Part 2: Noam Chomsky on Climate Change, Nukes, Syria, WikiLeaks & More

[@rustyjohnson5018]

I love Chomsky's analysis of the MOAB drop.

[@p.brooksmcginnis1749]

No More War

[@p.brooksmcginnis1749]

Revolution

[@jpol3808]

Blocking video playing again when people have paid contacts and could sue.

[@joshsellers5724]

""Take care of them". That defeats the purpose of the US genocidal efforts.

[@aDarcone]

'genocidal efforts' ..explain it to me

[@joshsellers5724]

aDarcone Where are they going to go? They have no future. It seems the usual suspects have massive infrastructure plans for the country's that came from the British mandate. Have you ever heard of these pipeline plans through Syria? The European oil market is going to make some very deplorable people very rich. 80% of the newborns in Iraq are born with serious birth defects from all the depleted uranium that was used. I'm sure that they used even worse illegal shit over there.

[@aDarcone]

of course i did ..i live in germany ..some good sources left here ^^

[@aDarcone]

but u still missed to expl me the 'planned genocide' stuff

[@joshsellers5724]

aDarcone It's natural gas, I guess. Russia isn't going to let them cut into there monopoly on the natural gas to europe. It's just sick when you see what's under the veneer. Bringing people to Europe from country's our governments just bombed out is crazy.

[@oneeyedmonster9827]

Chomsky wrong on Syria being responsible on chemical attacks. Too dismissive for my taste. White helmets did the attack. That's where there is NO question.

[@rustyjohnson5018]

OneEyedMonster I heard him say that it was hard to see why Assad would launch such an attack while his army was winning.

[@aDarcone]

jup ..never said such thin

[@AWildBard]

He was stating the obviously flawed position that was parroted by the administration as grounds for retaliation. The position wasn't seriously questioned in the media. After he stated the position, he pointed out some major flaws in the position, mainly, why would Assad do something desperate when he had won the war?

[@Wisdomabovegold]

+AWildBard Trump can only say so much to the public. He cannot expose the CIA for what it really is but the bottomline is that the planes he took out were mercenary-operated. These were mercenaries originally hired by al-Assad to war against ISIS but then given a better deal to join ISIS. Trump did not hold a 'flawed position' but was compelled to walk a thin line when communicating with the American people. Look at how he has had to war against the deep state as it is. What do you think would happen to him if he spilled the beans on every detail?

[@dickhamilton3517]

there was no 'attack'. White helmets invented the 'attack' and falsified the circumstances of 'treatment' after the so-called attack, while the people who were in the clinic were actually affected by a fire and consequent smoke inhalation. Medical staff who were already treating the people prior to the arrival of the White Helmets reported on this.

[@kelsosunshine3400]

Amy you get too hung up on superficial details like his bumbling ramblings things cnn would cover as breaking news. please don't waste your time with fluff details and you'll have more time to focus on the real problematic things he says and does.