Design Principles for Battlefield 2020 - How to make it a great game!

[@AKAARTOFFICIAL]

A bit of a longer video today in a more neutral, informative style. I feel as if I needed to get this information across in a video but didn't want to lose any of the great work Potetr invested into the main document that can be found in the description. What do you think? Is the Battlefield franchise looking to do too many things at once? Are DICE focusing on what is important and bringing the key ingredients together?

[@darkcomplexity563]

Hey art you should look into the desert tech weapons like videos and stuff, desert tech weapons are really nice, I don't know how many people like researching guns but the MDR (micro dynamic rifle) is really cool, and the other models of weapons they have are amazing.

[@Copkiller1997]

Less is more, my favorite Battlefield game was Battlfield Bad Company 2 and Battlefield 2 and Battlefield 2 a close second these games were so simple and so much fun to play nowadays there is too much parkour in the games where you can just jump away from the enemy and vaulting has gotten so out of hand these newer Battlefield games feels like Overwatch or some shit like that. I like how in BFBC2 you felt heavier and couldn´t just jump away from enemy fire or vault through a window in a split second you had to break the window and then jump through with crouch and jump not an instant vaulting animation. Btw: I can´t really overstate how much I hate parkour (as I call it) in modern games it makes the games too fast paced and doesn´t feel like the Battlefield games I grew up playing (BF2,BFC2, BF3) It´s ironic that these 3 BF games I just mentioned is considered the best in the franchise and after BF4 they started with the fast paced gameplay where you can jump away from incoming fire as is seen many times in this video so maybe the previous Battlefield games were so good because they were slower paced games. And of course with customizations less is truly more if you look at BFBC2 as you mentioned there are way less customizations to chose from and you can clearly feel the difference you couldn´t have everything like you could choose if you want more ammo or a dot sight there was also fewer weapons to choose from but you could clearly feel the difference between them where as in newer BF games you can´t really feel that much of a difference and there are actually too much to choose from in terms of weapons and customization so it gets so confusing and it feels like it doesn´t really matter what you put on your guns because the effects are pretty insignificant like why do we need 4 different supressors and several grips for rifles in BF4 I can´t really feel much difference if any in any of them in BFBC4 you could feel a difference because you had to trade other equipment so it made a for a slightly different experience in using the weapons.

[@DancingTeapot]

What's everyone's opinion on BF revive mechanics? BFBC2 and BF2 - one click, revive nonstop no matter what BF3 - one click, you can revive as long as they didn't die without accepting the revive BF4 - one click 20%, one loooong click 100%, cooldown that prevents you from reviving again if they die after being revived BF1 - one click, cooldown that prevents you from reviving again if they die after being revived BF5 - one long ass animation that often ends up with both players dying In my opinion one of the core things that made BF3 great was its revive mechanics. Sure, they were OP but they made the game more fun. People were more willing to take risks while pushing since they would very likely get revived over and over again. That also means that you would spend more time playing the game than watch the spawn screen. In newer BFs it often feels like you have only one life as people don't either revive you (BF1 not that many play medics, BF4 broken revive mechanics) or you die instantly after revive and can't be revived again. For next BF I'd like to see BF3 or BF1 revive mechanics for medics and BF5 revive animations as squad revive.

[@Copkiller1997]

Many times when reviving you risk your life even with a single click you have to give up your hunt for kills to save some stranger so with 100 points per revive it´s actually worth doing it whereas getting 20 points for a quick revive to be a good mate but not wanting to risk dying to revive full is just not worth it it´s like a risk rewards thing.

[@vanvoliravioli6872]

Yes battlefield is looking to do to many things at once. Some of the things they're adding like manual leaning is amazing, I love it, it added a new spin on the gameplay and allows me to do better because half my body isnt exposed when shooting an enemy around the corner. The leaning also adds a skill curve for others that dont know how to combat that and forces them into learning a new tactic. However with all the new maps they add none of them really take advantage of this lean and add alleys that would be perfect for this improvement and instead they focus on more open maps where you can get sniped from spawn. I would love to see more actual city maps instead of country side citys

[@meshman2763]

"Its more creative. I got in contact with a guy called potato"

[@Alex-bk5hc]

Ironic isn’t it

[@stonedemokid007]

What i liked the most about Bf4 was this sandbox feeling. you could go everywhere you want, you had lots of fast vehicles and verticality. In Bf5 you are playing on the same ground level as everyone

[@celestialcolosseum]

Only thing i want is a battlefield game in a modern setting with deep customization...

[@Treyski4410]

@Ignacio Nemarich oh come on you know once bf goes modern there gonna stomp cod again cod has been losing since bf3

[@Treyski4410]

@Ignacio Nemarich cmon thats 1 game there gonna learn

[@celestialcolosseum]

@Ignacio Nemarich sick of wooden guns, i want my silenced p90 and m416

[@IlNamelessKinglI]

@@Treyski4410 BF wins in terms of gameplay but sales and player numbers are clearly higher for CoD games. Always.

[@Treyski4410]

@@IlNamelessKinglI i don't know why tho I've never got that cod has been sucking since bo2

[@אריהיהודה-ז6ק]

5 years later, still playing BF4 every night, 20k plus Aek kills, different experience everytime. It's still the best game! GG!

[@Alex-bk5hc]

Bad company 3 with that open all out war battlefield feel would be great

[@XAVAGE]

@PUPPET MASTER Let's be honest tho, what difference would the multiplayer be if it were to be called BFBC3 or Battlefield 6? They would take place in the same time/era, and the newest Battlefield game will just look like whatever the newest Frostbite is.

[@XAVAGE]

@PUPPET MASTER I've played loads of BFBC especially 2, but I simply think the way they played out was just simply the way Frostbite handled gameplay at the time, like the way players would hold their weapons, animations, and number of vehicles are just a consequence of the time.

[@XAVAGE]

@PUPPET MASTER for example if Battlefield 3 came out instead of BFBC2, I'm sure it would've looked like BFBC2

[@andreaslaban8908]

@@XAVAGE thats probably true

[@rlsjunior797]

Spot on about immersion. Having an animation for everything isn’t immersive, it’s annoying.

[@tuelzalt]

I agree almost 100% ...I loved the old spammy revive animations because it kept the gameplay fast but I like the change in BF1 to entering tanks and things because I hated when someone would run and instantly be in the tank away from all harm ..guess I'm in the middle

[@abrahamsanchez1543]

Tuelz i liked that im bf1 too (the tank thing) Stopped people from running away and hiding instantly inside a tank but would let you instantly run out of the tank.

[@tuelzalt]

@@abrahamsanchez1543 yeah it was a perfect mix of both

[@abrahamsanchez1543]

Tuelz in BFV animations just ruin the flow of the game. It looks cool but fuck does it take away that fast paced feel that BF was known to have.

[@Undersnow243]

Wtf, Battlefield Franchise is known for that, for these details (often animation and graphics) that make the game immersive with choices to do. If you just run like a tard and revive evrything around you within 1 second of delay and getting 100 points while the other guys is struggling to get 100 points with kills then it aint fair and balanced at all IMO. In this bf5 u can revive everything with any characters but you have to do the right choice to not die like like a tard because of the animation. Same for tank animation, if u really want to go in that tank you go but you can't get out like a coward when it gets messy. it's a matter of choice it adds difficulty to the gameplay and brain before each action. Otherwise go play other real fast paced fps ffs. I personally find that BF is getting better and better in term of gameplay since the very first battlefields games, along with the graphics(except TAA). It adds more and more thinking than just revive and shoot like a tard. You people always complaining for nothing because its trendy lmao.. You were crying at the start of bf4 too and now its the best ever, go buy some credibility, its becoming pathetic for real.

[@jonathanm9986]

2:48 I had to stop and say that that was a very sexy move to destroy that tank

[@teo4371]

i got an erection with that

[@cagatayguitar]

I like it too, in bf4 you need one or two more shot, after 44 magnum damage nerf.

[@MeatVision]

DICE: Which characteristic from BF4 would you like to see in the next Battlefield? Me: *YES*

[@commando4481]

No NO NO it has to come out in 2021 if it’s comes out in 2020 it will be as bad as Bf5

[@johnreynolds2055]

JJ Brooks why?

[@RonnieRonnie3697]

@@johnreynolds2055 Im guessing it's because Battlefield 5 was in development for not even a year so he thinkings the next battlefield game will be rushed just like battlefield 5

[@johnreynolds2055]

Nah they released battlefield 4 back in 2013, do you know how far technology has come since then? And that was still better than bf5 which was released last year. They just need to tweak bf4 add new maps guns and vehicles. They already have the resources for the perfect game.

[@RonnieRonnie3697]

@@johnreynolds2055 Well I better not see any issues in the next Battlefield game

[@innoh4837]

You know that If they release it in 2020 it would have already 4 Times more development Time than 5

[@normanm11]

2020 Battlefield? They need to take a break and release the next one until 2022, we need a polished game not another BFV

[@donutsuplex1009]

Or they just need to learn from previous mistakes. I really do not understand the step back from bf1 to bfv. Its unreal honestly

[@Zrigos]

Bfv is trash already Even if they add a 20 maps,it wouldn't make the game any better. It's just the game istself,something in it is not right.

[@Deaddriftbum]

The way to make the next a good game, do the exact opposite of what they are doing in Battlefield V

[@danyst-germain3852]

And more like BC2, BF3 and BF4 with the stable launch of BF1

[@rottenluxx6168]

I enjoy the movement n gunplay in bfv..

[@ramjamflimflam]

You did a great job with this video! Lots of specifics I’ve never thought about!!

[@JDOG45454545]

Just remaster BF3. Improve the netcode, reduce suppression and sun glare

[@konstantinsarychev9305]

And you get... BF4 😂

[@beastabuelos6421]

@@konstantinsarychev9305 BF4 is a trash game with 3 good maps.

[@beastabuelos6421]

Also implement pretty much every game play improvement from 4, 1 and 5. That's the perfect battlefield game right there. Crouch running, sliding, small health pouches, carried health pouch for self healing. I could go on.

[@beastabuelos6421]

@CallMePreY it doesn't matter if the game itself is terrible

[@beastabuelos6421]

@The uggster that's a good joke.

[@bengier8889]

You are definitely one of the most intelligent people when it comes to knowing about what Battlefield needs to bring its players back. I hope most of not all of these plot points will make it into the future Battlefield games because if not, I’m scared to see what will become of this precious franchise.

[@tyren818]

A lot of core people who worked on bf3 and 4 have left dice. So I doubt a game of that caliber will ever be released by dice again. I would highly recommend squad for people who love bf3 and 4.

[@hwb7324]

Thanks for the infromation, your way of explaining stuff is so relaxing and i agree with everything you said. Keep up the good work mate

[@megnus3rs]

Target: Bloodwolf115 Reason: gay 2:35

[@perceptionist2005]

MegnuS3Rs 😂

[@laithmusa798]

Lmao

[@robertov1821]

hahah

[@Jaypickels]

Love these in depth longer vids. Keep up the good work mate

[@Ben-li9zb]

"Dice knows what they're doing, and probably won't make the same mistakes they did with Battlefield 5" *curb your enthusiasm theme starts playing*

[@bugbuster8598]

13:50 OH. MY. GOD. PEOPLE STILL REMEMBER THIS GAME!!!! I loved it from day one and still play it every moment I can! Timeless masterpiece for me! Also, awesome video! I hope DICE devs and EA watches it.

[@grxwcannabis]

WOW. SUCH AN AMAZING VIDEO. LOVE HOW YOU USED THE GAME TO EXPLAIN IMMERSION. WHILE YOU WERE REPAIRING. GOOD JOB DUDE

[@BrandonLeeDry]

Talk about the shot at 12:30 Pretty good!!!

[@bigboytoy96]

Honestly, new cod’s customization in a modern battlefield setting would be dope

[@dylangauthier418]

I would buy battlefield 4 with tweaked graphics and smoother squad leader controls like the way it works in BF1.

[@s_t_r_e_l_0_o_k818]

I can't agree more Art you are officially the elite when it comes to battlefield content

[@SimonDitts]

I'd honestly be okay with waiting longer for them to get a game right. I understand they have a big job to try to fit everything together in a big package that everyone will enjoy and keep playing. Obviously, they can't cater to everyone lol. I remember feeling so excited for when BF3 came out for one because it was modern, and also it just felt really amazing. Hopefully the next game will be similar! I love this video by the way!

[@GraphicJ]

*My perfect Battlefield game:*• the graphics and authenticity of BF1 • War immersion of BF3 • the gun customization of BF4 • the minimap only spotting of BF2 • the new infantry mechanics of BFV • the in-game sounds similar to BC2 / BF3• the tactic strategy and teamplay game mechanics of BF2. (class roles, destroy/fix assets etc) • The controllable vehicle movement of BF:HL or BF4• the gunplay and soldier movement of BF3 or BF4• the vehicle gameplay of BC2 / BF3 • the *no* ridiculous customization we had before BFV • and finally, the map design of BF2 ( this is a very big one )

[@GraphicJ]

... and yes, immersion is VERY subjective to every player. Every player takes immersion differently.

[@Kasspirr]

You know what's the solution? Make the game of passion, not for money and also listen to the veteran players.

[@IlNamelessKinglI]

No. Dice needs to work alone. Most of the times the Comunity hurts the gameplay more than anything else. The comunity only needs to report bugs, glitches and features not working as intended

[@Kasspirr]

@@IlNamelessKinglI Right, It's all becouse of EA.

[@humam1088]

emanuele barrovecchio I can’t agree with you because actually most of the time not listening to the community make the game worse because after all you should make product that community love it to sell it but you should put your touch in it

[@IlNamelessKinglI]

@@humam1088 The last patches of BF4 and various patches of BF1 litterally ruined the game. The majority of the Comunity are people who don't know how to play or how games work. You shouldn't allow them to change the game. Its like giving the project of a house to a random guy instead of a bricklayer

[@humam1088]

emanuele barrovecchio The developers don’t have to listen to everyone but don’t listening at all is a bigger mistake just like BF5 and COD IW when community asked for modern era but both don’t care and regret for it and now next cod returns to modern warfare and the next BF should do that

[@justcallmelaz2407]

Ayyy talking about Team Fortress 2, game's dope. Anyway, just give us the liberty of gameplay that Battlefield 4 offered. That's why people come back, you're allowed to basically do whatever you could ask from a game when it came out, and not a lot of games allow that anymore. Squad play was insanely efficient, 4 medics 1 support suppressing the windows on Pearl Market for the medics to cross the street will always be in my heart. Map design was very good, not everything could be destroyed and that's something which isn't quite balanced anymore on Battlefield V. Rocket launchers are too environementally destructive. Battlefield 4 also had the customization, perfectly developed for 2013. Hope DICE looks at what Modern Warfare does and remixes what they've done with the past games when it comes to this point. Animations... Why in the bloody hell would you allow player models to fall from an explosion without dying. In any multiplayer game, when you fall to the ground, you're dead. In BFV, you can use that to look dead and actually flank inattentive people. Tumbling at the end of a "high" jump is also not very recommended. Vault animations are good and they are needed, medium/high wall vaults, fence vaults, but they need to be more consistent as well. Got a lot to say still but it's already long enough. tl;dr : Give us BF4's gun play, improve the gameplay, and make the head hitboxes 10% maximum bigger.

[@marijnverbunt8135]

Finally!!! Just saying this in the beginning of BF 1 - hopefully there will come a mixed game from 3 &4

[@S01DATT]

How about not insulting your player base with a certain (ahem) political agenda

[@dodgev1014]

Would have gone a long way to help BF5 find its feet

[@gordy3714]

They should make Battlefield 6 Death Simulator no strategy no immersion funnelling everyone into a small map too die.👍

[@Phenixtri]

Yea that's been every frostbite engine BF game made to date ...... BF2 was the last true large scale sandbox BF game ..... everything else since then is Skirmish Field NOT Battlefield pure and simple.

[@winstonsmith8597]

They already did. It's called Fjell

[@etho86]

When Operation Metro became so popular, feels like DICE kept making similar maps and assumed thats what the community wanted.

[@spethmanjones2997]

Ooh and if the trees were still all pixely like they are now on most maps, that could be cool too

[@andreaslaban8908]

@@Phenixtri mate i love bf2, but that that's not true with the exception of bf5 and maybe bf1

[@wizendrew6369]

Excellent video. Clarified a lot of my thoughts and feelings - let's hope the people that matter pay attention.

[@fpslifelegacy6902]

In resume: Dice repeat what you did in BF3 and BF4.

[@ghostrecon2005]

A good BF game is when you feel the war chaos where objectives are lined up in a straight line! So the objectives in the middle of the line are full of cluster fu**s. That’s what made metro & locker the most popular maps.

[@kennydongs3938]

Give the gunplay skill again. No one frame deaths. If you’re bad I should be able to return fire.

[@Yussef415]

They prioritized graphics over gameplay.

[@Treyski4410]

i honestly don't know why people slept on bfh that game had the best customization for weapons in a bf game

[@prozoomy]

I enjoyed the story for it :) online was chaos lol all them haters are going to hate

[@Treyski4410]

@@prozoomy right

[@rlsjunior797]

I like hardline. I still play it sometimes, when I’m not playing BF4 or BF1.

[@andreaslaban8908]

it had potential i was just poorly managed imo

[@findawaytowin2968]

Am I the only one that feels like battlefield needs to make the feel of the gunplay much better? Like the modern warfare for example just feels good when using the different guns, like the guns have weight to them. In battlefield games, the guns seem like pea shooters that weigh as much as a feather... this is coming from a long time battlefield fan since bf2 on the pc

[@RRJP]

Great vid. Really good points well made. Just gotta hope the devs see this 🤞

[@MoathOmran]

Please consider doing more of these deep depth videos i love them thx... I think in my opinion the main thing that made battlefield v good is the gun play its addictive.... however battlefield 1 maps were the best and more immersive.... battlefield v still has some time maybe at the end of 2020 it will be fine

[@MrDinko]

I prefer these long videos. Keep it up!

[@efegichris]

I like the animations getting in/out of a vehicle. I used to hate a vehicle rolling up onto a point and having 4 people magically appear right in front of me. Now a vehicle has to spend a bit of time clearing a point or smoke needs to be launched first.

[@ogPunkcln]

Great video. There should be more youtube videos about the principles of videogame designs. It really get your thoughts and creativity going.

[@R8erRay510]

It's really not hard take 3/4 gameplay, the destruction of 4 (first time I saw the sky scraper fall & change the map was epic) modern setting, the graphics, cinematics of 1 with whatever they did to make you feel like it's you in the war boom the perfect bf game just a perfect blend of 3,4,1

[@ubaidhunts]

Interesting video Dude. Keep on the good work

[@jpgaming9816]

I just want to be able to see players in the mini map again. Hopefully the mini map is useful again

[@cs2d20]

JP gaming I’m fine with spotting but I love the feature where u can shoot and I don’t show up on the radar that needs to stay

[@Thebest-wc3ow]

coolsub 20D I dont agree. Thats What made the suppressor so strong. It wasnt just a random gadget, it was a very useful one that just didnt grt used too much

[@tdijon7]

I could not disagree more. That was the worst part of BF4.

[@jpgaming9816]

Thebest 123 I see what you mean! I guess I have a different play style lol! I relied on it heavily to find players. And 3D spotting was very useful especially if you wanted to know if players were above or below you

[@DrakesdenChannel]

DICE LA doesn't need to be reminded because they aren't run or comprised of incompetent people. BC3 will be amazing.

[@GuyFromJupiter]

How to make a great battlefield? Make battlefield 4 with battlefield 5's technical improvements and gunplay, while keeping most of battlefield 4's weapon balance. That's it, that is the perfect battlefield. Also, please note that not all of battlefield 5's technical changes were improvements.

[@Psydrre]

Pretty much word by word on what they should do.

[@thephao4327]

What it takes is them making a Modern style game. That way people won't hate on it for being so different; such as BFV.

[@Greyhawk24]

I need rush to be back in battlefield, with that I mean a good rush game mode, with good maps designed from the ground for rush, that's what made me fell in love with BF in BFBC2 and BF3. Also DICE need to regain the identity, with that I mean that for example I don't feel what BFV wants to be, it doesn't have true personality. And also DICE need to regain reputation, I don't trust them anymore to make BF 2020

[@OGGAMING83]

I got you a man I do not play a lot of Battlefield V I have it for all platforms even PC but last night I was playing some Battlefield Bad Company and it was good to go back play some multiplayer on that house playing at on the Xbox good video bro.

[@erikcolaiezzi312]

Nailed it, thank you

[@Florreking]

In the abstract sense, If you grant players ( and vehicles) too much freedom in customization and utility, the overlap of classes (vehicles) will increase and players will tend to use what they want personally and not what is needed. I think this overlap should be reduced and further pushed to the extremes to diversify classes even more, whatever that means gameplay wise (Loadouts, mobility, recoil, damage, not 10 tanks that do pretty much the same thing, but 3 very different tanks). This could lead to a self regulated team play, which is unknown to "lonewofs". They can do their own thing, but the things they can do is limited for that class and will unavoidably help your team in some way. A different view of depth is mechanics that give rise to emergent gameplay, or in another wording, simple mechanics that can be applied across a wide variety of circumstances, I would say that this is also a form of complexity, not unlike simple atoms forming complex emergent structures, but we need to agree on definitions here. Mechanics that are limited to particular gameplay scenarios are "anti-emergent" and im not sure it is a bad thing. I think class utility is a form of anti emergency, atleast it shouldnt overlap to other classes and vehicles, but the interplay between classes should be very emergent weather intentionally (teamplay) or not (lone wolf). Its like thermodynamics, its between order and chaos interesting and complex things happen. I think weapon mechanics should use more parameters as to increase the space available for balancing, diversity, specialization and real player skill progression. Random Bullet spread amount, recoil amount * random or predictable recoil patterns, auto centering amount, damage, weight, ADS time, sway, screen effects, shake n blur and its cooldown time. For example, a sniper should have high damage (1 hit kill close>medium range) slow ads time, almost no Random bullet spread, no Auto centering, high recoil amount * predictable recoil pattern, heavy, screen shake. wheres an SMG is pretty much the opposite: Weak, fast ADS time, light, good autocentering, some amount of random bullet spread, low random and predictable recoil, no shake etc.

[@glenno2083]

I made it to end. Was some good info.

[@Gearnauto]

I know that noone has played it, but in Battlefield modern combat 2 on the consoles, Clan matches on capture the flag were THE most intense, engaging, and fun I have ever had playing a game, and it was as simple as can be. And I have been hoping that battlefield would recreate that ever since. They have done a lot of great thing since thin with the series, but depth of play is definitely something BFV struggles with. Too many opportunities to be picked off with zero counters due to game meta or design.

[@xT3CHNOL3G3NDx]

Liked that type of video a lot! Thx 🤙🏼

[@Oscarmike247]

Would like to see you try Squad, where the game is completely centered on realism, immersion, and heavily relying on teamwork.

[@Deekay1958]

Great take on games mate. A mate I play with gets a new gun, then raves about getting all the gold attachments. Personally, all I want to do is Win games, Kill people and have Fun. Sadly BFV, just isn't delivering the fun aspect I crave.

[@danyst-germain3852]

The only thing BFV got right it's the Squad leader system (I'm mean collecting points to call V1 or things like that). Sure it's need rework since I want Commander mode to be back on the next installament but it's a addition I like to see back in BF 2020

[@leafgreensniper13]

it isnt all the damn bugs that makes bfv bad, its all of this stuff that it lacks

[@dodgev1014]

And the bugs

[@techno3915]

BFBC2 + BF3 + BF4 + MW = MY BF for 2020

[@gabenderp8034]

In the next bf game i want to be able to communicate with teammates around me via voice chat. the further they from me the quieter they are. And in vehicles you should always be able to voicechat with your crew. Oh and you should be able to offer your crewmembers to change sits.

[@ramjamflimflam]

To me the biggest issue with BF5 is balance . Weapons, classes, maps etc. there seems to be a lack of immersion to get players to pick up different classes for instance and influence the outcome of matches. Gosh I hope that made sense lol! I’ve always enjoyed using all the different weapons and classes in BF games but 5 I feel limited . I’m an average player and like to move around so I’ve never been a sniper type who can sit still. Anyway great video! Very thought provoking!!

[@bobby_c07]

There's definitely less variety in weapon "feel" in BF5, which really limits viable play styles.

[@og_sane]

For me, a perfect Battlefield game now would locate in Vietnam War or the Cold War.

[@rlsjunior797]

80s Cold War would be nice. I’m more concerned that the game is good though.

[@deeeeeeeench1209]

Riki on blast love it 👍

[@MrJustsaysean]

Atmosphere is very important,especially in a war game. I sense the war like atmosphere in bf3/4 on the medium to large maps with all out armour combat with the troops running beside them making their way to am objective. I don't get that vibe with recent bfs.

[@badwolf9956]

2:07 Damn they’re vote kicking the dude because he’s “gay.”

[@Max72095]

I'm guessing "gay" was just faster than typing "I believe this gentlemen is cheating"

[@nathangregory_]

I always enjoy your content. I agree with you at times and at other times I disagree with you, but your content is always on point which I never disagree on. My only question is why in G-D's name do other KZbinrs that have high production value but very poor and predictable content have a massive following where you, on the other hand, have superior content and a fraction of the following??

[@blackavant]

I gave an opinion on one of Jackfrag's videos but got no feedback on it, so i will write the most two important things. 1 make it free to play 2 you only pay money for premium pass and for your character like buying uniforms, skins for guns, skins for tanks, helicopters, ships, ect ect. But my comment was way longer than this but these are the most important in my opinion.

[@DrakesdenChannel]

When you're high as a kite and start saying random shit: 1:17

[@Chronoverse1999]

If you wan't my opinion, they should consider returning back to the Battlefield 4 class customization. But with the classes of Battlefield 1 and 5 - Assault, Medic, Support, Recon. Though, i'd like to change the Recon into Specialist instead, a Scout/Engineer hybrid. For the field specialization they should be the same as in battlefield 4, but available to full extent (Without the unneeded field upgrade mechanic, that keeps randomly upgrading/degrading), though, Battlefield 1 field specialization mechanics could also work, since I know that it gives you more freedom in terms of customization. Another thing that I personally ask from the developers, better singleplayer content.

[@JeuneF]

why don’t you work for Dice already ?

[@EatonCorvinus]

My two cents, a Battlefield game cannot be as restrictive as BF1 and BFV were, they totally lost the sandbox and rock-paper-scissors gameplay. Give the player the creative tools (weapons, gadgets, physics and vehicles) to do what they want. Let them think outside the box and let them use these creative tools and don't let realism get in the way - the more realistic you make it (like animations for every goddamn thing), the less fun it will be. Just look at the creative stuff Pony Lion and his crew were able to pull off back in the day - launching a tank into the air using mines and C4 and roadkilling a jet. Rendezooks. Parking a boat on a jet and flying with it through the air. Surfing on your jet while throwing C4 down. THAT's the spirit! To me a Battlefield moment means being surprised by the randomness that can happen with the interplay of goofy physics, vehicles, destruction and that little bit of luck/bad luck.

[@grumpynick6119]

I'm not a Battlefield V basher. I have my concerns but as a general rule I still love the basic mechanics behind BFV. I've reinstalled BF4 and BF1 this week as I've had some time to myself and frankly, BFV as a gaming experience is a completely different level to BF1 and superior to BF4 (at least as an infantry player, tanks are terrible in BFV) . Where it falls down is in design decisions that they've made. The content with BFV is very vanilla and very under-designed. There is no immersion and the lack of ongoing content releases is the major problem. If DICE can have the game mechanics and gun play on top of a BF4 model of content then we're close to the perfect Battlefield game. Oh and make firing from a prone position much much restrictive too. (I also appreciate that everyone's experience with a game is different. I've not had the technical problems some have had bar a bit of stuttering which is annoying but not a gamebreaker).

[@jlopezleoz0124]

Best BF youtuber

[@denismarku6065]

Just remaster bf3 or 4 like cod did. Keep the play style of bf4 and just give it a bit better look !!!

[@Rodrigo24717]

THATS ALL WE NEED!!!!

[@crockybird3287]

And some newer maps.

[@royjasper842]

If dice can get back to the way things were for bf3 and bf4 then ill play the game and it'll be fun again

[@prozoomy]

i enjoyed bf3 and bf4 💙 bf1 though I played alot and enjoyed the ww1 atmosphere and gun play (minus nade spam) bfv to me just doesn't capture my attention as much...and as for the problems with the game it doesn't help.. I would like a modern game over another historic battlefield. 😀 yet "Vietnam would be cool"

[@oneyricenice4671]

u should work for dice

[@أحمدالعمار-ن1ط]

100K soon🎉🎉

[@SpazzAttack78]

Is there going to be a Battlefield 2020? Feel like they are going to wait another year

[@bobby_c07]

Their focus is so heavy on monetizing soldier customization I just dont know if we'll ever get the franchise back. The things that we used to unlock by playing are now all purchased by some shit game currency based on time played rather than how you play. I hope they find their way back but I'm not holding my breath hah. Also really hope the medic revive goes back to something that is manually done and not by lining up the prompt on screen with the right button. That's fine for squad revives but medics deserve better instead of fighting with the UI and the game itself to get those hot revives in.

[@GewoonWouter]

Maybe something worthwile considering: don't release a BF game every 3 years or so but take a bit more time to create a new game and meanwhile drop new content which is worth it in current game. In that way you can also use your time to release a product which is good in stead of needing to patch all the time to set things straight. The guys at Rockstar have understood that. Look at GTA IV, a very old game by modern release standards but it's still well supported and played by a decent player base.

[@etho86]

The series needs to progress past the 64 player limit. With the added power of the PC, surely they can make 100+ player maps. Bring back massive maps like Caspian Border.

[@rlsjunior797]

That’s what your worried about? I just want battlefield to be good again. As long as it’s good like it used to be 64 players is plenty.

[@johnrochester4504]

For me.. Realistic Modern Warfare, lots of maps, helicopters.. I will buy this over & over for decades

[@Leon12V]

It runs very smooth. I have some fps drops and i have installed It on ssd. Connection affects fps or not?

[@rustydean772]

Would like to go back to nam

[@Bayocand]

16:19 (0.25 speed) I apologise if this sounds off topic. WTF!? You activated your APS and still get hit by that Lock-on. That Grade A BS😠😡😤

[@RealCrouchen]

good video! keep it up :)

[@thepixelninja241]

I think the main reason for players returning is due to private rental servers. Something which EA stopped doing since BF1.

[@konstantinoskaouris6692]

00:00 soundtrack ????

[@arcticridge]

dat fish eye fov though..

[@vadim.ka96]

So he talk about having an ability to counterplay and why it makes BF4 so much better, yet there is suppression in that game? So if someone starts spraying you with a ton of bullets without hitting anything, what option do you have? Thats right - Run. In BF5 however if someone starts shooting you and you know that you can use your skill and kill that person, suddenly you have 2 option - Put your skill on the line and try fighting back, or just take a safe route and run away.

[@TheStella117]

I personally hope that the next battlefield game is pushed off for another year. DICE needs to give battlefield V the same treatment as bf1 and bf4, and support the game until the very end. what would it show if DICE were to just give up on bfv and their first live service? I dont think there will be enough of a player base left to even fully enjoy the next battlefield game.

[@HorseVengeance]

2:12 wtf? What happened with that mine?

[@CR42Yh17m4N]

8:49 looks like you revived your teammate too hard

[@spethmanjones2997]

The overabundance of animations make the game less fun for me personally

[@faux_gray]

I really hope we dont get a battlefield in 2020, or even 2021. Maybe in 2020 battlefield 5 will be ready to release, then we can get a proper battlefield game. Also, even the chat in your playthrough here has people saying why BF4 is better than BF5. I miss the days of custom run servers. Voteckick X: reason: gay LOL!