தனி தமிழாக இருந்தால் எளிமையாக புரிந்துகொள்ள முடியும்
@sixthsenseculminate7624 жыл бұрын
Crispy & Crystal Explanation With Good Information......!!!!!
@HemalathaSurendiran3 жыл бұрын
Father died in 2008. 2005 year la irunthu 12 years varaikum thaan antha daughter ku properties la rights irukum. 12 years mudinchiruchuna automatically daughter ku antha rights illanthiduvanganu solluranga. Whether it's true or not. Pls help sister.
@ganesanganesan9560 Жыл бұрын
Why madam not told anything about the cut of date 20/12/2004 repeat 2/12 /2004. Vinitha Sharma case is not fully explained.As per 1956 act if the partition carried out after that it could be taken as self acquired property.
@rpalanisamy2299 Жыл бұрын
Good. Useful. For Hindu. Women's. Equal. Rights11.8.2020central.acts.thanks.alot
@suryak5464 жыл бұрын
Mam, your video is useful for upsc aspirants....
@vivekanandanshanmugam99643 жыл бұрын
My Grandfather died in 1995 intestate. He has a son and two daughters. His only son (Uncle) died in 1991 before him. Grandson sold one part of the property in 1997 & Balance property as Gift deed to his wife in 2002 without the knowledge of daughters. Does the daughters have the rights to claim the property?. Please explain. Thanks.
@1989vijayaphysio3 жыл бұрын
My father self acquired property wrote 97 percent to my brother and 3 percent to me. 1.Out of that 1 property he sold after registering the will and not compensation given. 2.after he wrote will and registered he was live16 years during that period he brought 6 properties all directly registered to my brother and that is not mentioned will. My question 1 is that will valid 2.is I have the right to get 50 percent of unfilled but directly registered on my brother name. 3.what are possible chances what kind of step will practically applicable .please reply
@bharathvajk91794 жыл бұрын
AKKA super ah solreenga, enakku oru doubt ka if you are free to read this clarify this, if the females who already put a sign states that, i don't want your property, and the property's name also changed to male, after this judgement shall they claim that , i want a share in property ? can they claim ?
@sujikalki2 жыл бұрын
Hi mam, My grandfather who wrote a will in the year 1947, as such after his death his self acquired property should be given to his (son's children's) @grandson's . While writing the will my father was minor. After his marriage all the 4 brothers decided to partion the house and land equally among them and registered the (after partion )house to their names through law and registered the house to their names.Now my father is no more (2017 he passed away ) and the house patta was in his name before his( death). My sibling registered the house patta to my name and to his name. I asked for a share he is saying. There is no share for daughters as such the will is very clear the property is for only grandsons. If I move through by law do I get any share?. Kindly reply mam.
@deepapriya75543 жыл бұрын
If house is the only property of the father where he lived with his son. He has a son and daughters how they share among themselves. Can explain plz.
@zebronicstech69544 жыл бұрын
Madam enaku anchestral property oru 50 cent iruku enaku theriyaama enga appa enoda brother ku eludhi kuduthutanga idhuku nan case pota jeika mudiuma enaku equal rights kedaikuma im a girl
@rajv93993 жыл бұрын
Yesss of course ... U have rights and u can claim 👍
@ramaachuthantamilarasan84774 жыл бұрын
My mother's property encroached by my uncle. He has a document stating enam or thanam. How to handle
@rajv93993 жыл бұрын
Yes it can be solved
@rajendranraj36213 жыл бұрын
What about the property already sold out, without the consent of the daugters, ie., of the ancestral property.
@ragulakshai54474 жыл бұрын
long day confusion came to end thanks mam
@jeevaradha97894 жыл бұрын
Thank you. Useful info
@rajasekars21933 жыл бұрын
Hi sis, thanks for the explanation. my friends father register a tana settlement to her brother all propertys including coparcenary, how she get her rights
@going-mute2 жыл бұрын
Nice video. Is there a way to get an appointment? To discuss something related to this with you?
@samuels3914 жыл бұрын
What if the property partitioned to sons before 2005 amendment.....?? Does daughter can ask share from her father's property...??
@Jeeva4you4 жыл бұрын
Same question I also have, did you get answer from anywhere? please do share.
@samuels3914 жыл бұрын
@@Jeeva4you of the property is partitioned before 2004 December and registered in any government documents u can't ask... In case before 2004 property was partitioned and not registered you can ask for share... Apart from that if the property was partitioned after 2004 you have all rights to ask share..
@CometFire20103 жыл бұрын
So this law is for ancestral property ONLY. Not against father who is alive for self properties.
@SiSi-ju1xk4 жыл бұрын
My father never came to see me when born because I was second daughter. Then he had a son. He wanted to give me up for adoption. Then he made me sign all property documents, without reading inside a train, to give to his Only son...
@mathivanan24062 жыл бұрын
Daughter's right entha year ku marriage anavagaluku sellum sister
@madanbagml3 жыл бұрын
Assets ok. what about dowry. Father already given dowry to daughter. For son only assets are there. Nowadays daughter are asking asset's also. WHAT ABOUT ALREADY GIVEN DOWRY STATUS.(jewels & gifted property) Now ha days laws are becoming bad. Can any explain about this......
@preethilaw3 жыл бұрын
Dowry is banned by law. Why r u still appreciating it? The point is simple, don't offer dowry for ur daughter's wedding, don't demand dowry for ur son's wedding.
@madanbagml3 жыл бұрын
@@preethilaw I am saying before 2005 act . It's was trending what happen to that. They are given DOWRY in olden days. Now only the act came. Assets have equal rights to daughter and son.. can you clarify in that. part
@preethilaw3 жыл бұрын
I purposefully didn't talk about what u asked here because I wanted my viewers to know how the law has sided towards women. Treat ur sons and daughters equally and let others treat their sons and daughters equally otherwise we will have to face this. However, I did answer that question in this video kzbin.info/www/bejne/fmPcn5qpi9Fnd6M
@madanbagml3 жыл бұрын
@@preethilaw thanks
@sakthi57092 жыл бұрын
explanation method was super akka
@sujikalki2 жыл бұрын
Clear explanation 👌 👏
@dpakk89883 жыл бұрын
Very good explanation. Thank you👍
@lakshimabala21663 жыл бұрын
Your explanation are clearly mentioned but thatha properties applicable to peran (3 sons are live) but amma thatha expired. Women property rights. Amma vaarisukku property kidaikuma mama vidam mirunthu kidaikuma mam. Please reply mam.
@lakshimabala21663 жыл бұрын
Please reply anybody else
@kanagavalli25833 жыл бұрын
Sister you are discussing many cases related .. I like your video...
@jeevaradha97894 жыл бұрын
Mam yenga appa suya sothili magal yennakku pangu kekka mudiyumma. Sattathil vali unda.pls reply pannunga mam
@rajv93993 жыл бұрын
Yes but based on documents
@hariharan-wu3py4 жыл бұрын
Hi your way of explanation is too good also your language is quite unique in the good way. Keep up the good work and God bless you
@moganapriya12564 жыл бұрын
Mam yen appa yengala vittitu poittanga he is not dead but yengaiyoo poitanga but he is alive now yenga vitla na aprm thambi rendu peru than yennaku age 17 thambi ku age 6 appa peru la land irukku but athu appa vangala appa oda father land athu ippo appo per la irukku but appa antha land oda pathiram atha aadagu vachu money vangittu Odi poitanga ippo yennaku 18 above annathu aprm na antha land la case Potta land la half share yennala vanga mudiyuma
@nithiyanandhama20883 жыл бұрын
Thank u very much
@mgrhumanityclub11113 жыл бұрын
ஒரு குடும்பத்தல் 5 பேர்கள் அதில் ஒருவர் பாகபிரிவினை வழக்கு தொடர்ந்தர் ,பாகபிரிவினை வழக்கில் 10 வருடங்கள் முடந்து judgement ஆனது அதன் பிறகு comisionnaire appointmentல் hearing வந்த போது அந்த 5 பேரில் ஒருவரை respondent called absent set exparte ஆக்கி விட்டார்கள் (judgement exparte செய்ய பட்டவருக்கு சாதகமாக வந்தது) ஆனால் comisionnaire appointmentல் hearing ல்exparte செய்யபட்டார் இதனால் exparte செய்ய பட்டவருக்கு என்ன நஷ்டங்கள்? சொத்து பிரிக்கும் பொழுது அவருக்கு உரிமை உண்டா அல்லது என்ன என்ன உரிமைகளை அவர் இழப்பார்? மீண்டும் rentry ஆக முடியுமா,? அல்லது அப்படியே விட்டு விடலமா தயவு செய்து விளக்கம் தாருங்கள் please
@SHREESARITHAA Жыл бұрын
A man acquired his ancestors property from his mother . He was married and has two daughters and one son . he left his wife and married another woman . when his first wife daughters asked share in the ancestors property he refused to give the share to them . but he is willing to give the whole property to the second wife . Is it possible to give the property to his second wife and their children ? even though the first wife daughters and are alive .
@hypercubergumi4 жыл бұрын
Daughter born before 1956 can claim property ? What is significance of retroactive in this judgement ?
@preethilaw4 жыл бұрын
Court's judgment never had retrospective effect.
@hypercubergumi4 жыл бұрын
@@preethilaw The three-judge bench also examined the retrospective application of Section 6 and ruled that daughters would get the rights from 1956 when the law came into being. However, it clarified that the newly-conferred rights through the judicial interpretations would not be available to reopen alienation of ancestral property done so earlier through existing coparceners.
@hypercubergumi4 жыл бұрын
@@preethilaw pls check 11aug judgement .. u need to learn alot
@preethilaw4 жыл бұрын
I did. Know that, Judiciary merely declares law. Judiciary can not confer "new rights" by way of judicial interpretation. Through judicial interpretation courts can only declare what's already mentioned in the Act, it can not establish new rights. Also, it is not for the judiciary but the legislature to say if an Act or an Amendment has a retrospective effect or not.
@hypercubergumi4 жыл бұрын
@@preethilaw so can you let me know if daughters born before 1956 can claim property...
@senthilrajan4522 Жыл бұрын
Nice speech
@vigneshmaddy67063 жыл бұрын
Madam ennoda grand father company le enga mummy ku equal rights iruka ??? Suyama sambariche sothu enga grand father
@rajv93993 жыл бұрын
Yes having
@DineshKumar-nn6uq3 жыл бұрын
Useful 💥
@siva73634 жыл бұрын
sis tell as about all basic lows for every problems we face in day today life so that we defend our self
@1989vijayaphysio3 жыл бұрын
What about father self acquired property daughter right equal or whatever willed only valid
@vijayasarathi75104 жыл бұрын
Good , keep rocking
@kavik85634 жыл бұрын
Hi mam.father daughter rendu pearu um death aieta.daughter oada son share vaanga mudiuma
@rajv93993 жыл бұрын
Yes but depends upon that document
@aswinsairam54834 жыл бұрын
your teaching style is awesome akka. easily understandable. please talk about arbitration and conciliation act 1996 as soon as possible akka
@SenthilKumar-hy9yi4 жыл бұрын
Good
@rameshk55534 жыл бұрын
Please let me know whether daughters should be alive on 09092005 in order to get benefited of this amendment
@amirthaversheni26914 жыл бұрын
Hi preethi, lovely video! I personally have an issue and doubts regarding this topic. Please can I contact you?
@gowthamrox32423 жыл бұрын
Akka can a girl child claim fathers property rent after her fathers death even if she has a brother????can you please answer this!!!!
@lathamanju26034 жыл бұрын
Please reply enga mamiyar 1acar land avanga appa avangalum patta panni kotuthanga antha property enga mamiyar mattum ena venumnalum pannalama illa avanga oda son daughter right iruka
@nithanilakshmi23684 жыл бұрын
Hi thanks super explains
@mgrhumanityclub11113 жыл бұрын
the defendent got faveur in judgement in a partition suit we are 6 in familly brothers and sisters and after the judgement a advocate was appointed as court commissioner to divide the suit properties as per the terms of prelimenary decree . in that IA THE defendant who got favour in judgement i 2018 was set exparte in 2021 (reason called absent set exparte) in the month of occtober 2021 , this month december i came to know about my ex parte ,i am having a advocate , is it good for me or bad for me ? what must i do to enter the case or leave as it is , must i belive in judgement ..and what is important in a suit - judgement, or prelimnary,or final decree ?
@jeyaprakash18524 жыл бұрын
எங்கள் அப்பா சுயசம்பாத்தியம் அதை எங்கள் அம்மா பெயருக்கு கிரயபத்திரம் 2007 ஆம் ஆண்டு பண்ணிட்டார் அந்த சொத்தை அம்மா சகோதர்களுக்கு2019 ல் எழுதினார் அதில் சகோதரிகள் பங்கு கேட்கலாமா ப்ளீஸ் சொல்லூங்க சகோதரி
@vijayakumarpoovar88904 жыл бұрын
சகோதரிகள் பங்கு கேட்க முடியாது. அம்மா இந்த சொத்தை யாருக்கும் கொடுக்கலாம்.
@catlover67502 жыл бұрын
What about mothers property?
@srimathibharathi36312 жыл бұрын
Wy don't you share law aplicable to Christian as well in same time
@herlinqueen21253 жыл бұрын
Son has equal right or not ... in my case father is telling all my property is only to his daughter.... he dont ready to give to son....
@yosipombossss69703 жыл бұрын
According to Hindu succession act it will b only apt for Hindus that's right. What about Christian? Since my dad died since 20 yrs ago property not splited but one of my brother in law torture my sis to give dowry as well as property. My doubt s can my mom create a will for this property to b split according to her wish? S t any possible sister? Having jealous i didn't raise this question. Since he s not at all deserve to obtain this property that's y I asked sister. Pls give hope with ur laws
@sagark93544 жыл бұрын
Daughter born before 1956 can claim the father property medam
@soniyadavid14354 жыл бұрын
Sister Christian property rights solunga please
@gunaaruna52 жыл бұрын
ஒரு பெண் 1976 ல் இறந்திருந்தாலும் அவரது தந்தை 1962ல் தனிப்பட்ட முறையில் வாங்கிய தனிச்சொத்து பாகப்பிரிவினையே இதுவரை செய்யாமல் இருந்தால் அப்பெண்ணின் வாரிசுகளுக்கு உரிமையுண்டா?
@mohanamtc76942 жыл бұрын
Very nice explanations. T.C.MOHANAM ADVOCATE Pondicherry
@preethilaw2 жыл бұрын
Thank You Sir!
@rosaram19583 жыл бұрын
This is better to follow north east rules on whole India..or.only the last female child have full right to get all properties. How is it one nation one tile This type of laws discriminating Hindus .
@lakshimabala21663 жыл бұрын
Good morning mam
@velmurugans11284 жыл бұрын
If the property of the father is self acquired and if the partition deed is registered in 2006 with daughters signature can the daughter claim equal rights in the father's property? Also kindly let me know your address with mobile number to meet you in person for more clarifications.
@thillairajesakkiappan88984 жыл бұрын
Nice
@muruganmuthusamy99763 жыл бұрын
S retroactive verdict fine
@sampaths18074 жыл бұрын
Nice video. Can father divides the ancestral property to sons leaving the daughter before 1985.
@sheelan80353 жыл бұрын
Nice Super 😍
@kumaresane81504 жыл бұрын
Super akka
@JayaKumar-vu7ws3 жыл бұрын
Ma’am, இந்த தீர்ப்புக்கு முன் மகன்களுக்கு நிலம் பிரித்து கொடுத்திருந்தால் மகள் தனக்கு சரிபாதி இடம் கேட்க உரிமை உள்ளதா? 🤔
@sathishshanmugam6843 жыл бұрын
என் தந்தை சுயமாக சம்பாதித்த சொத்தில் மகளுக்கு உரிமை இருக்கிறதா இல்லையா என்று விரிவாக எனக்கு கூறுங்கள் கூறுங்கள்
@prabhug57773 жыл бұрын
Onnume puriyala
@jeyaprakash18523 жыл бұрын
எங்கள் அப்பா சுயமாக வாங்கிய சொத்து பவர் வாங்கிய இடத்தை2007ஆம் ஆண்டு அம்மா பெயரில் எழுதினார் அப்பா இறந்த பிறகு அம்மா அதை2018ஆம் ஆண்டு மகன் களுக்கு எழுதினார் அதில் மகள்கள் பங்கு கேட்கலாமாா