The Ohio Supreme Court ruled Thursday that firing warning shots can be considered "self-defense," giving a win to gun rights advocates.
Пікірлер: 9
@user-iv2xb9yz5l3 ай бұрын
The political leanings of the judges shouldn't have anything to do with such a decision when it comes to the legal obligation of respecting our right to defend ourselves. And, cities and townships shouldn't be allowed to press charges for discharging a firearm upon defending ourselves.
@fzz1883 ай бұрын
We dont want to make it to easy for victims to defend themself because it can open the door for criminals to take advantage of the law. If that is the case then why do we have qualified immunity for police officers isnt that allowing bad officers to take advantage of the law?
@rayc.13963 ай бұрын
With the cost of ammunition in this era, don't expect a warning shot.
@JF238xLearning3 ай бұрын
The smart gun owners understand their responsibility and rights of having a firearm and when to use it in necessary situations to protect themselves and their loved ones from danger.
@mikeconley95903 ай бұрын
Too bad "smart" isn't a qualification for owning a gun.
@LadieKadie3 ай бұрын
Good decision.
@borregoayudando14813 ай бұрын
im pro gun can we discuss why it's good? seems like a dangerous legal precedent
@mudzombie2163 ай бұрын
common sense aint so common. I would state more facts in this comment but cannot in fear of being censored