DeSantis Reacts To Supreme Court Striking Down Chevron Deference

At a press briefing, Gov. Ron DeSantis (R-FL) celebrated the overturning of Chevron Deference by the Supreme Court.
Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:
account.forbes...
Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: / forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: / forbes
More From Forbes: forbes.com

[@susiebonham3167]

The EPA, CDC, FDA, NIH- Lots of covid lawsuits coming?

[@nebtheweb8885]

This stupid ruling starts now, and is NOT backward compatible.

[@mikefowler301]

ATF DOJ FBI DEA FCC FAA SEC lots of Illegal law makers out there. Woot now we can fight back fairly.

[@sassyfrass4295]

Food Safety Modernization Act!

[@giosuegenovese313]

​@@sassyfrass4295Yes.. FDA APPROVED FLORIDE in water and the BS clean water act.. CDC POLICY.. Socal DISTANCING and the Police went out Beating people into submission over an illegal POLICY..

[@troyezell5841]

Unfortunately, justice Roberts said there will be no overturning of what has already been done.

[@flybouy11]

ATF is a prime example of an agency out of control.

[@edwinmcguire6040]

AND EVERY 3 letter Agency, EXPAND GITMO.

[@masterskater256]

Yup

[@skydvrboy]

And frustratingly, because of Chevron, the rules change depending on which president is in charge. The president could order any agency to change the rules as he sees fit, so nothing is ever settled law. Now the courts can look at the law and see if it was interpreted correctly.

[@nickpond]

EPA with hot rod shop have gotten way out of control as well

[@jonkeau5155]

And the EPA

[@hoosierdaddy8002]

Keeping unelected Bureaucrats in check. I`m for it.

[@Mrjonnyjonjon123]

Meanwhile Judges: 😈

[@rickb06]

​@@Mrjonnyjonjon123at least we know their names and where they are, we have no clue who the anonymous SES state employees are, someone may just see your last name, think about it and just determine your last name matches one of their high school bullies and punish you for your name. Ironically enough, that has happened repeatedly in the IRS and ATF among others. Just like one FAA agent put 600 men on disability for their pilot status, what did they all have in common, their last name was Savage. It took a decade to even determine who did it and another decade to hold HER accountable, and i hardly consider 2 years of probation to be enough.

[@rd264]

The SCt ended Chevron deference. This means EPA is now barred from developing pollution limits. The law has to have the pollution limits for a given source of pollution or the pollution will not be limited. Citizens will have no opportunity to participate comment or sue if Congress fails to issue a pollution limit or issues a slack unprotective limit -- citizens will have no right to fight toxic air or water. Meanwhile polluters will have their lobbyists writing the limits. De Santis knows this. he doesnt care about any Oath and or duty to tell the truth to the People about what this SCt decision means. Instead tells voters that this SCt decision 'saves the nation from bureaucrats'. He is taking rank advantage of all the good voters who dont know better and all the rest who apparently dont care how toxic the water and air will become for them and their kids. De Sanits doesnt mention that Chevron deference ie deference to EPA, never stopped any Polluters or citizens from challenging limits or asking courts to intervene We the People always had the courts to resort to if we objected to EPA pollution limits - the difference now is there will be no new pollution limits to contest! Now only Congress can issue pollution limits. If you want to fight slack limits favorable to polluters [if any limits are issued at all from Congress] where can you go? Citizens have no right to sue Congress. Congress cannot be sued. But Industry can and will lobby against effective limits and push for slack ones --- citizens wont be in the loop and wont know about it.

[@Mitch_Conner75926]

@@rd264Mmkay so your source is the EPA and their pollution limits, while discrediting all the other hilariously open abuses of power by the same method 😂

[@skydvrboy]

@@rd264you should read the decision. Agencies still have the power to implement the laws by creating whatever rules they feel necessary. However, courts now have the final say as to whether they interpreted the law correctly. Before the courts were handcuffed and had to assume the government interpreted the law correctly.

[@MrMagyar5]

A huge win for the People. No more unelected administrators deciding what a law means.

[@crlake]

You mean clean water?

[@Gladescat]

No more water quality experts working on water quality. Instead, water quality cases will be bogged down in the hundreds of lawsuits polluters will file. Killing the Chevron deference effectively kills enforcement of all clean water regulations in the US. More and more, we allow big business to take away our power and protections. How is losing environmental protection a "huge win" for the People. You've been had by some mighty corrupt people.

[@stevelundgren990]

You have no idea what impact this ruling means to the average American. It was there to protect you. This gives power and unaccountability to big corporations.

[@MrMagyar5]

@@stevelundgren990 Are you insane? It does the exact opposite. Chevron deference was the doctrine that when a law is vague or unclear, then the courts allowed the administration in charge of enforcing that law the ability to decide its scope and meaning. Administrations which are unelected. Administrations which are prone to corruption and bribery. Administrations whose members are allowed to purchase the stock of companies whose policies they interpret and implement. This ruling helps end the administrative state that has become our government. A state more interested in the profit of its members than in the well-being of its citizens.

[@DarrellBeckford]

@@crlake There are already laws for this.

[@LiveYourDream-h7e]

End the administrative state!

[@Gladescat]

End of clean water.

[@av3rsi0n]

​@@GladescatNo it's not. 🤦‍♂️

[@timboylen5475]

It’s a constitution republic, not a democracy. Democracy is never mentioned in the constitution or the articles

[@GODHATESADOPTION]

The constitution was a sabotage on the articles. Which is why my family never signed it and wrote a bill of rights.

[@ghanova]

constitutional republic, you forgot 'al' 🙂

[@rickybobby8224]

It's indirect democracy, Nerd. And the elected representatives are tasked with making law per the Constitution, Nerd.

[@02autogt]

​@@rickybobby8224the correct term is Constitutional Republic, not "indirect democracy"... Stop trying to make it fit your narrative...😂😂😂

[@kenkarish826]

​@@rickybobby8224 We are not an indirect democracy genius, We are a constitutional Republic. Try reading article 4 Section 4 of the U.S. Constitution.. Ask a Republican if you need help with the big words. 😂😂😂

[@siuwahchan]

The "experts" have been wrong so many times and have ruined so many business and homeowners, particular small business and property owners in rural areas,

[@IRaoulDuke]

Because they bring in "experts" that favor what they want. The "experts" are nothing more than paid shills.

[@circles79]

says you. what are you some sort of "expert"?

[@digitalnomad9985]

@@circles79 If nobody but an "expert" is allowed to notice that an "expert" is wrong we don't have a Republic.

[@NN-sj9fg]

Let's just put the word "expert" into perspective - an "ex" is a has-been and a spurt is a drip under pressure.

[@susancrabtree5705]

They are NOT experts. They are big mouthed bullies.

[@christopherwhull]

Love that Ron took a minute to spike the ball on the administrative state. The last 30 days have been full of alot of other news, but highlighting this record win for the american people was certainly needed.

[@Matt_justlikethat]

Can we just remember the gist of Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address: a government by the people, of the people and for the people shall not perish.

[@JH-ex6mb]

This win was lead by The Washington Legal Foundation. They need our support.

[@m.schetr7398]

Just like the EPA making laws and you have no recourse. Now they can't do that

[@AppalachianMountaineer1863]

Just like the ATF making rules retroactively and almost making me a felon overnight for owning something I purchased legally from a licensed seller

[@joshuamclean9196]

I don't think you understand how hard it was for the EPA to set rules or how broad those rules are. The loss of Chevron means judges now get to decide which of those regulations are constitutional. I hope you trust that the judge hasn't been bought out and lives in the same area you do when someone brings a case on the legality of regulations concerning drinking water

[@chriskelly6559]

@m.schetr, enjoy that brown water coming out of your faucet.

[@Mitch_Conner75926]

@@chriskelly6559Lol cry harder. By the way most water sources are managed by the state and it won’t be polluted cause you’d have millions of people immediately complaining and suing over it. Stop being dramatic cause your communists lost a large amount of power 😂.

[@Mitch_Conner75926]

@@joshuamclean9196The EPA was seizing peoples property for any number of reasons. All you all cry about is drinking water 😂 you have no grasp of the severity of abuses that were going on all you see is what’s right in front of you.

[@tracycummins601]

YAY!! Elected officials should make laws, not these agencies!!!!!

[@bakedturkeys2132]

Yeah, but now we have to stop those politicians from from hiring those agencies to draft up laws for them. Do you see what gets packed into those omnibus bills?

[@kevina3136]

Supreme Court isn't elected.

[@kenkarish826]

Maybe the legislator should stop writing ambiguous laws, and in the case where it needs to be ambiguous they should put up boundaries that way there is no mistaking what the law means or what the legislator is trying to say....

[@TheAircool1]

And what happens when a regulation is urgently required to be updated immediately. (Perhaps something like a certain ingredient being revealed as cancerous, or a loophole being found in a regulation that allows other unelelected bureaucrats to abuse their power) You could potentially be waiting months for a law to be passed. All this change will lead to is America falling further behind the rest of the world politically and economically due to how old and inefficent our government strcucture is

[@kenkarish826]

@@TheAircool1 I guess its better then making snap decisions that could be disastrous infestations.....

[@JosephDeLuna-yj8vg]

The Feds Are Not Allowed To Do This Anymore!!!

[@junicohen7918]

It's not like they won't just ignore it

[@Mitch_Conner75926]

@@junicohen7918Lol they can choose to ignore it but when it ends up in court they’ll lose a lot more than just money. Every violation puts the violating agency at risk of losing more funding and just being outright removed. Chevron was a blank check for whatever they wanted, now it’s gone. They’ll be forced to be a lot more careful. Especially now that they can no longer do the two step approach with court cases.

[@John-lj8rv]

Think of all the legal precedent they have set that on it's face should be considered unconstitutional now, but won't be. The only reason its been revoked is because they believe enough precedent has been set for them to continue unmolested with the tyranny.

[@davidpar2]

@@junicohen7918this ruling has opened the doors for lawsuits against the bureaucrats who were previously enjoying unjustifiable immunity from them.

[@6102oneWolf]

This takes unregulated control and power away from self righteous groups that are not elected officials. Gives the individual or business the ability to fight back. 👍

[@WilliamLaakkonen]

even elected officials are not law MAKERS - only CONGRESS may make laws

[@rome79735]

@@WilliamLaakkonen Yeah tell that to the ATF who re-writs laws they see fit to push their Anti Constitutional ways.

[@Ghostfancoder]

@@rome79735Yes like Hunter Biden being convicted on a question that was written by the ATF. I’m glad you are oppose his conviction since you care about the 2nd amendment.

[@curly__3]

This goes well beyond federal bureaucracy. It is ruled on the basis that bureaucracy cannot be trusted to point the direction legally on constitutional issues. So in essence, this has removed all state and local government power to use deference in making laws that are federal court jurisdiction...like anything that has to do with the 5th amendment and the 2nd amendment, etc...

[@GODHATESADOPTION]

Thank God my family wrote those amendments to save us from the evil constitution. Luther Martin was a genius!

[@richardayala4356]

One of the best court decisions in decades!!

[@1960fusion]

Amen!!!

[@ChrisH-j7z]

The FCC, ATF, DEA, NIS, CIA, FBI, etc., etc., etc., should all be dissolved!

[@JstJeff19]

Accountability is the best deterrent when morality is no longer the norm

[@billfarmer7984]

There is nothing that will stop them if they have no morals.

[@edb3877]

Tyranny by bureaucracy... whatta concept! 😕

[@jackshafto9123]

This was the most important decision this week. Desantis is the best at explaining these issues. I can’t wait till he runs in 2028

[@susancrabtree5705]

Here, here! Yea! We the people got a step up in being able to speak our minds.

[@_.-AAA-._]

The people did not elect federal agencies to represent them.

[@jwolf4444]

That is technically true but the people did elect all* the past executives who put said agencies into place in order to serve the best interests of every citizen. (*Note: or most of the executives depending on your opinion. I don't mind what your opinion is on the 2024 election as this has, in essence, always been how the government has functioned. We are talking about a way longer timescale than iust 2024.) Governor DeSantis instead is looking out for the interests of big corporations at the expense of the interests of every day Americans such as all of you. An example of this can be seen when looking at other agencies this will effect. Ask yourself; who has something to gain from an agency such as OSHA loosing the ability to create rules designed to grant citizens (citizens Exactly like yourself mind you,) protections from an abusive boss or workplace? Wouldn't you want your children to be able to work without feat of injury, abuse, or death? All the things DeSantis talks about only ever result in the removal of protections for the American populace to then allow for further pillage by corporations. Just go back and look at the results of any of his policies for yourself if you don't believe me. Follow the money.

[@BlueMountainSports]

You would just have to pass a law that says Osha worker protections are going to be enforced. Then you do not need osha.

[@davidclay3737]

@@jwolf4444 Agreed then you have companies who were given the power to self regulate and nasty things can happen. Look at DuPont and what Teflon did to the workers and environment.

[@Mitch_Conner75926]

@@jwolf4444Lol right, if you think the bulk of past “elected” officials were elected by the people and not by wealthy donors you’re delusional. So no the people didn’t elect people who put this garbage into place. If voting mattered, they wouldn’t let you do it.

[@Marleylucyandme]

Sorry but we can’t trust corporations with our air, water, soil, food. They have contaminated us with cancer enough. Why do we think this is a great decision when they companies don’t care about our health and our environment

[@billandbeverly]

You tell them sir. Enough is enough .

[@joshuajackson6342]

stop the crime spree by these private corporations

[@musicgeekish]

This is great news for our country! Love Governor Desantis!🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

[@jdranchman2905]

The Water of the USA issue is an example of how the Fed bureaucratic tenured folks abuse their positions. Great SCOTUS decision. Now Congress must get to work or leave us the hell alone.

[@Gladescat]

And now you have polluted water. Congrats!

[@fredcarbery3966]

​@Gladescat Linda u have a polluted mind

[@kenkarish826]

​@@GladescatWho told you that Gladescat?

[@Gladescat]

@@kenkarish826 25 years of bioassessment work told me. Any environmental protections will be stalled in the courts to oblivion. Consequently, your environmental protections erode away.

[@kenkarish826]

@@Gladescat So tell me in your 25 years of bioassessment did any of your assessments prove to be incorrect?

[@bab008]

There was little or no "checks and balances" to protect individuals against Federal agencies making up their own rules and also handling any appeal.

[@fredcarbery3966]

This IS THE FIX

[@John-fp2ls]

You really got to love that guy I know we all have our faults but he I believe he really loves this country and all the people that live in this country

[@BillyWebb-dv9yg]

This ruling gives power back to the people.

[@rd264]

no actually it means you are gonna get a alot more toxic water and air now. ending Chevron deference means EPA is now barred from stopping pollution unless the law specifies the pollution limits for a given source of pollution. The far right owned by polluters doesnt want to put on pollution controls. BTW, Polluters always had the courts to resort to if it did not like what EPA was doing. Polluters know that Congress does not have the time or expertise to write limits in the laws.

[@BillyWebb-dv9yg]

@rd264 not at all, it requires then to take you to court, a real court. And to have a fair trial.

[@BillyWebb-dv9yg]

@rd264 you can stop parroting the gooberments argument. They just don't want to lose that control aspect that they never should have had, the atf,fbi,cia,doj,congress and corporations should never, ever be able to prosecute anyone, that is only allowed in a court of law.

[@skydvrboy]

@@rd264Please read the decision before you continue spewing lies about what it included. It does not prevent agencies from making new rules and giving those tiles the force of law. It also does nothing immediately with any of the rules already in place. It only allows the courts to determine if those are consistent with the law instead of deferring to whatever the government wants the law to say.

[@CVenza]

@@rd264 ; You really don't know that.

[@bobconnor1210]

The case at the heart of the decision was a mandate by a federal agency that forced commercial fishers to have an agent onboard while at sea and Pay His Salary because congress had allocated no funds for that. Another arbitrary rule, with the force of federal law, dreamed up by a bureaucrat. Hopefully, we’re done with that noise.

[@ninajefferson4018]

The Supreme Court overturned the Doctrine called the Chevron Defence. When there's a bureaucracy that acts against the laws in a way that they don't have the authority you have the right to sue them. Because if these bureacrats are coming at you and their wrong on the law you have the ability to go into court and have the court say yes your right your right on the law & the rule of law but the Chevron Difference says it doesn't matter if you're right on the law we're going to defer to what these experts from the bureaucracy think the law means or what the regulations should mean. The bureaucracy are people who are not elected or appointed . These are people who are not accountable, people that are often wrong. So the Chevron Defermce empowered the administrative state , so the so called experts recommended by these bureaucrats that charge the states & gov't outlandish wages for their opinions claim it's how the law is interpreted in their opinion will no longer be a part of the courts any longer!!

[@MarilynVaughn-xf7pb]

It has been called legislation by regulation.

[@nebtheweb8885]

Without regulation every stream and river in the US would now be irreverseably poluted. Remember when you could literally light the Hudson river on fire? Wait until the next oil spill happens. One like the BP Deep water Horizon happens and focks up the entire Gulf coast like the last time. They are still recovering from that mess.

[@timcox6796]

For the most part, the only thing I ever notice congress doing is sitting around in front of a camera yelling at each other. I bet they all go to lunch after and have a good laugh on the American people.

[@kandykane3552]

2 arms of the same beast. They ate all in on it.

[@wytrose4602]

Thank goodness set us free from their bizarre cult ideas .

[@susiebonham3167]

It was a rigged casino. This will trim lobbiests lining pockets.

[@davekay9495]

"cult ideas" 😅😂

[@Gladescat]

"Cult ideas" like wanting clean air and water? Or do you trust Exxon and DuPont to provide you with clean drinking water?

[@davidrounds3245]

Now if you have a pond on your property , it actually belongs to you again and not the federal government. The bureaucrat from the government wont come in and tell you what you can and cannot do with your water.

[@Gladescat]

So go ahead and pollute it to your heart's content. No accountability now!

[@Sundayschoolnetwork]

DeSantis is back on his best game! Florida needs him.

[@ceg2235]

America needs him to be Trump's VP! Then Florida can have him back after he takes over as POTUS in 2028 & 2032. 😘❤🤍💙

[@truthmatters8241]

@@ceg2235 NO. JUST NO> He's a rino backstabber. Don't be fooIed.

[@ceg2235]

@@truthmatters8241 DeSantis is not a RINO. Rubio's a RINO in GOP clothing, and Burgum said in an interview that he would never do business with Trump, and Ramaswamy is too green. Trump doesn't need another Mike Pence type, like Burgum, and Burgum would never have Trump's back. If not DeSantis, then Ben Carson would be the best, and most experienced choice. I'm looking more into the future for 2028 & 2032 - that's why I want DeSantis. He was the only Governor that refused to shut down his state during the pandemic. He's also stopped China companies from purchasing up all the land in Florida - because, well, we all know what China is trying to do. His track record running Florida is why I hope Trump chooses DeSantis.

[@janislohman8125]

Thank you GOD, JUSTICE IS ON THE MOVE, GLORY TO YOU GOD!!

[@familywu3869]

DeSantis, the best governor

[@DavidVelez-qk9cc]

Can't stop laughing 😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅

[@johningram1920]

You need to raise your standards.

[@scottmichael3745]

We LOVE ❤ our governor! DeSantes is the frigging MAN!! Love this guy.

[@JackArkitekt]

DeFuehrer... you lost!!!

[@comicrandomness3289]

Better than what I've got. Yeah. Newsome in California. He's the worst. Don't vote Democrat. California is living proof. It doesn't have to be Republican but do not vote blue.

[@scottscheuerman8714]

The getting rid of chevron deference is a good thing it does away with bureaucrats making decisions that should not be making decisions for a law

[@rd264]

actually it means you are gonna get a alot more toxic water and air now. ending Chevron deference means EPA is now barred from stopping pollution unless the law specifies the pollution limits for a given source of pollution. The far right owned by polluters doesnt want to put on pollution controls. BTW, Polluters always had the courts to resort to if it did not like what EPA was doing. Polluters know that Congress does not have the time or expertise to write limits in the laws.

[@1235vfr1]

Straight up wrong

[@scottscheuerman8714]

@@1235vfr1 you are the one wrong

[@1235vfr1]

@@scottscheuerman8714 we are all entitled to our opinions 👌

[@davidpar2]

@@rd264no it doesn’t. Far left government overreach fear mongering, 100% bs

[@RayWilliams-x2g]

Thank you Ron .

[@leonardjanda6181]

Very well explained ❤

[@Inspired2Teach]

Only Congress can introduce and pass laws: which must be signed by the President and hold up to challenges in the Courts. That’s more than enough stupidity and trouble for most Citizens. We don’t need an out of control bureaucracy any more than we need a rabid dog.

[@OptimalDigital]

Amen DeSantis, We the people are winning and they don't like it

[@lasttry99]

Winning. What about the censorship laws

[@JackArkitekt]

​​@@lasttry99Fascist Republicans will loose this election and all following up...

[@Nonononono12345-o]

My. Fiend, the government is out of control…. EPA, fda, hhs, atf, justice. When the regulator is the sole interpreter of the rules….

[@henryhenderson7051]

Well said DeSantis. Very well explained. Spell it out to the idiots of the world.

[@rd264]

you are ignorant. if you dont know what that means ask your momma.

[@davidyeo3420]

@@rd264do you think it was reasonable at all for the New England fisherman to be required to pay the salary of the federally appointed inspector “crew member”on board their boat to inspect their catch??? Seems like a blatant abuse of power and convenient interpretation of the law by the National Marine Fisheries Agency doesn’t it.? This overstep was the straw that finally broke the camel’s back!!

[@davidpar2]

@@rd264if you sincerely believe you’re somehow vindicated by that, we can all let the reality of DeSantis’ words, the supreme court’s ruling, plus the reality of the world we all actually live in collectively speak for itself on that point 😆🤡

[@paulwelch7558]

We the people are coming for them in November.

[@davidpar2]

There are three branches of government, not four, and the purview of interpreting the law lies with the judiciary, not the bureaucracy.

[@rocknreality5180]

I got to explain to my va doctor that I can now sue him lol I love it

[@loripiontek]

LMAO

[@turtletruth]

50 years ago was my (3rd) third Non-Violent/Victimless DUI ... (Pullover arrests) All three offenses were VOID OF VICTIM, INCIDENT, ACCIDENT, and DAMAGED PARTY. After serving (6) years as a front-line Marine during the Iranian crisis (1979), (Before having a wife, children, and grandchildren) returning to civilian life (Honorable Discharge) was difficult... Can the Bruen decision help this 67-year-old Marine regain his gun right! When DUI arrests have NO victim, NO incident, NO accident, and NO damaged party, the 2nd Amendment "Right/Privilege" should never be "eternally abrogated"! Why should taxpayers pay taxes when they have no rights? Is that not TAXATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION ...! - USMC (Semper Fidelis) SGT E-5 (5811)

[@trentp151]

So does this mean the IRS doesn't have the power to take your stuff now?

[@crappy60]

Well said and explained.

[@pARabell9mm]

0:53 "If a bureaucracy acts against you, in a way they don't have the authority, you have the right to bring a lawsuit against them.... " Yeah. But most folks don't have the money... How about a legal system that doesn't concentrate on Latin words and phrases, and instead worries about common words, like, I don't know, Infringed...

[@skydvrboy]

Infringe comes from the Latin infringere. 🤔

[@pARabell9mm]

@@skydvrboy Maybe so, but we here in the U.S. of A. don't generally (unless you're a lawyer or doctor) speak Latin. The text of the 2A doesn't look like this - "shall not be infringere." Either way, thanks for the lesson, now go teach those idiot judges the definition of the version we use :)

[@lauradorman529]

Thank you Ron DeSantis for giving an excellent explanation of what the Chevron treaty is all about!

[@jayceperlmutter4317]

Basically the lawmaking arm of the government had been shifted from the Congress to the Executive Branch - now the Congress is actually going to have to their jobs - get busy Republicans! Not holding my breath here.

[@rodneywoods4442]

Time to reign in the bureaucrats.

[@ChristopherVangorder]

Maybe Ron DeSantis can help the fisherman keep their job in merrit Island wildlife refuge.. the feds are out of control..

[@USMC6976]

Chevron Deference assumed that the bureaucracy would have the experts, it doesn't. We have bureaucrats with no knowledge of how firearms function deciding what a machine gun is.

[@amyduncan7242]

Looking at all the 3 letter government agencies and corporations with their "rules", ESG etc...👀

[@tomcat7843]

Our Federal government needs to shrink by 600,00 employees on day one. That will be a good Start.

[@jimjenkins2319]

I had our local (self described National) socialist just give me a complete freak out over the Chevron decision. That was all I needed 😎. 😁

[@kegginstructure]

His explanation, though obviously a bit off-the-cuff and thus a bit awkward, is spot on.

[@seekingtruth3054]

Correct: One reason congress deferred to the administrative state is because it got them off the hook of possibly offending some of their large donors.

[@misssadied193]

No more career politicians!

[@JoeStill-un9gp]

To the Republic, for which it stands. One Nation under God. Amen Jesus is coming

[@j.angelis6934]

Actually very good to hear Ron DeSantis clearly articulate what the supreme Court ruling on Chevron means in a positive way for all Americans.

[@fishydubsfishing6516]

They should not have taken decades to dissolve

[@kenkarish826]

Maybe the legislator should not write or pass ambiguous laws? Then we wouldnt have this issue....

[@Bebo-py3vp]

This also would’ve stopped vax mandates. It returns power to Congress.

[@ryanmaines6290]

I really like DeSantis he genuinely seems like a man with only the best intentions for law & Order. But more importantly he stands up for individual rights and the ability to challenge deep state. May God protect you and bless you Ron DeSantis keep fighting for our rights we love you man❤

[@jamesmccloy-brooks5465]

He’s definitely not a Law and Order guy

[@JackArkitekt]

​@@jamesmccloy-brooks5465he is DeFuehrer and applauded to unelected body of 9 aristocratic authocrats called as US Supreme Court...

[@trapar1374]

So this decision allows justices who know nothing about an issue are allowed to make a deception without knowledge of the impact of the decision, environmental issues would be my greatest concern.

[@michelleturner8558]

What going on with Garland are they throwing the book at him or not for the tapes of Biden talking to Hur classified documents case

[@junicohen7918]

Don't count on it.

[@davekay9495]

Settle down karen

[@odysseyusa]

An expert/judge, paid their salary by the agency that is taking a contested action, is biased. They are there to justify their existence.

[@Mechanickirk]

All the alphabet agencies need to be audited for their missions and their actions. Most of them should be shut down! Some should be reigned in! Many should face charges!

[@bhinojosa4085]

Thank you Supreme Court for overturning the stuff that isn’t legal!!!!

[@jimluebke3869]

This is one of the greatest victories in the new Cold War -- Mandarins vs. Free People.

[@RealMTBAddict]

Brandon is big mad 😂😂😂

[@kennethmcdonald5278]

You do not own your land , you cannot dig a well build a pond , shed , barn on your land without a permit , here in michigan you can be fined for campiing on your oown property without being a licensed campground , i know of a case where that was enforced , a man and woman werebuilding a house and they would builld.on the weekends because they worked , they would stay in a camper , they were told they could not do tha to go to a motel , consumers.enrgy the township the county owns your land , do away with property taxes then they will lose that hold on land owners , we just rent the landfrom the government , don't pay your taxes for two years andi will be peoven right , no more right of wY on private property , i doo not allow consumers cut trees willy nilly , take away the counties brush hogs , or at least regulate their use , not to be used to butcher peoples properties., city folks will not see the impotance they are used to being pushed around , we in the rural country that own land we know

[@RAYANDERS-w4t]

RON, RON, RON, 2024 !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[@sabaha4637]

No way.

[@hoosierdaddy8002]

VP yes.

[@CVenza]

NO NO NO!

[@Brick1978]

Does this mean we can sue the pharma companies for the vaccines ?

[@CVenza]

@Brick1978; Sue? They are facing Crimes Against humanity.

[@boaa588]

They are suing Pfizer in Kansas.

[@derekjet7715]

So he is embracing reigning in agencies but advocates for more abuse in policing? The most out of control entity in the coutry is the police force, so how do you not see the irony here?! I am sure there are some ill intentions with this ruling, but it does seem to sound like a positive, but you can't be for it for some agencies while encouraging others to do the opposite, it's absurd!

[@tripstar3563]

That is literally the courts job. The lower courts had no authority to ceede their authority to the executive branch. That is why the supreme court ruled the way they did. They literally took their authority back.

[@veronicanewport-cr7pw]

So means you not protected from dirty water. Or clean air. Safety rules at work. All protection would be lost

[@jerrodyeomans464]

Laws don't stop criminals. Just watch how they don't follow this law.

[@761jared]

As a federal employee, I agree with this ruling. It might adversely affect my job in the future, but we'll see what happens. I also wonder what might happen as an unforeseen, unintended consequence, especially if able to be abused by bad actors. That said, we've had too many governmental "bad actors" representing private interests or acting as nannies to the public in recent history.

[@CVenza]

@761jared; Those bad actors are very well-paid AKA Analysts given high GS Grades. All agency's need to be cleaned out.

[@SageLittleHawk]

People are concerned with unelected officials, but the elected/selected officials are just as bad. 😂

[@MrCryptoChris]

"We the People" feel like hostages and the saddest part is we pay them to abuse our trust. Govt, always feels the need for more govt.

[@sandyacombs]

How many people have the money to sue the government? The justice system is really for the rich not the common man.

[@bombsaway6340]

Very reasonable ruling

[@maryjofoster1018]

Yes, the people are the governing body, not Congress or the President.

[@KrKrypton]

Hmmm... If only the pendulum didn't swing so far left that it broke the damn mechanism, and put politicians in positions where "experts" should be, this wouldn't be a problem. When it takes the director of the ATF more than 30 seconds to break a Glock down and just about ANYONE in the military can do it in less than three seconds, you might not be an expert, and you were elevated far above your station.

[@truthmatters8241]

I heard the guy has zero experience and knows NOTHlNG about guns. So who decided he's an "expert"? L0L

[@DanielGeorge-c7t]

Fresh Air Indeed! Best description of the magnitude of overturning the Chevron Rule.

[@mackenzieneal1660]

Now go after the FBI, CIA, IRS, and the ATF.

[@fb8966]

This will help slow the creation of more laws....

[@alhanserd2067]

Just stick to the constitution... anything else is void.

[@NDETV316]

As a former CPS Investigator/ 30 year whistle-blower who was told by ODJFS and USDHHS that Children Services have a rule that they dont have to go by the rules, this is HUGE. We have a case currently in Appeals and we pray this will help us finally see justice!

[@k-mparker]

Get rid of the EPA’s emission standards on diesel engines, in particular the diesel trucks!!!

[@sa3270]

Normal gas engines and vehicles too.

[@tudwortyjmcguern5689]

even when bureaurats lose they try try again

[@johnharris6655]

The court should have went farther saying that only congress can make rules and laws, agencies can submit rules to congress but congress has to approve them.

[@davidpar2]

Well, government is messy. Always will be. What this ruling says is that the bureaucracies, which will always be around as appointed by the feds, can make rules, but they can no longer enjoy the unjustifiable “immunity” from legal challenges or the luxury of unilaterally imposing said rules and threatening people with fines or imprisonment for not following them without recourse that they have enjoyed for the past 40 years

[@ogoshen]

Well good, another 3rd grade explanation. Lol

[@dustin612]

So can we burn tires until congress makes a law?

[@RayWilliams-x2g]

Yep sounds like bidenboma.