Please click the link to watch our other Weapon Detective videos kzbin.info/aero/PLEMWqyRZP_LrdqB-XbqY2LocUVEaG_w7D Please click the link to watch our other South African Systems videos kzbin.info/aero/PLEMWqyRZP_LrpqXkSssa-WtAgH3DzItDD Please click the link to watch our other Weapon Detective-Air videos kzbin.info/aero/PLEMWqyRZP_LrGyENf3nqsYKC9ZkWH414k
@ansonellis4439 ай бұрын
Could you do the kozak and novator from ukraine
@georgedoolittle90159 ай бұрын
Almost identical to the "euro-copter Tiger" 🐅🐅🐅🐅🐆 🐯🐯🐯 so possible sees a return as the system is already in production in Europe so could move some of that production to South Africa. I think only ten of these were ever made but maybe that's an Intel thing. Would be very much in demand against Russia in Ukraine tho, absolutely and after that who knows where else. Just needs to be "stood up."
@domainmojo21629 ай бұрын
Namibian here.. South Africa didn't lose the war. The war ran its course due to geopolitical factors. The SADF was a force to be reckoned with- and I'm saying this as someone from the opposing side. Highly structured, organized and disciplined- to a man, excellent communication and technology- and they were totally goal/objective-oriented. The current government? A total and abject failure! Few governments in human history can claim to be as incompetent as the ANC. A mom-and-pop store is more organized and efficient!
@mariuscarelse24708 ай бұрын
Thanks dude. As ex SADF we appreciate this. We found in PLAN formidable opponents regardless of their hardships. But I do not know of one ANC's MK who was actively involved in a single battle. The likes of Zuma and Hani were to busy persecuting their own. Read the book Inside Quatro. When the author complained about camp life in Angola he was threatened with death. The ANC was better at mining farm roads to kill women and children or bombing public businesses. Cowardly as they still are today. Yet they call themselves Veterans and get the benefits for that.
@detdet38717 ай бұрын
yes it was geo political and financial.
@Jacquobite7 ай бұрын
I spoke to one of the SA medics who told of a horror story of the morgue/field-hospital filled to ankle level with blood (an exaggeration I'm sure). Massive PTSD. You can't win anything when murdering people and the opponents murdering your friends.
@TheSwanepoelmj5 ай бұрын
@@mariuscarelse2470 Fok my. Dit maak nou alles sin
@joecruiser9 ай бұрын
The defence company is state owned. The ANC govt is too incompetent to achieve Anything. The skills have already fled Denel.
@tim89389 ай бұрын
think Rheinmetall owns half of Denel
@joecruiser9 ай бұрын
@@tim8938 Only the RDM Business in WC. Munitions only. The rest is still under ANC control...... and obviously went to the dogs.
@user-jr2ue9nu6y9 ай бұрын
@@tim8938 Likely ANC is the BEE majority share holder.
@m135i.9 ай бұрын
My father and many of his colleagues worked on the Rooivalk at 16 squadron and then at Denel. Denel is a shit show now so most of them have left
@joecruiser9 ай бұрын
@@m135i. Indeed. The entire Denel is beyond broken and FUBAR. 🤣
@Israeliet7773 ай бұрын
My father worked at Atlas now Denel. He made the Cheetah engines, G6 and G5 parts and the drones. Also the rooikat. Later he started his own engineering business and made the parts from there. He would have been 94 years old now if still alive. The old men new how to work precise and and deliver top quality job.
@jeffnic31169 ай бұрын
Once again, I hear South Africa was losing the war @3:18. Really? Look at what happened during that period, the SADF pushed the communist attack back to where they started their invasion with heavy losses. An East German said to me "South African Army, very very good", referring to the last Angolan battle. As for Rooivalk, I love to see it make a comeback and get an export order. Who are the ANC wiling to sell it to, and who will they not sell it to is a good question? Allegiance or money?
@shadipaul9 ай бұрын
ANC has really destroyed your country
@m135i.9 ай бұрын
Not even a handful of them are still operational, we can forget about the rooivalk making a comeback
@m135i.9 ай бұрын
Also i believe the airframe jigs at denel are ruined
@jeffnic31169 ай бұрын
@@m135i. Not surprised to hear that with what is going on in the SANDF. Forget the incapable government that does not understand business, the only way is with a private adventure, as in how Lockheed, Boeing, Airbus operate, will require a huge investment. First it will require an investor who sees potential to develop the existing system, don't hold your breath.
@roystewart43868 ай бұрын
Denel and Armskor suffered the same situation as EsKom, SA Airways SA Post Office and other State owned corporations. ANC stands for “Another Naughty Crook” Corruption at its worst.
@Homoprimatesapiens9 ай бұрын
The reason for not selling Rooivalk choppers is 100% the incompetence of our government to support the marketing of it.
@Homoprimatesapiens9 ай бұрын
@@Richard-tq7xi so the US is the big chief in charge of NATO. It begin to make sense to establish an aliance such as BRICS.
@ropsyso69409 ай бұрын
And the less well known or admitted fact is the stolen IP from the US by SA during the sanctions against SA for the Rooivalk😢
@mybru19 ай бұрын
Brucs is economic you ifiot not military. The reason why it was blocked is because several nato countries use the exact same engine@@Homoprimatesapiens
@truth-Hurts3758 ай бұрын
Nothing to do with the ANC goverment....Rooivalk was developt and buildt under Apartheid and even at that time....they couldt sell it...not even the Israelis are using it which were a very close ally to the Apartheid regime....what does tells you ?????
@cromagnumveritas42097 ай бұрын
Not true , they sold the Blueprints to Turkey & China. They are producing Homogenised Rooivalks class as Light attack Helicopters
@danielkemp48609 ай бұрын
Thank you, from a South African, for saying Rooivalk correctly 🙏
@cccmmm12349 ай бұрын
Pity he can't say Denel correctly though.
@maarten_notjustagrip8 ай бұрын
@@cccmmm1234 or ORYX
@thenomad479 ай бұрын
Correction: South Africa didn't lose the war. It ended in a draw as no side was able to achieve their strategic objectives.
@dewetmaartens3599 ай бұрын
Yes. We handed our military over fully intact.
@John.S.Patton9 ай бұрын
What was each side's goal?
@Ghoulza9 ай бұрын
@@John.S.Patton SA wanted to stop Soviet expansion and kick Cuba out of Angola. Cuba and the Soviets wanted the minerals of Angola and wanted to have a puppet government they could control. at the start, Cuba's goals were to kick SA out and ddestoy UNITA, SA wanted Cuba out and UNITA intact. in the end both SA and Cuba agreed to leave and UNITA remained intact so SA won
@jamesflores44399 ай бұрын
You lose men and resources and gain nothing it means you lose😂.
@thenomad479 ай бұрын
@@jamesflores4439 The Cubans and Soviets lost men and resources and the collapsed and Cuba lost men and resources and just got kicked out back to their island, the South Africans pulled back and out of Angola to deal with ending Apartheid, and Angola just continued their civil war after a brief peace but this time without foreign interference. Neither side won.
@scottrobinson32819 ай бұрын
As a number of other commenters have stated, South Africa did not "lose" the war. It was rather the tectonic shift that was taking place in geopolitics in the late 1980's that brought the war to an end. If one person could be said to be responsible for the war's end, it was Mikhail Sergeyevich Gorbachev. So much had the world changed, that South Africa cooperated with the USSR in the late 1980's on a project to re-engine the Mirage F.1 with the Klimov RD-33 turbofan. Its new designation was SMR 95. The full story can be found in the 11/94 edition of Military Technology -"The South African Crossing Of The Iron Curtain". The Rooivalk was a remarkable achievement for a small country with very little history of aircraft construction, proof that sanctions do not work. The old SA saying applies - "'n Boer maak "n plan". (Lit. "a farmer makes a plan").
@truth-Hurts3758 ай бұрын
Ha fucking ha !!!!
@maarten_notjustagrip8 ай бұрын
Finally! Someone else who knows about the SMR 95 project. I have held a photograph of 60Sqn's 707 tanker refueling that F1 with Volgograd below. My mate Eddie was there for 8 years in the 80s' at Atlas. I was told that a South African crew flew that F1 at the Moscow Airshow every year (back then).
@detdet38717 ай бұрын
did not know this about working with USSR on the engines.doesnt make sense,why would commies help to improve the ''enemy''?
@maarten_notjustagrip7 ай бұрын
@@detdet3871 because we weren't "the enemy". It just needed to appear so.
@phelansa239 ай бұрын
At 3:19 in your video “It became clear that South Africa was loosing the war”. That is a massive statement. It certainly wasn’t clear to us on the ground fighting the war. Other than that, I enjoyed your video.
@scottrobinson32819 ай бұрын
I have a video of Pik Botha recounting a discussion he had with a Cuban negotiator, who threatened to send another 15 000 troops to Angola. Pik said: "fine, we will send another 1 000 troops". The Cuban became apoplectic. Pik then told him that SA never had more than 3 000 troops in Angola at any one time.
@paulD19849 ай бұрын
South Africa didn't lose the war as you suggested! In short, politics won the day although militarily, the Angolans along with the Cubans, Russians etc., were outmatched and outgunned by their own admission...
@dougerrohmer9 ай бұрын
Sorry maat, but we quit at the exact right time. We lost air supremacy, and the next fight would have been bad. And we didn't have a hope of regaining air supremacy, despite what the SAUK told us about the Cheetah and Kukri and helmet mounted sights and all that kak.
@paulD19849 ай бұрын
@@dougerrohmer I'd have given you a listening chance but your crude language says it all...
@dougerrohmer9 ай бұрын
@@paulD1984 Crude language? Where did you go to school? A convent?
@Ghoulza9 ай бұрын
@@dougerrohmer we didn't quit all our goals had been met, our main goal was for Cuba to leave Angola and they did. Also, we never had air supremacy at any point in the war. to this day West point in the USA studies the bush war to so how a light mobile army without air supremacy can win a conventional war.
@dougerrohmer9 ай бұрын
@@Ghoulza The Cubans said they'd leave when we said we would leave. They didn't, we did. We had air supremacy all the way from Ops Savannah until the Mig 23 with all aspect missiles came along. And I'm not so sure whether the Yanks give a hoot about our little war.
@habahan42579 ай бұрын
Cool video with an interesting analysis. As a Turkish, the Rooivalk might be a better preference for us. It was better and absolutely more beautiful than the A129. We have already changed the A129's engine, so we could also change the Rooivalk's engine.
@maarten_notjustagrip8 ай бұрын
You dont need to. Those Mikilas are great.
@habahan42578 ай бұрын
@@maarten_notjustagrip Turkey eliminated the Rooivalk because France declared it would not permit the engine's license production.
@maarten_notjustagrip8 ай бұрын
@@habahan4257 Ah ok. In that sense, an engine change could have been a solution, yes.
@bombfog19 ай бұрын
It’s a shame that South Africa became a Third World country because they had a mighty, dynamic and innovative military industrial complex for an otherwise small country (not unlike Israel).
@zainday71739 ай бұрын
Blame those ANC corrupt assholes
@wayne9758 ай бұрын
We not all dead and gone...
@InstigatorDJ8 ай бұрын
Even had nukes.
@InstigatorDJ8 ай бұрын
@@wayne975 Yeah we are. Our military is a joke. We literally couldn't fight a war currently.
@michaelmeinel78173 ай бұрын
had is very appropriate - no idea how to market - is the answer i.e. G5/G6 still are excellent weapons and with upgrades would pick up a shedload of orders (only a few middle eastern countries i.e. Iraq) bought it. was killed by politics
@redbaron90299 ай бұрын
Looks better than apache.
@einundsiebenziger54889 ай бұрын
Except for the Mil-28 which was specifically designed to beat the Apache in ugliness, every attack helicopter looks better than the Apache😉.
@chaosXP3RT9 ай бұрын
Wrong
@TailEndCharlie-fi9gd9 ай бұрын
Wrong
@maarten_notjustagrip8 ай бұрын
Does everything better than an Apache with a fraction of the radar signature. Apaches are OLD.
@Daud765 ай бұрын
This fine piece of military hardware should never have been sold and technology within it shared. My late father worked on the retina guidance system back in the day and I have fond memories of him bringing the helmet home to make some adjustments as well as showing my brother and myself. Having said that, the then SADF never lost any war with anyone. We were proud and we were strong. My respect to all soldiers who served their country.
@totenkopf14799 ай бұрын
South Africa wasn't losing the war
@PoseidonDiver9 ай бұрын
They were, not on the front line, but on the home front. The war was incredibly unpopular. With people like my father conscripted as a commando for nearly 10 years in that war!!! A war no one had any say in fighting. RSA was losing politically... plus the interference from Executive Outcomes (EO) and Sandline International screwed us.
@totenkopf14799 ай бұрын
@@PoseidonDiver losing a war politically and militarily are two different things. My father fought in the war and still says it was one the best time of his life. In general wars fought with conscription armies on foreign soil are unpopular, but the Border war was not not an especially unpopular war. From what I read in Jan Braleytenbach's book it was the politicians who didnt have the stomach for it.
@robert-trading-as-Bob699 ай бұрын
@@totenkopf1479I served in the SADF, and hardly anyone WANTED to go to the Border... so that makes it unpopular as far as the troepies were concerned. The beer (when you got some) was warm, the heat was blistering, the sand got into EVERYTHING, your vehicle got hot enough to burn you, and the locals were prone to shoot at you... Then there were the rat packs... the curried fish dissappeared first, normally thrown away, or at someone who pissed you off. (If you lit a fuel tablet under an unopened tin, the can would explode, leaving a seriously bad smell that lingered for days. Bio-warfare at it's most basic!) The rivers had crocs in them, so a relaxing swim meant taking a big chance with your life. On the upside, you got danger pay which made the little they gave us stretch a little further, but there was hardly anything to buy up there until you got back to the states, then it dissappeared on jols very quickly. Yeah, Army life was lekker: Free clothing, accommodations, hiking and shooting for just two years of your life. (Excluding Camps)
@PoseidonDiver9 ай бұрын
@@totenkopf1479 He was clearly Afrikaans and not a Soutie like my dad. No matter how hard I try and picture it, I can't see being forced by conscription to fight a political war in the Commandos for close to a decade. I guess the millage varied drastically depending on ones culture. The stories my father has told me, the friends he lost and the personal sacrifices made, only for all that fighting and loss of life completely futile in the 94 elections, puts that war in a very different light for me. I will agree with you that people did support the war based on fighting communism from spreading into RSA, but there was a strong opposition to what was effectively known as 'South Africa's Vietnam' - a fitting comparison. If you are going to use books written by Jan Breytenbach as a reference, obviously it will cast the war in a positive light... He was the commander of the very same commando unit my father fought in. Try Michael Drewett's paper titled 'Battling over Borders: Narratives of Resistance to the South African Border War Voiced through Popular Music' for a less biased perspective on the social narrative at the time.
@Leec_19729 ай бұрын
@@PoseidonDiver Woah, EO was active in Angola several years after the war ended Sandline was never involved in Angola and neither screwd us up. I am not sure where you are getting your information from. It was actually not universally unpopular. It was considered necessary and even though we did not really wantto be called-up the vast majority went and did a sterling job.
@bloodgripen22579 ай бұрын
I live in Soweto here in South Africa🇿🇦, and whenever I get the chance to go to an airshow, the Rooivalk is always gonna be there. I absolutely love just how DIFFERENT it sounds from every other helicopter (Oryx, A109, Bk 117, the various helicopters used by the police and medical services, etc), it sounds like an absolute MENACE and I love it 😎 Plus when you look at it from a frontal perspective whule it flies, it genuinely looks like a wasp. Kinda terrifying. Plus its absolutely huge!
@cosmoray97509 ай бұрын
Aesthetic tourist village kzbin.info/www/bejne/g3bLdqmLapd5e5Y
@Leec_19729 ай бұрын
It's strange that you notice the different sound even to the Oryx considering it uses the same engine. I must say I have never noticed that myself at airshows. Will def listen out next time.
@bloodgripen22579 ай бұрын
@@Leec_1972 You do that man. It really is quite noticable 😎
@kepalie76629 ай бұрын
You should attend AAD 2024 Absolutely amazing airshow. Most of our aircrafts are on display together with a few other countries. The previous show had the American Blackhawks.
@bloodgripen22579 ай бұрын
@@kepalie7662 AAD2024 is on my radar (along with Museum Air Show 2024). I was also there back in AAD 2022, and it was amazing 🤩 seeing helicopters refueling in KZbin videos is cool, but seeing it with your own eyes (even if it was just a display) was something else entirely. Plus it was my first time seeing a Blackhawk with my own eyes, and that was a treat.
@stephaniejooste38799 ай бұрын
My husband and I both worked at Denel and we both worked on the Rooivalk. There are nobody left but a literally hand full of people and can't do anything anymore. The Rooivalk is a wonderful aircraft and we all felt like it was our baby. The SOUTH AFRICANS did BOT LOOSE the war, there was a negotiated peace deal and Namibia was then formed. Don't comment if you don't know about something. The Rooivalk will never be returned to Manufacturing because there is no way it can compete with the high capacity assembly like the Apache.
@juglansregia14338 ай бұрын
RIP to competence and the good old days, thank you for the service...i wish there were more people like you but 🤷
@Goblynn-s5l8 ай бұрын
u were in angola to stop it from being used as a base by SWAPO THEREFORE LOSING NAMIBIA MEANS U LITERALLY LOST the level if delusion amongst u boers should be expected though U LITERALLY THOUGHT SURRENDERING UR COUNTRY TO THE ANC Would somehow make you accepted by the Europeans, but they know your creoleS and so won’t even let you in their countries😂😂😂😂😂😂 Keep telling yourself you want though all the lights and electricity are off for about 18 hours a day down there😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
@ebie978 ай бұрын
Was the apache not designed around the rooivalk and just updated?
@maarten_notjustagrip7 ай бұрын
@@ebie97 no. The Apache predates the Rooivalk by at least a decade.
@mudgie34459 ай бұрын
South Africa wasn't losing the war. We were being pressured politically. It was a political loss. Not a military loss.
@craigbritz1684Күн бұрын
You forgot to mention we also got sold out by our freemason leaders. FW De Klerk &co.
@Lasenggo9 ай бұрын
Beautiful aircraft but sadly there's really no reason for any other countries to acquire it unless that country is going to do their own license manufacturing. There is simply not enough Roivalk in service (15?) to even think that South Africa will continue to provide support for this helicopter in the future if one acquires them.
@thenomad479 ай бұрын
The reason more weren't acquired in the first place was due to a lack of international interest, since it would have brought to cost of manufacturing way down when it would've started mass production for international as well as domestic sales, which was originally the plan, since the plan was for the SANDF to acquire around 40-something Rooivalk instead of just 15.
@sjsm85789 ай бұрын
Why not market it aggressively to fellow African countries? We have a persistent bandit problem in northern Kenya I'm sure our boys would appreciate this
@Ghoulza9 ай бұрын
@@sjsm8578 it was USA-made threats to anyone who showed interest in buying it.
@stonewolf78509 ай бұрын
In truth I'm sceptical that the country is still capable of producing these helicopters. DENEL is now controlled and run by the absolutely corrupt "new" government.
@thenomad479 ай бұрын
@@sjsm8578 Because, quite frankly, even despite it being cheaper than it's Western and Eastern Counterparts, it's still too expensive for other African countries. And, they'd rather buy 2nd hand American, European and Russian equipment before buying South African equipment. Why? Who knows, as them
@premierhoner6149 ай бұрын
Correction!!! The South African army did won the 23 year bushwar, the poletitions lost the war. We were sold out by our own government of then...
@danieferreira90948 ай бұрын
You are partially correct. We won every battle, but out-ran our logistics lines, which makes it impossible to hang on or occupy territory taken. We had to withdraw from certain key positions after winning crucial battles in order to refuel and rearm, giving the enemy the reprieve they needed to think they actually won. In the end, the war had to end as the country was moving into a new direction of inclusive government. In truth, the war bought us time to attain a more equitable political solution. I would not chalk it up as a loss.
@politicalsheepdog9 ай бұрын
Before South Africa can do basic things in the World, the people need to throw out it's current government and install a government that represents all the people.
@markmark30348 ай бұрын
80s infantry veteran here, border and townships. SA lost the final round strategically but not tactically. The SA political leadership forbade the SADF from breaking the Cuito stalemate by attacking from the unmined western flank which would have destroyed the remnants of the FAPLA brigades, led by Cubans and sponsored by the Soviets. It should be noted that the intial investment by the Soviets was in response to CIA meddling in Congo and Northern Angola. Refer to book by John Stockwell ex CIA. After the debacle in Vietnam,, the US Congress refused to authorise the spending for another anti-Commie war in Africa for Kissinger to play with, and SA was spared being sucked into a bigger war, thank god. But the Soviets had their proxies in place and their attention turned to liberating SWA and ultimately SA. UNITA was an obstacle to that and thus the annual campaign toward Jamba culminating in the BIG offensive of 87. The fact that they were turned back and SA was then able to decouple from SWA in a controlled way means that that mission of SA was at least accomplished. Wider history then overtook Southern Africa. The bottom line is that the border war had become too expensive to maintain, weakening SA when they were facing ever-growing civil unrest within SA and international boycotting. Understand that the Russkis don't need to conduct resource war invasions because their country is huge and has just about everything already. The shenanigans in Afghanistan, Angola and now Ukraine were for strategic reasons, under provocation, as part of the global arm wrestling match with the US, going back to the Allied militaries fighting in Russia in1919, supporting Imperial Russia against the Bolshevik revolution. Even the Cuban missile crisis was in response to the provocation of the US first putting nuke missiles in Turkey. Google it. Recommended reading: The War for Africa by Fred England.
@detdet38717 ай бұрын
it should also be added that SA was also helping Southern Rhodesia, covert ops in Zambia, Mozambique and I think also in Botswana,as well as tuinops within, it wasn't just Angola where we were involved.
@abongiledlova4779 ай бұрын
The Republic of South Africa did not loose that war my friend. Why do I always hear propaganda about my country on the internet, its very strange.
@Goblynn-s5l8 ай бұрын
U literally lost U were in angola to stop it being used as a base by SWAPO U LOST NAMIBIA THEREFOR BLATANTLY U LOST THEN YOU SURRENDERED YOUR WHOLE COUNTRY IN 1994, HOPING THAT THE EUROPEANS WOULD ACCEPT YOU, BUT THEY KNOW YOUR CREOLES & SO DISCRIMINATE AGAINST YOU Just be sure to keep telling yourself you won when the lights and the electricity don’t work for about 18 hours of the day down there😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
@lluvik24509 ай бұрын
and now the saaf can barely keep the thing flying
@Militaryheritage9 ай бұрын
@WeaponsDetective. Stating that South Africa was losing the war is a gross inaccuracy.
@craigbritz1684Күн бұрын
Weapons Detective is never gonna live that one down. Get your facts straight Weapons detective, you're pissing a lot of people off!
@troothhertz62979 ай бұрын
Our new South Africa cannot even keep the lights on ..so manufacturing Rooivalk ?? Lmfao 😂😂😂
@Jacquobite7 ай бұрын
You certainly aren't helping anything. Go look after your own shit before talking kak.
@pitmarkovic45456 ай бұрын
Political Basta....Always have Money and most of the second class to stupid to check anything,better without thinking🎉
@imerastrojerodiesel93939 ай бұрын
Una belleza... saludos desde Argentina
@armandlubbe49359 ай бұрын
South Africa didn't lose the war, know your history, go look up battle of Cuito Cuanavale, South Africa was winning the war, backroom politics chose to end the fighting with intervention from USA.
@thepatriotsrage6619 ай бұрын
More like lack of support from the USA, but yes; you're spot on.
@olivierpuyou36219 ай бұрын
I am not enough of a specialist to see why this helicopter is obsolete. Yet it seems to have everything necessary to make it a good machine, well maybe apart from its 20mm gun while almost all the others have 30mm? In any case, my thanks for once again introducing me to a device unknown to me.
@thepatriotsrage6619 ай бұрын
Likely because it's an `1980's design that has had very little changed or upgraded since then. The avionics are waaaay outdated and need a complete replacement. It was cutting edge 40 years ago, but it's long since lost its edge to the Tiger, AH-64, Hind...
@gideonvanniekerk42529 ай бұрын
Apparently I’ve heard that our 20mm ammunition is so potent it’s effective enough to be equated to a 30mm projectile
@timmurphy55419 ай бұрын
Electronics date quickly. It's a problem if you cannot get spares.
@ruddle-tango9 ай бұрын
I remember it being advertised in Africa Defence Mag way back in the early 1990s; I assumed it was already operational and being sold to interested armed forces
@Waldemarvonanhalt9 ай бұрын
Sadly DENEL is in the shitter, so don't count on ever seeing the Rooivalk in large numbers, let alone production for export.
@erkanylmaz55649 ай бұрын
Thanks for video. My favorite is Türk Atak T 129.
@stein58589 ай бұрын
your intro is cool bro.💪
@johanbrittz90548 ай бұрын
Correction! South Africa did not loose the war. The war was settled politically! Get the facts right
@brunocalico9 ай бұрын
South Africa was loosing the war? The Berlin wall came down, it changed everything in politics and began the end of the cold war at that time.
@mallachsteve9 ай бұрын
The gunship boat has sailed. They're a relic, aside from when confronting lightly armed militias and in very specific circumstances. Too many very good MANPADS. Pivot to drones.
@Leec_19729 ай бұрын
Most wars will in fact still be like that and inerdiction and close support from such a plaform will be indespensable.
@mybru19 ай бұрын
Lightly armed militias? The first confirmed combat op for the rooivalk was taking out anti aircraft cannons firing at it
@quakethedoombringer7 ай бұрын
Doubt so. If anything, gunships will still be around. They will just be used for escorting carrying loitering munitions or controlling drone wingmen instead of directly participating in the fight
@fredswanepoel24259 ай бұрын
What the hell do you mean we lost the war,I was there,we had to withdraw due to international pressure!
@JAG86919 ай бұрын
Well economic pressure primarily due to the USA Sanctions Regime which severely affected the RSA economy . At best the War was in a stalemate but without air superiority and future Soviet fighters being deployed in Angola it more likely would have turned nasty, the Atlas Carver project was still in development and becoming increasingly unaffordable to attain. The change in the USSR happened at the right time.
@entropy_of_principles9 ай бұрын
....why not ? with some avionics and sensors can be a really game changer, Apache use same way of marketing of war, new avionics, new sensors and its armamants.
@Sir_Godz9 ай бұрын
cool chopper
@flipster72859 ай бұрын
The bigger question is whether Denel will be able to deliver..... the company received a R3.4billion bailout from government during 2022 and progress to meet treasury's requirements has not been too great. Hopefully they can sort out their financials and not sink back to the brink of being insolvent...
@mybru19 ай бұрын
They've already restarted project hoefyster which is the replacement for the ratels. They're exports with regards to the umkhonto SAM systems have increased by nearly 40% over the past 5 years. Apart from rheinmetal denel is the only company allowed to produce the assegai artillery ammunition for NATO artillery systems
@hakanpolattr9 ай бұрын
Comment..Comment From TÜRKİYE...
@hakanpolattr9 ай бұрын
Comment..Comment From Türkiye..
@SA-xf1ebАй бұрын
I'm surprised they haven't sold more of these to smaller countries.
@stevenmoodley46998 ай бұрын
👍🇿🇦 impressive
@easyganer9 ай бұрын
we didnt lose the war
@mattaikay9259 ай бұрын
absolutely stunning machine - it definitely has the potential - go RZA go
@BanjoBob3379 ай бұрын
RSA
@mattaikay9259 ай бұрын
@@BanjoBob337 agreed
@wynandvervaart18 ай бұрын
we were never going to lose the war our forces was around 11km from Angolan capital and was called back as pease talks was to commence.......
@coxsen9999 ай бұрын
It is false to say that the SADF lost the war militarily, in fact FAR from it, the war was lost politically since it was based on bad political policies. The military side was won hands down by the SADF
@zali139 ай бұрын
I've loved the Red Kestrel since the 1990s. Pity Malaysia didn't buy it...
@mariusbuys53559 ай бұрын
Correction 1988 SADF was not losing the war
@muffinatordlux9 ай бұрын
It was commissioned and served much sooner than you state...
@flinfaraday18219 ай бұрын
South Africa could have taken everything up to equator if they did not decide to pull out. Maybe you need to visit the reasons for that before spewing random thoughts.
@DavidOlver2 ай бұрын
when the Rooivalk was considered for Australia we should have bought it due the having a similar climate as South Africa.
@davidkruger55909 ай бұрын
South Africa did NOT 'lose the war'.!
@JadeRofot9 ай бұрын
Well done, accent was a little thick but he was well informed.
@maarten_notjustagrip7 ай бұрын
Aside for stating we lost the war...
@tebohofokane18649 ай бұрын
Very sad chatting to pilots from 16 Squadron about lack of firepower during deployments.
@maliwanhlanhla93298 ай бұрын
It's still the best machine
@tonybrock52888 ай бұрын
Denel and South Africans in general were super intelligent and innovative and created some amazing machines like the Rooivalk which would match the Apache and created world leading armoured anti-mine vehicles like the Buffel and the Ratel etc. And then the ANC Government took over and corruption and incompetence turned it all to sh1t.
@chrisdupreez62819 ай бұрын
The USA did not loose the Vietnam war. There was political decisions taken that were in the best interest of the USA country and Vietnam country, economics and future strategies. The USA and Vietnam political leadership met in Paris in 1972 and agreed on a way forward (Vietnam today is actually a successful stable country). After that the US military withdrew from the fight - in their time in Vietnam they were winning 98% of the battles and easy having a KD ratio of 10:1. The US armed forces were the best in the Vietnam war - they did not loose the war - YES the US Armed forces fought a stupid war against the population of Vietnam - that part was politics, that was stupid, but it dont make their armed forces bad or to say they lost the war. The same with the SA Defence Force prior to democracy.
@erdiakarsu49459 ай бұрын
Usa get rekt so hard in vietnam that it gave usa a long time trauma. They forced themselves to believe they didn't lose with Holywood movies🤣🤣🤣🤣 and to make people forget about warcrimes. It works better than intended it seems 🙄
@Gulitize9 ай бұрын
Lol Vietnam achieved its goals and the US didn't I believe this is called losing the war😂 Cope harder
@einundsiebenziger54889 ай бұрын
... did not lose* (loose ≠ tight)
@olivierpuyou36219 ай бұрын
I still remember the images of panic and evacuation of the last civilians boarding the helicopters as best they could while the Viets tanks passed the embassy fences. If this is not a defeat, it certainly looks a lot like one.
@conceretejungle11509 ай бұрын
USA lost😂😂😂
@lucianohelvecioteixeira.99959 ай бұрын
Uma opção viável Forças Armadas Brasileiras devidamente atualizada mas o Brasil não tem tradição de desenvolvimento de armas Não e contínuo temos período e depois não tem continuidade exemplo própria Denel missel DARTEL e Brasil investiu depois abandonou projeto
@divinewind63139 ай бұрын
This helicopter was developed by a nation under sanctions and my country developed one in early 2010s and still under testing.
@erdiakarsu49459 ай бұрын
Didn't know we were so close to choose 🇿🇦Rooivalk instead of 🇮🇹 A129 to produce as our licenced attack helo. But what can you do as a Turk if france is involved in it. Their only unchanging national policy is unconditional anti-turkism. They definitely would hurt our process of licensing, doing anything to stop production after deal has done. It is sad Rooivalk didn't win the tender but I'm quite satisfied with T129 since it helped us quite a lot in counter-terrorism. Two interesting 🇿🇦 weapon system videos in a short time, I like it a lot. Great content 👍🙏😋 thanks Weapon Detective.
@Solveig.Tissot9 ай бұрын
Your nonsense hatred of France makes you more ridiculous and embarrassing in front of everyone than before...
@allandavis82019 ай бұрын
Given that South Africa. 🇿🇦 (S.A) was developing this technology alone due to apartheid sanctions it is impressive that it came into being,and from the narration, appears to be a potent weapons platform, well done S.A. I worked on the original Puma helicopters for a number of years on both the mechanical/hydraulic systems and the Airframe structural repair/modification side of the aircraft, I didn’t care much for the thing in all honesty as everything was back to front, the main rotor assembly going round the wrong way, and the tail rotor on the wrong side, and then having to use a control reversing mechanism just so the controls were intuitive for the crew, crazy. The Caracal looks like a very fine helicopter, but if it is the same flight control and rotor system I will pass.
@stephenaggett41738 ай бұрын
Do you know why it was originally designed back to front?
@allandavis82018 ай бұрын
@@stephenaggett4173 I can honestly say I was probably told when I did my type course at Westland Helicopters back in the early 80s, however I can’t remember if I was or was not told, please enlighten me, thank you.
@stephenaggett41738 ай бұрын
@allandavis8201 No idea Allan...was just wondering 🤔
@allandavis82018 ай бұрын
@@stephenaggett4173 if I ever remember I would try and let you know, I wish I still had my course notes, unfortunately, and very weirdly, they were stolen from my car in Nottingham, nothing else just the notes, they were not worth anything to anyone, they were not secret or anything, and there was plenty of other things that were worth something, just broke the window and they were gone. Thanks for taking the time to reply, sorry I couldn’t enlighten you.
@KonradvonHotzendorf9 ай бұрын
We need a bunch of systems from the US to make the Rooivalk. They won't sell it to us for exports as they don't want competition for the Apache
@martinkobimbo80909 ай бұрын
In these modern days I'm pretty sure you can get those systems elsewhere, unless the engine is made in the US? The engines for most western gunships are US made. Currently south African MRAPS sell well across Africa, always wondered why the helicopters don't.
@SuperChodot9 ай бұрын
@@martinkobimbo8090Probably some 20 years ago, I remember Malaysia very interested with this helicopter back in the 90s or early 2000. The same thing happen to Turkiye attack helicopter, but obviously it's a different era now.
@Leec_19729 ай бұрын
@@martinkobimbo8090 Engines are French. New avionics will be in collabouration with Turkey
@maarten_notjustagrip7 ай бұрын
Nothing on the Rooivalk project was American.
@DK-wi9zb8 ай бұрын
Nice video. Please ignore all the whiney Apartheid commenters crying over getting their asses kicked in the war in Angola. They failed all their objectives while MPLA and SWAPO are still in power today.
@detdet38717 ай бұрын
you can make comments like this because you live in a western democracy because Suid Afrika failed all there objectives, bitter about apartheid much huh poopy pants?
@TheSwanepoelmj5 ай бұрын
And this shit was developed before I was conceived. Holy shit, Engineering at its best
@1wandol4 ай бұрын
South Africa had it all and it's like lost it all but they get it back running if they want
@ejmproductions81988 ай бұрын
South Africa was not losing the war. It was South Africa that conducted missions in Angola, never did the Cubans /Angolans cross the South African border
@WillemVanwyk-pt5yh9 ай бұрын
South Africa did not loose the War. The international community withdrew their support as the Berlin wall fell and therefore there was a general reduction in all foreign missions by the west.
@j2b3488 ай бұрын
S.A. Once had a formidable army. 😊
@wiktorberski92729 ай бұрын
Interesting design, but with rathe slim chances of any commercial succes
@flinfaraday18219 ай бұрын
Why don't you do some research first about that war? What about some simple stats to start off with? FFS.
@gerhardmeyer88919 ай бұрын
Faulty history....do your research correctly first. To do that a serious researcher will analyse all angles's and use several verifiable sources. You did none of that...
@mohd.iftekharulalamemad71489 ай бұрын
Will roovialk be made again by help of Turkey?
@Pieter-p7c6 ай бұрын
Just a correction, I was there ... South Africa... did not loose the war in Angola.... stop this shit propaganda.
@cjb50039 ай бұрын
Losing the war.Yeah right.Politics came in the way,not losing.Are you Cuban? If not go ask them if SADF lost.
@sefutho9 ай бұрын
SA's best 🤔
@ChristiaanMinnaar-n4n8 ай бұрын
Did u know it's the only helicopter that could turn upside dawn,,,, South African technology
@maarten_notjustagrip7 ай бұрын
It couldn't do anything a Puma couldn't. It has a fully articulating rotor head. Anyone with chopper knowledge knows it can't fly inverted or even do a full loop. Sorry. Ex SAAF Rotary Wing AME here. I was trained on the Rooivalk.
@ChristiaanMinnaar-n4n7 ай бұрын
@@maarten_notjustagrip 👌is it true they sold the blueprints couple years back to a other nation?
@yuymu5559 ай бұрын
I request a Kawasaki OH-1
@faampie9 ай бұрын
Jy praat mos klomp kak. We did not loose that war .
@markthompson48598 ай бұрын
3 decades old almost...It's literally obsolete
@thewatcher83456 ай бұрын
Didn't the Rooivalk predate modern attack halos.....hmmmm ???
@kabzaify8 ай бұрын
South Africa needs to create is own engine, if not this helicopter has no chance, the French won't allow a competitor to grow.
@alanthom46416 ай бұрын
Was doomed by FW de Klerk. Now just a technology platform demonstrator.
@baas30129 ай бұрын
Am sorry you say we lost the war? I think you must go and read up on your history my friend.
@acongmamat36289 ай бұрын
#TUDM
@riaan64218 ай бұрын
You may know something about the Rooivalk, but you don't know anything about the war in Angola.
@MarxAlex9 ай бұрын
Read the Battle Cuito Cuanaval by Leopold scholz . Sa fought the cubans to a standstill, they didnt achieve their goals but sa was bankrupt from sanctions. No cuban tanks marched down the grand parade in cape town. As for roooi valk , under the anc sa is becoming a failed state, the project is dead. Most knowledgeable techs in denel are in the uae. The anc could not organise a piss up in a brewery .
@maitejoycemangena76048 ай бұрын
South Africa need to up grade their weapons in order to compiet with super powers ' our standrd were reduced by the enemies of black skin
@osamaalafghanee88689 ай бұрын
When it came out the Rooivalk was the most expensive gunship in the world! And it remained the most expensive gunship for the next three decades. The cost of one Rooivalk will get you two Apache helicopters.Even today it is one of the top three most expensive gunships.
@Leec_19729 ай бұрын
Source please?
@osamaalafghanee88689 ай бұрын
@@Leec_1972 C'mon...look it up yourself.
@Leec_19729 ай бұрын
@@osamaalafghanee8868 Why must I look it up? You made a public assertion with zero referral. Frankly you are talking shit with nil evidence
@osamaalafghanee88689 ай бұрын
@@Leec_1972 The answer you looking for is just a few clicks away on your keyboard. C'mon.
@gleitsonSalles9 ай бұрын
@@osamaalafghanee8868Ther burden of proof is yours
@willempretorius67009 ай бұрын
I hate it when content creators make false statements. We never lost the war. We never had more than 3500 troops in the field and still kicked the Angolan and Cuban ass, which were more than 50 000.
@louiebodenstaff67728 ай бұрын
Decades ago South Africa was going to sell loads of Rooivalk helicopters to Australia, as it is better than the US Apache choppers. The USA then forced the Aussies to purchase their Apaches, or else it would impose sanctions on them ... for those of you who didn't know ...
@worldmilitaryaircraft7 ай бұрын
good
@1jacquesnel8 ай бұрын
Your facts are so far removed from the truth it's laughable. If South Africa lost the war, South West Africa would have been invaded by the combined forces of Swapo, Cuba and Russia. The South Africa Defense forces invaded Angola and occupied the South of Agola and pushed the combined forces back north, shooting out Russian tanks, downing migs and taking Russian highly secret weapons captive. Not even the best American spies could get hold of. By the way, the South African Defense force were only 3000 fighting a combined enemy of more than 100 000 troops. Our artillery G2, 3,4 and 5 were world leading by so far that it only became competitive after 1992 when we sold it to international clients. Castro executed his losing genrals as they embarrassed Cuba. America gave the SADF 1 million dollars a day to stay in the fight, I wonder why? A peace treaty was signed to spare Cuba an Russia from embarrassing themselves. It paved the way for peaceful all inclusive political stability in South Africa. Throughout history, South African troops are from the most resilient and tough mf you will encounter in the battle field. Ask the British army who took many years and heavy losses to defeat the Boers in the Boer War, where they deployed inhuman tactics like women and children concentratian camps without medical support for sick prisoners of war who had to stay in tents in the middle of winter with temperatures goiin under freezing. The intent of British was to get their hands on the gold and diamonds that was just found in South Africa. Go figure.
@sanelendlovu18939 ай бұрын
You know, reading some of these comments makes me realize how bitter people are about our democracy. What does the Rooivalk being outdated have to do with the incompetence of the ANC?😂 Defense budget was cut becuase people needed water, electricity etc...
@henkstols93268 ай бұрын
So you saying the ANC isnt a failure after 30 years?
@sanelendlovu18938 ай бұрын
I’m not a supporter of the ANC, I’m a supporter of common sense. Look at the so called “first world countries”, like UK, USA etc. In the past 30 years unemployment increased, America has a homelessness crisis, education system failing, corruption, mass shootings, insane inflation, food prices soaring and the list goes on. My point is, even if ANC loses the elections, our problems will not stop there. We need radical change, major reforms in the way that the country is run (not talking about communism). Unfortunately, politicians are more interested in power and pageantry rather than solving societal issues.
@MillerVanDotTV8 ай бұрын
@@sanelendlovu1893yeah you need white people back in charge, and when I say white I don’t mean Jews.
@Patshes8 ай бұрын
What!!!??? Nonsense!!!
@shortMario9 ай бұрын
This helicopter is unfortunately underpowered and not suited for sustzined combat operztions. The unique logistics train of the old SADF was a unique machine not easily replicated and this machine can only fintion with this support and the comand and control mantality prevelant at the time. Its pointless in any other context then the one it was desighed for ..
@mybru19 ай бұрын
Not suited for sustained combat. The rooivalk has been the primary source for CAS I'm the DRC for over 10 years know. There were even instances that they stayed in the fight longer than hinds
@shortMario9 ай бұрын
@mybru1 My understanding is that these helicopters has been deployed operationally only once in the DRC in a direct assault capacity. As for the hinds to my knowlage the factions that the UN has been deployed against has no aircombat capacity so you must mean that the rooivalk was deployed in concert with hinds. I don't remember ever seeing such a deployment.. Perhaps you mean in general. The hind is a extremely heavy airplatform with fuel hungry engines as such the hind has limited flight time. The rooivalk does infact have longer flight time then some hind variants. This however has nothing to do with the logistics train and maintenance schedule that the respective machines require. In my opinion that the rooivalk had been assigned to the mission in the DRC had very little to do with operational needs and had everything to do with political considerations. I do not think your esesment is reflective of the reality or anything that approaches it.