Debunking Evolution: The Traditional Catholic Perspective

[@aruljohnbosco6987]

The content presented is undeniably exceptional, a testament to the evident dedication poured into gathering essential information complemented by well-supported quotations. The intricate topic of evolution, often a source of perplexity and conflict for me in light of the book of Genesis, has been illuminated with remarkable clarity through this discussion. It has not only resolved my own doubts but has also inspired a fervent belief that all Catholics should be enlightened by this truth through proper catechesis and share this enlightenment with others. Moreover, the careful selection of individuals with the appropriate background for these discussions, all aimed at fortifying faith, is both admirable and praiseworthy. Radio Immaculata, your unwavering commitment to spreading knowledge and fostering spiritual growth is truly commendable. Rest assured, my prayers accompany you steadfastly on your journey. Ave Maria!

[@anderslvolljohansen1556]

The style makes me suspect the comment was written by AI. Did you use AI?

[@Thunderzero6]

Well said. I’ve been on the journey to learn more about creationism vs. evolution. I am happy to have come across this video and your comments. God Bless.

[@miminoppenberger8550]

Thank you so much for clarifying this information. It needs to be heard by all catholics around the world. Bless you both for the courage to proclaim the truth! Christ is King and Mary is the Immaculate Heart.

[@heidiw2458]

Such and important point about the character of God - how easy it is to get this wrong with our own limited nature and all the heresy around us. . Thank you for this beautiful talk May God have mercy on us

[@BrendanLane-c4k]

Best channel on YT

[@MummyforLife]

This is excellent. Beautifully laid out and easy to understand. I would love to have this in writen form especially to give to my children @ Friar Leo? Happy Easter! Christus rex est! ☘️🙏🏼

[@user_James_Foard]

Thank you! Many years ago I had a wonderful Catholic video on creation narrated by an old Catholic priest with a long, grey beard and a German or eastern European accent and I lost it long ago and can't find it on the internet. Part of his name was Maria in honor of Mary, and the video dealt with the process of sedimentation and also why the literal story of Adam and Eve was essential to understanding why our Lord was crucified for our sins. If you know what video I am talking about I would love to find it again. Bless you!

[@GlenGarner-m9k]

Ave Maria to all the friars and nuns up in Dundee and all down in Portsmouth.my precious child Alphonsus John Mary Ave Maria to you son Ave Maria.todays saint is st Theodora who died in the year 120.she was the sister of st Hermes and visited him while he was in jail.todays prayer is come holy spirit living in Mary help me to be better today than I was yesterday and please watch over me always.i love you mom hail Mary

[@stephendufort4154]

That was enlightening , wow! Just wish u would have cover the CCC, ?

[@39knights]

The evolutionists are constantly chanting the mantra 'we have thousands of pieces of evidence for evolution; it is a fact now.' Me: 'show me just ONE of your thousands of pieces of evidence'. Evolutionists 'ahhhh ahhhhh ahhhh............'

[@briankenome]

Exactly! Everytime I keep seeing the headline or thumbnail: " new evidence that changes thousands of years of evolution" but when you look into it, nothing new or evidential!

[@Joe-kw2qh]

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peppered_moth_evolution#:~:text=The%20evolution%20of%20the%20peppered,pollution%20during%20the%20Industrial%20Revolution.

[@39knights]

@@Joe-kw2qh That is not evidence for evolution. It is an example of variation within a species. I am of Irish/English descent. I have blonde hair. If I have a child with red-hair that would NOT be evolution, but variation within a species because of the recessed/supressed information that was in my dna all along. I would not have 'evolved' a red-headed child. True Darwinian evolution would involve the production of brand-new genetic information that was absolutely NOT PRESENT in a former generation in dormant or supressed form. If the moths had developed a pincer-claw, or porcupine-like quills to defend themselves; then that might be a good example of true evolution. But to simply be re-expressing information that was already prtesent in their DNA because a different environment triggered it; is not.

[@39knights]

@@Joe-kw2qh That is not evolution, it is variation within a species. This is an example of a moth simply re-expressing information which was supressed and not the moth developing a new ability from completely new information which wasn't there before.

[@anderslvolljohansen1556]

​@@39knightsWas the peppered moth specially created? When do you believe that creation happened?

[@mrr8915]

Darwin hated and was angry with God because his beloved daughter died and he wanted revenge against God for her loss. You can easily look this up

[@iwkaoy8758]

A lot of ate Theist hate God after finding out Santa clause was fake too. Many ate Theist said, day were heart broken about Santa clause,So day turn against God.

[@lmoelleb]

How does this affect the theory of evolution?

[@iwkaoy8758]

@@lmoelleb It does ant, but it explains why some pea pole are gullible enough two fowl four the neo darwinism belief system. Some pea pole filler information width their emo Shawn's instead of logic. Pea pole width out analytical minds are susceptible two neo darwinism. Pea pole width dialectical thinking Ken bee tricked be cause their emo Shawn's Ken control their thoughts. Isle so integrative thinkers are susceptible two neo darwinism too. Example - A land any mole two a whale. A integrative thinkers wood believe it because their minds don't dissect the any moles a gnat toe mii, and life style during each small changes. A analytical mind wood under stand at meet tea at Lee the whale Kent survive the transition because of their a gnat toe mii. Integrative wood own Lee sea the similarities between the transitions, knot the full a gnat toe mii and life style of the any mole.

[@adelinomorte7421]

***Darwin was a believer, being angry with God is a proof that he believed.***

[@lmoelleb]

@@adelinomorte7421 and why should we care what Darwin believed? Newton believed in alchemy, is that a problem for gravity?

[@GlenGarner-m9k]

Radio immacula very good.when our lady stamps on the serpents head and her heart triumphs darwin will get the smile wiped off his face.god bless you all up in Dundee and all down in Portsmouth.god bless you and mother Mary watch over you.sleep well goodnight.ave maria

[@macbride33]

🔥🔥

[@macbride33]

Read the book That Their Words May Be Used Against Them

[@przemekpawlaczyk7334]

Of course it is possible to reconcile Catholicism with evolution. Pius XII writes clearly that in this matter the sons of the Church have freedom, but they do not have it in the fact that there are only two parents. In Ludwik Ott's dogmatics published in 1952, he writes clearly that evolution could have occurred. And this textbook has been accepted and enjoys great authority

[@concretesandals4501]

Lies, lies, lies. This guy should have his PhD revoked for deceiving so many

[@gateway6827]

God bless you for this show.

[@marekkuczynski5749]

Fossils dating has identified organisms that lived millions of years ago. If so, the world has existed for millions of years. What's your take on this?

[@Ezekiel336-16]

The dating method used for fossils is wildly inconsistent because it's based on loads of unproven assumptions. The organization 'Genesis Apologetics' has a lot of good information about that, the one that I remember most being that soft, pliable tissue has been found inside of bones that are supposedly b/millions of years old.

[@ImprobableWizard]

@@Ezekiel336-16 No it's not. It is wildly consistent. The evidence for the age of the Earth is overwhelming from many disciplines. Every time this stuff is tested, the age is just calculated more accurately and precisely to the same time range.

[@Ezekiel336-16]

@@ImprobableWizard Just making a statement contrary to mine without any evidence or reference to any like I provided doesn't lend any credibility to what you're pretending is true at all.

[@ImprobableWizard]

@@Ezekiel336-16 You could look it up yourself but Wikipedia to the rescue: en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geochronology Basically using radiometric dating from Uranium isotopes onwards.

[@johncharleson8733]

@@ImprobableWizard 1) This works only if you assume a constant decay rate and initial conditions favorable to the theory. 2) Ignoring the above, the dating method was proven in cases of known age volcanic material to be absolutely false----witness recent volcanic debris dated to "millions of years old". 3) Radiometric dating, as cranky and inconsistent as it can be, is only one of several dating methods many of which point to a young earth.

[@papi5377]

Marks był jego krewnym był jego kuzynem. Tak potomek Chazarów Rotchildow Rockefellerow.

[@StJohnPaulXXIII]

No they can't 😊

[@39knights]

Why can't they? Curious.

[@StJohnPaulXXIII]

@@39knights Watch the interview!

[@39knights]

@@StJohnPaulXXIII Sorry. took your comment the wrong way. I agree the two can't be reconciled. Keep the Faith.

[@LyndseyWard-o4s]

does it not say in your holy book that the moon is a source of light , is this true ? .... if so why does it look different from day to day almost as if it were reflecting the light of the Sun

[@TheDjnatronic]

Light reflects off the moon and??? Comes back to Earth as light, so at night a full moon is a source of light

[@Ezekiel336-16]

@@TheDjnatronic Without looking it up, I'm pretty sure that Genesis calls the moon 'the lesser light' to govern the night, while the sun is 'the greater light' to govern the day. No mention of source at all.

[@ImprobableWizard]

@@Ezekiel336-16 The point is that the bible is wrong. The light comes from the same place, the Sun. The moon doesn't give off light itself.

[@dm95b]

​@@ImprobableWizardThe bible is never wrong.

[@ImprobableWizard]

@@dm95b even when it contradicts itself? Read all four of the gospels one after the other and see if you can make them for with each other.

[@user-vj9qz3br6l]

30 minutes in and all evidence to prove creationism is simply opinion from the Saints, Hierarchy of the Catholic Church, and Church Fathers. This does not refute evolution, when evolution has hard physical evidence.

[@jrobertwest52]

Can you tell me (exactly) what hard evidence? I’m not the smartest person, so if you don’t mind please keep it simple.

[@user-vj9qz3br6l]

@@jrobertwest52 Since posting this comment I have changed my mind on evolution. I have done more research. Universal common descent and chemical evolution I do believe in. Micro adaptations I believe in.

[@jrobertwest52]

@@user-vj9qz3br6l Thanks for the update. I’m on a journey (more of an aside) to learn as much as I can about where the theory of evolution stands. I want to see the best evidence without the faith claims and religious fervor that are so often imbedded, within both sides.

[@walkergarya]

Old world primates have a unique version of color vision with a unique mutation of the genes that control the development of the cones that sense the different wavelengths of light. Most mammals see the high frequency light, the blues to green and the middle, greens to yellow. About 40 million years ago the ancestor to old world primates had a gene duplication of the gene that develops the cones in the retina for greens and yellow and then there was a mutation of the duplicated gene that made the resultant cones sensitive to light at the red end of the visible spectrum. ONLY primates have this gene, we have it because we too are primates and this is a direct example of mutations adding new complexity to the genome and by tracing these genes we can trace our genetic heritage.

[@juanmanuelsanchezrodriguez6325]

Just in order to save you an hour and 30 mins of your life... this video only addresses the apparent conflict between the Revealed data and the evidence for evolution in a particular attack to the only view that seems to reconcile both, theistic evolution. It does in no particular way engage in the scientific facts for evolution, namely many branches of moderns science among which we find paleontology, genetics, cosmology and geology... they say just one thing about geology, to be honest. Evolution comes up uncontested as a scientific fact after this video, and since it only points to the conflict between our faith and a scientific fact that they do not envolve with... our faith ends up being a fable that contradicts scientific facts... in order to be a Catholic in good stance you would have to be pretty much a dumb anti-scientific, which ends up leading many to athiesm. Also, this does only address Magisterial documents prior to evolutionary discoveries and exaggerates its Magisterial weigh, lifting to dogmas things that on their own do not contain a condemnation of the denial of the proposition, which is what a dogma is, when at the same time leaves out of the frame other Church claims that approach much more to the Evolution.

[@briankenome]

Thanks for the heads up but I'd rather watch the whole thing for myself instead

[@olteanualex4689]

Yep...just wasted one and a half hours to hear how others didn't approve of one thing or the other. No scientific discovery disputed whatsoever.

[@RadioImmaculata]

Ave Maria! The second part of this video where we discuss the so-called evidence for evolution from a scientific angle can be found here. God bless you. kzbin.info/www/bejne/emrdfWCcbdGGkM0&lc=Ugyh9I68JyS8_MQKIjZ4AaABAg

[@mariahumphrey9897]

Evolution .....No Evidence ...just a second rate belief system with no saviour. Except perhaps Darwin who disproved himself😅😅😅

[@APRENDERDESENHANDO]

@@RadioImmaculata As a non christian, I'm really curious about your faith. Isn't lying a sin? Isn't bearing false witness against the 8th commandment? If this is indeed the case, why is the internet full of christians lying about science and evolution?

[@julzee111]

And here lies and he lies the problem with belonging and depending on a cult to make your decisions for you. And then you say you’re looking to mother Mary to give you the answers? Good God they have your heads twisted so far from the truth that you wouldn’t know it if you saw it.

[@Sahuayoc8490]

Should we apply the same to your own reasoning?, I believe you’re way of reasoning is what make me believe that you really drank the cool aid of who whispered in you’re self as to think (believe) that your independent of any previous biased way of thinking, you must inquire in what is subjectivism and object reality as to analyze what I’m here telling you, thanks for solidifying my understanding of the human soul, you’re the perfect example to prove my position. You must think that you are a product of you’re own self or that can exist with nothing else, right what are you claiming self subsistence in aeternum? You’re own mentality is based not on self but on other deceptive assumptions from old, let’s keep humbling our selves by accepting the way to get to His WAY and make it shall we?

[@ImprobableWizard]

@@Sahuayoc8490 The difference is evidence. Religion does not have any evidence on its side. It has to invoke belief which is accepting something with no evidence. It's actually seen as a plus if you can do this. Atheists look to the evidence only and change what they accept with better evidence. And that evidence is independent and is the same for everyone.

[@Sahuayoc8490]

@@ImprobableWizard I disagree the evidence? Of what? Phenomena that science is unable to understand because of the secuencial change this is determined by nature and opposes “chance” that is what determined or specificity, there are principals that evolutionists ignore (willingly or deficiency in observation?) nature is very determined, that is observation and data that only by ignoring of true observation goes inadvertently, “no thing can give what it lacks” no one can give what it does not have, that’s a principle of proportionality that is impose by nature, Modern science with objective and realistic moderate Philosophy has no claim other than advance blindly, perhaps is because true scientists contemplate in an Inteligent Necesary Being that is Unmoved and has for His Necessity of His Goodness. Modern science requires faith also because of its dishonesty and absurd claims that contradicts itself, not so if seen objectively and with intellectual honesty.

[@matthewmascarenas6307]

Honestly, I don't understand why people who vehemently believe evolution do not just outright reject the Catholic faith? If one truly believes in evolution, that's fine, but why taint the Catholic faith with that wicked disgusting, nonsense. Why not take that wicked disgusting nonsense blend it with the proper secular, godless, aethiestic, humanist viewpoint and leave it at that? What's the purpose of trying to blend evolution with the Catholic faith? Fundamentally it sure seems as though Evolution is the basis of an entirely different faith so why not just take belief in that faith and at least leave Catholicism alone untainted?

[@Ezekiel336-16]

Because evolution comes from the occult, which means the dEVIL, and hE wants EVERYTHING to fALL with hIM.

[@ImprobableWizard]

Because they have been indoctrinated into having to believe it through their ancestors. If you accept science, then the obvious thing to do is reject religion, but that goes against everything you've been told since birth and your social groups. Pretty difficult! The usual defence it to find some way to reconcile the two. Have a look at any of the videos of people that have tried to leave orthodox Judaism, Mormonism, or Amish. It's really hard. You get shunned.

[@diongoi8765]

Rejecting evolution is silly, but young earth creation is hilariously stupid. Are you flat earth too? What about lizard people?

[@LyndseyWard-o4s]

a ghost told you the truth about evolution , I have my doubts about the veracity of that ... maybe you did see a ghost but do you have any proof ?

[@luish1498]

the only thing in this video is the person doesnt know what evolution is

[@TheDjnatronic]

Evolution states we used to be fish but now launch rockets 🚀….Fish to Rockets 🚀

[@luish1498]

@@TheDjnatronic by we evolution means our ancestors. cladistic humans are fish. if you want to know what evolution states try understand first what is evolution.

[@TheDjnatronic]

@@luish1498why are evolutionists running away from Abiogenesis and Macro Evolution?

[@luish1498]

@@TheDjnatronic «evolutionists « are not running away from abiogenesis or macro evolution . creationists are the ones that dont like the answers that scientist give to them about that topics. there is no «micro or macro« evolution just evolution. macro evolution is a term that creationist love to misrepresent, macro is just the sum of many micros. «macro evolution« relates to evolution that occurs at a level above species (speciation). evolution -> Evolution is the change in heritable traits of populations over successive generations. abiogenesis -> life origin abiogenesis nothing to do with evolution. Now since i know what you are doing ( and asking) you gonna said that to have evolution you need first abiogenesis. abiogenesis and evolution are different fields.

[@bigbearn1383]

So. I suppose you believe in punctuated equilibrium because they can't find the necessary transional fossils . So, explain scientifically this hypothesis when you don't have the fossils to even make sense of it.

[@LyndseyWard-o4s]

I read it in a book written a long time ago therefore it must be true ? .... good luck with that

[@Ezekiel336-16]

I read it in a book that was produced recently so it must be true? ... good luck with that as well. It won't come.

[@LyndseyWard-o4s]

how do you reconcile your beliefs with Hindus and Sikhs and Muslims and Buddhists ....

[@ImprobableWizard]

You can't. Either one of them or none of them are true. If you can't choose, then why choose: come to the natural conclusion that religion is manmade and all should be rejected.

[@LyndseyWard-o4s]

for those we are about to deceive may the lord send us the just reward amen ....

[@LyndseyWard-o4s]

humans are still Apes , we have a common ancestor with the extant apes ....

[@Ezekiel336-16]

Nope, human beings were created in the image and likeness of the Lord God, not animals. We also have a lot less in common, DNA-wise, then you've been told. Look into the organization 'Genesis Apologetics' for a lot of good information about that, especially their work debunking the lies about "Lucy".

[@dianneraimondi8382]

Not close genetic similarity//WRONG!!

[@LyndseyWard-o4s]

you want to believe in your god and holy book so much , it is slightly worrying ....LLAP

[@Ezekiel336-16]

Worrying because you're on the wrong side and not living in the everlasting blessings of life in the Kingdom of Heaven with Jesus and His family of faithful followers yet?

[@LyndseyWard-o4s]

reject science because it makes our bible look illogical, don't whatever you do appreciate progress and understand the world around us better than we did two thousand years ago , that would be very very silly indeed

[@Ezekiel336-16]

True Science doesn't dishonestly present unproven assumptions and philosophies as facts. The "science" you believe in is based on those things, which makes it pseudo-science not science.

[@LyndseyWard-o4s]

do you believe in fossil fuels ? ....

[@walkergarya]

It is quite simple. Biological Evolution is reality. The Theory of Evolution is our explanation of Biological Evolution. The dogma of the Catholic Church cannot change reality.

[@macbride33]

Ye do err not knowing the Scriptures nor the power of God

[@LyndseyWard-o4s]

cherry picking partial quotes is deception and no true Christian would misrepresent another ...

[@markanthonymonsanto3693]

Pope Francis, accepted evolution.

[@Ezekiel336-16]

And that's supposed to influence any faithful follower of Jesus Christ as their Lord and Savior?

[@bigbearn1383]

It was not an excathedra statement nor an encyclical.

[@Sa-qb1ln]

You r NOT to worship mary she is NOT God she is a HUMAN and not God. GOD the Father God the Son God the Holly Spirit

[@dianneraimondi8382]

Let me clue you in////Im Catholic ,I don't worship Mary! I worship the blessed Trinity! I love the Mother of God and Honor her andAsk her interssesion,which God wishes. Jesus honors his mother, She is the queen of Heaven. You dishonor Jesus when YOU dishonor his mother!!!!!!!!!

[@julzee111]

No human being is infallible. Therefore, I can assure you that the Bible is not the infallible word of God and I can guarantee you that your pope is far. I’m telling you from infallible. Christ leaves it up to each one of us to develop a relationship with him in order to gain our insight and knowledge through his scriptures, understanding that when we understand his nature, we test that against the scriptures to verify the truth, and we use discernment that is given through the Holy Spirit. Quit depending on salable human beings to spoonfeed your relationship with Christ and most certainly don’t depend on a demonic spirit appearing as the Virgin Mary to feed you, your belief system. It’s time to grow up and understand that you have been lied to by your cult. Trust me there will come a time when you’re asked to drink the Kool-Aid. What are you going to do?

[@Ezekiel336-16]

You start by saying that the Bible is not the inerrant word of the Lord, and then go onto say the Scriptures are supposed to be used to verify and discern the truth while having a relationship with Jesus Christ as our Lord and Savior. That's inconsistent and untenable.

[@dianneraimondi8382]

the Bible is infallible because it his the word of Godthe Holy Spirit who inspires the biblical writers. God is infallible!!

[@julzee111]

@@dianneraimondi8382 No. Jesus Christ is the Word Of God. The Bible is. Book written by the inspiration of God. If the Bible were infallible, people wud worship it. Oh yeah - they do. An when u say the Bible is infallible- which Bible are u referring to??

[@dianneraimondi8382]

@@julzee111 the Bible IS the word of God thru the Holy Spirit. Jesus is the incarnate Word of God sent by God the Father. All persons of the Blessed Trinity are equally God. We don't worship the Bible. We worship the one God that wrote it!

[@julzee111]

@@dianneraimondi8382 And the Word became flesh and dwelt among us, and we have seen his glory, glory as of the only Son from the Father, full of grace and truth. The Bibe is a record of historical events that include some of the Spoken words of Jesus Christ and inspired by the HS. BUT it is not the inerrant word of God. in fact, the earliest copies of the Bible differ there are mistakes. So how do you explain a book that is supposed to contain no errors clearly containing mistakes?

[@papi5377]

Kosmos vrotchildow trumpow