Did anyone spot the mistake ar 5:45, when he said that the type 55 carries 84 vertical launch cells aft, but the caption said 48? (48 was the correct quantity)
@pauljeffs72 жыл бұрын
You are truly a hero. So glad you pointed this out instead of just watching the video like everyone else, equally as stunning as brave.
@Wow555793 жыл бұрын
1:12 this guy actually put a glock sound effect over a cannon xD
@SuperEHEC3 жыл бұрын
The .50 cal sound for ak630 and the 76.2mm Auto canon is worse to me
@maxwellmortimermontoure72743 жыл бұрын
Nah, that sounded like a sig to me.
@jules___3 жыл бұрын
😂 So misleading.
@DukeOfChirk4 жыл бұрын
The French vessel on the thumbnail looks absolutely stunning....
@alfredneuman64884 жыл бұрын
Designed to protect their fishing boats while plundering post Brexit UK waters.
@sylvainbrosseau62393 жыл бұрын
My thought exactly.
@jassimaltoki35803 жыл бұрын
@@alfredneuman6488 blame your politicians
@markknoop62833 жыл бұрын
The looks is probably the only thing that works.
@alfredneuman64883 жыл бұрын
@@jassimaltoki3580 They don't plunder the waters where I live
@jacobzimmermann594 жыл бұрын
The German MKS-180 is perhaps the most impressive overall. Special mention to the C-Sword though for the sexiest looks and intriguing tech. By the way, the French are now giving English names to their ships? Sacrebleu, what has the world come to? ;)
@brussell6394 жыл бұрын
I'd love to be able to buy the C Sword 90 and convert it into my own personal yacht. But I still want the guns left on it.
@emanym3 жыл бұрын
No way, lose those guns and put in a jacuzzi .
@thecolorteal61323 жыл бұрын
@@emanym is it too much to ask for both
@terryfreeman10183 жыл бұрын
Hey brussel639, If you get one let me know. I'll bring some beer and we will go fishing. Plus if I can shoot your guns...I'll buy you dinner. 😶🤗
@terryfreeman10183 жыл бұрын
It is a sexy booger.
@kaustshroff3814 жыл бұрын
That Type 55 is NO JOKE. It's advanced weapons systems, stealth, and capable radars make it a very formidable foe. Especially when Zumwalt is non-performing as of right now.
@aintnobodycare61932 жыл бұрын
Once the US gets the railguns or some other high-tech weaponry on the three Zumwalts, those things are going to be deadly. The Arleigh-Burke flight 3A is another thing to look at
@spartangoku76102 жыл бұрын
@@aintnobodycare6193 we canceled the rail guns, too high maintenance.
@aintnobodycare61932 жыл бұрын
@@spartangoku7610 boo
@mitchellorchard21633 жыл бұрын
Shows a newzealand flag while talking about Australia 🤦♂️
@williamhutchinson73 жыл бұрын
the flag was not NZ, we only have 4 stars
@mitchellorchard21633 жыл бұрын
@@zeromii3234 im Australian i dont need to Google it... i have one in my shed.
@tigerpjm3 жыл бұрын
@@zeromii3234 Pretty sure we know what our flag looks like champ, and it doesn't have red stars on it.
@pbrazor504 жыл бұрын
"It would be a sitting duck. . .." FIND ME A STOCK PHOTO OF A DAMNED DUCK!
@TheNefastor4 жыл бұрын
Or simply a photo of the USS Cole with a giant bomb hole in its hull... what, too soon ? :-D
@alpha54494 жыл бұрын
FREM is missing. A lot of images do not match the story telling.
@vancouverdude4 жыл бұрын
Good sense of humour with edit, "can shoot down helicopters" Marine 1, "can deal with small coastal ships", Cruise Ships
@SergeyBerezovikov4 жыл бұрын
You know that when talking about Karakurt you showed the dimensions and speed on Buyan, right? :)
@asrielthespaceshiba77234 жыл бұрын
Showing Battleship when you said 21st Century Warship Me : that's 20th Century Warship to be exact it has been built in 1943
@gumbi794 жыл бұрын
sword c90 looks the most next gen design and very good all round caps for a corvette class
@domonicmalcolm4434 жыл бұрын
So true it looks the coolest and i like how it's complement is as well as such diverse capabilities but I also like the one from Germany,
@thezorglub504 жыл бұрын
i don't know much about the design, but i can say that is not getting built. CMN isn't in a good financial state at all, and nobody ordrered a C SWORD 90 since 2014. I have doubts, maybe an african country bought some for anti piracy purposes, but i can't find any trace of it on the internet. CMN is eating dust right now, and i'm pretty sure the C sword 90 doesn't belong on the list with the others, while it does look cool.
@janvanvroonhoven32784 жыл бұрын
Even these ships will be given a run for their money ánd lives when they'll encounter ... The Flying Dutchman!
@sdsolympusmonsswsc-11524 жыл бұрын
Technically the dutchman is a frigate, so send a destroyer and its done for
@sdsolympusmonsswsc-11524 жыл бұрын
@andy zhang thats a movie, the flying dutchman was a legend for hundreds of years before the movie
@janvanvroonhoven32784 жыл бұрын
@@sdsolympusmonsswsc-1152 One small Dutch sub sank a US carrier, a cruiser, two destroyers and 3 frigates in one training mission (JTFEX / TMDI99). I'm sure the flying dutchie could deal with a random destroyer.
@janvanvroonhoven32784 жыл бұрын
@andy zhang Djeee, you actually believe in fairytal...oh wait, nvm!
@sdsolympusmonsswsc-11524 жыл бұрын
@@janvanvroonhoven3278 dude, that sub was swedish and was able to do what it did because it was old. Anyway the flying dutchman isn't actually dutch, davy Jones was scottish
@maximusmurua44374 жыл бұрын
Well the best looking one is the French Corvette; in capability they're all similar...
@nickkomen62104 жыл бұрын
I have no idea what's best. They all sound pretty dynamic in their own way in different scenarios
@tigerpjm3 жыл бұрын
"Hunter class will be built in Australia" - Shows New Zealand flag.....
@bernardsulman15063 жыл бұрын
'Yeah. I cringed too.
@cookiecola58523 жыл бұрын
What is New Zealand?
@Christopher_S4 жыл бұрын
I saw my name on the thumbnail and had to check this video out. Glad I did, there are some really great videos here.
@johnberry52754 жыл бұрын
Anything you say, Mr. C[ur]S[e]words
@AuxenceF3 жыл бұрын
Welcome to the marine nationale
@ottomaguire24434 жыл бұрын
French Corvette sounds very marketable to many other nations which maybe its real purpose not too expensive while promising to do much in compact size Operation
@marpagapal33124 жыл бұрын
It looks awesome but there are no orders for it and it is doubtfull that shipyard could built them. It probably will stay as a mere cool render.
@skizzik1214 жыл бұрын
Wait no metric? I need to know wjat the conversion for 150 sailors is in metric!!!!
@andyman86304 жыл бұрын
multiply by 1.60934
@skizzik1214 жыл бұрын
@@andyman8630 thank you!
@elias_xp953 жыл бұрын
wait, why, what? 150 sailors is 150 sailors
@meowkie85493 жыл бұрын
150 sea men
@alleweg0004 жыл бұрын
"Imagine an 8000 ton frigate that has no anti air missiles or anti sub weaponry... " Germany: "Hold my beer. Here's our Baden-Wuerttemberg class frigate.... "
@tomsmith22094 жыл бұрын
Wait for UK ships, the MOD's favourite phrase is "fitted for but not with"
@philippesoares17454 жыл бұрын
@@tomsmith2209 i heard that the new air carriers were almost defenceless. Did they get rid of some AA defence?
@bradz94134 жыл бұрын
Top marks for comparing it to the type 55 because that ship is the benchmark
@lucrolland74894 жыл бұрын
Very interesting program. The whole world is watching, so it would be nice if the measurements would be done in metric (SI).
@ylstorage70854 жыл бұрын
@ 00:21 JUST what alternative history, back into the future scene am I looking at?
@grnm27194 жыл бұрын
Could you use metric as well please. Thanks. Great video by the way.
@sdsolympusmonsswsc-11524 жыл бұрын
In navys they tend to use imperial more often than metric
@grnm27194 жыл бұрын
SDS Olympus Mons SWSC-1 Not in the rest of world navies where they have been using metric since the 20th century.
@sdsolympusmonsswsc-11524 жыл бұрын
@@grnm2719 well, in terms of weapon diameter atleast
@grnm27194 жыл бұрын
SDS Olympus Mons SWSC-1 I’m a fan of naval vessels civilian and military lots of navies used metric for armaments and vessels dimensions. Only the US navy used the imperial measurement sir. Get your facts right.
@sdsolympusmonsswsc-11524 жыл бұрын
Type 45: 4.5inch mk8 USS Arleigh burke: 5inch Mark45 Hms vanguard: BL 15 inch gun KMS Bismark:15in SK C/34 USS zumwalt: 6inch advanced gun system Kms Scharnhorst: 11inch sk c/34 These are the official names for the weapons, notice how they're all in imperial?
@aquilatempestate95274 жыл бұрын
Good to see the Type 26 getting some respect, it is something of an underrated achievement in the UK.
@marpagapal33124 жыл бұрын
Once built type 26 will be the best war vessel in the world. For now that place is occupied by the type 055.
@hujiaming61513 жыл бұрын
Hahaha, I bet Argentinians would say otherwise.
@spidermight80544 жыл бұрын
Great to see our allies developing badass ships! I’m American btw
@Triggernlfrl3 жыл бұрын
You mean vazal states because the US has no real friends any more....
@spidermight80543 жыл бұрын
@@Triggernlfrl Yes. That, unfortunately.
@wkent024 жыл бұрын
Just to clear this up for anyone wondering, the naval speeds, operational ranges, and even armaments are usually classified information. The numbers and details civilians receive are the previewed and accepted numbers that those countries' governments are willing to share with the public. Meaning with the Chinese and Russian ships, they are likely to have much faster and wider range of operations than publicly available information would say.
@paulosullivan34723 жыл бұрын
Personally I think the idea of modularity is greatly underestimated. The ability to have a ship which could swap out a damaged module for a working one and be operational again immediately is immense.
@ruliw85202 жыл бұрын
The ship in the thumbnail is the cutest thing i've ever seen
@martinmartinmartin29964 жыл бұрын
A 100 fast and tiny patrol boats can attack with missiles while avoiding the immense defenses of a modern aircraft carrier.
@flfl39694 жыл бұрын
They have smaller speed boats that can go 45 mph and fire missiles and heavy machine gun fire. These smaller speed boats are armored and one could take out dozens of speed boats. The larger ships also are able to fire massive amounts of heavy gun fire. So it is highly doubtful that a 100 enemy small boats would ever get within range to even fire one missile.
@effexon4 жыл бұрын
@@flfl3969 howabout submarines? are they still a thing or are those systems too powerful detecting and destroying subs in modern battlefield?
@flfl39694 жыл бұрын
@@effexon Submarines are by far the most deadly instrument of war in existence with the possible exception of stealth bombers. To counter this threat, carrier groups are escorted by submarines. The destroyers in the escorts also are very good and destroying enemy submarines. The sensors and various radars that carrier groups use detect threats several hundred miles away. It is very difficult for an enemy to get close enough to attack an aircraft carrier. The greatest threat are new, ultra long range missiles that are said to have a range of over 800 miles. However, these missiles are at best in development and have not been used successfully in battle. It takes multiple coordinated guidance systems to guide a missile accurately that far away.
@da-bman9194 жыл бұрын
5:47 did he say 84? As it shows 48 or am I missing something here? Just confused to what the actual numbers are for the aft tubes. Awsome vid btw!
@tomabenas9644 жыл бұрын
He accidentally said 84, but the ship only has 48 aft tubes. More in the front than in the back,
@deltavee24 жыл бұрын
@Glenn Bolger No time for retakes, let alone reloads - 48
@KorbenDalasCZ4 жыл бұрын
why you did not show Admiral Gorshkov-class frigate
@RenatoGralhoz4 жыл бұрын
The German MKS 180 is the most impressive to me. A gold mention to impressive design of French C Sword 90 and Swedish MCMV 80.
@archeopterix224 жыл бұрын
Yep, i second that thought. The idea that you can fit that thing with different mission modules,store the ones you not currently need and upgrade them with the newest tech, makes them the most versatile, cost efficient and in the long run, the ones that can be upgraded with the lowest cost to current standards.
@jbmpr4 жыл бұрын
The German is extremely underpowered... 0vls !? Check out the South Korean Sejong the great class. It's roughly the same price at 900M and it's a proper multirole platform.
@archeopterix224 жыл бұрын
@@jbmpr If memory serves me right, the Korean ship is a missile destroyer. That's not exactly multirole. The MKS is a replacement for the Brandenburg class, it's main function is ASW. And it does have an MK41 VLS that quad packs 64 ESSM. I believe, the Sejong fits twice that number of some US made interceptors.
@RenatoGralhoz4 жыл бұрын
@@jbmpr There is a dilemma today in every military forces: multirole x specialization. Its almost like JoKenPo hand game. I am trying to be easy to understand. Therefore the issue is not the money but the philosophy of each Military Forces.
@felixschrider90374 жыл бұрын
"at Osborn naval shipyard": shows picture of NZ flag
@agwhitaker4 жыл бұрын
Incredible deceptive camouflage on these 'Deadly Military Ships'. Many of them look just like old retired WWII preserved memorials and museum ships.
@chriswhited4 жыл бұрын
i'll assume you're just being sarcastic lol.
@agwhitaker4 жыл бұрын
@@chriswhited Mmmm.... a little bit. I suspect my cat could do better film editing.
@chriswhited4 жыл бұрын
@@agwhitaker then we agree.......not sure what they were thinking past just being lazy.
@glennsinclair38914 жыл бұрын
5:32 What is the KGV class battleship doing here
@Winterx693 жыл бұрын
6:35 "and, if needed, to evacuate German citizens..." - shows picture of Munich...
@bowlampar4 жыл бұрын
Packed with deadly armament is a necessity for every battle ship nowadays, so no one want to mess with you in high sea.
@stavrosstamelos68903 жыл бұрын
warship, battleships are a retired ship class
@YukariAkiyama3 жыл бұрын
Battleships are unfortunately gone 😔
@alindaderick8144 жыл бұрын
Nice got to subscribe 💪
@caseylimbert2664 жыл бұрын
26 knots, that's a bit on the slow side, isn't it?
@davidandmartinealbon31554 жыл бұрын
Just a bit... There were 1st world war battleships that could outrun that
@caseylimbert2664 жыл бұрын
@@davidandmartinealbon3155 Dreadnought could've
@heuhen4 жыл бұрын
nowadays you don't need speed, we have missiles for that, unless the ship is build for carrier escort. In the old days, you need speed, so you could catch up with you'r enemy and get your guns in range
@kevinyaucheekin13194 жыл бұрын
@@davidandmartinealbon3155 Actually no. No line of Battle Battleships of WW1 could exceed 26 kts. A few mid/late war 1 Battle crusiers could near enough but not dreadnought/Battleships.
@ryanhaggett66264 жыл бұрын
@@caseylimbert266 Dreadnought had a maximum speed of 21 knots
@cherrypoptart20014 жыл бұрын
What about the Kirov heavy class battle cruiser? There's only 1 in service but 2 more are being modernize for deployment by 2025-2030. NATO did say these ship can project more firepower than the Iowa or any battleship. I think it deserves a spotlight on this list
@heuhen4 жыл бұрын
Old.... if you notice, he say they are talking about the newest ships, that are on the drawing bord.... on side note, a single submarine like for example, the Norwegian Ula class, can easily take out Kirov.... but then Ula class was build for that, to make havoc in a fleet. Kirov's only advantage is it's size... so it can carry many weapons, it is a mobile fortress build to protect home waters with the ability to launch many missiles in a short period of time.... that size is also it biggest weakens.... The reason Kirov class and the other Russian cruisers was build big, was due to Russian (Soviet) missiles during cold war wasn't as good as western missile that could be compact. so to compensate for that, Soviet Navy build ships like the Kirov that could carry enough missiles to overrun a defense system and at least a few of those missile would get trough... But then US-Navy developed Aegis combat system with the SPY-1 radar, that have the capability to detect and track multiple targets (in the hundreds+++), and suddenly Kirov advantage was gone. There is a reason Royal Norwegian Navy use an light version of SPY-1 radar on the frigate's.... for that reason, when you have a small frigate that can detect all your 100+ missile and can engage them all within 10 seconds + - ..... suddenly a big ship like Kirov is ...pointless, and the same frigate can deploy advance stealth anti ship missile in form of NSM/JSM.... and at there are no Navy that have defense against it. When size kills you! There is a reason Russia si building only corvettes and frigates now. And are planing a future Cruiser/destroyer to replace there aging cruiser and destroyers and one day Kirov class!
@TcupsYorkiesAvailable4 жыл бұрын
You have the best videos
@admonty754 жыл бұрын
The Germany design is a great contender
@bigtony48294 жыл бұрын
Sweden is a dark horse ..They have some very nice stealth ships in the pipe line and their sub managed to " sink " a US Aircraft carrier in a naval exercise it was so quiet
@paulwallis75864 жыл бұрын
Ah... You've got a New Zealand flag with red stars, as the Aussie flag?
@Beniamin66654 жыл бұрын
Are you guys not the same.
@paulwallis75864 жыл бұрын
@@Beniamin6665 Ha, ha.
@christiancadungog94162 жыл бұрын
compact in size but dangerous, nice👍👍
@luismachado62643 жыл бұрын
The sea sword 90 corvette would be perfect for a small coastal country like Portugal. 👍
@Carolina-rd3gh2 жыл бұрын
Sim!
@odindieudetout7834 жыл бұрын
Les navires français c'est les meilleurs 🇨🇵🇨🇵🇨🇵 vive la France
@pxilant50314 жыл бұрын
Translation: French ships are the best, long live France
@S-early-user4 жыл бұрын
@@pxilant5031 American ships are the best best. But we're always ready to help out France! 🇺🇲🇫🇷
@pxilant50314 жыл бұрын
Wow I hate patriotic people stop being proud of something you never helped in creating my god
@S-early-user4 жыл бұрын
@@pxilant5031 Maybe you just have nothing to be proud of. What's this about not helping to create America? I'm an American. Nobody else does the job.
@videre88844 жыл бұрын
Sending a warship to help in a disaster makes no sense, it would be better to send disaster protection rather than a warship.
@sdsolympusmonsswsc-11524 жыл бұрын
It sends the warship because of the resources and personel it carries
@davidthomas65664 жыл бұрын
Type 26 all the way, so many different variants for one Hull.. Swap and change weapon bays for so many different missions. Yes RN...
@onecheman4 жыл бұрын
4:33 Arma 3 with mods sequence xD
@Zenigotcha4 жыл бұрын
What is that epic music piece that plays when when the Karakurt is talked about?
@StephenRayner4 жыл бұрын
I think both are great! And what’s more great is the fact that both nations are allies!
@Pax.Britannica3 жыл бұрын
3:35, why'd they flip Britain?
@Insectoid_3 жыл бұрын
Got it facing right. Because Britain is full of far right racist ding bats who think The Sun and Boris Johnson are good things. They leave the EU losing billions in trade and their freedom of movement. Strange country.
@MrTallpoppy588 ай бұрын
I think your numbers are a bit out ..... the cost of the Type 26 / Hunter Class frigates is between 5-7 $billion each. NOT $1billion.
@huseyin.fazlioglu4 жыл бұрын
excellent narration
@joesky0114 жыл бұрын
One of the clips you showed when discussing the Australian frigate, you depicted an Australian flag. Trouble is, it wasn't the Australian flag...it was the New Zealand one!!!
@allenderekdeala64574 жыл бұрын
may i know the ship class in 4:28 (any kind souls out there :) )
@heuhen4 жыл бұрын
Canadian Navy Retired: Iroquois-class destroyer: HMCS Algonquin DDG 283
@dwayneheywood34964 жыл бұрын
All of those ships have its own advantage and disadvantages unless they come into combat that the only way you could know which is the better battles ship
@mrgary1074 жыл бұрын
the ship "Poor Richard" # 6 suffered a fire for five days in San Diego Harbour. It is done and will never sail again, entire crew has been reassigned.
@spidermight80544 жыл бұрын
I sure hope these defense contractors have developed a reliable method to defend against torpedoes!
@DiscothecaImperialis4 жыл бұрын
6:34 So Germans no longer classify MKS thing as any terms like either Corvettes, Frigates, Destroyers, or Cruisers?
@davemingle67434 жыл бұрын
Nope Germans only have Motherfucking Killer Ships ;P
@marpagapal33124 жыл бұрын
They are classified by Germany as frigates but they are destroyers by American standards.
@kris220b4 жыл бұрын
Metric units please? Also, less unrelated visuals would be nice.
@ryanhaggett66264 жыл бұрын
Knots is the proper unit of measurement for seagoing vessels.
@planetnails1001804 жыл бұрын
I’m having a strange feeling like I’ve watched a commercial film...🧐as I want to buy some
@andrewheffel35654 жыл бұрын
I like it when our allies arm up. Good job UK, Aus and Canada.
@azsara77472 жыл бұрын
Can't say wich one of them is better. Every ship has it's own capabilititys and it's own purpose in order to fit with any country needs. Other countries need small vessels, fast and flexible while others need large ships in order to carry warheads.
@abhishekbabu22533 жыл бұрын
Make a video on INS Kolkata of Indian Navy or INS Visakhapatnam
@Dogeman1314 жыл бұрын
Zumwalt class destroyers: **am I a joke to you**
@Speedbird613 жыл бұрын
Decommissioned!
@Kryder4013 жыл бұрын
There is so much wrong with this video I had to make sure it wasn't produced by the Verge.
@benoitnadeau58453 жыл бұрын
Why this video does not talk about the second hand victoria class canadian submarines???🤔🤔🤔
@cashcash59953 жыл бұрын
All those Military Ships are good for bullying only , ICBM is a game changer .
@SkydivingSquid4 жыл бұрын
Interesting that they didn't include the United States' DDG 1000 series, or even a DDG Type IIA.
@Wawrzyczny803 жыл бұрын
Because the DDG 1000 program has been cancelled
@NickNZ4 жыл бұрын
So many errors in the commentary, that this has lost all credibility. Shows the NZ flag as the Australian flag. Mistakes 48 as 84, cannot correctly identify helicopters, etc, etc, etc.
@igorvyacheslavtherussianmu31424 жыл бұрын
OH SHUT UP ARMCHAIR ADMIRAL. WHAT DO U KNOW THAT WE DON'T?
@igorvyacheslavtherussianmu31424 жыл бұрын
AS FAR AS HELICOPTER IS CONCERNED, I ASSUME U ARE AUSTRALIAN AND THE HELICOPTER HE SHOWED WHILE TALKING ABOUT UR COUNTRY IS A MERLIN WHICH IS A BRITISH HELICOPTER. WHICH IS NOT THE ONE YOUR COUNTRY WILL USE, UR COUNTRY WILL USE THE AMERICAN HELICOPTER. BUT GIVEN THAT IT IS A BRITISH PROGRAMME HE SHOWED THE MERLIN MAY BE TO STRESS THAT BOTH COUNTRIES DESIGN HANGAR WILL CARRY A DIFFERENT HELICOPTER.
@hepburn1184 жыл бұрын
(slow clap) Feel better now? Where would we be without your expertise?
@benbowland4 жыл бұрын
Also showed a drawing of Russia's Poseidon autonomous nuclear torpedo and labelled it as a "Anti submarine rocket"
@bamikroket4 жыл бұрын
At least show the correct stuff in the videos while talking about it. There are so many mistakes here :P
@general_dude80253 жыл бұрын
“Anti aircraft” *shows images of WWII Japanese aircraft being downed*
@JoyMadrugada4 жыл бұрын
What about FDI Belh@ara France and Greece (in „beast „ mode ) will use it I think
@wildylupous4 жыл бұрын
The mostly could be flotilla of small vessels able to use calibr or klub missiles.
@charlesmills66214 жыл бұрын
Too many mixed incorrect pictures. For example, a French ship with U.S. service (medals) insignia.
@philippesoares17454 жыл бұрын
In fact some french ships received some US medals a few years ago.... Can't remenber wich one tho...
@charlesmills66214 жыл бұрын
@@philippesoares1745 Thanks for the info. One example is the carrier Charles DeGualle; awarded the U.S. Navy Meritorious Unit Award for the ISIS campaign.
@seenyouyt68854 жыл бұрын
Great animation
@Kainlarsen4 жыл бұрын
These are fascinating, but also worrying. The Sea Sword is a bautiful ship. They all look great, though.
@paulconnors20784 жыл бұрын
Too bad there were so many gross mistakes in this video: to include showing the Merlin helo instead of the Sikorsky MH-60R that the RAN uses or the flag of New Zealand for that of Australia. Also showing ships no longer in service such as retired USN battleships, Iroquois destroyers of the RCN (soon to be phased out completely) to name a few.
@ronjohnson16584 жыл бұрын
yes too many basic errors get it right and do your research
@peteralfredwallis84174 жыл бұрын
The German and French ships look unreaaaal
@scraggs1014 жыл бұрын
Wait.. If it's war why would you tell everyone what you are getting and what it dose?
@timothyhawkins24874 жыл бұрын
To distract you from the advanced technologies they really have it's all about deception of manipulation when it comes to the civilians of this world the technology they are showing you is by far and in fact very old for future references hope this helps.
@davemingle67434 жыл бұрын
You said it right there as I said another way 😂
@davemingle67434 жыл бұрын
@J S and USA is so broke it's runing on borrowed time you even couldn't afford a real president this time and had to hire a clown LMFAO 😂 if you yanks stop making so much trouble shut your mouths and played baseball countries wouldn't need war ships you silly twatwaffles smfh 😂
@thebikemike4 жыл бұрын
All this military equipment is to prevent wars, not to make wars. They bring democracy and development to the entire planet! Thats what they say and if you think about it... Be sceptical and enjoy live 😎
@blackblood61484 жыл бұрын
@J S thats why the EU concentrates on Multi purpose Ships they just want to Support the NATO where they are mostly just supporting american carrier groups
@DiscothecaImperialis4 жыл бұрын
So all of these warsips became smaller and smaller. a little bigger than gunboats. Does any has any form of armor plating or CHOBHAM on it or no one used that on these ships anymore?
@danp50734 жыл бұрын
1 billion each? Guess it's a good time to be a landlocked country
@frankcrawford4164 жыл бұрын
That russian cannon on their ship sounded tough. What about an American ship in this video or did I miss something.
@mikehawk36194 жыл бұрын
I was thinking the same thing, where are the American War ships?!
@kevinyaucheekin13193 жыл бұрын
The Type 26 is quiet possibly the most capable and versatile ship of its class. Pity the RN variant is lacking in ship launch ASW weaponry if its shipborne helo not operational. The Canadian and Australian variant is much more self rounded.
@bossdog14803 жыл бұрын
Why was a New Zealand flag shown while talking about the Australian Frigate?.
@MrAumbra4 жыл бұрын
Arleigh Burke not listed? Strange.
@sdsolympusmonsswsc-11524 жыл бұрын
It isnt really new, it looks more like a 70's ship than a modern one
@anubis91514 жыл бұрын
That german one looked so nice, I'm just so sad that there's so much focus on milatary and we disregard so much the devolopment of tech to aid mankind as a whole....
@2000un20004 жыл бұрын
Since the dawn of time mankind has been making technological advances through military development
@SBCBears3 жыл бұрын
Far more is spent on tech to aid mankind as a whole.
@aaronfarrin40574 жыл бұрын
I liked the look of that Saab its cool that they still make stuff I wish they made care still GM ruined that 4 everyone 😤
@davemingle67434 жыл бұрын
Saab is very much hated in NS they screwed alot of ppls lives when they closed shop and left so I guess ppl should hate GM here too ... Go FORD LOL
@adamsoderlund72504 жыл бұрын
Saab still has a role in military development they just quit making cars it was a piss hole
@drakenfire21894 жыл бұрын
Not the same company.... They split somewhere in the 90s.....
@LNZT4 жыл бұрын
Exactly
@LNZT4 жыл бұрын
Our Swedish army and general is awesome!
@curious58874 жыл бұрын
Type 055 destroyer has less range than type 26 frigate, why?
@JoaoMariaNunes4 жыл бұрын
at 10.22 loved watching the F 334 NRP Dom Francisco de Almeida firing its guns...a Dutch Karel Doorman-class frigate that Portugal bought...
@sav67324 жыл бұрын
The Type-55 looks an awful lot like a Visby class corvette....
@Puzzoozoo4 жыл бұрын
The MKS-180 has had a whole raft of problems.
@shloinskyschlachram71493 жыл бұрын
They arent launched yet. The ship class you are talking about is the f125
@kamakalle4 жыл бұрын
Perfect!
@miguelnovovillasuso4 жыл бұрын
When built, we will see if type 26 is a good ship. Until now is only a screen animation. Type 45 were the "best destroyers in the world" until they went to warn waters and its engines failed. Now, we know the type 45 cannot combat using full electrical power. So, we will see.
@vxrdrummer4 жыл бұрын
I worked on Type 26 and trust me, its heading the same way as QE and T45. I served on 2 T45s as well so I know first hand what the quality of those things is. Without the MFR, they would be worthless. Badly built in my opinion. The RNOPVs that I also worked on were beyond anything I had seen before. Falling to bits out of build and dangerous to operate. Very poor shipbuilding standards.
@glastonbury43044 жыл бұрын
Type 45 had shake down issues but all fixed
@tonyhawk944 жыл бұрын
As a French, i think the C Sword 90 would be perfect for overseas territory defense especially in the pacific. And i LOVE the German MK 180 frigate, beautiful, big and powerful. The only flaw would be that it's costly and if one is sunk then your fleet is highly affected...
@hectorazopoulos19224 жыл бұрын
please indicate metric units. I doubt the British navy or the French navy create their ships in feet and pounds. Nowadays it makes more sense to use metrics internationally. Your videos are not only seen in Texas...
@stephensalt62294 жыл бұрын
Anyone notice the ancient RCN ddh283 Iroquois cameo?
@mic75043 жыл бұрын
I was like "wait.. what is a retired ship doing here lol".